Choosing Wisely: When to Use (or Not Use) Mediation to Obtain Cost Effective Closure in Exam & Collection Cases

Similar documents
Working with the IRS Office of Appeals What to Expect in Examination Appeals

McGladrey Tax Controversy Series Hot Topics in Tax Controversy Resolving Issues. January 26, 2012

Working with the IRS Office of Appeals

Sheldon M. Kay Troy L. Olsen February 20, Current Update on IRS Appeals Division and Other Acronyms, Including AJAC, RAP, ADR and NII

Fast Track and Appeals. David B. Blair David J. Fischer

Introduction to Appeals. October 2009

HOW THE 1998 TAX ACT AFFECTS YOUR DEALINGS WITH THE IRS APPEALS OFFICE. The IRS Restructuring and Reform Act of 1998.

Resolving Tax Controversies: An Overview For Counsel Association of Corporate Counsel, 2017 Back to School Symposium August 15, 2017

Part 4. Examining Process. Chapter 46. LB&I Examination Process. Section 5. Resolving the Examination Resolving the Examination

JOSEPH ALI Director, Technical Guidance Internal Revenue Service- Appeals Joe Ali is the Director for Appeals Technical Guidance.

The Audit is Over Now What?

IRS Appeals New Faces, New Challenges

Managing the LB&I Examination Process: Using the Quality Examination Process and other Examination processes to your best advantage

Busy Season. all year long. TRI Tax Resolution Institute. where your tax debt is your power!

Tax Executives Institute Detroit Chapter Meeting

Busy Season. all year long. TRI Tax Resolution Institute. where your tax debt is your power!

Internal Revenue Service Alternative Dispute Resolution Techniques

SEC. 5. SMALL CASE PROCEDURE FOR REQUESTING COMPETENT AUTHORITY ASSISTANCE.01 General.02 Small Case Standards.03 Small Case Filing Procedure

SECTION 5. SMALL CASE PROCEDURE FOR REQUESTING COMPETENT AUTHORITY ASSISTANCE.01 General.02 Small Case Standards.03 Small Case Filing Procedure

NAVIGATING AN IRS EXAM

ALI-ABA Course of Study Tax Controversy Practice: From Administrative Audit Through Litigation

14 Tips To Help Deal With (Or Avoid) The IRS In 2014

What s News in Tax Analysis That Matters from Washington National Tax

New and Notable in IRS Controversy. Brian Paperny AT&T (Moderator) Mario Manniello Verizon Heather Maloy EY Kevin Brown PwC

LIST OF SUBSTANTIVE CHANGES AND ADDITIONS. PPC s Guide to Dealing with the IRS. Twenty-third Edition (June 2015)

WRITTEN STATEMENT OF CHASTITY K. WILSON ON BEHALF OF THE THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS BEFORE

TRI Tax Resolution Institute. where your tax debt is your power! Busy Season. all year long

Effectively Representing the Taxpayer in a Substantiation and Penalty Case. US Tax Court Judicial Conference Tuesday March 27, 2018

Collection Due Process Hearing

Demystifying the IRS Appeals Process

Compliance Assurance Process (CAP) Internal Revenue Manual (IRM) Sections

2016 IRS Collections Representation Boot Camp

Managing Tax Audits and Appeals September 29-30, 2016 Washington, DC

INTERNAL MANUAL -- PASSPORT CERTIFICATION PROCEDURES

TAX CONTROVERSY & TRANSFER PRICING. December 2008

IRS Update: What s Happening Now

STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS Analyze This. By LG Brooks Enrolled Agent

IRS Examination Developments for High Tech Firms

25th Annual Health Sciences Tax Conference

TRI Tax Resolution Institute. where your tax debt is your power! Busy Season. all year long

IRS Provides Guidance on FBAR Penalties

LIST OF SUBSTANTIVE CHANGES AND ADDITIONS. PPC s Guide to Dealing with the IRS. Twenty-fourth Edition (June 2016)

