Explaining the State Integrated Care and Financial Alignment Demonstrations for Dual Eligible Beneficiaries

Similar documents
kaiser medicaid and the uninsured commission on

kaiser medicaid and the uninsured commission on O L I C Y R I E F April 2012

Cost and Coverage Implications of the ACA Medicaid Expansion: National and State by State Analysis

Medicaid in an Era of Change: Findings from the Annual Kaiser 50 State Medicaid Budget Survey

States and Medicaid Provider Taxes or Fees

How is the Affordable Care Act Leading to Changes in Medicaid Today? State Adoption of Five New Options

Medicaid s Future. National PACE Association Spring Policy Forum. MaryBeth Musumeci

Alternative Paths to Medicaid Expansion

Obamacare in Pictures. Visualizing the Effects of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

Robin Rudowitz, Associate Director, Kaiser Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation

PRODUCER ANNUITY SUITABILITY TRAINING REQUIREMENTS BY STATE As of September 11, 2017

ACA and Medicaid: Current Landscape and Future Outlook

The Medicaid Landscape

SCHIP: Let the Discussions Begin

Experts Predict Sharp Decline in Competition across the ACA Exchanges

WELLCARE WINS BID IN EVERY REGION FOR 2007 AND INTRODUCES CLASSIC PLAN WITH LOWER PLAN PREMIUMS

Medicaid Expansion and Section 1115 Waivers

Medicare Alert: Temporary Member Access

Current Trends in the Medicaid RFP Procurement Landscape

2016 Workers compensation premium index rates

Obamacare in Pictures

Older consumers and student loan debt by state

Supreme Court Ruling on the Affordable Care Act (ACA): Overview & Implications

Report to Congressional Defense Committees

medicaid a n d t h e How will the Medicaid Expansion for Adults Impact Eligibility and Coverage? Key Findings in Brief

TCJA and the States Responding to SALT Limits

Medicaid Funding and Policies Is There a Medicaid Crisis? A Financial Diagnosis for State and Local Government

ehealth, Inc Fall Cost Report for Individual and Family Policyholders

CHAPTER 1. Trends in the Overall Health Care Market

How to Assist Beneficiaries Impacted by Aetna/Coventry 2015 Part D Plans

Medicare Prescription Drug Congress. MMA and Medicaid. Gale Arden Director, Disabled & Elderly Health Programs Group CMSO CMS.

Some Speech Titles Are Better Spoken Than Written. Hot Issues in Health Care December 5, 2017 Alan Weil Editor-in-Chief Health Affairs

The Impact of Health Reform s State Exchanges

Comparative Revenues and Revenue Forecasts Prepared By: Bureau of Legislative Research Fiscal Services Division State of Arkansas

The Affordable Care Act (ACA)

SCHIP Reauthorization: The Road Ahead

Percent of Employees Waiving Coverage 27.0% 30.6% 29.1% 23.4% 24.9%

Local Anesthesia Administration by Dental Hygienists State Chart

SIGNIFICANT PROVISIONS OF STATE UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE LAWS JANUARY 2008

The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company Term Portfolio

Property Tax Relief in New England

kaiser medicaid and the uninsured commission on The Cost and Coverage Implications of the ACA Medicaid Expansion: National and State-by-State Analysis

Just The Facts: On The Ground SIF Utilization

Who s Above the Social Security Payroll Tax Cap? BY NICOLE WOO, JANELLE JONES, AND JOHN SCHMITT*

A Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association Presentation

IOM Workshop The Impact of the Affordable Care Act on U.S. Preparedness Resources and Programs

Healthcare Reform. North Carolina Dietetic Association September 12, Duke Medicine

2016 GEHA. dental. FEDVIP Plans. let life happen. gehadental.com

Rebalancing in Capitated Medicaid Managed Long-Term Services and Supports Programs: Key Issues from a Roundtable Discussion on Measuring Performance

State Treatment of Social Security Treatment of Pension Income Other Income Tax Breaks Property Tax Breaks

The Acquisition of Regions Insurance Group. April 6, 2018

Implementing the Medicare Drug Benefit. Robert Donnelly Director, Medicare Drug Benefit Group June 8, 2005

Rural Policy Brief Volume 10, Number 8 (PB ) April 2006 RUPRI Center for Rural Health Policy Analysis

Tax Breaks for Elderly Taxpayers in the States in 2016

Medicaid Managed LTSS Updates from the States and the Feds

The Affordable Care Act and Childhood Asthma

Projected Savings of Medicaid Capitated Care: National and State-by-State. October 2015

Introducing LiveHealth Online

CHARTPACK. Medicaid and its Role in State/Federal Budgets & Health Reform

Medicaid 101 Damon Terzaghi Senior Director NASUAD

The State of Children s Health

Marilyn Tavenner, CMS Administrator Don Moulds, Acting Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation

State Trust Fund Solvency

Medicaid Home and Community-Based Services Programs:

Data Note: What if Per Enrollee Medicaid Spending Growth Had Been Limited to CPI-M from ?

