OVERVIEW: Minnesota Transportation Finance

Similar documents
Overview of Minnesota Highway and Transit Finance. Metropolitan Council Transportation Committee June 22, 2015 and July 13, 2015

Transportation Finance: An Overview

Transportation Finance Overview. Presentation Contents

Chapter 3: Regional Transportation Finance

Transportation Funds Forecast

Transportation Funds Forecast February 2017

Forecast Highlights. HUTD Revenues, FY Biennium Change from EOS '16 Forecast

Chapter 4: Regional Transportation Finance

Transportation Funds Forecast November 2018

City Engineers Association of Minnesota Annual Conference January 31, 2013

Transportation Funds Forecast November 2017

Interested Parties William E. Hamilton Transportation Needs and Revenue Distribution

PAGE R1 REVISOR S FULL-TEXT SIDE-BY-SIDE

Financial Management and Legislative Briefing March 2016

Transportation Trust Fund Overview

2017 Transportation Finance Legislation

End-of-Session Update

Financial Management and Legislative Briefing Enacted Budget Update June 2015

Danny Straessle. Public Information Officer. Paragould Chamber of Commerce

Alabama Transportation Conference. February 9 th, 2015

ASSEMBLY, No. 10 STATE OF NEW JERSEY 217th LEGISLATURE

The Oregon Department of Transportation Budget

Funding Transportation Improvements

2017 UNIFIED TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM AND HB 20 IMPLEMENTATION

REVENUE IMPACT OF PROPOSED LEGISLATION 79th Oregon Legislative Assembly 2017 Regular Session Legislative Revenue Office

Minnesota Transportation Funding Redistribution ( ) Who Contributes More, Who Receives More?

Webinar: Special Session Outcomes July 22, 2011

MPOAC REVENUE STUDY. Study Update Northwest Florida Regional TPO January 18, 2012

Act 89 of January 2014

State Expenditures All Operating Funds

The Transportation Infrastructure Bond Act of 2000

Major State Aids &Taxes DATA ON WHERE THE AIDS GO AND WHERE THE TAXES COME FROM

Transportation Primer

Corridors of Commerce DRAFT Scoring and Prioritization Process. Patrick Weidemann Director of Capital Planning and Programming November 1, 2017

APPENDIX FOR THE METROPOLITAN LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN Forecast of State and Federal Revenues for Statewide and Metropolitan Plans

Indiana Transportation Funding Update

Maine Transportation Needs and Financing

Technical Appendix. FDOT 2040 Revenue Forecast

APPENDIX B TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM #2 TRANSPORTATION FUNDING

Chairman Wathan Spade, Executive Director

TEXAS TRANSPORTATION FUNDING, INCLUDING TEXAS CLEAR LANES AND CONGESTION RELIEF UPDATE

FISCAL IMPACT ($ in millions) FY FY FY FY FY $35.5 ($5.2) ($10.1) ($2.3) ($2.3) ($2.3) ($2.

Transportation Funding in the Charlotte Region

State Expenditures - All Operating Funds

City Fee Report State of Minnesota Cluster Analysis for Minnesota Cities By Fee Category

TESTIMONY. The Texas Transportation Challenge. Testimony Before the Study Commission on Transportation Financing

Transit Financial Activity Review

Transportation Package HB 2017

FY Statewide Capital Investment Strategy... asset management, performance-based strategic direction

GLOSSARY. At-Grade Crossing: Intersection of two roadways or a highway and a railroad at the same grade.

Bringing Virginia s Transportation Funding Up to Speed. August 25, 2014 John W. Lawson Chief Financial Officer

Understanding H.B. 170: The Transportation Funding Act of 2015

((J} Kim Kdc/;J/, CPA, in;jdive certific;jte. Johnson, Nicole (DOT) Attachments:

Internal Audit Report Motor Vehicle Fee Revenue March 2018

Overview of State Highway Fund 0006 Revenues and Allocations, the Texas Mobility Fund, and the Texas Rail Relocation and Improvement Fund

Governor s Working Group on Highway Funding Tuesday, July 28, 2015

House Bill 20 Implementation. House Select Committee on Transportation Planning Tuesday, August 30, 2016, 1:00 P.M. Capitol Extension E2.

