The Keystone Research Center 412 N. Third Street, Harrisburg PA Unemployment Claims Rising in Pennsylvania

Similar documents
WORKFORCE INFORMATION NEWS RELEASE

WORKFORCE INFORMATION NEWS RELEASE

5.7% 5,895,200 13,778

HOME ENERGY CONSUMPTION EXPENDITURES BY INCOME (PENNSYLVANIA) May Prepared For: Pennsylvania Utility Law Project (PULP Harrisburg, Pennsylvania

4.8% 6,005,900 60,000

4.1% 6,035,600 39,690

4.8% 6,004,600 61,300

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HUD 05/2016 STATE: PENNSYLVANIA HOUSING TRUST FUND PROGRAM RENTS

4.7% 5,994,700 99,110

4.8% 5,987, ,100

4.6% 5,976,00 77,720

4.5% 6,014,400 53,080

National and Regional Economic Update

National and Regional Economic Update

71 st Annual Field Meeting

Banking Trends & Supervisory Update

4.6% 5,852,000 23,941

The Effects of the Proposed Pennsylvania Minimum Wage Increase

Economic Conditions and Outlook

The Commonwealth s Official Source for Population and Economic Statistics. December 3, 2015

Equal pay for breadwinners

The Economic Outlook

Rental housing affordability in Pennsylvania. Eileen Divringi Community Development Research Analyst Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia

Employment Law Project. The Crisis of Long Term Unemployment and the Need for Bold Action to Sustain the Unemployed and Support the Recovery 1

Research & Policy Brief Number 4 December 2009

71 st Annual Field Meeting

cepr Analysis of the Upcoming Release of 2003 Data on Income, Poverty, and Health Insurance Data Brief Paper Heather Boushey 1 August 2004

Housingmarket. Tennessee. 2nd Quarter Business and Economic Research Center David Penn, Ph.D., Associate Professor, Economics

Nickel & Dimed In Pennsylvania The Falling Purchasing Power of the Tipped Minimum Wage By Mark Price 1 September 17, 2013

Unemployment Insurance Primer: Understanding What s At Stake as Congress Reopens Stimulus Package Debate. Wayne Vroman January 2002

Chapter 9: Unemployment and Inflation

Employment in Central Oregon: January, 2015

Poverty in Our Time. The Challenges and Opportunities of Fighting Poverty in Virginia. Executive Summary. By Michael Cassidy and Sara Okos

Measuring Total Employment: Are a Few Million Workers Important?

Health Insurance Data

US & PA Construction Spending, Labor and Materials Outlook

Investment Company Institute PERSPECTIVE

71 st Annual Field Meeting

State of Ohio Workforce. 2 nd Quarter

IBO. Despite Recession,Welfare Reform and Labor Market Changes Limit Public Assistance Growth. An Analysis of the Hudson Yards Financing Plan

Report on Economic and Financial Developments

IN THE MIDST OF THE GREAT RECESSION

THE EMPLOYMENT SITUATION: MAY 2002

THE ECONOMY IN 2017: BETTER, BUT WORSE!

Business insights. Employment and unemployment. Sharp rise in employment since early 1975

Maine s Labor Market Recovery: Far From Complete by Joel Johnson and Garrett Martin

QUARTERLY INDICATORS Southern Nevada Business Confidence Index

Economic Forecast for 2009

Recent Changes in the Housing and Mortgage Markets of Pennsylvania; Working Paper #1-2011


The Economic Case for Unemployment Insurance and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program

THE EMPLOYMENT SITUATION: SEPTEMBER 2000

820 First Street, NE, Suite 510, Washington, DC Tel: Fax:

Special Report. May 28, the United States and. represent over 50% of total employment in 60. the country. In addition to their majority

UI Overview and Forecasts

Report on Economic and Financial Developments

Two New Indexes Offer a Broad View of Economic Activity in the New York New Jersey Region

The Service Contractor Provision of the Proposed Living Wage Ordinance in Allegheny County. An Impact Assessment

EPI Issue Brief. Economic Policy Institute May 15, 2003 THE BROAD REACH OF LONG-TERM UNEMPLOYMENT

INDUSTRY MIX, WAGES, AND THE DIVERGENCE OF COUNTY INCOME IN PENNSYLVANIA

PREMIUM DRIVERS REPORT

Nevada Labor Market Briefing: January Summary of Labor Market Economic Indicators

Pro-growth Agenda PART ONE: PROBLEMS & STEPHEN MOORE

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS. HAWAII'S UNEMPLOYMENT RATE AT 2.2 PERCENT IN SEPTEMBER Jobs Increase 11,600 Over the Year

SENATE PROPOSAL TO ADD UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE BENEFITS IMPROVES EFFECTIVENESS OF STIMULUS BILL by Chad Stone, Sharon Parrott, and Martha Coven

CAN EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT EXPLAIN THE RISE IN LABOR FORCE PARTICIPATION AT OLDER AGES?

