REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL ORGANIZATIONAL REVIEW OF THE VILLAGE OF BURNS LAKE. November 2013

Similar documents
Request for Proposal RFP SUBJECT: EXECUTIVE SEARCH CONSULTANT FOR A VICE PRESIDENT ACADEMIC & PROVOST

Website Re-Design and Development

Request for Proposals Waterworks Operations and Maintenance Contract

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS. RFP Financial Audit Services. ISSUE DATE: July 15, 2013

Request for Proposals # Village of Midway Flood Risk Assessment, Flood Mapping, and Flood Mitigation Plan. Issued February 21, 2018

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL. Information Technology Support Services

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL FOR EXTERNAL AUDIT SERVICES THE CHILDREN S AID SOCIETY OF OTTAWA (CASO)

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL. DeMamiel Creek Pedestrian Crossing

Request for Proposal RFP # SUBJECT: Ergotron LX

Insurance Brokerage Services

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS MOSQUITO CONTROL PROGRAM

TOWN OF MIDLAND ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL

CITY OF PETALUMA REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL for Legal Services for the HIGH PLAINS LIBRARY DISTRICT Greeley, CO

TOWN OF MIDLAND ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL FILE # F Information Technology Strategic Plan

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL FINANCIAL AUDIT SERVICES RETURN TO:

Consulting Services - Cable Television System Franchise Renewal CLOSING LOCATION: EXECUTIVE OFFICE CITY OF LONGVIEW 1525 BROADWAY LONGVIEW, WA 98632

TOWN OF PEMBROKE PARK REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) PROFESSIONAL FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING SERVICES

CASCADE WATER ALLIANCE Request for Qualifications (RFQ)

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL EAP ADMINISTRATION CITY OF OVERLAND PARK

REQUEST FOR TENDER No GENERAL INSURANCE BROKERAGE SERVICES FOR PROPERTY, BOILER & MACHINERY and CRIME

MEMORANDUM Municipal Way, Lansing (Delta Township), Michigan Enclosed for your consideration is MERS Request For Proposal (RFP).

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL FOR PAWTUCKET/CENTRAL FALLS STATION DISTRICT BRAND DEVELOPMENT, COMMUNICATIONS AND MARKETING STRATEGY

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

FORM OF TENDER 12/2017 SUPPLY AND DELIVER VARIOUS CISCO COMPONENTS

Request for Proposals Town of Florence Strategic Plan

COUNTY OF CUMBERLAND, NORTH CAROLINA Request for Proposals Bond Counsel Services RFP# 16-6-FD

City of Terrace. Request for Proposals Pedestrian Overpass Concept Design & Feasibility Study. Issue Date: January 31, 2018

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

REQUESTS FOR PROPOSAL # for INTERNET SERVICE PROVIDER. at SMITHERS REGIONAL AIRPORT

Request for Proposals (RFP)

Fishers Island Ferry District. Request for Proposals. for. Professional Auditing Services

SAMPLE REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS UNDER JAPANESE ODA LOANS

Request for Proposal for IRC 457 (b) Deferred Compensation Plan Services

Request for Risk Management and Insurance Broker Services

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FEASIBILITY STUDY

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL RFP13-08

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS INVESTMENT SERVICES

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

QUOTATION FORM. CLOSING DATE AND TIME: January 24, 2017 at 3:00 P.M.

Botetourt County Public Schools

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL FOR AUDIT SERVICES City of Yreka, California Dated February 08, 2018

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS to Design, Build and Finance the Highway 401 Expansion Project Credit River to Regional Road 25 RFP No (RFP Version 1.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

FRIENDSHIP PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR RFP COMPENSATION DESIGN CONSULTANT SERVICES

Town of Manchester, Connecticut General Services Department. Request for Proposals for Fingerprinting Services 17/18-85.

