Sevierville (City of) TN

Similar documents
City of Oakland, CA. Update to Credit Analysis. CREDIT OPINION 19 April Summary

Sanger (City of) TX. Credit Strengths. Trend of growing reserve levels. Continued tax base growth. Favorable location 40 miles north of Dallas

Newport News (City of) VA

Butler (Village of), WI

Carroll (County of) MD

Socorro Independent School District, TX

Cocoa (City of) FL. Update to credit analysis following assignment of Aa2 issuer rating. CREDIT OPINION 12 April Summary.

Lubbock (City of), TX

WILTON (TOWN OF) CT. Update to credit analysis. Credit strengths. » Affluent residential tax base. Credit challenges

Weber School District, UT

Edison (Township of) NJ

Westport (Town of) CT

Township of Tredyffrin, PA

Socorro Independent School District, TX

Roselle Park Borough, NJ

Bexar County, TX. Exhibit 1 Assessed Valuation Gains Reflect Continued Economic Activity CLIENT SERVICES. Source: Bexar County, TX,

Columbia School District, MO

Newport News, VA. Summary Rating Rationale. Credit Strengths. Strong financial management. Credit Challenges. Below average demographics

Prince William County, VA

Allen Independent School District, TX

City of Mesquite, TX

Town of Beekman, NY. Credit Strengths. Solid reserve and liquidity levels. Low debt burden with rapid repayment. Credit Challenges

Findlay City School District, OH

Agenda. New Mexico School District Bond Ratings 9/8/17

Rockwall County, TX. Summary Rating Rationale. Credit Strengths. Above average socioeconomic indices. Credit Challenge

St. Mary's County, MD

Snohomish County Public Utility District 1

Cherokee County Board of Education, AL

Montgomery County, TX

Town of Easton, MA. Credit Strengths. Manageable long-term liabilities. Credit Challenges. Reliance on reserves to address budget gaps

Bothell (City of) WA

City of Tega Cay, SC. Annual Comment on Tega Cay RATING. ISSUER COMMENT 23 March 2018

Prince William County, VA

Huffman Independent School District, TX

Celina Independent School District, TX

Rio Rancho, NM. Credit Strengths. Sizeable and stable tax base. Healthy reserves. Manageable debt burden with rapid payout.

City of Isle of Palms, SC

Volusia County School District (FL)

State Outlook: Debt Affordability. NCSL Conference Gail Sussman, Managing Director

Port Jefferson Union Free School District, NY

Taos Municipal School District 1, NM

OECD Workshop on Data Collection

Oakland (City of), CA

Celina Independent School District, TX

Policy for Designating and Assigning Unsolicited Credit Ratings

Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago, IL

Montgomery County, TX

City of Oak Creek, WI

Bernalillo Municipal School District 1 (Sandoval County), NM

Park District of La Grange, IL

Wicomico County, MD. Credit Strengths. » Well-funded pension plan. Credit Challenges. Factors that Could Lead to an Upgrade

Policy for Designating and Assigning Unsolicited Credit Ratings in the European Union

Findlay City School District, OH

Rating Action: Moody's assigns Aa3 to West Virginia SBA's $44.4M Capital Improvement Ref. Rev. Bonds, Ser Global Credit Research - 08 Sep 2017

West Fargo Public School District No. 6, ND

Hoover (City of), AL

New Issue: Moody's assigns Aa2 to Framingham, MA's $43.9M GO bonds, MIG 1 to $4.4M GO BANs

US Local Government GO Debt Methodology

Moody s Muni Bond Rating Criteria & KS Local Government Trends

Rating Update: Moody's affirms Aa3 on Waukegan Park District, IL's GO debt

New Issue: Moody's assigns MIG 1 to Oakland City's (CA) TRAN

Township of Nutley, NJ

Rating Action: Moody's downgrades Lowe's unsecured ratings to Baa1; P-2 commercial paper rating affirmed 12 Dec 2018