IRS COLLECTION PROCEDURES AND TAXPAYER REMEDIES

LIST OF SUBSTANTIVE CHANGES AND ADDITIONS Route To: Partners PPC's Guide to Dealing with the IRS Managers. Twenty second Edition (June 2014)

Compliance Assurance Process (CAP) - Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Appeals NOTICE. ALI CLE - Handling a Tax Controversy: Audit, Appeals, Litigation and Collections October 8-9, 2015

TRI Tax Resolution Institute. where your client s tax debt is your power! Busy Season. all year long. (800)

501 Service Center Correspondence Audit Program

Table of Contents. About This Book How To Use This Book Foreword Acknowledgments Preface

Federal Circuit Affirms FPAA Tolled Statute for Partnership when Losses were Attributable To Another Partnership

Part 5. Collecting Process. Chapter 14. Installment Agreements. Section 1. Securing Installment Agreements Securing Installment Agreements

Sue or Settle? Strategic Thinking for Insurance Coverage Disputes (CLM018)


TABLE OF CONTENTS. SECTION 2 ELIGIBLE WITHHOLDING AGENTS Eligiblewithholdingagents Withholdingagentscurrentlyunderexamination...

Responding to Adverse IRS Audit Assessments: Audit Reconsideration Requests, IRS Appeals, and Settlement Strategies

The Federal Payroll Tax Case (Focus on Trust-Fund Recovery Penalty)

Overview of Today s Discussion

Settlement Offers. Pitching it Right, Covering all the Bases

Audits of Estate Tax Returns and Protecting the Fiduciary Client. Presented to the Estate and Financial Planning Council of Central New Jersey

Manager, Worldwide Markets (Compliance) LOCATION: 86/GY12 EXTENSION: 5131 DATE: 21 st February 2002 REFERENCE: Y2728 SUBJECT:

Changes in IRS Exam and Appeals Procedures (and their impact on R&D Tax Credits)

STATEMENT OF JENNIFER E. BREEN ON BEHALF OF THE AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION SECTION OF TAXATION BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON SMALL BUSINESS OF THE

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY. July 18, Susan L. Latham /s/ Susan L. Latham Director, Policy, Quality and Case Support

ALI-ABA Course of Study Sophisticated Estate Planning Techniques

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

OPR Discipline What You Need To Know

Contents. Introduction. International Transfer Pricing: Advance Pricing Arrangements (APAs)

T H E S T A T E B A R O F T E X A S T E X A S Y O U N G L A W Y E R S A S S O C I A T I O N GUARDIANSHIP GUIDE

LitigationManagement DRIVING DOWN COSTS. Reptile Alert! Unfair Standard? MAGAZINE. Enabling Early Case Resolution p.32. spring p. 16. p.

ONTARIO TRIAL LAWYERS ASSOCIATION (OTLA) OTLA s Submission to the Review of FSCO s Dispute Resolution Services

ENERGY FUELS INC. (the Company ) INSIDER TRADING POLICY

US Taxpayer Bill of Rights. Presentation of Nina E. Olson National Taxpayer Advocate 08 May 2017

Chapter 01 Introduction to Taxation, the Income Tax Formula, and Form 1040EZ

Conflicts of Interest Concerns for Tax Professionals. Kyle Coleman

Table of Contents. EA Exam Part

Abatement for cause under 6698 (a) (1) of the internal revenue code

ACCOUNTAX SCHOOL OF BUSINESS, INCORPORATED A Profile in Continuing Professional Education. Representing Clients During the Collections Process

INDIVIDUAL INCOME TAX PREPARATION ENGAGEMENT LETTER

DID YOU GET YOUR BADGE SCANNED? UPDATE ON LB&I ENFORCEMENT CAMPAIGNS

Designing an Effective Arbitration Clause

CASE EVALUATION AND JUDICIAL FORECLOSURE DO NOT MIX: PROCEED WITH CAUTION

Problem Contract Clauses and Why You Should Care. Steven Raskovich University Counsel April 21, 2009 FOA 2009 Annual Conference

Frequently Asked Questions Revised June 24, Why did the IRS issue internal guidance regarding offshore activities now?

