A Review of Our Legacy System, History of Neglect, Current Issues, and the Path Forward for Levee Safety

Similar documents
Risk Assessment Framework. Levee Ready Columbia

SUBJECT: EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT FOR JANUARY 19, 2017 WATER INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE NATION (WIIN) ACT

Living with levees: using tolerable risk guidelines in California

Abstract. An assessment of the benefits of DWR s levee inspection program in California s Central Valley

Levee Safety The Middle Age Of Levee Safety Development

UPDATE ON DALLAS FLOODWAY

U.S. Army Corp of Engineers

USACE Levee Screening Tool Understanding the Classification

Presented by: Connie Perkins, PE, CFM April 20, 2016

Frequently Asked Questions Oxbow / Hickson / Bakke Ring Levee Option

Moving Policy and Practice from Flood and Coastal Storm Damage Reduction to Risk Management

LEVEE PORTFOLIO REPORT

DAEN SUBJECT: Lower San Joaquin River Feasibility Study Report, California

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTION ABOUT FLOODPLAINS Michigan Department of Environmental Quality

Riverine Flooding - Cedar Rapids, Iowa 2008

Fighting the Flood: Current Political, Regulatory and Financial Challenges

Joint Recommendations on Levee Policy. Association of State Floodplain Managers. National Association of Flood and Stormwater Management Agencies

Minimum Standards For USACE Evaluation of Levee Systems For the National Flood Insurance Program

Situation: the need for non-structural flood risk reduction measures

Requirements for Mapping Levees Complying with Section of the NFIP Regulations

SWIF TO THE RESCUE. Patty Robinson Ike Pace, PE WATER NATURAL RESOURCES ENVIRONMENT INFRASTRUCTURE ENERGY

Development Fee Program: Comparative risk analysis

ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION BULLETIN

RESOLUTION - APPROVING FINAL FISCAL YEAR BUDGET

SUBJECT: LAND USE PLANNING POLICY WITHIN THE 100 YEAR FLOODPLAIN (REPORT #2)

Presentation Overview

SACOG Board of Directors

National Flood Policy Challenges Levees: The Double-edged Sword

Attachment B. King County Flood Control Zone District Work Program

Frequently Asked Questions

Urban Level of Protection Adequate Progress Report

City of Santa Clarita Engineering Services Division Valencia Boulevard Santa Clarita, CA (661) Levee Certification

Justification for Floodplain Regulatory Standards in Illinois

King County Flood Control District Flood Risk Reduction Work Program and Accomplishments

Urban Level of Protection 2017 Annual Adequate Progress Report Update

Analysis and Mapping Procedures for Non-Accredited Levees

Improving Coordinated Flood Preparedness and Response

DES MOINES CITY OF TWO RIVERS. Flooding Risk & Impact to Development

Lower San Joaquin River Feasibility Report

The Need to Address the True Cost of Long-Term Operations, Maintenance, Repair, Rehabilitation, and Replacement (OMRR&R) of the Flood System

Public Information Meeting Rahway River Basin, New Jersey Flood Risk Management Feasibility Study

Action Items for Flood Risk Management on Wildcat Creek Interagency success with floodplain management plans and flood forecast inundation maps

RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board adopt Resolution No approving SAFCA s Fiscal Year Final Budget.

Executive Summary Levee Engineering Assessments September 26, 2014

Testimony of the National Association of Flood And Stormwater Management Agencies. Water Resources Development Act of 2012

USACE Levee Safety Program Update

USACE Silver Jackets, the Missouri State Risk Management Team and State Hazard Mitigation

Levees: PL84-99 and the NFIP

US Army Corps of Engineers Dam Safety

MVD 2012 Flood Season Preparedness

Flood Risk Management and Nonstructural Flood Risk Adaptive Measures

Northwest Flood Fight Workshops

GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT # FLOOD HAZARDS

SITES Project Overview

JANUARY 13, ILL. ADM. CODE CH. I, SEC TITLE 17: CONSERVATION CHAPTER I: DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES SUBCHAPTER h: WATER RESOURCES

CRISP COUNTY, GEORGIA AND INCORPORATED AREAS

FINAL TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM AWD FLOWS THROUGH FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION AREA July 16, 2012

Community Rating System. National Flood Insurance Program

Army Corps of Engineers Indianapolis North Questions and Answers July QUESTION 1: What is the Indianapolis White River North project?

