Overcoming Obstacles to Building Public Debt Management Capacity World Bank Debt Management Forum, Washington, October 29, 2012 Ministry of Finance of the Republic of Indonesia Direcrorate General of Debt Management
Topic of Discussion 2
Debt Management Reform in Indonesia Asian Financial Crisis Implied a Sudden and Substantial Increase in Debt Levels 100% 80% 60% 40% 38,8% 1990-1997 88,4% 1998-2012 Debt to GDP ratio yr 2010-2012 lower than average ratio before economic crisis in 1997 20% 24,6% 23,2% 0% 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 KrisisEkonomi thn. 1997 Debt Profile (trilliun Rupiah) 2,000 1,600 1,200 800 400-1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 PDN SBN DN SBN LN PLN Kurs USD-IDR [RHS] 13000 11000 9000 7000 5000 3000 1000
Reasons for the DMO Establishment in MoF Governance and Strategy Development ; Legal Framework (primary legislation ) : Law 17/2003 on State Financial; Law 1/ on Treasury. Special Law 24/2003 on Government Securities; Managerial Structure. Central government debt is managed by to division that is separated and worked without standard guideline; 1999- (DMU), CMGB, GBD DMO 2006 on ward 1970- External Loan Division Relatively Weak Capacity staff Debt Management Strategy (2005-2009) was enacted in 2005 and need to be executed fully by two divisions; Need for evaluation the debt management operations. 4 4
Reasons for the DMO Establishment in MoF Audit. Lack of capacity in external loan division in term of data base recording ( integrity and reliability) and loan storage need to be enhanced for audit purpose; DMO is needed to intensify close coordination with : Fiscal policy in providing accurate debt service forecast and its scenario; Monetary policy in keeping the central Bank with the information of future debt transaction and government cash flow; 1999- (DMU), CMGB, GBD DMO 2006 on ward 1970- External Loan Division Relatively Weak Capacity staff 5 5
Reasons for the DMO Establishment in MoF Borrowing and Related Financing Activities. Domestic Market Borrowing. DMO is needed to develop domestic bond market and broadening bond instrument in order achieve the goal of debt management strategy (2005-2009) that consists of optimum portfolio management and market development; 1999- (DMU), CMGB, GBD DMO 2006 on ward 1970- External Loan Division Relatively Weak Capacity staff Support is needed for external loan division that have to resolve the classical issue of low disbursement among other creating Internal procedure document, and professional legal adviser. 6 6
Reason for the DMO Establishment in MoF Borrowing and Related Financing Activities. Need to include Loan Guarantees on debt management strategy, clarity for on lending policy; and execution of the derivatives operations. 1999- (DMU), CMGB, GBD DMO 2006 on ward 1970- External Loan Division Relatively Weak Capacity staff Cash flow Forecasting and Cash Balance Management; Need to have a reliability of cash forecasting, and the procedure to invest the idle cash in the market. Operational Risk Management; Debt Administration and Data Securities. Need to strengthen a readily accessible procedure manual for external loan concessional recording, debt service payment, and storage agreement. 7 7
Reasons for the DMO Establishment in MoF Operational Risk Management; Segregation of Duties, Staff Capacities; and Business Continuity. Need to have clarity in the functionalities of the debt manager of the External Loan Division - act to negotiate loan and should not service the debt; Need to have a monitoring for risk of external loan; Clarity for those who record and make payment of debt service, and accounting system. 1999- (DMU), CMGB, GBD DMO 2006 on ward 1970- External Loan Division Relatively Weak Capacity staff Operational Risk Management; Need to enhance the single data base of the government debt through conversion of two data recording in the similar systems (DMFAS); Need to enhance the Bulletin of central government debt. 8 8
