Tactical Asset Allocation Change

april 14, 2011 research bulletin global investment committee Global Investment Committee Tactical Asset Allocation Change analysis authors Equities: Increase Exposure to US Stocks and Reduce Exposure to Canada and Asia Pacific ex Japan Stocks Bonds: Increase Exposure to Emerging Market Bonds and Reduce Exposure to Developed- Market Government Bonds jeff applegate Chief Investment Officer david m. darst, cfa Chief Investment Strategist kevin flanagan Chief Fixed Income Strategist jonathan mackay Senior Credit Strategist charles reinhard Deputy Chief Investment Officer douglas schindewolf Director of Tactical Asset Allocation

Summary of Strategic & Tactical Allocations for Global Investment Committee Asset Allocation Models The table below summarizes our best thinking on the construction of strategic portfolios and tactical asset allocation. These three portfolios are a sampling of our guidance for investors with more than $20 million of investable assets, which are a subset of the GIC asset allocation models that are shown starting on page 6. The strategic equity allocations in these portfolios are in proportion to their share of global market capitalization. Recent changes are marked by arrows. effective april 15, 2011 Model Source: Global Investment Committee as of April 15, 2011 Moderate Balanced Strategic Weight Tactical Relative Weight Equity & Alternative Investments Strategic Weight Tactical Relative Weight Bond & Alternative Investment Strategic Weight Tactical Relative Weight Global Cash 5% -2% 0% 0% 25% -2% 37-9 0 0 65 1 Global Equities 32 6 70-4 0 0 Global Alternative/Absolute Return Investments 26 5 30 4 10 1 Global Cash 5-2 0 0 25-2 Investment Grade 30-11 - - 65 1 Short Duration 5-2 - - 10-3 Government/Government-Related 16-10 - - 33-6 Corporate & Securitized 9 1 - - 22 10 High Yield 4 1 - - - - Emerging Markets 3 1 - - - - Total Bonds 37-9 - - 65 1 Total Cash & Short Duration Bonds 10-4 - - 35-5 Global Equities US Large 10 4 22 2 - - Growth 5 3 11 3 - - Value 5 1 11-1 - - US Mid 2 1 4 0 - - Growth 1 1 2 0 - - Value 1 0 2 0 - - Canada 1 0 3 0 - - Europe 7-3 16-8 - - Europe ex UK 5-3 11-7 - - UK 2 0 5-1 - - Developed Asia 4-3 9-6 - - Japan 3-3 6-6 - - Asia Pacific ex Japan 1 0 3 0 - - US Small 2 1 4 0 - - Growth 1 1 2 0 - - Value 1 0 2 0 - - World ex US Small Cap 2 1 4 0 - - Emerging Markets 4 5 8 8 - - Total Equities 32 6 70-4 - - US Equity 14 6 30 2 - - Developed World ex US 14-5 32-14 - - Developed Market Equity 28 1 62-12 - - Emerging Market Equity 4 5 8 8 - - Global Alternative/Absolute Return Investments REITs 3 1 2 1 - - Commodities 2 3 5 3 - - Inflation-Linked Securities 3 1 - - 10 1 Managed Futures Funds 4 0 5 0 - - Hedge Funds 11 0 10 0 - - Private Real Estate - - 3 0 - - Private Equity 3 0 5 0 - - Total Alternative/Absolute Return Investments 26 5 30 4 10 1 2 morgan stanley smith barney april 14, 2011

Global Equities: Within Developed Markets, Small Shift to US From Non US Since April 2009, within the context of an equity overweight vis-à-vis bonds and cash, we have been overweight (OW) emerging markets and underweight (UW) developed-market (DM) equities. Within DM equities, our biggest UW has been Japan, followed by Europe; our only OWs to DM equities have been Canada and Asia Pacific ex-japan, with Australia primarily constituting the latter. Since January 2011, we have been market weight (MW) US equities. Today we are dropping to a MW for Canada and Australia and redeploying those funds to an OW in US equities. WANING TAILWINDS. Our rationale for our OWs to Canada and Australia was twofold: commodity exposure and currency appreciation. Both countries have a disproportionate exposure to commodities energy in Canada and mining/raw materials in Australia which we generally have expected to continue to perform well alongside the ongoing global businesscycle expansion and with the leading role commodity-hungry emerging economies play in that growth. As for currency, we expected that both the Aussie and Canadian dollars would trade at least at parity with the US dollar. Given that we manage global equities on an unhedged basis for mainly US-dollar investors, we thought that currency appreciation would provide an additional boost to those local equity returns. In the one-year period ended March 31, 2011, the MSCI Canada Index Chart 1: Big Caps are more attractively valued than mid caps... 1.2 1.1 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 Ratio: Russell Mid-Cap FPE to Russell Top 200 FPE and the MSCI Australia Index returned 23.1% and 15.0%, respectively, in US-dollar terms. Both markets outperformed, in US-dollar terms, the global benchmark MSCI All Country World Index s 14.6%. Now that the Canadian and Australian currency appreciation we were looking for has largely occurred and in the case of Canada, begun to abate only one rationale for overweighting those stock As compared with the forward price/ earnings (FPE) ratio of the Russell Top 200 Index, the FPE ratio of the Russell 800 Index reveals the largest US stocks to be relatively inexpensive. Average 78 81 84 87 90 93 96 99 02 05 08 11 Source: Thomson Financial, FactSet Research System as of March 31, 2011 Table 1: Morgan Stanley and Citi Global GDP and Inflation Forecasts (year-over-year percent change) % Contribution Morgan Stanley to Growth 2010E 2011E 2012E 2011E Global GDP 5.0 4.2 4.6 Developed