Poverty Assessment Tool Accuracy Submission: Addendum for New Poverty Lines USAID/IRIS Tool for Indonesia Submitted: September 15, 2011

Similar documents
Poverty Assessment Tool Accuracy Submission: Addendum for New Poverty Lines USAID/IRIS Tool for Uganda Submitted: June 28, 2010

Poverty Assessment Tool Accuracy Submission: Addendum for New Poverty Lines USAID/IRIS Tool for East Timor Submitted: September 14, 2011

Poverty Assessment Tool Accuracy Submission: Addendum for New Poverty Lines USAID/IRIS Tool for Albania Submitted: September 14, 2011

Annex 1 to this report provides accuracy results for an additional poverty line beyond that required by the Congressional legislation. 1.

Poverty Assessment Tool Accuracy Submission USAID/IRIS Tool for Mexico Submitted: July 19, 2010

1. Overall approach to the tool development

1. Overall approach to the tool development

Note on Assessment and Improvement of Tool Accuracy

How robust are indicator based poverty assessment tools over time? Empirical evidence from Central Sulawesi, Indonesia

Developing Poverty Assessment Tools based on Principal Component Analysis: Results from Bangladesh, Kazakhstan, Uganda, and Peru

Questions: Question Option 1 Option 2 Option 3. Q1 Does your household have a television? Q2 a mobile telephone? Yes No. Q3 a refrigerator?

PART ONE. Application of Tools to Identify the Poor

Formulating the needs for producing poverty statistics

A PROXY MEANS TEST FOR SRI LANKA

Progress Out of Poverty Index An Overview of Fundamentals and Practical Uses

Nazaire Houssou and Manfred Zeller

DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS. EUI Working Papers ECO 2009/02 DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS. A Test of Narrow Framing and Its Origin.

A 2009 Update of Poverty Incidence in Timor-Leste using the Survey-to-Survey Imputation Method

Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC)

Senegal. EquityTool: Released December 9, Source data: Senegal Continuous DHS 2013

Mexico s Official Multidimensional Poverty Measure: A Comparative Study of Indigenous and Non-Indigenous Populations

Multidimensional Poverty Dynamics: Methodology And Results for 34 Countries

Kecamatan Development Program M a y 2002

Egypt. EquityTool: Released 1 st November Source data: Egypt DHS 2014

A Portrait of Hedge Fund Investors: Flows, Performance and Smart Money

Public Disclosure Authorized. Public Disclosure Authorized. Public Disclosure Authorized. Public Disclosure Authorized

The Impact of Taxation and Public Expenditure on Income Distribution in Indonesia

POVERTY IN TIMOR-LESTE

PRO-POOR TARGETING IN IRAQ Tools for poverty targeting

I. Introduction. Source: CIA World Factbook. Population in the World

Missing Public Funds and Targeting: Evidence from an Anti-Poverty Transfer Program in Indonesia

Appendix A. Additional Results

Common Compensation Terms & Formulas

POVERTY, GROWTH, AND PUBLIC TRANSFERS IN TANZANIA PROGRESS REPORT ON THE NATIONAL SAFETY NET STUDY

Intro to GLM Day 2: GLM and Maximum Likelihood

Identifying Demand for Improved Cookstoves (ICS) in West Timor

PART 4 - ARMENIA: SUBJECTIVE POVERTY IN 2006

Mark Schreiner. 23 August 2015

A Brief Illustration of Regression Analysis in Economics John Bucci. Okun s Law

Ministry of National Development Planning/ National Development Planning Agency (Bappenas) May 6 th 8 th, 2014

Republic of Congo (Brazzaville)

ECO220Y, Term Test #2

Implementation Status & Results Indonesia FOURTH NATIONAL PROGRAM FOR COMMUNITY EMPOWERMENT IN RURAL AREA (PNPM IV) (P122810)

POVERTY ANALYSIS IN MONTENEGRO IN 2013

Shiyuan Chen and Mark Schreiner. 23 April 2009

Analysis of the Holiday Effect

KEY WORDS: Microsimulation, Validation, Health Care Reform, Expenditures

Frequently asked questions (FAQs)

Developing Poverty Assessment Tools

a. Explain why the coefficients change in the observed direction when switching from OLS to Tobit estimation.

