( ) Page: 1/79 FACTUAL PRESENTATION

Similar documents
WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION

( ) Page: 1/60 FACTUAL PRESENTATION FREE TRADE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHEAST ASIAN NATIONS (ASEAN) AND INDIA (GOODS)

CHAPTER TWO NATIONAL TREATMENT AND MARKET ACCESS FOR GOODS

WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION

Article XI* General Elimination of Quantitative Restrictions

CONTENTS. 1 International trade and the law of the WTO 1. 2 The World Trade Organization 74

PROTOCOL ON THE ACCESSION OF THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF ClDNA. Preamble

EU-Mexico Free Trade Agreement EU TEXTUAL PROPOSAL. Chapter on Trade in Goods. Article X.1. Scope. Article X.2

CHAPTER 2 NATIONAL TREATMENT AND MARKET ACCESS FOR GOODS ARTICLE 2.1. Objective

Uruguay Round. The GATT. A Negotiating History ( ) KLUWER LAW INTERNATIONAL TERENCE P. STEWART, EDITOR VOLUME IV: THE END GAME (PART I)

World Trade Law. Text, Materials and Commentary. Simon Lester and Bryan Mercurio with Arwel Davies and Kara Leitner

THE GENERAL AGREEMENT

EU Trade Policy and CETA

NATIONAL TREATMENT AND MARKET ACCESS FOR GOODS. Section A: Scope and coverage. Article. Scope. Article. Objective

Regional Trade Agreements

Introduction to the GATS

How to Methodically Research WTO Law

GATT Obligations: -Shailja Singh Assistant Professor Centre for WTO Studies, New Delhi

GATT Obligations: Article I (MFN), II (Bound Rates), III (National Treatment), XI (QRs), XX (Exceptions) and XXIV (FTAs) -Shailja Singh

Character of the GATS

Economy Report: Korea

The General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS): objectives, coverage and disciplines

Exports to major trading partners and duties faced

MID-TERM EVALUATION OF THE EU S GSP: PRESENTATION OF THE MAIN FINDINGS

FINAL ACT. 2. the texts listed below which are annexed to the Agreement amending the Convention establishing the European Free Trade Association:

Exports to major trading partners and duties faced

BASIC CUSTOMS INSTRUMENTS Customs Tariff. Bilateral Screening Chapter 29 Customs Union Presentation by Republic of Serbia Brussels, 3-4 June 2014

Exports to major trading partners and duties faced

Exports to major trading partners and duties faced

Exports to major trading partners and duties faced

FREE TRADE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE EFTA STATES AND MEXICO

DECISION No 2/2000 OF THE EC-MEXICO JOINT COUNCIL of 23 March 2000 (2000/415/EC)

Exports to major trading partners and duties faced

National Interest Analysis

Expanding Trade and Investment in South Eastern Europe Friedrich Ebert Stiftung Brussels April 2007

NATIONAL TREATMENT PRINCIPLE

Accession to the WTO Process and Practice

World Trade Organization: Its Genesis and Functioning. Shashank Priya Professor Centre for WTO Studies Indian Institute of Foreign Trade

SUMMARY OF CONTENTS. Introduction page 1

SINGAPORE AND COSTA RICA SIGN FREE TRADE AGREEMENT

SERVICES TRADE UNDER THE GATS

EUROPEAN UNION SOUTH KOREA TRADE AND INVESTMENT 5 TH ANNIVERSARY OF THE FTA. Delegation of the European Union to the Republic of Korea

KEY INDICATORS AND TRENDS

SUMMARY (1) ECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT

Regional Trade Agreements and the WTO: WTO Consistency of East Asian RTAs

WORKING PARTY ON CHINA'S STATUS AS A CONTRACTING PARTY. Examination of the Foreign Trade Regime - Part II. Note by the Secretariat

BULGARIAN TRADE WITH THIRD COUNTRIES FOR THE PERIOD JANUARY - NOVEMBER 2010 (PRELIMINARY DATA)

Recent developments in international trade and in the use of trade policy instruments

FREE TRADE AGREEMENTS

CARIBBEAN REGIONAL NEGOTIATING MACHINERY THE TREATMENT OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES IN THE EPA

Ulla KASK Agriculture and Commodities Division WTO

Tariffs and imports: Summary and duty ranges Summary

NATIONAL TREATMENT PRINCIPLE

Assessing the impacts of NTMs in trade

Basic Elements. GATS: Scope and coverage. What are services? GATS AND THE CURRENT SERVICES ROUND. GATS - Basic Features Washington, April 2004

7621/16 ADD 1 NT/kp DGC 1A. Council of the European Union. Brussels, 12 October 2016 (OR. en) 7621/16 ADD 1. Interinstitutional File: 2016/0091 (NLE)

Agriculture Subsidies and Trade. US$ Billion

WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION

Economic Impact of Canada s Participation in the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership

CONTENTS. ABBREVIATIONS AND SYMBOLS...vii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS...ix DISCLAIMER...x FOREWORD BY THE DIRECTOR-GENERAL...xi EXECUTIVE SUMMARY...

( ) Page: 1/6 EUROPEAN UNION MEASURES AFFECTING TARIFF CONCESSIONS ON CERTAIN POULTRY MEAT PRODUCTS REQUEST FOR CONSULTATIONS BY CHINA

General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS): Issues and Implications

CHINA AND SWITZERLAND: THE FTA AND MEDICAL DEVICES

KEY STATISTICS AND TRENDS

BRIEFING ON The TRANS-PACIFIC PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT (TPPA)

AGREEMENT ON AGRICULTURE

No. 10 Caribbean Community (CARICOM) Dominican Republic Free Trade

Final Draft Framework Agreement

ANNEX. to the. Recommendation for a Council Decision. authorising the opening of negotiations for a Free Trade Agreement with New Zealand

Commentaries on Selected Model Investment Treaties. Edited by CHESTER BROWN

( ) Page: 1/10 TARIFF IMPLEMENTATION ISSUES COMMUNICATION FROM THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Hong Kong, China. Dashboard - Cover Note

DG Trade Statistical Guide Trade

Draft Cancun Ministerial Text

( ) Page: 1/31 ACCESSION TO THE WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION PROCEDURES FOR NEGOTIATIONS UNDER ARTICLE XII. Note by the Secretariat 1.

Comparing Dispute Settlement Systems: NAFTA and WTO. CREP Workshop 13 September 2005 Junji Nakagawa (ISS)

2005/FTA-RTA/WKSP/010a Peru s FTAs/RTAs

RE: Request for comments concerning free trade agreement with Colombia (Docket No. USTR )

In Brief NAFTA SPECIFIC RULES OF ORIGIN

CONVENTION ESTABLISHING THE EUROPEAN FREE TRADE ASSOCIATION. Consolidated version, last amended on 20 September 2010

SECTION B INVESTMENT LIBERALIZATION

2,2TRN USD.$ 182,7 20MLN.SQ. THE MEMBER STATES OF THE EURASIAN ECONOMIC UNION. The Republic of Armenia joined the EAEU on 2 January 2015

Brazil - U.S. Business Council

World Bank. Services Trade and International Negotiations Course April 20, A Practical Approach to Analyzing U.S.

