THE NEW ERA OF GLOBAL BANK RELATIONSHIP MANAGEMENT

Similar documents
RETHINKING BANKING: FITTING YOUR BUSINESS MODEL TO REGULATORY CONSTRAINTS

Enhanced Disclosure Task Force 2015 Progress Report Appendix 4: Leading Practice Examples of EDTF Recommendations. October 2015

Prof. Dr. Helmut Gründl. Interconnectedness between Banking and Insurance

Resolution of Global Systemically Important Financial Institutions (G-SIFIs) - Overview of International Efforts -

The G20-FSB Post-Crisis Regulatory Reform Agenda: Implications for Hong Kong

AT1 Capital Instruments

Morgan Stanley 1Q17 Fixed Income Investor Update. May 5, 2017

ING Group. The transformation into a liability-driven bank. Morgan Stanley Conference. Koos Timmermans CRO. London 30 March 2011

BNP PARIBAS EUROPEAN LEADER WITH STRONG CAPITAL GENERATION CAPACITY. Fixed Income Roadshow. March 2016

Australian Bankers Association: International comparability of capital ratios of Australia s major banks

Session 6 Financial Regulation: convergence or divergence? Tokio Morita. Financial Services Agency January 22, 2013

Preparing for NSFR. Implementing regulatory change and optimising outcomes. National Australia Bank, 2015

Morgan Stanley 3Q15 Fixed Income Investor Call. November 3, 2015

GLOBAL CAPITAL MARKETS

466 deals $2.1bn $16.3bn

Deutsche Bank Yankee Bank Bond Conference

The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. PILLAR 3 DISCLOSURES

Systemic risk: Applications for investors and policymakers. Will Kinlaw Mark Kritzman David Turkington

Counterparty Credit Default Swap Rates

Counterparty Credit Default Swap Rates

Counterparty Credit Default Swap Rates

Counterparty Credit Default Swap Rates

Morgan Stanley Fixed Income Investor Call. November 3, 2017

The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. PILLAR 3 DISCLOSURES

Counterparty Credit Default Swap Rates

GLOBAL CAPITAL MARKETS LEAGUE TABLES

GLOBAL CAPITAL MARKETS

Most Banks Don't Need More Capital, But The Flexibility To Use It In Times Of Stress

New ISDA Resolution Stay Protocols

Santander: New strategy focused on profitability and growth. José Luis de Mora Global Head of Financial Planning and Corporate of Development

Revised Operational Risk Capital Framework

Capital Plan and Business Operating Plan. Enterprise-wide Stress Testing ICAAP

Bulletin. Decline in profitability since 2005: French banks hold their own. +10% for US banks. +66% for European banks +97% for French banks +10

The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. PILLAR 3 DISCLOSURES

TLAC STRATEGY UPDATE JANUARY 2017 FIXED INCOME INVESTORS PRESENTATION

BlueBay Order Execution Policy

Wells Fargo & Company. Basel III Pillar 3 Regulatory Capital Disclosures

Wells Fargo & Company. Basel III Pillar 3 Regulatory Capital Disclosures

Wells Fargo & Company. Basel III Pillar 3 Regulatory Capital Disclosures

Wells Fargo & Company. Basel III Pillar 3 Regulatory Capital Disclosures

The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. PILLAR 3 DISCLOSURES

Debt in Focus. Hamish Grant

GLOBAL CAPITAL MARKETS

Wells Fargo & Company. Basel III Pillar 3 Regulatory Capital Disclosures

Westpac Capital Notes 5 Investor Presentation

SP Global : Why Another Capital Ratio?

