Capital Markets Outlook 100 LOWDER BROOK DRIVE SUITE 1100 WESTWOOD MA FAX

Similar documents
PCA INVESTMENT MARKET RISK METRICS. Monthly Report

2014 CAPITAL MARKET ASSUMPTIONS. January SEATTLE LOS ANGELES

Investment Market Risk Metrics August 2011

PCA INVESTMENT MARKET RISK METRICS

PCA INVESTMENT MARKET RISK METRICS

San Francisco Retiree Health Care Trust Fund Education Materials on Public Equity

PCA INVESTMENT MARKET RISK METRICS. Monthly Report

Investment Market Risk Metrics April 2013

Capital Market Review

MAY 2018 Capital Markets Update

DECEMBER 2018 Capital Markets Update

ASSET ALLOCATION VIEWPOINTS

Summit Strategies Group 8182 Maryland Avenue, 6th Floor St. Louis, Missouri Monthly Economic & Capital Market Update

Global Market Overview

Asset Strategy Consultants. MARKET ENVIRONMENT Third Quarter 2016

First Quarter 2017 Investment Review. Prepared by: Meketa Investment Group CHICAGO, IL (312)

Asset Strategy Consultants. MARKET ENVIRONMENT Second Quarter 2016

Quarterly Asset Class Report Global Equity

OCTOBER 2018 Capital Markets Update

Eric C. Elbell, CFA, CAIA Area Senior Vice President. Kyongdo Min, CPA, CFA Area Vice President. April 11, 2018

Economic and Capital Market Update April 2018

Short exposure to US equities

Seven-year asset class forecast returns, 2015 update

Endowment Funds Performance (Year ending June 30 th, 2014)

University of Illinois. Fourth Quarter 2016 Investment Update Board Report. March University of Illinois

ASSET ALLOCATION REPORT

ACG Market Review. Second Quarter Global Highlights: Economy Announced tariffs have so far failed to slow down economic activity

Summit Strategies Group 8182 Maryland Avenue, 6th Floor St. Louis, Missouri Monthly Economic & Capital Market Update

INVESTMENT PLAN. Sample Client. For. May 04, Prepared by : Sample Advisor Financial Consultant.

Retirement Funds. SEMIANNual REPORT

Economic Outlook. DMS Economic Outlook for next 12 months

2016: THE YEAR OF TRANSITIONS

2018 TEN-YEAR CAPITAL MARKET ASSUMPTIONS

Global Market Analysis Spring 2014

Investment Research Team Update

Asset Strategy Consultants. MARKET ENVIRONMENT First Quarter 2017

Montana Board of Investments. CEM Benchmarking Results

2017 Review & Outlook

Commercial Real Estate s Correlation to Other Asset Classes June 2015

Target Funds. SEMIANNual REPORT

Texas Tech University System

Rethink your income strategy

Vanguard economic and market outlook for 2018: Rising risks to the status quo. Vanguard Research December 2017

MARCH 2018 Capital Markets Update

Economic and Financial Markets Monthly Review & Outlook Detailed Report. June 2014

Quantitative Review of U.S. Equities Second Quarter 2018

Weekly Market Commentary

Market Insight Economy and Asset Classes December Oil Prices Downtrending: The Real Global Economic Stimulus

ESTABLISHING A RISK CULTURE AMONG INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS. San Diego County Employees Retirement Association. August 2013

Summit Strategies Group 8182 Maryland Avenue, 6th Floor St. Louis, Missouri

Capital Markets Review First Quarter 2015

Summit Strategies Group 8182 Maryland Avenue, 6th Floor St. Louis, Missouri

Retirement System Pension Plan Investment Performance Review Quarter Ended June 30, 2014

Outlook & Perspective

Fixed Income Solutions

Economic Outlook. DMS Economic Outlook for next 12 months

Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Funds

GIPS List of Composite Descriptions

Fixed Income Perspective: Treasury Inflation Protected Securities

City of Hollywood Employees' Retirement Fund Preliminary Market Value Update as of August 31, 2017

KP Retirement Path 2050 Fund: KPRHX. KP Retirement Path 2055 Fund: KPRIX. KP Retirement Path 2060 Fund: KPRJX. KP Large Cap Equity Fund: KPLCX