Economies 2.6 2.5 2.7 26 US 2.9 2.9 3.6 14 Euro Zone 1.7 1.7 1.2 6 UK 1.3 1.4 1.8 1 Japan 3.9-0.5 2.9-1 Developing Economies 7.8 6.5 6.7 74 Brazil 7.7 4.0 4.6 3 Russia 4.0 5.0 5.5 4 India 8.8 7.7 8.7 10 China 10.3 9.0 9.0 28 Global Consumer Prices Global Inflation 3.3 3.9 3.4 Developed Economies 1.4 2.4 1.8 Developing Economies 5.5 5.6 5.0 US Core 1.0 1.4 2.1 US CPI 1.6 2.7 2.3 % Contribution Citi to Growth 2010E 2011E 2012E 2011E Global GDP 4.0 3.6 3.9 Developed Economies 2.5 2.2 2.5 43 US 2.9 2.9 3.3 23 Euro Zone 1.6 1.7 1.3 11 UK 1.3 1.9 2.2 2 Japan 3.9 1.1 2.6 3 Developing Economies 7.2 6.2 6.2 57 Brazil 7.5 4.0 4.5 3 Russia 4.0 4.3 4.1 3 India 8.6 8.4 8.7 6 China 10.3 9.2 9.0 25 Global Consumer Prices Global Inflation 2.7 3.7 3.2 Developed Economies 1.4 2.4 1.8 Developing Economies 5.3 6.2 5.6 US Core 1.0 1.3 1.4 US CPI 1.6 2.6 1.8 Note: Morgan Stanley regional and global forecasts are GDP-weighted averages, using Purchasing Power Parity estimates. That gives greater weights to developing economies. Citi forecasts use current foreign exchange rates. Source: Morgan Stanley & Co. Inc., Citi Investment Research & Analysis, Morgan Stanley Smith Barney as of April 8, 2011 3 morgan stanley smith barney april 14, 2011

markets remains: commodities. Since we already have an OW to commodities as an alternative asset class, playing the commodity trade indirectly through those equity markets is not compelling. Accordingly, we are moving to MW from OW for Canadian and Australian equities. The policy response to the financial crisis was more robust in the US as compared with Europe or Japan. Thus the business-cycle expansion in the US will likely continue to be stronger than in Europe or Japan (Table 1). Moreover, US monetary policy discussed in greater detail below remains more stimulative than European or Japanese monetary policy. Finally, given that 55% of US, European and Japanese stock market profits are sourced locally, we decided to move to OW US equities from MW. TARGETING US MEGA CAPS. Within US equities, we have opted to add to our large-cap exposure. As compared with the forward price/earnings (FPE) ratio of the Russell Top 200 Index (the index we use to represent mega-cap stocks in the US), the FPE ratios of the Russell 800 and Russell 2000 indexes (the indexes we use to represent mid-caps and small-cap US stocks) reveal the largest US stocks to be relatively inexpensive. Indeed, the levels of these FPE-ratio comparisons are extreme by historical standards (Charts 1 and 2). As a result of this change, our tactical allocations now indicate a preference for large caps at the capitalization level. We retain our preference for growth over value at the style level, as relative valuation continues to suggest that value stocks are expensive relative to growth stocks, especially in the large-cap sector. For example, at 0.87, the ratio of the FPE on the Russell 1000 Value Index is nearly two standard deviations above its longterm average of 0.70 (Chart 3). Fixed Income: Small Shift to Emerging Market Debt From Developed-Market Sovereigns THE EASY MONEY EXIT. The altered landscape within the developed world s economies, their fiscal positions and attendant monetary policy outlooks present a challenging environment for Chart 2: And big caps are more attractively valued than small caps 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 Russell 2000 PE to Russell Top 200 PE developed-market (DM) sovereign debt in the months ahead. Concern about renewed economic slowing and potential double dips have given way to a more sustained expansion accompanied by rising inflation expectations. Against this backdrop, the DM money and bond markets are confronting the beginning stages of the long-awaited exit process. Inflation rates are running above target in both the Euro Zone and the UK, leading to the possibility of a series of rate hikes from their respective central banks. In the US, the scheduled June 30 Comparing the forward price/earnings (FPE) ratio of the Russell Top 200 Index with that of the Russell 2000 Index shows that this FPE-ratio comparison, too, is extreme by historical standards. Average 78 81 84 87 90 93 96 99 02 05 08 11 Source: Thomson Financial, FactSet Research System as of March 31, 2011 Chart 3: Growth is more attractively valued than value 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 Relative valuation continues to suggest that value stocks are expensive relative to growth stocks, especially in the large-cap stocks. For example, at 0.87, the ratio of the FPE on the Russell 1000 Value Index is nearly two standard deviations above its long-term average of 0.70. Russell 1000 Value FPE to Russell 1000 Growth FPE Average 78 81 84 87 90 93 96 99 02 05 08 11 Source: Citigroup Global Markets, Inc., FactSet Research System as of April 7, 2011 end of the second round of Quantitative Ease (QE2) is drawing nearer, which will most likely usher in the early stages of discounting the Fed s own exit strategy. Our base-case assumption is that there will not be a cliff effect in the Treasury market once QE2 concludes, but we do anticipate a gradual backup in rates along the yield curve. We expect the yield on the US 10-year Treasury note to climb into the 3.75%-to-4% range over the next 12 months. This could begin as the Fed steps away from active Treasury buying and market participants continue to 4 morgan stanley smith barney april 14, 2011

