Appointed Actuary Symposium 2007 Solvency II Update

Similar documents
An Introduction to Solvency II

Life 2008 Spring Meeting June 16-18, Session 14, Key Issues Arising from Solvency II. Moderator Marc Slutzky, FSA, MAAA

Solvency II Interpreting the key principles

ALM in a Solvency II World. Craig McCulloch

The Solvency II project and the work of CEIOPS

Society of Actuaries in Ireland Solvency II for Beginners. Mike Frazer. 19 May 2011

Karel VAN HULLE. Head of Unit, Insurance and Pensions, DG Markt, European Commission

Solvency II: Implementation Challenges & Experiences Learned

SOLVENCY ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT (SAM) FRAMEWORK

European insurers in the starting blocks

Valuation Problems in Models for Solvency II. Workshop report IP/A/ECON/WS/ PE Directorate-General for Internal Policies

Solvency II. Yannis Pitaras IACPM Brussels, 15 May 2009

ERM Concepts and Framework. Paul Duffy

MARKET CONSISTENT VALUATION UNDER THE SOLVENCY II DIRECTIVE

Solvency II Update. Craig McCulloch

Introduction to Solvency II SCR Standard Formula for Market Risk. Erik Thoren 11 June 2015

RISK BASED CAPITAL AND SOLVENCY

COVER NOTE TO ACCOMPANY THE DRAFT QIS5 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS

April 2007 CEIOPS-FS-11/07

The Society of Actuaries in Ireland

Risk Based Capital Solvency 2

LONGEVITY SWAPS. Impact of Solvency II AN EFFECTIVE, INNOVATIVE WAY TO MANAGE THE LONGEVITY RISK. Presenter: Tom O Sullivan, F.S.A, F.C.I.A, M.A.A.A.

International Regulatory Developments

Solvency II. New Rules in Europe for the Insurance Industry. Lecture at UConn Law, January 28, 2013

QIS5 Workshop. Warsaw, 5 October 2010

Solvency II Update. Latest developments and industry challenges (Session 10) Réjean Besner

Life under Solvency II Be prepared!

Feedback on Solvency II Draft Directive

Solvency II and the Work of CEIOPS

Solvency II. Insurance and Pensions Unit, European Commission

Reinsurance cessions in 2012: Set to rise or fall? The impact of reinsurance on risk capital

1. INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE

Christos Patsalides President Cyprus Association of Actuaries

Understanding the prudential balance sheet. Lars Dieckhoff Principal expert Solvency II

Solvency II, messages and findings from QIS 5. Carlos Montalvo Rebuelta Executive Director Brussels, 7 March 2011

29th India Fellowship Seminar

QIS5 Consultation Feedback: High Level Issues

The Omnibus II Directive

Undertaking-specific parameters (USPs)

Hong Kong RBC First Quantitative Impact Study

Solvency II overview

Understanding the prudential balance sheet. Lars Dieckhoff Principal expert Solvency II

1. INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE

Technical Specification on the Long Term Guarantee Assessment (Part I)

Solvency Assessment and Management (SAM) Roadmap

A Comparison of Solvency Systems: US and EU

1. INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE 2. DEFINITIONS

Solvency II Insights for North American Insurers. CAS Centennial Meeting Damon Paisley Bill VonSeggern November 10, 2014

Recent Solvency II Developments for European Life Insurers and Hannover Life Re. Dr. Wolf S. Becke CEO Hannover Life Re

A (personal) view. Philip Whittingham, European Chief Enterprise Risk Officer. 22 March 2010

Technical Specification for the Preparatory Phase (Part I)

Solvency Assessment and Management (SAM)

Solvency Regulation in the UAE: A Benchmark and Impact Study

Solvency II The Global Insurance Financial Trojan Horse. Les Boughner EVP & Managing Director Willis Captive & Consulting Practice

[ALL FACTORS USED IN THIS DOCUMENT ARE ILLUSTRATIVE AND DO NOT PRE-EMPT A SEPARATE DISCUSSION ON CALIBRATION]

Initial comments on the Proposal for a Solvency II framework Directive (COM (2007) 361 of 10 July

EIOPA: recent developments in insurance and pensions. EVCA Investors' Forum Geneva, 14 March 2012

Solvency II The Potential Impact

SOLVENCY II Level 2 Implementing Measures

CEIOPS-DOC-06/06. November 2006

January CNB opinion on Commission consultation document on Solvency II implementing measures

What do you know about Solvency II? High-level introduction for interested parties from Non-EU regions February 2013

REQUEST TO EIOPA FOR TECHNICAL ADVICE ON THE REVIEW OF THE SOLVENCY II DIRECTIVE (DIRECTIVE 2009/138/EC)

Results of the QIS5 Report

'SOLVENCY II': Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Development of Risk Based Capital Framework in Singapore. Questor Ng, Raymond Cheung Singapore Actuarial Society