Tariffs and imports: Summary and duty ranges Summary

ALADI Initiatives on Non-Tariff Measures

Trade, sanctions, and economic issues in EU- Russian Relations

Agreement setting up a free trade area between the Arab Mediterranean countries

Domestic and Regional Policies to Promote Services Trade in China

The European Union Trade Policy

ECONOMIC REPORT CARD. Quarter 3 (July 1 - Sept 30, 2017)

Democratic Republic of the Congo

( ) Page: 1/8 FREE TRADE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHEAST ASIAN NATIONS (ASEAN) AND INDIA (GOODS) QUESTIONS AND REPLIES

Haiti WORLD TARIFF PROFILES 2008 COUNTRY PAGES. Haiti. Tariffs and imports: Summary and duty ranges Summary

The Rising Importance of Non-tariff Measures in China s Trade Policy. Zhaohui Niu School of Public Administration, Beihang University, Beijing, China

CETA: Opportunities for the United Kingdom 1. Discussion Paper

APEC s Bogor Goals Progress Report (as at 8 August 2014) Highlights of Achievements and Areas for Improvement

WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION

FRAMEWORK AGREEMENT ON COMPREHENSIVE ECONOMIC COOPERATION BETWEEN THE ASSOCIATION OF SOUTH EAST ASIAN NATIONS AND THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA

Introduction to the GATS

Transcription:

19 January 2015 (15-0350) Page: 1/79 Committee on Regional Trade Agreements FACTUAL PRESENTATION TRADE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE EUROPEAN UNION AND ITS MEMBER STATES, OF THE ONE PART AND COLOMBIA AND PERU, OF THE OTHER (GOODS AND SERVICES) Report by the Secretariat This report, prepared for the consideration of the Trade Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one Part and Colombia and Peru of the other, has been drawn up by the WTO Secretariat on its own responsibility and in full consultation with the Parties. The factual presentation reproduces as closely as possible the terminology used in the Agreement and in the comments provided and does not imply official endorsement or acceptance by the Secretariat of such terminology. The report has been drawn up in accordance with the rules and procedures contained in the Decision for a Transparency Mechanism for Regional Trade Agreements (WT/L/671) and thus does not imply any value judgement by the Secretariat regarding the contents of the Agreement. Any technical questions arising from this report may be addressed to Mr Jean-Daniel Rey (tel: +41 22 739 5264). Any statistical questions arising from this report may be addressed to Ms Rowena Cabos (+41 22 739 5185) or to Ms Alejandra Barajas Barbosa (+41 22 739 6425).

- 2 - TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1 TRADE ENVIRONMENT... 5 1.1 Merchandise trade... 5 1.2 Trade in services and investment... 8 2 CHARACTERISTIC ELEMENTS OF THE AGREEMENT... 11 2.1 Background Information... 11 2.2 Structure of the Agreement... 11 3 PROVISIONS ON TRADE IN GOODS... 13 3.1 Import duties and charges, and quantitative restrictions... 13 3.1.1 General provisions... 13 3.1.2 Liberalization of trade and tariff lines... 13 3.1.3 Liberalization schedules... 14 3.1.3.1 European Union... 14 3.1.3.2 Colombia... 17 3.1.3.3 Peru... 19 3.1.4 Tariff rate quotas... 22 3.2 Rules of origin... 22 3.3 Export duties and charges, and quantitative restrictions... 24 3.4 Regulatory provisions on trade in goods... 24 3.4.1 Standards... 24 3.4.1.1 Sanitary and phytosanitary measures (SPS)... 24 3.4.1.2 Technical barriers to trade (TBT)... 25 3.4.2 Safeguard mechanisms... 26 3.4.2.1 Global safeguards... 26 3.4.2.2 Bilateral safeguards... 26 3.4.2.3 Special safeguards on agricultural products... 27 3.4.2.4 Safeguard measures related to balance of payment (BOP) difficulties... 27 3.4.3 Anti-dumping and countervailing measures... 27 3.4.4 Subsidies and State-aid... 28 3.4.5 Customs-related procedures... 28 3.4.6 Other regulations... 29 3.4.6.1 State Trading Enterprises... 29 3.5 Sector-specific provisions on trade in goods... 29 3.5.1 Agricultural goods... 29 4 PROVISIONS ON TRADE IN SERVICES... 29 4.1 Scope and definitions... 29 4.2 Denial of benefits... 30 4.3 General provisions on trade in services... 30 4.3.1 National treatment and MFN... 30

- 3-4.3.2 Market access... 30 4.3.3 Commercial presence... 30 4.3.4 Performance requirements... 31 4.3.5 Movement of natural persons... 31 4.4 Liberalization commitments... 32 4.4.1 The European Union... 32 4.4.1.1 Sector specific commitments... 32 4.4.2 Colombia... 36 4.4.2.1 Sector specific commitments... 36 4.4.3 Peru... 40 4.4.3.1 Sector specific commitments... 40 4.5 Regulatory provisions... 43 4.5.1 Domestic regulation... 43 4.5.2 Recognition... 44 4.5.3 Subsidies... 44 4.5.4 Safeguards... 44 4.5.5 Other... 44 4.5.5.1 Investment... 44 4.5.5.2 Monopolies and exclusive service suppliers... 44 4.5.5.3 Transfers and payments... 44 4.5.5.4 Transparency... 44 4.6 Sector specific provisions on trade in services... 45 4.6.1 Computer services... 45 4.6.2 Postal and courier services... 45 4.6.3 Telecommunications services... 45 4.6.4 Financial services... 45 4.6.5 International maritime transport services... 45 4.6.6 Electronic commerce... 46 5 GENERAL PROVISIONS OF THE AGREEMENT... 46 5.1 Transparency... 46 5.2 Current payments and capital movements... 46 5.3 Exceptions... 47 5.3.1 General exceptions... 47 5.3.2 Security exceptions... 47 5.3.3 Taxation... 47 5.4 Accession and Withdrawal... 48 5.5 Government procurement... 48 5.6 Intellectual property rights... 49 5.7 Others... 51 5.7.1 Environment and labour... 51

- 4-5.7.2 Competition policy... 52 5.7.3 Technical assistance and trade-capacity building... 53 5.8 Dispute settlement... 53 5.9 Institutional framework... 55 5.10 Relationship with other agreements concluded by the Parties... 57 ANNEX 1... 60 ANNEX 2... 68 ANNEX 3... 72

- 5 - Key Facts Parties to the Agreement: European Union and its Member States, Colombia and Peru Date of Signature: 26 June 2012 Date of Entry into Force: EU - Peru: 1 March 2013 EU - Colombia: 1 August 2013 Date of Notification: EU Peru; 26 February 2013 Full implementation: EU Colombia: 29 November 2013 Goods EU - Peru: 1 March 2030 EU - Colombia: 1 August 2028 Services EU - Peru: 1 March 2013 EU - Colombia: 1 August 2013 1 TRADE ENVIRONMENT 1 1.1. The Trade Agreement between the European Union and its Member States (hereinafter the EU), on the one part and Colombia and Peru, of the other, (hereinafter referred to as the Agreement) is the EU's 33 rd, Colombia's 10 th and Peru's 17 th regional trade agreement (RTA) 2. 1.2. In 2012, with a population of 504 million, the EU's GDP was estimated at US$16,604 billion, while that of Colombia, with a population of 47.7 million, and of Peru, with a population of 30 million, and was estimated respectively at US$370 billion and US$197 billion. The EU mainly traded manufactured products (representing 79% of the EU's exports and 54% of imports). Colombia and Peru mainly exported fuels and mining products (representing 67% of Colombia's exports and 50% of Peru's exports), and mainly imported manufactured products (76% of Colombia's imports, and 73% of Peru's imports). Averaged over the period 2010-2012, the Parties' trade (goods and services) to GDP ratio was 33.8 for the EU, 35.1 for Colombia and 50.5 for Peru. 1.1 Merchandise trade 1.3. In 2012, the EU's shares in total world exports and imports were 14.7% and 15.4% respectively, while those for Colombia were 0.33% for exports and 0.32% for imports and 0.25% for exports and 0.23% for imports for Peru. With total merchandise exports of US$2,167 billion and imports of US$2,301 billion, the EU was the world largest global exporter and second largest importer, while Colombia ranked 39 th largest exporter and 32 nd largest importer (with exports of US$60.3 billion and imports of US$59 billion), and Peru ranked 43 rd largest exporter and 41 st largest importer (with exports of US$45.6 billion and imports of US$42.5 billion). 1.4. In 2012, the EU was Colombia and Peru's 3 rd largest source of imports 3, and Colombia's 2 nd and Peru's 1 st largest destination for exports 4. Colombia was the EU's 42 nd largest source of 1 Source for this section: WTO Trade Profiles 2013 (2012 data). Export figures are calculated f.o.b. and import figures are calculated c.i.f. Ranking in world trade excluding intra-eu trade. For bilateral trade, the figures are based on UNSD Comtrade. 2 Agreements in goods and services counted as one and only agreements in force, notified to the WTO. 3 In 2012, the five top sources of imports for Colombia were: the US (24.3%); China (16.5%); the EU(27) (12.6%); Mexico (10.9%); and Brazil (4.8%). The five top sources of imports for Peru were: the US (19%); China (18.5%); the EU(27) (11.9%); Brazil (6.1%); and Ecuador (4.8%).