Current development of Indonesia s economy. - A short summary -

Multiple regression - a brief introduction

Ethiopia. EquityTool: Released December Source data: Ethiopia 2011 DHS

Review questions for Multinomial Logit/Probit, Tobit, Heckit, Quantile Regressions

Agricultural and Rural Finance Markets in Transition

List of tables List of boxes List of screenshots Preface to the third edition Acknowledgements

CHAPTER 4 DATA ANALYSIS Data Hypothesis

Linear regression model

Access to Credit and Women Entrepreneurship: Evidence from Bangladesh. M. Jahangir Alam Chowdhury University of Dhaka.

Data and Methods in FMLA Research Evidence

Appendix. Table A.1 (Part A) The Author(s) 2015 G. Chakrabarti and C. Sen, Green Investing, SpringerBriefs in Finance, DOI /

The University of Chicago, Booth School of Business Business 41202, Spring Quarter 2017, Mr. Ruey S. Tsay. Solutions to Final Exam

CHAPTER 6 DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION

101: MICRO ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

EVALUATING INDONESIA S UNCONDITIONAL CASH TRANSFER PROGRAM(S) *

CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION

Not your average regression: A practical introduction to quantile regression. James Ellens

Real Estate Ownership by Non-Real Estate Firms: The Impact on Firm Returns

The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy. Village Economies and the Structure of Extended Family Networks

CREDIT RISK MODELING IN R. Logistic regression: introduction

Non-linearities in Simple Regression

The demand for lottery expenditure in Taiwan: a quantile regression approach. Abstract

Risk Analysis. å To change Benchmark tickers:

Over the five year period spanning 2007 and

Growth incidence analysis for non-income welfare indicators: evidence from Ghana and Uganda

Simple Poverty Scorecards

Comment on Counting the World s Poor, by Angus Deaton

FLORIDA COMMISSION ON HURRICANE LOSS PROJECTION METHODOLOGY

Percentiles, STATA, Box Plots, Standardizing, and Other Transformations

Introductory Econometrics for Finance

ONLINE APPENDIX. Do Individual Currency Traders Make Money?

ECON 256: Poverty, Growth & Inequality. Jack Rossbach

Proxy Means Test for Targeting Welfare Benefits in Sri Lanka A WORLD BANK DOCUMENT

Homework Solutions - Lecture 2 Part 2

DHS METHODOLOGICAL REPORTS 15

Question Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Does your household have a refrigerator/freezer? Yes No

Standardized Data Percentiles, Quartiles and Box Plots Grouped Data Skewness and Kurtosis

Comparison of OLS and LAD regression techniques for estimating beta

Contents Part I Descriptive Statistics 1 Introduction and Framework Population, Sample, and Observations Variables Quali

Discussion Paper No. 2003/57. How Responsive is Poverty to Growth? Jed Friedman *

MONTENEGRO. Name the source when using the data

SMALL AREA ESTIMATES OF INCOME: MEANS, MEDIANS

THE INDONESIAN INTER-REGIONAL SOCIAL ACCOUNTING MATRIX FOR FISCAL DECENTRALISATION ANALYSIS *

Per Capita Housing Starts: Forecasting and the Effects of Interest Rate

WHY Do DIFFERENCES IN PROVINCIAL

The Moldovan experience in the measurement of inequalities

IMPLICATIONS OF LOW PRODUCTIVITY GROWTH FOR DEBT SUSTAINABILITY

Questions: Question Option 1 Option 2 Option 3

DYNAMICS OF URBAN INFORMAL

CHAPTER \11 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS, CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION. decades. Income distribution, as reflected in the distribution of household

