Capturing the Core: Transformative Acquisition of Vantage Energy Inc. September 26, 2016

Similar documents
First Quarter 2016 Supplemental Slides May 4, 2016

Rice Midstream Partners First Quarter 2016 Supplemental Slides May 4,

Third Quarter 2016 Supplemental Presentation November 2, 2016

Rice Midstream Partners First Quarter 2015 Supplemental Slides May 7, 2015

Jefferies Energy Conference November 29, 2016

Wells Fargo Pipeline, MLP and Utility Symposium December 6, 2016

Investor Presentation

Investor Presentation

Heikkinen Energy Conference August 24, 2016

Rice Midstream Partners Citi MLP Conference August 19 20, 2015

Investor Presentation TPH Hotter N Hell Energy Conference June 15, 2016

EQT Corporation Announces Acquisition of Rice Energy

Investor Relations Presentation

Investor Relations Presentation

Streamlining Transaction Summary. April 2018

Third Quarter 2016 Earnings Call Presentation October 27, 2016

Investor Presentation February 2016

EQT REPORTS SECOND QUARTER 2016 EARNINGS Increases 2016 drilling plan

Antero Resources Reports Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2016 Financial and Operational Results

Investor Relations Presentation

Investor Presentation. February 2019

Antero Resources Reports First Quarter 2018 Financial and Operating Results

Investor Presentation January

EQM & EQGP Investor Presentation

Antero Resources Reports Second Quarter 2017 Financial and Operational Results and Increases 2017 Production Guidance

Analyst Presentation. October 29, 2018

Analyst Presentation. February 15, 2018

RICE MIDSTREAM PARTNERS LP (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Second Quarter 2016 Earnings Call Presentation August 3, 2016

Fourth Quarter 2017 Earnings Presentation. February 14, 2018

Analyst Presentation. December 13, 2017

PTXP Update: Operations and Events

EQT REPORTS THIRD QUARTER 2017 EARNINGS

EQM & EQGP Investor Presentation

EQM & EQGP Investor Presentation

EQM & EQGP Investor Presentation

First Quarter 2016 Earnings Call Presentation April 28, 2016

Antero Resources Reports Second Quarter 2018 Financial and Operational Results

Second Quarter 2018 Earnings Presentation. August 2, 2018

Antero Resources Reports Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2018 Financial and Operational Results and 2018 Reserves

Partnership Overview December 2017

Third Quarter 2018 Earnings Call Presentation NOVEMBER 1, 2018

Analyst Presentation November 2016

First Quarter 2017 Earnings Call Presentation May 9, 2017

Analyst Presentation October 27, 2016

Analyst Presentation. March 2018

EQT REPORTS SECOND QUARTER 2018 RESULTS Board authorizes $500 million share repurchase program

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C FORM 8-K

Antero Resources Reports First Quarter 2017 Financial and Operational Results

Analyst Presentation. May 2018

Antero Resources Reports Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2017 Financial and Operating Results

SOUTHWESTERN ENERGY ANNOUNCES SECOND QUARTER 2017 FINANCIAL AND OPERATING RESULTS

EQT REPORTS THIRD QUARTER 2014 EARNINGS Operational Results Continue to Improve GP Achieves Maximum Distribution Threshold

Antero Resources Announces 2015 Capital Budget and Guidance

Antero Resources Reports First Quarter 2013 Results

Antero Resources Reports Fourth Quarter and Year- End 2013 Financial and Operating Results

EQT Reports Record Earnings for 2013 Production Sales Volume Growth of 43%

EQT Announces Plan to Separate Midstream Business. February 21, 2018

Antero Midstream Reports Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2016 Financial and Operational Results

CONE Midstream Partners LP. Citi 2015 MLP/Midstream Infrastructure Conference August 19-20, 2015

EARNINGS RESULTS FOURTH QUARTER 2016

Fourth Quarter 2017 Earnings Call Presentation FEBRUARY 14, 2018

Partnership Overview September 2017

3Q17 Earnings Call November 2, 2017

SOUTHWESTERN ENERGY ANNOUNCES FIRST QUARTER 2018 RESULTS

EQT REPORTS SECOND QUARTER 2014 EARNINGS

where we stand where we are going

where we stand where we are going

Citi MLP Conference August 16, 2017

Partnership Overview August 2017

Utica Acquisition Overview June 2015

Partnership Overview March 2017

Investor Roadshow Presentation. October/November 2018

MLPA 2017 Investor Conference June 1, 2017

Antero Resources Reports Third Quarter 2013 Financial and Operational Results

Antero Resources Reports Third Quarter 2013 Financial and Operational Results

EQT Reports Second Quarter 2012 Earnings

Analyst Presentation. July 27, 2017

Second Quarter 2018 Earnings Call Presentation AUGUST 2, 2018

Partnership Overview June 2017

EQT REVISED 2015 OPERATIONAL FORECAST

Credit Suisse 24 th Annual Energy Summit Bill Way, President and CEO NYSE: SWN

EQT Reports First Quarter 2012 Earnings

CONE Midstream Partners LP. Capital Link MLP Investing Forum March 5, 2015

Analyst Presentation October 22, 2015

Antero Resources Reports Second Quarter 2013 Financial Results, Utica First Production and Well Rates

SOUTHWESTERN ENERGY ANNOUNCES THIRD QUARTER 2018 RESULTS. Operational outperformance captures increasing value from high quality liquids portfolio

Third Quarter 2018 Earnings Presentation. November 1, 2018

SOUTHWESTERN ENERGY ANNOUNCES CAPITAL PROGRAM AND GUIDANCE FOR 2009

Antero Midstream and AMGP Report Second Quarter 2018 Financial and Operating Results

Rex Energy Exceeds Third Quarter Production Guidance and Discloses Initial Horizontal Utica Shale Well Results

Antero Midstream Announces Acquisition of Water Business, Private Placement of Common Units & Increased Guidance

EV Energy Partners, L.P. Citi MLP/Midstream Infrastructure Conference

4Q Quarterly Update. February 19, 2019

Partnership Overview February 2017

Fayetteville Shale Transaction

EV Energy Partners, L.P J.P. Morgan Global High Yield and Leveraged Finance Conference

