JORDAN. SWTS country brief. December Main findings of the ILO SWTS

Similar documents
LEBANON. SWTS country brief. December Main findings of the ILO SWTS

REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA. SWTS country brief. December Main findings of the ILO SWTS

MONTENEGRO. SWTS country brief. December Main findings of the ILO SWTS

SERBIA. SWTS country brief. December Main findings of the ILO SWTS

MALAWI. SWTS country brief October Main findings of the ILO SWTS

ZAMBIA. SWTS country brief January Main findings of the ILO SWTS

Global Employment Trends for Youth 2013 A generation at risk. Employment Trends Unit International Labour Organization Geneva, Switzerland

RESULTS OF THE KOSOVO 2015 LABOUR FORCE SURVEY JUNE Public Disclosure Authorized. Public Disclosure Authorized. Public Disclosure Authorized

newstats 2016 NWT Annual Labour Force Activity NWT Bureau of Statistics Overview

Preliminary Report of the Labour Force Survey 2014

Labour market transitions of young women and men in the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia

MAIN LABOUR FORCE SURVEY RESULTS FOR THE THIRD QUARTER OF 2018

MAIN LABOUR FORCE SURVEY RESULTS FOR THE FIRST QUARTER OF 2017

MAIN LABOUR FORCE SURVEY RESULTS FOR THE FOURTH QUARTER OF 2013

October 2016 Aboriginal Population Off-Reserve Package

August 2015 Aboriginal Population Off-Reserve Package

April 2017 Alberta Indigenous People Living Off-Reserve Package

November 2017 Alberta Indigenous People Living Off-Reserve Package

December 2017 Alberta Indigenous People Living Off-Reserve Package

January 2018 Alberta Indigenous People Living Off-Reserve Package

Labour market transitions of young women and men in the Occupied Palestinian Territory

MAIN LABOUR FORCE SURVEY RESULTS FOR THE FOURTH QUARTER OF 2014

Labour market transitions of young women and men in Ukraine

PRESS RELEASE. LABOUR FORCE SURVEY: 3d quarter 2018

PRESS RELEASE. LABOUR FORCE SURVEY: 3rd quarter 2017

PRESS RELEASE. LABOUR FORCE SURVEY: 1st quarter 2018

GLOBAL EMPLOYMENT TRENDS FOR YOUTH 2013

2017 Alberta Labour Force Profiles Youth

PSA-CAR SPECIAL RELEASE

PRESS RELEASE. LABOUR FORCE SURVEY: 2nd quarter 2018

Labour force, Employment and Unemployment Year 2017

Alberta Labour Force Profiles

Unemployment rate estimated at 13.7%

SEPFOPE International Labour Organization. Timor-Leste. Labour Force Surveys and Main Trends Based on Harmonized Data

Highlights. For the purpose of this profile, the population is defined as women 15+ years.

1. ECONOMIC ACTIVITY

Monitoring the Performance of the South African Labour Market

4 Scottish labour market

Monitoring the Performance of the South African Labour Market

Labor Force Participation Rate in Tokyo Has Been Tending to Increase in Recent Years. Labor Force Status Varies by Sex and Age

2016 Alberta Labour Force Profiles Women

Executive summary WORLD EMPLOYMENT SOCIAL OUTLOOK

4 Scottish labour market

Labour Market Challenges: Turkey

ALBERTA LABOUR FORCE PROFILES Aboriginal People in the Labour Force Alberta Labour Force Profiles

The Kangaroo Island (DC) Region. Workforce Wizard Region Report

Visit our Publications and Open Data Catalogue to find our complete inventory of our freely available information products.