Patient Protection and. Affordable Care Act: The Impact on Employers

Florida 1/1/2016 Workers Compensation Rate Filing

Please print using blue or black ink. Please keep a copy for your records and send completed form to the following address.

INTERIM SUMMARY REPORT ON RISK ADJUSTMENT FOR THE 2016 BENEFIT YEAR

Presented by: Matt Turkstra

2018 National Electric Rate Study

Health Reform & Immuniza3ons in 2014

Taxing Investment Income in the States New Hampshire Fiscal Policy Institute 2 nd Annual Budget and Policy Conference Concord, NH January 23, 2015

Getting Better Value for the Healthcare Dollar. National Conference of State Legislators Fall Forum November 30, 2011.

AHCA Managed Care Webinar: Tools for State Executives

Tax Freedom Day 2018 is April 19th

ANALYSIS OF THE IMPACTS OF THE ACA S TAX ON HEALTH INSURANCE IN 2018 AND BEYOND - REVISED

Florida s Medicaid Funding: A National Overview of Medicaid Waiver Trends

In addition, MCHCP is requesting information about any programs or plans in place for non-medicare retirees.

Exhibit 1. The Impact of Health Reform: Percent of Women Ages Uninsured by State

ANALYSIS OF THE IMPACTS OF THE ACA S TAX ON HEALTH INSURANCE IN YEAR 2020 AND LATER

Oregon: Where Taxes Are Low, Fees Are High and Revenue Is Slightly Below Average

Eye on the South Carolina Housing Market presented at 2008 HBA of South Carolina State Convention August 1, 2008

James G. Anderson, Ph.D. Purdue University

Unemployment Insurance Benefit Adequacy: How many? How much? How Long?

Latinas Access to Health Insurance

September Turning 65. Beyond a Rite of Passage. A nonprofit service and advocacy organization National Council on Aging

Age of Insured Discount

The Economic Stimulus and Health Chairs

Long-Term Care Education Requirements Prior to Selling

Stand-Alone Prescription Drug Plans Dominated the Rural Market in 2011

Medicaid 1915(c) Home and Community-Based Service Programs: Data Update

MARKET TRENDS: MEDICARE SUPPLEMENT. Gorman Health Group, LLC

Uniform Consent to Service of Process

State of the Automotive Finance Market

Charles Gullickson (Penn Treaty/ANIC Task Force Chair), Richard Klipstein (NOLHGA)

Schedule of Commissions

Long-Term Care Education Requirements Prior to Selling

Tax Freedom Day 2019 is April 16th

An Update on Commercial Exchanges. Myra Weisfeld, Senior Managing Consultant

Transcription:

