U.S. Monetary Policy: A Case for Caution

Similar documents
Assessing the Risk of Yield Curve Inversion: An Update

Remarks on the 2018 U.S. Macroeconomic Outlook

Assessing the Risk of Yield Curve Inversion

How to Extend the U.S. Expansion: A Suggestion

What Is the Best Strategy for Extending the U.S. Economy s Expansion?

When Will U.S. Inflation Return to Target?

More on Modern Monetary Policy Rules

Perspectives on 2019 Monetary Policy

The Yield Curve and Monetary Policy in 2018

R-Star Wars: The Phantom Menace

Time Consistency and Fed Policy

Yield Curve and Predicted GDP Growth, September 2017

An Illustrative Calculation of r

A Primer on Price Level Targeting in the U.S.

The U.S. Macroeconomic Outlook

The U.S. Economic Situation and Recent Monetary Policy Developments

Does Low Inflation Justify a Zero Policy Rate?

Some Considerations for U.S. Monetary Policy Normalization

An Update on the Tapering Debate

Still Very Accommodative

Living Standards across U.S. Metropolitan Statistical Areas

QE2 in Five Easy Pieces

The U.S. Economy: An Optimistic Outlook, But With Some Important Risks

James Bullard. 30 June St. Louis, MO

Four Questions for Current Monetary Policy

How Far Is the FOMC from Its Goals?

Ghosts of Forecasts Past and Future

The FOMC: Ahead on Results, Behind on Rates

U.S. INTEREST RATES CHARTBOOK MARCH U.S. Interest Rates. Chartbook. March 2017

U.S. Monetary Policy: Still Appropriate

Threading the Needle. Esther L. George President and Chief Executive Officer Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City

Should we worry about the yield curve?

Perspectives on the Current Stance of Monetary Policy

Should We Worry About the Yield Curve?

Is the Flattening Yield Curve Sending a Message?

Commodity Prices, Inflation Targeting, and U.S. Monetary Policy

Non-Uniform Currencies and Exchange Rate Chaos

Power in the Yield Curve

A Singular Achievement of Recent Monetary Policy

Monetary Policy Options in a Low Policy Rate Environment

ECONOMIC AND MARKET ENVIRONMENT THIRD QUARTER 2018

The Yield Curve and Recession Forecasting

The FRB St Louis New Economic Narrative and Negative Rates

INTRODUCTION TO YIELD CURVES. Amanda Goldman

Two Views of International Monetary Policy Coordination

The Ever Elusive Estimation of R-Star

U.S. Monetary Policy and the Path to Normalization

Chapter 11 The Determination of Aggregate Output, the Price Level, and the Interest Rate

YIELD CURVE INVERSION: A CLEAR BUT UNLIKELY DANGER

The Yield Curve WHAT IT IS AND WHY IT MATTERS. UWA Student Managed Investment Fund ECONOMICS TEAM ALEX DYKES ARKA CHANDA ANDRE CHINNERY

INTRODUCTION TO YIELD CURVES. Amanda Goldman

Fourth Quarter Market Outlook. Jason Bulinski, CFA Donald A. Powell, CFA Joseph Styrna, CFA

Core Inflation and the Business Cycle

SURVEY OF PRIMARY DEALERS

FRBSF Economic Letter

FRBSF Economic Letter

Key Takeaways. What it may mean for investors WEEKLY GUIDANCE ON ECONOMIC AND GEOPOLITICAL EVENTS. Luis Alvarado Investment Strategy Analyst

Economic Environment and FHLB Advance Strategies

Making Sense of Thresholds, Triggers, Twists, and Timelines

Current Economic Conditions and Selected Forecasts

Monetary Policy Frameworks

Vanguard: The yield curve inversion and what it means for investors

The U.S. Economy in the Aftermath of the Financial Crisis

James Bullard. 13 January St. Louis, Missouri

Monetary Policy as the Economy Approaches the Fed s Dual Mandate

Are We There Yet? The U.S. Economy and Monetary Policy. Remarks by

THE AD (AGGREGATE DEMAND) / AS (AGGREGATE SUPPLY) MACRO MODEL

Economic recovery dashboard

What Determines the Level of Interest Rates

Low Inflation and the Symmetry of the 2 Percent Target

The Economic & Financial Outlook

Views on the Economy and Price-Level Targeting

The Flattening Yield Curve: Should We Be Concerned?

2018 Economic Outlook 3Q Update

In This Issue: June 2013 (May 10, 2013-June 11, 2013)

Yield Curve Inversion: Not What it Appears

The Mid-Year Economic Forecast. June 20, 2018

Cavanal Hill Fixed Income Insights 4 th Quarter, 2017

FRBSF Economic Letter

Monetary Policymaking in Today s Environment: Finding Policy Space in a Low-Rate World

Report No st July Andrew Smithers.