LABOUR FORCE SURVEY 2017 MAIN RESULTS

REPUBLIC OF ZAMBIA CENTRAL STATISTICAL OFFICE PRELIMINARY RESULTS OF THE 2012 LABOUR FORCE SURVEY

2017 Annual Alberta Labour Market Review

GLOBAL EMPLOYMENT TRENDS FOR YOUTH 2013

Monitoring the Performance of the South African Labour Market

Monitoring the Performance of the South African Labour Market

The Fleurieu & Kangaroo Island (State Govt) Region. Workforce Wizard Region Report

ROTHESAY PROFILE May 2014

Average persons in household. Top three industries Post-secondary education (25 64 years) 7.1% Unemployment rate

ALBERTA PROFILE: YOUTH

Scenic Rim Regional Council Community Sustainability Indicators 2009

2000 HOUSING AND POPULATION CENSUS

Labour Force Survey Central Statistics Organisation Islamic Republic of Afghanistan, Kabul October 2012

Monitoring the Performance of the South African Labour Market

SOUTH DAKOTA KIDS COUNT BEACOM SCHOOL OF BUSINESS UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH DAKOTA 414 E. CLARK STREET VERMILLION, SD

There were 2,275 employing organisations in Guernsey in March 2015, which is two fewer than in March 2014.

2012 Annual Alberta Labour Market Review

Ashford Economic Profile 2017 Summary. 1.1: Comparative Qualification Levels with the South East and GB

Oman. Country coverage and the methodology of the Statistical Annex of the 2015 HDR

Yukon Bureau of Statistics

Highlands and Islands Enterprise. Location Profile Keith December 2011

KEY FINDINGS ON THE 2012 URBAN EMPLOYMENT UNEMPLOYMENT SURVEY

United Kingdom (Level) All People 1,870,800 66,040,200 Males 920,200 32,581,800 Females 950,600 33,458,400

The Limestone Coast (State Govt) Region. Workforce Wizard Region Report

United Kingdom (Level) All People 8,825,000 66,040,200 Males 4,398,800 32,581,800 Females 4,426,200 33,458,400

Great Britain (Numbers) All People 85,100 5,810,800 63,785,900 Males 42,300 2,878,100 31,462,500 Females 42,800 2,932,600 32,323,500

Great Britain (Numbers) All People 127,500 5,517,000 63,785,900 Males 63,200 2,712,300 31,462,500 Females 64,400 2,804,600 32,323,500

Contributing family workers and poverty. Shebo Nalishebo

All People 532,500 5,425,400 63,785,900 Males 262,500 2,678,200 31,462,500 Females 270,100 2,747,200 32,323,500. Bradford (Numbers)

Great Britain (Numbers) All People 386,100 8,787,900 63,785,900 Males 190,800 4,379,300 31,462,500 Females 195,200 4,408,600 32,323,500

Brighton And Hove (Numbers) All People 287,200 9,030,300 63,785,900 Males 144,300 4,449,200 31,462,500 Females 142,900 4,581,100 32,323,500

Great Britain (Numbers) All People 7,700 8,825,000 64,169,400 Males 4,200 4,398,800 31,661,600 Females 3,500 4,426,200 32,507,800

Contents. Measuring Decent Work: Framework and overview of selected indicators

North West Leicestershire (Numbers) All People 98,600 4,724,400 63,785,900 Males 48,900 2,335,000 31,462,500 Females 49,800 2,389,400 32,323,500

Great Britain (Numbers) All People 283,500 7,224,000 63,785,900 Males 140,400 3,563,200 31,462,500 Females 143,100 3,660,800 32,323,500

Great Britain (Numbers) All People 64,000 6,168,400 64,169,400 Males 31,500 3,040,300 31,661,600 Females 32,500 3,128,100 32,507,800

Great Britain (Numbers) All People 186,600 6,130,500 63,785,900 Males 92,600 3,021,700 31,462,500 Females 94,000 3,108,900 32,323,500

Great Britain (Numbers) All People 49,600 5,559,300 64,169,400 Males 24,000 2,734,200 31,661,600 Females 25,700 2,825,100 32,507,800

Great Britain (Numbers) All People 267,500 9,080,800 64,169,400 Males 132,500 4,474,400 31,661,600 Females 135,000 4,606,400 32,507,800