GHS 100 Energy Conference. June 24, 2014

DUG East Tim Dugan Chief Operating Officer, CONSOL Energy

3Q Quarterly Update. October 30, 2018

Transcription:

RICE MIDSTREAM PARTNERS Capturing the Core: Transformative Acquisition of Vantage Energy Inc. September 26, 2016 1 www.riceenergy.com

Acquisition Summary Enhancing Core, Dry-Gas Position in Appalachia Transaction On September 26, 2016 Rice Energy and Rice Midstream Partners announced the acquisition of Vantage Energy for total consideration of $2.7 billion RICE will acquire Vantage s upstream assets for $2.1 billion RMP will acquire Vantage s midstream assets for $600 million PA OH WV WEST VIRGINIA Upstream Assets ~85,000 net Marcellus acres in Greene County, PA (1) 462 net locations that generate 110% IRRs at strip (2) 50% of Marcellus acreage is held (HBP/HBO) or owned in fee No significant leasehold obligations until 2019+ 99% operated and 84% 8/8ths net revenue interest ~52,000 net PA Utica acres (113 net locations) ~37,000 net Barnett acres 399 MMcfe/d 2Q16 net production 268 MMcfe/d Appalachia, 131 MMcfe/d Barnett Midstream Assets 100% of PA acreage will be dedicated to RMP for gathering, compression and water infrastructure Midstream assets include dry gas gathering and compression systems 30 miles of dry gas gathering pipeline with >400 MMcf/d capacity 7,100 horsepower of compression 313 MMcf/d 1H16 throughput (3) RICE Acreage Vantage Acreage Anticipated Closing Q4 2016 1. Includes ~5,000 net royalty acres, the majority of which are leased to RICE. 2. Strip pricing as of 7/29/16, 2016 estimated well cost of $850 per lateral foot. 3. Includes 52 MMcf/d attributable to Vantage s joint venture partner s interest in the system. Vantage closed on the acquisition of its joint venture partner s interest in the system in September 2016. 2 www.riceenergy.com

Strategic Acquisition Consistent with RICE s Strategy Core acquisition with organic upside potential Increases RICE s acreage by ~55% (1) Increases Marcellus locations by ~95% Positions RICE as largest acreage holder in Greene County Creates 20,000-40,000 acres of in-fill leasehold opportunities Expands high return inventory of drilling locations by ~66% Single well returns of ~110% (2) with low F&D cost of ~$0.50/Mcf RICE s operational scale allows for seamless integration Operate development program of 45 net wells per year Washington Vantage Energy Inc. ~174,000 effective net acres ~85,000 PA Marcellus (3) ~52,000 PA Utica ~37,000 Barnett 399 MMcfe/d 2Q16 net production 268 MMcfe/d Appalachia 131 MMcfe/d Barnett Leasehold is ~50% held or owned in fee No significant HPB or leasehold obligations until 2019+ High average 8/8ths NRI of approximately 84% Extends RMP s 20% distribution growth target through 2023 Increases RMP s acreage dedication by ~67% Leading midstream footprint across southwest Appalachia 100% of acreage dedicated to RMP, strengthening organic project backlog Expanded footprint increases third-party midstream opportunities Immediately accretive and credit enhancing to both E&P and RMP Accretive to RICE s NAV per share and E&P cash flow per share RICE s 2020E IDR cash flow increases by $10MM 5-10% accretive to RMP s 2017E distributable cash flow per unit Greene RICE Acreage Vantage Acreage 1. Excludes PA Utica and Barnett acreage. 2. Marcellus single well returns and strip pricing as of 7/29/16, 2016 estimated well cost of $850 per lateral foot. 3. Includes ~5,000 net royalty acres, the majority of which are leased to RICE. 3 www.riceenergy.com

Proven Acreage with Consistent Results Cumulative Production (Mcf) Vantage s 72 producing Marcellus wells derisk the acquired asset base Consistent results indicate uniform shale properties across position EUR s of 2.16 Bcf/1,000 consistent with RICE s Marcellus development Single well returns of ~110% at strip pricing (1) Development visibility through 2017 via wells in progress, permits in hand and contiguous, drill-ready acreage Combined acreage further enhances capital efficiency at RICE and RMP in 2017 and beyond Maximizes development economics via longer laterals, more wells per pad and more pads per development run Integrated upstream/midstream development schedule to minimize midstream capex spend and leasehold extensions 12,000,000 10,000,000 8,000,000 6,000,000 4,000,000 2,000,000 - PA Marcellus Cumulative Production versus Time (2) Vantage Wells RICE Wells Peer Wells 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 Days Online LEGEND RICE Acreage Combining the Two Most Effective Marcellus Producers in SW PA 1. Strip pricing as of 7/29/16, 2016 estimated well cost of $850 per lateral foot. 2. Data for RICE based on actuals through 7/6/16, peer data based on Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection production reports through 5/1/16. Producing Marcellus Wells SW PA Vantage Acreage RICE Wells Vantage Wells Peer Wells 4 www.riceenergy.com

RICE s Proven Approach is Repeatable on the Acquired Assets Since IPO, RICE has efficiently developed and grown its core dry gas E&P and midstream assets By following the same playbook with the same team, RICE intends to replicate its success on the acquired asset base Core Focus Areas Appalachia Net Core (1) Acres Appalachia Net Production, MMcfe/d Midstream Throughput (MDth/d) IPO Jan 2014 Washington, PA Greene, PA Belmont, OH To Date 2Q16 To Date 2Q16 Greene, PA Opportunity Set Through 2020 90,000 151,000 85,000 > 120,000 (3) 209 758 268 > 700 ~275 1,592 313 > 1,000 (4) (2) Acquisition Size, Quality and Opportunity Set Bear an Uncanny Resemblance to Rice Energy in 2014 1. Excludes PA Utica. 2. Includes ~5,000 net royalty acres, the majority of which are leased to RICE. 3. Appalachian production only. 4. Represents 1H16 average throughput of 313 MMcf/d. Includes 52 MMcf/d attributable to Vantage s joint venture partner s interest in the system. Vantage closed on the acquisition of its joint venture partner s interest in the system in September 2016. 5 www.riceenergy.com