Patterns of Unemployment

No Relief to Those Who Need It Most

Central Oregon Employment Situation for December 2014

The State of Working Pennsylvania 2 014

TENNESSEE HOUSING MARKET

Data Digest: Georgia. June 2012

EMPIRE CENTER RESEARCH & DATA. P.O. Box 7113, Albany, New York PH: www. empirecenter.

Federal Reserve Bulletin: May Seasonally NONINOUSTRIAL INDUSTRIAL i I I I! » 1960

The East Bay Weekly Wages

The Recession: How Bad Will It Be?

Research & Statistics Office Department of Labor and Industrial Relations State of Hawai i. Unemployment and the Recession Beyond the Headlines

Market Bulletin. The wage puzzle. August 21, In brief. U.S. wages A failure to launch

Effects of the Oregon Minimum Wage Increase

Pennsylvania Public Pension Basics

Which Estimates of Metropolitan-Area Jobs Growth Should We Trust?

BTC Reports. Cuts to unemployment insurance in North Carolina have made it harder for jobless UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE:

The Path to Responsible Financing of California s Unemployment Insurance System By Maurice Emsellem, Mike Evangelist, Claire McKenna

FISCAL POLICY* Chapt er. Key Concepts

Annual Evaluation of the Hawaii Unemployment Compensation Fund

Economic Activity Report. October 2016

CEPR CENTER FOR ECONOMIC AND POLICY RESEARCH

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS HAWAII'S UNEMPLOYMENT RATE AT NEW RECORD 2.0 PERCENT IN NOVEMBER

POLICY PAGE. 900 Lydia Street Austin, Texas PH: / FAX:

Race and Housing in Pennsylvania

Weekly Economic Commentary

Issue Brief Unemployment Compensation in Florida Executive Summary

North Carolina s June Employment Figures Released

New York s unemployment insurance system: A vital safety net for New York workers and their families during economic downturns

Employment from the BLS household and payroll surveys: summary of recent trends

EXPLAINING CHANGES IN FOOD STAMP PROGRAM PARTICIPATION RATES

California Jobs and Unemployment

North Carolina s April Employment Figures Released

North Carolina s January Employment Figures Released

GENERAL FUND REVENUE & ECONOMIC OUTLOOK. January 20, 2009 Fiscal Research Division Barry Boardman, Ph.D.

Transcription:

Briefing Paper The Keystone Research Center 412 N. Third Street, Harrisburg PA 17101 www.keystoneresearch.org Unemployment Claims Rising in Pennsylvania David H. Bradley and Stephen A. Herzenberg November 2, 2001 Summary Prior to September 11, as documented in Keystone Research Center s The State of Working Pennsylvania 2001 (on line at http://www.keystoneresearch.org), signs already existed of looming recession in Pennsylvania. 1 Using data from the U.S. Department of Labor and the Pennsylvania Department of Labor and Industry, this briefing paper considers whether Pennsylvania s economy has softened further in the last two months. We focus especially on two periods, the five weeks ending October 20 and the first nine months of 2001. Where possible, we compare figures for Pennsylvania in these two periods with the same time span a year ago and with U.S. trends. Since state-level unemployment statistics that reflect the impact of September 11 will not be available until November 20 (for reasons explained in the Box below), we rely heavily on weekly data on the number of Pennsylvanians filing claims for unemployment benefits. Especially at the state level, unemployment claims data provide the earliest indications of the economic impact of September 11. Our analysis reveals that Pennsylvania has experienced a sharp spike in unemployment insurance (UI) claims since September 11. In 2001 as a whole, Pennsylvania s manufacturing sector has been especially hard hit. In the five weeks ending October 20, in Pennsylvania, initial claims for unemployment insurance (UI) and total weeks of unemployment insurance have been 53-54 percent higher than in the same five-week period 12 months earlier. In the United States in the same period, initial claims for UI