Great Britain (Numbers) All People 325,300 4,724,400 63,785,900 Males 164,500 2,335,000 31,462,500 Females 160,800 2,389,400 32,323,500

All People 263,400 5,450,100 64,169,400 Males 129,400 2,690,500 31,661,600 Females 134,000 2,759,600 32,507,800. Rotherham (Numbers)

Great Britain (Numbers) All People 140,700 9,026,300 63,785,900 Males 68,100 4,447,200 31,462,500 Females 72,600 4,579,100 32,323,500

All People 280,000 6,168,400 64,169,400 Males 138,200 3,040,300 31,661,600 Females 141,800 3,128,100 32,507,800. Central Bedfordshire (Numbers)

Great Britain (Numbers) All People 176,200 6,168,400 64,169,400 Males 87,200 3,040,300 31,661,600 Females 89,000 3,128,100 32,507,800

All People 437,100 5,450,100 64,169,400 Males 216,700 2,690,500 31,661,600 Females 220,500 2,759,600 32,507,800. Kirklees (Numbers)

Great Britain (Numbers) All People 348,000 8,825,000 64,169,400 Males 184,000 4,398,800 31,661,600 Females 164,000 4,426,200 32,507,800

All People 130,700 3,125,200 64,169,400 Males 63,500 1,540,200 31,661,600 Females 67,200 1,585,000 32,507,800. Vale Of Glamorgan (Numbers)

Stockton-On- Tees (Numbers) All People 196,500 2,644,700 64,169,400 Males 96,800 1,297,900 31,661,600 Females 99,700 1,346,800 32,507,800

All People 295,800 2,644,700 64,169,400 Males 149,400 1,297,900 31,661,600 Females 146,400 1,346,800 32,507,800. Newcastle Upon Tyne (Numbers)

ALBERTA PROFILE: YOUTH IN THE LABOUR FORCE

Great Britain (Numbers) All People 138,500 6,168,400 64,169,400 Males 69,400 3,040,300 31,661,600 Females 69,000 3,128,100 32,507,800

Transcription:

JORDAN SWTS country brief December 2016 The ILO Work4Youth project worked with the Department of Statistics of Jordan to implement two rounds of the School-to-work transition survey (SWTS) in 2012 13 (December January) and 2015 (March April). The results of the first survey were published in V. Barcucci and N. Mryyan (2014): Labour market transitions of young women and men in Jordan, Work4Youth Publication Series No. 14 (Geneva, ILO) and were also highlighted in the regional synthesis report, R. Dimova, S. Elder and K. Stephan (2016): Labour market transitions of young women and men in the Middle East and North Africa, Work4Youth Publication Series No. 44 (Geneva, ILO). The objective of this country note is to offer a general summary of youth labour market trends in Jordan based on the SWTS. Youth is defined as 15 29. Main findings of the ILO SWTS Human capital and mismatch Almost all surveyed youth had attended school or a training programme at some point in their lives (only 0.6 per cent of youth had never attended school as of 2015). Less than one-third (27.6 per cent) of the youth population had completed their education in 2015 while 42.1 per cent was still attending school. Young women in Jordan have equal opportunities to young men in terms of access to education. SWTS results show a correlation between the levels of education and a young person s labour market transition: a young person with university education was able to complete the transition from school to a first stable/satisfactory job in 10.8 months, while 15.6 months, on average, were need for youth with secondary education. Although most youth in Jordan are able to stay in school at least to the primary level, it is not enough to ensure that a majority of employed youth are adequately educated for the job they are doing. Less than one-half (45.9 per cent) of young workers in 2015 had a level of education that matched what would be expected for their occupation. A higher share (48.7 per cent) were classified as undereducated for the job and only 5.4 per cent of working youth were deemed overeducated for their occupations. The majority (62.2 per cent) of current students in Jordan had a preference for future work in the government/public sector. While the attraction of public sector employment is understandable given concerns with job security, the ability of the sector to absorb a significant number of young workers is limited. The ILO School-to-work transitions surveys (SWTS) are implemented as an outcome of the Work4Youth (W4Y) project, a partnership between the ILO and The MasterCard Foundation. The project has a budget of US$14.6 million and will run for five years to mid-2016. Its aim is to promote decent work opportunities for young men and women through knowledge and action. The immediate objective of the partnership is to produce more and better labour market information specific to youth in developing countries, focusing in particular on transition paths to the labour market. See the website www.ilo.org/w4y for more information.

