F. Barry Lawrence, Ph.D., Texas A&M University

Similar documents
F. Barry Lawrence, Ph.D., Texas A&M University

Rebeccas Coffee 2018 Prepared for Rebeccas Coffee 05 December 2018

Williams Plumbing 2018 Prepared for Williams Plumbing 05 December 2018

Core-Mark Holding Company, Inc. B B & T Consumer, Food & Retail Conference New York December 3, 2013

{List Sales (1 Trade Discount) Total Cost} (1 Tax Rate) = 0.06K

Contents. Preface... xiii. CHAPTER 1 Introduction to Management Accounting and Control CHAPTER 2 Management Reporting... 29

Lecture 7. Introduction to Retailer Simulation Summary and Preparation for next class

Software Economics. Introduction to Business Case Analysis. Session 1

Index. Business unit, 311, 350 Business-unit level strategies, 309, 311 Business-unit strategies, 311, 350

Financing for Energy & Sustainability

Core-Mark Holding Company Jefferies 2017 Consumer Conference. June 21 st 2017

MERGERS & ACQUISITIONS. Michael Dudek, President (610)

Wikipedia: "Financial Ratio" Contents. Sources of Data for Financial Ratios. Purpose and Types of Ratios

SAMPLE REPORT. Service Desk Benchmark DATA IS NOT ACCURATE! Outsourced Service Desks

Retailing Financial Strategy

Enhancing cash flow management and capital efficiency toward increased corporate value over the medium-to-long term

Total Risk Management: Mitigating Insurable & Uninsurable Risk in Your Portfolio Investments

CMA 2010 Support Package

Session 2, Sunday, April 2nd (1:30-5:00) v Association for Financial Professionals. All rights reserved. Session 3-1

Credit Insurance Limit Underwriting Case Studies AMAN Union 2 nd Training Session, Dubai - April 2012 Maroun Abi Saad

WORKING CAPITAL ANALYSIS OF SELECT CEMENT COMPANIES IN INDIA

Sample Extreme Client

Effective Use of Pavement Management Programs. Roger E. Smith, P.E., Ph.D. Zachry Department of Civil Engineering Texas A&M University

Essential Learning for CTP Candidates TEXPO Conference 2017 Session #03

Financials. Lecture 7

Financial Analysis. Consolidated financial analysis ( ) Based on IFRS

Applications of Linear Programming

Risk Management for Chemical Supply Chain Planning under Uncertainty

Unlocking the Value of the Financial Supply Chain

AFP Financial Planning & Analysis Learning System Session 2, Sunday, April 2nd (1:30-5:00)

Portfolio Construction Research by

FINANCIAL RATIOS. LIQUIDITY RATIOS (and Working Capital) You want current and quick ratios to be > 1. Current Liabilities SAMPLE BALANCE SHEET ASSETS

CHAPTER 2: CONSTRUCTING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Taking the Next Step Team Sauder. Jarl Greve Nadine Raida Morten Juhl Sebastian Kersting

B. Riley Investor Conference. May 23, 2018

Analytics That Work Tools for Creating Value and Focusing Performance

Software Economics. Introduction to Business Case Analysis. Session 3

Executive Action Report. For the month ending January 31, 2014 (and the prior thirteen months) Hello Telephone Co

Cost Risk and Uncertainty Analysis

Supply chain management and return on total net assets Understanding the impact of SCM decisions on financial performance

3 rd Quarter 2015 Earnings Release

ANALYSIS 1) Analysts are predicting that Krispy Kreme will be able to perform highly effectively and continue to grow rapidly in the coming two years.

Cash flow and Treasury Driving to Positive Cash. December 2015

Defense Health Agency Future Capital Funding

2015 IWDC Owners Meeting

SAMPLE REPORT. Call Center Benchmark. In-house/Insourced Call Centers DATA IS NOT ACCURATE!

YOUR SMALL BUSINESS SCORECARD. Your Small Business Scorecard. David Oetken, MBA CPM

John A. Jaeger, CCE, MBA

Q1 The committee set attainable initiatives.