POLICY LIMIT DEMANDS - PART II: A VIEW INTO THE OTHER ROOM

Representing the Innocent Spouse in Pre- and Post-Filing Tax Controversies

the possibility of a will perform for you. In either to obtain credit or for any other advice.

Recent Developments in Estate & Gift Tax

Tax Resolution Essentials

OVDI-OOR: FBAR Penalty Investigation (Post 10/22/04) Lead Sheet

Memorandum. Office of Chief Counsel Internal Revenue Service. Number: Release Date: 7/7/2006 CC:PA:APJP:B2:AMIELKE POSTN

Your Age: or older

New CFPB Mortgage Servicing Rules (Part 2): Loss Mitigation Procedures. John Rao Lisa Sitkin Josh Zinner

MEMORANDUM FOR EMPLOYMENT TAX TERRITORY MANAGERS, GROUP MANAGERS AND SPECIALISTS

OFFICE OF THE TAX OMBUD Limitations to the OTO Mandate and SARS Objections Procedure

THE IRS NEW 2014 OFFSHORE VOLUNTARY DISCLOSURE PROCEDURES ANALYZED IN THE NEW OFFSHORE ENFORCEMENT ENVIRONMENT

Federal Tax Controversies Technical Issues and Strategies

PITCHING THE PERFECT GAME:

IRS Policy Changes Impact R&D Credit IRS changes magnify the importance of methodology and documentation

H 7246 S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D

Canadian Property Tax

Transcription:

Choosing Wisely: When to Use (or Not Use) Mediation to Obtain Cost Effective Closure in Exam & Collection Cases Maxine Aaronson Law Office of Maxine Aaronson 600 N. Pearl St. Suite 2170 Dallas, Texas 75201 214.220.2050 www.federaltaxplanning.com

Origins of IRS Interest in ADR Administrative Dispute Resolution Act of 1996 applies to all federal agencies, including IRS 1998 IRS Restructuring and Reform Act enacts Code 7123, mandating ADR at the Appeals Division

Origins of IRS Interest in ADR LMSB FY2004 Currency and Cycle Time Improvement Initiative IRS recognized that shortening audit cycle by earlier resolution of recurring issues would result in better use of limited IRS resources Agency struggling to do more with less

Benefit to Taxpayers from IRS Currency Initiative Faster resolution of recurring issues reduces legal and accounting expense to taxpayers Certainty of tax treatment no Schedule UTP needed FIN 48 reserves can be reduced Minimizes risk of possible restatement of financial statements if reserve is not sufficient

Pre Filing Options Private Letter Ruling (traditional method) Not available for issues on no ruling list Annual update by first Rev. Proc. of each year e.g., 2017-1 Generally issued for prospective transactions Ability to get comfort rulings disappearing May hold up your transaction

Pre Filing Options Pre Filing Agreements (LB & I only) Covers current year return and up to four future years IRS approval required $218,600 user fee (up from $50,000 in 2015) Authority is Rev. Proc. 2016-30 Transaction must be complete

Pre Filing Options Pre Filing Agreements (LB & I only) Approximate acceptance rate into Pre Filing Agreement program is 67% since inception IRS Survey indicates TPs believe audit time reduced 48% by using PFA; IRS estimate is 30% reduction in audit time IRS reports high TP satisfaction with PFA (4.7 out on scale of 1 to 5)

Pre Filing Options Typical Pre Filing Agreement issues are: Worthless stock and bad debts Research credit Cost segregation studies Acquisition or disposition of a subsidiary Deduction of settlement costs, penalties and fines PFA is available for international issues

Pre Filing Options Pre Filing Agreement Statistics: Total time to required to process a PFA ranges from 9 to 14 months Through May of 2016, there have been 523 applications since program inception; 355 were accepted into the program and 261 of those have been closed with agreements.