Flood Protection Structure Accreditation Task Force: Final Report

Skagit County Flood Insurance Study Update. Ryan Ike, CFM FEMA Region 10

ASFPM Update and NFIP Reform. KAMM 10 th Anniversary Conference September 9, 2014

University Drive Flood Risk Management Project Phase I 58 th Ave S to 500 S of 64 th Ave S City of Fargo Project FM-15-C1

Passaic River Basin Flood Advisory Commission Report/Status of Recommendations. October 2014 Update

King County Flood Control District 2015 Work Program

DuPage County East Branch DuPage River Resiliency Project. Benefit Cost Analysis

SUBJECT: EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT FOR AUGUST 20, 2015

Chapter 6 - Floodplains

TESTIMONY. Association of State Floodplain Managers, Inc.

Proposed Report 1 DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY CHIEF OF ENGINEERS 2600 ARMY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

APPENDIX E ECONOMICS

TESTIMONY. Association of State Floodplain Managers, Inc. Subcommittee on Transportation and Infrastructure

Floodplain Management 101. Mississippi Emergency Management Agency Floodplain Management Bureau

7. Understand effect of multiple annual exposures e.g., 30-yr period and multiple independent locations yr event over 30 years 3%

National Flood Risk Management Program

Hurricane Katrina 10 th Anniversary Test

1. INTRODUCTION TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Appendix D Rural LMA Work Group Topic Papers

Flood Plain Management Services (FPMS) Program

Memorandum. November 11,2010. Trinity River Corridor Project Committee Members: David

The approach to managing natural hazards in this Plan is to: set out a clear regional framework for natural hazard management

To Whom It May Concern: Terra Yaney Administrative Analyst

Flood: How to Protect Your Business from a Natural Disaster

FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT: A PRESENT AND A 21st CENTURY IMPERATIVE. Gerald E. Galloway, Jr. United States Military Academy

BUTTS COUNTY, GEORGIA AND INCORPORATED AREAS

Risk Based Approaches for Levees in the U.S. and Abroad: Lessons for the NFIP

Section 19: Basin-Wide Mitigation Action Plans

Upper Joachim Creek Public Survey on Potential Flood Risk Reduction

Using GISWeb to Determine Your Property s Flood Zone

Engineers The Sponsor s Guide

DISASTER MANAGEMENT AND ASSISTANCE

DAEN SUBJECT: Little Colorado River at Winslow, Arizona, Flood Risk Management Project

History of Floodplain Management in Ascension Parish

ADVISORY BASE FLOOD ELEVATIONS (ABFEs)

SUBJECT: Flagler County, Florida, Hurricane and Storm Damage Reduction Project

Locally Operated Levees: Issues and Federal Programs

September 8, RE: Application for Planned Unit Development and Special Exemption Permit by Bluff Point Holdings LLC

EXCELLENCE INNOVATION SERVICE VALUE

Meeting the Nation s Levee Challenges

Transcription:

4 th NACGEA GEOTECHNICAL WORKSHOP January 29, 2010 A Review of Our Legacy System, History of Neglect, Current Issues, and the Path Forward for Levee Safety Presented by: Leslie F. Harder, Jr., Phd, PE, GE HDR Engineering, Inc. Presentation Outline What We Have Learned About Our Levees Policies of Neglect Current and Future Risks Current Issues Path Forward

Presentation Outline What We Have Learned About Our Levees Policies of Neglect Current and Future Risks Current Issues Path Forward What We Have Learned About Our Levees Old, Aging Legacy Systems Are Very Different than Dams

What We Have Learned About Our Nation s Levees: Old, Aging Legacy Structures What We Have Learned About Our Nation s Levees: Old, Aging Legacy Structures Levees a long history (1600 s 1920 s)

What We Have Learned About Our Nation s Levees: Old, Aging Legacy Structures Levees a long history (1600 s 1920 s) What We Have Learned About Our Nation s Levees: Old, Aging Legacy Structures

What We Have Learned About Our Nation s Levees: Old, Aging Legacy Structures What We Have Learned About Our Nation s Levees: Old, Aging Legacy Structures Placement of Hydraulic Fill for Natomas Levee

