XBRL US Corporate Actions Taxonomy 2012 Scope

Similar documents
XBRL US Schedule of Investments Taxonomy v2008. Campbell Pryde Chief Standards Officer XBRL US, Inc.

Version 1.0 November 30, Campbell Pryde Chief Standards Officer XBRL US, Inc.

Resolution of Comments

Corporate Actions Project:

XBRL based reporting in the Indian Mutual Fund Industry A Case Study

Proposed Interim Release Package 2 on the IFRS Taxonomy 2013

Implementation Guide Series

Version 1.0. Liquidation Basis of Accounting (UGT Version 2014) FASB U.S. GAAP Financial Reporting Taxonomy (UGT) Implementation Guide Series

COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) No /.. of

Michael Ohata Managing Director - KPMG. Landon Westerlund Audit Partner - Financial Services -KPMG

FASB U.S. GAAP Financial Reporting Taxonomy (Taxonomy)

19 th XBRL International Conference

FASB U.S. GAAP Financial Reporting Taxonomy (UGT) Implementation Guide Series

Academic Track:04 Academic Developments New EDINET taxonomy creates new transparency for market, XBRL of material fact for investors

Insurance Industry: Concentration of Credit Risk Disclosures (UGT Version 2013)

Belgian Primary Financial Statement Commercial and Industrial Taxonomy Release Date: Release Type: Final version Taxonomy Documentation

IFRS Taxonomy January Proposed Interim Release XBRL/2014/1. IFRS 9 Financial Instruments (Hedge Accounting)

ixbrl 7 September 2017 Paul Braden - KPMG

Taxonomy Summit Methodology for architecting EIOPA taxonomies Eric JARRY March 22, 2012

XBRL at the Federal Public Services Finance, Belgium Caroline Dupae, Project lead

FORM 20-F/A. Shinhan Financial Group Co., Ltd.

SEC Proposes New Rules Mandating XBRL-Format Filings. by Joseph D. Kline, Elaine Wolff and William L. Tolbert, Jr.

Summary of the IFRS Taxonomy Consultative Group discussions

European Single Electronic Format (ESEF) ESMA Meet-the-Market Workshop 6 June 2017

XBRL Past, Present and Future (Utilising Hyperion EPM for COREP & FINREP reporting) Presenters Michael Grieger & Josef Macdonald

U.S. GAAP Financial Reporting Taxonomy Release Notes for:

ANNA-DSB Product Committee Final ISIN Principles 28 th March 2017

A Business Case to Improve Corporate Actions Communications

FpML Response to: Updated Model Rules Derivatives Product Determination and Trade Repositories and Derivatives Data Reporting dated June 6, 2013

April IFRS Taxonomy Update. IFRS Taxonomy Disclosure Initiative (Amendments to IAS 7)

XBRL US Statement on Standards and Title IV of H.R. 1675

Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) Taxonomy 2014

FINANCIAL REPORT FILING REQUIREMENTS AROUND THE WORLD PROFILE: Australia

FILING OF ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS TO THE CIPC IN XBRL

Developing a straight-through process for corporate actions in Australia

SEC Proposes Amendments Requiring Companies to use extensible Business Reporting Language, or XBRL

FILING OF ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS TO THE CIPC IN XBRL

Submission of ixbrl Financial Statements as part of Corporation Tax Returns

March IFRS Taxonomy Update. IFRS Taxonomy Annual Improvements

FASB U.S. GAAP Financial Reporting Taxonomy (Taxonomy) Implementation Guide Series

XBRL Taxonomy Recognition Process

Final Report Guidelines on Internalised Settlement Reporting under Article 9 of CSDR

Budget-based benefits selection 2.0 SP03

Standards at transactional and aggregated level

Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV

Court Policy Interface Requirements

IFRS Taxonomy 2018 Proposed Update 1 Common Practice (IFRS 13 Fair Value Measurement) A detailed review. IFRS Foundation.

NASDAQ CSD CORPORATE ACTION SERVICE DESCRIPTION. Nasdaq Central Securities Depository in Baltic

March IFRS Taxonomy Update. IFRS Taxonomy Common Practice (agriculture, leisure, franchises, retail and financial institutions)

Corporate Actions Europe 2010

BE-TAX TAXONOMY ARCHITECTURE GUIDE

Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities. FASB U.S. GAAP Financial Reporting Taxonomy (Taxonomy)

July 30, Secretary Securities and Exchange Commission 100F Street, NE Washington, D.C

XBRL Demystified BASICS AND OVERVIEW OF XBRL

XBRL in Taxation: The Business Case Walter Hamscher Chair, Steering Committee, XBRL International 11 August 2002

