DEVELOPING A GROUP CAPITAL CALCULATION

Similar documents
NAIC OWN RISK AND SOLVENCY ASSESSMENT (ORSA) GUIDANCE MANUAL

Enterprise Risk Management

Guidance paper on the use of internal models for risk and capital management purposes by insurers

Economic Capital: Recent Market Trends and Best Practices for Implementation

Solvency II Insights for North American Insurers. CAS Centennial Meeting Damon Paisley Bill VonSeggern November 10, 2014

Contingent Deferred Annuities

NAIC OWN RISK AND SOLVENCY ASSESSMENT (ORSA) GUIDANCE MANUAL

2012 Conference: Connecting Theory With Practice" 22 nd Annual CAA Conference Sheraton, Nassau, Bahamas November 14-16, 2012

Economic Capital in a Canadian Context

Article from: Risk Management. March 2014 Issue 29

US Life Insurer Stress Testing

Exploring the New Era of ORSA Enterprise Risk Management (ERM)/ Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA) Committee

A.M. Best s New Risk Management Standards

ORSA: Prospective Solvency Assessment and Capital Projection Modelling

Academy Presentation to NAIC ORSA Implementation (E) Subgroup

ERM Implementation and the Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA)

Advanced Methods in Insurance Capital Requirements

Session 3B, Stochastic Investment Planning. Presenters: Paul Manson, CFA. SOA Antitrust Disclaimer SOA Presentation Disclaimer

Christina Urias SMI Task Force Chair Director, Arizona Department of Insurance

ORSA An International Development

Framework for a New Standard Approach to Setting Capital Requirements. Joint Committee of OSFI, AMF, and Assuris

Overview of Results of ERM 1 Assessment based on ORSA 2 Reports and ERM Hearings

Longevity Risk Task Force Update

The New Risk-Based Capital

Sara Richman, Vice President, Products, Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance Company

Risk management. Directors report: Operating and financial review. Risk management

UK Banks and Life Insurers

NAIC s Center for Insurance Policy and Research Summit: Exploring Insurers Liabilities

ERM, the New Regulatory Requirements and Quantitative Analyses

Subject ST9 Enterprise Risk Management Syllabus

ALM processes and techniques in insurance

Katie Campbell, FSA, MAAA

Southeastern Actuaries Conference 2012 Annual Meeting. Jeffrey S. Schlinsog, CFA, FSA, MAAA

Re: Comments on ORSA Guidance in the Financial Analysis and Financial Condition Examiners Handbooks

Actuarial Roles under the Solvency II Framework Dr. Huijuan Liu

Embedding Stress Testing as Part of an Integrated Risk Management Framework

29th India Fellowship Seminar

Investment Symposium March F7: Investment Implications of a Principal-Based Approach to Capital. Moderator Ross Bowen

Ensuring Capital Adequacy for Captives

SOLVENCY ADVISORY COMMITTEE QUÉBEC CHARTERED LIFE INSURERS

ERM and ORSA Assuring a Necessary Level of Risk Control

LONGEVITY RISK TASK FORCE UPDATE

INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF INSURANCE SUPERVISORS

Article from Financial Reporter. December 2017 Issue 110

Making Risk Models Relevant

Statement of Guidance for Licensees seeking approval to use an Internal Capital Model ( ICM ) to calculate the Prescribed Capital Requirement ( PCR )

Comments on the Corporate Governance for Risk Management Act

Contingent Deferred Annuities Solvency & Risk Management Issues

RED 2.1 & 4.2: Quantifying Risk Exposure for ORSA. Moderator: Presenters: Lesley R. Bosniack, CERA, FCAS, MAAA

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Lombardi, Chapter 1, Overview of Valuation Requirements. A- 22 to A- 26

Risk-Neutral Valuation in Practice: Implementing a Hedging Strategy for Segregated Fund Guarantees

Use of Internal Models for Determining Required Capital for Segregated Fund Risks (LICAT)