10-Year Treasury Yield Upshifts past 3% as Fear of Curve Inversion Grows

RESPONSES TO SURVEY OF

Advisory Service. Trends. January 2019 Research Report

Global Macroeconomic Outlook March 2016

U.S. Monetary Policy: Recent Developments

General Economic Outlook Recession! Will it be Short and Shallow?

The Recent Reduction in Global Macroeconomic Uncertainty

Gauging Current Conditions:

U.S. Slack Keeps Shrinking, Slowed But Not Stopped By Global Headwinds; Case For Fed Tightening Builds

Illinois Economic and Fiscal Policy Report

MBA Forecast Commentary Joel Kan

RESPONSES TO SURVEY OF

Leumi. Global Economics Monthly Review. Arie Tal, Research Economist. May 8, The Finance Division, Economics Department. leumiusa.

Data Dependence and U.S. Monetary Policy. Remarks by. Richard H. Clarida. Vice Chairman. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

Economic Outlook. Lauren Bresnahan, Ph.D. Deputy Chief Economist, KPMG May 17, 2018

Early Observations on Gradual Monetary Policy Normalization

Getting ahead of the (yield) curve

A New Characterization of the U.S. Macroeconomic and Monetary Policy Outlook 1

California Association of Joint Powers Authorities

Transcription:

U.S. Monetary Policy: A Case for Caution James Bullard President and CEO Springfield Area Chamber of Commerce Springfield Business Development Corp. Meeting May 11, 2018 Springfield, Mo. Any opinions expressed here are my own and do not necessarily reflect those of the Federal Open Market Committee. 1

Introduction 2

The monetary policy situation U.S. monetary policy has been normalizing during the last 2½ years. o The Federal Reserve s balance sheet has been shrinking relative to U.S. gross domestic product (GDP). o The Fed s policy rate the federal funds rate target has been increasing relative to policy rates in key foreign economies. 3

Fed s balance sheet has been shrinking Sources: Federal Reserve Board, Bureau of Economic Analysis and author s calculations. Last observation: March 2018. 4

Fed policy rate increasing versus ECB and BoJ Sources: Federal Reserve Board, European Central Bank and Bank of Japan. Last observation: Week of May 2, 2018. 5

Today s key monetary policy question How far can the Fed go along the current normalization path? o This talk offers some reasons for caution in raising the policy rate further given current macroeconomic conditions. 6

Five reasons for caution I will discuss five reasons why I think caution may be justified in deciding whether to raise the policy rate further in the near term. These reasons relate to the following areas: o Inflation expectations o The neutral policy rate o The flattening yield curve o Room to grow business investment o Labor markets in equilibrium 7

1. Inflation Expectations Remain Low 8

Inflation expectations still low Market-based measures of inflation expectations remain centered below the Federal Open Market Committee s 2 percent target, inhibiting the Committee s ability to maintain the credibility of the target. * Technical matter: o The market-based measures are for CPI inflation, and so we adjust them downward somewhat to roughly translate into PCE inflation. o Historically, PCE inflation has run somewhat lower than CPI inflation. * The inflation target is in terms of the annual change in the price index for personal consumption expenditures (PCE). 9

Inflation expectations remain a bit low Sources: Federal Reserve Board and author s calculations. Last observations: May 8 (breakeven inflation rates) and May 4, 2018. 10

Bottom line for inflation expectations Market-based inflation expectations can be interpreted as saying that financial markets do not believe the Fed will quite hit the PCE-based inflation target, even over a period as long as the next five years. This is a market judgment that already prices in all current macroeconomic developments, including a market expectation of future Fed policy, which tends to be more dovish than the Committee s policy rate outlook. * This suggests that financial markets believe there is currently little inflationary pressure in the U.S. * The median appropriate policy rate path projections from the March 2018 Summary of Economic Projections are as follows: 2.1% (end of 2018), 2.9% (end of 2019), 3.4% (end of 2020) and 2.9% (longer run). 11

2. The Current Policy Rate Is Neutral 12

Policy rate at neutral The Fed s policy rate setting is likely neutral today, putting neither upward nor downward pressure on inflation. This suggests that it is not necessary to change the policy rate to keep inflation at target. 13

The trend short-term safe real rate I discussed the trend short-term safe real interest rate, the so-called r-star, at a conference earlier this year under the title R-Star Wars. * That talk described the longer-term trends in short-term safe real interest rates, which are independent of Fed actions. Those trends were described as driven by at least three factors: productivity growth, labor force growth and the demand for safe assets. All three trend factors are pushing the real interest rate to low levels relative to historical experience since the 1980s. * See J. Bullard, R-Star Wars: The Phantom Menace, remarks delivered at the 34 th Annual NABE Economic Policy Conference, Feb. 26, 2018. 14

The trend short-term safe real rate is low The level of the trend short-term safe real rate, r-star, is a starting point for where the nominal policy rate should appropriately be set. The R-Star Wars analysis suggests that r-star remains in negative territory. That analysis also suggests that the nominal policy rate set by the FOMC is already pressing against the upper bound of a neutral setting. 15

