An easier to understand version of Melitz (2003)

Similar documents
International Trade Lecture 14: Firm Heterogeneity Theory (I) Melitz (2003)

Product Di erentiation. We have seen earlier how pure external IRS can lead to intra-industry trade.

Economic Growth and Development : Exam. Consider the model by Barro (1990). The production function takes the

The E ciency Comparison of Taxes under Monopolistic Competition with Heterogenous Firms and Variable Markups

Class Notes on Chaney (2008)

2 Maximizing pro ts when marginal costs are increasing

Product Di erentiation: Exercises Part 1

Bailouts, Time Inconsistency and Optimal Regulation

ESSAYS ON TRADE LIBERALIZATION WITH FIRM HETEROGENEITY. Aleksandr Vashchilko. Dissertation. Submitted to the faculty of the

Some Notes on Timing in Games

EconS Micro Theory I 1 Recitation #7 - Competitive Markets

Department of Economics The Ohio State University Final Exam Answers Econ 8712

Econ Homework 4 - Answers ECONOMIC APPLICATIONS OF CONSTRAINED OPTIMIZATION. 1. Assume that a rm produces product x using k and l, where

Problem Set # Public Economics

Department of Economics The Ohio State University Midterm Questions and Answers Econ 8712

5. COMPETITIVE MARKETS

STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT ALBANY Department of Economics. Ph. D. Comprehensive Examination: Macroeconomics Spring, 2013

A Model of Trade with Ricardian Comparative Advantage and Intra-sectoral Firm Heterogeneity

Microeconomics I - Midterm

Answer: Let y 2 denote rm 2 s output of food and L 2 denote rm 2 s labor input (so

Microeconomics, IB and IBP

ECON Micro Foundations

Financial Fragility and the Exchange Rate Regime Chang and Velasco JET 2000 and NBER 6469

A Model of Trade with Ricardian Comparative Advantage and Intra-sectoral Firm Heterogeneity

The Margins of Export: An Integrated approach

Econ 277A: Economic Development I. Final Exam (06 May 2012)

Cournot with N rms (revisited)

Fiscal policy and minimum wage for redistribution: an equivalence result. Abstract

Macroeconomics 4 Notes on Diamond-Dygvig Model and Jacklin

Answers to Microeconomics Prelim of August 24, In practice, firms often price their products by marking up a fixed percentage over (average)

Working Paper Series. This paper can be downloaded without charge from:

1 Two Period Production Economy

Pharmaceutical Patenting in Developing Countries and R&D

2. Find the equilibrium price and quantity in this market.

Monopolistic Competition, Managerial Compensation, and the. Distribution of Firms in General Equilibrium

G + V = w wl + a r(assets) + c C + f (firms earnings) where w represents the tax rate on wages. and f represents the tax rate on rms earnings

Intermediation and the Nature of Trade Costs: Theory and Evidence

Trade on Markets. Both consumers' initial endowments are represented bythesamepointintheedgeworthbox,since

1. If the consumer has income y then the budget constraint is. x + F (q) y. where is a variable taking the values 0 or 1, representing the cases not

Keynesian Multipliers with Home Production

Department of Economics Shanghai University of Finance and Economics Intermediate Macroeconomics

1 Ozan Eksi, TOBB-ETU

Gains from Trade and Comparative Advantage

Answer for Homework 2: Modern Macroeconomics I

Melitz Model: Heterogenous Firm Model of Trade

1 Non-traded goods and the real exchange rate

1 Answers to the Sept 08 macro prelim - Long Questions

Innovation, Firm Dynamics, and International Trade

Revision Lecture. MSc Finance: Theory of Finance I MSc Economics: Financial Economics I

Exercises on chapter 4

1 Supply and Demand. 1.1 Demand. Price. Quantity. These notes essentially correspond to chapter 2 of the text.

Accounting for Patterns of Wealth Inequality

Wages. Helpman, Itskhoki, and Redding. In the end, very interested in how trade impacts the distribution of the pie.