Solvency II - Risk Management Strategies for Insurance Businesses

Risk management framework Under Solvency II

Solvency II - Risk Management Strategies for Insurance Businesses

Challenger Life Company Limited Comparability of capital requirements across different regulatory regimes

Lessons from the ICAS regime for UK insurers

Solvency II, linking risk with capital

IMPACT OF REINSURANCE ON RISK CAPITAL

Preparing for Solvency II Theoretical and Practical issues in Building Internal Economic Capital Models Using Nested Stochastic Projections

Capital Adequacy and Supervisory Assessment of Solvency Position

Solvency II Standard Formula: Consideration of non-life reinsurance

Project Solvency II Rolf Stölting

April 2014 Summary of technical specifications for QIS 1. Singapore RBC 2 Review

Agile Capital Modelling. Contents

MAIF s contribution to CEIOPS s Consultation Papers n 19 and 20

Solvency II. Making it workable for all. January 2011

Solvency II Detailed guidance notes

Hot Topic: Understanding the implications of QIS5

Judging the appropriateness of the Standard Formula under Solvency II

From Solvency I to Solvency II: a new era for capital requirements in insurance?

Solvency II and Pension Funds. Instituto de seguros de Portugal 25 Oct Lisbon

Disclosure of Market Consistent Embedded Value as of March 31, 2016

2013 Conference Risk, Recovery & Real Growth" 23rd Annual CAA Conference Secrets Wild Orchid Montego Bay, Jamaica. 4 th to 6 th December 2013

QIS5 planning. 26 August 2010 Page 2

Christina Urias SMI Task Force Chair Director, Arizona Department of Insurance

Results of the QIS5 Report Short Version

2.1 Pursuant to article 18D of the Act, an authorised undertaking shall, except where otherwise provided for, value:

PRA Solvency II update James Orr. 29 April 2015

Solvency II dragging Australia into Europe once again

Growing the Value Capital & Risk Management

Solvency Assessment and Management: Pillar 2 - Sub Committee ORSA and Use Test Task Group Discussion Document 35 (v 3) Use Test

Quantification of ORSA in the context of health insurance

ABSTRACT 1. INTRODUCTION

ORSA An International Development

BERMUDA MONETARY AUTHORITY

Transcription:

watsonwyatt.com Appointed Actuary Symposium 2007 Solvency II Update Naomi Burger 7 November 2007

Agenda Overview Pillar 1 - Capital requirements Pillar 2 - Supervisory review Pillar 3 - Disclosure Conclusions 2

The existing solvency regime In place since First EU Directive in 1970s Only sets very high level requirements which are implemented in more detail by local regulations Issues Lack of harmonisation across Europe Doesn t necessarily reflect underlying risk exposures Lack of alignment between risk and capital requirements (e.g. no allowance for diversification) Limited incentive for good risk management Solvency II project initiated in 2000 3

How is Solvency II being developed? Lamfalussy process European Parliament and Council of Ministers Consultation/influence: -CRO Forum -CEA (ABI) -IASB -IAIS -Group Consultatif EU Commission (internal Markets Division) / EIOPC (UK Treasury) Calls for advice CEIOPS (FSA) Proposals must be accompanied by impact assessment 4

Current Solvency II timeline Timetable 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 QIS3 QIS4 Framework Directive QIS5 Implementing measures Recent developments QIS3 completed Draft framework directive published Updated timetable CEIOPS advice on groups Advice on MCR, SCR etc Shadow application 5

Agenda Overview Pillar 1 - Capital requirements Pillar 2 - Supervisory review Pillar 3 - Disclosure Conclusions 6

Pillar 1 Basic structure Inadmissible assets/ ineligible capital Eligible capital Market value of assets Free Capital Adjusted SCR MV liabilities (hedgeable) SCR MCR Supervisory capital add-on Solvency Capital Requirement Minimum Capital Requirement Risk margin (CoC approach) Best estimate liability (nonhedgeable) Technical provisions Other liabilities 7

Solvency II - Asset valuation Tradable assets at market value Non-tradable assets "valued prudently" No limits on which types of assets held Market value of assets MV liabilities (hedgeable) Free Capital Adjusted SCR SCR MCR Risk margin BEL Other liabilities 8

Solvency II Liability valuation Hedgeable risks valued market consistently Non-hedgeable risks valued at best estimate plus risk margin Future discretionary benefits generally included as liabilities Discount rate based on government bond yield curve or swap curve if more appropriate Stochastic calculation of options and guarantees Market value of assets MV liabilities (hedgeable) Free Capital Adjusted SCR SCR MCR Risk margin BEL Other liabilities 9