BLOCKCHAIN. Bureaucracy Killer MILOVAN PASINI, CO-FOUNDER NIKOLA JOKIĆ, CO-FOUNDER. kip.investmens

Investment Bank Credit Report Q4 2017

The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. PILLAR 3 DISCLOSURES

Third Quarter Results 2008 BBVA

Liquidity, Capital and Financial Outlook Todd Gibbons Chief Financial Officer

Basel III Pillar 3 Disclosures Report. For the Quarterly Period Ended September 30, 2016

Pictet Asset Management Best Execution Policy

The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. PILLAR 3 DISCLOSURES

PILLAR 3 DISCLOSURES

Due Diligence Support Pack

Fixed Income Investor Presentation. August 4, 2015

Basel III Pillar 3 Disclosures Report. For the Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 2016

Wells Fargo & Company. Basel III Pillar 3 Regulatory Capital Disclosures

Morgan Stanley Municipal Issuer and Investor Conference

Basel III Pillar 3 Disclosures Report. For the Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 2017

PILLAR 3 DISCLOSURES

Despite Challenging Environment

25 / 06 / 2008 APPLICATION OF THE BASEL II REFORM

Supplementary Regulatory Capital Disclosure

Foreign Banks in China 17 July 2012

GLOBAL CAPITAL MARKETS

Announcement: Moody's Reviews Ratings for Banks and Securities Firms with Global Capital Markets Operations

Understanding Financial Interconnectedness

FY 2009 results Capital strengthening. Milan, 18 September 2009

Increasing Shareholder Value

Overview of Goldman Sachs. February 2019

Supplementary Regulatory Capital Disclosure

Structural reform study: Supplementary report 2 Inventory of bank responses to regulatory change

Standardisation of MiFIR Post Trade Transparency and Transaction Reporting for FX Vanilla Options

For financial adviser use only. Not to be used with retail clients. Due Diligence Support Pack

Holdings Report GS Sterling Liquid Reserves Fund

MREL & TLAC A Market Perspective WORLD BANK CONFERENCE, VIENNA 12/13 DECEMBER 2016 FINSAC WORKSHOP ON BAIL-IN AND MREL

SUPPLEMENTARY REGULATORY CAPITAL DISCLOSURE FIRST QUARTER 2018

SUPPLEMENTARY REGULATORY CAPITAL DISCLOSURE FOURTH QUARTER 2015

Holdings Report GS Sterling Liquid Reserves Fund

Quarterly Trends for Consolidated U.S. Banking Organizations Fourth Quarter 2017

Royal Bank of Canada. Pillar 3 Report

INTRODUCTION. This document is not audited and should be read in conjunction with our Q Quarterly Report to Shareholders and 2017 Annual Report.

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. High-level summary of Basel III reforms

SUPPLEMENTARY REGULATORY CAPITAL DISCLOSURE. First Quarter 2015

Supplementary Regulatory Capital Disclosure

9M14 Results. A Winner in the Comprehensive Assessment and in Delivering Growth in Profitability. A Strong Bank, Delivering Growth

Holdings Report GS Euro Liquid Reserves Fund

Fixed Income Investor Presentation. August 2, 2016

Best Execution How we execute client orders. Wealth Management

PILLAR 3 REGULATORY CAPITAL DISCLOSURES

Overview of Goldman Sachs. October 2014

State Street Global Advisors Trust Company State Street Short Term Investment Fund Financial Statements December 31, 2017

Regulatory Disclosures 30 September 2018

Royal Bank of Canada Morgan Stanley U.S. Financials Conference

The Bank of East Asia, Limited 東亞銀行有限公司. Banking Disclosure Statement

2017 Results Business Plan Successfully Delivered. A Strong Bank, Delivering Growth

PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT

Eurozone Exit - ISDA Documentation Considerations ISDA Definitions

Transcription:

THE NEW ERA OF GLOBAL BANK RELATIONSHIP MANAGEMENT James Gilligan, CTP, FP&A Great Plains Energy, Inc. (Kansas City) Stephan Ireland -- Redbridge Debt & Treasury Advisory (Houston)

Every component of the banking relationship can strengthen it or weaken it Banking relationships are complex and subtle HISTORICAL and LONG STANDING relationship HUMAN based relationship Evolved with MUTUAL TRUST and CONFIDENCE Sometimes (often?) POLITICAL ADMINISTRATIVE A CHOSEN or ENDURED relationship ALL of it? But it is ALWAYS a relationship based on performance, risk and profitability KPIs 2

