Emergency Management. December 16, 2010

Similar documents
Survey of Hazus-MH: FEMA s Tool for Natural Hazard Loss Estimation

Overview of HAZUS for Earthquake Loss Estimation. September 6, 2012

Overview of HAZUS. December 6, 2011

Integrating Hazus into the Flood Risk Assessment

Mapping Flood Risk in the Upper Fox River Basin:

National Capitol Region HAZUS User Group Call

Hazus: Estimated Damage and Economic Losses. South Carolina United States

Leveraging HAZUS for Risk Assessment Analysis within Risk MAP

Garfield County NHMP:

ANNEX B: TOWN OF BLUE RIVER

Avon. Challenges. Estimated Damages from 100- Year Flood

Use of FEMA Non regulatory Flood Risk Products in Planning

BGC Project Memorandum

National Capitol Region HAZUS User Group Call

Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan. Data Collection Questionnaire. For Local Governments

VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT

Seismic Benefit Cost Analysis

Risk Assessment Training Cape May County, NJ. FEMA REGION II December 13, :00 pm

Flood Risk Assessment in the

Economic Analysis of a Hurricane Event In Hillsborough County, Florida. Category 3 and 5 Hurricane Events

Multi-Hazard Damage and Loss Estimates to Buildings and Lifelines. M. Capozzo, A. Rizzi, A. Barbosa, G.P. Cimellaro

APPENDIX 1 FEMA MITIGATION GRANT PROGRAMS

The Citadel. Multi-Hazard Mitigation Disaster Resistant University Plan

Flood Risk Products. New Techniques for Identifying and Communicating Flood Risk

Planning for SLR Resiliency in Virginia Beach

Comparing HAZUS Flood Loss Estimates Across Hazard Identification Methods and Building Stock Inventory Data. Albion Township Dane County, Wisconsin

Challenges in Mitigation of NYU Langone Medical Center after Hurricane Sandy

Non Regulatory Risk MAP Products Flood Depth and Probability Grids

4 TH ANNUAL CAPE COASTAL CONFERENCE. Adaptation Planning, Environmental Economics and Community Engagement

Challenges in Mitigation of NYU Langone Medical Center after Hurricane Sandy

Truckloads (at 25 tons/truck) of building debris 90

Findings/Debrief Meeting September 9, CDOT R4 Headquarters Big Thompson Conference Room W 10 th St. Greeley, CO 80634

PHASE 2 HAZARD IDENTIFICATION AND RISK ASSESSMENT

Simsbury. Challenges Capitol Region Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan Update - Page 356

Risk Assessment Training Union County, NJ. FEMA REGION II February 17, :00 am

Sussex County All Hazard Mitigation Plan. Plan Executive Summary

HAZUS th Annual Conference

EVALUATING OPTIMAL STRATEGIES TO IMPROVE EARTHQUAKE PERFORMANCE FOR COMMUNITIES

PART 3 LOCAL MITIGATION PLANS

Challenges. Estimated Damages from 100-Year Flood

ASFPM Partnerships for Statewide Mitigation Actions. Alicia Williams GIS and HMP Section Manager, Amec Foster Wheeler June 2016

Town of Montrose Annex

Delaware Bay / River Coastal Flood Risk Study. FEMA REGION II and III September 19, 2012

10/23/2014. Presented by: Erike Young, MPPA, CSP, ARM-E. Public Sector Disaster Planning/Emergency Response

The AIR Typhoon Model for South Korea

According to the U.S. Geological

A Multihazard Approach to Building Safety: Using FEMA Publication 452 as a Mitigation Tool

Effective Flood Risk Assessment Methodologies

9.10 HEIDELBERG TOWNSHIP

Catastrophe Risk Engineering Solutions

New Tools for Mitigation & Outreach. Louie Greenwell Stantec

G318 Local Mitigation Planning Workshop. Module 2: Risk Assessment. Visual 2.0

Kentucky Risk MAP It s not Map Mod II

in coordination with Peoria County, Planning and Zoning Department

Wildfire and Flood Hazards, Using GIS Tools to Assess Risk

SECTION 3: VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT

C o p e r n i c u s E m e r g e n c y M a n a g e m e n t S e r v i c e f o r R i s k p l a n n i n g a n d R e c o v e r y

Overview of Capabilities and Current Limitations

Implementing risk-based asset management strategies

RISK MANAGEMENT NEXT GENERATION

Mitigation Success Publications

9.2 ALBURTIS BOROUGH. This section presents the jurisdictional annex for Alburtis Borough. A. HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT

The AIR Coastal Flood Model for Great Britain

Vision to Action: Creating and Using a Flood Risk Assessment for Identifying Mitigation Options

Modeling Extreme Event Risk

Pre-Earthquake, Emergency and Contingency Planning August 2015

Situation: the need for non-structural flood risk reduction measures

A GIS BASED EARTHQUAKE LOSSES ASSESSMENT AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE SYSTEM FOR DAQING OIL FIELD

SECTION 4: HAZARD IDENTIFICATION AND RISK ASSESSMENT 156

Preface UPPER SPOKANE WATERSHED RISK REPORT KOOTENAI COUNTY, IDAHO

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Greater Greenburgh Planning Area Planning Process

TERREBONNE PARISH HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN UPDATE

APPENDIX H TOWN OF FARMVILLE. Hazard Rankings. Status of Mitigation Actions. Building Permit Data. Future Land Use Map. Critical Facilities Map

Upper Joachim Creek Public Survey on Potential Flood Risk Reduction

10/5/2015. What Makes a Sound Floodplain Management Program? What are the Flood Problems in your Community?

