Importantly, note that prices are not functions of the expenditure on advertising that firm 1 makes during the first period.

Similar documents
Econ 455 Answers - Problem Set Consider a small country (Belgium) with the following demand and supply curves for cloth:

Economics 2202 (Section 05) Macroeconomic Theory Practice Problem Set 3 Suggested Solutions Professor Sanjay Chugh Fall 2014

At a cost-minimizing input mix, the MRTS (ratio of marginal products) must equal the ratio of factor prices, or. f r

Problem Set 8 Topic BI: Externalities. a) What is the profit-maximizing level of output?

Licensing and Patent Protection

Output and Expenditure

Policy Consideration on Privatization in a Mixed Market

Economics 325 Intermediate Macroeconomic Analysis Practice Problem Set 1 Suggested Solutions Professor Sanjay Chugh Spring 2011

Forward Contracts and Collusion in the Electricity Markets

Microeconomics I - Seminar #9, April 17, Suggested Solution

Econ 101A Final exam May 14, 2013.

Imagine barriers between you and other buyers or sellers: legal, spatial, social, or temporal

Strategic Pre-Commitment

Exercises Solutions: Oligopoly

Economics 602 Macroeconomic Theory and Policy Problem Set 4 Suggested Solutions Professor Sanjay Chugh Summer 2010

Answer Key. q C. Firm i s profit-maximization problem (PMP) is given by. }{{} i + γ(a q i q j c)q Firm j s profit

Multi-Firm Mergers with Leaders and Followers

CUR 412: Game Theory and its Applications, Lecture 9

Say you have $X today and can earn an annual interest rate r by investing it. Let FV denote the future value of your investment and t = time.

Strategic Production Game 1

EconS Oligopoly - Part 3

Kyle Bagwell and Robert W. Staiger. Revised: November 1993

Oligopoly (contd.) Chapter 27

EconS 424 Strategy and Game Theory. Homework #5 Answer Key

TOTAL PART 1 / 50 TOTAL PART 2 / 50

Econ 101A Final exam May 14, 2013.

FOREST CITY INDUSTRIAL PARK FIN AN CIAL RETURNS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Sequential Procurement Auctions and Their Effect on Investment Decisions

Université du Maine Théorie des Jeux Yves Zenou Correction de l examen du 16 décembre 2013 (1 heure 30)

Intermediating Auctioneers

MKTG 555: Marketing Models

Decision-making Method for Low-rent Housing Construction Investment. Wei Zhang*, Liwen You

CUR 412: Game Theory and its Applications Final Exam Ronaldo Carpio Jan. 13, 2015

Name: Midterm #1 EconS 425 (February 20 th, 2015)

Market Power Rents and Climate Change Mitigation. A Rationale for Export Taxes on Coal? Philipp M. Richter, Roman Mendelevitch, Frank Jotzo

IS-LM model. Giovanni Di Bartolomeo Macro refresh course Economics PhD 2012/13

Title: Bertrand-Edgeworth Competition, Demand Uncertainty, and Asymmetric Outcomes * Authors: Stanley S. Reynolds Bart J. Wilson

Exogenous Information, Endogenous Information and Optimal Monetary Policy

Noncooperative Oligopoly

The Impact of Capacity Costs on Bidding Strategies in Procurement Auctions

Economics 111 Exam 1 Spring 2008 Prof Montgomery. Answer all questions. Explanations can be brief. 100 points possible.

Market Size, Trade, and Productivity Melitz and Ottaviano. Felix Bausch

The Simple Economics of White Elephants

ARTICLE IN PRESS. Journal of Health Economics xxx (2011) xxx xxx. Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect. Journal of Health Economics

DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES. No MARKET SIZE, ENTREPRENEURSHIP, AND INCOME INEQUALITY. Kristian Behrens, Dmitry Pokrovsky and Evgeny Zhelobodko

Optimal Monetary Policy in a Model of the Credit Channel

Strategic Dynamic Sourcing from Competing Suppliers: The Value of Commitment

Optimal Monetary Policy in a Model of the Credit Channel

EconS 424 Strategy and Game Theory. Homework #5 Answer Key

Elements of Economic Analysis II Lecture XI: Oligopoly: Cournot and Bertrand Competition

CONSUMPTION-LEISURE FRAMEWORK SEPTEMBER 20, 2010 THE THREE MACRO (AGGREGATE) MARKETS. The Three Macro Markets. Goods Markets.