discount the economic expansion. We expect market rates to rise well before a hike in the fed funds target rate, which is unlikely before 2012. CONDITIONS RIPE FOR EM BONDS. The outlook for emerging market (EM) debt markets differs from that of the industrialized markets. With economic growth continuing at more than twice the rate of the major developed countries, monetary policy will probably tighten further, currencies are likely to appreciate and improving sovereign-credit risk profiles should mean somewhat flatter yield curves. One caveat is that returns on EM debt are not likely to continue at the robust pace of the past few years now that yield spreads versus industrialized-country debt have narrowed. However, further modest tightening in EM spreads coupled with a higher average coupon versus DM sovereigns should lead to positive returns and outperformance in the months ahead. The current spread about 260 basis points is well above the record low of 127 basis points seen in early 2007 and comfortably above the tightest recent reading of about 240 basis points from December 2010 (Chart 4). We believe the rerating of EM sovereigns over the past several years is likely to continue and is consistent with the secular tighter-spread trend. After all, each of the four BRIC countries (Brazil, Russia, India and China) now carries an investment-grade rating. The relatively low current yields within the DM universe lead us to believe there is a heightened degree of vulnerability for sovereign debt among the G10 group of nations. This sets up EM debt for outperformance. Consequently, we are making a small adjustment to our tactical allocations that results in a larger underweight within the DM government/government-related sector and an overweight for EM debt. Chart 4: Conditions are ripe for EM bonds With economic growth continuing at more than twice the rate of the major developed countries, we believe the rerating of EM sovereigns over the past several years is likely to continue and is consistent with the secular tighter-spread trend. 1,000 Basis Points 900 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 Citigroup Global Emerging Market Sovereign Bond Index Average Trend 100 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 Source: Citigroup Global Markets, Inc., FactSet Research System as of March 31, 2011 5 morgan stanley smith barney april 14, 2011

Global Investment Committee Asset Allocation Models The Global Investment Committee (GIC) is made up of senior professionals from Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated Research, Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, Citi Investment Research & Analysis and outside financial market experts. The committee provides guidance on investment allocation decisions through the creation and maintenance of various model portfolios. The GIC s Asset Allocation Models shown on the following pages represent its best thinking on strategic and tactical asset allocation. In these portfolios, the strategic equity allocations are in proportion to their share of global market capitalization based on the MSCI All Country World Investable Market Index. As such, the strategic allocation to non-us stocks is more than 50% of the total equity allocation. There are three sets of models designed to provide guidance for investors with less than $1 million (Level 1), between $1 million and $20 million (Level 2) and more than $20 million in investable assets (Level 3). Accordingly, the portfolio sets have varying levels of allocations to traditional asset classes, liquid alternative investments and illiquid investments. The GIC constructs each set of portfolios on a scale of increasing risk that is, expected volatility and expected return. Each set consists of eight risk-tolerance levels. In each case, model 1 is the least risky and is composed mostly of bonds. As the model numbers increase, the models introduce higher allocations to equities and, thus, become riskier. Alternative/absolute return investments are present in all models and provide increased asset-class diversification. The GIC has also created and maintains strategic and tactical allocations for several other model portfolios used in various advisory programs. Most of these model portfolios incorporate a home-country bias toward the US. Under this subjective constraint, the strategic equity allocations have a 70%/30% split between US and non-us markets, and the strategic fixed income allocations have an 80%/20% split. 6 morgan stanley smith barney april 14, 2011

Global Investment Committee Asset Allocation Models for Investors With Less Than $1 Million in Investable Assets (Level 1) Tactical Changes Effective April 15, 2011 and Inflationlinked Securities, Global Equities and Alternative/Absolute Return Investments Global Equities and Alternative/Absolute Return Investments Model Portfolios Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4 Model 5 Model 6 Model 7 Model 8 Strategic Tactical Strategic Tactical Strategic Tactical Strategic Tactical Strategic Tactical Strategic Tactical Strategic Tactical Strategic Tactical Global Cash 30% 28% 15% 13% 10% 8% 8% 6% 5% 3% 3% 1% - - - - Investment Grade 60 61 55 45 42 31 30 19 21 10 6 2 - - - - Short Duration 15 12 15 13 10 8 7 5 5 3 2 0 - - - - Government/ Government-Related 29 23 25 16 21 11 15 5 10 0 2 0 - - - - Corporate & Securitized 