School District of. Preliminary 2011 Financing Program

Similar documents
School District of Pl Palm Beach hcounty: Market Update and. Debt Portfolio

School Board of Palm Beach County Finance Committee Meeting November 4, 2016

Market Update and Restructuring Options for Auction Rate Securities January 30, 2008

ACI NA FINANCE SEMINAR CURRENT MUNICIPAL MARKET UPDATE

Finance Committee Presentation Financing of the Courthouse and Jail Expansion. October 7 th, 2009

Asset Liability Management Report 4 Q 2018

American Association of Ports Authorities. Current State of Port Financing Alternatives. June 9, David C. Miller Managing Director

Debt Profile Update. March 24, 2011

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION

Alternatives to Advance Refundings

BONDS 101 AND MARKET UPDATE

I N T R O D U C T I O N T O T A X - E X E M P T B O N D S

Fremont Union High School District CONTINUING DISCLOSURE FILING

School District of Palm Beach County - Swap Update

Asset Liability Management Report 3 Q 2016

Who Says Financing Has To Be Conventional

SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA SERIES 2014 TAN SALE

UPDATE ON THE MUNICIPAL BOND MARKET: LANDSCAPE, TRENDS & OPPORTUNITIES

How to Improve Your Bond Rating and Current Trends in the Municipal Bond Market

REFUNDING OPPORTUNITIES IN A RISING RATE ENVIRONMENT

January 25, 2017 Financial Markets & Debt Portfolio Update Contra Costa Transportation Authority Introduction Public Financial Management Inc. (PFM),

Attachment A Financial Markets & Debt Portfolio Update October 21, 2016 Introduction Public Financial Management Inc. (PFM), financial advisor to the

Bond Market Update. 112 th Annual Conference. John Hallacy. Michael Decker. Cindy Harris. Patrick Early. 10:30 12:10 May 7, 2018 Ferrara Theater

Looking at a Variety of Municipal Valuation Metrics

Asset Liability Management Report 1 Q 2017

Division of Bond Finance Interest Rate Calculations. Revenue Estimating Conference Interest Rates Used for Appropriations, including PECO Bond Rates

2013 Hot Topics in Higher Education Finance

Financial Markets & Debt Portfolio Update August 23, 2016 Introduction Public Financial Management Inc., (PFM), financial advisor to the Contra Costa

ICCCFO SPRING CONFERENCE The New Federal Tax Law Its Impact and Debt Strategies Going Forward

Municipal Market Update

Market Update Overview of Market Conditions & California Land- Secured Sector Update. February 17, 2017

GOLDEN OPPORTUNITIES CALIFORNIA PUBLIC FINANCE ROADSHOW

why build america bonds matter to municipal bond investors Managers Investment Group Research and Analysis MARCH 2010 What are Build America Bonds?

Financial Markets & Debt Portfolio Update May 25, 2016 Introduction Public Financial Management Inc., (PFM), financial advisor to the Contra Costa Tra

Executive Summary. July 17, 2015

September 9, Geneva Community Unit School District 304, Kane County, Illinois. Update on Debt Restructuring Options

Report to the Finance Committee Review of Variable Rate Debt. MTA Finance Department Patrick J. McCoy, Director April 24, 2017

HIGHLIGHTS: CONTACT US: MARKET UPDATE: February 2018

Annual Debt Report. for the year ended June 30, 2008

April 2014 Investment Report

INTEREST RATE & FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT POLICY Adopted February 18, 2009

Tax Rebate Liability Liquidity Facility Type of Resolution Series Swap Provider (Insurer) Facility Exp. Date Derivative Instruments

Internal Lending Program Update

5-yr Investment Grade Corporate CDS Markit (bps) 500

Outstanding debt in all sectors of the US fixed income market has gone from $4.6 trillion in 1985 to $33 trillion in 2008.