Supplier A - INSOURCE

LIQUIDITY A measure of the company's ability to meet obligations as they come due. Financial Score for Restaurant

Credit Risk Scoring - Basics

How Advanced Pricing Analysis Can Support Underwriting by Claudine Modlin, FCAS, MAAA

Investor Presentation. March 2016

Tykoh Valuation Utility - user guide v 1.1

SAMPLE REPORT. Contact Center Benchmark DATA IS NOT ACCURATE! Outsourced Contact Centers

Ontario Energy Board

SAMPLE REPORT. Contact Center Benchmark DATA IS NOT ACCURATE! In-house/Insourced Contact Centers

Analysis write-up at: GOOGLE INC. (GOOG) #2 SUSTAINABLE REVENUE GROWTH

An Empirical Examination of the Electric Utilities Industry. December 19, Regulatory Induced Risk Aversion in. Contracting Behavior

For 466W Forest Resource Management Lab 5: Marginal Analysis of the Rotation Decision in Even-aged Stands February 11, 2004

Option Value Analysis of Flexibility in Supply Chain Postponement. Option Value Analysis of Flexibility in Supply Chain Postponement

The following learning and growth perspective measures could enhance the implementation and management of Wellgas strategy:

What Are the Key Business Problems?

EE266 Homework 5 Solutions

G/L Re-Indexing. Preliminary Considerations. Summary Re-Index Process

Sigma Pharmaceuticals Limited

Setting the Ground for Business Success

A Holistic Supply Chain Management Solution

Breakfast Talk Series: Strategies to unlock working capital. Marvin Tan Executive Director

The Business Case for Automation

Production Management Winter 2002 Odette School of Business University of Windsor. Midterm Exam 2 Solution Tuesday, March 26, 7:00 9:00 pm

Financial Aspects in Franchising

Supply Chains: Planning with Dynamic Demand

Finance Recruiting Interview Preparation

The Complete Course On Budgeting: Planning, Forecasting, What If Analysis And Reporting

Stress Testing Challenges:

Q3 Fiscal Year 2016 Financial Results January 20, 2016

TIPS TO CREATING A HEALTHY CASH FLOW

CORNERSTONES. of Managerial Accounting. Dan L. Heitger. Maryanne M. Mowen. Don R. Hansen. Miami University ~ Oxford. Oklahoma State University

CHAPTER 3. Topics in Chapter. Analysis of Financial Statements

QuickBooks Integration (Enterprise)

Business Ratios. Current Ratio

May 2017 Investor Meetings

Week-2. Dr. Ahmed. Strategic Plan

Paper P2 PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT. Acorn Chapters

Raising Your Actuarial IQ (Improving Information Quality)

Operational Risk Management: How Emerging Best Practices Can Improve Performance

ENGINEERING FIRM #2 SUSTAINABLE REVENUE GROWTH PRICE ADJ REV SUSTAINABLE REV NOMINAL REV

The CEO s End Game: Realizing Shareholder Value

Q (Ended June 30, 2018) Conference Call. August 10, 2018

All tied up MENA. Working capital management report 2017

BATCH All Batches. DATE: MAXIMUM MARKS: 100 TIMING: 3 Hours. PAPER 3 : Cost Accounting

Building the Business Case for Automation

Solutions to questions in Chapter 8 except those in PS4. The minimum-variance portfolio is found by applying the formula:

Chapter 23 Performance Evaluation for Decentralized Operations Study Guide Solutions Fill-in-the-Blank Equations. Exercises

Essential reading. If maximum possible points are scored at Disclosure level, 1 Leadership point is awarded (please see % Weightings tab for details).

Half Year 2016 Results Presentation


Performance Highlights. Prepared for. MEGALO Hospitality. CLIENT Restaurant Client. Period. Jun Created on 10th June 2017

Transcription:

F101 Optimizing Supplier Alliances Best practices in formulating, formalizing, and leveraging strategic suppliers are cutting edge and understood by only a few distributors. This session will explore how best practice supplier relationships create more effective supply chains, capture more market share, and optimize profitability. The best practices will be supported with case study results from Texas A&M s many research projects with best practice firms. F. Barry Lawrence, Ph.D., Texas A&M University 3/12/2010, 9:30 a.m.