P O L I C Y B R I E F kaiser commission on medicaid and the uninsured Explaining the State Integrated Care and Financial Alignment Demonstrations for Dual Eligible Beneficiaries October 2012 Over the last eighteen months, a number of states have been working with the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) to develop Figure 1 payment and service delivery models to 26 states have submitted demonstration proposals to integrate care and align financing for integrate care and align financing for dual eligible beneficiaries who are dually eligible for beneficiaries, June, 2012 WA* VT ME MT ND NH both the Medicare and Medicaid MN OR WI NY* MA ID SD MI programs. These efforts have resulted in WY CT* RI PA IA* NJ NE OH DE NV IL IN MD proposals from 26 states to test these UT WV VA models (Figure 1). 1 CO* MO* DC CA KS KY NC* CMS is presently TN OK* SC AZ AR NM* reviewing the states proposals to MS AL GA TX LA determine which will be implemented. FL AK This policy brief provides an overview of HI Proposed 2013 Start Date (15 states) Proposed 2014 Start Date (11 states) the proposed integrated care and financial Not participating in demonstration (24 states and DC) * CO, CT, IA, MO, and NC are proposing managed FFS models. NY, OK, and WA are proposing both capitated and managed FFS models. All others have proposed alignment demonstrations for dual eligible capitated models. NOTES: MO and MN have proposed a 2012 start date. NM s proposal is no longer active with CMS. SOURCE: CMS Financial Alignment Initiative, State Financial Alignment Proposals, http://www.cms.gov/medicare-medicaid-coordination/medicare-and-medicaidbeneficiaries and answers key questions Coordination/Medicare-Medicaid-Coordination-Office/FinancialModelstoSupportStatesEffortsinCareCoordination.html. about these new initiatives. Key Questions 1. Who are the dual eligible beneficiaries? Dual eligible beneficiaries receive both Medicare and Medicaid benefits. 2 They include over 9.1 million seniors and younger people with significant disabilities and are among the poorest and sickest beneficiaries covered by either program. Medicare is the primary payer for dual eligible beneficiaries and covers hospital, physician and post-acute services, diagnostic tests, and prescription drugs. Just over 7 million full duals receive Medicaid assistance with paying for their Medicare premiums and cost-sharing as well as services covered by Medicaid that Medicare does not cover, the most significant of which are long-term services and supports. The remaining 2 million partial duals receive Medicaid assistance with paying for their Medicare premiums and cost-sharing only. 2. Why is CMS inviting states to test new integrated care and financial alignment models for dual eligible beneficiaries? Medicare and Medicaid are separate programs, and the predominant existing delivery models typically involve little to no coordination among services. In addition, dual eligible beneficiaries account for a disproportionate share of spending in both programs, due to their poorer health status and resultant 1330 G S T R E E T NW, W A S H I N G T O N, DC 20005 P H O N E: (202) 347-5270, F A X: ( 202) 347-5274 W E B S I T E: W W W. K F F. O R G/ K C M U

higher use of services as compared to other program beneficiaries. The Affordable Care Act created two new offices within CMS that address these issues. The Medicare-Medicaid Coordination Office is charged with improving the integration of Medicare and Medicaid benefits for dual eligible beneficiaries. The Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation has new demonstration authority under 1115A of the Social Security Act to test new payment and service delivery models that fully integrate care for dual eligible beneficiaries, among other areas. 3. What models does CMS propose testing? CMS has proposed two financial models to align Medicare and Medicaid benefits for dual eligible beneficiaries that it would like to test. One is a capitated model, which involves a three-way contract between CMS, the state, and participating health plans. 3 CMS and the state will jointly select and monitor participating plans. Plans will receive a prospective blended rate for all primary, acute, behavioral health, and long-term services and supports. The Medicare and Medicaid payment rates under the capitated model are intended to allow both CMS and the state to share savings. The other is a managed fee-for-service model, which involves an agreement between CMS and the state in which the state will be responsible for dual eligible beneficiaries care coordination and the delivery of fully integrated Medicare and Medicaid benefits. In return, the state will be eligible for a retrospective performance payment if a target level of Medicare savings, net of increased federal Medicaid costs, and specified quality thresholds are met. In this model, providers will continue to be reimbursed on a feefor-service basis by CMS for Medicare services and by the state for Medicaid services. 4. What is the process for designing and testing these models? In April, 2011, CMS awarded design contracts to 15 states to develop service delivery and payment models to integrate care for dual eligible beneficiaries. 4 In July, 2011, CMS expanded this initiative by releasing a State Medicaid Director letter outlining its proposed capitated and managed fee-for-service financial alignment models and inviting any interested state to submit a non-binding letter of intent to test either or both models. 5 In spring 2012, 26 states, including the 15 that received design contracts, submitted demonstration proposals to CMS (Figure 1). CMS is presently reviewing the states proposals and working with selected states to develop memoranda of understanding (MOUs) to implement the demonstrations. The first MOU, for Massachusetts demonstration, was released in late August, 2012. 6 The demonstrations will last for three years. The states target implementation dates vary, with some states seeking to implement their demonstrations in late 2012 or in 2013, and other states seeking to implement in 2014 (Figure 1). The Secretary s 1115A authority requires her to evaluate each model that is tested. 7 The law also authorizes the Secretary to expand the duration and scope of models, including on a nationwide basis, that are expected to reduce program spending without reducing the quality of care or improve patient care without increasing spending. 5. Which dual eligible beneficiaries will be included in the demonstrations? The financial alignment models target full dual eligible beneficiaries. CMS has stated that it plans to limit total participation in the demonstrations to no more than 2 million beneficiaries. Most states propose including all full dual eligible beneficiaries statewide in their demonstrations. Other states 2