Compelling Pro Forma Company Profile 2016E Production 720-740 MMcfe/d 35 MMcfe/d (1) 755-775 MMcfe/d 2017E Production 900-955 MMcfe/d 380-400 MMcfe/d 1,280-1,355 MMcfe/d 2016E Upstream Capex 2017E Upstream Capex $560MM D&C $125MM Land $700-775MM D&C $130-150MM Land $40MM D&C (1) $10MM Land (1) $250-350MM D&C $30-40MM Land $600MM D&C $135MM Land $950-1,125MM D&C $160-190MM Land ~70%YoY Growth Appalachia Net Acres (2) 151,000 acres 85,000 acres (3) 231,000 acres Appalachia Locations (2) 702 462 1,164 Marcellus EUR (Bcf/1,000 ) 2.16 2.16 2.16 Enterprise Value $6.3B $2.7B $9.0B YE 2017E Net Debt / Adj. EBITDAX (4) 2.6x N/A 2.2x Note: Market data as of 9/23/2016 1. Vantage 2016 estimates assume 11/15/2016 close. 2. Excludes PA Utica. 3. Includes ~5,000 net royalty acres, the majority of which are leased to RICE. 4. Please see Adjusted EBITDAX Reconciliation for reconciliations to comparable GAAP financial measures. 6 www.riceenergy.com

Rice Energy Unique Combination of Size, Growth and Returns >$7B Enterprise Value Peer 1 Peer 2 Peer 3 Peer 4 Peer 5 Peer 6 >50% 2017E Growth >225,000 Core Dry Acres >1,000 Core Dry Locations <2.5x Net Debt /Adj. EBITDAX Retained Midstream GP Ownership (1) Note: Peers include AR, CNX, COG, EQT, GPOR and RRC. Based on Factset Research and management estimates as of September 23, 2016. 1. Please see Adjusted EBITDAX for reconciliations to comparable GAAP financial measures. 7 www.riceenergy.com

Acquisition Structure and Financing Overview KEYTRANSACTION DETAILS $2.7B consideration privately negotiated with Vantage consisting of $1.72B cash and $980MM RICE equity issued to Vantage s sponsors (1) Ascribed $2.1B upstream and $600MM midstream valuation $1B financings under-levers RICE s balance sheet and positions RICE to capture an additional 20,000 40,000 acres of leasehold RICE revolver upsized from $750MM to $1B Expect to further upsize revolver incorporating Vantage assets by YE16 RMP intends to fund the midstream asset acquisition through borrowings under its revolving credit facility and either potential equity and debt financings prior to closing, or the issuance to RICE of up to $250MM RMP common units Transaction includes 99 MDth/d and 257 MDth/d of 4Q16 and 2017 Waha/ Dominion hedges at a wtd. avg. price of $2.45/MMBtu and $2.44/MMBtu RMP revolver upsized from $450MM to $850MM Vantage will receive one board seat Expect to close in 4Q16 PRO FORMA CAPITALIZATION ($MM) June 30, 2016 Adjusted PF 6/30/16 Cash Rice Energy $513 ($120) $393 Rice Midstream Holdings $38 - $38 Rice Midstream Partners $15 - $15 Total consolidated cash $566 - $446 Mezzanine equity $373 - $373 Long-term debt Rice Energy E&P credit facility - - - 6.25% Senior notes due 2022 $900 - $900 7.25% Senior notes due 2023 $397 - $397 Total Rice Energy debt $1,297 - $1,297 Rice Midstream Holdings credit facility $25 - $25 Rice Midstream Partners credit facility - $350 $350 Total consolidated debt $1,322 $350 $1,672 Net debt $757 $350 $1,226 Net Debt/LTM EBITDA E&P 1.8x 1.4x RICE Consolidated 1.3x 1.5x YE17 Target <2.0x <2.5x Purchase Price $2,700 RICE $2,100 RMP $600 SOURCES AND USES Sources ($MM) Uses ($MM) RICE Equity to Public $1,000 Upstream $1,400 RICE Equity to Vantage 980 Midstream 600 RICE Cash on Hand 120 Repay Vantage Debt 700 RMP Units/Financing Proceeds 250 RMP Revolver 350 Total Sources $2,700 Total Uses $2,700 Liquidity E&P RCF availability $750 $250 $1,000 Rice Midstream Holdings RCF availability $325 - $325 Rice Midstream Partners RCF availability $450 $50 $500 Letters of Credit ($214) - ($214) Total consolidated cash $566 ($120) $446 Total liquidity $1,877 $180 $2,057 1. Equity consideration paid to Vantage owners will be in the form of membership interests in Rice Energy Appalachia, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Rice Energy Inc., that are immediately exchangeable for approximately 39.1 million shares of Rice Energy Inc. common stock, allowing for tax deferral of the equity portion of the consideration. 8 www.riceenergy.com

Rice Midstream Partners (NYSE:RMP) 9 www.riceenergy.com

Acquisition Expands Core Midstream Footprint Core Acquisition Adjacent to Existing RMP Infrastructure Highly complementary to existing infrastructure and acreage dedication Assets include dry gas gathering and compression systems PA OH WV WEST VIRGINIA Vantage Energy Inc. ~132,000 effective dedicated acres ~80,000 PA Marcellus (1) ~52,000 PA Utica 313 MMcf/d 1H16 throughput (2) Increases RMP s acreage dedication by ~67% Leading midstream footprint across southwest Appalachia 100% acreage dedicated to RMP, strengthening organic project backlog Will fall under the existing RICE/RMP GGA and have the same fee structure Provides optionality on emerging PA Utica Washington Extends RMP s 20% distribution growth target through 2023 Project backlog adds 462 Marcellus locations to RICE inventory Expanded midstream footprint increases opportunities to provide third-party gathering and water services Greene TETCO Maintains Financial Strength 5-10% accretive to RMP s 2017E distributable cash flow per unit Targeting <2.25x YE16 RMP leverage Ample liquidity and financial flexibility to support future investments Legend Acquisition Significantly Adds to RMP s Highly Visible Growth 1. Excludes ~5,000 net royalty acres, the majority of which are leased to RICE. 2. Includes 52 MMcf/d attributable to Vantage s joint venture partner s interest in the system. Vantage closed on the acquisition of its joint venture partner s interest in the system in September 2016. RICE Acreage Vantage Acreage 3 rd Party Dedicated to RMP RMP Gathering Pipeline RMP Water Pipeline Vantage Pipeline Vantage Water Pipeline 10 www.riceenergy.com