*How Federal Policy. Causes Flood Disasters. Leslie A. Bond, CFM LA Bond Associates

7. Understand effect of multiple annual exposures e.g., 30-yr period and multiple independent locations yr event over 30 years 3%

Flood Hazards & Infrastructure Risk in the Lower Mainland Towards a Regional Strategy for Risk Reduction

TERRORISM MODELING. Chris Folkman, Senior Director, Product. Copyright 2015 Risk Management Solutions, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Perspectives on Earthquake Risk Assessment and Management in Trinidad and Tobago

CHAPTER THREE Natural Hazard Mitigation Strategy

AIR Worldwide Analysis: Exposure Data Quality

Understanding CCRIF s Hurricane, Earthquake and Excess Rainfall Policies

September Three Steps for Implementing a Complete Flood Management Plan

Risk Assessment Framework. Levee Ready Columbia

Proactive Location Identification for Emergency Response and 911 Purposes

Michael Taylor, PE, CFM Project Manager, AECOM August 25, 2015

East Hartford. Challenges

Natural Hazard Mitigation Saves:

PLANNING PROCESS. Table of Contents. List of Tables

SECTION 6 - RANGE OF ALTERNATIVE MITIGATION ACTIONS CONSIDERED

Risk, Mitigation, & Planning

Adaptation Practices and Lessons Learned

ASFPM RECOMMENDED TASK FORCE ACTIONS

Chapter 10 Mitigation

Flood Risk Outreach Tools for Georgia Communities. GAFM 10 th Annual Conference Presented By: Jarrett Mattli

T-318. Hazard Mitigation Section TDEM Recovery, Mitigation, and Standards

National Capitol Region HAZUS User Group Call. December 19, :00 AM EST

Hurricane Matthew. As of August 24, 2018, the County has received $76,596 in reimbursements from

Federal Grants Provide $6 Benefit for Each $1 Invested

Transcription:

Applications of Hazus-MH for Emergency Management December 16, 2010

What is Hazus-MH? Free ArcGIS extension Facilitates a risk-based approach to mitigation Identifies and visually displays hazards and vulnerabilities Calculates scientifically-defensible damages, economic losses, and mitigation benefits

How does Hazus-MH Support Emergency Management? IDENTIFY vulnerable areas ASSESS level of readiness and preparedness to deal with a disaster before disaster occurs ESTIMATE potential losses from specific hazard events DECIDE on how to allocate resources for most effective and efficient response and recovery PRIORITIZE mitigation measures that need to be implemented to reduce future losses (what if)

How Hazus-MH Estimates Losses Produces maps, tables, and reports Analyzes social and economic impacts Considers what is at risk Identifies hazard Analyzes physical landscape

Damage/Loss Functions Assess damage and losses based on hazard conditions Example Hurricane model has 4,818 unique building categories 45 damage/loss functions for each building model Total of 216 810 unique Total of 216,810 unique damage/loss curves

Hazus-MH Output Physical Impacts Physical Impacts Social Impacts Economic impacts Social Impacts Economic Impacts

Hazus-MH Output Direct Damage age General Building Stock Essential Facilities High Potential Loss Facilities Transportation Systems Utility Systems Induced Damage Fire Following Hazardous Materials Release Direct Losses Indirect Losses Earthquake Ground Shaking Ground Failure Flood Frequency Depth Discharge Velocity Hurricane Wind Pressure Missile Rain Debris Generation Cost of Repair Income Loss Crop Damage Casualties Shelter Needs Supply Shortages Sales Decline Opportunity Costs Economic Loss Generic Output

Results Formats Tables Maps Reports

Supported Hazards Hurricanes Riverine and Coastal Floods Earthquakes

User Levels Level 2 Level 3 Input hazard specific data Combinations of local and default hazard, building, and ddamage data Required User Effort and Sophistication Level 1 Default hazard, inventory, and damage information

Inventory Components Aggregate Inventory Demographics General Building Stock broken down by type (how constructed) and occupancy (how used) Site-Specific Inventory Aggregate g Hazard Specific Inventory (both aggregate and site specific) Site Specific

Integrating glocal Data Comprehensive Data Management System

Hurricane Model Overview

Supported States Model includes 22 gulf and east coast states as well as Hawaii

Scenario Options Individual storms User-defined Historical Probabilistic

Direct Physical Damage Essential Facilities Loss of Use (Days) Damage State Probability bilit