- 6 - imports 5 and 47 th largest export 6, while Peru was the EU's 45 th largest source of imports and 90 th destination for exports. 1.5. Developments in global and intra-party trade are presented in Charts 1.1. and 1.2 over the period 2000-2013. The EU's trade deficit with both partners and especially with Peru widened during this period. The EU also maintained a global deficit for much of the period, while Colombia's trade has been in balance and Peru has shown a steady surplus in its trade balance for most of the period. Chart 1.1 European Union and Colombia: bilateral and total merchandise trade 2,000 1,800 1,600 1,400 A. European Union 2000-2013 (EUR$ Billions) Imports from Colombia (Right Axis) Exports to Colombia (Right Axis) Total Imports Total Exports 12.0 10.8 9.6 8.4 50 45 40 35 B. Colombia 2000-2012 (EUR$ Billions) Imports from EU (Right Axis) Exports to EU (Right Axis) Total Imports Total Exports 8.00 7.20 6.40 5.60 1,200 7.2 30 4.80 1,000 6.0 25 4.00 800 4.8 20 3.20 600 3.6 15 2.40 400 2.4 10 1.60 200 1.2 5 0.80 0 0.0 0 0.00 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Note: European Union covers data from EU (15) from 2000-2003, EU (25) from 2004-2006 and EU (27) from 2007-2012. Trade flows excludes intra-eu trade. Source: EUROSTAT and UNSD Comtrade database. Chart 1.2 European Union and Peru: bilateral and total merchandise trade, 2000-2012 2,000 1,800 1,600 1,400 A. European Union 2000-2013 (EUR$ Billions) Imports from Peru (Right Axis) Exports to Peru (Right Axis) Total Imports Total Exports 10.00 9.00 8.00 7.00 40 36 32 28 B. Peru 2000-2012 (EUR$ Billions) Imports from Peru (Right Axis) Exports to Peru (Right Axis) Total Imports Total Exports 10.00 9.00 8.00 7.00 1,200 6.00 24 6.00 1,000 5.00 20 5.00 800 4.00 16 4.00 600 3.00 12 3.00 400 2.00 8 2.00 200 1.00 4 1.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Note: European Union covers data from EU (15) from 2000-2003, EU (25) from 2004-2006 and EU (27) from 2007-2012. Trade flows excludes intra-eu trade. Source: EUROSTAT and UNSD Comtrade database. 4 In 2012, the five top destinations for Colombian exports were: the US (36.9%); the EU(27) (15.1%); China (5.6%); Panama (4.8%); Venezuela (4.3%). The five top destinations for Peruvian exports were: the EU(27) (17.1%); China (17.1%); the US (14.2%); Switzerland (11%); and Canada (7.5%). 5 In 2012, the five top sources of imports for the EU(28) were: China (16.5%); Russia (12.2%); the US (11.6%); Switzerland (5.6%); and Norway (5.3%). 6 In 2012, the five top destinations for the EU(28)'s exports were: Switzerland (16.5%); Russia (9.7%); the US (8.5%); China (6.9%); and Norway (4.5%).

- 7-1.6. The commodity structure of trade between Colombia and the EU, between Peru and the EU, and between each Party and the world, during the period 2010-2012, is shown in Charts 1.3 and 1.4, on the basis of Harmonized System (HS) Sections. 1.7. With regard to bilateral trade relations between Colombia and the EU, machinery and chemicals together accounted for 51% of Colombia's imports from the EU (26% for machinery and 25% for chemicals), while machinery represented 24% and chemicals 14% of Colombia's global imports. Machinery was the EU's largest global export sector (27%), while chemicals ranked 2 nd (representing 15% of the EU's global exports). Vehicles, Colombia's third largest import from the EU (22% of Colombia's imports from the EU), accounted for 16% of Colombia's global imports and represented 55% of the EU's global exports. These figures tend to show that Colombia's profile of imports from the EU is representative of both Colombia's global import profile and the EU's global export profile. In the case of the EU, minerals, its largest import from Colombia (representing 63% of the EU's imports from Colombia) is also the EU's largest global import (30% of the EU's global imports). This sector also corresponds to Colombia's largest global export sector (63%). Chart 1.3 Colombia and European Union (27) Product Composition of merchandise trade, annual average (2010-2012) Colombia's imports from the EU Colombia's Global Imports EU's Global Exports 26 24 27 5 7 5 32 5 22 25 4 3 9 4 5 6 8 8 14 16 4 2 4 4 5 7 7 11 15 15 Total: 5.1 billion EU's imports from Colombia Total: 38.4 billion EU's Global Imports Total: 1537 billion Colombia's Global Exports 20 5 2 10 63 2 2 7 3 33 4 5 6 6 8 30 2 7 4 33 4 6 8 63 21 Total: 6.7 billion Total: 1686 billion Total: 39.3 billion Vegetables Prepared foods Chemicals Plastics, rubber Textiles Precious Stones Machinery Vehicles Miscellaneous Other Minerals Wood pulp Base Metals Optical Source: UNSD Comtrade. 1.8. Like between the EU and Colombia, machinery and chemicals together accounted for 58% of Peru's imports from the EU (43% for machinery and 15% for chemicals), but machinery represented 25% and chemicals 10% of Peru's global imports. Base metals, Peru's third largest import from the EU (10% of Peru's imports from the EU), accounted for 9% of Peru's global imports and represented only 7% of the EU's global exports. In the case of the EU, minerals, its