CITY OF ALAMOSA 300 HUNT AVE ALAMOSA, CO 81101

CITY OF GAINESVILLE REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL

City of Caribou, ME Request for Proposals for Annual Independent Financial Auditing Services

FRIENDSHIP PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR RFP TEMPORARY STAFFING

Three (3) complete copies of each Proposal must be received prior to 3 pm Pacific Time, April 17 th, 2014.

Request for Proposal;

Chatham County Request for Proposals Biannual Customer Service Survey

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

SECTION 115 PENSION TRUST ADMINISTRATION RFP #1828 December 2017

Request for Proposal #2018-UCPR-RPR-001. Operational Review of the Prescott and Russell Residence

The Minnesota Workers Compensation Assigned Risk Plan (MWCARP) Actuarial Services Request For Proposals

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

ORANGE COUNTY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM MEMORANDUM

Request for Qualifications (RFQ) for Legal Services to Mustang Special Utility District Issued April 30, 2015

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL For PROFESSIONAL SERVICES. Water & Stormwater Utility Rate Analyses

Center Township Butler County, Pennsylvania REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS AND QUALIFICATIONS FOR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES

Invitation to Quote ADM Golden Raven Marketing Program Review

SAN DIEGO CONVENTION CENTER CORPORATION

West Hartford Housing Authority Request for Proposals (RFP) HQS Services

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) Montrose County Fairgrounds EVENT CENTER MARKETING Date Issued: Wednesday, October 25 th, 2017

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) Wide Area Network (WAN) Connectivity Services To Multiple District Sites

TOWN OF FARMINGTON REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS INSURANCE / RISK MANAGEMENT SERVICES

COUNTY OF COLE JEFFERSON CITY, MISSOURI

ALABAMA STATE PORT AUTHORITY REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS

The Redevelopment Authority of the City of York. Request for Proposals (RFP) Accounting and Fiscal Management Services

Demolition, Land Clearing and Construction Waste Diversion Study REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS ES-17-14

Strategic Planning Services

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS INSURANCE BROKERAGE SERVICES

Request for Proposal. Municipal Facility Space Needs Assessment City of Burnsville, MN

CITY OF MONTEREY REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS TO PROVIDE ON-CALL REALTOR SERVICES FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING

Request for Proposals. Consultant for Board Governance Framework Design - Arts and Culture Centre

Pension Board Attorney

Union County. Request for Proposals # Employee Survey Services

Cloud Based PBX System and Hardware

STANDARD BIDDING DOCUMENTS UNDER JAPANESE ODA LOANS

REQUEST FOR STANDING OFFERS (RFSO) Graphic Design Services

Request for Proposals Professional Actuarial Services. QUESTIONS AND INTENT TO RESPOND DUE DATE: April 12, 2017, 4:00 p.m. (CDT)

KANSAS PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS. Sewer Revenue Bond Refinancing Bond Refinance Team

Request for Proposal Supply & Install Generators at District Health Centers Project

140 East Town Street Columbus, Ohio John J. Gallagher, Jr., Executive Director. REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL: Health Care Consulting Services

Request for Proposals Drainage Master Plan

Ohio Public Employees Retirement System. Request for Proposal. For: Actuarial Consulting Services. Date: October 21, 2016

Request for Proposal

City of Coolidge 130 W. Central Avenue Coolidge, Arizona (520) TDD: (520) / Fax: (520)

DD Endowment Trust Fund The Arc of Washington State REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) RFP Number: 14-01

RFP # FACILITIES MANAGEMENT SERVICES

PART V PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL FOR THE 5-YEAR UPDATE OF THE OTSEGO COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL MULTI- HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL ANNUAL INDEPENDENT CPA AUDIT RIFLE, COLORADO

City of Beverly Hills Beverly Hills, CA

Transcription:

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL ORGANIZATIONAL REVIEW OF THE VILLAGE OF BURNS LAKE November 2013