Transcription:

Poverty Assessment Tool Accuracy Submission: Addendum for New Poverty Lines USAID/IRIS Tool for Indonesia Submitted: September 15, 2011 In order to improve the functionality of the existing PAT for Indonesia, the IRIS Center has updated the tool with the following features: Re-ran the models at the $1.25/day line, using the new purchasing power parity (PPP) rates lines released by the World Bank Calibrated the model to also allow predictions at the $2.50/line Incorporated the prediction models into a CSPro data entry template. This template closely resembles the paper questionnaire and allows the entry, storage, and retrieval of household demographics. The output of the data entry permits poverty prediction at two poverty lines, $1.25 and $2.50. In addition, poverty status at the both lines is cross tabulated with regional location, the household head s characteristics, household size, and housing conditions. This additional information provided is intended for indicative purposes rather than statistical inference. Please see attached document with screenshots of this template. Revised the paper questionnaire to reflect best practice in survey design The data source used for the PAT in Indonesia remains the same as when the tool was originally submitted for certification, as has the general tool construction process, aside from a more rigorous screening process to ensure that the variables are in line with the project s current best practices on practical indicators. Because of these similarities, this document should be viewed as an addendum to the original tool s certification document. The document proceeds by detailing how the new $1.25 PPP was applied and the results at the $1.25/day and $2.50/day lines. Accompanying this document are the revised questionnaire and screenshots of the CSPro data entry template and output. Updating the poverty line The legislation governing the development of USAID tools defines the very poor as either the bottom (poorest) 50 percent of those living below the poverty line established by the national government or those living on the local equivalent of less than the international poverty line ($1.25/day in 2005 PPP terms) 1. The applicable poverty line for USAID tool development is the one that yields the higher household poverty rate for a given country. In Indonesia the applicable threshold is the international poverty line of $1.25/day in 2005 PPP terms. The value of this line at the time of the survey is 127,619 Rupiah per capita per year, indexed to average 2002 prices. This line identifies 28.1% of households in the sample as very poor. 1 The congressional legislation specifies the international poverty line as the equivalent of $1 per day (as calculated using the purchasing power parity (PPP) exchange rate method). USAID and IRIS interpret this to mean the international poverty line used by the World Bank to track global progress toward the Millennium Development Goal of cutting the prevalence of extreme poverty in half by 2015. This poverty line has recently been recalculated by the Bank to accompany new, improved estimates of PPP. The 2002 equivalent of the applicable 2005 PPP rate for Indonesia is 127,619 Rupiah per capita.

Results for $1.25/day model Table 1 summarizes the accuracy results achieved by eight estimation methods in predicting household poverty relative to the new $1.25/day poverty line. The selection of the best model was based on the Balanced Poverty Accuracy Criterion (BPAC) and the Poverty Incidence Error (PIE), along with practicality considerations. 2 For Indonesia, the most accurate method, on the basis of BPAC and PIE, is the 1-step Quantile regression. Table 2 presents a 2x2 matrix of the poverty status predicted by the model versus the true poverty status according to the expenditure benchmark. Table 3 provides the regression results from the $1.25/day model. Table 1: In-sample Accuracy Results for Prediction at the Legislative Poverty Line Indonesia Total Poverty Undercoverage $1.25/day line* Accuracy Accuracy Share of very poor : 28.1% Leakage PIE BPAC Single-step methods -- OLS 78.90 44.80 55.20 20.50-9.60 10.20 Quantile regression (estimation point: 40 78.30 61.00 39.00 39.00 0.00 61.00 percentile) Linear Probability 79.20 45.00 55.00 19.60-9.90 9.60 Probit 79.40 49.40 50.60 23.40-7.60 22.30 Two-step methods -- OLS 29 percentile cutoff 79.40 46.60 53.40 20.50-9.20 13.70 Quantile (estimation points: 40, 12) 29 percentile cutoff 78.60 63.70 36.30 40.60 1.20 59.40 LP 38 percentile cutoff 79.60 51.70 48.30 24.90-6.50 28.20 Probit 38 percentile cutoff 79.50 51.30 48.70 24.80-6.60 27.40 * The $1.25/day poverty line is 127,619 Rupiahs per capita per year. 2 For a detailed discussion of these accuracy criteria, see Note on Assessment and Improvement of Tool Accuracy at www.povertytools.org.