16 26 15 16 11 12 8 9 6 7 2 2 - - - - High Yield - - 2 3 3 4 5 6 6 7 8 7 - - - - Emerging Markets - - - - 2 3 4 5 5 6 6 3-0 - - Total Bonds 60 61 57 48 47 38 39 30 32 23 20 12 - - - - Total Cash & Short Duration Bonds 45 40 30 26 20 16 15 11 10 6 5 1 - - - - Global Equities US Large - - 6 10 12 16 16 20 18 23 22 28 30 33 24 27 Growth - - 3 6 6 10 8 12 9 14 11 17 15 20 12 16 Value - - 3 4 6 6 8 8 9 9 11 11 15 13 12 11 US Mid - - 2 3 2 3 2 3 4 5 4 5 4 4 4 4 Growth - - 1 2 1 2 1 2 2 3 2 3 2 2 2 2 Value - - 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Canada - - 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 Europe - - 4 2 9 5 10 6 12 7 15 9 21 13 18 9 Europe ex UK - - 3 1 6 2 7 3 8 3 10 5 14 7 12 5 UK - - 1 1 3 3 3 3 4 4 5 4 7 6 6 4 Developed Asia - - 3 1 4 1 6 2 7 2 9 3 12 4 11 4 Japan - - 2 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 6 0 8 0 7 0 Asia Pacific ex Japan - - 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 3 3 4 4 4 4 US Small - - 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 4 5 4 4 6 6 Growth - - 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 2 3 2 2 3 4 Value - - 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 3 2 World ex US Small - - 1 2 2 3 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 5 8 8 Emerging Markets - - 2 5 4 10 5 12 6 14 8 17 11 20 16 25 Total Equity - - 21 27 36 42 45 51 54 60 68 74 90 86 90 86 Total US Equity - - 10 16 16 22 20 26 24 31 30 38 38 41 34 37 Total Developed ex US Equity - - 9 6 16 10 20 13 24 15 30 19 41 25 40 24 Total Developed Market Equity - - 19 22 32 32 40 39 48 46 60 57 79 66 74 61 Total Emerging Market Equity - - 2 5 4 10 5 12 6 14 8 17 11 20 16 25 Global Alternative/Absolute Return Investments REITs - - 2 3 2 3 3 4 4 5 4 5 5 6 5 6 Commodities - - 2 5 2 5 2 5 2 5 3 6 5 8 5 8 Inflation-Linked Securities 10 11 3 4 3 4 3 4 3 4 2 2 - - - - Managed Futures - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Hedge Funds - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Private Real Estate - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Private Equity - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Total Alternative/ Absolute Return Investments 10 11 7 12 7 12 8 13 9 14 9 13 10 14 10 14 7 morgan stanley smith barney april 14, 2011

Global Investment Committee Asset Allocation Models for Investors With $1 Million to $20 Million in Investable Assets (Level 2) Tactical Changes Effective April 15, 2011 and Inflationlinked Securities, Global Equities and Alternative/Absolute Return Investments Global Equities and Alternative/Absolute Return Investments Model Portfolios Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4 Model 5 Model 6 Model 7 Model 8 Strategic Tactical Strategic Tactical Strategic Tactical Strategic Tactical Strategic Tactical Strategic Tactical Strategic Tactical Strategic Tactical Global Cash 25% 23% 13% 11% 8% 6% 5% 3% 3% 1% 2% - - - - - Investment Grade 65 66 55 45 40 29 30 19 20 9 6 1 - - - - Short Duration 15 12 12 10 7 5 5 3 2 0 3 0 - - - - Government/ Government-Related 32 26 28 19 21 11 16 6 12 2 2 0 - - - - Corporate & Securitized 18 28 15 16 12 13 9 10 6 7 1 1 - - - - High Yield - - 2 3 3 4 4 6 5 6 6 3 - - - - Emerging Markets - - - - 2 3 3 4 4 5 4 2 - - - - Total Bonds 65 66 57 48 45 36 37 28 29 20 16 8 - - - - Total Cash & Short Duration Bonds 40 35 25 21 15 11 10 6 5 1 5 - - - - - Global Equities US Large - - 6 11 8 11 12 17 14 18 18 24 24 26 20 22 Growth - - 3 7 4 7 6 10 7 11 9 14 12 16 10 13 Value - - 3 4 4 4 6 7 7 7 9 10 12 10 10 9 US Mid - - - - 2 3 2 3 4 5 4 5 4 4 4 4 Growth - - - - 1 2 1 2 2 3 2 3 2 2 2 2 Value - - - - 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Canada - - 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 3 3 2 2 Europe - - 4 2 6 4 8 4 10 6 13 8 17 10 15 6 Europe ex UK - - 3 1 4 2 5 2 7 3 9 4 11 6 10 3 UK - - 1 1 2 2 3 2 3 3 4 4 6 4 5 3 Developed Asia - - 2 1 4 1 4 1 6 2 7 2 10 3 7 2 Japan - - 1 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 7 0 5 0 Asia Pacific ex Japan - - 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 3 3 2 2 US Small - - - - 2 3 2 3 2 3 4 5 4 4 6 6 Growth - - - - 1 2 1 2 1 2 2 3 2 2 3 4 Value - - - - 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 3 2 World ex US Small - - 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 4 4 7 7 Emerging Markets - - 2 5 3 9 4 10 5 12 7 15 9 17 14 22 Total Equity - - 16 22 28 34 35 41 44 50 58 64 75 71 75 71 Total US Equity - - 6 11 12 17 16 23 20 26 26 34 32 34 30 32 Total Developed ex US Equity - - 8 6 13 8 15 8 19 12 25 15 34 20 31 17 Total Developed Market Equity - - 14 17 25 25 31 31 39 38 51 49 66 54 61 49 Total Emerging Market Equity - - 2 5 3 9 4 10 5 12 7 15 9 17 14 22 Global Alternative/Absolute Return Investments REITs - - 2 3 2 3 3 4 4 5 4 5 5 6 5 6 Commodities - - 2 5 2 5 2 5 2 5 3 6 5 8 5 8 Inflation-Linked Securities 10 11 3 4 3 4 3 4 3 4 2 2 - - - - Managed Futures - - 2 2 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 Hedge Funds - - 5 5 8 8 11 11 11 11 10 10 10 10 10 10 Private Real Estate - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Private Equity - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Total Alternative/ Absolute Return Investments 10 11 14 19 19 24 23 28 24 29 24 28 25 29 25 29 8 morgan stanley smith barney april 14, 2011