Solution Training. Risk & Compliance: Financial Risk Management and Financial Performance Management Solutions

Submission of ixbrl Financial Statements as part of Corporation Tax Returns. Part 41A-03-01

Syndicated Loan FpML Requirements

FORM 10-K/A (Amendment No. 1) CAPSTONE COMPANIES, INC. (Exact name of small business issuer as specified in its charter)

166 FERC 61,027 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION. 18 CFR Parts 141 and 385. [Docket No. RM ]

Software Manual for XBRL filing. (Regulation 27A Format For Reconciliation of Share Capital Audit)

Consultation Paper Guidelines on Internalised Settlement Reporting under Article 9 of CSDR

Course 80535A Finance Advanced in Microsoft Dynamics NAV 2013

Application for Listing on International OTCQX

March IFRS Taxonomy Update. IFRS Taxonomy Prepayment Features with Negative Compensation (Amendments to IFRS 9)

Version 1.0 / January GRIP Channels User s Manual

FASB U.S. GAAP Financial Reporting Taxonomy (Taxonomy)

FASB Taxonomy Advisory Group Meeting. Date: May 28, 2015 Location: FASB Board Room

GUIDANCE NOTES FOR THE COMPLETION OF THE BASEL II FORMS AND THE QUARTERLY PRUDENTIAL RETURNS. December 2010 CAYMAN ISLANDS MONETARY AUTHORITY

ESMA Consultation Paper: Guidelines on Reporting Obligations under Article 3 and Article 24 of the AIFMD.

CCH ixbrl Review & Tag. Version Release Notes

ICB Tax Conference London 17 November 2011

PFRD System Frequently Asked Questions

Contents Contents... 2 Disclaimer... 3 DTC TaxReliefSM... 4 DTC TaxInfo(SM)... 7 U.S. Tax Withholding... 8 U.S. Tax Information and Resources...

FORM 10-Q. ADVANCED OXYGEN TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C Form 10 K/A (Amendment No. 1)

Financial Performance Management Training Catalog. Management Planning and Control Vantage Risk and Budgeting

The OCEG Open Risk Classification using XBRL

To assist recordkeepers in this task, Mid Atlantic has developed the Investment Toolkit. The Toolkit provides the following services:

Croatia Fiscalization Fiscalization in Financial Accounting

LIB-MS. Smart solution for your life insurance business

ACER Consultation on the REMIT Technical Standards for Trade Reporting The EDF Group Response

November Proposed IFRS Taxonomy Update Taxonomy/2017/3. IFRS Taxonomy Annual Improvements. Comments to be received by 29 January 2018

The IFRS Taxonomy. Today and tomorrow. International Financial Reporting Standards. Il Seminario Central de Balances y XBRL - 22 June 2011

Impact of the European Single Electronic Format on the IFRS annual report. 10 th October 2018

Revised XBRL Filing Requirements And The BizFin x Filing System. Training Seminar

Part 2A of Form ADV: Firm Brochure

EIOPA update on Insurance and Pension Funds & ECB add-ons for integrated reporting. Copyright 2018 EIOPA

DSB Q&A Document December 2017

XBRL UK Detailed Tagging Information

EMIR Revised Technical standards

Loan Party Profile Notifications

Corporate Actions in direct holding markets. T2S Info Session Helsinki, January 17, 2013 Christine Strandberg T2S CASG

Razor Risk Market Risk Overview

EMC Publishing s Personal Finance, A Lifetime Responsibility Correlated to South Carolina s PERSONAL FINANCE Standards. pp.

Enterprise Performance Management. Performance Management Solutions Training Catalog

Finance Advanced in Microsoft Dynamics NAV 2013

Global Forum Athens 21st October 2008 Interoperability and trust in the financial world

Streamlining IFRS reporting with XBRL Wednesday 28 October, Montreal

DRAFT WORKING DOCUMENT ON TARGET2-SECURITIES THE FUNCTIONAL ARCHITECTURE

Transcription:

Corporate Actions Taxonomy XBRL US Corporate Actions Taxonomy 2012 Scope Version 1.1 March 31, 2012 Prepared by: Phillip Engel Chief Data Architect XBRL US, Inc. Campbell Pryde Chief Executive Officer XBRL US, Inc. i

Corporate Actions Taxonomy Scope 2012 Final 2012-03-31 This Version: CA-Scope-FINAL.docx Table of Contents Table of Contents... ii 1 Introduction... 1 1.1 Deliverables Included... 1 1.2 Deliverables to be Included... 1 2 Overview of the Taxonomy... 2 2.1 Tagging Using Structure... 2 2.1.1 Capturing the details of the Entire Event... 3 2.1.2 Event Level Data... 3 2.1.3 Event Agents... 4 2.1.4 Event Options... 4 2.1.5 Payouts... 5 2.1.6 Additional Information... 5 ii