Options During Exam Phase Delegation Order 4-24 Available to LB & I taxpayers only Request case manager settle issue in manner that is consistent with a prior Appeals settlement

Options During Exam Phase Involve Other IRS Personnel on Technical Issues Speak with IRS Field Counsel Consider a request for Technical Advice Seek a consultation with appropriate Issue Practice Groups or International Practice Networks

Options During Exam Phase Fast Track Settlement Brings an Appeals Officer to Exam Jurisdiction remains with Exam Either party may request; both must agree LB & I required to offer Fast Track Settlement IRS reports 83% settlement rate after Fast Track Settlement Authority is Rev. Proc. 2003-40

Options During Exam Phase Fast Track Settlement is available for LB & I, SB/SE and TE/GE taxpayers See Ann. 2011-5, Ann. 2008-105, Rev. Proc. 2003-40 Initiate FTS with Form 14017 Targeted 120 day closure at LB & I Targeted 60 day closure at SB/SE and TE/GE

Options During Exam Phase Timing of Fast Track Settlement Request After Notice of Proposed Adjustment Before issuance of 30 day letter Taxpayer must prepare a written response to Notice of Proposed Adjustment as part of Fast Track request

Options During Exam Phase Things to consider when using Fast Track Settlement: Neutral is an Appeals Officer no option for private co-mediator Taxpayer does not choose the Appeals Officer Appeals Officer does not have settlement authority that stays with Exam Division FTS can consider litigation hazards through the Appeals Officer s authority

Options During Exam Phase Things to consider when using Fast Track Settlement: FTS process is mostly facilitative The Appeals Officer may suggest a possible resolution at end of process but either party may reject it Using FTS does not waive traditional Appeals rights but will foreclose Post Appeals Mediation

Options During Exam Phase Early Referral to Appeals LB & I Taxpayers only Taxpayer must submit written request Use to break logjam and resolve a single issue (repeat with another issue if needed) Settlement authority and jurisdiction is with Appeals

Comparison Fast Track Settlement Jurisdiction at Exam Settlement Authority with Exam Scope: All unagreed issues Timing: After NOPA and before 30 day letter Early Referral to Appeals Jurisdiction at Appeals Settlement Authority with Appeals Scope: One issue Timing: Available at any time

Options During the Exam Phase SB/SE Fast Track Mediation - Collection Replaces and obsoletes Fast Track Mediation Authority is Rev. Proc. 2016-57 All other collection issues must be resolved first Issues to be mediated must be fully developed Request on Form 13369 Litigation hazards cannot be considered Mostly facilitative process

Options During the Exam Phase Fast Track Mediation - Collection Available for Offers in Compromise and Trust Fund cases OIC cases with liability over $50,000 must be reviewed by Chief Counsel before being finalized. See IRC 7122(b) Unclear if FTMC is available for other Collection issues, e.g., Installment Agreements

Options During the Exam Phase Fast Track Mediation - Collection Written submission is required Targeted completion date is 30-40 days Mediator is Appeals Officer, Taxpayer cannot choose the Mediator Cannot request same Appeals Officer at Appeals if FTMC does not succeed Case remains under Collection s jurisdiction

Options During the Exam Phase Suitable Issues for FTMC Value of assets, projections of future income, shared living arrangements in OIC cases Responsible person and willfulness determinations in TFRP cases Issues relating to whether designated payments were properly made

Options During the Exam Phase FTMC is not available for: Cases worked at an SB/SE Campus site Collection Appeals Program (CAP) cases Collection Due Process (CDP) cases Cases referred to the Department of Justice Cases where TP has failed to respond to IRS or submit documentation to Collection as required

Appeals Workloads IRS Data Book indicates that Appeals processes around 110,000 cases per year with about 66,000 open on any given day About 30-40% of Appeals receipts are from Exam; rest are primarily Collection and Collection Due Process cases

Post Examination Options Appeals Traditional process always available If Taxpayer has been through Fast Track Settlement, they can request same Appeals officer or be assigned a new Appeals Officer Cases unagreed after traditional Appeals conference may use Post Appeals Mediation if they have not used Fast Track processes already

Post Examination Options New Rapid Appeals Process (RAP) Cycle time for largest cases reportedly 700 days RAP is limited to LB & I cases that are assigned to an Appeals Team Case Leader. See IRM 8.26.11. Uses Fast Track techniques at first conference to try to resolve one or more issues Replaces traditional Appeals conference entirely for those issues; can still use traditional Appeals for other issues.