MPACT64. Transportation Infrastructure for Colorado. We Can t Afford to Wait

10-Year Capital Highway Investment Plan DRAFT

Referendum 51 Gets Us Moving, Safely, Again

TSCC Budget Review TriMet

Target Formula Re-evaluation

Mobility / Other Modes Roger Nober Executive Vice President Law and Secretary BNSF Railway

Technical Report No. 4. Revenue and Costs

8.0 FINANCIAL ANALYSIS

This annual continuing disclosure report contains or references the following information:

Joint Appropriations Subcommittee on Transportation

Driving Ahead for Funding: What Will We Do About Our Crumbling Transportation System

2017 Educational Series FUNDING

Maine Transportation Needs and Financing

Addressing Virginia s Transportation Needs: A 3-Step Process. Delegate S. Chris Jones Southern Legislative Conference July 19, 2015

1 (b) Reconstruct and rehabilitate state highways to better maintain 2 them and prevent and avoid costly future repairs; 3 (c) Support local

State Taxes Only See Separate Analysis for Property Taxes and Local Aids

Regional Transit System: Return on Investment Assessment. October 2012

Financial Snapshot October 2014

Danny Straessle Public Information Officer ARKANSAS STATE HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT

A Bill Regular Session, 2019 HOUSE BILL 1260

Contact Matt Massman, Lead Fiscal Analyst, at 651/ or or the relevant fiscal analyst identified below.

INVESTMENT STRATEGIES

Department of Transportation

State of New Hampshire

Transportation Funding State Comparisons. 21 st Century Transportation Committee August 21, 2008

SECOND REGULAR SESSION SENATE COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE FOR HOUSE COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE FOR AN ACT

Mileage Based User Fee Policy Task Force. Lee Munnich, Senior Fellow, Humphrey School of Public Affairs, University of Minnesota.

MN Asphalt Construction & Quality Workshop

State Expenditures All Operating Funds

Randy Ort Assistant Chief - Administration. Southwest Arkansas Transportation

MPOAC REVENUE STUDY. MPOAC Revenue Study Governing Board and Staff Directors Joint WORKSHOP January 26, 2012 Tallahassee, FL

Last year, transit spent almost $1.1 billion on materials and services contracts with more than 2,000 Pennsylvania businesses.

TESTIMONY ON PENNSYLVANIA TURNPIKE DEBT SENATE AND HOUSE TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEES

10 Financial Analysis

Department of Transportation

FY 2018 Governor s Revised General Fund Supplemental Budget Recommendations ($ in millions) March 16 Budget

Options to Address Minnesota s Budget Deficit

HigHway Carrying Bridges in new Jersey

Material Comparison ( ) County Engineer s Cost Saving Methods/ Grants How would increased revenues be used?

2017 RISK ASSESSMENT AND PROGRAM EVALUATION AND AUDIT PLAN

Summary of Key Points. Kansas Legislative Research Department Summary of Legislation

History of Local Government Aid to Cities Updated December 2017

STATE MOTOR FUEL TAX INCREASES:

Transcription:

OVERVIEW: Minnesota Transportation Finance and the I-35W I Bridge Background: MN Transportation Finance I-35W Bridge collapse & federal funding process MN Transportation Program Evaluation New Legislation Bridge Improvement Program & Follow-up

Constitutionally Dedicated Transportation Revenues Motor Fuel Tax (Gas Tax) Vehicle Registration Tax (Tab Fees) Motor Vehicle Sales Tax (MVST) 2006 constitutional amendment

Motor Fuel Tax (Gas Tax) Tax rate 20 cents per gallon, 1988-2008 Raised $644 m in FY 2007 or $32.2 m/penny Before 2008 increase, MN s tax rate was below average nationally Ranked 31st out of 50 states and D.C. Tax revenues constitutionally dedicated to Highway User Tax Distribution Fund (HUTDF) Revenues used solely for highway purposes

Vehicle Registration Tax (Tab Fees) Raised $485 m in FY 2007 2003: maximum tax caps imposed $189 in 2 nd year of vehicle life $99 in 3 rd year and on Tax revenues constitutionally dedicated to Highway User Tax Distribution Fund (HUTDF) Revenues used solely for highway purposes

Motor Vehicle Sales Tax (MVST) Pre-2003, MVST revenues deposited in state general fund 2003: some MVST revenues dedicated to transportation funds: 32% to HUTDF 21.75% to public transit funds 2006: constitutional amendment passed Dedicated 100% of MVST to transportation funds (highways and transit) 2007: Legislature split funds 60% to highways, 40% to transit Raised $533 million total in FY 2007 $164 million to highway funds

Motor Fuel Tax $ 644 m Registration Tax $ 484 m Motor Vehicle Sales Tax $ 160 m Collection Costs DNR & Other $17 m Highway User Fund FY 2007 $1.3 billion Misc. Revenue $2.6 m Trunk Highway Fund (58.9%) $744 m County State Aid (27.55%) $348 m Municipal State Aid (8.55%) $108 m Town Roads, Bridges & Flexible Fund (5.0%) $63 m