- 8 - largest import from Peru (representing 43% of the EU's imports from Peru) is also the EU's largest global import and corresponds to Peru's second largest global export sector (15%). Chart 1.4 Peru and European Union (27): Product Composition of merchandise trade, annual average (2010-2012) Peru's imports from the EU Peru's Global Imports EU's Global Exports 25 27 4 43 5 9 10 8 15 43 4 2 9 4 4 7 9 10 11 15 4 2 4 4 5 7 7 11 15 15 Total: 3.0 billion Total: 27.6 billion Total: 1,537 billion EU's imports from Peru EU's Global Imports Peru's Global Exports 25 3 3 22 3 9 14 19 43 2 2 7 3 33 4 5 6 6 8 30 4 2 9 4 4 7 9 10 11 15 21 Total: 6.0 million Total: 1,686 billion Total: 27.6 billion Animal products Minerals Wood pulp Base Metals Optical Vegetables Chemicals Textiles Machinery Miscellaneous Prepared foods Plastics, rubber Precious Stones Vehicles Other Source: UNSD Comtrade. 1.2 Trade in services and investment 1.9. In 2012, the EU's shares of total commercial services exports and imports were 24.8% and 20.13% respectively, while Colombia's and Peru's shares were 0.12% and 0.11% of world imports of services and 0.25% and 0.17% of world exports of services. With total commercial services exports of US$831 billion, and imports of US$651 billion, the EU was the world's largest exporter and largest importer of commercial services. Colombia's and Peru's shares in global trade are of the same magnitude, Colombia was the 47 th largest exporter (US$5.1 billion) and 43 rd largest importer (US$10.4 billion), while Peru was the 48 th largest exporter (US$4.9 billion) and 46 th largest importer (US$7.2 billion). 1.10. Charts 1.5-1.7 below show global trade in commercial services for Colombia, for Peru and for the EU (all based on data for the period 2000-2012).While Colombia and Peru experienced a deficit and their global trade in services, the balance for the EU is positive, with a volume of trade one hundred times bigger than for Peru and fifty times bigger than for Colombia. For all the Parties, trade in services has grown during the period, though for Colombia and, to a certain extent, for Peru the trade volume momentarily slowed down in 2004. The 2008-2009 financial crisis also had a negative, but temporary, impact on trade growth for all the Parties. Travel and

- 9 - transportation services account for a large share of services traded by all the Parties with other business services important exports and imports for the EU. Chart 1.5 Colombia: Trade in commercial services with the world, 2000-2012 4.50 A. Colombia: Exports (EUR Billion) 4.50 10.00 B. Colombia: Imports (EUR Billion) 10.00 4.00 4.00 9.00 9.00 3.50 3.50 8.00 8.00 3.00 2.50 2.00 1.50 3.00 2.50 2.00 1.50 7.00 6.00 5.00 4.00 3.00 7.00 6.00 5.00 4.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 0.50 0.50 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 Transportation services Insurance services Royalties and license fees Travel Financial services Other business services Communications services Computer and information Personal, cultural and Construction services recreational services Note: Source: Data on Other business services for 2000-2005 and 2007, may include more categories than the international agreed definition. WTO-iTip database and Central Bank of Colombia (Banco de la República). Chart 1.6 Peru: Trade in commercial services with the world, 2000-2012 4.50 A. Peru: Exports (EUR Billion) 4.50 5.00 B. Peru: Imports (EUR Billion) 5.00 4.00 4.00 4.50 4.50 3.50 3.50 4.00 4.00 3.00 2.50 2.00 1.50 3.00 2.50 2.00 1.50 3.50 3.00 2.50 2.00 1.50 3.50 3.00 2.50 2.00 1.50 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 Transportation services Insurance services Royalties and license fees Travel Financial services Other business services Communications services Computer and information Personal, cultural and Construction services recreational services Note: Source: Data on Other business services for 2000-2006 may include more categories than the international agreed definition. WTO-iTip database.

- 10 - Chart 1.7 European Union: Trade in commercial services with the world, 2000-2012 700 A. European Union: Exports (EUR Billion) 700 500 B. European Union: Imports (EUR Billion) 500 630 630 450 450 560 560 400 400 490 490 350 350 420 420 300 300 350 350 250 250 280 280 200 200 210 210 150 150 140 140 100 100 70 70 50 50 0 0 0 0 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 Transportation services Insurance services Royalties and license fees Travel Financial services Other business services Communications services Computer and information Personal, cultural and Construction services recreational services Note: European Union covers data from EU (15) from 2000-2003, EU (25) from 2004-2006 and EU (27) from 2007-2012. Trade flows excludes intra-eu trade. Source: EUROSTAT. 1.11. Chart 1.8 below depicts each Party's foreign direct investment stock with the world which has grown steadily during the period 2000-2012. While the EU is a net investor in the world, both Colombia and Peru are net recipients of FDI. Chart 1.8 Colombia, Peru and the European Union: Foreign direct investment stock with the world, 2000-2012 100.0 90.0 80.0 Inward Outward A. Colombia (EUR Billion) 100.0 90.0 80.0 50.0 45.0 40.0 B. Peru (EUR Billion) Inward Outward (Right Axis) 10.0 9.0 8.0 70.0 70.0 35.0 7.0 60.0 60.0 30.0 6.0 50.0 50.0 25.0 5.0 40.0 40.0 20.0 4.0 30.0 30.0 15.0 3.0 20.0 20.0 10.0 2.0 10.0 10.0 5.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 0.0 0.0 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 6,000 5,400 4,800 4,200 3,600 3,000 2,400 1,800 1,200 600 Inward Outward C. European Union (EUR Billion) 6,000 5,400 4,800 4,200 3,600 3,000 2,400 1,800 1,200 600 0 0 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 Note: European Union covers data from EU (15) from 2000-2003, EU (25) from 2004-2006 and EU (27) from 2007-2012. Trade flows excludes intra-eu trade.

- 11-2 CHARACTERISTIC ELEMENTS OF THE AGREEMENT 2.1 Background Information 2.1. The Agreement was signed on 26 June 2012 and started its application, for the EU and Peru, on 1 March 2013, and, for the EU and Colombia, on 1 August 2013. The Parties notified the goods and services aspects of the Agreement to the WTO on 26 February 2013, for the EU and Peru, in document WT/REG333/N/1/Rev.1 - S/C/N/681/Rev.1, and on 29 November 2013, for the EU and Colombia, in documents WT/REG333/N/1 - S/C/N/681 and WT/REG333/N/2 - S/C/N/681/Rev.1/Add.1. The notification was made pursuant to Article XXIV:7(a) of GATT 1994 for goods, and to Article V:7(a) of GATS for services. The text of the Agreement, together with its annexes, is available on the Parties' official websites: European Union: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/johtml.do?uri=oj:l:2012:354:som:en:html http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/press/index.cfm?id=691 Colombia: http://www.tlc.gov.co/publicaciones.php?id=4603 Peru: http://www.acuerdoscomerciales.gob.pe/index.php?option=com_content&view=category&layout= blog&id=52&itemid=75 2.2. According to Article 3, the Agreement establishes a free trade area consistent with Article XXIV of the GATT 1994 and Article V of the GATS. 2.3. While the provisions of the Agreement apply to the bilateral trade and economic relations between, on the one part, the EU (and its Member States within their respective areas of competence), and, on the other, Colombia and Peru, they do not apply to the trade and economic relations between Colombia and Peru, as individual signatory Andean Countries. The rights and obligations established by the Parties in the Agreement shall not affect the rights and obligations between the signatory Andean Countries as Member Countries of the Andean Community (Article 7). 2.4. The Agreement was negotiated and signed at a time the EU had 27 Member States. It was applied between the EU and Peru before, and between the EU and Colombia shortly after, Croatia's accession to the EU, on 1 July 2013. As per Article 6 of the Act concerning Croatia's accession, all RTAs concluded by the EU become binding on Croatia as from 1 July 2013. Pending the conclusion of a Protocol to the Agreement, Croatia would apply the provisions of the Agreement, with the necessary adjustments. The relevant Protocol has been agreed between the Parties and is undergoing the respective internal procedures for its approval. The Protocol integrates the relevant new language versions of administrative remarks contained in Annex II to the Trade Agreement (Annex on the Rules of Origin) and adds the commitments of Croatia for trade in services, establishments and electronic commerce, as well as for government procurement. 2.2 Structure of the Agreement 2.5. The Agreement is composed of 14 Titles and related annexes, as well as Appendices and the Parties' tariff elimination schedules, lists of commitments on establishment and cross-border supply of services, and reservations on temporary presence of natural persons for business purposes. Box 2.1 below summarizes the structure of the Agreement. Box 2.1 Structure of the Agreement Chapters, Annexes, and Appendixes Title/description Preamble Title I Initial provisions

