The Economic Impact of Rhode Island s Community Health Centers

Similar documents
The Economic Impact of Nevada s Community Health Centers

The Economic Impact of Health Care Collaborative of Rural Missouri

Access to Care and the Economic Impact of Community Health Centers

Estimating the Effects of Health Reform on Health Centers Capacity to Expand to New Medically Underserved Communities and Populations

SUPREME COURT RULING ON ACA S MEDICAID EXPANSION: HOW WILL NON-IMPLEMENTATION AFFECT CHC CAPACITY?

Using Primary Care to Bend the Curve: Estimating the Impact of a Health Center Expansion on Health Care Costs

The Economic Impact of the Local Healthcare System on the Woodford County Economy

Financial and Operational Benchmarking Trends & Techniques

The Economic Impact of the Local Healthcare System on the Owsley County Economy

FQHCs as a New Asset Class for CDFIs:

Medicaid Expansion in Indiana February 2013

Economic Impact of Long Term Care Facilities

Table 1 Economic Impact of the Local Healthcare System on Green County. Multiplier Type Direct Impact Multiplier Total Impact

Table 1 Economic Impact of the Local Healthcare System on Morgan County. Multiplier Type Direct Impact Multiplier Total Impact

Table 1 Economic Impact of the Local Healthcare System on Lawrence County. Multiplier Type Direct Impact Multiplier Total Impact

Table 1 Economic Impact of the Local Healthcare System on Daviess County. Multiplier Type Direct Impact Multiplier Total Impact

Table 1 Economic Impact of the Local Healthcare System on Jefferson County. Multiplier Type Direct Impact Multiplier Total Impact

Table 1 Economic Impact of the Local Healthcare System on Lyon County. Multiplier Type Direct Impact Multiplier Total Impact

Table 1 Economic Impact of the Local Healthcare System on Boone County. Multiplier Type Direct Impact Multiplier Total Impact

Table 1 Economic Impact of the Local Healthcare System on Hancock County. Multiplier Type Direct Impact Multiplier Total Impact

Table 1 Economic Impact of the Local Healthcare System on Woodford County. Multiplier Type Direct Impact Multiplier Total Impact

Table 1 Economic Impact of the Local Healthcare System on Caldwell County. Multiplier Type Direct Impact Multiplier Total Impact

Table 1 Economic Impact of the Local Healthcare System on Hardin County. Multiplier Type Direct Impact Multiplier Total Impact

Table 1 Economic Impact of the Local Healthcare System on Estill County. Multiplier Type Direct Impact Multiplier Total Impact

FEDERALLY QUALIFIED HEALTH CENTER MEDICAID PAYMENT RATES COMPUTATION. $25,000 Radiology Service Added

The Affordable Care Act: Opportunities to Influence Implementation

Assessing the Potential Impact of the Affordable Care Act on Uninsured Community Health Center Patients: An Update

The Economic Impact of the Health Sector on the Fairfax Community Hospital Medical Service Area

BALANCING INVESTMENT IN FEDERALLY QUALIFIED HEALTH CENTERS AND MEDICAID FOR IMPROVED ACCESS AND COVERAGE

The Medicaid Undercount in the Current Population Survey

THE ECONOMIC AND FISCAL IMPACT OF MEDICAID EXPANSION IN PENNSYLVANIA: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Just What the Doctor Ordered How Medicaid Stimulus Funding is Helping Iowa s Economic Recovery

Economic Impact of Tennessee HOUSE Grants

The Value of the Local Healthcare System on the Jefferson County Economy

Economic Impacts of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act in Florida

Economic Impact of the Commercial Construction Industry on the Economy of the State of Alabama

The Value of the Local Healthcare System on the Harrison County Economy

The Value of the Local Healthcare System on the Lyon County Economy

Community Health Center Financial Perspectives Issue 1

The Economic Impact. of the Proposed Oklahoma SoonerCare Expansion, CYs

THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF THE PHYSICIAN SECTOR St. Joseph County, Indiana