2017 Capital Market Projections. Alaska Retirement Management Board. March 2, Paul Erlendson Senior Vice President

CLOSER LOOK DOMESTIC FIXED INCOME

SEPTEMBER 2018 Capital Markets Update

The Bull Market: Six Years Old And Not Over

Summit Strategies Group 8182 Maryland Avenue, 6th Floor St. Louis, Missouri Economic & Capital Market Review

Quarterly Update. Jessica Burbrink, CFP, CTFA. Clayton Bill, CFA. Kathy Clark. Andrew Heck, JD, CTFA, CFIRS

Economic and Financial Markets Monthly Review & Outlook Detailed Report January 2018

City of Fort Walton Beach, Florida Beal Memorial Cemetery Perpetual Care Fund

Sherpa Investment View 4 th Quarter 2015

Endowment Funds Performance (Year ending Sept 30 th, 2014)

Summit Strategies Group 8182 Maryland Avenue, 6th Floor St. Louis, Missouri

ASSET ALLOCATION VIEWPOINTS AND GLOBAL INVESTMENT ENVIRONMENT

Introducing BlackRock's Target Allocation ETF Models

Q MARKETS REVIEW

Portfolio Discussions

10-Year Capital Market Return Assumptions Calendar Year 2016

Fresno County Employees Retirement Association

Table 1: Economic Growth Measures

Fund Structure Trustee Educational Seminar. You re a New Trustee. Now What?

Summit Strategies Group 8182 Maryland Avenue, 6th Floor St. Louis, Missouri Economic & Capital Market Review

Wealth Management Outlook 1 st Quarter 2018

TEL FAX cookstreetconsulting.com

F U N D E V A L U A T I O N R E P O R T

Pension Investment Review as of September 30, 2017

Returns among non-us equity markets were even higher. The MSCI World ex USA Index, which reflects non-us

UWINCO Board Update and Investment Performance Quarterly Report Quarter Ended September 30, 2017

Value versus Growth: History Stands on the Side of Value Investing

The increasing importance of multi asset solutions genuine diversification to reduce total risk

Economic and Financial Markets Monthly Review & Outlook Detailed Report October 2017

Why Active Now in U.S. Large-Cap Equity

Convertible Bonds: A Tool for More Efficient Portfolios

Emerging Markets Debt: Outlook for the Asset Class

FIXED INCOME STRATEGIES FOR LATE 2017 NAVIGATING UNCHARTERED TERRITORY, RISING RATES, AND YOUR FIXED INCOME PORTFOLIO

FIVE KEYS TO EMERGING MARKET OUTLOOK John Lynch Chief Investment Strategist, LPL Financial Jeffrey Buchbinder, CFA Equity Strategist, LPL Financial

NOVEMBER 2018 Capital Markets Update

Five investment themes for 2014

Semiannual Report December 31, 2017

Investment Strategy: Strategic Themes and Tactical Positioning

May 2015 FINANCIAL MARKET REVIEW

Transcription:

M E K E T A I N V E S T M E N T G R O U P 00 LOWDER BROOK DRIVE SUITE 00 WESTWOOD MA 02090 78 47 3500 FAX 78 47 34

Investors are faced with three primary issues in the near-term: ) historically low bond yields, 2) the potential for a transition into a rising rate environment, and 3) the potential for deteriorating corporate earnings. The price of the U.S. stock market relative to ten-year average earnings increased slightly from the beginning of the year, remaining above its historical average (28.9x versus 2.6x). Small cap domestic stocks remain richly priced relative to large cap stocks. Developed international and emerging market stocks are trading at lower valuations than U.S. stocks. Sovereign debt issues and weak economic growth in Europe, and a cyclical slowdown in emerging economies, are weighing down valuations. Uncertainties around global demand (particularly from emerging markets), stimulative monetary policy, and geopolitical tensions could cause heightened volatility despite a recent lull in turbulence. In particular, the monetary policy changes by central banks are having a meaningful impact on most markets. At the end of, the spreads for both high yield corporate bonds (3.4% versus 5.5%) and investment grade bonds (.0% versus.5%) were below their long-term averages. At 2.5%, the yield on the ten-year Treasury remained far below its post-wwii average of 5.7%. Low yields on fixed income instruments are likely to push long-term investors further out on the risk spectrum as they seek to achieve their target returns, while short-term investors may look to cash for safety. Sources: Thomson Reuters, U.S. Treasury, Standard & Poor s. Data is as of 30,. 2