Palm Beach County School District

STYLE. Elk Grove Unified School District. Financial Stewardship: Bonds. Prepared by Lori Raineri and Rich Malone April 19, 2016

Debt Administration 101. FGFOA Palm Beach Chapter. April 10, Presenters:

91 EXPRESS LANES FUND (An Enterprise Fund of the Orange County Transportation Authority) FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. Year Ended June 30, 2010

State and Local Government Debt Since the Financial Crisis

ULY 2015 INTRODUCTIONN. the Capital. policy. framework. II. Action Items. Overview. D. Swap Program

CDO Market Overview & Outlook. CDOs in the Heartland. Lang Gibson Director of Structured Credit Research March 25, 2004

Alternative Variable Rate Products

Report to the Finance Committee 2018 Year End Review. MTA Finance Department Patrick McCoy, Director January 22, 2019

DEBT SERVICE FUNDS. Debt Management Policy and Guidelines

INTEREST RATE SWAP POLICY

Annual Investment Report. Board of Trustees Finance & Audit Workgroup August 15, 2013

Susquehanna Group Advisors, Inc.

Palm Beach County School District

Evaluating the Use of Interest Rate Swaps by U.S. Public Finance Issuers 1 11

Municipal Bond Credit Report 1Q Volume V No. New York n Washington

State of the Muni Markets

Future of Infrastructure Finance

RESEARCH REPORT VARIABLE RATE DEMAND OBLIGATIONS 2010 UPDATE OCTOBER New York n Washington. Volume V No.

Chesapeake Bay Bridge & Tunnel District Statement of Revenues, Expenses, and Changes in Net Position As of June 30, 2016 & 2015

Orange Unified School District

DEBT SERVICE FUNDS. Debt Management Policy and Guidelines

School District of Palm Beach County, Florida

Risk Management and Hedging Strategies. CFO BestPractice Conference September 13, 2011

Dallas Independent School District

Agenda Report. October 22, Honorable Mayor and City Council Pasadena Public Financing Authority. THROUGH: Finance Committee

Derivatives Use Report

Structuring and Marketing a Negotiated Bond Issue

Debt. Summary of Policy. utilized in, lead and senior manager roles when appropriate

Derivatives Use Report

Palm Beach County School District

Metropolitan Transportation Authority

Derivatives Use Report

Fixed Income Portfolio Management

Central Florida Expressway Authority

Annual. Investment Policy Report. August 18, 2011 Board of Trustees Finance & Audit Workgroup

CITY OF CAPE CORAL ANNUAL DEBT AND CREDIT REPORT

Florida Municipal Power Agency. Executive Committee. Taylor Swaps Workshop

The Fundamentals of Public Finance

Muni Fortnightly. December 18, 2017

Municipal Bonds. Mid-Atlantic Association for Financial Professionals. Municipal Capital Markets Group September 17, 2014

Muni Fortnightly. Treasury curve bear-flattens on tax policy advancement and Flynn plea. Munis generally underperform.

OCTOBER 2013 DULLES CORRIDOR ENTERPRISE REPORT OF THE FINANCIAL ADVISORS

DEBT MANAGEMENT EXAMINATION

DEBT POLICY Last Revised October 11, 2013 Last Reviewed October 7, 2016

Policies and Procedures SECTION:

University of Virginia Interest Rate Risk Management Policy Approved April 2006

Economic Calendar. Time CST Release Period

FLORIDA MUNICIPAL LOAN COUNCIL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

An Introduction to Municipal Bonds for NALEO

Recent Debt Summary & Related Issues

MUNICIPAL BONDS IN TEXAS and THE BOND SALE PROCESS

2018 Investment and Economic Outlook

Monthly Market Update August 2016

Tax Credit Bonds: Overview and Analysis

Transcription:

School District of Palm Beach County, Florida Preliminary 2011 Financing Program presented by Public Financial Management 300 S. Orange Avenue Suite 1170 Orlando, FL 32801 407-648-2208 407-648-1323 fax