Debris Building Debris Wood and Masonry Steel and Concrete Tree Blowdown Tree Debris Eligible Tree Debris Building density, length of roads, and census block shapes Trees downed in close proximity to streets, highways, h or buildings make up the great majority of trees brought to the curb for collection and ddisposal

Direct Economic Losses General Building Stock Loss Building Losses Structural Non-structural Content Business Inventory Business Interruption Losses Wage Income Rental & Relocation Proprietor Economic Losses from a Hazus-MH Simulated Hurricane Scenario

Direct Social Losses Shelter Number of Displaced Households Temporary Housing Requirements Based on Demographic Considerations [Ethnicity, Income, Age, Ownership] Shelter Camp during the 1906 San Francisco Earthquake

Flood Model Overview

Scenario Options Return Period Discharge Value Flood Information Tool Input Quick Look Enhanced Quick Look User Provided Depth Grid HEC-RAS

Depth-Damage Curves Damage to buildings and infrastructure is estimated using depthdamage curves Damage as % of replacement cost 0% 50% 100% 0 ft 5 ft 10 ft 15 ft Depth of water

Results General Building Stock Results By Amount of Damage occupancy, building type (sq. ft.) by count By Dollar Losses full and depreciated replacement value building, content, t and inventory losses costs of relocation, wage, income, and rental losses direct employee output losses and employment loss (days)

Results Essential facilities Building and content losses Functionality assessment (yes/no) Restoration time to 100% functionality Lifeline losses (for selected components) Losses to structures and equipment Functionality assessment (yes/no)

Results Vehicle Losses Agriculture Losses Shelter Requirements Indirect Economic Losses Income and employment impact with Income and employment impact with and without aid by market sector

Earthquake Model Overview

Scenario Options User defined events Historic events Probabilistic events

Direct Physical Damage Structural and nonstructural damage estimates for buildings Damage state probability counts and losses Technical Manual chapter 5 describes the conditions that exist at each damage state by building type

Direct Physical Damage Essential Facilities Restoration Time to 100% Functionality Damage State t Probability bilit Damage states are described in chapters 5 and 6 of Technical Manual

U tility y D am ageg Pipeline and Facility Damages, Losses, and Functionality for Potable Water, Waste Water, Oil Systems and Natural Gas. Functionality at 1, 3, 7, 14, 30 and 90 days Number of households without Potable Water and Electricity

Transportation Damage Highway, Railway, Light Rail Bridge, Segment and Tunnel Losses, Damages and Functionality Bus, Port, and Ferry Facility Damage, Loss, and Functionality Airport Runway and Facility Damage, Loss and Functionality

Induced Physical Damage Fire Following Number of Ignitions Extent t of Burned Areas Debris Generation Wood and Masonry Steel and Concrete

Direct Economic Losses Building Losses (GBS) Structural Non-structural Content Business Inventory Business Interruption Wage Income Rental & Relocation Proprietor Lifelines Direct Cost of Repair

Social Losses - Casualties By severity level By time of day (2 am, 2 pm, 5 pm) Severity 1 - No Hospitalizations Severity 2 Hospitalization Severity 3 Life Threatening Severity 4 - Fatality

Social Losses - Shelter Number of Displaced Households Temporary Housing Requirements

Indirect Economic Losses Modeling of 10-30,000 Economic Sectors -20,000 IMPLAN Data Income Changes vs. Time Employment Changes vs. Time e Million] [$ Inco Income Change Chang [$ Million] -10,000 0 10,000 20,000 30,000 Agriculture Construction Agriculture Construction 40,000 000 FIRE Government FIRE Government 50,000 Manufacturing Mining Manufacturing Mining 60,000 Miscellaneous Service Miscellaneous Service Trade Transportation Trade Transportation 70,000 000 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Economic Sectors Elapsed Time Modeled after Earthquake in Hazus

What is CDMS? CDMS is a tool developed by FEMA to support integration of locally developed inventory data into the Hazus-MH loss estimation process. Pi Primary functions Support transfer of data into and out of the master state databases Provide validation of user supplied data Allow users to query and export inventory information

User Groups Latest news User feedback User group contacts http://www.hazus.org and http://www.usehazus.com

Training Classroom Courses ArcGIS for Emergency Managers Basic Hazus-MH Hazus-MH for Floods Hazus-MH for Earthquakes Hazus-MH for Hurricanes Using Hazus for Risk Assessment Comprehensive Data Management for Hazus-MH Hazus for Floodplain Managers Using Hazus for Disaster Operations http://www.fema.gov/plan/prevent/hazus/hz_trngconf.shtm Virtual Courses Seven courses now available on the ESRI Virtual Campus http://www.fema.gov/plan/prevent/hazus/hz_virtualtraining.shtm

Thanks for your attention! http://www.fema.gov/plan /prevent/hazus/