- 12 - Title II Title III Chapter 1 Chapter 2 Chapter 3 Chapter 4 Chapter 5 Chapter 6 Chapter 7 Title IV Chapter 1 Chapter 2 Chapter 3 Chapter 4 Chapter 5 Chapter 6 Chapter 7 Title V Title VI Title VII Title VIII Title IX Title X Title XI Title XII Title XIII Title XIV Annex I Annex II Annex III Annex IV Annex V Annex VI Annex VII Annex VIII Annex IX Annex X Annex XI Annex XII Annex XIII Institutional provisions Trade in goods Market access for goods Trade remedies Customs and trade facilitation Technical barriers to trade Sanitary and Phytosanitary measures Movement of goods Exceptions Trade in services, establishment and electronic commerce General provisions Establishment Cross-border supply services Temporary presence of natural persons for business purposes Regulatory framework Electronic commerce Exceptions Current payments and movement of capital Government procurement Intellectual property Competition Trade and sustainable development Transparency and administrative proceedings General exceptions Dispute settlement Technical assistance and trade-capacity building Final provisions Tariff elimination Schedules Concerning the definition of the concept of "originating products" and methods for administrative cooperation Special provisions on administrative cooperation Agricultural safeguard measures Mutual administrative assistance in customs matters Sanitary and phytosanitary measures Lists of commitments on establishment Lists of commitments on cross-border supply of services Reservations regarding temporary presence of natural persons for business purposes Enquiry points regarding trade in services, establishment and electronic commerce Understanding concerning subparagraph (b) of the definition of "services supplied in the exercise of governmental authority" (Art. 152 of the Agreement) Government procurement Lists of geographical indications Annex XIV Mediation mechanism for non-tariff measures Source: WTO Secretariat based on the Agreement.

- 13-3 PROVISIONS ON TRADE IN GOODS 3.1. Title III of the Agreement contains disciplines applicable specifically to trade in goods. 3.1 Import duties and charges, and quantitative restrictions 3.1.1 General provisions 3.2. The Parties agree to apply national treatment to each other's' imports in accordance with Article III of GATT 1994 and its interpretative notes, which are incorporated into and made part of the Agreement, mutatis mutandis (Article 21). 3.3. No Party shall adopt or maintain any prohibition or restriction on the import of any good of another Party, except as provided in the Agreement or in accordance with Article XI of GATT 1994, which is, together with its interpretative notes, incorporated into and made part of the Agreement mutatis mutandis (Article 23). 3.4. On the treatment of fees and charges, the Agreement replicates the provisions of Article VIII of GATT 1994 and states that no Party shall require consular transactions, including related fees and charges, in connection with the importation of any goods of another Party (Article 24). Information on all import and export fees and charges shall be made available, preferably on the internet. For the EU this the relevant customs authorities either publish this information online on their websites or make it available through printed publicly available notices. For Peru, the information on import and export fees and charges is available on http://www.sunat.gob.pe/. In the case of Colombia, the information about the import and export fees and charges is available on http://www.dian.gov.co. 3.5. The Agreement prohibits the use of measures that are inconsistent with the WTO Agreement on import licensing procedures, which is incorporated into and made part of the Agreement (Article 26). 3.1.2 Liberalization of trade and tariff lines 3.6. The Parties' tariff elimination commitments are scheduled in Annex I to the Agreement. No Party may increase any customs duty set as the base rate in Annex I or adopt any new customs duty on a good originating in another Party. 3.7. In relation to agricultural goods, the Agreement authorizes Colombia and Peru to apply their Price Band Systems (Article 30). In the case of Colombia, the provision refers to the application of the Andean Price Band System (Price stabilization mechanism MEP) established in Decision 371 of the Andean Community and its modifications, or subsequent systems for agricultural goods covered by such Decision 7. In the case of Peru, this concerns the application of the Peruvian Price Band System (SPFP) established in the Supreme Decree 115-2001-EF and its modifications, or subsequent systems for agricultural goods covered by such Supreme Decree 8. 3.8. Upon request of a Party, the Parties shall consult to consider accelerating and broadening the scope of the duty elimination programme (Article 22). 7 The system operates by establishing a floor price (or lower band) and a ceiling price (or higher band). When the international price is below the floor price, a special import duty is imposed, but when total import costs exceed the higher limit, a tariff reduction is granted. The customs duties applicable to products subject to the price stabilization mechanism are composed of a fixed ad valorem component (subject or not to the liberalization programme established by the Agreement) and a variable ad valorem component. Annex II to the factual presentation summarizes the coverage of Price Band Systems for Colombia. 8 Under the SPFP, a product is subject to a specific custom duty in addition to its ad-valorem customs duty if a CIF reference, price is lower than a "floor" price. A tariff reduction can also apply if the CIF (reference) price is higher than a "ceiling" price. The customs duties applicable to products subject to the price band system are composed of a fixed ad valorem component (subject or not to the liberalization programme established by the Agreement) and a variable specific component. Annex II to the factual presentation summarizes the coverage of Price Band System for Peru.

- 14-3.1.3 Liberalization schedules 3.9. Annex I to the Agreement (Tariff elimination schedules) is divided in two parts (Appendices 1 and 2). 3.10. The first Appendix contains the modalities agreed by the Parties in relation to the elimination of customs duties. 3.11. The second Appendix registers the EU's conventional rates of duty, including seasonal duties, for products from HS Chapters 07 (vegetables), 08 (Fruits and nuts), 20 9 (preparations of vegetables, fruits and nuts), and 22 10 (beverages, spirits and vinegar), in connection with its Entry Price System 11 (Article 31). Section A of Appendix 2 lists the products and entry prices applied by the EU to products from Colombia, while Section B registers the products and entry prices applied by the EU to products from Peru. 3.1.3.1 European Union 3.12. The EU's applied tariff in 2013 consisted of 9,720 lines at the HS eight-digit level (HS 2007). 89.8% of the tariffs was ad valorem and 991 lines had non-ad valorem tariffs 12. Before the entry into force of the Agreement, 2,453 lines were duty free, representing 25.2% of the EU's total tariff. Table 3.1 shows tariff elimination commitments by the EU under the Agreement. 3.13. Regarding the EU's relations with Colombia, the number of the EU's MFN duty free lines corresponded to 77.9% of its imports from Colombia during 2010-2012. Following the entry into force of the Agreement, an additional 6,714 lines (69.1% of the EU's tariff) became duty-free for imports from Colombia. As a result, 94.3% of the EU's tariff was duty free for imports from Colombia (in 2013), corresponding to 87.5% of imports by value from Colombia. By the end of the implementation period, ten years after the entry into force of the Agreement (in 2023), 9,315 tariff lines, corresponding to 95.8% of its tariff or 87.5% of its imports from Colombia will be duty free. 405 tariff lines (corresponding to 4.2% of the EU's tariff) will remain dutiable, representing 12.5% of its imports from Colombia. 3.14. Regarding the EU's relations with Peru, the number of the EU's MFN duty free lines corresponded to 78.5% of its imports from Peru during 2010-2012. Following the entry into force of the Agreement, an additional 6,766 lines (69.6% of the EU's tariff) became duty-free for imports from Peru. As a result, 94.8% of the EU's tariff was duty free for imports from Peru (in 2013), corresponding to 97.3% of imports by value from Peru. By the end of the implementation period, ten years after the entry into force of the Agreement (in 2023), 9,424 tariff lines, corresponding to 97% of its tariff or 97.3% of its imports from Peru will be duty free. 296 tariff lines (corresponding to 3% of the EU's tariff) will remain dutiable, representing 2.7% of the EU's imports from Peru. Table 3.1 European Union: Tariff elimination commitments under the Agreement and corresponding average trade Period No. of lines Commitments applied by the European Union to: % of lines Value of Imports (2010-2012) (in million EUR) % of Total imports Colombia Peru Colombia Peru Colombia Peru Colombia Peru MFN Duty Free (2013) 2,453 2,453 25.2 25.2 5,935.3 5,657.9 77.9 78.5 2013 6,714 6,766 69.1 69.6 730.6 1,353.6 9.6 18.8 2016 32 19 0.3 0.2 1.6 0.2 0.0 0.0 9 Only in the case of EU's Entry Price System applicable to Colombia. 10 Only in the case of EU's Entry Price System applicable to Colombia. 11 The EU Entry Price System is established by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1580/2207 of 21 December 2007 laying down implementing rules of Council Regulations (EC) No 2200/96, (EC) No 2201/96 and (EC) No 1182/2007 in the fruit and vegetable sector and its modifications or subsequent systems. 12 636 lines were specific, 196 consisted in compound duties, 72 were mixed, and 87 were classified as other duties.