George W. Kuhn Drainage District (Oakland County), MI

Somerset Hills School District, NJ

Masconomet Regional School District, MA

Connecticut (State of) State Revolving Fund

Evanston (City of), IL

New Issue: Moody's upgrades Edgewater, NJ's GO to Aa2: assigns MIG 1 to $15.4M in BANs

Metropolitan Water District of So. California

Las Cruces School District 2, NM

Shreveport, LA. Credit Strengths. Credit Challenges. Very limited liquidity. Weak income and employment trends. Factors that Could Lead to an Upgrade

Underwriting standards for credit cards and auto loans tighten modestly, a positive

blend Funding plc Update to credit analysis Credit strengths » Liquidity reserve as structural enhancement Credit challenges

Massachusetts (Commonwealth of)

Mongolian Banking System

Dallas County Community College District, TX

Siauliu Bankas, AB. Siauliu Bankas capital metrics will strengthen with EBRD s debt-to-equity conversion. ISSUER COMMENT 13 August 2018

City of Las Cruces, NM

Regional Economic Outlook

Barcelona, City of. Annual update. Barcelona's good operating performance. B= Budget. PC: Pre-closing. Source: Issuer. Moody's Investors Service.

Rating Action: Moody's Upgrades the City of Sacramento, CA's Lease Revenue Bonds to A1; Confirms Ser and Ser. 1993A at A2; outlook is stable

Policy on the "SEC Rule 17g-7 of Representation and Warranties" (R&Ws)

ABN AMRO Bank N.V. Q1 2018: Higher impairment offset revenue growth. ISSUER COMMENT 16 May Summary opinion

Rating Action: Moody's assigns A2 to 2016B & C Senior Bonds of Central Florida Expressway Auth. (CFX), FL; Outlook positive

Rating Action: Moody's reviews NORD/LB Luxembourg S.A. - Public-Sector Covered Bonds, direction uncertain 19 Dec 2018

Grinnell College, IA

Duquesne University of the Holy Spirit, PA

Duquesne University, PA

American University, DC

New Issue: Moody's assigns Aaa to Bronxville NY's $5.2M GO Bonds

Rating Action: Moody's affirms Aa1 issuer and bond ratings of the International Finance Facility for Immunisation (IFFIm) with a stable outlook

Jersey City Community Charter School, NJ

Federal Home Loan Banks

Special Tax: Transportation-Related

3i Group plc. Update following the publication of first-half 2018 financial results. CREDIT OPINION 28 November Update

Rating Action: Moody's assigns A2 to Wayne County Airport Auth. (MI) Series 2017 E senior lien revenue bonds

Rating Action: Moody's upgrades Kommunalkredit Austria AG's public-sector covered bonds Global Credit Research - 25 Jul 2017

Rating Action: Moody's assigns A1 to UConn GO bonds supported by State of Connecticut; outlook stable Global Credit Research - 29 Mar 2018

Los Alamos Public School District, NM

Transcription:

CREDIT OPINION Sevierville (City of) TN Update to credit analysis Summary Sevierville, TN (Aa3) benefits from healthy financial operations resulting in strong reserve and liquidity levels. While the city's debt burden is elevated, conservative budget practices and continued economic growth partially mitigate this risk. Contacts Shelby Schwabauer +1.212.553.4766 Analyst shelby.schwabauer@moodys.com Credit strengths» Moderately-sized and growing tax base Orlie Prince +1.212.553.7738 VP-Sr Credit Officer/ Manager orlie.prince@moodys.com» Strong reserve levels CLIENT SERVICES Credit challenges Americas 1-212-553-1653 Asia Pacific 852-3551-3077» Tourism-based economy has proven resilient in the face of recent wild fires and in the face of the 2008 recession» Elevated debt burden with variable rate exposure Japan 81-3-5408-4100» Exposure to economically sensitive revenues EMEA 44-20-7772-5454» Residential wealth levels are below average Rating outlook Moody's does not usually assign outlooks to local government credits with this amount of debt outstanding. Factors that could lead to an upgrade» Material reduction in debt burden» Substantial increase in tax base size Factors that could lead to a downgrade» Any additional increase in debt burden» Material decrease in cash or reserve levels» Large, prolonged tax base contractions