Solvency II Risk margins Cost of capital approach Time SCR i Cost of Capital Capital charges Future SCRs include all risks in year 1 but exclude market and credit risk from year 2 onwards Discount factor 0 SCR 0 * 6% = Cap charge 0 * D 0 1 SCR 1 * 6% = Cap charge 1 * D 1 2 SCR 2 * 6% = Cap charge 2 * D 2................ ω SCR ω * 6% = Cap charge ω * D ω Market value of assets Free Capital Adjusted SCR MV liabilities (hedgeable) SCR MCR Risk margin BEL Other liabilities 10

Eligible capital Quality Nature On balance sheet (basic own funds) High Tier 1 Tier 2 Medium Tier 2 Tier 3 Low Tier 3 Off balance sheet (ancillary own funds) Solvency tests T1 + T2 + T3 SCR T1 + T2 MCR For SCR For MCR 0.5 x (T1 + T2) T3 2 x T1 T2 + T3 T1 T2 11

Minimum Capital Requirement (MCR) MCR calibrated to 80 to 90% VaR over one year, but using a simple factor-based formula RPS MCR AMCR Free Capital Adjusted SCR SCR MCR mkt MCR nl MCR life Special Market value of assets RPS reduction for profit sharing based on comparison of reserves to guaranteed surrender values Correlations as for SCR Absolute MCR (AMCR) floor value Testing alternative approach of 33% of the SCR Transitional period (1 year) to allow time to cover MCR MV liabilities (hedgeable) MCR Risk margin BEL Other liabilities 12

Solvency Capital Requirement (SCR) SCR = BSCR + SCR op Calibrated to 99.5% 1 year VaR SCR BSCR SCR op = adjustment for the risk mitigating effect of future profit sharing SCR nl SCR mkt SCR def SCR health SCR life NL pr MKT eq Life lapse Life mort NL cat MKT sp MKT conc Life exp Life long MKT int Life dis Life cat MKT prop MKT fx Source: QIS3 technical specification 13

Example stress tests 10 year rates = +42%/-34% Global equity return = -32% Other equity return = -45% Real estate return = -20% AAA credit spreads = +0.25% A credit spreads = +1.03% Mortality = +10% Longevity = -25% Lapses = +/- 50% Expenses = +10% & +1% pa Disability = +35% (year 1), +25% (thereafter) Catastrophe = 0.15% deaths & 75% of VA policies lapse Source: QIS3 technical specification Stress test calibration continues 14

Aggregation of risks Factors prescribed CorrSCR SCR mkt SCR def SCR life SCR health SCR nl SCR mkt 1 SCR def 0.25 1 SCR life 0.25 0.25 1 SCR health 0.25 0.25 0.25 1 SCR nl 0.25 0.5 0 0 1 Source: Draft framework directive Favours a diverse portfolio of risks 15

Market risk - correlation matrices Factors prescribed Correlation matrix continuing to change CorrMkt Mkt int Mkt eq Mkt prop Mkt sp Mkt conc Mkt fx Mkt int 1 Mkt eq 0.75/0 1 Mkt prop 0.75/0.5 1/0.75 1 Mkt sp 0.25 0.25 0.25 1 Mkt conc 0 0 0 0 1 Mkt fx 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0 1 Source: QIS3 technical specification and CEIOPS' "Pillar I issues further advice" Critical issue for some business lines 16

Agenda Overview Pillar 1 - Capital requirements Pillar 2 - Supervisory review Pillar 3 - Disclosure Conclusions 17

Pillar 2 Supervisory Review Process ( SRP ) should review: SCR Own Risk Self Assessment ( ORSA ) Risk management & internal systems and controls As part of the SRP the insurer will provide: Policy on solvency capital Analysis of differences between internal capital requirement and standard model SCR Multi-year perspective assessment Capital add-ons based on events beyond one year time horizon will be "neither routinely nor commonly applied" Detailed review => strain on supervisors 18

Agenda Pillar 1 - Capital requirements Pillar 2 - Supervisory review Pillar 3 - Disclosure Conclusions 19

Pillar 3 advice Key principles for disclosures Include information necessary for financial condition assessment by the supervisor Public disclosure to support transparency and market discipline Timely, accurate and readily understandable Supported by formal policy to assess appropriateness of disclosures Group and solo information provided where relevant Can be fulfilled by other disclosures Public disclosure on an annual basis as a minimum, regulatory disclosure frequency varies by item Total SCR and any capital add-on imposed by the supervisor to be disclosed (possibly 5 year moratorium on separate disclosures) Breaches of MCR and material breaches of the SCR to be publicly disclosed immediately Difficult to estimate the market impact 20

Agenda Overview Pillar 1 - Capital requirements Pillar 2 - Supervisory review Pillar 3 - Disclosure Conclusions 21

Conclusions Significant modeling enhancements are required Better risk quantification and management will follow Concerns over: Initial impact Systemic risk and volatility Complexity & cost for small firms Beginning to have wider impact Influencing thinking of non-eu regulators and rating agencies Interaction with economic capital methodologies 22

Questions 23