- 15 - Commitments applied by the European Union to: Period No. of lines % of lines Value of Imports (2010-2012) (in million EUR) % of Total imports Colombia Peru Colombia Peru Colombia Peru Colombia Peru 2018 39 19 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.5 0.0 0.0 2020 62 146 0.6 1.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2023 15 21 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Remain Dutiable 405 296 4.2 3.0 955.4 196.9 12.5 2.7 Total 9,720 9,720 100.0 100.0 7,623.1 7,209.0 100.0 100.0 Note: Source: For tariff lines subject to TRQs, only the out-of-quota duty is included in the tariff-related calculations; for the calculation of averages, specific rates are excluded and the ad valorem parts of alternate rates are included. Based on HS 2007 nomenclature. WTO estimates based on data provided by the European Union and WTO-IDB database. 3.15. Table 3.2 shows the EU's tariff elimination, by HS section with regard to Colombia and Peru. 3.16. In relation to Colombia, the 405 lines that will remain subject to duties once implementation is completed are found in sections I (live animals), II (vegetables), IV (prepared food) and VI (chemicals), with final average tariffs at between 8.5% and 12%, equal to the MFN applied rate, as illustrated by Chart 3.1 below. 13 For HS Chapters 8, 10, 11, 18 through 22, and 33 only the specific duty will remain. In the case of HS Chapters 7 and 17, the average of the preferential rates is higher than the MFN rate because the ad valorem component is liberalized in the preferential duties only for some of the lines under these Chapters. This is illustrated in Chart 3.1 (part a) below. 3.17. In relation to Peru, the 296 lines that will remain subject to duties once implementation is completed are found in sections I (live animals), II (vegetables), IV (prepared food) and VI (chemicals), with final average tariffs at between 8.4% and 13.3% and, for vegetables, with specific duties only remaining. For HS Sections 2, 16, 29 and 35 the remaining duties are equal to the MFN applied rate. For the other HS Sections where duties remain, the ad valorem part of the duty is removed while the non-ad valorem part is either the MFN applied level or has a preferential margin. This is illustrated in Chart 3.1 (part b) below. 14 13 Only the out-of-quota duty is included in the tariff-related calculations. 14 Only the out-of-quota duty is included in the tariff-related calculations.

- 16 - Table 3.2 European Union: Tariff elimination commitments to Colombia and to Peru under the Agreement, by HS Section and corresponding average trade Partner Colombia Peru HS section MFN average % Total No. of lines MFN Duty- Free (2013) Number of duty-free lines under the Agreement 2013 2016 2018 2020 2023 Remain dutiable Avg. Duty I 8.7 803 113 408 5 25 51 15 186 10.9 II 5.8 531 125 302 7 9 3 85 12.0 III 6.0 124 21 101 1 1 IV 13.6 834 93 606 18 1 7 109 12.0 V 0.7 244 180 64 VI 4.2 1,272 343 904 25 8.5 VII 4.7 351 67 284 VIII 3.0 150 43 107 IX 2.3 213 99 114 X 0.0 220 220 XI 7.9 1190 45 1145 XII 8.0 113 2 111 XIII 4.0 258 34 224 XIV 0.7 63 48 15 XV 1.9 999 511 483 1 4 XVI 2.4 1,477 318 1,159 XVII 4.7 287 32 255 XVIII 2.5 339 92 247 XIX 2.2 27 5 22 XX 2.6 218 55 163 XXI 0.0 7 7 0 Total 4.8 9,720 2,453 6,714 32 39 62 15 405 10.4 I 8.7 803 113 408 2 12 143 17 108 13.3 II 5.8 531 126 335 4 66 * III 6.0 124 21 102 1 IV 13.5 834 93 621 12 2 3 4 99 11.4 V 0.7 244 180 64 VI 4.2 1,272 343 906 23 8.4 VII 4.7 351 67 284 VIII 3.0 150 43 107 IX 2.3 213 99 114 X 0.0 220 220 XI 7.9 1190 45 1145 XII 8.0 113 2 111 XIII 4.0 258 34 224 XIV 0.7 63 48 15 XV 1.9 999 511 483 1 4 XVI 2.4 1,477 318 1,159 XVII 4.7 287 32 255 XVIII 2.5 339 92 247 XIX 2.2 27 5 22 XX 2.6 218 55 163 XXI 0.0 7 7 Total 4.8 9,720 2,454 6,765 19 19 146 21 296 11.5 * Only includes specific duties. Note: Source: For tariff lines subject to TRQs, only the out-of-quota duty is included; for the calculation of averages, specific rates are excluded and the ad valorem parts of alternate rates are included. Based on HS 2007 nomenclature. WTO estimates based on data provided by the European Union and WTO-IDB database.

- 17 - Chart 3.1 European Union: Average of dutiable rates, by HS Chapter, with regard to Colombia and Peru 25 a. EU-Colombia (HS 01-97) 25 b. EU-Peru (HS 01-97) 20 MFN Preferential 20 MFN Preferential 15 15 10 10 5 5 0 02 04 07 *08 *10*11 16 17 *18 *19*20*21*22 29 *33 35 38 0 02 *04*07*08*10*11 16 *17*18*19*20*21*22 29 *33 35 38 * Only includes specific duties. The average of the preferential rates is higher than the MFN because the ad valorem component is liberalized in the preferential duties for some of the lines under this chapter. Note: Source: For tariff lines subject to TRQs, only the out-of-quota duty is included in the tariff-related calculations; for the calculation of averages, specific rates are excluded and the ad valorem parts of alternate rates are included. Based on HS 2012 nomenclature. WTO estimates based on data provided by the European Union and WTO-IDB database. 3.1.3.2 Colombia 3.18. Table 3.3 shows tariff elimination commitments by Colombia under the Agreement. Colombia's applied tariff in 2013 consisted of 7,454 lines 15 at the HS eight-digit level (HS 2012). 93.14% of the tariffs were ad valorem and 511 lines had non-ad valorem tariffs (all compound duties). In 2013, 264 lines were duty free, representing 3.5% of Colombia's total tariff, corresponding to 20.9% of its imports from the EU during 2010-2012. Following the entry into force of the Agreement, an additional 4,291 lines (57.6% of Colombia's tariff) became duty-free resulting in 61.1% of Colombia's tariff becoming duty free corresponding to 66.4% of its imports from the EU (in 2013). Ten years after the entry into force of the Agreement (in 2023), 7,143 tariff lines, or 95.8% of its imports from the EU will be duty free. By the end of the implementation period (2028), 7,160 tariff lines, or 96.1% of its imports from the EU will be duty free. 294 tariff lines (corresponding to 3.9% of Colombia's tariff) will remain dutiable, representing 0.6% of Colombia's imports from the EU. This includes the tariff lines for which the fixed component resulting from the price stabilization mechanism 16 is liberalized under Colombia's price band system. 15 It should however be noted that the negotiations were based on HS 2007 classification and that the total number of lines, on that basis, was 7.280. On the basis of HS 2007, 282 tariff lines remained dutiable. 16 The customs duties applicable to products subject to the price stabilization mechanism are composed of a fixed ad valorem component (subject or not to the liberalization programme established by the Agreement), and a flexible component (a specific amount added or deducted depending on the evolution of the international price for certain commodities).