Global Investment Committee Asset Allocation Models for Investors With $20 Million or More in Investable Assets (Level 3) Tactical Changes Effective April 15, 2011 and Inflationlinked Securities, Global Equities and Alternative/Absolute Return Investments Global Equities and Alternative/Absolute Return Investments Model Portfolios Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4 Model 5 Model 6 Model 7 Model 8 Strategic Tactical Strategic Tactical Strategic Tactical Strategic Tactical Strategic Tactical Strategic Tactical Strategic Tactical Strategic Tactical Global Cash 25% 23% 13% 11% 8% 6% 5% 3% 3% 1% 2% - - - - - Investment Grade 65 66 55 45 40 29 30 19 20 9 6 1 - - - - Short Duration 10 7 7 5 7 5 5 3 2 0 3 0 - - - - Government/ Government-Related 33 27 30 21 21 11 16 6 12 2 2 0 - - - - Corporate & Securitized 22 32 18 19 12 13 9 10 6 7 1 1 - - - - High Yield - - 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 5 - - - - Emerging Markets - - - - 2 3 3 4 4 5 4 2 - - - - Total Bonds 65 66 57 48 45 36 37 28 29 20 16 8 - - - - Total Cash & Short Duration Bonds 35 30 20 16 15 11 10 6 5 1 5 0 - - - - Global Equities US Large - - 6 11 8 12 10 14 14 18 18 24 22 24 18 20 Growth - - 3 7 4 7 5 8 7 11 9 14 11 14 9 12 Value - - 3 4 4 5 5 6 7 7 9 10 11 10 9 8 US Mid - - - - 2 2 2 3 2 3 4 5 4 4 4 4 Growth - - - - 1 1 1 2 1 2 2 3 2 2 2 2 Value - - - - 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 Canada - - 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 3 3 2 2 Europe - - 4 3 6 4 7 4 9 5 12 7 16 8 13 4 Europe ex UK - - 3 2 4 2 5 2 6 2 8 3 11 4 9 2 UK - - 1 1 2 2 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 4 4 2 Developed Asia - - 2 1 3 1 4 1 5 2 7 2 9 3 7 2 Japan - - 1 0 2 0 3 0 3 0 5 0 6 0 5 0 Asia Pacific ex Japan - - 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 3 3 2 2 US Small - - - - 2 2 2 3 2 3 2 3 4 4 6 6 Growth - - - - 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 2 2 2 3 4 Value - - - - 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 3 2 World ex US Small - - 1 2 1 2 2 3 2 3 3 3 4 4 7 7 Emerging Markets - - 2 4 3 8 4 9 5 11 6 14 8 16 13 21 Total Equity - - 16 22 26 32 32 38 40 46 54 60 70 66 70 66 Total US Equity - - 6 11 12 16 14 20 18 24 24 32 30 32 28 30 Total Developed ex US Equity - - 8 7 11 8 14 9 17 11 24 14 32 16 29 21 Total Developed Market Equity - - 14 18 23 24 28 29 35 35 48 46 62 50 57 45 Total Emerging Market Equity - - 2 4 3 8 4 9 5 11 6 14 8 16 13 21 Global Alternative/Absolute Return Investments REITs - - 2 3 2 3 3 4 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 Commodities - - 2 5 2 5 2 5 2 5 3 6 5 8 5 8 Inflation-Linked Securities 10 11 3 4 3 4 3 4 3 4 2 2 - - - - Managed Futures - - 2 2 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 Hedge Funds - - 5 5 8 8 11 11 11 11 10 10 10 10 10 10 Private Real Estate - - - - - - - - 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 Private Equity - - - - 2 2 3 3 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 Total Alternative/ Absolute Return Investments 10 11 14 19 21 26 26 31 28 33 28 32 30 34 30 34 9 morgan stanley smith barney april 14, 2011

Index Definitions standard & poor s 500 index Widely regarded as the best single gauge of the US equities market, this capitalizationweighted index includes a representative sample of 500 leading companies in leading industries of the US economy. msci all country world index This freefloat-adjusted marketcapitalization index is designed to measure equity market performance in the developed and emerging markets. russell 1000 growth index This index measures the performance of the Russell 1000 companies with higher priceto-book ratios and higher forecasted growth rates. russell 1000 value index This index measures the performance of the Russell 1000 companies with lower priceto-book ratios and lower forecasted growth rates. msci emerging markets index This is a free-float-adjusted market-capitalization index designed to measure equity market performance in the global emerging markets. msci world index This free-float-adjusted market-capitalization index measures performance of 24 developed equity markets. citi broad investment grade (big) bond index This index comprises US-dollar investmentgrade securities with minimum ratings of Baa3/ BBB-, minimum denominations of $250 million, minimum maturities of one year, minimum par amount of $1,000 and a fixed coupon. citi high yield market index This index captures the performance of below-investment-grade debt issued by corporations domiciled in the US or Canada, including cash-pay and deferredinterest securities. All the bonds are publicly placed, have a fixed coupon and are nonconvertible. Bonds issued under Rule 144A are included in their unregistered form. dow jones-ubs commodity index This index comprises futures contracts on 19 physical commodities. These include energy, industrial metals, precious metals and agricultural commodities. hfri fund-of-funds composite index This is an equal-weighted index of 650 hedge funds with at least $50 million in assets and 12-months of returns. Returns are reported in US dollars and are net of fees. hfri equity hedge index Equity hedge funds maintain long and short positions in equity and equity derivative securities. A wide variety of investment processes can be employed to arrive at an investment decision, including both quantitative and fundamental techniques. Strategies can be broadly diversified or narrowly focused on specific sectors and can