Page 2 of 14 SUMMARY OF KEY INFORMATION Request for Proposals to Deliver a Organizational Review for the Village of Burns Lake VILLAGE S REPRESENTATIVE: CAO Sheryl Worthing sworthing@burnslake.ca 250-692-7587 FINAL TIME AND DATE FOR RECEIPT OF PROPOSAL: 10:00 a.m. local time, Friday, January 3 rd, 2013 ADDRESS FOR PROPOSAL SUBMISSIONS: Chief Administrative Officer, Sheryl Worthing Village of Burns Lake Box 570 Burns Lake, B.C. V0J 1E0 Proponents must read the entire RFP document for full details and requirements. THE VILLAGE RESERVES THE RIGHT TO CANCEL THIS RFP AT ANY TIME BEFORE OR AFTER THE CLOSING DATE AND TIME HAS PASSED, AND THE LOWEST PRICED, OR ANY, PROPOSAL WILL NOT NECESSARILY BE CHOSEN FOR NEGOTIATION OF A CONTRACT FOR SERVICES.

Page 3 of 14 Table of Contents Summary of Key Information: Part A: Proposal Details 1. Background 5 1.1 Village of Burns Lake 1.2 Local Government in Burns Lake 2. Scope of Services Required 5 2.1 Range of Services/Practice Areas 2.2 Engagement of Other Firms 3. Required Submission Content 6 3.1 Name and Address of Company 3.2 Overview of Company 3.3 Partners of Firm 3.4 Proposed Contract Administrator / Company Contract 3.5 Associates, Employees, Contractors of Firm 3.6 References 3.7 Fee Structure/Billing Information 3.8 Additional Information PART B ADMINISTRATION 4. Purpose 8 5. General Terms and Conditions 8 5.1 Village Representative 5.2 Proponent Inquiries and RFP Clarification 5.3 Right to Cancel RFP and/or to Accept Proposals 5.4 Confidentiality of Proposals 5.5 No Collusion 5.6 Waiver of Liability for Errors 5.7 Proponents Risk and Warranty 5.8 Confidentiality of Village s Information 6. Submission of Proposals 10 6.1 Time and Date for Receipt of Proposals 6.2 Submission Format 6.3 No Amendments to Proposals After Submission 6.4 Withdrawal of Proposals

Page 4 of 14 7. Evaluation 11 7.1 Evaluation Committee 7.2 Evaluation Criteria 8. Selection of Organizational Review Provider 12 8.1 Negotiation with Preferred Proponent 8.2 Recommendation to Village Council 8.3 Contract for Services 8.4 Contract Administration 8.5 Sub-contracting 8.6 Term of Contract 8.7 Budgetary Approval 8.8 Compliance with Laws 8.9 Insurance Requirements 8.10 Acting in Conflict

Page 5 of 14 PART A: PROPOSAL DETAILS 1. BACKGROUND 1.1 The Village of Burns Lake: The Village of Burns Lake is a community of approximately 3650 residents in Northern British Columbia, which includes two first nations reserves. It is primarily an industry based town for employment, and has a growing tourism industry. The ample mountain biking, fishing, hunting and other activities make it an ideal spot to live or visit for the outdoor enthusiast, or those who are looking for a break from the big city. It is a strong community that has endured much in recent years, with the explosion and fire at the Babine Forest Products Sawmill that killed two, seriously injured 17, and put hundreds more out of work. The community has since made tremendous strides toward recovery, but there is still considerable room for growth and improvement. The Village has two full service agreements for the First Nations Bands within the Village boundaries for the Burns Lake Band and the Lake Babine Nation. 1.2 Local Government in Burns Lake: The municipal government in Burns Lake has approximately 20 employees, in a variety of full-time, part-time, and seasonal positions partly within the CUPE bargaining unit, and 10 nonunion staff. Council, the Chief Administrative Officer, Protective Services, Public Works, Financial Services, Corporate Services, Communications, Economic Development, Development Services, are all located in the Village s downtown core, at The Village Office. A small, largely residential tax base means that cost efficiency is very important, as the residents still demand a high level of service from their government. 2. SCOPE OF SERVICES REQUIRED 2.1 Range of Services/Practice Areas: The range of services required by the Village includes the following scope of work: Objective review of the organization s structure Service delivery Staff Workload Positions Review of draft Non-Union Employment Policy for the purpose of creating a 2014 Employment Policy Wage Comparison 2.2 Engagement of Other Firms:

Page 6 of 14 The Village in any event reserves the right to engage any contractor, other than that with which it reaches an agreement(s), if any, pursuant to this RFP process, during the term of such an agreement(s), if it is deemed advantageous or appropriate. The Village reserves the right to do so at its own discretion. 3. REQUIRED SUBMISSION CONTENT In order to receive responses in a uniform format and to enable the fair evaluation of those received; Proponents should structure Item 2, as identified on the Proposal Submission Format (Appendix A to this RFP), of their proposal in the order outlined below, and provide the requested information, identifying each section by number. When responding to the following questions, please answer in the context of the particular organizational review service (s) to be provided. Please provide: 3.1 Name and Address of Company: The name, street address, mailing address, telephone number, fax number and e-mail address of the proponent s company, and any branch locations or affiliates that may be applicable. 3.2 Overview of Company: An overview of the proponent s company including its size, years in existence, any preferred or specialized area(s) of practice, an organizational chart, and an outline of the firm s experience in the applicable practice areas listed in section 2.1 of this RFP. Please outline, if any, your company s experience and affiliations with external agencies, such as: (i) Federal and provincial governments; (ii) other municipalities and regional districts; (iii) local government associations; (iv) educational institutions and programs; (v) any other agencies, associations or bodies that your firm considers appropriate for consideration. 3.3 Partners of Firm: A list of the partners of the proponent company, with a brief resume stating the background, experience and depth of knowledge in the applicable areas listed in section 2.1, of each of those partners. 3.4 Proposed Contract Administrator/Company Contact: The name of an individual who would be responsible for assigning and supervising the organizational review services provided to the Village pursuant to any agreements entered into following this RFP process. 3.5 Associates, Employees, Contractors of Firm:

Page 7 of 14 A list of associates, other employees and any anticipated contractors who might be assigned or engaged to provide services to the Village, the types of services and practice areas that they might be involved in, and their specific qualifications and experience as they relate to those service and practice areas. 3.6 References: A list of three (3) current or past clients, to which the proponent firm has supplied services similar in nature to those listed in section 2.1, who may be contacted as references. Please include a contact name and telephone number for each client as well as the years served. 3.7 Fee Structure/Billing Information: Detailed information on the proponent firm s fee structure and billing information. In particular, please address the following: All Fees relevant to fulfill all individual terms and conditions as set forth in the RFP as indicated within 2.1. All RFP proposals must include: o Frequency of billing; monthly, upon completion of cases, etc.; o Provisions for providing estimates of fees for extraordinary items; o Expected billing arrangements with any contractors who might be engaged as a subcontractor to provide services to the Village (for example, different hourly billable rates or different methods of billing); o Retainer details including any applicable estimated monthly retainer with an explanation of services covered within that retainer and when extra costs or billable hours would commence; o A list of services, if any, billed on a flat fee basis, and the fee charged; o A list of services, if any, available without charge; o Rates for costs other than those already noted (for example, travel time costs, office equipment costs, disbursements, including any applicable mark-up); o The time frame for which the above noted rates or costs would be held firm, and any trigger mechanisms which dictate adjustments to the rates or costs and the manner in which the firm would address these adjustments with the Village; o A sample services billing (demonstrating how billing is tracked by file, staff person/department requesting service, billable hours or other basis of calculation, disbursements, etc.); and o The firm s expected payment terms. 3.8 Additional Information: Please provide to the Village any additional information that the Proponent wishes considered in the evaluation of its proposal.