1 Introduction The Corporate Actions Taxonomy is intended for use by all issuers globally. The Taxonomy currently includes multiple templates or entry points that represent different combinations of events, jurisdictions, security types and shareholder elections. The first public release of the Corporate Actions taxonomy is primarily configured with templates for the United States Market but includes a large number of tags that are applicable to other jurisdictions. In the Phase 2 release of the Taxonomy, the scope of the entry points will be expanded to include all major jurisdictions, equity types and international events. The Corporate Actions Taxonomy includes all ISO 20022 defined events and a number of additional events that are specific to the US. As part of a Phase 2 release of the taxonomy, corporate action events that are specific to other jurisdictions will also be included so that all types of corporate action events can be captured accurately. The Taxonomy currently supports English labels (US and UK) and will be expanded in Phase 2 to incorporate additional languages based on support from various jurisdictions. The Taxonomy includes mapping information that allows a user to covert an XBRL instance into an ISO 20022 message. Not all information in the ISO 20022 message is included in this release of the Corporate Action Taxonomy. The Taxonomy is limited only to information that an Issuer could be expected to report to the market. For this reason, information that is specific to custodians and depositories is not included in the Taxonomy. In addition, the Taxonomy includes information that may not be used by a custodian or depository. This includes information such as tax information and documentation information. 1.1 Deliverables Included The Corporate Actions Taxonomy package includes the following: Corporate Actions Taxonomy Corporate Actions Taxonomy Package Combined ISO 20022 Taxonomy and Corporate Actions Taxonomy ISO 20022 Schema represented as an XBRL Taxonomy XBRL Mapping File between the ISO 20022 Schema and XBRL Taxonomy o XBRL generic linkbase o Excel Spreadsheet Architecture Document Sample Instance Files for ADR dividend payments XML Entry point file Event Hierarchy Represented as an XML file XSLT style sheet to convert an XBRL instance to an ISO 20022 message. ISO 20022 Extension Envelope Schema 1.2 Deliverables to be Included XBRL US will be preparing the following deliverables over the next year and will make them available as they are completed: Issuer Preparers Guide Sample instance documents for every corporate action event 1

2 Overview of the Taxonomy The Corporate Actions Taxonomy has a number of entry points that are specific to different event types, jurisdictions, security types and shareholder elections. Depending on which entry point the user selects, they will see only those tags that are appropriate to the Corporate Action that they are reporting on. In addition, an issuer can see all the tags in the Taxonomy. This allows an issuer to amend a standard corporate action event to tailor it to specific peculiarities of the event. The Taxonomy has hundreds of entry points that are created to match common corporate action scenarios. These include event types such as dividends, markets such as the United States, security types such as equities, and security holder election classifications such as mandatory and voluntary. It is important to note that these are common event types and does not limit the use of the Corporate Actions Taxonomy only for these events. Custom corporate action events can be defined using the Taxonomy by defining a custom template for a specific purpose. It is anticipated that different jurisdictions, or even issuers, define their own entry points to capture the nuances of a specific event type. Prior to creating an instance document, the issuer needs to determine the parameters of the corporate action. Specifically, what is the event, what market is the action to occur in, what type of securities are impacted and what choices does the issuer require the shareholder to make, if any. Depending on the answer to these four questions, the issuer will use a different entry point. The Corporate Actions Taxonomy is published with an XML file that details these options and the associated entry point. This XML file is to be used by software tools to direct the issuer to an appropriate entry point in a specific tagging tool. For more details on the technical design and architecture, refer the Corporate Actions Taxonomy Architecture Document. 2.1 Tagging Using Structure The Corporate Actions Taxonomy is structured in a hierarchy that allows an issuer a great deal of flexibility in tagging corporate action information. There are multiple levels in the hierarchy that support tagging recurring concepts. The Corporate Actions Taxonomy data structure is represented in Figure 1. 2