Key indicators Exhibit 1 Sevierville (City of) TN 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 $2,276,478 $2,285,241 $2,302,256 $2,322,228 $2,468,073 15,259 15,592 15,903 16,213 16,213 $149,189 $146,565 $144,769 $143,232 $152,228 65.1% 61.5% 61.0% 58.7% 58.7% Operating Revenue ($000) $26,781 $33,009 $32,654 $36,164 $38,038 Fund Balance ($000) $11,554 $12,481 $13,998 $16,076 $18,479 Cash Balance ($000) Economy/Tax Base Total Full Value ($000) Population Full Value Per Capita Median Family Income (% of US Median) Finances $8,899 $9,214 $11,069 $13,159 $15,486 Fund Balance as a % of Revenues 43.1% 37.8% 42.9% 44.5% 48.6% Cash Balance as a % of Revenues 33.2% 27.9% 33.9% 36.4% 40.7% $196,368 $218,455 $215,085 $211,995 $208,605 $26,574 $30,759 $36,863 $40,658 $47,505 7.3x 6.6x 6.6x 5.9x 5.5x 8.6% 9.6% 9.3% 9.1% 8.5% Moody's - adjusted Net Pension Liability (3-yr average) to Revenues (x) 1.0x 0.9x 1.1x 1.1x 1.2x Moody's - adjusted Net Pension Liability (3-yr average) to Full Value (%) 1.2% 1.3% 1.6% 1.8% 1.9% Debt/Pensions Net Direct Debt ($000) 3-Year Average of Moody's ANPL ($000) Net Direct Debt / Operating Revenues (x) Net Direct Debt / Full Value (%) Source: Moody's Investors Service Profile Sevierville is located in eastern Tennessee, approximately 24 miles east of Knoxville (Aa1) and 14 miles north of the Great Smoky Mountains National Park. The city serves a population of approximately 14,800. Detailed credit considerations Economy and Tax Base: Tourism-based economy remains stable The city's $2.5 billion tax base will experience steady growth over the near-term given retail and residential development projects. The city's economy benefits from participation in the Knoxville MSA and its location near the Smoky Mountains. The local economy is a popular domestic tourist destination, with multiple and diverse attractions that tend to draw tourists and seasonal residents even amid economic downturns. These include the Dollywood theme park and resort, the Great Smoky Mountains National Park, the Ripley's Aquarium of the Smokies, and numerous related entertainment and retail venues. Despite the 2016 forest fires, tourism in the area continues to increase. In addition to its tourism components, the county economy includes the Mountain Home VA Medical Center, a 29,610-square foot Sevier County Health Department facility, and an East Tennessee State University satellite campus. The city's tax base is slightly concentrated with the ten largest taxpayers accounting for 20.6% of total assessed value. Concentration continues to decrease as the tax base grows and diversifies. Anticipated future developments includes a couple restaurants and new residential lots. Five-year average annual full value growth has been sound at 2.9%, and full value per capita is a robust $152,228. The county unemployment rate was 2.9% in December 2017 which compares well to both state (3.1%) and national (3.9%) averages. Wealth indices remain below average with a median family income that is 69% and 58.7% of the state and nation respectively. Financial operations and reserves: Strong operating history with solid reserve levels The city's financial position is expected to remain strong given solid reserve levels and conservative budgetary practices including a formalized fund balance policy. The city generated a $2.5 million General Fund surplus in fiscal 2017, marking the second consecutive This publication does not announce a credit rating action. For any credit ratings referenced in this publication, please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page on www.moodys.com for the most updated credit rating action information and rating history. 2