Giacomo Calzolari and Giancarlo Spagnolo*

The Optimal Monetary and Fiscal Policy Mix in a Financially Heterogeneous Monetary Union

The Simple Economics of White Elephants

The Simple Economics of White Elephants

Lecture 9: Basic Oligopoly Models

PRISONER S DILEMMA. Example from P-R p. 455; also 476-7, Price-setting (Bertrand) duopoly Demand functions

Bidding for network size

ENTRY AND WELFARE IN SEARCH MARKETS*

Chapter 11: Dynamic Games and First and Second Movers

Voluntary Prices vs. Voluntary Quantities

Asymmetric Integration *

Introduction to Industrial Organization Professor: Caixia Shen Fall 2014 Lecture Note 5 Games and Strategy (Ch. 4)

AUDITING COST OVERRUN CLAIMS *

The effect of oil price shocks on economic growth (Case Study; Selected Oil Exporting Countries)

Ranking dynamics and volatility. Ronald Rousseau KU Leuven & Antwerp University, Belgium

Nash Bargaining Part I - The Continuous Case

14.02 Principles of Macroeconomics Quiz # 1, Answers

Next generation access networks and Smart Grid services - an applied model Preliminary paper

CERGE-EI GOVERNMENT S (IN)ABILITY TO PRECOMMIT, AND STRATEGIC TRADE POLICY: THE THIRD MARKET VERSUS THE HOME MARKET SETUP.

LECTURE NOTES ON GAME THEORY. Player 2 Cooperate Defect Cooperate (10,10) (-1,11) Defect (11,-1) (0,0)

CONSUMPTION-LABOR FRAMEWORK SEPTEMBER 19, (aka CONSUMPTION-LEISURE FRAMEWORK) THE THREE MACRO (AGGREGATE) MARKETS. The Three Macro Markets

Contending with Risk Selection in Competitive Health Insurance Markets

UC Berkeley Haas School of Business Economic Analysis for Business Decisions (EWMBA 201A) Fall 2012

Variable Markups and Misallocation in Chinese Manufacturing and Services

Lecture 7: The Theory of Demand. Where does demand come from? What factors influence choice? A simple model of choice

AP Macro Economics Review

Globalization, Jobs, and Welfare: The Roles of Social Protection and Redistribution 1

On the Welfare Benefits of an International Currency

Answers to Microeconomics Prelim of August 24, In practice, firms often price their products by marking up a fixed percentage over (average)

EC 202. Lecture notes 14 Oligopoly I. George Symeonidis

Consumption smoothing and the welfare consequences of social insurance in developing economies

Optimal Disclosure Decisions When There are Penalties for Nondisclosure

Duopoly models Multistage games with observed actions Subgame perfect equilibrium Extensive form of a game Two-stage prisoner s dilemma

IMPERFECT COMPETITION AND TRADE POLICY

MICROECONOMICS AND POLICY ANALYSIS - U8213 Professor Rajeev H. Dehejia Class Notes - Spring 2001

Game Theory with Applications to Finance and Marketing, I

1 Solutions to Homework 3

GS/ECON 5010 Answers to Assignment 3 November 2005

Lecture 6 Dynamic games with imperfect information

Exogenous Information, Endogenous Information and Optimal Monetary Policy

Title: The Relative-Profit-Maximization Objective of Private Firms and Endogenous Timing in a Mixed Oligopoly

Static Games and Cournot. Competition

Economics 101A (Lecture 21) Stefano DellaVigna

Should platforms be allowed to charge ad valorem fees?

