Performance Metrics and Incentive Compensation

Similar documents
HOSPITALITY INDUSTRY ANNUAL AND LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PRACTICES

2016 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION REPORT: HOMEBUILDERS ANNUAL AND LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PRACTICES

2018 Corporate Governance & Incentive Design Survey Fall 2018

CAP 100 Company Research

Incentive Compensation Plan Performance Metrics

Executive Compensation

ISS RELEASES PRELIMINARY FAQS FOR 2018 PROXY SEASON

Remuneration. Bill McEwan Chairman of the Remuneration Committee of the Supervisory Board

Compensation of Executive Board Members in European Health Care Companies. HCM Health Care

U.S. Compensation Policies

INCENTIVE PLAN SERIES

U.S. Compensation Policies

Driving Performance - Linking Equity Compensation Design with FAS 123(R) Valuation, Jeff Bacher and Terry Adamson, Aon Consulting

Total Shareholder Return How does it really add value?

LUXFER HOLDINGS PLC. Remuneration Policy Report

Australia. Pay-for-Performance Model. Frequently Asked Questions. Effective for Meetings on or after October 1, Published August 2017

Salesforce. Supplemental Proxy Materials. May NYSE: CRM San Francisco, CA

flash NEWSLETTER Executive Compensation: Transition from Private to Public

General Counsel Pay Trends 2016

PROGRESS SOFTWARE CORPORATION (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Non-GAAP Financial Measures Free Cash Flow ( FCF )

Equity Compensation All Stars Game: Silicon Valley vs. The Rest of the World

Executive Compensation Checklist for Pre-IPO Companies

HYDRO ONE S PROPOSED NEW COMPENSATION FRAMEWORK

Crane Co. Financial Overview. Richard Maue, Chief Financial Officer

U.S. Compensation Policies

Bonus deferral. Annual bonus

4.3 Remuneration report

Directors Compensation Policy Approved by 91.71% of shareholders on 7 June 2017

Directors remuneration in FTSE SmallCap companies. March 2017

Agenda. Market Context Building Blocks of Compensation. Primer on Equity Incentives Case Study Total Rewards Conference & Exhibition

Your individual survey responses will not be shared with anyone outside of ISS and will be used only by ISS for policy formulation purposes.

Executive Compensation Index United States

The value of equity-based compensation

Stockholder Engagement: Executive Compensation. May 2017

As approved by the General Meeting of Shareholders on 3 May, 2013

Twitter. 1Q 2014 Earnings Report

INTERSECTIONS INC. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

Agenda and Explanatory Notes to the Agenda of the Annual General Meeting of Shareholders of. Koninklijke Ahold N.V.

Pillar 3 Disclosure (UK) As at 31 December 2010

Executive compensation practices and performance. April 2018

PLAN DESIGN STRATEGIES FOR SUCCESS

QuinStreet Reports Q1 Financial Results and Corporate Restructuring

NOTICE OF 2015 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT

Remuneration Report 2016

Incentive Plan Design Practices

CLIENT ALERT. ISS Publishes Evaluating Pay for Performance Alignment White Paper

ROADMAP FROM CONCEPT TO IPO.

2015 French Equity- Based Compensation

Executive Compensation

Salesforce Proxy Statement Supplement

Annual General Meeting

Moscow Exchange Methodological Recommendations for Drafting and Implementing Dividend Policies by Public Companies

Penn National Gaming, Inc. Margin Improvement Initiatives

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS

Respondent name: Sample Health Care Company name: Info-Tech Respondant Executive Summary

The Real Deal? Are Performance Awards Really Paying for Performance? October 24, 2013

3i Group plc. Directors remuneration policy

APX Group Holdings, Inc.

Long-Term Incentives Gone Wild?:

flash Newsletter Issue #45 April 24, 2013

A guide to the incremental borrowing rate Assessing the impact of IFRS 16 Leases. Audit & Assurance

Discussion Draft: Overview of Issues, Proposed Definitions, and a Conceptual Framework

A JOINT PROJECT WITH:

FREDERIC W. COOK & CO., INC.