AGENDA 1 2 3 4 5 Regulatory background Bank reactions RAROC & economic capital Taking advantage of the new rules Questions 3

Basel III changed banks forever Capital requirements for banks were substantially increased Common Equity Tier 1 ( CET1 ) Tier 1 Capital Total Capital Common Equity Tier 1 Basel II Minimum Basel III Minimum (Effective Jan 2015) Capital Conservation Buffer (Effective Jan 2019) Total Minimum Ratios Maximum G-SIB Buffer (if applies) Basel III establishes a minimum Common Equity Tier 1 ( CET1 ) ratio Rules require more stringent adjustments to the calculation of CET1 Potential Minimum Ratios for Large Banks 2.0% 4.5% + 2.5% = 7.0% + 2.5% = 9.5% 4.0% 6.0% + 2.5% = 8.5% + 2.5% = 11.0% 6.0% 8.0% + 2.5% = 10.5% + 2.5% = 13.0% Non-Common Regulatory Capital Capital Conservation Buffer Non-cumulative perpetual preferred stock classified as Tier 1 capital Subordinated debt classified as Tier II capital Minority interests receive significantly reduced capital treatment Banks will be required to hold 2.5% of risk-weighted assets (RWA) in Common Equity Tier 1, above the minimum ratios, to satisfy this requirement and avoid restrictions on discretionary capital distributions

G-SIB surcharges Surcharge Bucket G-SIBs (effective Jan 2017) G-SIBs (effective Jan 2018) G-SIBs have even higher capital requirements 3.5% (Empty) (Empty) Systemically important banks are viewed as being 2.5% HSBC JP Morgan Chase Citigroup JP Morgan Chase riskier Global Systemically Important Banks (G-SIBs) are allocated to surcharge buckets corresponding to the higher loss absorbency requirements they would be required to hold Systemic importance is determined by computing a score based on the equal weighting of 5 factors: 2.0% 1.5% Barclays BNP Paribas Citigroup Deutsche Bank Bank of America Credit Suisse Goldman Sachs Mitsubishi UFJ FG Morgan Stanley Bank of America BNP Paribas Deutsche Bank HSBC Barclays Credit Suisse Goldman Sachs Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited Mitsubishi UFJ FG Wells Fargo Cross-jurisdictional activity (Banks with significant global operations) Size (Banks with large balance sheet assets and/or exposure) Interconnectedness (Banks with significant exposure to wholesale funding and counterparty exposure to other financial institutions) Substitutability (Banks with large custody, clearing and/or underwriting operations) Complexity (Banks with significant capital markets exposures and illiquid investments) 1.0% Agricultural Bank of China Bank of China Bank of New York Mellon China Construction Bank Groupe BPCE Groupe Credit Agricole Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited ING Bank Mizuho FG Nordea Royal Bank of Scotland Santander Societe Generale Standard Chartered State Street Sumitomo Mitsui FG UBS Unicredit Group Wells Fargo Agricultural Bank of China Bank of China Bank of New York Mellon China Construction Bank Groupe BPCE Groupe Credit Agricole ING Bank Mizuho FG Morgan Stanley Nordea Royal Bank of Scotland Santander Societe Generale Standard Chartered State Street Sumitomo Mitsui FG UBS Unicredit Group U.S. Banks highlighted in red