Post Examination Options Post Appeals Mediation IRS provides Appeals Officer to mediate Taxpayer may select a private Co-Mediator at taxpayer s expense Appeals Mediator may be from same office location but will report to different manager Taxpayer and IRS must agree to use Post Appeals Mediation

Post Examination Options Post Appeals Mediation Request after traditional Appeals fails Available to all taxpayers unless issue is specifically excluded or if Fast Track Settlement process has been used already IRS has reported 45 to 60 percent resolution rate on Post Appeals Mediation Targeted completion date is 60 day process

Post Examination Options Post Appeals Mediation Authority is Rev. Proc. 2014-63 Rev. Proc. 2014-63 expands types of cases Most significant change is the addition of Trust Fund and some Offer in Compromise cases Again, OIC cases where the liability exceeds $50,000 must be reviewed by Chief Counsel before being finalized. See IRC 7122(b)

Post Examination Options Post Appeals Mediation Not Available Collection cases other than OIC and TFRP OIC cases worked solely at an Appeals Campus/Service Center site Whipsaw issues, including innocent spouse Cases that have already participated in Fast Track Settlement or Fast Track Mediation (presumably will include Fast Track Mediation Collection)

Post Examination Options Examples of Suitable OIC Cases Asset valuation issues, including assets held by third parties and value of dissipated assets Projections of future income based on calculations that do not include current income Future ability to pay in shared living arrangements where roommate is not liable Deviations from national collection standards Other factual determinations

Post Examination Options OIC Cases Not Eligible for Post Appeals Mediation OIC submitted as a collection alternative in CDP Cases worked solely at Appeals Campus/Service Center site Cases requiring a level of approval higher than Appeals Team Manager Expenses covered by published IRS guidance

Post Examination Options Trust Fund Recovery Issues Suitable for Post Appeals Mediation Responsible party issues Willfulness issues Issues regarding Designated Payments Trust Fund Recovery Issues Not Eligible for Post Appeals Mediation Collectability of TFRP once assessed

Post Examination Options Co-Mediator Selection Tips: Mediation requires specialized skills and experience Most common credential is 40 hour course Substantive tax expertise is very important Look for seasoned mediator with experience mediating with governmental entities Prior experience using co-mediation model is very desirable

Post Examination Options Post Appeals Mediation Statement Tips: Requires a written mediation submission Mediation submission will be shared with Appeals (it will not be confidential) Submission should focus on the risks to the other side and the problems in their case (e.g., don t just pound your chest) Remember that the co-mediators are not the people you need to persuade

Post Examination Options Other Things to Consider When Choosing Post Appeals Mediation Settlement authority is with the Appeals Manager/Team Leader. This may be good or bad. Probe to make sure that the government really wants to mediate the case and is not just going through the motions to get their ticket punched Possibility of being able to close out issue in other years can be a very good thing

Post Examination Options Other Things to Consider When Choosing Post Appeals Mediation Post Appeals Mediation can be an excellent option if your Appeals Officer is way off base If the case is settled, Taxpayer will avoid any public disclosure that comes with court filing If the case does not settle, the mediation statement may become the basis of your trial brief

Receipts Selected IRS ADR Statistics FY 2015 Fast Track Settlement L B & I: 87 Fast Track Settlement SB/SE: 177 Post Appeals Mediation: 99 Closures Fast Track Settlement L B & I: 76 Fast Track Settlement SB/SE: 182 Post Appeals Mediation: 110

Options in Docketed Cases All federal district courts and the US Court of Federal Claims have adopted ADR programs as a result of the 1998 Alternative Dispute Resolution Act In Tax Court, Rule 124 specifically provides for mediation and arbitration Can get another bite at the apple if docketed