- 18 - Table 3.3 Colombia: Tariff elimination commitments under the Agreement and corresponding average trade Duty phase-out period Number of lines % of total lines in Colombia's tariff schedule Value of Colombia's imports from the European Union (2010-2012) in million EUR a % of Colombia's total imports from the European Union (2010-2012) MFN Duty Free- 264 3.5 993.9 20.9 2013 2013 4,291 57.6 2162.4 45.5 2016 154 2.1 13.4 0.3 2018 1208 16.2 771.9 16.2 2020 545 7.3 480.4 10.1 2023 681 9.1 298.2 6.3 2025 1 0.0 2.2 0.0 2028 16 0.2 5.2 0.1 Remain dutiable 294 b 3.9 29.2 0.6 Total 7,454 100 4,756.92 100 a b Note: Source: Exchange rates used for converting from US dollars to Euros were: 0.76 (2010), 0.72 (2011) and 0.78 (2012). This number includes the 134 lines in relation to the price stabilization mechanism, where 53 tariff lines containing fixed component were liberalized under the Agreement. For tariff lines subject to TRQs, only the out-of-quota duty is included in the tariff-related calculations. Based on HS 2012 nomenclature. WTO estimates based on data provided by Colombia and WTO-IDB database. 3.19. Table 3.4 shows Colombia's tariff elimination, by HS section. The 294 lines that will remain subject to duties once implementation is completed are found in sections I (live animals); II (vegetable products), III (animal or vegetable fats and oils), IV (prepared food) and VI (chemicals) with final average tariffs at between 10% and 32.9%, with differences between the MFN rate and the preferential rate in HS Chapters 2, 7, 8, 11, 12, 15, 16 through 21, 23 and 33, as illustrated by Chart 3.2 below. 17 The highest average tariffs are found in HS 5 (70%), 2 (36%) and 10 (35.8%). Table 3.4 Colombia: Tariff elimination commitments under the Agreement, by HS Section and corresponding average trade HS Section MFN average % Total No. of lines MFN dutyfree (2013) 2013 Number of duty-free lines 2016 2018 2020 2023 2025 2028 No. of lines remaining dutiable Avg. Final Tariff (Dutiable) % I 19.8 413 296 3 14 7 11 13 69 32.9 II 13.2 427 201 87 49 1 13 76 21.7 III 15.5 66 18 4 1 43 10.0 IV 14.0 310 101 62 32 8 8 1 3 95 11.4 V 5.0 193 1 153 37 2 VI 5.0 1,416 173 901 2 245 29 55 11 10.2 VII 7.5 315 8 115 36 61 95 VIII 8.9 78 27 45 1 5 IX 7.5 108 24 41 1 42 X 8.1 197 14 66 34 61 22 XI 8.6 933 1 820 13 42 57 XII 11.1 55 40 13 2 17 Only the out-of-quota duty is included in the tariff-related calculations. The Chart includes lines under Colombia's price band system. Moreover, in the case of HS Chapter 23, the average of the preferential rates is higher than the MFN because the fixed component only is liberalized for some of the lines under this Chapter.

- 19 - HS Section MFN average % Total No. of lines MFN dutyfree (2013) 2013 Number of duty-free lines 2016 2018 2020 2023 2025 2028 No. of lines remaining dutiable Avg. Final Tariff (Dutiable) % XIII 7.8 167 60 40 37 30 XIV 7.1 59 45 5 3 6 XV 6.3 718 18 350 131 127 92 XVI 6.0 1,231 35 755 288 87 66 XVII 12.2 246 12 55 56 35 88 XVIII 5.7 282 2 234 37 1 8 XIX 14.9 69 11 43 14 1 XX 13.2 164 19 42 29 74 XXI 15.0 7 3 4 Total 8.4 7,454 264 4,291 154 1,208 545 681 1 16 294 b 20.7 a Note: Source: This number includes the lines excluded from the agreement and those whose fix component was liberalized (i.e. 134) under Colombia's price band system. For tariff lines subject to TRQs, only the out-of-quota duty is included in the tariff-related calculations. Based on HS 2012 nomenclature. WTO estimates based on data provided by Colombia and WTO-IDB database. Chart 3.2 Colombia: Average of dutiable rates, by HS Chapter 70 60 Colombia (HS 01-97) MFN Preferential 50 40 30 20 10 0 *02 *04 05 07 08 *10 *11 *12 *15 *16 *17 18 19 20 21 22 * 23 29 33 *35 38 * Includes lines under Colombia's price band system. The average of the preferential rates is higher than the MFN because the fixed component is liberalized for some of the lines under this chapter. Note: For tariff lines subject to TRQs, only the out-of-quota duty is included in the tariff-related calculations; for tariff lines under Colombia's price band system, only the ad valorem part is included in the calculation of averages. Based on HS 2012 nomenclature. Source: WTO estimates based on data provided by Colombia and WTO-IDB. 3.1.3.3 Peru 3.20. Table 3.5 shows tariff elimination commitments by Peru under the Agreement. Peru's applied tariff in 2013 consisted of 7,370 lines at the HS eight-digit level (HS 2007). 99.36% of the