Comp Talks Proxy Season Rundown Scrutinizing 2017 to Improve 2018

HOW DOES YOUR LTI PROGRAM MEASURE UP?

Perspectives Paper NACD. Pay for Performance and Supplemental Pay Definitions

Fourth Quarter 2017 Earnings Presentation. February 14, 2018

Performance Equity Plans: The Design and Valuation Under FAS 123(R)

Record Revenues Drive 46% Net Income Growth During Strongest Third Quarter in Walker & Dunlop s History

Executive Compensation Trends

Trends Among U.S. Community Foundations

12567 West Cedar Drive Lakewood, CO (303) ; (866)

THIRD QUARTER 2018 RESULTS November 6, 2018

Fourth Quarter and Full-Year 2018 Earnings Call February 20, 2019

February 3, Intel Stockholders,

Principles of Executive Compensation

Transparency. Inclusiveness. Global Expertise.

6700 Forum Drive, Suite 150 Orlando, FL (407)

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION IN ESOP TRANSACTIONS AND ESOP COMPANIES

MeasureIT Benchmarking Report IT Budgeting Metrics

GENESIS ENERGY, L.P. RECONCILIATION OF NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO GENESIS ENERGY, L.P. TO AVAILABLE CASH BEFORE RESERVES - UNAUDITED

Item 16 Share-based incentive programmes

REIT Executive Compensation Trends

FY12 Performance Share Plan. February 9, :30-9:30 a.m. (EST)

Benchmark. Base salary 2012 Base salary 2013 Base salary 2014

INC Research/inVentiv Health Reports Third Quarter 2017 Results

Executive Compensation Alert

GENESIS ENERGY, L.P. RECONCILIATION OF SEGMENT MARGIN AND ADJUSTED EBITDA TO NET INCOME - UNAUDITED

COVER SHEET SHEET. (Company's Full Name) 3 2 N D S T R E E T C O R N E R 7 T H A V E N U E B O N I F A C I O G L O B A L C I T Y T A G U I G

Comp Talks. Practical Implementation Tips for Dodd Frank Act Pay Ratio Disclosure, Pay Versus Performance Disclosure and Clawback Policies

ISS RELEASES FINAL FAQS FOR THE 2018 PROXY SEASON

About Meridian Compensation Partners, LLC

Equity Compensation in Troubled Times

513 North Belcher Road Clearwater, FL (866)

Please see pages 8 and 9 of this publication for important certification and disclosure information.

Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. (1) First Quarter 2007 Performance Results Including Non-GAAP Measures, Definitions and Use/Importance

OIL AND GAS OILFIELD SERVICES (OFS) INCENTIVE COMPENSATION REPORT. Analysis of Compensation Arrangements Among the Largest U.S.

Over the last several years, we have witnessed

Transcription:

1

Performance Metrics and Incentive Compensation Appropriate alignment of executive compensation with company performance is a central component of overall compensation philosophy at many companies. By tying actual executive pay to achievement of specific goals, companies motivate senior employees to drive financial and strategic success. Studying the performance metrics used by peers can offer interested companies a way to better contextualize their own pay-for-performance practices and provide them with valuable information about the effectiveness of their incentive compensation plans. Main Data Group now offers a unique and powerful plan-based award metrics and pay-forperformance (P4P) tool that allows companies to compare performance using the metrics used in plan-based awards in addition to Total Shareholder Return (TSR). Our Research Our analysts collect information about how performance is measured for each plan-based award, including financial metrics, discretionary considerations and weightings where available. This high-resolution approach to SEC research provides us the information necessary to offer highly useful, specific benchmarking data. The findings presented below are based on SEC filing research for the top one thousand publicly traded U.S. companies by revenue for the most recent fiscal year. The study includes a total of 1101 current and former Chief Executive Officers. 2