Session Objectives Develop business process framework Develop financial framework Link business processes and shareholder value Implement best practices Quantify impact of best practices on profitability 2

Return on Investment Opportunity Quantify impact of best practices on profitability Prioritize improvement opportunities Increased EBITDA and RONA 3

Additional Resources Optimizing Distributor Profitability available from the NAW. http://www.naw.org/optimizdistprof Educational Programs from the Thomas and Joan Read Center for Distribution Research and Education at http://readcenter.tamu.edu Pricing Optimization Optimizing Distributor Profitability Certificate in Distribution Management Custom Programs Research from the Supply Chain Systems Laboratory http://supplychain.tamu.edu/ tamu 4

The ROI Equation Financial Statements 5

Business Process Framework Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) Supply Chain Planning Supplier Customer Source Stock Store Sell Ship Support Services Information Management Human Resource Management Finance Managemnet 6

Financial Drivers 7

Step 1 Identify Gap Sample Assessment Report 8

Step 2: Map Shareholder Value Distributor Profitability Framework 9

Supplier Performance and ROI 10

Step 3: Assess Profitability Supplier Lead Time Variability Safety Stock Average Inventory GMROII % RONA 11

SOURCE Process Group Suppliers Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) Supply Chain Planning Supplier Customer Source Stock Store Sell Ship Support Services Information Management Human Resource Management Finance Managemnet 12

Source Processes Distribution Source Stock Store Sell Ship Support Services Supplier Management Supplier Selection Supplier Performance Supplier Stratification Supplier Relationship Right # Suppliers 13

Supplier Stratification Best Practices Good Practices Pe erforma ance Common Practices Segmentation based on COGS by supplier Pareto framework (80%-20%) Loyalty, Profitability, Services, Performance Risk/Exposure supply availability, technical requirements, financial factors, technological factors and environmental issues Landed Cost (TCO) Combination Methodology Purchase price variance Landed dcost Lacks segmentation framework Time 14

Supplier Stratification Relationships 15

Supplier Management Best Practices Good Practices Perform mance Common Practices On time delivery Lead time Quality & Delivery completeness On time delivery Lead time Quality & Delivery completeness Lead time variability Combination methodology - Supplier Performance Index (SPI) No supplier performance measurement On time delivery (Reactive measurement only) Quality Time 16

Supplier Performance Ranking Criteria Sample ranking criteria for supplier performance factors Factors A B C D Lead Time Average < 2 weeks 2 to 4 weeks 4 to 8 weeks > 8 weeks Lead Time Variability (COV) <= 0.25 0.26 0.50 0.51 0.75 > 0.75 On-Time Index >= 0.76 0.51 0.75 0.26 0.50 <= 0.25 Completeness Index >= 0.76 0.51 0.75 0.26 0.50 <= 0.25 17

Supplier Performance Final Rank Weighting approach to combine individual ranks Supplier List 20% 30% 25% 25% Lead Time Average Lead Time Variability On-Time Index Completeness Index Final Rank Supplier 1 A A B A A Supplier 2 A A B D A Supplier 3 A D C A C Supplier 4 B A B C A Supplier 5 B C C A B : : : : : : 18

Lead Time Variability Schematic Basic Input Parameters Additional Revenue EBITDA Lead Time LT Var. Expected Turns P&L and Bal. Sheet Safety Stock Average Inventory % of reinvestment YES Re-invest? NO RONA GMROII Turns 19

Financial Statements Typical Distributor Income Statement Fixed Variable Net Sales $ 148,265,879 100% Cost of Goods Sold $ 110,902,877 74.8% 0% 100% Gross Margin $ 37,363,002 25.2% Employee Compensation - Outside S $ 9,059,045 6.11% 25% 75% Employee Compensation - Others $ 9,385,230 6.3% 90% 10% Warehouse Expenses $ 4,477,630 3.0% 50% 50% Delivery Expenses $ 4,536,936 3.1% 20% 80% Other Operating Expenses (G&A) $ 2,194,335 1.5% 25% 75% Total Operating Expenses $ 29,653,176 20.0% 0% Operating Margin $ 7,709,826 5.2% Other Income $ - 0.0% Other Expenses $ - 0.0% EBITDA $ 7,709,826 5.2% Balance Sheet Assets By Total Assets Inventory $ 17,470,663 37.6% Accounts Receivables $ 18,829,767 40.6% Cash & Marketable Securities $ 1,990,029 4.3% Other Currrent Assets $ 1,978,468 4.3% Total Current Assets $ 40,268,926 86.7% Fixed & Non-current Assets $ 6,153,034 13.3% Total Assets $ 46,421,960 100.0% Liabilities & Net Worth By Total Liabilities & Net Worth Accounts Payables $ 9,884,392 21.3% Notes Payable (Short-term Debt) $ 1,427,456 3.1% Other Current Liabilities $ 2,404,335 5.2% Total Current Liabilities $ 13,716,183 29.5% Long-term Liabilities $ 4,991,618 10.8% Net Worth Or Owner's Equity $ 27,714,159 59.7% Total Liabilities & Net Worth $ 46,421,960421 100.0% 0% 20