Basel III also seeks to limit leverage Basel III pressures RWAs and lending capacities Basel III establishes a minimum 3% Leverage Ratio: 3% Minimum*: Tier 1 Capital / Total Exposure (Effective January 2018) Exposure calculation utilizes Credit Conversion Factors (CCF) to convert undrawn commitments to a measure of exposure United States has more stringent Leverage Ratio Basel III minimum still applies as supplementary 4% U.S. Minimum: Tier 1 Capital / Avg on-balance sheet assets (Currently Effective) * U.S. G-SIBS subject to a 5% minimum CCF 100% 50% 20% Commitment Type Standby Letters of Credit serving as financial guarantees for loans and securities Sale and repurchase agreements and asset sales with recourse Lending of banks securities or the posting of securities as collateral by banks Forward asset purchases, forward deposits and partly-paid shares and securities Commitments with an original maturity > one year Certain transaction-related contingent items (e.g.: performance bonds, bid bonds, warranties) Note issuance facilities (NIFs) and revolving underwriting facilities (RUFs) Commitments with an original maturity up to one year Short-term self liquidating trade letters of credit arising from the movement of goods U.S. rules also have Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR) test High Quality Liquid Assets ( HQLA ) LCR = Total Net Cash Outflows Over the Stress Horizon > 100% (Currently Effective) Applies in full to depository institutions and holding companies with > $250 billion in assets or $10 billion in international exposure Net Cash Outflows defined as the highest daily cumulative net outflow occurring over a 30 day period 10% Commitments that are unconditionally cancellable 6

Basel III effect is passed on by banks to their clients Banks may no longer find your business profitable The Shrinking Bank Portfolio Teepee Possible investment banking portfolios Risk-Based Capital Ratio (%) = Regulatory Capital Risk-Weighted Assets Basel 3: LCR / NSFR Liquidity 7

AGENDA 1 2 3 4 5 Regulatory background Bank reactions RAROC & economic capital Taking advantage of the new rules Questions 8

Banking industry is adapting its business model to the new environment Consequences for corporates can be dramatic BANK REACTIONS CONSEQUENCES FOR CORPORATES Pricing Optimization Re-pricing credit facilities Increasing pricing on side Businesses More Stringent documentation Increase in bank fees Effective Risk Management Effective Customer Management Strategic Cost Reduction Reducing credit exposure & concentration limits Stricter credit approval processes Less flexibility Redefining Core clients list Devoting more or fewer resources to clients at specific levels of size or profitability Rationalization of branch structures Product rationalization Reducing resources (Improving C/I ratios) Targeting the AAAs? Funding Scarcity? Unsustainable funding policy Core Clients Service Quality & Coverage Rethink your bank relationship?

Many factors can explain why your business might not be attractive to a particular bank at a specific time Commercial Banking Investment Banking What makes your business attractive OR NOT to banks? Global Transaction Services Short term lending Trade Finance Cash Management Bank Core capabilities Medium Long term Financing Credit or Liquidity Facilities Leasing & Asset Based Credit Structured & receivable Finance Global Profitability Capital constraints Asset Management Custody (administrative) Short & Long term Investments Client s Attraction Capital Markets & Advisory Debt Capital Market Equities Capital Market M&A / Advisory Risk Profile Liquidity constraints Trading activities Rates / FX Equity Commodities Business Sector 10

Historical averages collected over the last 15 years Study based on 15 companies in the Global Fortune 1000 150 # of Banks per company 400 Bank fees (in $m) 100 104 300 320 50 0 44 13 Average 200 100-78 6 Average 100% 80% Efficiency Ratio (%) 86% 40% RAROC (%) 60% 40% 20% 0% 57% 40% Average 30% 20% 10% 0% Average 30% 14% 5% 11

How many banks do you need? Bank Concentration 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Top 5 Banks vs. Total Revenues A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O Top 5 banks represent 59% of total business 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Top 5 Banks vs. Total Economic Capital C B A F J D I N M H K L E G O Top 5 banks represent 50% of total EC 12

AGENDA 1 2 3 4 5 Regulatory background Bank reactions RAROC & economic capital Taking advantage of the new rules Questions 13

RAROC is a tool used by banks to create and protect value based upon their IRR requirements Risk-adjusted performance measurements encompass multiple sets of concepts Revenues (Credit margin, arrangement fees, side business ) Cost to Income Ratio Refinancing costs Depend on maturity Cost of Risk EAD x LGD x PD Revenues on Economic Capital LCR & NSFR Costs Ex-ante loan loss impairments RAROC = Revenues Operating Costs Economic Capital Liquidity Costs - Expected Loss Unexpected Loss, capital required to absorb losses up to a chosen probability of failure (usually 95% to 99%) EC = Basel III Advanced Approaches Risk Weight (K%) x EAD Function of EAD, PD, LGD & M We can add Operational & Market risk too (not chosen in our methodology) 14