Simple e ciency-wage model

Macroeconomics IV Problem Set 3 Solutions

EconS Firm Optimization

Econ 8602, Fall 2017 Homework 2

EconS Industrial Organization Assignment 6 Homework Solutions

1 Chapter 1: Economic growth

Chapters 1 & 2 - MACROECONOMICS, THE DATA

1. Money in the utility function (start)

EconS Micro Theory I 1 Recitation #9 - Monopoly

Financial Market Imperfections Uribe, Ch 7

The Role of Physical Capital

The Interaction and Sequencing of Policy Reforms

ECON 222, Spring 2009 Assignment #3, Answer Key

False. With a proportional income tax, let s say T = ty, and the standard 1

Upward Pricing Pressure formulations with logit demand and endogenous partial acquisitions

Dundee Discussion Papers in Economics

A Model of Trade Liberalization and Technology Adoption with Heterogeneous Firms

Department of Economics The Ohio State University Econ 805 Homework #3 Answers

1 Modern Macroeconomics

Intermediate Macroeconomics: Economics 301 Exam 1. October 4, 2012 B. Daniel

Homework # 8 - [Due on Wednesday November 1st, 2017]

GS/ECON 5010 Answers to Assignment 3 November 2005

Tari s, Taxes and Foreign Direct Investment

Answers to June 11, 2012 Microeconomics Prelim

GT CREST-LMA. Pricing-to-Market, Trade Costs, and International Relative Prices

An optimal redistribution scheme for trade gains

Problem Set (1 p) (1) 1 (100)

Introduction to Economic Analysis Fall 2009 Problems on Chapter 3: Savings and growth

Monetary Economics: Problem Set #6 Solutions

Macroeconomic Analysis on the Basis of Trade Theory: A Review Essay

II. Competitive Trade Using Money

Consumption, Investment and the Fisher Separation Principle

Endogenous Markups in the New Keynesian Model: Implications for In ation-output Trade-O and Optimal Policy

UCLA Department of Economics Ph. D. Preliminary Exam Micro-Economic Theory

Online Appendix for The E ect of Diversi cation on Price Informativeness and Governance

General Equilibrium Analysis Part II A Basic CGE Model for Lao PDR

1. Money in the utility function (continued)

Advanced Microeconomics Final Exam Winter 2011/2012

Economics 326: Pro t Maximization and Production. Ethan Kaplan

Market Reallocation and Knowledge Spillover: The Gains from Multinational Production

The Effect of Globalization in a Semi Endogenous Growth Model with Firm Heterogeneity, Endogenous International Spillover, and Trade

Universidad Carlos III de Madrid June Microeconomics Grade

3 General Equilibrium in a Competitive Market

NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES A GLOBAL VIEW OF PRODUCTIVITY GROWTH IN CHINA. Chang-Tai Hsieh Ralph Ossa

Inflation. David Andolfatto

Solutions to Midterm Exam. ECON Financial Economics Boston College, Department of Economics Spring Tuesday, March 19, 10:30-11:45am

WORKING PAPER NO DO SUNK COSTS OF EXPORTING MATTER FOR NET EXPORT DYNAMICS? George Alessandria Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia

Transcription:

n easier to understand version o Melitz (2003) Daniel Nguyen, University o Copenhagen International Trade, 2 December, 2008 This handout presents a very simpli ed version o Melitz (2003) that ocuses on a key mechanism: sel-selection into exporting by productivity. et s begin by presenting a closed economy version Closed economy continuum o rms produces varieties o a single good using the numeraire actor labor (wage is normalized to ). The endowment o labor is :. Demand Each in nitessimal rm produces a single, unique variety. Given the set o varieties supplied to the market, the consumer s utility unction is 2 where c denotes the quantity consumed o variety. The market is subject to the expenditure = income constraint: p c = 2 By maximizing the utility subject to the income constraint, we can construct the market demand or any variety as a unction o its price:.2 Supply c = c p R2 p Firms are idiosyncratically productive, meaning at birth they draw a parameter rom a distribution with pd g() over support (0; ) : To produce an output q, a rm requires l ( ) units o labor: l ( ) = q (2) The marginal cost o production is : Firms that draw higher are more productive in the sense that they have a lower marginal cost. Given rm 0 s demand unction () and cost unction (2), the rm will maximize pro ts by setting its price as a markup over marginal cost: p = (3) ( ) and garner revenues r ( ) o r ( ) = = 2 ()