The U.S. Cyclically Adjusted P/E and Long Term Equity Returns Shiller CAPE 45 40 35 30 25 20 5 0 5 Shiller CAPE Seven Year Forward Return -0% -5% 0% 5% 0% 5% 20% Annualized Seven Year Forward Return (Reverse Scale) 0 25% 926 929 933 937 94 945 949 952 956 960 964 968 972 975 979 983 987 99 995 998 2002 2006 200 One of the most powerful predictors of long term equity returns has been the Cyclically Adjusted Price to Earnings Ratio (CAPE), which was originally proposed by Robert Shiller. This fundamentally driven measure is highly correlated with future returns which are shown in the chart above with seven year forward returns on a reverse scale. Source: Robert Shiller s website and Morningstar Direct. Data is from January 3, 926 to 30,. 3

U.S. Equity Cyclically Adjusted P/E 55 50 45 40 Price to Earnings Ratio 35 30 25 20 + Std. Dev. Post WWII Average = 2.6 28.9 5 0 - Std. Dev. 5 0 946 950 954 958 963 967 97 975 980 984 988 992 997 200 2005 2009 The cyclically adjusted P/E ratio for the S&P 500 finished at 28.9x, above its post-wwii average of 2.6x. Recent strong performance has driven this valuation measure well past its long-term average. While still not at extreme levels, it is not likely that this type of price appreciation can continue indefinitely. Source: Standard & Poor s. Earnings figures represent the average of monthly as reported earnings over the previous ten years. Data is from January 3, 946 to 30,. 4

Small Cap P/E vs. Large Cap P/E 30% 20% + Std. Dev. Large stocks cheaper 22% 0% Average = 00% 00% 90% 80% - Std. Dev. 70% 60% Small stocks cheaper 50% 99 993 995 997 999 200 2003 2005 2007 2009 200 202 The P/E ratio of small cap stocks (Russell 2000) relative to large cap stocks (Russell 000) remains more than one standard deviation above its long-term average, signaling potential underperformance of small cap stocks relative to large cap stocks. Source: Russell Investments. Earnings figures represent 2-month as reported earnings. Data is as of 30,. 5

Growth P/E vs. Value P/E 370% 364% 320% Value stocks attractive 270% 220% 70% + Std. Dev. Average = 48% 20% 35% 70% - Std. Dev. Growth stocks attractive 20% 99 993 995 997 999 200 2003 2005 2007 2009 200 202 The P/E ratio of growth stocks (Russell 3000 Growth) relative to value stocks (Russell 3000 Value) finished at 35%, well above its level four years prior, but still below its long-term average. Of note, the long-term average was sharply influenced by the technology bubble of the late 990s. Source: Russell Investments. Earnings figures represent 2-month as reported earnings. Data is as of 30,. 6

Developed International Equity Cyclically Adjusted P/E 50 45 40 35 Price to Earnings Ratio 30 25 20 5 + Std. Dev. - Std. Dev. Average = 22.2 6.8 0 5 0 986 990 994 998 2002 2006 200 Valuations (for the MSCI EAFE (ex-japan) remain approximately one standard deviation cheaper than their historical average. Sovereign debt concerns and the slow-to-negative pace of economic growth in Europe likely account for the low valuation levels. Source: MSCI and Thomson Reuters. Earnings figures represent the average of monthly as reported earnings over the previous ten years. Data is as of 30,. 7

Emerging Market Equity Cyclically Adjusted P/E 50 45 40 Price to Earnings Ratio 35 30 25 20 5 + Std. Dev. - Std. Dev. Average = 23.2 5.8 0 5 0 2005 2007 2008 2009 200 202 203 Emerging market equities (MSCI Emerging Markets) are priced more than one standard deviation below their (brief) historical average. By this metric, emerging market equities are trading at a much lower valuation than U.S. equities, and at a slightly lower valuation than non-u.s. developed market equities. Source: MSCI and Thomson Reuters. Earnings figures represent the average of monthly as reported earnings over the previous ten years. Data is as of 30,. 8