Economics of Strategy (ECON 4550) Maymester 2015 Game Theoretic Models of Oligopoly

Risk Sharing and Adverse Selection with Asymmetric Information on Risk Preference

Jian Yao, Ilan Adler, Shmuel S. Oren,

Are Hard Budget Constraints for Sub-National GovernmentsAlwaysEfficient?

Answer Key: Problem Set 4

Transcription:

ECONS 44 STRATEGY AND GAME THEORY HOMEWORK #4 ANSWER KEY Exerise - Chapter 6 Watson Solving by bakward indution:. We start from the seond stage of the game where both firms ompete in pries. Sine market demand is Q = a - p, then produts are homogeneous, and in addition, we are told in the exerise that the firm setting the lowest prie gets all the market. Hene, we are in a Bertrand game of prie ompetition, and we know from lass that the equilibrium prie firms set is P = P = 0. Importantly, note that pries are not funtions of the expenditure on advertising that firm makes during the first period.. Sine this is the ase, firm knows that by spending more money on advertising it will not inrease the profits during the seond period. As a onsequene, a = 0 during the first period. Therefore, the subgame perfet equilibrium is a = 0 during the first stage and P = P = 0 during the seond stage.

Exerise 8 - Chapter 6 Watson a. Without payoffs, the extensive form is as follows [Note that we are using dashed lines to denote that firm hooses q without observing firm s output q. Similarly, firm hooses q without observing firm and firm s output, q and q, respetively.]: q q q E E D q q D E q q D q Solving by bakward indution, we must first find the output level of every possible entry/no entry senario. By doing so, we will be able to find the profits resulting from every possible entry/no entry senario, and then we will be ready to ompare firms profits from entering and not entering:. We first solve firms output in the subgame that starts after firm and enter. [In the figure, this subgame is the upper part, where firms are seleting q, q and q ] This is just a Cournot game of quantity ompetition with three firms ompeting with eah other by simultaneously seleting output. Hene, qq = qq = qq =. a. PROFITS: In this ase, note that the profits of every firm in this Cournot oligopoly game with three firms are: ( QQ)qq ii = ( qq qq qq )qq ii = ( ) = = 9.

b. Note that we must finally subtrat 0 (entry osts) in the profits of firm and firm (You don t have to do so for firm, sine it was already the inumbent in the market). Hene, the payoff vetor would be (9-0, 9-0, 9) = (-, -, 9). Now we solve the subgame indued after firm enters (E) but firm does not (D). Here we have a Cournot oligopoly game played by firms and (duopoly), where they simultaneously selet qq and qq. Hene, qq = qq = 4. a. PROFITS: In this ase, note that the profits of every ative firm in this Cournot oligopoly game with two firms are: ( QQ)qq ii = ( qq qq )qq ii = ( 4 4) 4 = 4 4 = 6. b. Note that we must finally subtrat 0 (entry osts) from the profits of firm (entrant), whih implies that the payoff vetor beomes (6-0, 0, 6) = (6, 0, 6).. Now we solve the subgame that starts after firm deides not to enter (D), but firm deides to enter (E ). Now we have a Cournot oligopoly game played by firms and (duopoly), where they simultaneously selet qq and qq. Hene, qq = qq = 4. a. PROFITS: In this ase, note that the profits of every ative firm in this Cournot oligopoly game with two firms are: ( QQ)qq ii = ( qq qq )qq ii = ( 4 4) 4 = 4 4 = 6. b. Note that we must finally subtrat 0 (entry osts) from the profits of firm (entrant), whih implies that the payoff vetor beomes (0, 6-0, 6) = (0, 6, 6). 4. Now we solve the subgame indued after firm deides not to enter (D) and firm deides not to enter either (D ). Here firm keeps its monopolisti position, and hooses monopoly output, qq = 6. a. PROFITS: In this ase, note that the profits of the only monopoly in the market (firm ), are: ( QQ)qq = ( 6)6 = 6 b. Note that we don t have to subtrat any entry osts from firm s profits, given that it was already the inumbent in the market. Hene, the payoff vetor in this ase is (0, 0, 6).