Underutilization of the youth labour potential remains a top concern The youth labour underutilization rate in Jordan was comparatively low at 34 per cent in 2015, a slight increase from the 2012 value of 32.9 per cent. The share of underutilized labour potential consisted of 2.6 per cent of the youth population in irregular employment (either in self-employment or paid employment with contract of less than 12 months), 15.5 per cent unemployed and 15.9 per cent inactive non-students. The youth unemployment rate increased between 2012 and 2015 from 24.1 to 25.5 per cent but remained below the regional average (Arab States) of 30.6 per cent in the latter year. 1 The unemployment rate of young women was more than double that of young men (46.4 per cent compared to 18.2 per cent for males in 2015). The unemployment rate of youth increased with the level of educational attainment. The rate of university graduates was the highest at 27.8 per cent unemployed in 2015 compared to 20.2 per cent for youth who finished secondary (general) education. The duration of unemployment is often long. More than one-half (58.3 per cent) of unemployed youth had been looking for work for longer than one year in 2015. The share of youth neither in employment nor in education or training (NEETs) in Jordan decreased slightly between 2012 and 2015 from 29 to 28.7 per cent. The share among young women was almost triple that of young men in 2015 at 43.8 and 14.5 per cent, respectively), and is explained primarily by the obligation of many young women to remain outside of the labour force to tend to family responsibilities. Low employment rates for youth, especially young women, remain a strong hindrance to the country s productive transformation Just under one-third (31.2 per cent) of youth in Jordan were employed, a slight increase from 29.9 per cent in 2012. Young men were almost four times more likely to work than young women (employment ratios in 2015 were 49.3 and 11.9 per cent, respectively). The vast majority of young workers were in paid employment (92.7 per cent), and only a small share remained in vulnerable employment as own-account workers (2.8 per cent) or unpaid family workers (1.5 per cent). In 2015, slightly more than one-third (35.7 per cent) of youth in paid employment were engaged without a written contract. The services sector absorbed the largest portion of Jordan s young workers (81.1 per cent of young male workers and 86.8 per cent of young female workers), followed by industry (17.1 and 9.3 per cent, respectively) and agriculture (1.9 and 3.9 per cent, respectively). Informal employment affected almost one-half of young workers in Jordan; the informal employment rate increased slightly between the two years (46.8 to 47.9 per cent, respectively). Selection of data tables Table 1. Youth population by educational status, 2012 and 2015 (%) Educational status Never attended school 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.3 0.6 Dropped out before graduation or completion of school 26.8 29.8 29.9 34.1 23.5 25.2 Currently attending school 42.9 42.1 40.7 39.6 45.2 44.7 Education completed 29.8 27.6 28.8 25.7 30.9 29.5 1 ILO, World Employment and Social Outlook: Trends for Youth 2016 (Geneva). Note, the regional figure covers youth aged 15 24 while the data on the SWTS refer to youth aged 15 29. The youth unemployment rate in Jordan for the age range 15 24 was very close to the regional average at 30.1 per cent in 2015 based on the SWTS.