Fiscal Impact Analysis of the North Carolina Rural Job Creation Fund

Fiscal Policy Project

State Economic and Employment Losses If Community Health Center Funding Is Not Restored

ECONOMIC IMPACT OF LOCAL PARKS FULL REPORT

Strengthening Primary Care to Bend the Cost Curve: The Expansion of Community Health Centers Through Health Reform

Economic Stress and the Safety Net: A Health Center Update. by Sara Rosenbaum, Peter Shin, and Julie Darnell

The Economic Impact of Idaho Nonprofits

The Economic Contribution of Maine s Hospitals

Economic Impact of the Health Sector on the Economy Jefferson County, Oklahoma

Funding Sources for FQHC Capital Projects: Updates on New Markets Tax Credits and HRSA's Loan Guarantee Program

The Economic. Impact of Veteran-Owned. Franchise. August 30, 2011

Economic Impact of the New Ulm Medical Center and Related Health Sectors of Brown County

Economic Impact. Naval Air Station. Patuxent River. Naval Surface Warfare Center. Indian Head. Analysis of the. of the. and the.

ECONOMIC IMPACTS OF MEDICAID EXPANSION

ations than Chapman Jona Scenario Planning: e oactiv Modeling Financial Implic

HEALTH CARE REFORM Focus on Group Coverage Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Minnesota. All rights reserved.

kaiser medicaid and the uninsured commission on

Learning Collaborative: Funding. Evaluating Financing Options and Fundraising Plans. Jonathan Chapman Director, CHC Advisory Services.

THE FACTS ON MEDICAID COPAYMENTS Considerations for Arkansas

Health Economics Program

The Economic Effects of Repealing Medicaid Expansion in Alaska

The Economic Impact of Leech Lake Band of Ojibwe Gaming Operations

ECONOMIC IMPACTS OF BUSINESSES AND PROJECTS ON UNIVERSITY DRIVE IN PINE BLUFF, ARKANSAS

May 22, Dear Chairman Pai and FCC Commissioners:

Economic Impact of a Wind Generation Project in Somerset County Maryland

Medicaid FQHC APMs What are they and what do they mean for health centers? Alex Harris, MSPH Deputy Director, Transformation Policy

Health Insurance Coverage in 2014: Significant Progress, but Gaps Remain

Introduction Background: The PCO Role in Needs Assessment Types of Needs Assessment Methods of Capacity Assessment Future Role: PPACA and Primary

Status of CHIP Prospective Payer System Implementation: An Assessment of State CHIP Directors

UPDATED BRIEF WITH 2016 DATA

The Importance of the Health Care Sector to the Kansas Economy

MEMORANDUM. Gloria Macdonald, Jennifer Benedict Nevada Division of Health Care Financing and Policy (DHCFP)

Fact Sheet March, 2012

Economic and Employment Effects of Expanding KanCare in Kansas

Economic Contribution of the Hennepin County Medical Center System

Estimated Financial Effects of Expanding Oregon s Medicaid Program under the Affordable Care Act ( )

The Economic Impact of SoonerCare on Oklahoma s Economy

The Economic Impact of the Florida Department of Health, Comprehensive Statewide Tobacco Education and Use Prevention Program, on the State of

MASSHEALTH: THE BASICS

Using Financial & Operational Data To Plan For Growth

Recent Trends in the Use of and Capacity for Primary Health Care Services Among Travis County Safety Net Providers The Indigent Care Collaboration

Innovative Approaches to Using Data to Demonstrate Value: Measuring & Reporting Clinical, Operational, Financial Improvement

The Importance of the Health Care Sector to the Economy of Washington County

11/14/2013. Overview. Employer Mandate Exchanges Medicaid Expansion Funding. Medicare Taxes & Fees. Discussion

ACA in Brief 2/18/2014. It Takes Three Branches... Overview of the Affordable Care Act. Health Insurance Coverage, USA, % 16% 55% 15% 10%

ASSESSING THE RESULTS

REVIEW OF KANCARE: COST AND UTILIZATION

People s Community Clinic

Health Care Reform and Arkansas

Implications of the Affordable Care Act for the Criminal Justice System

Financial and Operational Benchmarking

Under the Patient Protection and Affordable

Economic Impacts of Port of Vancouver Non-Maritime Real Estate Tenants

THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF AMERICA S ELECTRIC COOPERATIVES

The Economic Impacts of Oregon Health & Science University

Data Limitations in the UDS Mapper.