- 20 - tariffs were ad valorem and 47 lines had non-ad valorem tariffs 47 with compound duties 18 ). In 2013, 4,054 lines were duty free, representing 55% of Peru's total tariff, corresponding to 76.2% of its imports from the EU during 2010-2012. Following the entry into force of the Agreement, an additional 1,688 lines (22.9% of Peru's tariff) became duty-free, resulting in 77.9% of Peru's tariff becoming duty free, corresponding to 80.4% of imports by value from the EU. Ten years after the entry into force of the Agreement (in 2023), 7,219 tariff lines, or 98.5% of its imports from the EU will be duty free for the EU's exports. The same figures would be shown by the end of the implementation period (in 2030). 151 tariff lines (corresponding to 2% of Peru's tariff) will remain dutiable, representing 1.5% of Peru's imports from the EU. This includes the 47 tariff lines that are subject to Peru's price band system and are not fully liberalized. Table 3.5 Peru: Tariff elimination commitments under the Agreement and corresponding average trade Duty phase-out period Number of lines % of total lines in Peru's tariff schedule Value of Peru's imports from the European Union (2010-2012) in million EUR a % of Peru's total imports from the European Union (2010-2012) MFN duty free (2013) 4,054 55.0 2,345.2 76.2 2013 1,688 22.9 128.6 4.2 2016 31 0.4 4.9 0.2 2018 520 7.1 217.3 7.1 2019 4 0.1 0.9 0.0 2020 31 0.4 25.1 0.8 2023 891 12.1 309.6 10.1 Remain dutiable 151 b 2.0 45.2 1.5 Total 7,370 100.0 3,076.8 100.0 a b Note: Source: Exchange rates used for converting from US dollars to Euros were: 0.76 (2010), 0.72 (2011) and 0.78 (2012). This number includes the 47 lines subject to a specific duty under Peru's price band system. For tariff lines subject to TRQs, only the out-of-quota duty is included in the tariff-related calculations; for tariff lines under Peru's price band system, only the ad valorem part is included in the calculation of averages. One tariff line which should become duty-free in 2025 is tariff line ex1602900000 partly covered under category 12 (duty-free in 2025) and partly categorized as part of the out-of-quota duty under the TRQ. In relation to eight other tariff lines that should become duty-free in 2028, two tariff lines are under the price band system and six tariff lines are already duty-free at the MFN level. Based on HS 2007 nomenclature. WTO estimates based on data provided by Peru. 3.21. Table 3.6 shows Peru's tariff elimination, by HS section. The 151 lines that will remain subject to duties once implementation is completed are found in sections I (live animals); II (vegetable products), IV (prepared food) and VI (chemicals) with final average tariffs at between 4.1% and 7.9%, with differences between the MFN and preferential average rates in HS Chapters 7, 16 through 21, and 33, as illustrated by Chart 3.3 below. 19 Table 3.6 Peru: Tariff elimination commitments under the Agreement, by HS Section HS Section MFN average % Total No. of lines MFN dutyfree (2013) 2013 Number of duty-free lines 2016 2018 2019 2020 2023 No. of lines remaining dutiable Avg. Final Tariff (Dutiable) % I 2.3 308 185 47 9 16 51 7.9 II 4.4 384 121 108 10 91 2 29 23 6.3 III 2.6 64 36 7 1 9 11 IV 3.8 301 113 31 18 29 4 31 75 4.1 18 It should be noted that, out of the 47 lines, 44 lines have an ad valorem component of 0%. 19 Only the out-of-quota duty is included in the tariff-related calculations.

- 21 - HS Section MFN average % Total No. of lines MFN dutyfree (2013) 2013 Number of duty-free lines 2016 2018 2019 2020 2023 No. of lines remaining dutiable Avg. Final Tariff (Dutiable) % V 1.8 214 151 53 9 1 VI 2.0 1,465 970 234 2 171 2 84 2 4.5 VII 2.2 312 196 12 13 91 VIII 5.3 79 9 24 11 2 33 IX 4.4 107 28 8 28 1 42 X 3.7 246 93 28 22 4 99 XI 9.2 966 63 850 13 2 38 XII 8.8 56 31 23 2 XIII 2.3 174 106 13 17 1 37 XIV 3.5 57 24 19 2 2 10 XV 1.0 700 581 22 6 4 87 XVI 1.1 1,195 991 94 25 5 80 XVII 1.2 226 181 6 4 4 31 XVIII 2.4 290 175 85 10 20 XIX 6.0 69 7 21 41 XX 4.8 150 31 9 7 2 101 XXI 6.0 7 7 Total 3.2 7,370 4,054 1,688 31 520 4 31 891 151 5.4 Note: Source: For tariff lines subject to TRQs, only the out-of-quota duty is included in the tariff-related calculations; for tariff lines under Peru's price band system, only the ad valorem part is included in the calculation of averages. Based on HS 2007 nomenclature. WTO estimates based on data provided by Peru. Chart 3.3 Peru: Average of dutiable rates, by HS Chapter 9 8 7 HS 01-97 MFN Preferential 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 02 *04 07 08 *10 11 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 *23 33 35 * Includes lines under Peru's price band system, with an ad-valorem fixed component of 0. Includes lines under Peru's price band system, with an ad-valorem fixed component of 6%. Note: Source: For tariff lines subject to TRQs, only the out-of-quota duty is included in the tariff-related calculations; for tariff lines under Peru's price band system, only the ad valorem part is included in the calculation of averages. Based on HS 2007 nomenclature. WTO estimates based on data provided by Peru.

- 22-3.1.4 Tariff rate quotas 3.22. Each Party shall implement and administer tariff rate quotas (TRQs) for imports of agricultural goods set out in Annex I to the Agreement (tariff elimination Schedules) in accordance with Article XIII of GATT 1994, including its interpretative notes, and the WTO Import Licensing Agreement (Article 33). TRQ administration shall take place on a first-come first-served basis. Consultations are also foreseen upon the request of an exporting Party on the administration of the TRQs. Annex 3 to this factual presentation identifies the tariff lines covered by each Party's TRQ commitments. 3.23. The tariff elimination Schedule of Colombia for goods originating in the EU 20 identifies 14 categories of tariff elimination 21 providing for transition periods during which a preferential TRQ is granted by Colombia to specific products originating in the EU. Each concerned category identifies: (i) the tariff lines covered; (ii) the in-quota customs duty; (iii) the quota quantity 22 on the entry into force of the Agreement; and (iv) the yearly increase in the quota. For 8 of these categories, goods imported in quantities exceeding the cumulated amount for each year shall receive MFN treatment. In the case of the 6 remaining categories, at the end of the transition periods, the TRQ and duties will be eliminated. 3.24. The tariff elimination Schedule of the EU for goods originating in Colombia 23 identifies 9 categories of tariff elimination 24 and 19 categories of tariff elimination programmes 25 for Peru providing for transition periods during which a preferential tariff rate quota (TRQ) is granted by the EU to specific products. Each concerned category identifies: (i) the tariff lines covered; (ii) the aggregate quota quantity on the entry into force of the Agreement; and (iii) the yearly increase in the quota. For one of these TRQ categories, a trigger import volume is connected to a stabilisation mechanism allowing in particular circumstances the suspension by the EU of the preferential customs duty and the opening of consultations between the Parties. Moreover, the EU and Colombia and Peru shall examine the improvement of tariff liberalization for the concerned goods in 2019. 3.25. The tariff elimination schedule of Peru for goods originating in the EU 26 identifies 16 categories of products 27 which are, in certain cases to become duty free after a transition period, or in other cases excluded from tariff elimination. Nevertheless, for these categories Peru shall allow duty-free imports within preferential TRQs. Each concerned category identifies: (i) the tariff lines covered; (ii) the aggregate quota quantity on the entry into force of the Agreement; and (iii) the yearly increase in the quota. Customs duties on originating goods resulting from the application of the Peruvian Price Band System, which may be covered by these categories of products, are excluded from tariff elimination but shall be reduced as and if provided for in Peru's Schedule. 3.26. Annex 3 to the factual presentation identifies the products subject to TRQ commitments by the Parties. 3.2 Rules of origin 3.27. The rules of origin applicable in the context of the Agreement are set out in Annex II to the Agreement (concerning the definition of the concept of "originating products" and methods for administrative cooperation). While definitions are provided for in section 1 of Annex II, the concept of "originating products" is defined in section 2. According to Article 2 of Annex II, a good is considered as originating when: a. it is wholly obtained in the EU, in Colombia or Peru; or 20 Contained in Section A of Appendix 1 of Annex I to the Agreement. 21 Out of a total of 31 different tariff elimination / reduction categories. 22 Aggregate for each category in general. 23 Contained in Section B of Appendix 1 of Annex I to the Agreement. 24 Out of a total of 21 different tariff elimination / reduction categories. 25 Out of a total of 26 different tariff elimination / reduction categories. 26 Contained in Section D of Appendix 1 of Annex I to the Agreement. 27 Out of a total of 25 different tariff elimination / reduction categories.