Rice Midstream Partners Pro Forma Midstream Guidance 2017E Throughput 900-950 MDth/d 370-390 MDth/d 1,270-1,340 MDth/d 2017E Water Volumes 900-1,000MM gallons 175-225MM gallons 1,075-1,225MM gallons 2017E EBITDA (1) $135-145MM $40-50MM $175-195MM 2017E Growth Capex $150-180MM $150-180MM $300-360MM Appalachia Acreage Dedication (2) 119,000 acres 80,000 acres (3) 199,000 acres 2017E DCF/LP unit Accretion N/A N/A 5-10% 1. New acreage dedication will fall under the existing RICE & RMP Gas Gathering Agreement with the same fee structure. 2. Excludes PA Utica. 3. Excludes ~5,000 net royalty acres, the majority of which are leased to RICE. 11 www.riceenergy.com

Pro Forma Midstream Guidance Increasing 2016 throughput to 935 MDth/d representing ~45% annual growth from 2015 Increasing 2016E EBITDA to $135 - $145MM; 120% growth from 2015 Increasing 2016E DCF to $115 - $125MM; 110% growth from 2015 RMP 2016E capex remains unchanged ~120% Annual Growth $13 $17 $16 $19 EBITDA (1) ($MM) $64 $42 $38 1Q15 2Q15 3Q15 4Q15 2015 1Q16 2Q16 Pro Vantage Forma 2016E CASH DISTRIBUTIONS ($/UNIT) $135 - $145 ~45% Annual Growth 175 THROUGHPUT (MDTH/D) 391 647 835 934 935 2013 2014 2015 1Q16 2Q16 Pro Vantage Forma 2016E DISTRIBUTABLE CASH FLOW (1) ($MM) DCF COVERAGE (1) ~110% Annual Growth $57 $115 - $125 2016E 20% Distribution Growth to $0.9210 $0.1965 $0.1935 $0.1905 $0.1875 $0.2100 $0.2235 2016 Guidance of 1.5x 1.6x 1.16x 1.02x 1.38x 1.25x 1.22x 2.58x 1.86x 1.55x $38 $34 $11 $15 $14 $17 Vantage Note: Vantage 2016 estimates assume 11/15/2016 close. 1. Please see Adjusted EBITDA and DCF Reconciliation for reconciliations to comparable GAAP financial measures. 12 www.riceenergy.com

Rice Midstream Partners Premier Appalachian MLP 20%+ 2017E Distribution Growth Peer 1 Peer 2 Peer 3 Peer 4 >1.3x 2017E Coverage <3.0x YE17E Leverage Note: Peers include AM, CNNX, DM and EQM. Based on Factset Research and public company estimates as of September 23, 2016. 13 www.riceenergy.com

Acquisition Structure and Financing Overview 14 www.riceenergy.com KEYTRANSACTION DETAILS RMP will acquire midstream assets from RICE for $600MM RMP intends to fund the midstream asset acquisition through borrowings under its revolving credit facility and either potential equity and debt financings prior to closing, or the issuance to RICE of up to $250MM RMP common units Purchase Price $600 SOURCES AND USES Sources ($MM) Uses ($MM) RMP Units/Financing Proceeds 250 Acquisition of Vista 600 RMP Revolver 350 Total Sources $600 Total Uses $600 RMP revolver upsized from $450MM to $850MM Expect to close in 4Q16 PRO FORMA CAPITALIZATION ($MM) June 30, 2016 Adjusted PF 6/30/16 Rice Midstream Partners Cash $15 - $15 Rice Midstream Partners RCF - $350 $350 Rice Midstream Partners Net Debt ($15) $350 $335 Net Debt/LTM EBITDA RMP 0.0x 2.1x RICE Consolidated 1.3x 1.5x YE17 Target <3.0x <2.5x Liquidity Revolving Credit Facility $450 $400 $850 Less: Amount Drawn - ($350) ($350) Plus: Cash on hand $15 $15 Total liquidity $465 $50 $515

Rice Energy Strategy 15 www.riceenergy.com Allocate 100% of Capital to Core Assets with Attractive Returns Maintain a Strong Balance Sheet Protect Returns and Balance Sheet through FT Portfolio and Systematic Hedging Strategically Position Midstream to Maximize Value Promote Operational Excellence through Innovation, Safety and Environmental Stewardship Long-Term Shareholder Value Creation

Appendix 16 www.riceenergy.com

IRR Attractive Single Well Economics RICE continues to drive down D&C and operating costs to maximize returns Inventory currently generates ~95% returns at strip; HHUB PV10 breakevens of ~$1.90 HHUB (1) DRY GAS SINGLE WELL ECONOMICS 150% 125% Current Strip 124% 100% Marcellus @ 2016E Avg. Well Costs 83% 114% 75% Utica @ 2016E Avg. Well Costs 77% 50% 49% 47% YE 2015 Well Cost Assumption 25% 25% 23% NYMEX ($/MMBtu) $2.50 $3.00 $3.50 $4.00 Marcellus Utica Net Locations (2) 487 168 HHUB PV-10 Breakeven ($/MMBtu) $2.08 $2.18 Returns at Strip Pricing (1) Note: See Appendix for assumptions used to generate single well returns. Marcellus and Utica economics assume E&P is burdened by 50% of the gathering and compression fee and 50% of water completion fees (RICE owns a 33% LP interest in RMP, 100% of Rice Ohio Midstream and 91.75% of RMP IDRs). Assumes long-term well costs of $1,150 per lateral foot and $1,450 per lateral foot in the Marcellus and Utica, respectively. 1. Strip as of 7/29/16, 2016 estimated well costs of $850 per lateral foot and $1,275 per lateral foot in the Marcellus and Utica, respectively. 2. Excludes ~47 wet OH Utica net undeveloped locations and ~105 dry gas PA Utica net undeveloped locations. 17 www.riceenergy.com