Issue Brief. Sources of Health Insurance and Characteristics of the Uninsured: Analysis of the March 2007 Current Population Survey. No.

Rural Policy Brief. Brief No August 2017

Colorado s Uninsured Children

Transcription:

The Economic Impact of Rhode Island s Community Health Centers

In 2013, 8 Rhode Island health centers from 29 sites provided 600,736 PATIENT ENCOUNTERS to 146,038 PATIENTS UNINSURED 32% MEDICAID 40% Under 200% poverty 91% Under 100% poverty 71% COMMUNITY IMPACT MEDICARE 7% saving the system $ 184 MILLION ANNUAL COST SAVINGS Rhode Island community health centers directly generated ECONOMIC IMPACT 1,040 and supported an additional 1,779 TOTAL JOBS $124,642,915 Direct $ 226,144,655 TOTAL ECONOMIC IMPACT 740 $101,501,740 Non-direct and contributed approximately TAX IMPACT $9.7 MILLION State & Local Tax Revenue $19.3 MILLION Federal Tax Revenue $29.0 MILLION TOTAL TAX IMPACT

COMMUNITY IMPACT Community health centers provide high quality, cost-effective, patient-centered care to vulnerable populations. CHCs serve 1 in 7 Medicaid beneficiaries, almost 1 in 3 individuals in poverty, and 1 in 5 low-income, uninsured persons. Nationally, two-thirds of health center patients are members of racial or ethnic minorities, which places CHCs at the center of the national effort to reduce racial disparities in health care. 1 Recent studies show that, on average, each patient receiving care at a CHC saved the health care system 24%, annually. 4 With 146,038 patients served in Rhode Island health centers in 2013, this amounts to an estimated annual savings of $184 million at $1,263 saved per patient. 5 ECONOMIC IMPACT As Rhode Island CHCs continue to expand, their expenditures and corresponding economic impact grow. Rhode Island health centers have an impact of about $226 million dollars in this year. The table to the right summarizes the 2013 economic impact of Rhode Island CHCs. TAX IMPACT The tax impacts of Rhode Island CHCs are divided into state/local governments and Federal government agencies. The tax impact values show the amount of revenue generated for governments from employee compensation, proprietor income, indirect business taxes, households, and corporations based on the modeled impact. State/Local: shows state and local government tax types and their value of collection as a result of CHC expenditures. Federal: shows a breakdown of Federal tax types and their value of collection as a result of CHC expenditures. Distribution of Population CHC Population National Population 2, 3 Under 100% Poverty 71% 20% Under 200% Poverty 91% 40% Uninsured 32% 15.4% Medicaid 40% 16% Medicare 7% 16% Summary of 2013 Total Economic Activity Stimulated by 8 of Rhode Island s Community Health Centers' Current Operations Economic Impact (incl. Value-Added) Value-Added (incl. personal income) Employment (# of FTEs) Direct $ 124,642,915 $ 71,896,144 1,040 Indirect $ 34,872,727 $ 21,243,960 241 Induced $ 66,629,013 $ 41,553,981 499 Total $ 226,144,655 $ 134,694,085 1,779 Direct # of FTEs (employment) based on HRSA 2013 UDS state level data for FQHCs. Summary of Rhode Island CHCs' 2013 Tax Impact Federal State/Local Direct $ 11,767,169 $ 2,751,433 Indirect $ 2,558,601 $ 2,041,823 Induced $ 5,010,926 $ 4,857,432 Total $ 19,336,696 $ 9,650,688 Total Tax Impact $ 28,987,384