Historical Highway User Tax Fund Revenues $1,500 $1,300 $1,100 Total HUTDF MVST $900 $700 Vehicle Registration Tax $500 $300 Motor Fuel Tax $100 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 est

HUTDF Revenue Projection Per February 2008 Forecast $1,500 $1,300 $1,100 $900 $700 $500 $300 $100 Total HUTDF 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 est 2009 est MVST Vehicle Registration Tax Motor Fuel Tax 2010 est 2011 est

HUTDF Revenues & Inflation, 2001-2011 2011 (dollars in thousands) $700,000 $600,000 $500,000 $400,000 $300,000 $200,000 $100,000 $0 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Gas Tax Gas Tax Infl. Adj. Tab Fees Tab Fees Infl. Adj. MVST MVST Infl. Adj.

Transportation Bonding Trunk Highway Bonds: Four TH Bond authorizations between 2000-2007, 2007, totaling $620.7 million New TH Bond authorization in 2008: $1.8 billion Debt service on new bonds partially offset with new gas tax surcharge General Obligation Bonds Local roads and bridges Transit projects (commuter and light rail)

Estimated Unfunded Transportation Needs MnDOT Highways County Highways City Streets Local Bridges Metropolitan Transit Greater MN Transit Ports and Waterways Freight Rail State Airports Fund TOTAL Annual Shortfall $ 1,100 m $ 274 m $ 199 $ 110 $ 350 $ 45 $ 5 $ 2 $ 1 $ 1.986 Billion

I-35W Bridge in Minneapolis Collapsed August 1, 2007

Tensions were high Fall 2007 Four Reports Requested National Transportation Safety Board MN Office of the Legislative Auditor MN Legislature s Joint Bridge Committee Governor s Office Transportation Contingent Appropriations Group

Transportation Contingent Appropriations Group (TCAG) Created during the 2007 Legislative Session Consists of the Speaker of the House, Senate Majority Leader, House Ways and Means Committee Chair, Senate Finance Committee Chair, Chairs of the House and Senate Transportation Finance Committees, and ranking transportation finance minority members Legislation allows the group to approve appropriations from the trunk highway fund for specific activities Legislation tested for the first time when the bridge collapsed

Transportation Contingent Appropriations Group (TCAG) at Work TCAG met six times between October and December Discussed funding for the bridge and the regularly scheduled construction program I-35W Bridge project let in September Trunk Highway Fund balance low Reviewed detailed information in a public forum Appropriated additional funding

State Appropriations for the I-35W Bridge Date Trunk Highway Fund Appropriations ($ in millions) Amount 09/07 10/07 12/07 02/08 Ongoing 2007 Special Session TCAG Appropriation TCAG Appropriation Transportation Finance Bill Appropriation Use of Existing Authority $53.2 $60.0 $30.0 $132.0 $96.5 Total State Appropriations Total Federal Funds Authorized and Appropriated $371.7 $371.7

Office of the Legislative Auditor State of of Minnesota EVALUATION REPORT Minnesota Highways and Bridges NLPES Fall Training Conference September 2008

Looking For Answers National Transportation Safety Board Consultants hired by the state Joint Committee to Investigate the Bridge Collapse Office of the Legislative Auditor (OLA) Is the bridge inspection program adequate? How well have infrastructure investments aligned with needs?

Challenges Partisan atmosphere Mistrust of MnDOT leadership Many key legislators Media distractions Time pressures Not enough staff

Approach Methodology lite Descriptive Existing data sources Heavy reliance on interviews Scope limited to state system, excluding local State: 4,500 bridges & 12,000 miles of road Local: 14,700 bridges & 124,000 miles of road Focus on policy/practice, not why the bridge fell

Bridge Inspection & Maintenance Sufficient inspection resources available Exception: fracture critical bridges Inconsistent documentation of maintenance decisions following inspections Districts reported: Getting to high-priority maintenance Falling behind on lower-priority and routine maintenance Declines in bridge crew staffing

Condition of Highways and Bridges Bridges Overall, trunk highway bridge condition improved, but some major bridges need to be replaced Highways Trunk highway pavement condition worsened and is predicted to continue to decline

Trunk Highway Pavement Condition Percentage of Road Miles in Poor Condition 12% 10% Projected 8% 6% 4% 2% 0% 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Principal Arterials Nonprincipal Roads Target: 2% or less Target: 3% or less

Investment management Weaknesses in transportation planning Spending not aligned with preservation first

Spending Not Preservation First Contracts Let (millions) $1,000 $900 $800 $700 Roads Expansion Preservation Bridges and Culverts Expansion Preservation $600 $500 $400 $300 $200 $100 $0 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007