Page 8 of 14 PART B ADMINISTRATION 4. PURPOSE: The purpose of this Request for Proposals ( RFP ) is to solicit the best overall proposal(s) for the provision of an Organizational Review for The Village of Burns Lake (the Village ). Given the costs associated with municipal services, the Village hopes to more effectively manage these costs by selecting and entering into an agreement with a specific company for an organizational review of the Village of Burns Lake. This is NOT a tender call. Any proposals submitted pursuant to this RFP shall not be offers to contract for the provision of any of the services outlined herein, but shall only be used to identify a Preferred Proponent(s) with whom the Village may negotiate a contract for the provision of the services. 5. GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS: 5.1 Village Representative: Only the Chief Administrative Officer for the Village of Burns Lake (the Village s Representative ) is authorized to communicate and otherwise deal with Proponents, and all Proponents must communicate and otherwise deal with that person only. Contact with any other person, including members of Council, officers or employees of the Village regarding this RFP or the Proponents submissions may result in a proposal being removed from consideration. 5.2 Proponent Inquiries and RFP Clarification: All questions about the contents of this RFP, or about any matters relating to it (including as to any clarification, errors or omissions of or in this RFP), must be directed by email to the Village s Representative at the contact address noted on the Summary of Key Information before 3:00 p.m., local time on Dec 13, 2013. Information obtained from any other source is not official and may not be accurate. The Village s Representative will answer all questions by email. 5.3 Right to Cancel RFP and/or to Accept Proposals: This RFP is solely a request for proposals for the provision of the outlined services. It is not an invitation for tenders, an offer to contract, or an invitation for offers capable of acceptance to create a contract. Submission of a proposal by any Proponent and its subsequent receipt by the Village does not represent a commitment on the part of the Village to proceed further with any Proponent. No contractual or other legal obligations or relations between the Village and any other person can or will be created prior to the termination of this RFP process, or otherwise, except in a written contract executed by two authorized signatories of the Village under the authority of an express resolution of the Council of the Village of Burns Lake.

Page 9 of 14 The Village is entitled to cancel this RFP at any time by addendum issued to the Proponents, without liability for any loss, damage, cost or expense incurred or suffered by any Proponent as a result of that cancellation. In considering any proposals delivered in response to this RFP, the Village reserves the absolute and unfettered discretion to do any one or more of the following: Determine whether any proposal(s) satisfactorily meet the evaluation criteria set out in this RFP; Accept or reject any proposal that fails to comply with the requirements set out in this RFP for the content of proposals; Require clarification after the dates and times set out in this RFP from any one or more of the Proponents in respect of proposals submitted; Assess proposals as it sees fit, without in any way being obliged to select any proposal or Proponent; Assess and select proposals as it sees fit, without in any way being obliged to select the proposal or Proponent that offers the lowest price or cost; Communicate with, meet with, or negotiate with any one or more of the Proponents respecting their proposals or any aspects of the services outlined herein; Reject any or all proposals with or without cause, whether according to the evaluation criteria or otherwise; or Request further information from the marketplace or pursue other options. 5.4 Confidentiality of Proposals: The Village will receive all proposals submitted in response to this RFP in confidence, including for the purposes of section 21 of the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, c. 165. However, because of the right of access to records created by that Act, the Village cannot and does not guarantee that information contained in any proposals will remain confidential if a request for access in respect of any proposal is made under the Act. If a Proponent considers that any part of its proposal is proprietary, including by reason of its being copyright, the proposal must clearly identify those portions of it that are considered proprietary. 5.5 No Collusion: Proponents must not communicate, directly or indirectly, with any other Proponents (including through any employees, agents or contractors) regarding the preparation, content or submission of separate individual proposals. Each proposal must be submitted without any collusion, or knowledge, in the preparation of or about any other proposal. Submission of a proposal to the Village is deemed to be a representation and warranty by the Proponent submitting that proposal that it has complied with this paragraph. If the Village determines that a Proponent has violated this paragraph, the Village may disqualify that Proponent and reject its proposal as being invalid.