Financial KPIs Typical Distributor Financial KPIs Current CASH FLOW DSO 46.4 DPO 32.5 DOI 57.50 Cash Conversion Cycle 71.3 Working Capital as a % of rev 17.9% PROFITABILITY Gross Margin % 25.2% EBITDA Margin % 5.2% Personnel Productivity it Ratio (PPR) 049 0.49 GMROI % 214% % change in EBITDA $ GROWTH Revenue Growth % 5.3% ASSET EFFICIENCY Asset Turnover 3.19 Receivables Turnover 7.9 Inventory Turnover 6.35 RONA (EBITDA/Net Assets) 23.57% 21

Critical Information Current inventory = $ 17,470,663 6 critical suppliers account for 77% inventory Inventory considered = $ 13,452,410 410 (77%) Number of SKUs considered = 5,237 Objective is to reduce lead time variability by 10% 22

Input Parameters For a top selling item Supplier Parameters Average Lead Time 28 Days Lead Time Variability (Expressed as standard deviation) 7 Days Unit Cost $201.25 Distributor Parameters Monthly Demand 12,050 Units Cycle Service Level (CSL) 85% Forecast Accuracy 80% Order Quantity (OQ) 2,400 units Calculation Cycle Inventory (Half of OQ) 1,200 Units Safety Inventory 4,416 Units Average Inventory (Cycle + Safety) 5,616 Units 23

Impact of LT Variability on Inventory Lead Time Varibility (Days) Safety Stock (Qty) Average Inventory (Qty) % of Current Inventory 7 4,416 5,616 100% 6.3 4,201 5,401 96.2% 5.6 3,998 5,198 92.6% 4.9 3,811 5,011 89.2% 4.2 3,641 4,841 86.2% 3.5 3,491 4,691 83.5% 28 2.8 3363 3,363 4563 4,563 81.3% 2.1 3,260 4,460 79.4% 1.4 3,184 4,384 78.1% 07 0.7 3138 3,138 4338 4,338 77.2% 0 3,122 4,322 77.0% This implies a reduction in inventory for this SKU by 3.8% Let s extend this savings to the remaining SKU s Inventory reduction = 3.8% X $ 13,452,410 = $ 514,978 24

Lead Time Variability - Schematic Basic Input Parameters Additional Revenue = $ 514,978 X 6 / (1-25.2%) = $ 4,130,839 EBITDA Lead Time LT Var. Expected Turns 6 turns P&L and Bal. Sheet Safety Stock % of re- investment YES 100% RONA GMROII Turns Average Inventory Re-invest? NO $ 514,978 25

Impact on Income Statement Profitability Analysis - Income Statement Income Statement Current Scenario By Sales % Fixed Variable To-Be Scenario Formulae Column A B C D E Net Sales $ 148,265,879 100% $ 152,396,718 New Net Sales Cost of Goods Sold (COGS) $ 110,902,877 74.8% 0% 100% $ 113,992,745 (A * C) + (New Net Sales * B * D) Gross Margin $ 37,363,002 25.2% $ 38,403,973 (New Net Sales - COGS) Employee Compensation - Outside Sales $ 9,059,045 6.11% 25% 75% $ 9,248,341 (A * C) + (New Net Sales * B * D) Employee Compensation - Others $ 9,385,230 6.3% 90% 10% $ 9,411,378 (A * C) + (New Net Sales * B * D) Warehouse Expenses $ 4,477,630 3.0% 50% 50% $ 4,540,005 (A * C) + (New Net Sales * B * D) Delivery Expenses $ 4,536,936 3.1% 20% 80% $ 4,638,059 (A * C) + (New Net Sales * B * D) Other Operating Expenses (G&A) $ 2,194,335 1.5% 25% 75% $ 2,240,187 (A * C) + (New Net Sales * B * D) Total Operating Expenses $ 29,653,176 20.0% $ 30,077,971 Operating Margin $ 7,709,826709 52% 5.2% $ 8,326,002 Gross Margin - Total Operating Expenses Other Income $ - 0.0% $ - Other Expenses $ - 0.0% $ 62,954 Interest expense for additional accounts receivables @ 12% EBITDA $ 7,709,826 5.2% $ 8,263,048 26