Pro Forma Hedging Summary RICE acquires Vantage s Dominion and Waha hedges 4Q16: 99 MDth/d of swaps at average floor of $2.45 (1) 2017: 257 MDth/d of swaps at average floor of $2.44 RICE s gas will be marketed into 4 areas (1) Gulf Coast (ELA, M1) (2) TCO (3) Midwest (Chicago, Dawn) (4) Appalachia (M2, M3, & Dominion) ~60% of fourth quarter 2016 production transported out of Appalachian basin Our Gulf Coast firm transportation contracts deliver to markets in the Gulf Coast (ELA, M1) We hedge our Gulf Coast basis exposure opportunistically, but believe our Henry Hub NYMEX derivatives serve as a hedge against these indices which have historically traded within a narrow band of $0.05-$0.15 below Henry Hub HEDGE SUMMARY 4Q16 2017 2018 2019 2020 Hedged M2 / Dominion Volumes (BBtu/d) 264 329 279 292 292 Wtd Avg Floor Price ($/MMBtu) $2.27 $2.22 $2.37 $2.41 $2.48 % of Basis Hedged 69% n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. Hedged TCO Volumes (BBtu/d) 75 55 19 10 Wtd Avg Floor Price ($/MMBtu) $3.02 $2.85 $2.67 $2.60 % of Basis Hedged 48% n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. Hedged Gulf Coast Volumes (BBtu/d) 469 508 339 122 42 Wtd Avg Floor Price ($/MMBtu) $3.17 $3.05 $3.00 $2.87 $2.89 % of Basis Hedged 55% n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. Hedged Chicago/Dawn Volumes (BBtu/d) 84 40 35 25 20 Wtd Avg Floor Price ($/MMBtu) $3.25 $3.08 $2.98 $2.86 $2.92 % of Basis Hedged 100% n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. Total Hedged Volumes (BBtu/d) 892 932 672 449 354 Wtd Avg Floor Price ($/MMBtu) (2) $2.90 $2.74 $2.73 $2.56 $2.55 (3) HHUB Swap, Collar & Put Floor ($/MMBtu) $3.26 $3.10 $3.07 $2.98 $3.04 % Hedged 100% 67% n.a. n.a. n.a. 1. Assumes 11/15/16 transaction close. 2. Includes the effect of basis hedges. 3. Wtd. avg. fixed price floor. ~100% of 4Q16 Production Hedged at HHUB Floor Price of $3.26/MMBtu 18 www.riceenergy.com

Pro Forma Hedging Detail 19 www.riceenergy.com FIXED PRICE HEDGES All-In Fixed Price Derivatives 4Q16 2017 2018 2019 2020 NYMEX Natural Gas Swaps Volume Hedged (BBtu/d) 715 360 230 223 173 Wtd. Avg. Swap Price ($/MMbtu) $3.28 $3.20 $2.99 $2.99 $3.04 NYMEX Natural Gas Collars Volume Hedged (BBtu/d) 40 260 280 170 Wtd. Avg. Call Price ($/MMbtu) $3.58 $3.62 $3.62 $3.52 Wtd. Avg. Floor Price ($/MMbtu) $2.89 $3.09 $3.16 $3.00 NYMEX Natural Gas Calls Volume Hedged (BBtu/d) 60 120 110 135 Wtd. Avg. Call Price ($/MMbtu) $3.50 $3.32 $3.55 $3.47 NYMEX Natural Gas Deferred Puts Volume Hedged (BBtu/d) 55 30 20 Wtd. Avg. Net Floor Price ($/MMbtu) $2.50 $2.77 $2.80 Total NYMEX Index Derivatives NYMEX Volume Hedged (BBtu/d) 755 675 540 413 173 NYMEX Volume Hedged Incl. Calls (BBtu/d) 755 735 660 523 308 Swap, Collar & Put Floor ($/MMbtu) $3.26 $3.10 $3.07 $2.98 $3.04 WAHA Natural Gas Swaps Volume Hedged (BBtu/d) 29 57 22 9 Wtd. Avg. Swap Price ($/MMbtu) $3.04 $3.07 $3.01 $3.29 Dominion Natural Gas Swaps Volume Hedged (BBtu/d) 108 200 110 27 Wtd. Avg. Swap Price ($/MMbtu) $2.35 $2.26 $2.33 $2.58 Total Index Derivatives Total Fixed Volume Hedged (BBtu/d) 892 932 672 449 173 Total Fixed Volume Hedged Incl. Calls (BBtu/d) 892 992 792 559 308 Swap, Collar & Put Floor ($/MMbtu) $3.14 $2.92 $2.94 $2.96 $3.04 BASIS HEDGES Basis Contract Derivatives 4Q16 2017 2018 2019 2020 Dominion / M2 / M3 Basis Swaps Volume Hedged (BBtu/d) 135 129 165 240 247 Wtd. Avg. Swap Price ($/MMbtu) ($1.08) ($0.96) ($0.67) ($0.59) ($0.55) TCO Basis Swaps Volume Hedged (BBtu/d) 75 55 19 10 Wtd. Avg. Swap Price ($/MMbtu) ($0.24) ($0.25) ($0.40) ($0.38) Midcon / Michcon Basis Swaps Volume Hedged (BBtu/d) 74 30 26 25 20 Wtd. Avg. Swap Price ($/MMbtu) ($0.01) ($0.05) ($0.13) ($0.12) ($0.12) Gulf Basis Swaps Volume Hedged (BBtu/d) 175 113 59 10 Wtd. Avg. Swap Price ($/MMbtu) ($0.10) ($0.08) ($0.06) ($0.10) Physical Triggered Basis 4Q16 2017 2018 2019 2020 Appalachian Fixed Basis (Physical) Volume Hedged (BBtu/d) 21 4 25 45 Wtd. Avg. Swap Price ($/MMbtu) ($0.79) ($0.58) ($0.58) ($0.61) MichCon Fixed Basis (Physical) Volume Hedged (BBtu/d) 10 10 8 Wtd. Avg. Swap Price ($/MMbtu) $0.05 $0.05 $0.05 Gulf Coast Fixed Basis (Physical) Volume Hedged (BBtu/d) 121 137 117 92 42 Wtd. Avg. Swap Price ($/MMbtu) ($0.14) ($0.13) ($0.15) ($0.16) ($0.15) Total Basis Hedges App 156 129 169 265 292 TCO 75 55 19 10 MichCon / Dawn 84 40 35 25 20 Gulf Coast 296 250 175 102 42 Total Basis 611 474 398 402 354