Milestone of Government Securities Management Bond Recapitulation Bond Recapitulation Reprofiling First Bond Issuance Budget Financing, First Global Bond (INDO-14) Law 24/2002 1 st Calendar of issuance Monthly regular issuance 1999 2002 2003 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 First Syariah Retail Bond Law Syariah Bond First Syariah Bond First T Bill DMO Establishment First Global Bond with tenor 30 years Crisis Management Protocol First Zero Coupon Bond First Retail Bond 9
Bond Recapitulation Government Bond for Budget Financing Milestone of Indonesia Debt Management Office 1999 2001 Debt Management Unit (DMU), Central Management Government Bond Government Bond Division 2006 1970- External Loan Division Debt Management Office Government Bond (Syariah) Division Government Bond Division Middle Office External Loan Division Back Office 10 10
The Role of External Support AusAid Capacity Building on : Cost and Risk Analysis Concept; Debt Management Office (DMO) Concept; World Bank Diagnostic Report and Implementation SECO Switzerland DMFAS Ehancement Version 6.0; Contingent Liability Concept; Risk Cost Analysis 1999 2001 2006 on ward Debt Management Unit (DMU), Central Management Government Bond Government Bond Division DMO 1970- External Loan Division AusAid Concept on Foreign Aid Law IT gap; Data Library Concept. UNCTAD Debt manegement Conference Ehancement of DMFAS. World Bank ALM 11 11
The Impact of Reform Better Governance and Strategy Development ; Enhancement of Debt Management Strategy formulation (2010-2014); Easier coordination among FO, MO and BO to execute Debt Management Strategy goal and target; More efficient and effective debt management operation and evaluation. 1999- (DMU), CMGB, GBD DMO 2006 on ward 1970- External Loan Division Relatively Weak Capacity staff 12
The Impact of Reform Better Operational Risk Management; Clear segregation of duties, among FO, MO and BO; check and balance mechanism for those who verify and arrange payment of debt service; Enhancement of risk monitoring and complaince; 1999- (DMU), CMGB, GBD DMO 2006 on ward 1970- External Loan Division Relatively Weak Capacity staff Better recording in the External Loan Division; More data reporting on cenrtal government debt, public sector debt, produced to several stake holder including the rating agencies. 13
Lesson Learned from the Establishment of DMO Benefits Improvement in the debt profile Better portfolio and risk management Improvement in debt data consolidation Supporting Government debt management objective of lowering down Debt/GDP ratio Generating synergy in managing debt financing to cope with market dynamics Promoting efficiency in debt management Reducing bureaucratic process in terms of financing the budget Achievements Established risk committee to supervise market volatility and its impact on the Government Debt market and to supervise daily operational risks of the DMO Established integrated debt service settlement for loans and Government securities Established integrated portfolio and risk management Developed effective communication with lenders, investors and credit rating assessors which led an upgrade in sovereign rating to investment grade and an improvement in Country Risk Classification Established monitoring systems and legal framework for contingent liabilities management Improvement in human capital development 14
Attachment 15
Government Bonds Market Development Strategy DEEP, ACTIVE, AND LIQUID BOND MARKET ABSORPTION CAPACITY EFFICIENT PRICE / YIELD Widening Investor Base Market Deepening Facilitating Efficient Price Discovery Mechanism Market Making Regular calendar of issuance Product diversification Methods of sale of bonds (private placement, bookbuilding, auction) Demand & Supply Bond reopening Tax incentive OMO instruments Secondary reserve New market, e.g, retails Transparency Trading platform Borrowing & lending facilities, Repo window Market Infrastructure Primary dealership system Clearing & Settlement Market surveillance 16