Table 2: Poverty Status of Sample Households, as Estimated by Model and Revealed by the Benchmark Survey Number of true verypoor households (as Number of true not very-poor households (as identified as very-poor by the tool identified as not verypoor by the tool 5,470 3,500 (17.0%) (10.9%) 3,497 19,744 (10.8%) (61.3%) Table 3: Regression Estimates using 1-step Quantile Method for Prediction at the $1.25/day Poverty Line.4 Quantile regression Number of obs = 32,211 Min sum of deviations 9887.476 Pseudo R2 = 0.2606 Variable Intercept 12.5875 0.0287 438.7300 0.0000 12.5313 12.6438 Household size -0.2477 0.0059-42.1700 0.0000-0.2592-0.2362 Household age 0.0097 0.0012 8.1200 0.0000 0.0073 0.0120 Household size squared 0.0146 0.0006 23.9800 0.0000 0.0134 0.0158 Household head age squared -0.0001 0.0000-8.5900 0.0000-0.0001-0.0001 Household lives in Sumatra 0.0863 0.0072 11.9300 0.0000 0.0722 0.1005 Household lives in Nusa Tenggara 0.0191 0.0089 2.1500 0.0320 0.0017 0.0366 Household lives in Kalimantan 0.1752 0.0098 17.8300 0.0000 0.1560 0.1945 Household lives in Sulawesi 0.0077 0.0092 0.8400 0.4010-0.0103 0.0257 Household lives in rural area -0.2126 0.0064-33.0300 0.0000-0.2252-0.2000 Household head has had no education -0.0978 0.0097-10.0500 0.0000-0.1168-0.0787 Household head has completed senior high school 0.1330 0.0074 17.9500 0.0000 0.1185 0.1475 Share of family member with no education -0.2861 0.0200-14.2900 0.0000-0.3254-0.2469 Share of family members who have completed senior high school 0.4840 0.0199 24.3800 0.0000 0.4451 0.5230 Household head widowed -0.0962 0.0098-9.8400 0.0000-0.1154-0.0770

Variable Household leases dwelling 0.0715 0.0125 5.7400 0.0000 0.0470 0.0959 Parents own dwelling -0.0515 0.0114-4.5000 0.0000-0.0739-0.0291 Walls of dwelling are made of wood -0.1189 0.0070-16.9500 0.0000-0.1327-0.1051 Walls of dwelling are made of bamboo -0.1702 0.0091-18.7400 0.0000-0.1880-0.1524 Floors of dwelling are made of dirt -0.1491 0.0080-18.6900 0.0000-0.1648-0.1335 Main source of drinking water is tap water 0.2253 0.0075 29.9700 0.0000 0.2105 0.2400 Main source of drinking water is a water pump 0.1523 0.0083 18.2700 0.0000 0.1359 0.1686 Household shares toilet facility -0.0244 0.0080-3.0400 0.0020-0.0402-0.0087 Main lighting source of light is from an oil lamp -0.1218 0.0086-14.1000 0.0000-0.1387-0.1049 Household owns one or more stalls or shops 0.0958 0.0086 11.1600 0.0000 0.0790 0.1127 Results for $2.50/day model Table 4 summarizes the predictive accuracy results for the $2.50/day poverty line using the Quantile model specification from the $1.25/day poverty line. The indicators are the same as those in the model for the $1.25/day line, but the percentile of estimation and the coefficients of the model were allowed to change (compare Tables 3 and 6). This methodology allows the content and length of the questionnaire to remain the same, but permits greater accuracy in predicting at the $2.50/day poverty line. Table 5 presents a 2x2 matrix of the poverty status predicted by the model versus the true poverty status according to the expenditure benchmark. Table 6 provides the regression results from the $2.50/day model. Table 4: Accuracy Results Obtained for Prediction at the $2.50/day Poverty Line Indonesia $2.50/day Line* Share of very poor : 74.9% Single-step methods Total Accuracy Poverty Accuracy Undercoverage Leakage PIE BPAC Quantile regression 80.30 87.05 12.95 13.26 0.23 86.74 (estimation point : 60%) * The $2.50/day line is 127,619 Rupiah per capita per year in 2002 prices.