Impact on Balance Sheet Profitability Analysis - Balance Sheet Balance Sheet Current Scenario To-Be Scenario Formulae Assets By Total Assets Inventory $ 17,470,663 37.6% $ 17,470,663 No change in inventory since re-allocated Accounts Receivables $ 18,829,767 40.6% $ 19,354,383 Days Sales Outstanding * (New Net Sales / 365) Cash & Marketable Securities $ 1,990,029 4.3% $ 1,990,029 Other Currrent Assets $ 1,978,468 4.3% $ 1,978,468 Total Current Assets $ 40,268,926 86.7% $ 40,793,543 Fixed & Non-current Assets $ 6,153,034 13.3% $ 6,153,034 Total Assets $ 46,421,960 100.0% $ 46,946,577 Liabilities & Net Worth By Total Liabilities & Net Worth Accounts Payables $ 9,884,392 21.3% $ 10,159,781 Notes Payable (Short-term Debt) $ 1,427,456 3.1% $ 1,427,456 Other Current Liabilities $ 2,404,335 5.2% $ 2,404,335 Total Current Liabilities $ 13,716,183 29.5% $ 13,991,572 Long-term Liabilities $ 4,991,618 10.8% $ 4,991,618 Net Worth Or Owner's Equity $ 27,714,159, 59.7% $ 27,963,387, Total Liabilities & Net Worth $ 46,421,960 100.0% $ 46,946,577 Days Payable Outstanding * (New COGS / 365) 27

Impact on Financial Metrics Key Metrics Current Potential Inventory Turns (Asset Efficiency) 6.4 6.5 RONA (Asset Efficiency) 23.6% 25.1% Cash Conversion Cycle (Cash Flow) 71.3 Days 69.8 Days GMROII (Profitability) 214% 220% EBITDA (Profitability) 52% 5.2% 54% 5.4% 28

Potential Profitability - Typical Distributor 40% Potential Profitability Curve SOURCE RONA % MINIMUM RONA % MAXIMUM RONA % Typical Distributor 36.73% 30% 31.54% 31.79% 29.03% 28.22% 28.50% 25.08% 25.55% 26.28% 24.53% 25.72% 26.00% 23.57% 20% Base Case Lead Time Lead Time Variability Completeness Index Payment Terms 29

Potential Profitability - Typical Distributor Impact of SOURCE best practices on EBITDA % Typical Distributor 5.2% 5.8% 5.8% 5.5% 6.0% Base Case Lead Time Lead Time Variability Completeness Index Payment Terms 30

Potential Profitability (RONA) Impact of SOURCE, STOCK, SELL, STORE & SHIP best practices on RONA Typical Distributor 75.2% 61.2% 67.7% 85.0% 23.6% 33.4% Base Case Source & Stock Store & Ship Sell Combined Combined Best Practices Best Practices MIN MAX 31

Potential Profitability (EBITDA) Impact of SOURCE, STOCK, SELL, STORE & SHIP best practices on EBITDA % Typical Distributor 5.20% 9.32% 7.17% 11.41% 10.29% 11.52% Base Case Source & Stock Store & Ship Sell Combined Best Practices MIN Combined Best Practices MAX 32

Action Plan Step 1: Properly segment suppliers. Step 2: Measure supplier performance. Step 3: Develop scorecard and share results with suppliers. Step 4: Demonstrate impact of supplier performance on shareholder value 33

Summary POTENTIAL for improving profitability exists Process and financial performance can be MEASURED to assess potential AONE-to-ONE connection can always be established for processes and shareholder value This connection can be QUANTIFIED and PRIORITIZED Best practices can be ACHIEVED Education will ENABLE distributors to realize POTENTIAL profitability 34

Thank You For Attending F101 Optimizing Supplier Alliances F. Barry Lawrence, Ph.D. Please submit the Session Feedback Form To receive NASBA credits, please be sure to complete the Session Feedback Form and sign the class roster in the back of the room Total Solutions For Industrial Distributors and Manufacturers Thank You! For more info please visit: http://supplychain.tamu.edu 35