climbed 63 percent compared to the previous year. In Pennsylvania, from January of this year until the week ending October 20: initial claims for unemployment insurance jumped to nearly a million 978,029 an increase of 32 percent from 738,786 the year before. the total number of weeks of UI claimed in Pennsylvania rose to 7.3 million compared to 5.5 million a year ago, an increase of 31 percent. In Pennsylvania, in the first nine months of 2001, the total number of Pennsylvania workers filing initial claims for unemployment insurance due to large-scale mass layoffs increased to 103,066, from just 67,288 in the first nine months of 2000; the share of workers filing initial claims for unemployment insurance due to mass layoffs exceeded the U.S. share filing by 51 percent; 67,802 manufacturing workers filed claims for unemployment insurance due to mass layoffs, 87 percent more than in the first nine months of 2000; one out of every 13 manufacturing workers has filed for unemployment insurance due to a mass layoff; and the share of manufacturing workers filing initial claims for unemployment insurance due to mass layoffs (involving 50 or more workers) exceeded the U.S. share filing by 43 percent. To counter the slowing economy and rising unemployment, state and national Pennsylvania legislators should be at the forefront of efforts to craft an economic stimulus package that directly addresses the needs of unemployed workers and their families. A stimulus targeted at the unemployed and at lowincome workers who spend most of any benefits they receive would also be the best way to help Pennsylvania communities and businesses weather an economic downturn. Unemployment by Month from January-September Table 1 shows the seasonally adjusted unemployment rate in Pennsylvania by month from January to September 2000 and 2001. In every month in 2001, the unemployment rate has been at least 0.3 percentage points Table 1. Pennsylvania Unemployment, January-September 2000 and 2001 Percent Unemployment (%) Month 2000 2001 Increase in Unemployment Rate in 2001 Compared to 12 Months Earlier (percentage points) January 4.1 4.4 0.3 February 4.2 4.6 0.4 March 4.0 4.5 0.5 April 4.1 4.4 0.3 May 4.1 4.7 0.6 June 4.2 4.8 0.6 July 4.2 4.6 0.4 August 4.2 4.9 0.7 September 4.2 4.6 0.4 Source: PA Department of Labor and Industry, PA Labor Market Information Database System, on line at http://www.lmi.state.pa.us. Data are seasonally adjusted. higher than in 2000. In the past five months, the unemployment rate has averaged between 0.5 and 0.6 percentage points higher than a year earlier. 2

Claims for Unemployment Insurance In the Five Weeks Ending October 20 Because September 2001 unemployment figures do not include the impact of September 11, unemployment insurance claims (available weekly and with only a short delay) are the first statistics that provide an indication of whether the labor market is loosening or tightening. For the first 43 weeks of 2000 and 2001, the Pennsylvania Department of Labor and Industry weekly data provided data on initial claims for UI benefits and total weeks of benefits claimed. 2 Figures 1 and 2 present this data graphically. Both figures show that UI claims have been consistently higher in 2001 than in 2000. They also show that the gap between UI claims in 2001 and in 2000 has been increasing over the course of the year, particularly recently. Over the year 2001 as a whole through October 20, initial claims for unemployment insurance jumped to nearly a million 978,029 an increase of 32 percent from 738,786 the year before. WHERE PENNSYLVANIA UNEMPLOYMENT STATISTICS COME FROM AND WHY THEY DON T YET SHOW THE IMPACT OF SEPTEMBER 11 Although the September unemployment number for Pennsylvania (see Table 1) has now been available for about two weeks, that figure does not reflect the impact of September 11. Moreover, the October unemployment figures for Pennsylvania and other states will not be published until November 20. For these reasons, we rely in this paper on unemployment insurance claims to get our first measures of Pennsylvania labor market performance after September 11. Why don t the September unemployment numbers show the impact of September 11? The reasons relate to the main source of unemployment data the Current Population Survey (CPS) of households that the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics conducts each month. At the national level, unemployment figures come directly from responses to the CPS. At the state level, including for Pennsylvania, a statistical model is used to adjust CPS data. But the CPS remains the primary underlying data source. This CPS household survey is ordinarily conducted in the week that includes the 12 th of the month. In September, the household survey was conducted on September 10-14. Anyone working any part of that week (including on September 10), and even those temporarily absent from their jobs, were considered employed. When it first released the September U.S. unemployment figure (on line at http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.nr0.htm by 8:30 a.m. on October 5, the first Friday of the month), BLS stated it is likely that the events of September 11 had little effect on the September employment and unemployment counts. the total number of weeks of UI claimed in Pennsylvania rose to 7.3 million compared to 5.5 million a year ago, an increase of 31 percent. In the five weeks ending October 20, Initial claims for unemployment insurance in Pennsylvania have been 54 percent higher in than in the same period 12 months earlier. This compares with a 63 percent increase in the United States. Total weeks of unemployment insurance claimed in Pennsylvania have been 53 percent higher than a year earlier (no exactly parallel figure is available for the U.S.). Table 2. Initial Claims for Unemployment Insurance Due to Mass Layoffs, Pennsylvania and the United States (January-September each year) Year Pennsylvania United States 1996 97,028 970,881 1997 86,720 1,131,166 1998 91,794 1,258,235 1999 75,437 1,151,572 2000 73,102 1,188,580 2001 112,184 1,723,176 Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Mass Layoffs, on line at http://www.bls.gov. 3