Table 2. Key youth labour market indicators traditional distribution, 2012 and 2015 (%) Employed 29.9 31.2 47.2 49.3 11.2 11.9 Unemployed (strict definition) 9.5 10.7 10.8 11.0 8.1 10.3 Inactive 60.6 58.2 42.0 39.7 80.7 77.8 Youth labour force participation rate 39.4 41.8 58.0 60.3 19.3 22.2 Youth unemployment rate (strict definition) 24.1 25.5 18.7 18.2 41.8 46.4 Note: The strict definition of unemployment refers to persons without work, available to work and actively engaged in a job search. The broad definition excludes the job search criteria. The youth unemployment rate is the number of unemployed persons divided by the youth labour force (employed plus unemployed). Table 3. Key youth labour market indicators alternative distribution, 2012 and 2015 (%) In regular employment 27.2 28.5 43.0 45.8 10.1 10.1 In irregular employment 2.7 2.6 4.2 3.4 1.1 1.8 Unemployed (broad definition) 12.8 15.5 13.4 13.8 12.2 17.3 Inactive students 39.9 37.5 36.4 33.1 43.7 42.1 Inactive non-students 17.3 15.9 3.0 3.9 32.8 28.6 Youth labour force participation rate (broad definition) 42.8 46.7 60.6 63.0 23.5 29.2 Youth unemployment rate (broad definition) 12.8 15.5 13.4 13.8 12.2 17.3 Youth labour underutilization rate 32.9 34.0 20.6 21.1 46.2 47.7 Table 4. Distribution of NEET youth by composition, 2012 and 2015 (%) 2012 2015 Sex of which: of which: NEET Inactive Unemployed NEET Inactive Unemployed rate nonstudentstudentstudentstudents non- rate non- non- Total 29.0 20.0 8.9 28.7 19.3 9.4 Male 14.9 4.9 10.0 14.5 5.0 9.5 Female 44.2 36.5 7.7 43.8 34.5 9.3 Table 5. Employed youth by status in employment, 2012 and 2015 (%) Status in employment Wage and salaried workers (employees) 93.8 92.7 92.8 91.8 98.7 96.9 Employers 1.7 2.5 2.1 3.0 0.0 0.3 Own-account workers 2.8 2.8 3.1 2.9 1.3 2.4 Contributing (unpaid) family workers 1.7 1.5 2.1 1.8 0.0 0.4 Not classified 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0

Table 6. Distribution of youth employment by sector at the 1-digit level, 2012 and 2015 (%) Sector Agriculture 1.6 2.3 1.7 1.9 1.4 3.9 Industry 16.6 15.6 17.2 17.1 14.0 9.3 Services 81.7 82.1 81.1 81.1 84.6 86.8 Agriculture, forestry and fishing 1.6 2.3 1.7 1.9 1.4 3.9 Mining 0.2 0.5 0.3 0.6 0.0 0.0 Manufacturing 9.9 8.6 9.4 8.9 12.5 7.6 Electricity, gas, steam 0.2 0.4 0.3 0.5 0.0 0.0 Water supply 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.5 Construction 6.2 5.6 7.3 6.6 1.5 1.1 Wholesale and retail trade 16.9 16.1 18.7 16.8 8.8 12.9 Transport 4.2 6.1 4.9 6.8 0.9 3.0 Accommodation 3.5 3.6 4.2 4.3 0.6 0.6 Information and communications 1.8 2.4 1.7 2.2 2.0 3.4 Financial activities 1.4 6.5 1.2 6.5 2.5 6.7 Real estate 0.2 0.4 0.2 0.5 0.3 0.0 Professional scientific activities 2.0 4.1 1.8 4.4 3.2 2.6 Administrative and support activities 1.1 1.4 1.0 1.1 1.3 2.8 Public administration 30.8 24.3 35.0 28.0 11.7 7.6 Education 10.1 8.4 4.9 4.3 33.4 26.7 Health and social work 6.3 5.5 4.4 3.0 15.2 16.2 Arts and entertainment 0.3 0.2 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.3 Other services 2.3 2.1 2.3 2.3 2.4 1.2 Private households 0.4 0.7 0.2 0.4 1.6 1.9 Activities of extraterritorial organizations 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.5 0.9 Table 7. Young wage and salaried workers by type of contract, 2012 and 2015 (%) Type of contract Written agreement 66.0 64.3 63.4 61.3 77.0 77.0 Oral agreement 34.0 35.7 36.6 38.7 23.0 23.0 Unlimited duration 85.0 91.8 86.8 94.6 77.1 80.0 Limited duration 15.0 8.2 13.2 5.4 22.9 20.0 Less than 12 months 32.5 48.0 29.8 35.6 39.2 62.0 12 months to less than 36 months 35.2 46.5 31.1 60.0 45.3 31.3 36 months or more 32.2 5.5 39.1 4.4 15.5 6.7 Table 8. Youth informal employment by composition, 2012 and 2015 (%) Youth formal employment rate 53.2 52.1 51.2 54.1 62.0 43.4 Youth informal employment rate 46.8 47.9 48.8 45.9 38.0 56.6 Of which: Informal employment outside the informal sector (share in informal employment) 78.4 76.0 76.5 73.4 89.4 85.4 Employment in the informal sector (share in informal employment) 21.6 24.0 23.5 26.6 10.6 14.6