Solvency Assessment and Management: Steering Committee Position Paper 89 1 (v 2) Calculation of SCR on total balance sheet

Guideline. Own Risk and Solvency Assessment. Category: Sound Business and Financial Practices. No: E-19 Date: November 2015

Practical Uses of Local Reporting in Taiwan. Kitty Ching 金肖雲 VP, Actuarial Risk Management

Moderator: Michael L. Kaster, FSA, MAAA. Presenters: Anna V. Apgar, FSA, MAAA Dan Kim, FSA, CERA, MAAA

Principle Based Reserves Ohio Chapter IASA. November 21, 2016 Columbus, OH

INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF INSURANCE SUPERVISORS

Stress Testing Beyond DCAT

Stochastic Modeling Workshop Introduction

International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) Update Life

Session 31PD: Life Insurance Capital Framework in Canada. Moderator: Presenters: Ritchie Hok FSA Lisa Marie Peterson FSA,FCIA

GUERNSEY NEW RISK BASED INSURANCE SOLVENCY REQUIREMENTS

A. General comments. October 27, 2012

PILLAR 3 Disclosures

Dynamic Solvency Test

Exam ERM-GC. Date: Tuesday, October 30, 2018 Time: 8:30 a.m. 12:45 p.m. INSTRUCTIONS TO CANDIDATES. Recognized by the Canadian Institute of Actuaries.

BERMUDA MONETARY AUTHORITY DISCUSSION PAPER ON THE OWN RISK AND SOLVENCY ASSESSMENT PROCESS

Hong Kong RBC First Quantitative Impact Study

Re: Proposed Actuarial Standard of Practice, Capital Adequacy Assessment for Insurers, Second Exposure Draft

Re: VAIWG Exposure of Proposed Changes to Actuarial Guideline 43 and C-3 Phase II

ILA LRM Model Solutions Fall Learning Objectives: 1. The candidate will demonstrate an understanding of the principles of Risk Management.

Session 021 TS - U.S. Statutory Update: Annuities. Moderator: Simpa A. Baiye, FSA MAAA

LONGEVITY RISK TASK FORCE UPDATE (LRTF)

Managing With-Profit Portfolio using a Stochastic Approach

Subject SP9 Enterprise Risk Management Specialist Principles Syllabus

IFRS 4 and its Implication to HK and China s Insurance Industry

Solvency II Risk Management Forecasting. Presenter(s): Peter M. Phillips

ICS Valuation. Achieving a Single, Coherent Discounting Approach through Own Assets with Guard Rails ( OAG )

2018 CAPITAL AND SOLVENCY RETURN STRESS/SCENARIO ANALYSIS CLASS 3A

Standardized Approach for Calculating the Solvency Buffer for Market Risk. Joint Committee of OSFI, AMF, and Assuris.

RISK BASED CAPITAL AND SOLVENCY

2014 Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA) Feedback Pilot Project Observations of the Group Solvency Issues (E) Working Group

An Introduction to Solvency II

Disclosure of European Embedded Value as of March 31, 2016

OWN RISK AND SOLVENCY ASSESSMENT. ERM Seminar Compliance All Dealing from the same deck now

Solvency II implications for Asian life insurers

NAIC VA Reserve and Capital Reform: Perspectives at the Final Turn

Mizuho Securities UK Holdings Ltd Basel III Pillar 3 Disclosures 31 March 2015

Economic Capital Based on Stress Testing

ECONOMIC CAPITAL MODELING CARe Seminar JUNE 2016

Modernising Insurance Solvency Regimes Key Features of Selected Markets A STUDY BY THE GENEVA ASSOCIATION

Internal model risk output (Life) Log (for template IM.01)

Disclosure of European Embedded Value as of September 30, 2016

Overview of ERM Assessment Viewpoints (June 2016) Overview

Own Risk Solvency Assessment (ORSA) Linking Risk Management, Capital Management and Strategic Planning