Figure 1 In Five Weeks Ending Oct. 20, Initial Claims for Unemployment Insurance Up 50 Percent From 2000 Number of Persons Filing Initial Claims for Unemployment Insurance 50,000 45,000 40,000 35,000 30,000 25,000 20,000 15,000 10,000 5,000 2001 2000-1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 Week of the Year Note: the week ending 1/6/01 has been matched with the week ending 1/8/00 and so o Source: Pennsylvania Department of Labor and Indus t Figure 2: In Five Weeks Ending Oct. 20, Total UI Claims in PA 50 Percent Higher than a Year Ago 250,000 200,000 2000 2001 2001 minus 2000 Weeks of UI Claimed 150,000 100,000 50,000 0-50,000 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 Week of the Year Note: the week ending 1/6/01 has been matched with the week ending 1/8/00 and so o Source: Pennsylvania Department of Labor and Indus t 4

UI Claims Due to Mass Layoffs Another indicator of the current economic situation is the number of workers filing unemployment insurance claims due to large-scale or mass layoffs. Mass layoffs are defined by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics to be layoffs leading to 50 or more UI claims within a five-week period. Table 2. Initial Claims for Unemployment Insurance Due to Mass Layoffs, Pennsylvania and the United States (January-September each year) Year Pennsylvania United States 1996 97,028 970,881 1997 86,720 1,131,166 1998 91,794 1,258,235 1999 75,437 1,151,572 Table 2 shows the total number of claims for unemployment insurance due to mass layoffs in Pennsylvania and the United States in the first nine months of the years 1996 to 2001 (the only years for which this data is available). Based on the totals for January-September, unemployment due to mass layoffs is higher in 2001 than for any previous year in both Pennsylvania and the United States. Pennsylvania unemployment claims due to layoffs in the January-September 2001 period were more than 15,000 higher than in the previous 5 years and about 39,000 higher than in the year 2000. Figure 3 shows mass layoffs in the first nine months of each year as a share of total employment. Share of All Workers Due to Mass Filing Layoff Initial (percent) Claims for UI Benefits 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 2000 73,102 1,188,580 2001 112,184 1,723,176 Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Mass Layoffs, on line at http://www.bls.gov. Figure 3. Workers Filing Unemployment Insurance Claims Due to Mass Layoffs Reach Highest Point in 2001 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 In Pennsylvania in the first nine months of 2001, one out of every 51 workers filed an initial claim for unemployment insurance due to a mass layoff. 0.0 Pennsylvania Source: KRC based on U.S. Department of Labor data. United States In the first nine months of 2001, the share of Pennsylvania workers filing initial claims for UI due to mass layoffs exceeded the share of workers filing in 2000 by 52 percent. Pennsylvania s mass layoff rate in the first nine months of 2001 was 51 percent above the U.S. rate. UI Claims Due to Mass Layoffs in Manufacturing Table 3 presents data on mass layoffs within manufacturing. As the table indicates, manufacturing Table 3. Initial Claims for Unemployment Insurance Due to Mass Layoffs in Manufacturing, Pennsylvania and the United States (January-September each year) Number of Claims Claims Due to Manufacturing Mass Layoffs as Share of Total Claims due to Mass Layoffs (percent) Year Pennsylvania United States Pennsylvania United States 1996 50,604 473,302 52% 49% 1997 43,031 442,379 50% 39% 1998 43,998 541,250 48% 43% 1999 34,785 462,928 46% 40% 2000 36,207 464,669 50% 39% 2001 67,802 838,882 60% 49% Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Mass Layoffs, on line at http://www.bls.gov. 5