Four major risk parameters are key in assessing Economic Capital and the bank s profitability RAROC: Behind the words are risk parameters Bank Exposures Counterparty Risk Exposure On/Off Balance Sheet (CCF) EAD Exposure at Default: What is the Bank s Actual Exposure a the time of default? Loss LGD Loss Given Default: How much will the Bank actually lose if you default? (Will the bank recover some of it?) PD Probability of default over next year Less: Collateral Maturity M Maturity: What is the duration of the Bank s commitments? Internal Rating 15

Data collected over the last 15 years Have You Heard About The Business Case? Average RAROC per product category Revenue Distribution 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Infinite Asset Advisory and Management Capital Market 41% Trading activities 36% Short Term Financing 20% Global Transaction Banking 6% Long term Financing Credit Side business 54% 46% Revenue Distribution Revenues distribution by BU 13% 26% Recurrent revenues Nonrecurrent revenues Commercial banking 87% 74% Investment banking 16

Analyze the impact of banking services on profitability Understand What Matters 14,0% 13.2% 13.7% Infinite 12,0% 11.2% 3066% 10,0% 8.7% 24.2% 7.7% 8,0% 6.1% 17.5% 32.4% 13,7% 6,0% 4,0% 6,1% 2,0% 0,0% Long term Financing Short Term Financing Trading activities Global Transaction Banking Advisory and Capital Asset Management Market Total 17

RAROC can help corporates more accurately price financial operations and adequately measure side business amounts RAROC RAROC RAROC RAROC And the sensitivity to all risk parameters 30% 35% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 7,41% 25,79% 19,63% 14,50% 10,46% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 28,58% 19,60% 14,50% 11,29% 9,12% 0% BBB- BBB BBB+ A- A 0% 3 4 5 6 7 Rating Initial Maturity (years) 15% 15% 15% 15% 14% 14% 14% 14% 14% 13% 15,02% 14,76% 14,50% 14,25% 13,99% 100 110 120 130 140 Spread (bp) 15,5% 15,0% 14,5% 14,0% 13,5% 13,0% 12,5% 15,02% 14,50% 13,99% 13,47% #N/A 10 bp 20 bp 30 bp 40 bp Cost of Liquidity 18

Banks use Economic Capital & RAROC in different ways to create value for their shareholders RAROC & Economic Capital are strategic tools for banks Defining Risk Budget Depending on existing Capital & RWA, banks can calculate their maximum risk budget (Economic Capital) Allocating Risk Budget Allocation of EC per Business Unit, Desks, Products, Transactions Allocating per Counterparty (PD) Decision Making Used in approval processes (yearly analysis / transaction request) Subject to business judgment Performance Use selectively in pricing Link To EVA: If RAROC > Cost of Capital 19

AGENDA 1 2 3 4 5 Regulatory background Bank reactions RAROC & economic capital Taking advantage of the new rules Questions 20

Transparency is the foundation of a fair and long standing relationship If your bank tells you We are not meeting our rate of return, We need more business!» Ask what is your bank s hurdle rate (RAROC / RoRWA)? Does your bank have a profitability issue, fee issue, or both? Ask for bank fee reporting Always compare with the market and your peers Check how compares to other banks BUT: How and what to accurately compare? Be aware that each business / transaction has its own EBIT structure (Efficiency ratio) ASK your bank for average cost/income ratios Check annual reports (cost to income ratios) Is your bank using an internal rating process? What is your rating? Check what financial ratios your bank uses to assess your company What qualitative information does your bank assess? (Management, Industry, etc.) Sell your credit: organize annual bank meetings and sell your risk profile! Ask your bank to share their Internal rating in return Optimize bank capital by using less greedy economic capital instruments (securitization, factoring, receivables), by implementing a commercial paper program or issuing Private Placements. Cash or receivable collateral reduce significantly RWAs. Make sure you benefit from the reduction in your pricing / margin! Be careful when assessing the amount of liquidity lines. They tend to be the highest cost of capital to the bank. Do you have a liquidity policy? How often do you review it? Typically the longer the maturity, the better for your company (not for your banks)! Longer = expensive! Diversify your liquidity profile by issuing several bilateral credit lines with different maturities instead of a global RCF. You might even have better rates! If you don t ask, you don t get! 21