range broadly in terms of levels of net exposure, leverage, holding periods, concentrations of market capitalizations and valuation ranges. hfri equity market neutral index These strategies employ sophisticated quantitative techniques of analyzing price data to ascertain information about future price movement and relationships between securities, select securities for purchase and sale. These can include both factorbased and statistical arbitrage/trading strategies. Factor-based investment strategies include strategies in which the investment thesis is predicated on the systematic analysis of common relationships between securities. In many but not all cases, portfolios are constructed to be neutral to one or multiple variables, such as broader equity markets in dollar or beta terms, and leverage is frequently employed to enhance the return profile of the positions identified. Statistical arbitrage/trading consist of strategies in which the investment thesis is predicated on exploiting pricing anomalies, which may occur as a function of expected mean reversion inherent in security prices; high-frequency techniques may be employed and trading strategies may also be employed on the basis of technical analysis or opportunistically to exploit new information the investment manager believes has not been fully, completely or accurately discounted into current security prices. Equity market neutral strategies typically maintain characteristic net equity market exposure no greater than 10% long or short. hfri event driven index Investment managers who maintain positions in companies currently or prospectively involved in corporate transactions of a wide variety including but not limited to mergers, restructurings, financial distress, tender offers, shareholder buybacks, debt exchanges security issuance or other capital structure adjustments. Security types can range from most senior in the capital structure to most junior or subordinated, and frequently involve additional derivative securities. Event-driven exposure includes a combination of sensitivities to equity markets, credit markets and idiosyncratic, company-specific developments. Investment theses are typically predicated on fundamental characteristics, with the realization of the thesis predicated on a specific development exogenous to the existing capital structure. hfri macro index These funds trade a broad range of strategies in which the investment process is predicated on movements in underlying economic variables and the impact these have on equity, fixed income, hard currency and commodity markets. Managers employ a variety of techniques, both discretionary and systematic analysis, combinations of topdown and bottom-up theses, quantitative and fundamental approaches and long- and short-term holding periods. hfri multi strategy index This index measures the performance of mulitstrategy managers. They typically maintain positions in companies currently or prospectively involved in corporate transactions including mergers, restructurings, financial distress, tender offers, shareholder buybacks, debt exchanges, security issuance or other capital structure adjustments. 10 morgan stanley smith barney april 14, 2011

Disclosures This material has been prepared for informational purposes only and is not an offer to buy or sell or a solicitation of any offer to buy or sell any security or other financial instrument or to participate in any trading strategy. This is not a research report and was not prepared by the Research Departments of Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated or Citigroup Global Markets Inc. The views and opinions contained in this material are those of the author(s) and may differ materially from the views and opinions of others at Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC or any of its affiliate companies. Past performance is not necessarily a guide to future performance. The author(s) (if any authors are noted) principally responsible for the preparation of this material receive compensation based upon various factors, including quality and accuracy of their work, firm revenues (including trading and capital markets revenues), client feedback and competitive factors. Morgan Stanley Smith Barney is involved in many businesses that may relate to companies, securities or instruments mentioned in this material. This material has been prepared for informational purposes only and is not an offer to buy or sell or a solicitation of any offer to buy or sell any security/instrument, or to participate in any trading strategy. Any such offer would be made only after a prospective investor had completed its own independent investigation of the securities, instruments or transactions, and received all information it required to make its own investment decision, including, where applicable, a review of any offering circular or memorandum describing such security or instrument. That information would contain material information not contained herein and to which prospective participants are referred. This material is based on public information as of the specified date, and may be stale thereafter. We have no obligation to tell you when information herein may change. We make no representation or warranty with respect to the accuracy or completeness of this material. Morgan Stanley Smith Barney has no obligation to provide updated information