RHODE ISLAND COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INCLUDED IN THIS ANALYSIS: Blackstone Valley Community Health Care, Inc. Comprehensive Community Action, Inc. East Bay Community Action Program Providence Community Health Centers Thundermist Health Center Tri-Town Community Action Program WellOne Primary Medical and Dental Care Wood River Health Services, Inc. ABOUT RHODE ISLAND HEALTH CENTER ASSOCIATION Since, 1972, the Rhode Island Health Center Association has been the voice of community based primary care health programs. Focusing on Rhode Island s Community Health Centers, the Association plays a vital role in educating federal state and local policymakers about issues relating to health care and the role of the community health centers in the health care continuum. ABOUT CAPITAL LINK Capital Link is a non-profit organization that has worked with hundreds of health centers and Primary Care Associations over the past 15 years to plan capital projects, finance growth and identify ways to improve performance. We provide innovative advisory services and extensive technical assistance with the goal of supporting and expanding community-based health care. Established in the late 1990s as a joint effort of the National Association of Community Health Centers (NACHC), several statebased Primary Care Associations (PCAs), and the Bureau of Primary Health Care, Capital Link grew out of the community health center family and continues to support it through our activities. For more information visit www.caplink.org.

ECONOMIC IMPACT DEFINITION OF TERMS This analysis applies the multiplier effect, using an integrated economic modeling and planning tool called IMPLAN (IMpact analysis for PLANning) to capture the direct, indirect, and induced economic effects of an organization s business operations. IMPLAN was developed by the U.S. Department of Agriculture and the Minnesota IMPLAN Group (MIG) and employs multipliers, specific to each county and each industrial sector, to determine total output, employment, and earnings. This analysis was conducted using Implan Version 3, Trade Flows Model. Output Multiplier: measures the increase in total output generated in a defined regional economy for each dollar spent by a given industry. Value-added (Earnings) Multiplier: measures the earnings (purchasing power) that an industry generates, through payroll and the multiplier effect, for households employed by all industries within a defined area. Employment Multiplier: measures the number of jobs generated across all industries by the activity within a given industry. The multiplier produces an estimate of the total number of jobs that a local economy can support in all industries due to the dollars being injected by the organization. IMPLAN s output, earnings, and employment figures are aggregated based on: Direct effects: represents the response for a given industry (in this case Total Operating Expenditures of health centers). Indirect effects: represents the response by all local industries caused by the iteration of industries purchasing. Induced effects: represents the response by all local industries to the expenditures of household income generated by direct and indirect effects. Full-Time Equivalent: FTE of 1.0 means that the person is equivalent to a full-time worker. In an organization that has a 40 hour work week, a person who works 20 hours per week (i.e. 50 percent time) is reported as 0.5 FTE. FTE is also based on the number of months the employee works. An employee who works full time for 4 months out of the year would be reported as 0.33 FTE (4 months/12 months). REFERENCES 1. NACHC, A Sketch of Community Health Centers, 2013. Includes patients of federally-funded health centers, non federally-funded health centers, and expected patient growth for 2013. 2. Based on Bureau of Primary Health Care, HRSA, DHHS, 2012 Uniform Data System. U.S.: Kaiser Family Foundation, State Health Facts Online, www.statehealthfacts.org. Based on Census Bureau's March 2012 and 2013 Current Population Survey (CPS: Annual Social and Economic Supplements). 3. Based on Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services: www.cms.gov. Medicare Enrollment All Beneficiaries: as of JULY 2012 4. Richard et al. Cost Savings Associated with the Use of Community Health Centers. Journal of Ambulatory Care Management, Vol. 35, No. 1, pp. 50 59, January/March 2012. 5. Ku et al. Strengthening Primary Care to Bend the Cost Curve: The Expansion of Community Health Centers Through Health Reform. Geiger Gibson/RCHN. Community Health Foundation Research Collaborative. Policy Research Brief No. 19. June 30, 2010. This analysis was completed using unaudited 2013 UDS data as submitted by the health centers. 2014, Capital Link, Inc. All Rights Reserved. www.caplink.org