Non-GAAP Financial Measures 20 www.riceenergy.com Adjusted EBITDAX and Further Adjusted EBITDAX Adjusted EBITDAX and Further Adjusted EBITDAX are supplemental non-gaap financial measures that are used by management and external users of RICE s consolidated financial statements, such as industry analysts, investors, lenders and rating agencies. RICE defines Adjusted EBITDAX as net income (loss) before non-controlling interest; interest expense; income taxes; depreciation, depletion and amortization; amortization of deferred financing costs; amortization of intangible assets; derivative fair value (gain) loss, excluding net cash receipts on settled derivative instruments; non-cash stock compensation expense; noncash incentive unit expense; exploration expenses; and other non-recurring items. RICE defines Further Adjusted EBIDAX as Adjusted EBIDAX after non-controlling interest and water revenue adjustment. Neither Adjusted EBITDAX nor Further Adjusted EBITDAX is a measure of net income as determined by United States generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP. Management believes Adjusted EBITDAX is useful because it allows them to more effectively evaluate RICE s operating performance and compare the results of RICE s operations from period to period and against its peers without regard to its financing methods or capital structure. RICE excludes the items listed above from net income (loss) in arriving at Adjusted EBITDAX because these amounts can vary substantially from company to company within the industry depending upon accounting methods and book values of assets, capital structures and the method by which the assets were acquired. Management believes Further Adjusted EBITDAX is useful because it allows them to assess the level of consolidated leverage of the company and compare this level to peers. The adjustments made to Adjusted EBITDAX to calculate Further Adjusted EBITDAX address the intercompany eliminations of items impacting Adjusted EBITDAX as a result of the consolidation of RMP, the outstanding indebtedness of which is consolidated with that of the company without regard to non-controlling interest. These adjustments include the addition of non-controlling interest as well as a water revenue adjustment attributable to charges for fresh water delivery services and produced water hauling services provided by RMP to the company, a charge that generates revenue for RMP but does not have a corresponding expense at the company level, as such costs are capitalized. Adjusted EBITDAX and Further Adjusted EBITDAX should not be considered as alternatives to, or more meaningful than, net income as determined in accordance with GAAP or as indicators of RICE s operating performance or liquidity. Certain items excluded from Adjusted EBITDAX and Further Adjusted EBITDAX are significant components in understanding and assessing a company s financial performance, such as a company s cost of capital and tax structure, as well as the historic costs of depreciable assets, none of which are components of Adjusted EBITDAX or Further Adjusted EBITDAX. RICE s computations of Adjusted EBITDAX and Further Adjusted EBITDAX may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures of other companies. RICE believes that these measures are a widely followed measures of operating performance used by investors. Adjusted EBITDA, Distributable Cash Flow and DCF Coverage Ratio Adjusted EBITDA is a supplemental non-gaap financial measure that is used by management and external users of our consolidated financial statements, such as securities analysts, investors and lenders. We define Adjusted EBITDA as net income (loss) before interest expense, depreciation expense, amortization expense, non-cash stock compensation expense, amortization of deferred financing costs and other non-recurring items. Adjusted EBITDA is not a measure of net income as determined by GAAP. Distributable cash flow and DCF coverage ratio are supplemental non-gaap financial measures that are used by management and external users of our consolidated financial statements, such as securities analysts, investors and lenders. We define distributable cash flow as Adjusted EBITDA less cash interest expense, and estimated maintenance capital expenditures. We define DCF coverage ratio as distributable cash flow divided by total distributions declared. Distributable cash flow does not reflect changes in working capital balances and is not a presentation made in accordance with GAAP. Adjusted EBITDA, distributable cash flow and DCF coverage ratio are non-gaap supplemental financial measures that management and external users of our consolidated financial statements, such as industry analysts, investors, lenders and rating agencies, may use to assess the financial performance of our assets, without regard to financing methods, capital structure or historical cost basis; our operating performance and return on capital as compared to other companies in the midstream energy sector, without regard to historical cost basis or, in the case of Adjusted EBITDA, financing or capital structure; our ability to incur and service debt and fund capital expenditures; the ability of our assets to generate sufficient cash flow to make distributions to our unitholders; and the viability of acquisitions and other capital expenditure projects and the returns on investment of various investment opportunities. We believe that the presentation of Adjusted EBITDA, distributable cash flow and DCF coverage ratio will provide useful information to investors in assessing our financial condition and results of operations. The GAAP measures most directly comparable to Adjusted EBITDA and distributable cash flow are net income and net cash provided by (used in) operating activities. Our non-gaap financial measures of Adjusted EBITDA and distributable cash flow should not be considered as an alternative to GAAP net income or net cash provided by operating activities. Each of Adjusted EBITDA and distributable cash flow has important limitations as an analytical tool because it excludes some but not all items that affect net income and net cash provided by operating activities. You should not consider Adjusted EBITDA, distributable cash flow or DCF coverage ratio in isolation or as a substitute for analysis of our results as reported under GAAP. Because Adjusted EBITDA and distributable cash flow and DCF coverage ratio may be defined differently by other companies in our industry, our definitions of Adjusted EBITDA, distributable cash flow and DCF coverage ratio may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of other companies, thereby diminishing its utility. We have not provided projected net income or net cash provided by operating activities or reconciliations of its projected Adjusted EBITDA and projected distributable cash flow to projected net income and projected net cash provided by operating activities, respectively, the most comparable financial measures calculated in accordance with GAAP. We are unable to project net cash provided by operating activities because this metric includes the impact of changes in operating assets and liabilities related to the timing of cash receipts and disbursements that may not relate to the period in which the operating activities occurred. We are unable to project these timing differences with any reasonable degree of accuracy to a specific day, three or more months in advance. Therefore, we are unable to provide projected net cash provided by operating activities, or the related reconciliation of projected distributable cash flow to projected net cash provided by operating activities. In addition, we are unable to project net income because this metric includes the impact of certain non-cash items such as depreciation expense that we are unable to project with any reasonable degree of accuracy without unreasonable effort. Therefore, we are unable to provide projected net income, or the related reconciliation of projected Adjusted EBITDA to projected net income. Further, we do not provide guidance with respect to the intra-year timing of our capital spending, which impact debt and equity and equity earnings, among other items, that are reconciling items between Adjusted EBITDA and net income. The timing of capital expenditures is volatile as it depends on weather, regulatory approvals, contractor availability, system performance and various other items. We provide a range for the forecasts of Adjusted EBITDA and distributable cash flow to allow for the variability in the timing of spending and the impact on the related reconciling items, many of which interplay with each other. Therefore, the reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to projected net income is not available without unreasonable effort.