propose limiting participation in their demonstrations by age, diagnosis or service use, and/or geographic area. 6. How will dual eligible beneficiaries be enrolled in the demonstrations? CMS has stated that it will allow states to passively enroll beneficiaries in the demonstrations as long as beneficiaries have the opportunity to opt out of the demonstration on a month to month basis. This means that beneficiaries would be placed in the demonstrations, and in the capitated model, enrolled in a managed care plan, unless they take action to disenroll. Beneficiaries could opt out of the demonstrations for their Medicare benefits but still may be required to enroll in managed care for their Medicaid benefits if their state has a waiver from CMS permitting the state to require Medicaid managed care participation. Nearly all the states propose passively enrolling beneficiaries in their demonstrations. CMS and the Administration for Community Living recently announced new grant funding for State Health Insurance Assistance Programs and Aging and Disability Resource Centers to provide options counseling for beneficiaries in states that will implement demonstrations. 8 7. What benefits will the demonstrations include? CMS has stated that the demonstrations should provide integrated benefits packages that include all primary, acute, pharmacy, behavioral health, and long-term services and supports currently covered by Medicare and Medicaid. Demonstration health plans also may offer supplemental benefits that are not otherwise covered by Medicare or Medicaid. A few states propose including community health workers in their demonstration health plan integrated care teams to serve as peer navigators or assist beneficiaries with preventative care and health promotion efforts. Two states include provisions for independent coordinators for long-term services and supports. 8. What types of care coordination activities will the demonstrations provide? Most dual eligible beneficiaries currently receive their Medicare and Medicaid benefits on a fee-forservice basis. Section 1115A of the Social Security Act directs the Secretary to focus testing on payment and service delivery models that are expected to reduce program costs while preserving or enhancing the quality of care received by beneficiaries and models that also improve the coordination, quality and efficiency of care. The law includes a number of factors that CMS may consider when selecting models to test, including whether the model: -includes a regular process for monitoring and updating patient care plans consistent with beneficiary needs and preferences; -places beneficiaries, family members, and informal caregivers at the center of the care team; -provides for in-person contact with beneficiaries; -utilizes technology, such as electronic health records and patient-based remote monitoring systems, to coordinate care over time and across settings; 3

-provides for the maintenance of a close relationship between care coordinators, primary care practitioners, specialist physicians, community-based organizations, and other providers of services and suppliers; -relies on a team-based approach to interventions, such as comprehensive care assessments, care planning, and self-management coaching; -allows providers to share information with patients, caregivers and other providers on a real time basis. 9. How will the demonstrations affect the financing of Medicare and Medicaid services? CMS has stated that health plans in the capitated model will receive a prospective blended rate that includes payments from CMS for the Medicare portion of covered services and from the state for the Medicaid portion of covered services. 9 CMS has stated that it will not approve a demonstration unless the capitated rate provides upfront savings to both CMS and the state. CMS and the state will share program savings. CMS s guidance also provides for an increasing quality withhold from the plans capitated rates, of one percent in year one, two percent in year two, and three percent in year three of the demonstration. Plans would earn back the withheld amount if they meet certain quality objectives. 10. How will the demonstrations be monitored and evaluated? The law requires the Secretary to evaluate the demonstrations. The evaluation must analyze the quality of care provided, including patient level outcomes and patient-centeredness criteria, and changes in Medicare and Medicaid spending. A few states propose conducting their own evaluations of their demonstrations as well. In the capitated model, CMS and the state will jointly monitor participating health plans, which will be required to meet established quality thresholds. The specific quality measures and plan oversight requirements are to be determined in the MOU between CMS and the state and the three-way contract between CMS, the state, and the plan. Looking Ahead The integrated care and financial alignment demonstrations for dual eligible beneficiaries offer the potential opportunity to improve care coordination, lower program costs, and achieve outcomes such as the increased use of home and community-based services instead of institutionalization. At the same time, dual eligible beneficiaries high care needs increase their vulnerability when care delivery systems are changed. As the demonstrations proceed, careful attention must be paid to how beneficiaries will be notified about and enrolled in these new models, how beneficiaries continuity of care with their current providers and services will be preserved during transitions, what the sources of program savings will be, how beneficiary access to medically necessary services will be ensured, how beneficiary rights will be protected, how demonstration plans and providers will accommodate the needs of beneficiaries with disabilities, and how the demonstrations will be overseen and evaluated to monitor quality and costs. This policy brief was prepared by MaryBeth Musumeci of the Kaiser Family Foundation s Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured. 4