Formula of Annual Financing Strategy One year risk limit Bond Market Development - Demand & Supply - Market Infrastructure One year projection of market condition Recent market condition Government Securities Issuance Composition: - Tenor - Currency - Interest Rate Type DEBT MANAGEMENT STRATEGY Annual Borrowing Program Government Securities Buyback and Debt Switch Program Lender capacity assessment Market demand assessment Loan Composition: - Tenor - Currency - Interest Rate Type Instrument development Annual Hedging Strategy 17
Domestic Government Debt Securities Yield Curve [ % ] 12 10 8 Declining cost of fund of Domestic Government Securities reflects increasing market confidence as a response of prudent fiscal policy and debt management. 6 4 1Y2Y3Y4Y5Y6Y7Y8Y9Y10Y 15Y 20Y 30Y 28 Sep '12 Des '11 Des '10 Des '09 Des '08 Tenor 28-Sep-12 Des '11 Des '10 Des '09 Des '08 1Y 4,76 4,35 5,36 6,72 10,36 2Y 5,15 4,92 5,82 7,61 11,22 3Y 5,33 5,22 6,27 8,23 11,45 4Y 5,49 5,24 6,34 8,75 11,67 5Y 5,54 5,35 6,78 8,80 11,70 6Y 5,69 5,45 6,96 9,06 11,77 7Y 5,78 5,83 7,16 9,24 11,82 10Y 5,98 5,96 7,57 10,04 11,86 15Y 6,34 6,56 8,78 10,64 11,92 20Y 6,72 7,02 9,24 10,72 11,91 30Y 6,53 7,26 9,68 10,97 12,17
Indonesian Global Bond Yield Curve [ % ] 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 31-Dec-08 31-Dec-09 31-Dec-10 30-Dec-11 28-Sep-12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31-Dec-08 31-Dec-09 31-Dec-10 30-Dec-11 28-Sep-12 2 Y 2,707 1,453 3 Y 2,991 1,79 4 Y 2,55 3,079 5 Y 8,642 4,188 3,169 3,374 2,044 6 Y 9,057 4,387 3,608 3,515 2,263 7 Y 9,925 4,886 3,931 3,899 2,589 8 Y 5,107 4,146 3,955 2,788 9 Y 9,385 5,255 4,468 2,997 20 Y 4,486 25 Y 9,662 6,731 5,954 5,044 4,444 30 Y 9,321 6,806 6,065 5,201 4,402
Average Daily Trading of Domestic Gov t. Securities [ Triliun Rupiah] / [IDR Trillion] 12.0 [ Frekuensi] / [Frequency] 600 11.0 10.0 9.0 8.0 7.0 6.0 5.0 4.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 Positive trend on average daily trading activity shows increasing market liquidity J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 500 400 300 200 100 0 Volume Rata-Rata Volume per Tahun (Average Daily Volume per Year) Frekuensi (Frequency) - RHS
Government Debt Securities Ownership Rp Triliun / IDR trillion 900 800 700 More diversified investor base which demonstrated by increasing ownership from non-bank, foreign and retail investor. Increasing offshore ownership indicates better market confidence. 50.00% 45.00% 40.00% 600 500 400 300 200 35.00% 30.00% 25.00% 20.00% 15.00% 10.00% 100 5.00% 0 - Jan'07 May'07 Sep'07 Jan '08 May'08 Sep'08 Jan'09 May'09 Sep'09 Jan'10 May'10 Sep'10 Jan'11 May'11 Sep'11 Jan'12 May'12 NON-BANK BANK % Asing thd. Total/Foreign to Total - RHS 28-Sep-12 Notes: Non-Bank including Government institution
Foreign Ownership of Dom. Gov t. Securities by Tenor [Rp miliar] / [IDR billion] 250.000 Long end Government Debt Securities dominates foreign holding which reached by 69,86% as of September 28, 2012 200.000 150.000 67,34% 70,61% 100.000 50.000 19,23% 18,40% 4,50% 2,69% 8.93% 8,30% 0 December-10 December-11 January-12 May-12 June-12 July-12 August-12 28-Sep-12 Total 195.755 222.857 235.971 224.502 224.422 234.556 233.155 242.887 >5 131.232 140.762 145.759 142.470 150.943 157.951 164.624 169.691 >2-5 35.511 37.400 39.582 41.124 38.632 45.097 42.903 44.907 >1-2 9.077 18.252 19.606 15.596 11.026 10.561 6.264 3.549 0-1 19.935 26.443 31.024 25.311 23.821 20.946 19.363 24.740
Indonesia Credit Rating Performance (1) Indonesia Rating Performance 1999-2012 Year Rating S&P Fitch Moody's R&I JCRA CRC 1999 CCC+ B- B3 B- - 6 2000 B- B- B3 B- - 6 2001 CCC B- B3 B- - 6 2002 CCC+ B B3 B- B 6 2003 B B+ B2 B- B 6 B+ B+ B2 B- B+ 6 2005 B+ BB- B2 BB- B+ 5 on March 30, 2012, OECD upgraded CRC of Indonesia from classification 4 to 3 on January 18, 2012, Moody's upgraded Indonesia's Credit Rating from Ba1 to Baa3 2006 BB- BB- B1 BB- BB- 5 2007 BB- BB- Ba3 BB+ BB- 5 2008 BB- BB Ba3 BB+ BB- 5 2009 BB- BB Ba2 BB+ BB+ 5 2010 BB BB+ Ba2 BB+ BBB- 4 2011 BB+ BBB- Ba1 BB+ BBB- 4 2012 BB+ BBB- Baa3 BBB- BB+ BBB- 3