RICE 2Q 2016 Adjusted EBITDAX Reconciliation Three Months Ended ($ in thousands) June 30, 2016 Adjusted EBITDAX reconciliation to net income (loss): Net loss ($138,709) Interest expense 24,802 Depreciation, depletion and amortization 84,752 Amortization of deferred financing costs 1,618 Amortization of intangible assets 403 Acquisition expense 84 Loss on derivative instruments (1) 201,555 Net cash receipts on settled derivative instruments (1) 67,393 Non-cash stock compensation expense 6,232 Non-cash incentive unit expense 14,840 Income tax benefit (120,496) Exploration expense 5,548 Acquisition break up fee (1,939) Other expense 2,593 Non-controlling interest (17,977) Adjusted EBITDAX $130,699 Non-controlling interest 17,977 Water revenue adjustment 10,554 Further Adjusted EBITDAX $159,230 Note: See slide 20 for important disclosures regarding non-gaap financial measures. 1. The adjustments for the derivative fair value (gains) losses and net cash receipts on settled commodity derivative instruments have the effect of adjusting net income (loss) for changes in the fair value of derivative instruments, which are recognized at the end of each accounting period because we do not designate commodity derivative instruments as accounting hedges. This results in reflecting commodity derivative gains and losses within Adjusted EBITDAX on a cash basis during the period the derivatives settled. 21 www.riceenergy.com

RMP 2Q 2016 Adjusted EBITDA and DCF Reconciliation Three Months Ended ($ in thousands) June 30, 2016 Reconciliation of Net Income to Adjusted EBITDA and DCF: Net income $27,936 Interest expense 920 Depreciation expense 6,855 Amortization of intangible assets 403 Non-cash equity compensation expense 1,134 Amortization of deferred financing costs 144 Other income 361 Adjusted EBITDA $37,753 Cash interest expense (920) Estimated maintenance capital expenditures (2,800) Distributable cash flow $34,033 Total distributions declared $18,254 DCF coverage ratio 1.86x Reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to Cash: Adjusted EBITDA $37,753 Interest expense (920) Other income (361) Changes in operating assets and liabilities 1,757 Net cash provided by operating activities 38,229 Net cash used in investing activities (38,776) Net cash provided by financing activities 6,059 Net increase in cash 5,512 Cash at the beginning of the period 9,811 Cash at the end of the period $15,323 Note: See slide 20 for important disclosures regarding non-gaap financial measures. 22 www.riceenergy.com

Cautionary Statements 23 www.riceenergy.com RICE ENERGY INC. FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS This presentation and the oral statements made in connection therewith may contain forward looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. All statements, other than statements of historical fact, regarding Rice Energy s strategy, future operations, financial position, estimated revenues and income/losses, projected costs, as amended, prospects, plans and objectives of management are forward-looking statements. These statements often include the words could, believe, anticipate, may, assume, forecast, position, predict, strategy, expect, intend, plan, estimate, project, budget, potential, or continue and similar expressions intended to identify forward-looking statements, although not all forwardlooking statements contain such identifying words. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, forward-looking statements contained in this presentation specifically include the closing and funding of the proposed acquisition; expectations regarding the benefits of the proposed acquisition, including with respect to drilling location, rates of return, production and reserves, estimated future production, sales, expenses, cash flows, liquidity and balance sheet attributes; estimates of Rice Energy s reserves, expectations of plans, strategies, objectives and anticipated financial and operating results of Rice Energy, including as to Rice Energy s drilling program, production, hedging activities, capital expenditure levels and other guidance included in this presentation. These forward-looking statements are based on Rice Energy s current expectations and assumptions about future events and are based on currently available information as to the outcome and timing of future events. Rice Energy assumes no obligation to and does not intend to update any forward looking statements included herein. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements. Rice Energy cautions you that these forward-looking statements are subject to all of the risks and uncertainties, most of which are difficult to predict and many of which are beyond their control, incident to the exploration for and development, production, gathering and sale of natural gas, natural gas liquids and oil. These risks include, but are not limited to, commodity price volatility; inflation; lack of availability of drilling and production equipment and services; environmental risks; drilling and other operating risks; regulatory changes; the uncertainty inherent in estimating natural gas reserves and in projecting future rates of production, cash flow and access to capital; the timing of development expenditures; risks relating to joint venture operations; the uncertain nature of acquisitions and ability to complete any such transaction; and the other risks described under Risk Factors in Rice Energy s most recent Form 10-K, Form 10-Q and other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Furthermore, Rice Energy may not be able to close the Vantage acquisition in a timely manner or at all, the ultimate funding sources for the transaction may differ from current expectations, Rice Energy may not be able to recognize the expected benefits from the transaction (including our expectations for production growth) and its capital program may exceed budgeted amounts. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties occur, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, Rice Energy s actual results and plans could differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statements. This presentation has been prepared by Rice Energy and includes market data and other statistical information from sources believed by Rice Energy to be reliable, including independent industry publications, government publications or other published independent sources. Some data are also based on Rice Energy s good faith estimates, which are derived from its review of internal sources as well as the independent sources described above. Although Rice Energy believes these sources are reliable, it has not independently verified the information and cannot guarantee its accuracy and completeness. RICE MIDSTREAM PARTNERS LP FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS This presentation and the oral statements made in connection therewith may contain forward looking statements within the meaning of the securities laws. All statements, other than statements of historical fact, regarding Rice Midstream s strategy, future operations, financial position, estimated revenues and income/losses, projected costs, prospects, plans and objectives of management are forward-looking statements. These statements often include the words could, may, assume, forecast, position, predict, strategy, expect, intend, plan, estimate, anticipate, believe, project, budget, potential, or continue, and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements, although not all forward-looking statements contain such identifying words. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, forward-looking statements contained in this presentation specifically include the closing and funding of the proposed acquisition; expectations regarding the benefits of the proposed acquisition, including with respect to drilling location, rates of return, production and reserves, estimated future production, sales, expenses, cash flows, liquidity and balance sheet attributes; expectations of plans, strategies, objectives, anticipated financial and operating results of Rice Midstream. These forward-looking statements are based on Rice Midstream's current expectations and assumptions about future events and are based on currently available information as to the outcome and timing of future events. Rice Midstream assumes no obligation to and does not intend to update any forward looking statements included herein. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements. Rice Midstream cautions you that these forward-looking statements are subject to all of the risks and uncertainties, most of which are difficult to predict and many of which are beyond their control, incident to Rice Midstream s gathering and compression and water services business. These risks include, but are not limited to, commodity price volatility; environmental risks; regulatory changes; the uncertainty inherent in projecting throughput volumes, cash flow and access to capital; the timing of development expenditures of RICE and Rice Midstream s other customers; the uncertain nature of acquisitions and ability to complete any such transaction; and the other risks described under Risk Factors in Rice Midstream s most recent Form 10-K, Form 10-Q and other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties occur, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, Rice Midstream s actual results and plans could differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statements. This presentation has been prepared by Rice Midstream and includes market data and other statistical information from sources believed by Rice Midstream to be reliable, including independent industry publications, government publications or other published independent sources. Some data are also based on Rice Midstream s good faith estimates, which are derived from its review of internal sources as well as the independent sources described above. Although Rice Midstream believes these sources are reliable, it has not independently verified the information and cannot guarantee its accuracy and completeness.