Table of Contents I. Market Update II. Summary of Outstanding Debt III. 2011 Financing Program I. Series 2007B (Put Bonds) II. Series 2001B Swaption Structures

MARKET UPDATE

Market Update: Current Municipal Market Rates in Perspective 6.00% 5.00% 4.00% 3.00% 2.00% 1.00% MMD AAA G.O. Curve AAA GO 4/2/2007 AAA GO 4/1/2008 AAA GO 4/1/2009 AAA GO 4/1/2010 AAA GO 4/1/2011 While interest rates spiked late in 2010 and early 2011, rates remain near levels seen over the past five years 0.00% 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 14.00% Bond Buyer 20-Year GO Index In a broader historical context, rates are still attractive Inflation will always be the biggest determinant of absolute levels 12.00% 10.00% 8.00% 6.00% 4.00% 2.00% 0.00% Source: Bloomberg & TM3 4

Market Update: What s In Store for 2011? Expiration of ARRA Programs Regulation The Year of the Restructure Part II A significant number of VRDOs, put bonds and forward starting swaps need to be addressed in 2011 Even Fewer Bond Insurance Options Headline Risk Discussion in the press of local government bankruptcy (60 Minutes) Increased disclosure of pension challenges Interest Rate trends Most economists predict rising rates but when! 5

Market Update: ARRA Programs Expiration of ARRA programs BQ back to $10 million BABs gone Recovery Zone expired Qualified School Construction Bonds Some unused allocation can be used in 2011 Issuer Type Recovery Zone Economic Qualified School Clean Qualified Energy Refund AMT Repeal of AMT on New Money Build America Development Recovery Zone Construction Renewable Conservation Bonds with Non- Private Activity Bonds Bonds Facility Bonds Bonds Energy Bonds Bonds AMT Bonds Bonds Acronym BABs RZEDBs RZFBs QSCBs CREBs QECBs N/A N/A N/A Expansion of Bank Qualified Bonds Tax-Exempt Bonds, Non- AMT Tax Credit Tax Credit Tax Credit N/A N/A N/A Type Direct Subsidy Direct Subsidy % of Tax Credit / Subsidy 35% 45% N/A 100% 70% 70% N/A N/A N/A Time Period 2009-2010 2009-2010 2009-2010 2009-2010 No Change No Change 2009-2010 2009-2010 2009-2010 Program Limit No Limit $10 Billion $15 Billion $22 Billion $1.6 Billion $3.2 Billion No Limit No Limit No Limit Government x x - x x x x x x 501(c )3 - - - - - x x - x Energy x x x - x x x x x Corporate - - x - x x x x x Structural Limit Traditional Traditional Traditional Section 54A Section 54A Section 54A Private Activity Bonds Private Activity Bonds Traditional In some instances, residual allocations carry forward to 2011 6

Market Update: No More BABs AMT 1% BABs Era Municipal Bond Issuance % of Total Par by Tax Status 2010 Year End Taxable 35% Tax-Exempt 64% Taxable issuance will most likely drop to pre-babs era levels Expiration of BABs will increase long-dated tax-exempt supply Taxable issuance grew from approximately 7% of the market to 35% through h the BABs program BABs issuance primarily concentrated on the long end Pre-BABs Era Municipal Bond Issuance % of Total Par by Tax Status Tax-Exempt 84.5% 2007 Year End AMT 8.8% Taxable 6.7% 7

Market Update: Investor Demand Is Weaker Tax-Exempt mutual funds have experienced significant outflows since November 2010 Combination of increased supply and weaker demand does not bode well for Tax-Exempt rates $10 Demand $5 Billions $0 ($5) Inflows (Outflows) ($10) ($15) 8/1/10 9/1/10 10/1/10 11/1/10 12/1/10 1/1/11 2/1/11 3/1/11 8