Short-Term Cash Awards A total of 893 executives (81.1%) in the study group were granted short-term cash awards. The most commonly disclosed financial performance metrics for short-term cash awards include: - used for 280 executives (31.4%) Revenue - used for 249 executives (27.9%), and Operating income - used for 208 executives (23.3%). Board discretion and individual performance were also common design parameters in shortterm cash awards. The following graph presents the most prevalent design parameters for short-term cash awards in the study. Short-Term Cash Design Parameters Individual Performance Strategic Objectives EBITDA Revenue (Sales) Total Revenue Net Income Free Cash Flow 3

Long-Term Cash Awards A long-term cash award was disclosed for 129 executives in the study. The most commonly disclosed financial performance metrics utilized for this award type include: - used for 31 executives (24.0%) Relative TSR - used for 27 executives (20.9%), and Return on capital - used for 26 executives (20.2%). Board discretion was disclosed as a factor in payout of long-term cash awards by 21 of the 129 companies in the study group who offer that award type. It was a design parameter in the payout of long-term cash awards in less than half the percentage of companies as it was in the payout of short-term cash awards. The following graph presents the ten most prevalent design parameters for long-term cash awards in the study. Long-Term Cash Design Parameters Relative TSR Return on Capital Revenue (Sales) Total Revenue Strategic Objectives EBITDA Individual Performance 4

Performance Stock Awards Performance stock awards (including units) were disclosed for 616 executives included in the study. The most commonly disclosed financial performance metrics utilized for this award type include: Relative TSR - used for 200 executives (32.5%) - used for 157 executives (25.5%), and Return on capital - used for 68 executives (11.0%). Board discretion was a component of performance evaluation for 35 executives (5.7%) with this award type. The following graph presents the ten most prevalent design parameters for performance stock awards granted to executives in the study group. Performance Stock Design Parameters Relative TSR Return on Capital Total Revenue EBITDA Revenue (Sales) Net Income Return on Equity 5

Performance Option Awards Performance option awards were granted to 22 executives in the study group. The most commonly disclosed financial performance metrics utilized for this award type include: - used for 4 executives (18.2%) Stock appreciation used for 3 executives (13.6%) Revenue used for 3 executives (13.6%), and Operating income -used for 3 executives (13.6%). Board discretion was a component of performance evaluation for 2 executives (9.1%) with this award type. The following graph presents the top 5 most prevalent design parameters for performance-based option awards in the study group. Performance Option Design Parameters Stock Price Appreciation Revenue (Sales) 6

Performance-Accelerated Awards Performance-accelerated awards are stock or option awards granted with a time-vesting provision as well as performance measures. If achieved, performance metrics for these awards result in vesting of the award shares earlier than scheduled under the service-based condition of the grant. Out of 1101 executives in the study group, 46 executives (4.2%) were granted performance-accelerated stock. 12 executives (1.1%) were granted performance-accelerated options. The following graph presents the most prevalent design parameters used for performanceaccelerated stock awards among the study group companies. Performance-Accelerated Stock Design Parameters Stock Price Appreciation Operating Cash Flow Relative TSR Net Income Return on Capital EBITDA 7

The following graph presents the most prevalent design parameters used for performanceaccelerated option awards among the study group companies. Performance-Accelerated Option Metrics Stock Price Appreciation Operating Cash Flow Strategic Objectives TSR Stock Price Appreciation (Relative) Return on Equity Free Cash Flow 8

About Main Data Group Main Data Group is a provider of high-resolution executive compensation data. We have a robust, cloud-based platform which streamlines peer comparison work for compensation professionals. Our breadth-of-data and ease-of-use goes above and beyond any other products currently available. The information and analyses in this email were developed using the Main Data Group Snapshot Data executive compensation benchmarking tool. Our analyses are based on information disclosed in SEC filings. To learn more about Snapshot Data or to request a free two-week trial, e-mail us at information@maindatagroup.com or call us at (408) 776-1000 x106 Main Data Group, Inc. 2013. (408) 776 1000. www.maindatagroup.com 9