Cautionary Statements (Continued) 24 www.riceenergy.com NON-PROVEN OIL AND GAS RESERVES The SEC permits oil and gas companies, in their filings with the SEC, to disclose proved reserves, which are reserve estimates that geological and engineering data demonstrate with reasonable certainty to be recoverable in future years from known reservoirs under existing economic and operating conditions and certain probable and possible reserves that meet the SEC s definition for such terms. Rice Energy may use certain broader terms such as EUR (estimated ultimate recovery of resources), and Rice Energy may use other descriptions of volumes of potentially recoverable hydrocarbon resources throughout this presentation that the SEC does not permit to be included in SEC filings. These broader classifications do not constitute reserves as defined by the SEC, and Rice Energy does not attempt to distinguish these classifications from probable or possible reserves as defined by SEC guidelines. Rice Energy s estimates of EURs have been prepared by its independent reserve engineers. These estimates are by their nature more speculative than estimates of proved, probable and possible reserves and accordingly are subject to substantially greater risk of being actually realized, particularly in areas or zones where there has been limited or no drilling history. Rice Energy includes these estimates to demonstrate what it believes to be the potential for future drilling and production by the company. Actual locations drilled and quantities that may be ultimately recovered from Rice Energy s properties will differ substantially. In addition, Rice Energy has made no commitment to drill all of the drilling locations which have been attributed to these quantities. Ultimate recoveries will be dependent upon numerous factors including actual encountered geological conditions, the impact of future oil and gas pricing, exploration and development costs, and future drilling decisions and budgets based upon Rice Energy s future evaluation of risk, returns and the availability of capital and, in many areas, the outcome of negotiation of drilling arrangements with holders of adjacent or fractional interest leases. Estimates of resource potential and other figures may change significantly as development of Rice Energy s properties provide additional data and therefore actual quantities that may ultimately be recovered will likely differ from these estimates. Rice Energy s forecast and expectations for future periods are dependent upon many assumptions, including estimates of production decline rates from existing wells, the undertaking and outcome of future drilling activity and activity that may be affected by significant commodity price declines or drilling cost increases. Certain of Rice Energy's wells are named after superheroes and monster trucks, some of which may be trademarked. Despite their size and strength, Rice Energy's wells are in no manner affiliated with such superheroes or monster trucks. Initial production rates are subject to decline over time and should not be regarded as reflective of sustained production levels. In particular, production from horizontal drilling in shale oil and natural gas resource plays and tight natural gas plays that are stimulated with extensive pressure fracturing are typically characterized by significant early declines in production rates.

Additional Disclosures 25 www.riceenergy.com Determination of Identified Drilling Locations as of December 31, 2015: Net undeveloped locations are calculated by taking RICE s total net acreage and multiplying such amount by a risking factor which is then divided by RICE s expected well spacing. RICE then subtracts net producing wells to arrive at undeveloped net drilling locations. Undeveloped Net Marcellus Locations RICE assumes these locations have 7,000 foot laterals and 750 foot spacing between wells which yields approximately 121 acre spacing. In the Marcellus, RICE applies a 20% risking factor to its net acreage to account for inefficient unitization and the risk associated with its inability to force pool in Pennsylvania. As of December 31, 2015, RICE had approximately 92,000 net acres in the Marcellus which results in 487 undeveloped net locations. Undeveloped Net Ohio Utica Locations RICE assumes these locations have 9,000 foot laterals and 1,000 foot spacing between wells which yields approximately 207 acre spacing. In the Ohio Utica, RICE applies a 10% risking factor to its net acreage to account for inefficient unitization. As of December 31, 2015, RICE had approximately 56,000 net acres prospective for the Utica in Ohio which results in 215 undeveloped net locations. This excludes ~2,500 net acres in Guernsey and Harrison Counties in Ohio. Undeveloped Net Pennsylvania Utica Locations RICE assumes these locations have 8,000 foot laterals and 2,000 foot spacing between wells which yields approximately 367 acre spacing. In the Pennsylvania Utica, RICE applies a 20% risking factor to its net acreage to account for inefficient unitization. As of December 31, 2015, RICE had approximately 49,000 net acres prospective for the Utica in Pennsylvania which results in 105 undeveloped net locations.