accounts for a larger share of mass layoffs in Pennsylvania than nationally and a larger share in the last year than previously. Figure 4. One in 13 Pennsylvania Manufacturing Workers Has Filed for UI Benefits Due to a Mass Layoff in the First Nine Months of 2001 Figure 4 shows mass layoffs in manufacturing in the first nine months of each year as a share of total manufacturing employment. In Pennsylvania in the first nine months of 2001, one out of every 13 manufacturing workers has filed a claim for unemployment insurance due to a mass layoff. Share of Manufacturing Workers Filing Initial Claims for UI Benefits Due to Mass Layoffs (percent) In the first nine months of 2001, the share of Pennsylvania workers filing initial claims for unemployment insurance due to mass layoffs exceeded the share of workers filing in 2000 by 92 percent. 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Pennsylvania Source: KRC based on U.S. Department of Labor data. 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 United States Table 4. Pennsylvania Unemployment by Metropolitan Statistical Area, August 2000 and 2001 The mass layoff rate in manufacturing inpennsylvania in the first nine months of 2001 was 44 percent higher than in the United States as a whole. Unemployment by Metropolitan Area Within Pennsylvania Breaking the unemployment rate down by Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA), Table 4 shows that unemployment rose in all but two of Pennsylvania s 14 MSAs between August 2000 and August 2001. From August 2000 to August 2001, the unemployment rate rose by at least one percentage point in seven of the 14 MSAs. Metropolitan Statistical Area Allentown- Bethlehem- Easton Unemployment Rate (percent) August 2001 August 2000 4.8 3.7 1.1 Altoona 5.4 4.4 1.0 Erie 5.5 4.5 1.0 Harrisburg- Lebanon-Carlisle 3.7 2.8 0.9 Johnstown 5.9 6.3-0.4 Lancaster 3.3 2.5 0.8 Philadelphia 4.6 4.1 0.5 Pittsburgh 4.3 4.1 0.2 Reading 5.0 3.9 1.1 Scranton- Wilkes-Barre- Hazleton 5.5 4.5 1.0 Sharon 4.7 4.7 Ñ Change in unemployment rate (percentage points) State College 2.8 2.4 0.4 Conclusion Williamsport 5.9 3.9 2.0 York 5.0 3.3 1.7 Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Local Area Unemployment Statistics, online at http://www.bls.gov. Data are not seasonally adjusted. The immediate threat to the Pennsylvania economy is the onset of a potentially deep recession, with particularly severe consequences for manufacturing. Public policy at the national and state level should directly counter the threat 6

of recession, for example by extending unemployment benefits for the long-term unemployed and making benefits available to more unemployed workers. Other critical needs include providing health insurance for workers losing their jobs and expanding opportunities for workers to obtain training, if necessary, for a new family supporting career. These types of measures could help kick start a new period of economic growth. They are also in line with a long-term strategy for restoring broadly shared prosperity (for one such strategy, see Pennsylvania s Next Agenda, on line at the web site of United Pennsylvanians, www.unitedpa.org). At a time of vanishing government surpluses and increasing human needs, public policy should not squander precious resources on tax cuts for the affluent or for profitable corporations. Such actions would do little to stimulate consumer spending or investment. The would also reinforce the two-decade old tendency for Pennsylvania and the United States to grow apart. Now more than ever, Pennsylvania needs to commit itself to growing together. Endnotes 1 This is a revised and updated version of a Briefing Paper with the same title released earlier. 2 The most recent available six weeks of state-level UI claims data can also be obtained on line from the U.S. Department of Labor at http://www.ows.doleta.gov/news/news.asp. Changes in UI claims do not precisely predict changes in the unemployment rate. This is partly because individuals who receive unemployment benefits make up only part of the total unemployed population (in Pennsylvania, 54 percent of the unemployed received UI in the first quarter of 2001). Since workers with more stable jobs are more likely to be eligible for UI, and disproportionately likely to be layed off early in a recession, the share of unemployed workers eligible for unemployment insurance tends to increase slightly early in a recession. If claims for unemployment track eligibility (i.e., people who are eligible to receive benefits are more likely to claim them), then it is likely that UI initial claims rise faster early in a recession than does actual unemployment. 7