operating surplus. In the past six years, the city has increased its available General Fund reserves from $11.2 million (43.5% of revenues) in 2012 to $18.5 million (46.7% of revenues) as of 2017. The city's Central Business Improvement District (CBID) Fund, which can be used to support TDZ related debt service, ended the year with a $1.3 million surplus increasing reserves to $10.3 million (140% of revenues). Surplus operations resulted from growth in sales tax and property tax revenues. The fiscal 2018 budget reflects a sizable surplus that will increase General Fund reserves to $21 million or 46.3% of fiscal 2018 revenues. The budget represents a 14.5% increase over fiscal 2017 due primarily to the receipt of bond proceeds. The city's economy is primarily tourism based and, as such, city tends to maintain very low property tax rates and instead imposes a variety of consumption and transient use taxes in an effort to shift the cost of services to non-resident visitors. The result is an operating budget with a high degree of exposure to economically sensitive revenues, however the city has historically maintained healthy levels of liquidity and reserves to buffer potential revenue declines as well as liquidity risks associated with its demand debt and swaps. Conservative budgeting and a formalized fund balance mitigate this volatility. Under the formal fund balance policy, reserves must be above 25% of expenditures. LIQUIDITY The city maintains sound liquid reserves. In fiscal 2017 the city had $15.5 million or 39.1% of revenues in its General Fund alone. Including the CBID Fund, total cash and investments was $25.8 million at the end of fiscal 2017. Debt and Pensions: Elevated debt burden with variable rate exposure The city's net direct debt burden of 8.9% of full value, after self-supporting electric system debt is backed out, is high. However, 66.4% of the city's outstanding debt is related to the tourism development zone (TDZ), which the city is able to use dedicated sales tax revenues to pay debt service. The city has structured the TDZ-related debt for interest-only debt service while the zone continues to develop. TDZ revenues, approximately $7.4 million in fiscal 2017,do not currently permit the permanent financing of all TDZ debt. Accordingly, much of the debt remains in short-term or interest-only modes, and the related payout of principal is very slow. The city's capital improvement plan includes debt issuance to fund a wastewater plant expansion, which will be secured through water and sewer revenues. Because the city's debt burden is already high, any additional borrowing could put downward pressure on its credit rating. DEBT STRUCTURE Of the $184 million in direct city debt, approximately 58% is in variable rate mode and is largely hedged by three interest rate swaps. DEBT-RELATED DERIVATIVES The city's three swaps (excluding the swap on self-supporting electric debt) are with Morgan Keegan Financial Products as counterparty and Deutsche Bank AG (A3) as Credit Support Provider (CSP). As of a March 30, 2018 valuation, the three swaps had a combined markto-market value of $16.4 million in favor of the CSP. While collateral thresholds are infinite with the city's credit rating above A3, and only the city has optional termination, we do note that there are potential termination risks should the Deutsche Bank rating fall below A3 and the bank fail to deliver collateral under the CSA, or should the Deutsche Bank rating fall below Baa1 coupled with failure by the bank to find a replacement CSP. The risk is somewhat mitigated because the mark-to-market value is in favor of Deutsche Bank. The city's five variable rate issues are currently in index rate mode bank placements, with the nearest term expiration in June 2019. Other than for various events of default, the issues cannot be tendered prior to the term expiration date. PENSIONS AND OPEB The city participates in the Political Subdivision Pension Plan (PSPP), an agent multiple-employer defined benefit plan administered by the Tennessee Consolidated Retirement System (TCRS). Annual required contributions (ARC) totaled $2.4 million for the plan. The city's payments to the plan constituted 100% of the ARC in fiscal 2017. The city's adjusted net pension liability, under Moody's methodology for adjusting reported pension data, is $47.5 million, or a below average 1.25 times operating revenues. Management and Governance: Fiscally conservative management team Sevierville benefits from fiscally conservative management, evidenced by its healthy reserve levels, trend of surplus operations and formalized fund balance policy. Tennessee Cities have an Institutional Framework score of Aaa, which is high compared to the nation. Institutional Framework scores measure a sector's legal ability to increase revenues and decrease expenditures. The sector has one or more major revenue sources 3