Investment management Weaknesses in transportation planning Spending not aligned with preservation first Future funding picture is grim

Trunk Highway Preservation Needs Annual Construction Spending Needed to Meet Performance Targets, FY 2012-2018 Pavements Bridges and Culverts Major Bridge Replacement Other Structures Subtotal Total $440 million 112 million 120 million $232 million $672 million Estimated Revenue (as of 1/08) $635-700 million

MnDOT Action on the Report Agreed with findings and recommendations Developing a statewide system to link bridge maintenance decisions with inspections New project scoping and cost-estimating procedures Revised 20-year plan better scoped to expectations of available funding

2008 Legislation Chapter 152 (Omnibus Transportation Finance Bill) Enacted very quickly: Session began February 12; bill introduced same day Bill passed both bodies February 21 Vetoed February 22 (Friday) Overriden February 25 (Monday)

Chapter 152 Revenues (millions, projected for FY 2012) Gas Tax Increase $ 154.9 Registration Tax Increase 158.1 Debt Service Surcharge 91.7 Leasing Sales Tax Shift 12.6 Metro Area Sales Tax 96.0 TOTAL $ 513.3

Chapter 152 Key Aspects 5 cent Gas Tax Increase: 2 cents April 1, 2008 3 cents October 1, 2008 Debt Service Surcharge: Gas tax surcharge to partially cover debt service on $1.8 billion in highway bonding 0.5 cents August 1, 2008 Gradual increase until cap of 3.5 cents per gallon In effect until full debt service retired

Chapter 152 Key Aspects (cont.) Registration Tax Increase: Maximum Tax caps removed Depreciation schedule accelerated Effective only for new registrations Metro Area Sales Tax: 0.25% sales tax in five metro counties Proceeds used for capital and operating assistance for transit ways

Chapter 152 Key Aspects (cont.) Lower Income Motor Fuels Tax Credit $25 refundable credit Cost of tax credit taken off top of leasing sales tax revenue, before distribution to transportation funds Motor Vehicle Leasing Sales Tax: Currently 100% deposited in general fund 2010-2012 2012 phase-in to transportation funds: 50% for rural transit 50% for county state-aid aid roads

Chapter 152 Key Aspects (cont.) Trunk Highway Bonding $1.8 billion in bonds, over ten years Debt service partially covered by gas tax surcharge Specified projects, including Trunk Highway Bridge Improvement Program

Bridge Terminology Fracture Critical: : Bridges that have a design so that if certain key parts of the bridge structure fail the entire bridge could collapse. Structurally Deficient: When a bridge has a deck, superstructure, or substructure with a condition rating of 4 or less. Condition Rating: Indicates the physical condition of the bridge and is assigned on a scale of 0 to 9, where 0 is failed/out of service and 9 is excellent condition. Sufficiency Rating: A computed numerical value that is used to determine whether a bridge is eligible for federal funding. Ratings vary from 0 to 100.

Trunk Highway Bridge Improvement Program New program for key bridges. Program includes: All fracture-critical critical bridges All structurally deficient bridges Any other bridges identified by the Commissioner of MnDOT as priority projects MnDOT must create an inventory of the bridges Legislation outlines three tiers of bridges - MnDOT must start work on Tier 1 and Tier 2 bridges by June 30, 2018 Program requires two legislative reports

Bridge Improvement Program Schedule Category Through 2012 2013-2018 After 2018 Total Tier 1 (40 Bridges) Major Bridges 4 5 9 Other Bridges 26 5 31 Tier 2 (120 Bridges) Major Bridges 1 1 2 Other Bridges 51 39 25 115 Tier 3 (11 Bridges) 11 11 Priority Projects (1) 1 1 Total Bridges 83 50 36 169

Bridge Improvement Program Spending Plan Source 2009 2012 2013 2018 Total Amount % of Funds Trunk Highway Bonds $462 $787 $1,249 49.6% Federal Funds $151 $528 $679 27.0% Local Operating Funds $208 $382 $590 23.4% Total $821 $1,697 $2,519 100.0% Notes: 1. $ in millions. 2. This spending plan includes funding for fixing 120 bridges, including 34 Tier 1 bridges, 85 Tier 2 bridges, and 1 commissioner s project. 3. Thirteen bridges are scheduled to be fixed prior to FY 2009. 4. Twenty-five Tier 2 bridges are fixed after 2018, and all Tier 3 bridges are fixed after 2018.

Looking Forward National Transportation Safety Board report Potentially amend the 2008 language Bridge program Variety of language issues Funding continues to be a discussion Agency-defined needs vs. funding available Transit raising fares Policy implications stemming from the various reports

The I-35W I St. Anthony Bridge September 18, 2008