Indonesia Credit Rating Performance (2) Investment grade Non Investment grade BBB+ BBB BBB- BB+ BB BB- B+ B B- 14 13 12 11 10 CCC+ CCC CCC- CC R/C 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Krisis ekonomi S&P sempat menurunkan rating ke Selective Default namun direvisi kembali 2 hari kemudian 1998 Rekapitalisasi Reprofiling VR & HB, Perbankan Asset-Bond Swap, & penerbitan SUN jk panjang Lelang penerbitan SUN secara reguler, program Buyback Lelang penerbitan SUN secara reguler, program Buyback, & Debt Swtiching Lelang penerbitan SUN secara reguler, program Buyback, Debt Swtiching, & diversivikasi instrumen Moodys s menaikan rating ke Baa3 per 18 Januari 2012 S&P s menaikan rating ke BB+ per 8 April 2011 Moodys s menaikan rating ke Ba1 per 17 Januari 2011 Fitch s menaikan rating ke BBBper 15 Desember 2011 SD/DDD - 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Moody's (RHS) S&P's Fitch's S&P's Fitch's Moody's (RHS) 14.00 Baa1 13.00 Baa2 12.00 Baa3 11.00 10.00 9.00 8.00 7.00 6.00 4.00 Caa2 2.00 1.00 - Ba1 Ba2 Ba3 B1 B2 B3 5.00 Caa1 3.00 Caa3 Ca C Investment grade Non Investment grade
Interest Rate Risk Debt Risk Indicators 2007-2011 Exchange Rate Risk 30.2 26.7 22.9 28.2 28.2 26.1 25.9 21.2 20.3 18.8 16.5 23.4 46.9 52.1 47.4 46.2 45.1 44.8 16.5 17.2 13.4 12.1 10.9 11.0 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Q2-2012 Variable rate ratio [%] Refixing rate [%] 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Q2-2012 FX Debt to GDP ratio (%) FX Debt to total debt ratio (%) Average Time To Maturity (ATM)-Years 10.4 10.0 9.7 9.7 9.5 9.3 Debt Maturing in 1, 3 and 5 Years 33.2 34.2 34.6 33.5 30.6 31.1 22.7 19.4 18.6 20.3 20.8 22.0 6.8 6.4 7.6 7.1 8.2 8.0 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Q2-2012 Average Time to Maturity (in percentage) 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Q2-2012 Maturity debt portion < 1 year (%) Maturity debt portion < 3 year (%) Maturity debt portion < 5 year (%)
Pending Matters of DMO Issues Developing a reliable debt database (mainly Loans) Establishing the primary dealer system Conducting direct transactions through DMO dealing room Diversifying Gov t securities instruments adding retail bonds and shariah compliance Gov t securities Improving business process and SOP for loan procurement (emphasizing on loan negotiation) Developing benchmark rate Purposes Supporting the formulation of annual and medium term debt management strategy Supporting policy of budget financing Managing Gov t securities liquidity in secondary market Improving liquidity in secondary market during market turbulence Matching investors preference Managing portfolio Widening investor base Maintaining good governance on loan management Providing comparison for loan effective rate Remarks An accurate and comprehensive loan database is still in the development process Lack of incentives for primary dealers, for example prioritizing PDs members for global bonds JLM selection Limited availability of funds for direct transactions and long & bureaucratic process to approve the transactions Regulations for new instruments need to be strengthened There are some SOP for front office that overlapped with middle office There is a wide gap between loan effective rate and benchmark rate 26
Challenges and Future Developments Challenges Institutional Development Moving towards IT based debt management Improving effective and efficient risk management Reducing impact of rising cost of Developing debt Government securities market Increasing resiliency of Government securities management Business process leads to inefficiencies in loan execution Development of IT systems Integrated database to support effective and reliable database Establish consolidated ALM System Development of hedging mechanism Formulating derivative instruments infrastructures Continuous improvement on debt issuance and procurement mechanisms Instruments diversification to match financing needs and investors preference Development of organization capacity to support project-based Government shariah securities Developing crisis management protocol Matching calendar of issuance and cash projections to reduce idle cash Development of instruments to match financing needs and investors preference Close coordination with related parties to improve loan management efficiency Continuous staff capacity building 27