What We Have Learned About Our Nation s Levees: Old, Aging Legacy Structures What We Have Learned About Our Nation s Levees: Old, Aging Legacy Structures Natomas Sacramento River East Levee February 1986

What We Have Learned About Our Nation s Levees: Old, Aging Legacy Structures 1928 Flood Control Act Established Federal Interest in Flood Control Structures Authorized Flood Control Projects on Mississippi River Drainage Basin and Sacramento River Other Flood Control Acts and projects to follow Levees Initiation of U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Flood Control Projects (1920 s 1960 s) What We Have Learned About Our Nation s Levees: Old, Aging Legacy Structures

What We Have Learned About Our Nation s Levees: Old, Aging Legacy Structures What We Have Learned About Our Nation s Levees: Old, Aging Legacy Structures It is commonly acknowledged: Levees Are Designed to Fail Levees are built of soil and only so high - there will eventually be a large enough flood to overtop them when that happens, they commonly fail

What We Have Learned About Our Nation s Levees: Old, Aging Legacy Structures Levees Have Many Flaws and do not need to Overtop To Fail What We Have Learned About Our Nation s Levees: Old, Aging Legacy Structures Levees Need Flood-Fights to Prop Them Up To Prevent Failure Even in Moderate Flood Stages

What We Have Learned About Our Nation s Levees: Old, Aging Legacy Structures California s State Engineer, William Hammond Hall, reportedly stated: There are two kinds of levees, those that have failed and those that will fail. What We Have Learned About Our Levees Old, Aging Legacy Systems Are Very Different than Dams

What We Have Learned About Our Levees Old, Aging Legacy Systems Are Very Different than Dams Levees are simpler structures, but their extent and the policies associated with them are much larger and more complex What We Have Learned About Our Nation s Levees: Levees Are Different Than Dams Differences Between Levees and Dams Include: Ownership Purpose and Benefits Imposition of Flood Risk Structural River Footprint Height Duration of Water Retention Age Siting Design Criteria Foundation Characterization Structural Composition Environmental Impacts Performance Instrumentation Regulatory Measures to Reduce Risk Improvements and Transfer of Risk Space for Structural Upgrades Performance Expectations

What We Have Learned About Our Nation s Levees: Levees Are Different Than Dams Design Criteria, Structural Composition =/ Most levees are legacy systems - up to 150 years old Majority of Dams constructed since 1950 s with modern methods What We Have Learned About Our Nation s Levees: Levees Are Different Than Dams Duration of Water Retention =/ =/ Levees are only part-time workers retain water for only limited periods (e.g. weeks) during flood events Dams commonly store water year round

What We Have Learned About Our Nation s Levees: Levees Are Different Than Dams Duration of Water Retention What We Have Learned About Our Nation s Levees: Levees Are Different Than Dams Regulatory Measures to Reduce Risk =/ Cannot restrict river systems no real regulation of levees - limited abilities to restrict future development Restrict reservoir if dam does not meet high standards of safety

What We Have Learned About Our Nation s Levees: Levees Are Different Than Dams Levee Improvements and Transfer of Risk What We Have Learned About Our Nation s Levees: Levees Are Different Than Dams Levee Improvements and Transfer of Risk Planned Levee Raise

What We Have Learned About Our Nation s Levees: Levees Are Different Than Dams Levee Improvements and Transfer of Risk Planned Levee Raise Presentation Outline What We Have Learned About Our Levees Policies of Neglect Current and Future Risks Current Issues Path Forward

Policies of Neglect As population has increased, men have not only failed to devise means for suppressing or for escaping this evil of floods, but have a singular short-sightedness, rushed into its chosen paths. William John McGee, The Floodplains of Rivers, 1891 Floods are acts of God, but flood losses are largely acts of man. Gilbert F. White, 1945 Policies of Neglect For some: the Pre-Katrina attitude to Flood Management

Policies of Neglect Levees Just Don t Any Respect! Policies of Neglect Levees Just Don t Any Respect! Bradford Island Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta August 29, 2009

Policies of Neglect Not Treating Levees As Systems Policies of Neglect Not Treating Levees As Systems

Policies of Neglect Unintended Consequences (1960 s present) 1968 Establishment of FEMA National Flood Insurance Program and selection of 100-year Flood Protection for Preferred Insurance Rates/ Development Limitations 1986 Water Resources Development Act Establishing Nonfederal Cost Sharing for Federal Flood Control Projects Lack of Understanding about Flood Risks Led Communities and Public Agencies to Only Seek Up to 100-year Flood Protection Policies of Neglect