determined by substituting equation (3) into () and recognizing that revenue r ( ) = p c : The variable is a measure o the competitiveness o the market: an larger re ects either more supplied varieties or higher productivities o existing varieties. Either way, rm 0 s revenues are lower as a result o higher. Subtracting its labor costs rom its revenues, a producing rm makes a supply pro t o ( ) = (4).3 Decision to supply Given rm 0 s draw o ; the rm will only choose to supply i ( ) > 0: Since ( ) is strictly increasing with and (0) =, there exists a unique such that ( ) = 0 (5) () > 08 > Equation 5 is the CUTOFF condition. Firms drawing < do not produce because it is not pro table to do so. Firms drawing will supply to the market and make nonnegative pro ts. Since is drawn rom a distribution with pd g() over support (0; ), this CUTOFF determines the set o goods supplied to the market and the market competiveness : = = Mg()d 2 where M is the endogenous mass o potential producers that draw. The cuto condition can now be rearranged as R g()d = M (6) relating the two endogenous variables M and :.4 Equilibrium I drawing costs nothing, then new rms will continuously ood the market. Firms drawing < will just exit, re-enter and draw another until they receive a pro tble draw. M will grow in nitely and unsolvably large. Instead, this economy requires a sunk cost o entry D: Think o D as the development cost or a new variety. With this additional cost, a rm s total pro t, as a unction o its productivity, is ( ( ) = D i (7) D i < To determine equilibrium, we must nd the rm s ex ante expected pro t. new rm pays D and a aces a probability R g()d o drawing a pro table : Otherwise, it exits without producing, paying only the development cost D: potential rm s expected pro t can be expressed as E [] = D g()d ( D) g()d (8) 2 0

In an economy where there is ree entry, rms will enter until E [] = 0 With this condition, expression (8)can be rearranged to R = M (9) g()d D This is the zero-expected-pro t condition. ike equation (5), it relates the two endogenous variables in this economy: the mass o entering rms M and the cuto productivity : The cuto and zeroexpected-pro t conditions can be solved to determine the unique solutions to M and : 2 Open economy. Suppose now that there are two countries, Home and Foreign( denotes a Foreign variable) with identical preerences, wages, and labor endowments. Home demand or a variety is now c = p R2\x p g where x is the set o varieties exported rom Foreign to Home. Similarly, x represents the set o varieties made in Home and sold in Foreign, and represents varieties made and sold in Foreign. Exporting involves additional xed and variable costs. For a Foreign based rm with productivity ; the labor requirement l x or exporting a quantity q x to the Home country is l x ( ) = q x where > is the iceberg transport costs o exporting. It still maximizes pro ts by charging a price equal to a constant markup over marginal cost and achieves export revenues o rx ( ) = (0) = () 2 x Note that now includes both domestic varieties and imported varieties. The Foreign rm makes an exporting supply pro t o 2 x ( ) = 2. Exporting Cuto We can now derive an exporting cuto condition similar to (5): x ( x ) = 0 (2) 3

where x is the cuto productivity or Foreign rms to supply to the Home market. Home rms domestic supply decisions are still governed by equation (5), except with our new de nition o market competiveness given by equation () : With the domestic and exporting cuto conditions, we can determine the set o varieties available to a home consumer: and determine the exact nature o : = x = : > x g = : > g Mg () d x M g () d We can repeat this exercise or a Home rm selling in the Foreign market. Since the two countries share identical labor endowments and wages, the Home market competiveness must equal to the oreign competitivenes : I not, all potential rms would simply locate in the market with a lower : Then, by Equation (2), = ) = ) x = x ) M = M That is, the cuto s and mass o entering rms are the same in both countries. The two countries are symmetrical and have identical aggregate market conditions. rm in either country supplies to its domestic market i > ; and exports to the other market i > x : The relationship between and x is determined by combining equations 5 and 2: x = (3) The exporting cuto is higher than the domestic cuto : only the most productive rms export. 2.2 Expected Pro ts Ex ante, rms developing new varieties now have a chance o drawing a productivity high enough to export. rm s total pro t, based on its draw, is now 8 >< D i x ( ) = D i < x (4) >: D i < new rm s expected pro t can be expressed as E [] = x x 0 ( D) g()d D g()d D g()d 4

Free Entry will reduce E [] to zero: E [] = 0 (5) 2.3 Equilibrium Equilibrium is de ned as the triplet ; x ; Mg such that. determines the domestic cuto via equation 5 2. x determines the exporting cuto via equation 2 3. The mass o incoming rms M reduces a new rm s expected pro ts E [] to zero via equation 5 5