Page 10 of 14 5.6 Waiver of Liability for Errors: The Village has used considerable efforts to ensure an accurate representation of information in this RFP. However, the Village accepts no responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of this RFP (including any schedules, appendices or addenda) and no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made or given by the Village with respect to the accuracy or completeness of the RFP (including any schedules, appendices or addenda). 5.7 Proponent s Risk and Warranty: Each proponent is solely responsible for the risk and cost of preparing and submitting its proposal in response to this RFP and neither the Village nor its officials, employees or consultants (including the Village s Representative) are liable for the cost of doing so or obliged to remunerate or reimburse any Proponent for that cost. The sole risk, responsibility and liability connected with reliance by any Proponent or any other person on this RFP is that of each proponent. Each Proponent is responsible for obtaining its own independent financial, legal, accounting, or other advice with respect to the contents of this RFP. By submitting a proposal to the Village, each Proponent represents and warrants to the Village that the information in its proposal is, to the best of the Proponent s knowledge, accurate and complete. 5.8 Confidentiality of Village Information: This RFP is the property of the Village and is not to be copied or distributed without prior approval of the Village Representative referred to in section 5.1. Any information acquired about the Village by a proponent during this process must not be disclosed unless authorized by the Village, and this obligation will survive the termination of this RFP process. The awarding of any contract or the reaching of any agreement for the provision of organizational review of the Village of Burns Lake s Financial Services Department to the Village will not permit any Proponent to advertise a relationship with the Village without the Village s prior authorization. 6. SUBMISSION OF PROPOSALS 6.1 Final Time and Date for Receipt of Proposals: One(1) complete copy of each proposal (no 3 ring binders please) plus one loose, single-sided copy for copying, together in a sealed single envelope clearly marked as described in 6.2, must be received by the Village before 10:00 a.m. local time, on Friday, January 3 rd, 2014, addressed to: Chief Administrative Officer Village of Burns Lake Box 570, Burns Lake, B.C. V0J 1E0

Page 11 of 14 Any proposal not received before the time and date specified will be rejected as being invalid and will be returned unopened to the Proponent courier collect. All proposals and subsequent information or material received shall become the property of the Village and shall not be returned. The Village reserves the right to make extra copies of the proposals for use during the selection process only. 6.2 Submission Format: All proposals must be submitted, in the form outlined in Appendix A to this RFP, to the Village in hard copy form. DO NOT submit any proposal by electronic means such as facsimile transmission or electronic mail. Envelopes containing submitted proposals should be clearly marked with the full name and address of the Proponent, the RFP title, and the closing date and time noted in section 6.1 of this RFP. 6.3 No Amendments to Proposals After Submission Deadline: A Proponent shall not be permitted to change the wording or contents of a proposal after the submission deadline, unless requested to do so by the Village for the purpose of clarification. 6.4 Withdrawal of Proposals: Any Proponent may withdraw its proposal, either personally or by written request to the Village Representative, at any time prior to the scheduled closing date and time noted in section 6.1 of this RFP. 7. EVALUATION 7.1 Evaluation Committee: Proposals will be reviewed and evaluated by an evaluation committee comprised of Village CAO, Mayor, and Council. During the evaluation process any or all proponents may be invited to give written or oral presentations or to participate in interviews with the committee or both. 7.2 Evaluation Criteria: Proposals will be evaluated based upon, but not limited to, in any particular order, the following: Compliance with the RFP document, including provision of all information requested in sections 3.1 to 3.8 of the RFP; Demonstrated ability to provide services in, and proven expertise in, the practice areas required by the Village as listed in this RFP; Qualifications, experience, and professional development of the proponent s staff, and in particular those staff proposed to be generally handling the provision of the Village s services; Reference checks;