Policies of Neglect Continuing Development in Deep Floodplains Policies of Neglect West Sacremento Flood Insurance Policies Residential Structures Another Disconnect: Personal Responsibility 10,000 9,000 8,000 7,000 6,000 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 0 8,904 Number of structures in Inundated Area 747 Number covered by flood insurance

Policies of Neglect Policies of Neglect Increasing Flood Damages Source: NOAA Hydrologic Information Center, Flood Losses http://www.nws.noaa.gov/oh/hic/flood_stats/flood_loss_time_series.htm

Policies of Neglect Complacency (Recent past to the present) Unheeded Wake-Up Calls 1993 Midwest Floods 1997 California Central Valley Missouri River, 1993 Policies of Neglect Complacency (Recent past to the present) Wake-Up Call We Couldn t Ignore - Katrina

Policies of Neglect Greater Legal Liabilities: Policies of Neglect Current Situation Levees are Integral to Communities: Critical for the Protection of People, Property, and other Infrastructure An unknown number of levees: ~14,000 Miles of Federal Levees Probably >100,000 miles of Non-Federal Levees Unknown Integrity No National Standards, Approaches Risk: A Dynamic that We Can Keep Up With?

Presentation Outline What We Have Learned About Our Levees Policies of Neglect Current and Future Risks Current Issues Workshop Current and Future Risks

Current and Future Risks LEVEES????? Current and Future Risks LEVEES????? U.S. Dams

Current and Future Risks Increasing Justification for Action U.S. Dams Current and Future Risks Increasing Justification for Action U.S. Dams Decreasing Justification for Action

Current and Future Risks New Orleans, Pre-Katrina U.S. Dams Current and Future Risks New Orleans, Pre-Katrina U.S. Dams

Current and Future Risks Improved Flood Walls at NOLA Industrial Canal Wave/Water Loading During Hurricane Gustav Current and Future Risks Wave/Water Overtopping During Hurricane Gustav - 2008

Current and Future Risks 2005 2008 Current and Future Risks New Orleans, Pre-Katrina 2008 U.S. Dams

Current and Future Risks New Orleans, Pre-Katrina U.S. Dams 2008 100-yr Protection in 2011-2012 Current and Future Risks The broad problem of flood-loss reduction is that the rate at which flood losses are being eliminated by construction of engineering or land-treatment works is of about the same magnitude as the rate at which new property is being subjected to damage. Gilbert F. White, 1960

Current and Future Risks Managing Flood Risk Flood Risk = Probability of x Consequences Flooding of Flooding Current and Future Risks Managing Flood Risk Flood Risk = Probability of x Consequences Flooding of Flooding

Current and Future Risks Managing Flood Risk Flood Risk = Probability of x Consequences Flooding of Flooding Current and Future Risks Managing Flood Risk Flood Risk = Probability of x Consequences Flooding of Flooding

Current and Future Risks Managing Flood Risk Flood Risk = Probability of x Consequences Flooding of Flooding Current and Future Risks Managing Flood Risk Flood Risk = Probability of x Consequences Flooding of Flooding

Current and Future Risks Sacramento River Basin 200 Year Floodplain DAU Population Growth (2000-2030) Red Bluff 27 19 37 38 Chico 19 0 140 2 11 0 31 20 Percent Growth 100 % + 80-99 % 60-79 % 40-59 % 20-39 % 0-19 % N 73 72 Colus a 25 Ma rysvill e 61Yuba City 33 31 153 176 39 59 265 57 1 79 Sacramento 93 Current and Future Risks Our Current Future Flood Risks Larger Floods (Climate Change) Aging Levees More People Behind Levees Time

Flood Risk Current and Future Risks Critical Levee Repairs Levee Evaluations State/Local Early Implementation Projects Federal Projects Central Valley Flood Protection Plan f Mitigation Banking Flood Corridor Easements Designated Floodways Reservoir Reoperation and Forecast Based Operations Climate Change Adjustments to Flood Hydrology Floodplain Mapping Flood Risk Notifications New Building Standards Emergency Response Plans Emergency Supplies and Stockpiles Improved Inspection Procedures and Reporting Local Agency Reports on Maintenance Local Land Use Agency Formal Risk Acknowledgement Shared Liability between State and Local Agencies Development Restrictions for Urban Areas without 200-year Protection Central Valley Flood Protection Board Review of General Plan Amendments Time / Investment Taking Steps to Reduce Flood Risk from FloodSAFE California RESIDUAL RISK Current and Future Risks Our Current Future Flood Risks Time