Rank your banks to decide how to distribute business Measure & quantify revenues, Economic Capital & RAROC Revenues 2013 Revenues 2012 EC 2013 EC 2012 (in M EUR) (in M EUR) (in M EUR) (in M EUR) 2013 RAROC 2012 RAROC BNP Paribas 32,8 26,1 24,8 23,1 39% 33% HSBC 20,1 15,0 12,4 12,6 40% 9% Société Générale 14,3 9,1 16,0 19,5 26% 13% Société Générale 14,2 9,1 16,0 19,5 26% 13% Crédit du nord 0,1 0,0 0,0 0,0 25% - BPCE 12,0 21,3 7,1 10,0 25% 38% Bred 4,2 11,4 0,2 0,5-207% 229% Natixis 7,8 9,9 6,9 9,4 31% 28% Intesa Sanpaolo 11,5 9,7 15,4 19,4 20% 14% Crédit Agricole 10,1 5,7 16,4 14,6 21% 13% RBS 9,7 4,6 8,9 11,8 24% 10% CITI Bank 9,6 2,0 4,2 4,3 62% 12% Morgan Stanley 6,3 9,7 2,5 3,6 63% 58% Barclays 6,0 4,6 9,6 14,0 15% 8% Goldman Sachs 5,8 2,7 3,6 4,4 39% 14% Crédit Suisse 4,9 2,3 3,5 4,1 37% 14% Deutsche Bank 4,7 6,2 4,8 2,8 23% 50% Lloyds 4,7 1,8 4,7 5,9 30% 9% Bank of America 4,0 1,7 7,0 6,7 16% 8% Nomura 3,4 1,5 2,2 2,6 40% 13% Santander 3,1 1,7 6,7 5,7 15% 10% CM-CIC 2,7 2,9 5,1 5,5 21% 20% ING 2,6 1,9 6,7 6,1 14% 10% Unicredit 2,3 2,0 11,1 10,5 6% 6% La Banque Postale 2,1 3,8 2,0 2,6 47% 76% Commerzbank 1,8 1,2 5,4 4,9 11% 9% BoTM 1,4 1,3 7,7 7,6 7% 6% Royal Bank of Canada 1,4 0,2 4,8 2,6 8% 3% Mizuho 1,3 0,2 4,5 4,1 9% 2% SMBC 0,7 0,3 2,3 2,7 10% 3% JP Morgan 0,6 1,4 0,9 1,0 18% 41% Wells Fargo 0,3 0,2 0,0 0,0 Infini Infini ANZ 0,1 0,3 0,1 0,3 15% 17% Nordea 0,1 0,3 0,0 0,0 323% 142% Total 180,5 141,8 200,5 212,6 24,45% 16,70% 22

Identify which banking relationships are profitable Bank Fees are not enough Hurdle rate Opportunistic or Banks in danger You are in danger! 23

AGENDA 1 2 3 4 5 Regulatory background Bank reactions RAROC & economic capital Taking advantage of the new rules Questions 24

THE NEW ERA OF GLOBAL BANK RELATIONSHIP MANAGEMENT Stephan Ireland Managing Director Redbridge Debt & Treasury Advisory Houston, TX 832-321-2754 sireland@redbridgedta.com James Gilligan, CTP, FP&A Assistant Treasurer Great Plains Energy, Inc. Kansas City, MO 816-556-2084 jim.gilligan@kcpl.com