Market Update: Limited Bond Insurance There is one functional bond insurer. Typically used for A rated credits and lower 'Caa2' / Developing Ratings Withdrawn Ratings Withdrawn 'Aa3' / Negative 'AA+' / Stable Ratings Withdrawn BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC. 'Aa1' / Stable Outlook 'AA+' / Stable Not Rated Ratings Withdrawn Ratings Withdrawn Ratings Withdrawn Ratings Withdrawn Ratings Withdrawn Ratings Withdrawn 'Ca' / Developing Regulatory Supervision Ratings Withdrawn - Formerly XL Capital Corp 'B3' / Negative 'B' / Negative Ratings Withdrawn Illinois 'Baa1' / Developing 'BBB' / Developing NotRated MBIA Corp has migrated all municipal bond, reserve fund surety and swap policies to MBIA Insurance Illinois. Ratings as of 12/23/10 9

Market Update: What s the Bottom Line? Interest rates are appealing by historic standards, but credit spreads and market factors drive up the cost of permanent, long-term fixed rates for Florida school districts 6.0% 20-Year MMD Rate Comparison 5.0% 0.40% 0.05% 1.40% 4.0% 0.80% 3.0% 4.35% 2.0% 3.30% 4.21% 1.0% 0.0% Spring 2008 Rates Summer 2010 Rates Current Rates 20-Year AAA MMD Bond Insurance Credit Spread 10

SUMMARY OF OUTSTANDING DEBT

Approach to Debt Management: Asset Liability Management (ALM) Traditional Debt Management focuses on optimizing liabilities can lead to hidden risk Asset Liability Management considers debt AND financial assets and measures relationships to reduce net debt service and mitigate risk Results for the District Over $60 million in savings to date Asset Management Asset Allocation Cash Management Performance Measurement Manager Selection ALM The continuous process of actively managing assets, liabilities and financial risks together in an effort to maximize net cash flow and limit risk in support of the District s mission Debt Management Fixed vs. variable Diversification of variable rate debt Taxable vs. taxexempt Debt service profile Bank loans & leases Risk Management Risk Quantification Risk Tolerance Assessment Financial Products Insurance Graphic courtesy of Citigroup, December 2006 12

Core Tenant to ALM: Variable Rate Debt Can Provide Natural Hedge Volatile cash flows from financial activities Risk of poor margins 8% impacting service, ability to 7% invest in future capacity / service Difficulty in budgeting and BEFORE 6% 5% 4% 3% 2% meeting ggoals 1% 0% Unnecessarily high interest expense, low investment income More stable and predictable cash flows 8% 7% Source of stability for the 6% 5% organization 4% Ease of budgeting Source of competitive advantage Helps maintain or improve credit ratings Volatile net cash flow Dec-91 Apr-94 Sep-96 Jan-99 May-01 Sep-03 Feb-06 AFTER Investment Income Stable net cash flow Interest Expense 3% 2% 1% 0% Dec-91 Apr-94 Sep-96 Jan-99 May-01 Sep-03 Feb-06 Investment Income Graphic courtesy of Citigroup, December 2006 Interest Expense 13

Current Outstanding Debt The District has approximately $1.9 Billion in COPs outstanding: s Millions 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 Approximately $500 Million has been retired since issuance Annual payments of approximately $140 million 2011 2012 2013 Current Outstanding Debt Structure 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 DS Excluding 2001B, 2007B & 2010QSCB 2001B 2007B 2010 QSCB 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 Principal Series Outstanding 2001A $495,000 2001B 164,315,000 2002A 37,045,000 2002B 115,350,000 2002C 7,835,000 2002D 145,850,000 2002E 58,000,000 2002Q 407,143 2003A 40,480,000 2003B 124,295,000295 2004A 87,300,000 2004Q 1,471,185 2005A 123,705,000 2005Q 1,183,912 2006A 199,595,000 2007A 238,855,000855 2007B 116,225,000 2007C 190,605,000 2007D 22,725,000 2007E 147,390,000 2010 QSCB 67,665,000 Total $1,890,792,240 14