Table 5: Poverty Status of Sample Households, as Estimated by Model and Revealed by the Benchmark Survey, at $2.50 Poverty Line Number of true poor households (as Number of true not poor households (as identified as poor by the tool identified as not poor by the tool 21,071 3,136 (65.4%) (9.7%) 3,210 4,794 (10.0%) (14.9%) Table 6: Regression Estimates using 1-step Quantile Method for Prediction at the $2.50/day Poverty Line.60 Quantile regression Number of obs = 32,211 Min sum of deviations 10368.08 Pseudo R2 = 0.2751 Variable Intercept 12.8391 0.0360 356.2800 0.0000 12.7685 12.9097 Household size -0.2697 0.0071-37.8100 0.0000-0.2837-0.2557 Household age 0.0105 0.0015 7.0800 0.0000 0.0076 0.0135 Household size squared 0.0167 0.0007 23.3400 0.0000 0.0153 0.0182 Household head age squared -0.0001 0.0000-7.3600 0.0000-0.0001-0.0001 Household lives in Sumatra 0.1018 0.0089 11.3800 0.0000 0.0843 0.1194 Household lives in Nusa Tenggara 0.0393 0.0110 3.5800 0.0000 0.0178 0.0608 Household lives in Kalimantan 0.1861 0.0121 15.3400 0.0000 0.1623 0.2099 Household lives in Sulawesi 0.0203 0.0113 1.7900 0.0730-0.0019 0.0425 Household lives in rural area -0.2478 0.0077-32.1700 0.0000-0.2629-0.2327 Household head has had no education -0.1073 0.0119-9.0000 0.0000-0.1306-0.0839 Household head has completed senior high school 0.1323 0.0092 14.3100 0.0000 0.1142 0.1504 Percent of family member with no education -0.3093 0.0244-12.6500 0.0000-0.3572-0.2614 Percent of family members who have completed senior high school 0.4432 0.0243 18.2200 0.0000 0.3955 0.4909

Variable Household head widowed -0.0938 0.0120-7.8100 0.0000-0.1173-0.0702 Household leases dwelling 0.0771 0.0150 5.1500 0.0000 0.0478 0.1065 Parents own dwelling -0.0550 0.0141-3.9100 0.0000-0.0825-0.0274 Walls of dwelling are made of wood -0.1317 0.0085-15.5200 0.0000-0.1483-0.1151 Walls of dwelling are made of bamboo -0.1910 0.0110-17.3700 0.0000-0.2126-0.1695 Floors of dwelling are made of dirt -0.1657 0.0097-17.0800 0.0000-0.1847-0.1467 Main source of drinking water is tap water 0.2547 0.0091 28.1100 0.0000 0.2369 0.2725 Main source of drinking water is a water pump 0.1609 0.0101 15.9500 0.0000 0.1412 0.1807 Household shares toilet facility -0.0494 0.0097-5.0700 0.0000-0.0686-0.0303 Main lighting source of light is from an oil lamp -0.1386 0.0106-13.0200 0.0000-0.1595-0.1177 Household owns one or more stalls or shops 0.0938 0.0105 8.9300 0.0000 0.0732 0.1144