on the securities/instruments mentioned herein. The securities/instruments discussed in this material may not be suitable for all investors. The appropriateness of a particular investment or strategy will depend on an investor s individual circumstances and objectives. Morgan Stanley Smith Barney recommends that investors independently evaluate specific investments and strategies, and encourages investors to seek the advice of a financial advisor. The value of and income from investments may vary because of changes in interest rates, foreign exchange rates, default rates, prepayment rates, securities/instruments prices, market indexes, operational or financial conditions of companies and other issuers or other factors. Estimates of future performance are based on assumptions that may not be realized. Actual events may differ from those assumed and changes to any assumptions may have a material impact on any projections or estimates. Other events not taken into account may occur and may significantly affect the projections or estimates. Certain assumptions may have been made for modeling purposes only to simplify the presentation and/or calculation of any projections or estimates, and Morgan Stanley Smith Barney does not represent that any such assumptions will reflect actual future events. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that estimated returns or projections will be realized or that actual returns or performance results will not materially differ from those estimated herein. This material should not be viewed as advice or recommendations with respect to asset allocation or any particular investment. This information is not intended to, and should not, form a primary basis for any investment decisions that you may make. Morgan Stanley Smith Barney is not acting as a fiduciary under either the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended or under section 4975 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 as amended in providing this material. Morgan Stanley Smith Barney and its affiliates do not render advice on tax and tax accounting matters to clients. This material was not intended or written to be used, and it cannot be used or relied upon by any recipient, for any purpose, including the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer under US federal tax laws. Each client should consult his/her personal tax and/or legal advisor to learn about any potential tax or other implications that may result from acting on a particular recommendation. International investing entails greater risk, as well as greater potential rewards compared to US investing. These risks include political and economic uncertainties of foreign countries as well as the risk of currency fluctuations. These risks are magnified in countries with emerging markets, since these countries may have relatively unstable governments and less established markets and economies. Alternative investments which may be referenced in this report, including private equity funds, real estate funds, hedge funds, managed futures funds, funds of hedge funds, private equity, and managed futures funds, are speculative and entail significant risks that can include losses due to leveraging or other speculative investment practices, lack of liquidity, volatility of returns, restrictions on transferring interests in a fund, potential lack of diversification, absence and/or delay of information regarding valuations and pricing, complex tax structures and delays in tax reporting, less regulation and higher fees than mutual funds and risks associated with the operations, personnel and processes of the advisor. Investing in commodities entails significant risks. Commodity prices may be affected by a variety of factors at any time, including but not limited to, (i) changes in supply and demand relationships, (ii) governmental programs and policies, (iii) national and international political and economic events, war and terrorist events, (iv) changes in interest and exchange rates, (v) trading activities in commodities and related contracts, (vi) pestilence, technological change and weather, and (vii) the price volatility of a commodity. In addition, the commodities markets are subject to temporary distortions or other disruptions due to various factors, including lack of liquidity, participation of speculators and government intervention. 11 morgan stanley smith barney april 14, 2011

Bonds are subject to interest rate risk. When interest rates rise, bond prices fall; generally the longer a bond s maturity, the more sensitive it is to this risk. Bonds may also be subject to call risk, which is the risk that the issuer will redeem the debt at its option, fully or partially, before the scheduled maturity date. The market value of debt instruments may fluctuate, and proceeds from sales prior to maturity may be more or less than the amount originally invested or the maturity value due to changes in market conditions or changes in the credit quality of the issuer. Bonds are subject to the credit risk of the issuer. This is the risk that the issuer might be unable to make interest and/or principal payments on a timely basis. Bonds are also subject to reinvestment risk, which is the risk that principal and/or interest payments from a given investment may be reinvested at a lower interest rate. Bonds rated below investment grade may have speculative