Ten-Year Treasury Yields 6% 4% 2% 0-Year Treasury 0% 8% 6% Post WWII Average = 5.7% 4% 2.5% 2% 0% 946 95 956 96 967 972 977 982 988 993 998 2003 2009 Ten-year Treasury yields were 2.5% at the end of, meaningfully above their level at the end of 202, but well below their post-wwii average. The decision from the Federal Reserve to begin tapering off quantitative easing was one of the causes of the increase in rates. Source: U.S. Treasury. Data is as of 30,. 9

Ten-Year Breakeven Inflation 3.8% 3.6% 3.4% 3.2% 3.0% 2.8% 2.6% + Std. Dev. Average = 2.% 2.4% 2.2% 2.0%.8%.6%.4% - Std. Dev..2% Low inflation expectations.0% 0.8% 0.6% 0.4% 0.2% 0.0% 997 998 999 2000 200 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 200 20 202 203 2.3% Breakeven (or expected) inflation, the difference between the nominal yield on a ten-year Treasury and the real yield on a ten-year TIPS, was close to its historical average at the end of. The most recent inflation rate year over year was 2.%. This means actual inflation has been 0.2% below the ten-year breakeven inflation rate. Source: U.S. Treasury and Federal Reserve. Data is as of 30, for TIPS and Treasuries. Inflation is measured by the Consumer Price Index (CPI-U) for which the most recent data point is from May 30. 0

Credit Spreads 20% 8% U.S. Investment Grade Corporates U.S. High Yield 8.3% 6% 4% 2% 0% 8% High Yield Average = 5.5% 6% 4% Inv. Grade Average =.5% 2% 0% Jan-97 Jan-99 Jan-0 Jan-03 Jan-05 Jan-07 Jan-09 Jan- Jan-3 3.4%.0% Jun-4 Credit spreads (versus U.S. Treasury bonds) for both high yield and investment grade corporate bonds finished below their respective historical averages. With both spreads close to the bottom quartile mark the search for yield continues to become more difficult and complacency about risk remains a concern. Source: Barclays Capital. High Yield is proxied by the Barclays High Yield index and Investment Grade Corporates are proxied by the Barclays U.S. Corporate Investment Grade index. Data is as of 30,.

$,800 Credit Quality Corporate Bond Issuance Investment Grade High Yield $,600 $,400 Dollar Issuance (USD Billions) $,200 $,000 $800 $600 $400 $200 $- 996 997 998 999 2000 200 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 200 20 202 203 e The chart above shows that High Yield Bond Issuance has grown much faster than Investment Grade Bond Issuance in recent years. The current proportion of High Yield Issuance is near historic highs. With rates near historic lows companies have increased their bond issuance with lower quality issues increasing at a faster rate the average quality of bonds is on the decline. Source: SIFMA research. Data is as of 30,. 2

Emerging Markets Local Currency vs. U.S. High Yield 45% Barclays Emerging Markets World (Local Currency) Barclays High Yield 40% 35% Annual Yield 30% 25% 20% 5% 0% 5% 0% 993 994 995 996 997 998 999 2000 200 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 200 20 202 203 With yield becoming harder to find in fixed income markets that seem expensive across the spectrum, one asset class that stands out is Emerging Market Local Currency. When compared with the current yield on U.S. High Yield bonds, the last period when the spread remained at these levels was 200. Source: Barclays Capital. High Yield is proxied by the Barclays High Yield index and Emerging Markets Local Currency is proxied by the Barclays Emerging Markets Local Currency index. Data is as of 30,. 3

Core Real Estate vs. REITs 5% 4% 3% 2% + Std. Dev. Average=.6% Core RE relatively attractive 2.7% % 0% - Std. Dev. -% REITs relatively attractive -2% 982 986 990 994 998 2002 2006 200 At the end of, the spread between core real estate cap rates and REIT yields was 2.7%, which continues on a downward trend toward its long-term average. REITs were yielding 3.8% at the end of, well below the 0.% level of early 2009. Sources: Thomson Reuters and NCREIF. Core Real Estate is proxied by the transaction-based cap rate for the NCREIF NPI index and REITs are proxied by the yield for the NAREIT Equity index. NPI transactional capitalization rates are calculated on a quarterly basis and lagged in their release. Data is as of March 3,, for the NCREIF NPI and 30,, for the NAREIT Equity index. 4