Components of Capital Structure Almost 65% of the District s obligations have fixed interest rates with no ongoing market exposure The remaining is constructed as fixed interest rate, but uses swaps and/or puts that must be managed over time: Swaps were used to lower targeted interest rate Put structure t was used to manage variable rate obligations during credit crisis Current PBSD Capital Structure Type of Debt Dollars % Fixed Rate COPs $1,224,649,611,, 64.77% 2003B Synthetic Fixed 124,295,000 6.57% Fixed Rate (2007B Put) 116,225,000 6.15% Synthetic Fixed Rate (2002B) 115,350,000 6.10% 2001B & 2002D Swaption 310,165,000 16.40% Total $1,890,684,611 100.00% 6% 6% 7% 16% 65% Fixed Rate COPs 2003B Synthetic Fixed Fixed Rate (2007B Put) Synthetic Fixed Rate (2002B) 2001B & 2002D Swaption 15

COP Profile: On-Going Debt Management The District has generated over $60 million in savings through active debt management Requires ongoing management for a portion of the debt SUMMARY OF OUTSTANDING OBLIGATIONS AS OF 012/31/10 Series Principal Outstanding as of 12/31/10 Final Maturity Fixed or Variable Insurer / Credit Enhancement Exposure to Market Changes CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION 2001A 495,000 08/01/11 F Ambac None 2001B 164,315,000 08/01/25 F Ambac Pending Swaption (8/1/2011) 2002A 37,045,000 08/01/18 F FSA None 2002B 115,350,000 08/01/27 V FSA VRDO (liquidity)/swap (3/12/2012) 2002C 7,835,000 08/01/12 F FSA None 2002D 145,850,000 08/01/28 F FSA Basic Swap/Swaption (8/1/2012) 2002E 58,000,000 08/01/16 F Ambac None 2002Q 407,143 06/11/16 F None None 2003A 40,480,000 08/01/21 F Ambac None 2003B 124,295,000 08/01/29 V Ambac SIFMA plus 65 bps/swap 2004A 87,300,000 08/01/29 F FGIC None 2004Q 1,471,185 04/30/20 F None None 2005A 123,705,000 08/01/22 F FSA None 2005Q 1,183,912 12/15/20 F None None 2006A 199,595,000 08/01/31 F FSA None 2007A 238,855,000 08/01/31 F FGIC None 2007B 116,225,000 08/01/25 F FGIC Put due 8/1/2011 2007C 190,605,000 08/01/27 F Ambac None 2007D 22,725,000 08/01/15 F MBIA None 2007E 147,390,000 08/01/32 F MBIA None 2010A QSCB 67,665,000 08/01/25 F None None Total COPS 1,890,792,240 OTHER OBLIGATIONS RANS 56,000,000 02/22/11 F None Total Other Items 56,000,000 CAPITAL OUTLAY BOND ISSUES (ISSUE BY STATE OF FLORIDA) Total COBIs 29,555,000 Grand Total 1,976,347,240 16

PROPOSED PLAN OF FINANCE

2011 Debt Management Calendar The 2011 debt calendar includes: Typical/traditional activity TANs Debt management opportunities $8 Million Termination Payment to District Forward Delivery Agreement 2007B Put Bond roll over, 2001B Swaption exercise, etc School Board of Palm Beach County, Florida 1/1 1/15 1/29 2/12 2/26 3/12 3/26 4/9 4/23 5/7 5/21 6/4 6/18 7/2 7/16 7/30 8/13 8/27 9/10 9/24 10/8 10/22 2 11/5 11/19 12/3 12/17 12/31 1 2010 QSCB Swaps CMS Term Series 2001B Series 2002D 8/2012 Exercise Date Put Put Rollover Bond Series 2007B TAN 2011 TAN Planning Executed Period of Execution 18