The trend short-term safe real rate remains negative Sources: Federal Reserve Board, FRB of Dallas and author s calculations. Last observation: 2018-Q1. 16

3. The Yield Curve Is Relatively Flat 17

The slope of the yield curve The U.S. nominal yield curve has been flattening since 2014. * o The spread between 10-year and one-year Treasury yields was close to 300 basis points at the beginning of 2014. o That same spread is currently (week of May 2) only 72 basis points. The flattening is due to rising short-term yields vis-à-vis relatively stable or slowly rising long-term yields. * See J. Bullard, The U.S. Economy Three Months into 2018, remarks delivered at the Arkansas Bankers Association & Arkansas State Bank Department s Day with the Commissioner, April 4, 2018. 18

Nominal yield curve flattening Sources: Federal Reserve Board and author s calculations. Last observation: Week of May 2, 2018. 19

Flattening due to rising short-term rates Sources: Federal Reserve Board and author s calculations. Last observation: Week of May 2, 2018. 20

Possible yield curve inversion It is possible that the nominal yield curve will invert sometime in the next year. If the yield curve does invert, research by the San Francisco Fed suggests that the signal of an impending economic downturn would be strong. * In my view, it is unnecessary for the FOMC to be so aggressive as to invert the yield curve. * See M.D. Bauer and T.M. Mertens, Economic Forecasts with the Yield Curve, FRB of San Francisco Economic Letter 2018-07, March 5, 2018. 21

4. Business Investment Has Room to Grow 22

Investment rates have been low During the last decade, the investment component of U.S. GDP has been disappointingly low. The corporate tax reform recently signed into law was meant in part to address the dearth of investment. To the extent the corporate tax reform is successful today and over the next few years, the economy could grow more rapidly without inflationary side effects. For this reason, I would caution against translating faster real GDP growth into increased inflationary pressures. The following chart suggests that current investment rates remain below levels associated with expansions in the past. 23

Investment share of GDP remains low Sources: Bureau of Economic Analysis and author s calculations. Last observation: 2018-Q1. The shaded areas indicate NBER recessions. 24

5. Labor Markets Are in Equilibrium 25

Labor markets in equilibrium Labor markets were dislocated by many measures during the aftermath of the 2007-2009 recession. It has taken many years for those dislocations to dissipate. We could now describe the U.S. labor market as approximately being in equilibrium. This means that, after many years, the suppliers of labor (households) are on the same footing in the labor market as the employers of labor (firms). This is an appropriate situation that the Fed should not disturb. 26

Labor markets and inflation Labor market outcomes are not tightly associated with inflation. The compensation paid to hire and retain workers is a relative price. When this compensation increases, firms have increased incentives to substitute away from labor and toward capital investment. This effect keeps the labor market in equilibrium without inflationary consequences. The empirical relationship between labor market outcomes and inflation has been weak in recent years. 27

Conclusion 28

Summary In this talk, I have outlined five reasons for caution in raising the policy rate further based on the current macroeconomic situation. 29

1. Inflation expectations are still low First, inflation expectations on a PCE basis remain centered somewhat below the Committee s 2 percent target, inhibiting the Committee s ability to maintain the credibility of the target. By keeping the policy rate steady, the FOMC may be able to appropriately re-center inflation expectations at the target outcome for the next several years. 30

2. Policy rate setting is neutral Second, the Committee s current policy rate setting is already pushing against the upper bound of the neutral level today, according to my R-Star Wars analysis. It is not necessary to go above the current level since both inflation and inflation expectations are either at or somewhat below target. 31

3. Yield curve inversion is possible Third, the yield curve could invert later this year or early next year if the Committee continues increasing the policy rate and longer-term yields do not move higher. Yield curve inversion is a reliable bearish signal for the U.S. economy, according to recent research by the San Francisco Fed. It is unnecessary to press policy rate normalization to the point of inverting the yield curve since inflation and inflation expectations are either at or below target. 32

4. Investment has room to grow Fourth, investment in the U.S. economy as a fraction of GDP remains low and has room to grow. To the extent corporate tax reform is successful on this dimension now and over the next several years, faster real economic growth may not be associated with higher inflation. 33

5. Labor markets are in equilibrium Fifth, U.S. labor markets were dislocated during the 2007-2009 recession and have now recovered to a state that could be described as equilibrium. It is not necessary to disrupt this equilibrium to keep inflation under control given the current macroeconomic circumstances. To the extent labor compensation rises, firms will have to decide whether to hire more labor or to substitute with capital. This is an equilibrium process, not an inflationary one. 34

Connect With Us James Bullard stlouisfed.org/from-the-president STLOUISFED.ORG Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED) Thousands of data series, millions of users Blogs and Publications News and views about the economy and the Fed Economic Education Resources For every stage of life Community Development Promoting financial stability of families, neighborhoods SOCIAL MEDIA ECONOMY MUSEUM 35