Current and Future Risks Flood Risks Time Current and Future Risks Flood Risks Time

Current and Future Risks Flood Risks Time Presentation Outline What We Have Learned About Our Levees Policies of Neglect Current and Future Risks Current Issues Path Forward

Current Issues Levee Vegetation Animal Burrows Climate Change Current Issues - Levee Vegetation from ETL 1110-2-571, USACE, April 10, 2009

Current Issues - Levee Vegetation Concerns with Vegetation: Obscures view Impedes maintenance Tree blowover Piping along tree roots Impedes channel capacity Promotes local scour Current Issues - Levee Vegetation Concerns with Vegetation: May also impeded flood-fighting

Current Issues - Levee Vegetation Concerns with Vegetation: May also impede flood-fighting BUT Current Issues - Levee Vegetation Levee systems also commonly share same space as water conveyance, critical habitat, and urban esthetics and recreation

Current Issues - Levee Vegetation For many Levee systems, trees on the waterside slope and bank may provide critical shaded riparian habitat for endangered fisheries Current Issues - Levee Vegetation For many Levee systems, trees may also provide critical erosion protection on the waterside slope

Current Issues - Levee Vegetation Bank Erosion Repairs ~ $6,000 per foot Current Issues - Levee Vegetation Bank Erosion 1870/73

Current Issues - Levee Vegetation Bank Erosion 1870/73 1879 Current Issues - Levee Vegetation Bank Erosion ~900 feet 1870/73 1879 ~1500 feet

Current Issues Levee Vegetation Animal Burrows Climate Change Current Issues - Animal Burrows Animal burrows in levees are more and more being recognized as a very serious threat to the integrity of the levee

Current Issues - Animal Burrows June 2008 Failure of the Pin Oak Levee, MO attributed to muskrat burrowing Current Issues - Animal Burrows February 2008 Failure of the Truckee Canal Embankment, NV attributed to muskrat burrowing

Current Issues Levee Vegetation Animal Burrows Climate Change Current Issues - Climate Change Changing Hydrology From: Roos, 2003 Folsom Dam completed

Current Issues - Climate Change Changing Hydrology From: Roos, 2003 Folsom Dam completed Current Issues - Climate Change Sea Level Rise 2 ft. 1 ft. Source: IPCC, 2001

Current Issues - Climate Change Engineer Circular EC 1165-2-211 (USACE, July 1, 2009): Incorporating Sea-Level Change Considerations in Civil Works Programs Requires Incorporating Future Sea-level Change Projections into Planning, Engineering Design, Construction, and Operating Projects Requires Consideration of a Range of Projections Requires Determination of Sensitivity of Alternatives to Sea-Level Change Projections, and Consideration of Mitigation Measures Current Issues - Climate Change DRMS Phase 2 Preliminary Estimate of Risk Mitigation Measures to Address Future Sea Level Rise and Island Subsidence April 2007 DRMS and September 2007 CALFED ISB Recommendations for Sea Level Rise: Assume ~90 cm by 2100 Consider at least up to ~140 cm by 2100 Berm to maintain stability/seepage Raise levee to maintain freeboard Sea level rise of 90 cm Existing water level Subsidence Existing levee Costs to Maintain Current Level of Performance for 90 cm SLR over the next 100 years (to ~2100) Per mile cost Total Cost for 500 miles upgrade On Island fill ~ $ 9 million ~$ 4.4 Billion Imported fill ~ $ 24 million ~$ 11.8 Billion

It s Always Darkest Just Before it goes Pitch Black Presentation Outline What We Have Learned About Our Levees Policies of Neglect Current and Future Risks Current Issues Path Forward

Current Issues - WRDA 2007 Title IX - National Levee Safety Act National Levee Safety Act WRDA Title IX Section 9000 Section 9003: Levee Safety Committee Section 9004: Inventory, Inspection, Database and Assessment Current Issues - National Committee on Levee Safety

Thank You