Core Real Estate Spread vs. Ten-Year Treasury 6% 5% 5.% 5.% 4% 3% Average=2.9% 4.0% 2% % 0% 0.3% -% 990 993 996 999 2002 2005 2008 20 At 4.0%, the difference between the 6.5% cap rate for core real estate and the 2.5% yield for the ten-year Treasury remains elevated but has come down substantially toward the long term average. Still, the absolute level of core real estate cap rates is near a historical low. Source: NCREIF, U.S. Treasury. NPI transactional capitalization rates are calculated on a quarterly basis. The 30, NCREIF NPI data is not yet available. Data is as of March 3,, for the NCREIF NPI and 30,, for the ten-year Treasury. 5

REITs Dividend Yield Spread vs. Ten-Year Treasury 8% 7.2% 6% 4% 2% Average = 0.0%.2% 0% -2% -.4% -4% -6% -6.7% -8% 980 982 984 986 988 990 992 994 996 998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 200 202 REIT yield spreads were.2% at the end of. As the recovery in the real estate market continues, this spread is trending closer to its long term average. As with core real estate, the absolute level of REIT dividend yields is near a historical low. Source: NAREIT, U.S. Treasury. REITs are proxied by the yield for the NAREIT Equity index. Data is as of 30,. 6

Long-Term 2 0 Expected Return (%) 8 6 4 2 0 Cash Bonds TIPS High Yield Hedge Funds Commodities Core Real Estate EM Bonds Infrastructure US Equity EAFE Equity Natural Resources Private Equity EM Equity Based on Meketa Investment Group s long term expectations, only a handful of asset classes are priced to produce returns above 8% per year. All of these asset classes incorporate a high degree of volatility. Twenty-year expected returns based upon Meketa Investment Group s Annual Asset Study. 7

Total Return Comparison of Barclays U.S. Aggregate Minus Barclays U.S. TIPS Changes In Rates (bps) -00-50 0 50 00 4.0% -4.6% -2.97% -2.03% -.36% -0.94% Inflation Rate Scenarios 3.0% -3.6% -.97% -.03% -0.36% 0.06% 2.0% -2.6% -0.97% -0.03% 0.64%.06%.0% -.6% 0.03% 0.97%.64% 2.06% 0.0% -0.6%.03%.97% 2.64% 3.06% Total Return Scenario: 00 bps Rate Increase and 2% Inflation Total Return Over Longer Holding Periods Year 3 Year 5 Year 7 Year 0 Year Barclays U.S. Aggregate -3.38% 0.93%.8% 2.20% 2.48% Barclays U.S. Treasury U.S. TIPS -4.44% 0.57%.6% 2.05% 2.39% Data is as of 30, via Barclays, Bloomberg, and Thomson Reuters. 8

Total Return Given Changes in Interest Rates (bps) 6% Barclays U.S. Short Treasury (Cash) Barclays U.S. Treasury -3 Yr. Barclays U.S. Treasury Intermediate 4% 2% 0% -2% -00-50 0 50 00 50 200 250 300-4% -6% -8% -0% Total Return for Given Changes in Interest Rates (bps) Statistics -00-50 0 50 00 50 200 250 300 Duration YTW Barclays U.S. Short Treasury (Cash) 0.% -0.2% -0.4% -0.6% -0.8% -.% -.3% 0.45 0.07% Barclays U.S. Treasury -3 Yr..5% 0.5% -0.4% -.4% -2.4% -3.3% -4.2% -5.2%.97 0.53% Barclays U.S. Treasury Intermediate 5.0% 3.%.2% -0.6% -2.4% -4.2% -5.9% -7.5% -9.% 3.74.20% Barclays U.S. Treasury Long 2.7% 2.0% 3.2% -4.6% -.4% -7.4% -22.4% -26.4% -29.5% 6.55 3.23% Data represents the expected total return from a given change in interest rates (shown in basis points) over a 2-month period assuming a parallel shift in rates. Data is as of 30, via Barclays and Thomson Reuters. 9