Endnotes 1 For a summary of the 26 states proposals to CMS, see Kaiser Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured, State Demonstrations to Integrate Care and Align Financing for Dual Eligible Beneficiaries: A Review of the 26 Proposals Submitted to CMS (Oct. 2012), available at http://www.kff.org/medicaid/8369.cfm. NM s proposal is no longer active with CMS. See CMS, Medicare-Medicaid Coordination Office, Financial Alignment Initiative, available at http://www.cms.gov/medicare-medicaid-coordination/medicare-and-medicaid-coordination/medicare-medicaid- Coordination-Office/FinancialModelstoSupportStatesEffortsinCareCoordination.html (noting that only active proposals are listed). 2 For additional background on the dual eligible population, see Kaiser Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured, Medicaid s Role for Dual Eligible Beneficiaries (April 2012), available at http://www.kff.org/medicaid/7846.cfm; Kaiser Family Foundation, Medicare s Role for Dual Eligible Beneficiaries (April 2012), available at http://www.kff.org/medicare/8138.cfm. 3 For a summary of CMS s guidance on the capitated financial alignment model, see Kaiser Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured, An Update on CMS s Capitated Financial Alignment Demonstration Model for Medicare-Medicaid Enrollees (April 2012), available at http://www.kff.org/medicaid/8290.cfm. 4 For background on the state design contract proposals, see Kaiser Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured, Proposed Models to Integrate Medicare and Medicaid Benefits for Dual Eligibles: A Look at the 15 State Design Contracts Funded by CMS (Aug. 2011), available at http://www.kff.org/medicaid/8215.cfm. 5 For background on the states letters of intent, see Kaiser Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured, Financial Alignment Models for Dual Eligibles: An Update (Nov. 2011), available at http://www.kff.org/medicaid/8260.cfm. 6 For a summary of the memorandum of understanding between CMS and Massachusetts, see Kaiser Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured, Massachusetts Demonstration to Integrate Care and Align Financing for Dual Eligible Beneficiaries (Oct. 2012), available at http://www.kff.org/medicaid/8291.cfm. 7 For a summary of CMS s 1115A demonstration authority, see Kaiser Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured, State Demonstrations to Integrate Care and Align Financing for Dual Eligible Beneficiaries: A Review of the 26 Proposals Submitted to CMS, Appendix A (Oct. 2012), available at http://www.kff.org/medicaid/8369.cfm. 8 U.S. Dep t of Health & Human Servs., CMS, Administration for Comm y Living, ACA State Health Insurance Assistance Program and Aging and Disability Resource Center Options Counseling for Medicare-Medicaid Individuals in States with Approved Financial Alignment Models (Aug. 23, 2012), available at http://www.aoa.gov/aoaroot/grants/funding/docs/2012/ship_adrc_duals_foa_final8_22_2012.pdf. 9 State Medicaid spending qualifies for federal matching funds based upon the state s Federal Medical Assistance Percentage (FMAP). For more information about the FMAP, see Kaiser Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured, Medicaid Financing: An Overview of the Federal Medicaid Matching Rate (FMAP) (Sept. 2012), available at http://www.kff.org/medicaid/8352.cfm. 5

1330 G S T R E E T NW, W A S H I N G T O N, DC 20005 P H O N E: (202) 347-5270, F A X: ( 202) 347-5274 W E B S I T E: W W W. K F F. O R G/KCMU This report (#8368) is available on the Kaiser Family Foundation s website at www.kff.org. Additional copies of this report (#0000) are available on the Kaiser Family Foundation s website at www.kff.org. The Kaiser Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured provides information and analysis on health care coverage a nd access for the low-income population, with a special focus on Medicaid's role and coverage of the uninsured. Begun in 1991 and based in the Kaiser Family Foundation's Washington, DC office, the Commission is the largest operating program of the Foundation. The Commission s work is conducted by Foundation staff under the guidance of a bi-partisan group of national leaders and experts in health care and public policy.