characteristics and present significant risks beyond those of other securities, including greater credit risk and price volatility in the secondary market. Investors should be careful to consider these risks alongside their individual circumstances, objectives and risk tolerance before investing in high-yield bonds. High yield bonds should comprise only a limited portion of a balanced portfolio. Treasury Inflation Protection Securities (TIPS) coupon payments and underlying principal are automatically increased to compensate for inflation by tracking the consumer price index (CPI). While the real rate of return is guaranteed, TIPS tend to offer a low return. Because the return of TIPS is linked to inflation, TIPS may significantly underperform versus conventional US Treasuries in times of low inflation. Equity securities may fluctuate in response to news on companies, industries, market conditions and general economic environment. Investing in smaller companies involves greater risks not associated with investing in more established companies, such as business risk, significant stock price fluctuations and illiquidity. Asset allocation and diversification do not assure a profit or protect against loss in declining financial markets. The indices are unmanaged. An investor cannot invest directly in an index. They are shown for illustrative purposes only and do not represent the performance of any specific investment. REITs investing risks are similar to those associated with direct investments in real estate: property value fluctuations, lack of liquidity, limited diversification and sensitivity to economic factors such as interest rate changes and market recessions. Because of their narrow focus, sector investments tend to be more volatile than investments that diversify across many sectors and companies. Certain securities referred to in this material may not have been registered under the US Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and, if not, may not be offered or sold absent an exemption therefrom. Recipients are required to comply with any legal or contractual restrictions on their purchase, holding, sale, exercise of rights or performance of obligations under any securities/instruments transaction. Investing in foreign emerging markets entails greater risks than those normally associated with domestic markets, such as political, currency, economic and market risks. Value investing does not guarantee a profit or eliminate risk. Not all companies whose stocks are considered to be value stocks are able to turn their business around or successfully employ corrective strategies which would result in stock prices that do not rise as initially expected. Growth investing does not guarantee a profit or eliminate risk. The stocks of these companies can have relatively high valuations. Because of these high valuations, an investment in a growth stock can be more risky than an investment in a company with more modest growth expectations. This material is disseminated in Australia to retail clients within the meaning of the Australian Corporations Act by Morgan Stanley Smith Barney Australia Pty Ltd (A.B.N. 19 009 145 555, holder of Australian financial services license No. 240813). Morgan Stanley Smith Barney is not incorporated under the People s Republic of China ( PRC ) law and the research in relation to this report is conducted outside the PRC. This report will be distributed only upon request of a specific recipient. This report does not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy any securities in the PRC. PRC investors must have the relevant qualifications to invest in such securities and must be responsible for obtaining all relevant approvals, licenses, verifications and or registrations from PRC s relevant governmental authorities. Morgan Stanley Private Wealth Management Ltd, which is authorized and regulated by the Financial Services Authority, approves for the purpose of section 21 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000, content for distribution in the United Kingdom. Morgan Stanley Smith Barney is not acting as a municipal advisor and the opinions or views contained herein are not intended to be, and do not constitute, advice within the meaning of Section 975 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. This material is disseminated in the United States of America by Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC. Third-party data providers make no warranties or representations of any kind relating to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the data they provide and shall not have liability for any damages of any kind relating to such data. Recently, the Global Wealth Management Group of Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated and the Smith Barney division of Citigroup Global Markets Inc. combined into Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC, a new investment advisor and broker/dealer registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The URL on an e-mail address is not indicative of the author s employer. Morgan Stanley Smith Barney material, or any portion thereof, may not be reprinted, sold or redistributed without the written consent of Morgan Stanley Smith Barney. 2011 Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC. Member SIPC. 6681989 (MSSB) 04/11 12 morgan stanley smith barney april 14, 2011