Table 9. Employed youth by overeducation, undereducation or matching qualifications, 2012 and 2015 (%) Qualifications match Undereducated 44.4 48.7 51.3 55.1 13.0 21.6 Overeducated 6.2 5.4 5.8 4.7 8.1 8.4 Matching qualifications 49.4 45.9 43.0 40.2 78.9 70.0 Table 10. Youth unemployment rates by level of completed educational attainment, 2012 and 2015 (%) Educational attainment Less than primary (including no schooling) 9.4 13.9 9.5 15.9 - - Primary 23.5 22.3 21.5 19.5 41.8 50.0 Secondary vocational 11.4 22.1 9.8 20.5 41.4 33.2 Secondary general 22.7 20.2 17.4 10.9 50.8 48.2 Post-secondary vocational 22.6 27.7 10.9 11.4 39.6 49.3 University and postgraduate studies 29.5 27.8 17.4 14.3 41.9 43.1 Table 11. Unemployed youth by duration of job search, 2012 and 2015 (%) Duration of job search Less than a week 2.1 1.2 2.1 0.4 2.1 2.2 1 week to less than 1 month 5.4 4.2 6.7 3.7 3.5 4.7 1 month to less than 3 months 9.8 12.5 9.6 14.3 10.0 10.5 3 months to less than 6 months 10.4 5.6 11.3 4.8 9.1 6.4 6 months to less than 1 year 16.6 18.2 14.7 19.6 19.3 16.6 More than a year 55.8 58.3 55.4 57.1 56.0 59.6 Table 12. Youth population by stages and subcategories of transition, 2012 and 2015 (%) Stage of transition Total transited 24.1 26.1 37.8 41.5 9.2 9.7 Transited to stable employment 21.6 23.4 33.6 36.8 8.6 9.1 Transited to satisfactory temporary employment 1.5 1.4 2.2 2.1 0.6 0.5 Transited to satisfactory self-employment 1.0 1.4 2.0 2.5 0.0 0.1 In transition 23.7 26.5 25.0 23.9 22.3 29.2 Unemployed (broad definition) 11.6 12.8 11.9 10.6 11.3 15.1 In non-satisfactory temporary employment 3.5 2.5 5.5 3.4 1.2 1.6 In non-satisfactory self-employment 0.6 0.6 1.0 1.0 0.1 0.2 Active students 3.0 4.6 4.4 6.5 1.5 2.6 Inactive non-students with aim to work in the future 5.0 5.9 2.2 2.4 8.0 9.7 Transition not yet started 52.2 47.4 37.2 34.6 68.5 61.1 Inactive students 39.9 37.5 36.4 33.1 43.7 42.1 Inactive non-students with no plans to work in the future 12.4 9.9 0.8 1.5 24.8 18.9 Note: Unless otherwise specified, the categories exclude current students.