Page 12 of 14 Costs of services regarding to fees and billing; Quality of documents provided; 8. SELECTION OF ORGANIZATIONAL REVIEW PROVIDER 8.1 Negotiation with Preferred Proponent: The Village will select one Preferred Proponent as a result of this RFP process, and will enter into negotiations with the Preferred Proponent in an attempt to settle one agreement necessary to implement the services generally described in this RFP. Proponents must commit to negotiate in good faith with the Village if chosen as a Preferred Proponent. 8.2 Recommendation to Village Council: Following the conclusion of the evaluation process and any resulting negotiations, the Evaluation Committee will make a recommendation to Village Council with regard to a contract(s) for the provision of organizational review to the Village of Burns Lake. The final decision on whether to appoint any firm as the Village s organizational review provider, or whether to enter into any contract(s) for the provision of a organizational review is that of Village Council. 8.3 Contract for Services: The Village may, at its sole discretion and following any recommendation to, and direction provided by, Village Council, enter into a written contract with any one of the Proponents for the provision of the services generally described in this RFP. There shall be no agreement, and no Proponent shall acquire any legal or equitable rights or privileges with respect to this RFP or the services in question, until such a written contract has received Council approval and is duly executed by the signing authorities of the Proponent, and of the Village. Any response to this RFP may become part of any contract entered into with a successful proponent. 8.4 Contract Administration: Following the execution of any contract for service, which results from this RFP process, the Village will appoint a contract administrator. The service provider will be expected to name a counterpart contact, which will oversee the administration of the contract with regard to the service provider s responsibilities, and will provide information upon request to the Village s contract administrator or designate regarding the implementation and ongoing provision of service. 8.5 Sub-contracting: Sub-contracting may be permitted pursuant to any contract for service that may result from this RFP process. In the event of any proposed sub-contracting arrangement (which includes a joint proposal submitted by two bodies having no formal corporate links) the responsibility for the submission of a proposal, any subsequent negotiation, and the administration of any resulting contract for service will be that of the first Proponent named on the title page submitted pursuant to Appendix A of this RFP (the Proposal Submission Format).

Page 13 of 14 8.6 Term of Contract: Any contract for service, which results from this RFP process shall be effective from the date of commencement specified in the contract and shall continue subject to the terms and conditions of the contract. Such terms and conditions may include provisions for the extension, upon mutual agreement between the Village and the service provider, of the term of the contract. 8.7 Budgetary Approval: Any contract for service, which results from this RFP process, shall be subject to budgetary approval by the Village Council. 8.8 Compliance with Laws: Neither the acceptance of any proposal submitted pursuant to this RFP, nor the execution of any agreement for the provision of the service(s), as generally described in this RFP, is an explicit or implicit approval or waiver of the requirement of or for any permits, licences, fees, taxes or other legal requirements that would ordinarily be required for the implementation or operation of the service. A Proponent or service provider is solely responsible for complying with all applicable Federal, Provincial or Municipal legal requirements. 8.9 Insurance Requirements: Any contract for service, which results from this RFP process, will also include a term requiring the service provider(s) to, insofar as is legally permissible and not covered by the insurance noted above, indemnify and hold harmless the Village, its officers and employees, from any and all liability arising out of the service provider s or a contractor s performance or nonperformance of the terms of the contract or out of the provision of the service generally. 8.10 Acting in Conflict: Any contract for service, which results from this RFP process, will include a term prohibiting the service provider(s) from acting for any party whose interests are in conflict with those of the Village, unless specific prior waiver of that term has been given by the Village in each instance.

Page 14 of 14 APPENDIX A Proposal Submission Format: Please submit each copy of a submitted proposal in the following format: 1. Title Page: Showing RFP title, Proponent s name and address, closing date and time, and Proponent s contact person and telephone number. 2. Proposal: Include ALL information requested in sections 3.1 to 3.8 of the RFP. 3. Appendices: Any attached firm brochures, or other pertinent documents