NAIC VA Reserve and Capital Reform: Overview of Proposed Revisions. Aaron Sarfatti

GreyCastle Life Reinsurance (SAC) Ltd. Financial Condition Report

Session 5: Evolution of ORSA in the US. Moderator: Michael Anthony McComis Jr. MAAA,FCAS

AIIB Directive on Market Risk Management March 27, 2018

Transcription:

Bill Schwegler, Senior Actuary, AEGON DEVELOPING A GROUP CAPITAL CALCULATION Presentation to NAIC s Group Solvency Issues Working Group March 25, 2011

Economic capital models: critical decisions 1. Definition of solvency 2. Time horizon of risk exposure 3. Risks to model 4. How risks are quantified 5. Measurement metric 6. Target level of capital 7. Reflecting diversification

Decision #1 Definition of solvency Cash flow basis: an insurer is solvent if it can continue to pay claims as they come due Balance sheet basis: an insurer is solvent if its assets exceed its liabilities Most common Requires selection of accounting basis for assets and liabilities (most common are US GAAP or market-consistent)

Decision #2 Time horizon of risk exposure Any time horizon can be modeled, but two are most common One year Open system : assumes that gains are paid out as dividends and capital losses (up to a point) can be replaced by shareholders Future events considered through revaluation of assets and liabilities after one year Greater emphasis on near-term risks Closed system : assumes gains are not paid out as dividends, and capital losses are not replaced Greater emphasis on long-term risks More complex to implement Lifetime Simpler to implement 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Lifetime

Decision #3 Risks to model Objective: measure material risks Risk A Risk B Risk C Risk D Risk E Risk F Material Immaterial

Decision #4 How risks are quantified Stress Tests Risk is measured by the impact of a shock to the system Stochastic Modeling Risk is measured by multiple scenarios that produce a range of possible outcomes Factors Risk is measured by static factors that generally do not change from period to period Used in Solvency II Used in Life RBC C-3 measurements Used in many aspects of U.S. RBC

Decision #5 Measurement metric Value at Risk (percentile) Quantifies the capital needed to withstand a loss at a certain probability. Used in Solvency II Tail Value at Risk (CTE) Quantifies the capital needed to withstand average losses above a certain probability. Used in emerging system in Bermuda. Probability of Ruin Quantifies the probability of ruin given the capital held Complement of VAR

Decision #6 Target level of capital Target capital is a function of the insurer s business objectives AAA AA A BBB Target capital business objective Target capital business objective Target capital business objective Target capital business objective

Decision #7 Reflecting diversification Diversification benefits provide an incentive to spread around the risks to which the insurer is exposed Mortality Investment Operational Risk manage- ment Policyholder behavior Asset-liability mismatch

Two most common economic capital approaches One-Year Mark-to-Market 1. Definition of solvency Market-consistent balance sheet basis Lifetime Runoff Balance sheet basis, frequently US GAAP 2. Time horizon of risk exposure One year Lifetime 3. Risks to model All material risks All material risks 4. How risks are quantified Primarily stress tests Stochastic modeling 5. Measurement metric Typically VaR (percentile) Frequently TVaR (CTE) 6. Target level of capital Usually at least 99% confidence over one year 7. Diversification effects Determined after stress tests are performed Usually at least 90%+ CTE over the lifetime Embedded in stochastic scenarios

Economic capital and the ORSA Key Messages Insurers should have sound processes for assessing capital adequacy in relation to risk profile; this process should be integrated into its management and decision-making culture Regulators should be able to understand insurers risk profiles Economic capital models can be an excellent risk assessment resource, in context The ORSA process should not mandate specific approaches but should focus on verifying that insurers are thinking about and managing their risk exposures Care must be taken to ensure that the ORSA process does not have unintended consequences on insurer risk management practices

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Bill Schwegler Senior Actuary AEGON 319-355-2667 bschwegler@aegonusa.com Robert Neill Senior Counsel American Council of Life Insurers 202-624-2313 Robert neill@acli.com