Figure 1 Taxonomy Structure Entity, Document and Event Level Event Details Data Shareholder Options (Elections) Level Option Data 1 Option Data 2 Option Data (n) Payout Level Payout Data 1 Payout Data 2 Payout Data (n) 2.1.1 Capturing the details of the Entire Event At the top of the Corporate Actions Taxonomy is an element called Corporate Action Event [Text Block]. This tag is used to capture, in HTML format, the complete text of the event as filed with the custodian or SEC. 2.1.2 Event Level Data Event Level Data is information that is specific to the entire event and only appears once in the XBRL instance. This is information that will remain constant regardless of how many shareholder options or payouts are available. For example, Event Level Data covers the details of the event itself, such as the securities impacted and dates related to the event. It does not include information about the options available to shareholders or consideration details applicable to the security holder. These are detailed in Levels 2 and 3. Event Information includes information about the following. 2.1.2.1 General Details This covers high level information about the event such as the event type, information about the issuer, the security impacted and the status of the event. 2.1.2.2 Underlying Security Details This category provides the fields that allow the issuer to detail the security that is impacted by the corporate action event. This is modeled as a two dimensional table that allows the issuer to identify one or many securities impacted by the event to be identified {Underlying Securities Impacted}. In addition, it allows the issuer to identify the details of the security including multiple identifiers such as ISIN and CUSIP for the same security. 2.1.2.3 Intermediate Security Details This is generally used for rights and/or warrants issues. For example, an issuer declares a rights issue on Stock A (the Underlying Security). The details of the actual rights issue is captured in the intermediate security. These may or may not have a CUSIP assigned. The issuer should not make up a CUSIP in this case. The Taxonomy includes a number of fields that allows the issuer to report on the characteristics of the right or warrant. 3

2.1.2.4 Dates All dates associated with the terms of the event. 2.1.2.5 Amounts and Rates Details amounts and rates associated with the event. These items only appear once in an event. 2.1.2.6 Event Indicators This allows the issuer to express conditions of the event such as dissenters rights. 2.1.2.7 Shareholders Meeting Details Information about shareholders meetings including dates and time is reported in this section. 2.1.2.8 Event Conditions Any conditions about the event are reported in this section. This is a text field that supports reporting conditions that are not covered by the Taxonomy. 2.1.3 Event Agents This section of the Taxonomy allows the issuer to detail the agents involved in the corporate action event. The issuer can indicate the issuer type and their contact details. 2.1.4 Event Options A shareholder can be presented with a number of options (or elections) to select for a corporate action. The Taxonomy allows the issuer to describe one or more options as part of a single corporate action event. For example, in a merger the shareholder may have the option to take stock in the acquiring entity or cash. These are described as two separate options. All the details associated with each of these options are recorded in each option. Each option is distinguished as an integer typed dimension; i.e., Option1, Option2, etc. Each option can then have one or more payouts. In the merger example, there would be a single cash payout for Option1 and a security payout for Option2. Information about the payout is captured at the payout level. This is all the information related to the distribution to the shareholder. At a minimum there must be at least one option per corporate action event. A mandatory event, like a dividend distribution, will have one option and one payout. All mandatory events will only have one option. The event options section is used when the event has different options available to the holder of the securities. Typically the stockholder will have to choose certain conditions associated with the corporate actions event such as accepting stock or cash, accepting a rights issue, buying more stock, nominating tax deductions, etc. The Taxonomy is structured so that an issuer can add multiple options on a single event. In theory, a corporate action event can have unlimited options associated with it, though options will seldom exceed 10 or more. At the option level, the issuer must define the option type for every option associated with an event. The option type is an enumerated list such as cash, securities, buy, sell, retain, exercise, etc. 4

Every option has a default option if the shareholder does not choose an option. Where multiple exist, the default option is used. The issuer should indicate which is the default option, otherwise the first option will be selected. Note that an event can have just one option associated with it. Effectively the shareholder does not get a choice as it is the only option. For example, a cash dividend would only have one option. In a number of cases, options may have specific dates associated with them. For example, when does the option expire, during which dates can it be exercised, weather the option can be withdrawn, and what dates such a withdrawal can be performed by the issuer. The option may also have tax implications associated with it that are also expressed as part of the option. The Taxonomy allows the issuer to identify the tax impact associated with a given option in different tax jurisdictions. 2.1.5 Payouts Every option has a payout, and a payout cannot be defined without describing an option. There can be multiple payouts associated with a given option. Multiple payouts occur if different amounts are paid at different times, different types of compensation are paid to stockholders such as cash or securities, or the nature of the payout is different. However, all the payouts associated with one option are paid to the stockholder. Different payouts associated with an option are not alternative payouts. The payout section of the Corporate Actions Taxonomy provides fields to describe the details of a cash payout or a security payout. Note that a cash and security payout associated with an option should represent two separate payouts and should not be included in the one payout. The payout section also includes tax details that the issuer can disclose associated with the payout. 2.1.6 Additional Information The final part of the Corporate Actions Taxonomy is a section to detail any additional terms or restrictions associated with the corporate action event that is not covered in the issuers XBRL document that has an impact on shareholders. 5