Plugging all the payoff vetors in the appropriate nodes (see figure at the end of the answer key), and solving by bakward indution, we see that:. Firm (last mover in this game): After observing that firm entered the market, firm deides to not enter, sine its profit from not entering (0) are higher than from entering a too rowded market (profits of -). After observing that firm didn t enter the market, firm hooses to enter, sine its profits from doing so (6, now firm would beome the only ompetitor of firm ) are higher than from not entering (0).. Firm (first mover in this game): Firm deides to enter, given that its profits from entering (and induing firm to stay out afterwards) are 6, while those from not entering (and induing firm to enter the market afterwards) are only 0. Hene, firm enters. Hene, at the subgame perfet equilibrium:. firm selets Enter,. firm hooses not to enter after observing that firm entered, but hooses to enter after observing that firm didn t enter.. Equilibrium output levels at every subgame of this game are: qq = qq = qq = qq = qq = 4 qq = qq = 4 qq = 6 b. In the subgame perfet equilibrium only firm enters, induing firm to stay out of the market. 4

Exerise 9 - Chapter 6 Watson a. The government solves: MMMMMM 0 + (pp WW ) pp pp 0 = pp WW Taking first order onditions with respet to pp, we obtain. Sine this result does not depend on pp, it is indiating that the solution to the problem is a orner solution. In partiular, given that > 0, we an onlude that the solution is the upper orner, i.e., the government sets pp as high as possible, regardless of the level of WW. So pp = 0. Knowing how the government will behave, the ASE solves: MMMMMM (WW 0) ww where we have already replaed pp = 0. The first order ondition implies: So in equilibrium y = 0. pp = WW = 0 b. If the government ould ommit ahead of time, it would solve: MMMMMM pp 0 + (pp WW) pp 0 and using the fat that pp = WW, we an rearrange the above expression to obtain MMMMMM ww pp Taking first-order onditions with respet to pp yields < 0, indiating that the solution to this maximization problem is the lower orner, i.e., the government ommits pp = 0 and the ASE would set WW = 0. In (a) u = 0 and v = -5. Now, when ommitment is possible, u = 0 and v = 0.. One way is to have a separate entral bank that does not have a politially eleted head that states its goals. 5

BONUS EXERCISE (Exessive entry in an industry) (a) Sine the equilibrium has to be found by bakward indution, first solve the last stage of the game, where firms hoose quantities given the number of firms, n, that have entered the market in the previous stage. In partiular, the n th firm entering produes an output level of n ( ) +, thus obtaining profits of π ( n) ( n + ) = F. Sine n is a real number, the equilibrium number of firms in the industry will be given by solving for n in, given that the n th entrant must be indifferent between entering and staying out. Solving for n we obtain n =. F (b) The soial planner will hoose n to maximize total welfare (the sum of onsumer and produer surplus). Let us first find onsumer surplus, CS. Notie that the CS is given by the area of the triangle between the vertial interept of the demand urve, + n, and the equilibrium prie p= n =. Hene, CS is given by n + n + ( ) CS + n = n = n. Produer surplus is simply given by the n+ n+ ( n+ ) ( ) ( ) aggregate profits all firms make in the industry, i.e., nπ ( n) = n nf. n + Therefore, the sum of onsumer and produer surplus yields a total welfare of n( ) ( n+ ) W = CS + PS = nf. Taking first-order onditions with respet to ( n + ) * n, and solving for n, we obtain ( n = ). F By omparing the optimal number of firms n* we just found with the number of firms entering at the free entry equilibrium from part (a), lear that there exists exess of entry in the industry., it is The following figure illustrates this result. In partiular, the figure depits n and n* as a funtion of F in the horizontal axis, and evaluating both of them 6

at a marginal ost of =0.5. (You an obtain similar figures using another value for firms marginal osts of prodution, ). Two important features of the figure are noteworthy. First, note that both n and n* derease in the entry osts, F. Seond, the equilibrium number of firms entering the industry, n, lies above the soially optimal number of firms, n*, for any given level of F; refleting an exessive entry in the industry when entry is unregulated. 7