2007B (Put Bond) Plan of Finance 2007B COPs were originally issued as variable rate COPs (Auction Rate) Market turmoil in 2008 led to temporary fix using Put Bond structure Locked in Yield at 5% Put Bond matures in August 2011 As part of the plan of finance for the 2010 QSCB financing, the Finance Committee discussed d and approved amortizing i a portion of the 2007B in 2030-2032 Current Outstanding Debt Structure Outstanding Debt After Restructure of 2007B 160 160 140 140 120 120 ons Millio 100 80 ons Milli 100 80 60 60 40 40 20 20 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 DS Excluding 2001B, 2007B & 2010QSCB 2001B 2007B 2010 QSCB DS Excluding 2001B, 2007B & 2010QSCB 2001B 2007B 2010 QSCB 19

2007B (Put Bond) Plan of Finance Shape of the current yield curves suggests that three structures should be considered for the 2007B Put COP roll over Traditional Fixed Rate Fixed Rate/Put Blend Fixed Rate/FRN Blend Par Amount of Fixed Rate $115,250,000 $44,235,000 $44,235,000 Par Amount of Put/FRN $0 $68,915,000 $72,935,000 Total Par Amount $115,250,000 $113,150,000 $117,170,000 Total Debt Service $226,874,125 $208,023,975 023 $179,922,734922 734 All-In TIC 5.57% 4.71% 1 3.27% 2 1) 5% Roll 2016 PUT 2) SIFMA 10-Year Average + 80 bps Current Interest Rates 7.00% 6.00% 5.00% 4.00% 3.00% 2.00% 1.00% 0.00% 2012 2015 2018 2021 2024 2027 2030 2033 2036 2039 MMD - 3/22/2011 FL COP (AA- rated) 20

Historical Perspective 7.0 12-Year Municipal Rates 60 6.0 5.0 Yield (%) 4.0 3.0 12-Year AAA MMD + AA 12-Year AAA MMD Revenue Credit Spread % below 5% 2.0 72.48% 68.59% Maximum 6.45% 6.50% Minimum 2.17% 2.33% Mean1.0 4.34% 4.46% Median 4.29% 4.39% Standard Deviation 0.90% 0.88% 0.0 Jul-91 Jul-92 Jul-93 Jul-94 Jul-95 Jul-96 Jul-97 Jul-98 Jul-99 Jul-00 Jul-01 Jul-02 Jul-03 Jul-04 Jul-05 Jul-06 Jul-07 Jul-08 Jul-09 Jul-10 Maturity 12-Year AAA MMD 12-Year AAA MMD + AA Revenue Credit Spreads" 5% Roll-Over Assumption 21

2001B Swaption Background 2001B COPs refinanced the Series 2000A COPs In 2005, interest rates were low enough to refinance the 2001B COPs for savings, but tax law does not allow a second advance refunding The first refunding date permitted is August 1, 2011 So, The District entered into a swaption to trigger the refunding in August of 2011 and received $6,250,000 in 2005 Assumptions: Total Costs of Issuance including insurance - $909,000000 Liquidity 15bps & Remarketing 8bps Current Situation Current Costs of Issuance - $700,000 000 (no insurance - AMBAC) Liquidity 70 bps & Remarketing 10 bps Net increase in ongoing cost of 57bps (0.57%) per year 22

2001B Swaption: Approach to Managing the Exercise this Fall The swap counter-party has the option to start the swap on August 1, 2011 $30.00 Swap Mark to Market Over Time Given the change in market factors (higher liquidity costs), the District is developing options to minimize the cost or enhance the expected savings Can the District i t make the Swaption go away? Yes, the District has the option to terminate the swap at any time. But the District would have to pay the market price Millions $25.00 $20.00 $15.00 $10.00 $5.00 $0.00 8/16/2005 8/16/2006 8/16/2007 8/16/2008 8/16/2009 8/16/2010 2001B Mark to Market 4.5 4.0 SIFMA Swap RatesSince 2005 Swaps have a market price referred to as the Mark to Market value. As interest rates move over time, the MTM changes (%) Swap Rate ( 3.5 3.0 2.5 Current MTM - $23,245,383.33 2.0 The relationship between swap rates and the MTM is inverse 1.5 8/16/2005 8/16/2006 8/16/2007 8/16/2008 8/16/2009 8/16/2010 10Y SIFMA Swap Rate 23