that are not subject to any caps. Unpredictable revenue fluctuations tend to be moderate, or between 5-10% annually. Across the sector, fixed and mandated costs are generally less than 25% of expenditures. Tennessee is a Right to Work state, providing significant expenditure-cutting ability. Unpredictable expenditure fluctuations tend to be minor, under 5% annually. 4

2018 Moody s Corporation, Moody s Investors Service, Inc., Moody s Analytics, Inc. and/or their licensors and affiliates (collectively, MOODY S ). All rights reserved. CREDIT RATINGS ISSUED BY, INC. AND ITS RATINGS AFFILIATES ( MIS ) ARE MOODY S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES, AND MOODY S PUBLICATIONS MAY INCLUDE MOODY S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES. MOODY S DEFINES CREDIT RISK AS THE RISK THAT AN ENTITY MAY NOT MEET ITS CONTRACTUAL, FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS AS THEY COME DUE AND ANY ESTIMATED FINANCIAL LOSS IN THE EVENT OF DEFAULT. CREDIT RATINGS DO NOT ADDRESS ANY OTHER RISK, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: LIQUIDITY RISK, MARKET VALUE RISK, OR PRICE VOLATILITY. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY S OPINIONS INCLUDED IN MOODY S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT STATEMENTS OF CURRENT OR HISTORICAL FACT. MOODY S PUBLICATIONS MAY ALSO INCLUDE QUANTITATIVE MODEL-BASED ESTIMATES OF CREDIT RISK AND RELATED OPINIONS OR COMMENTARY PUBLISHED BY MOODY S ANALYTICS, INC. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY S PUBLICATIONS DO NOT CONSTITUTE OR PROVIDE INVESTMENT OR FINANCIAL ADVICE, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT AND DO NOT PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS TO PURCHASE, SELL, OR HOLD PARTICULAR SECURITIES. NEITHER CREDIT RATINGS NOR MOODY S PUBLICATIONS COMMENT ON THE SUITABILITY OF AN INVESTMENT FOR ANY PARTICULAR INVESTOR. MOODY S ISSUES ITS CREDIT RATINGS AND PUBLISHES MOODY S PUBLICATIONS WITH THE EXPECTATION AND UNDERSTANDING THAT EACH INVESTOR WILL, WITH DUE CARE, MAKE ITS OWN STUDY AND EVALUATION OF EACH SECURITY THAT IS UNDER CONSIDERATION FOR PURCHASE, HOLDING, OR SALE. MOODY S CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY RETAIL INVESTORS AND IT WOULD BE RECKLESS AND INAPPROPRIATE FOR RETAIL INVESTORS TO USE MOODY S CREDIT RATINGS OR MOODY S PUBLICATIONS WHEN MAKING AN INVESTMENT DECISION. IF IN DOUBT YOU SHOULD CONTACT YOUR FINANCIAL OR OTHER PROFESSIONAL ADVISER. ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS PROTECTED BY LAW, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, COPYRIGHT LAW, AND NONE OF SUCH INFORMATION MAY BE COPIED OR OTHERWISE REPRODUCED, REPACKAGED, FURTHER TRANSMITTED, TRANSFERRED, DISSEMINATED, REDISTRIBUTED OR RESOLD, OR STORED FOR SUBSEQUENT USE FOR ANY SUCH PURPOSE, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN ANY FORM OR MANNER OR BY ANY MEANS WHATSOEVER, BY ANY PERSON WITHOUT MOODY S PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY ANY PERSON AS A BENCHMARK AS THAT TERM IS DEFINED FOR REGULATORY PURPOSES AND MUST NOT BE USED IN ANY WAY THAT COULD RESULT IN THEM BEING CONSIDERED A BENCHMARK. All information contained herein is obtained by MOODY S from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human or mechanical error as well as other factors, however, all information contained herein is provided AS IS without warranty of any kind. MOODY'S adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning a credit rating is of sufficient quality and from sources MOODY'S considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent third-party sources. However, MOODY S is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing the Moody s publications. To the extent permitted by law, MOODY S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability to any person or entity for any indirect, special, consequential, or incidental losses or damages whatsoever arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information, even if MOODY S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers is advised in advance of the possibility of such losses or damages, including but not limited to: (a) any loss of present or prospective profits or (b) any loss or damage arising where the relevant financial instrument is not the subject