2001B Swaption: Summary of Financing Alternatives The plan of finance must be flexible enough to respond to market changes between now and execution The decision tree below outlines the primary options and decision points that have been considered Cash Termination of Swaps + Consider Conventional Fixed Rate Refunding Series 2001B Swaption Evaluate MTMs Acceptable Termination/Fixed Rate Costs Finance Termination of Swaps + Fixed Rate Refunding or Medium Term Notes Allow Exercise of Swaps + Variable Rate Refunding 24

2001B Swaption: Summary of Financing Alternatives The chart below shows the historic MTM and the most likely financing strategy in each market condition Swap Mark kto Market Over Time $30.00 $25.00 Leave swap in place and issue variable rate COPS Low long-term interest rates Millio ons $20.00 $15.00 Terminate swap, issue fixed rate (potentially Put) $10.00 $5.00 $0.00 Terminate swap and refund later 8/16/2005 8/16/2006 8/16/2007 8/16/2008 8/16/2009 8/16/2010 High long-term interest rates 2001B Mark to Market 25

2001B Swaption: Structuring Options Financing Structure Utilized Series 2001B Bonds - Base Case Comparison of Financing Results - Series 2001B 1 Exercise Swap Alternatives Variable Rate Demand Bonds Floating Rate Notes Terminate Swap Alternatives Medium Term Note Fixed Rate Refunding Traditional Fixed Rate Refunding Par Amount Issued N/A 162,980,000 162,980,000 182,580,000 180,950,000 Par Amount Refunded N/A 160,465,000 160,465,000 160,465,000 160,465,000 Swap Termination N/A N/A N/A (23,245,000) (23,245,000) Interest Rates Existing Rates SIFMA SIFMA + 70 bps MMD + 140 bps MMD + 140 bps LOC Fee N/A 0.70% N/A N/A N/A Remarketing Fee N/A 0.10% N/A N/A N/A Remarketing Term N/A 3 yrs (ongoing) 3 yrs (ongoing) 7 yrs (1 time) N/A All-in Rate w/termination 5.20% 5.47% 5.39% 610% 6.10% 6.22% Average Annual Debt Service 17,518,384 17,930,708 17,695,122 18,721,776 19,031,520 Total Net Debt Service 245,306,042 251,029,909 249,206,295 263,665,012 268,027,240 PV of Total Debt Service 161,902,927 165,752,669 164,388,322 173,761,850 175,502,421 Estimated PV Benefit (Cost) N/A (7,743,810) (6,726,583) (15,880,282) (17,687,647) Upfront Swaption Premium N/A 6,250,000 000 6,250,000 000 6,250,000 000 6,250,000 000 Net Benefit (Cost) N/A (1,493,810) (476,583) (9,630,282) (11,437,647) Reduces Debt Service Eliminates Swaps Eliminated Basis Risk Eliminates LOC Risk Eliminates Remarketing Risk 1. Based on current market conditions as of March 18, 2011 Comparison of Financing Risks No No No No No No Yes Yes No No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No No Minimizes Yes 26

Recommended Course of Action Series 2007B COPs (PUT) Issue as soon as practical Amortize principal as previously approved Levelize principal p in areas impacted by QSCB and amortize the remaining portion prior to 2032 Series 2001B COPs (Swaption) Terminate if economically practical less than $10 million, or Terminate swaps and issue fixed rate COPs using blended fixed rate and Put structure If swap terminations are large, let swaps be exercised and issue variable obligations 27