of a particular credit rating assigned by MOODY S. To the extent permitted by law, MOODY S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability for any direct or compensatory losses or damages caused to any person or entity, including but not limited to by any negligence (but excluding fraud, willful misconduct or any other type of liability that, for the avoidance of doubt, by law cannot be excluded) on the part of, or any contingency within or beyond the control of, MOODY S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers, arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information. NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF ANY SUCH RATING OR OTHER OPINION OR INFORMATION IS GIVEN OR MADE BY MOODY S IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER. Moody s Investors Service, Inc., a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody s Corporation ( MCO ), hereby discloses that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by Moody s Investors Service, Inc. have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to Moody s Investors Service, Inc. for appraisal and rating services rendered by it fees ranging from $1,500 to approximately $2,500,000. MCO and MIS also maintain policies and procedures to address the independence of MIS s ratings and rating processes. Information regarding certain affiliations that may exist between directors of MCO and rated entities, and between entities who hold ratings from MIS and have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5%, is posted annually at www.moodys.com under the heading Investor Relations Corporate Governance Director and Shareholder Affiliation Policy. Additional terms for Australia only: Any publication into Australia of this document is pursuant to the Australian Financial Services License of MOODY S affiliate, Moody s Investors Service Pty Limited ABN 61 003 399 657AFSL 336969 and/or Moody s Analytics Australia Pty Ltd ABN 94 105 136 972 AFSL 383569 (as applicable). This document is intended to be provided only to wholesale clients within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. By continuing to access this document from within Australia, you represent to MOODY S that you are, or are accessing the document as a representative of, a wholesale client and that neither you nor the entity you represent will directly or indirectly disseminate this document or its contents to retail clients within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. MOODY S credit rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a debt obligation of the issuer, not on the equity securities of the issuer or any form of security that is available to retail investors. It would be reckless and inappropriate for retail investors to use MOODY S credit ratings or publications when making an investment decision. If in doubt you should contact your financial or other professional adviser. Additional terms for Japan only: Moody's Japan K.K. ( MJKK ) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody's Group Japan G.K., which is wholly-owned by Moody s Overseas Holdings Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of MCO. Moody s SF Japan K.K. ( MSFJ ) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of MJKK. MSFJ is not a Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization ( NRSRO ). Therefore, credit ratings assigned by MSFJ are Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings. Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings are assigned by an entity that is not a NRSRO and, consequently, the rated obligation will not qualify for certain types of treatment under U.S. laws. MJKK and MSFJ are credit rating agencies registered with the Japan Financial Services Agency and their registration numbers are FSA Commissioner (Ratings) No. 2 and 3 respectively. MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) hereby disclose that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) for appraisal and rating services rendered by it fees ranging from JPY200,000 to approximately JPY350,000,000. MJKK and MSFJ also maintain policies and procedures to address Japanese regulatory requirements. REPORT NUMBER 5 1120523

CLIENT SERVICES 6 Americas 1-212-553-1653 Asia Pacific 852-3551-3077 Japan 81-3-5408-4100 EMEA 44-20-7772-5454