International Trade: Lecture 3

Similar documents
Topics in Trade: Slides

Topics in Trade: Slides

Monopolistic competition: the Dixit-Stiglitz-Spence model

International Trade: Lecture 4

Increasing Returns and Economic Geography

International Trade Lecture 14: Firm Heterogeneity Theory (I) Melitz (2003)

International Trade Lecture 5: Increasing Returns to Scale and Monopolistic Competition

Topics in Trade: Slides

Monopolistic competition models

Class Notes on Chaney (2008)

INTERNATIONAL MONETARY ECONOMICS NOTE 8b

Economic Geography, Monopolistic Competition and Trade

Ramsey s Growth Model (Solution Ex. 2.1 (f) and (g))

Trade Theory with Numbers: Quantifying the Welfare Consequences of Globalization

Lecture 3: New Trade Theory

Intermediate Macroeconomics

Volume 30, Issue 4. A decomposition of the home-market effect

International Economics Lecture 2: The Ricardian Model

Firms in International Trade. Lecture 2: The Melitz Model

New Trade Theory I. Part A: Simple monopolistic competition model. Robert Stehrer. The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies - wiiw

Trade Liberalization and Labor Unions

Microeconomic Theory May 2013 Applied Economics. Ph.D. PRELIMINARY EXAMINATION MICROECONOMIC THEORY. Applied Economics Graduate Program.

ECO 445/545: International Trade. Jack Rossbach Spring 2016

TOPICS IN MACROECONOMICS: MODELLING INFORMATION, LEARNING AND EXPECTATIONS LECTURE NOTES. Lucas Island Model

Technology, Geography and Trade J. Eaton and S. Kortum. Topics in international Trade

International Economics B 9. Monopolistic competition and international trade: Firm Heterogeneity

Impact of Tariff under Hecksher-Ohlin Comparative Advantage Setting and Firm Heterogeneity

Midterm Exam International Trade Economics 6903, Fall 2008 Donald Davis

Real Business Cycles (Solution)

Problem set Fall 2012.

Topics in Trade: Slides

Heterogeneous Firms. Notes for Graduate Trade Course. J. Peter Neary. University of Oxford. January 30, 2013

Lecture 13. Trade in Factors. 2. The Jones-Coelho-Easton two-factor, one-good model.

Capital Goods Trade and Economic Development

GAINS FROM TRADE IN NEW TRADE MODELS

Internationalization of Production: FDI and. FDI-Outsourcing

Stanford Economics 266: International Trade Lecture 8: Factor Proportions Theory (I)

Lecture 12 Ricardian Equivalence Dynamic General Equilibrium. Noah Williams

The Effects of Regional Free Trade Agreements on Industrial Structure: An Extension of Krugman s Economic Geography Model (1991)

Lecture 12: New Economic Geography

Eco504 Spring 2010 C. Sims MID-TERM EXAM. (1) (45 minutes) Consider a model in which a representative agent has the objective. B t 1.

Microeconomic Theory August 2013 Applied Economics. Ph.D. PRELIMINARY EXAMINATION MICROECONOMIC THEORY. Applied Economics Graduate Program

Financial Crises, Dollarization and Lending of Last Resort in Open Economies

CEMMAP Masterclass: Empirical Models of Comparative Advantage and the Gains from Trade 1 Lecture 1: Ricardian Models (I)

Expansion of Network Integrations: Two Scenarios, Trade Patterns, and Welfare

Graduate Macro Theory II: Two Period Consumption-Saving Models

Final Exam (Solutions) ECON 4310, Fall 2014

Lecture 3: International trade under imperfect competition

Problem Set 3: Suggested Solutions

University Paris I Panthéon-Sorbonne International Trade L3 Application Exercises

Ph.D. Preliminary Examination MICROECONOMIC THEORY Applied Economics Graduate Program June 2017

Study Questions (with Answers) Lecture 4 Modern Theories and Additional Effects of Trade

Transport Costs and North-South Trade

Answers to Microeconomics Prelim of August 24, In practice, firms often price their products by marking up a fixed percentage over (average)

Trade and Labor Market: Felbermayr, Prat, Schmerer (2011)

Homework # 8 - [Due on Wednesday November 1st, 2017]

Traded and non-traded goods

Optimal Redistribution in an Open Economy

Heterogeneous Firm, Financial Market Integration and International Risk Sharing

Labor Market Rigidities, Trade and Unemployment

Microeconomic Foundations of Incomplete Price Adjustment

Economics 689 Texas A&M University

Elements of Economic Analysis II Lecture XI: Oligopoly: Cournot and Bertrand Competition

STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT ALBANY Department of Economics. Ph. D. Comprehensive Examination: Macroeconomics Fall, 2010

On Quality Bias and Inflation Targets: Supplementary Material

Does Encourage Inward FDI Always Be a Dominant Strategy for Domestic Government? A Theoretical Analysis of Vertically Differentiated Industry

Partial privatization as a source of trade gains

The Stolper-Samuelson Theorem when the Labor Market Structure Matters

Advanced Macro and Money (WS09/10) Problem Set 4

Macroeconomics. Lecture 5: Consumption. Hernán D. Seoane. Spring, 2016 MEDEG, UC3M UC3M

The objectives of the producer

Discussion Papers In Economics And Business

Notes II: Consumption-Saving Decisions, Ricardian Equivalence, and Fiscal Policy. Julio Garín Intermediate Macroeconomics Fall 2018

1 Dynamic programming

Economics 2450A: Public Economics Section 1-2: Uncompensated and Compensated Elasticities; Static and Dynamic Labor Supply

Université Paris I Panthéon-Sorbonne Cours de Commerce International L3 Exercise booklet

Gains from Trade. Rahul Giri

Elements of Economic Analysis II Lecture II: Production Function and Profit Maximization

Final Exam II (Solutions) ECON 4310, Fall 2014

Intertemporal choice: Consumption and Savings

Product Di erentiation. We have seen earlier how pure external IRS can lead to intra-industry trade.

Macroeconomics and finance

Homework Assignment #2: Answer Sheet

Financial Liberalization and Neighbor Coordination

MACROECONOMICS. Prelim Exam

Lecture 15 Dynamic General Equilibrium. Noah Williams

UNIVERSITY OF OSLO DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS

The views expressed in this paper are those of the author(s) only, and the presence of them, or of links to them, on the IMF website does not imply

Social Common Capital and Sustainable Development. H. Uzawa. Social Common Capital Research, Tokyo, Japan. (IPD Climate Change Manchester Meeting)

Final Exam Solutions

Examiners commentaries 2011

Aggregation with a double non-convex labor supply decision: indivisible private- and public-sector hours

Mock Examination 2010

Distortions and Government Policies as Determinants of Trade, unotes6. Motivation:

COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGE TRADE

A REINTERPRETATION OF THE KEYNESIAN CONSUMPTION FUNCTION AND MULTIPLIER EFFECT

Microeconomics of Banking: Lecture 2

1 Asset Pricing: Replicating portfolios

NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES ON QUALITY BIAS AND INFLATION TARGETS. Stephanie Schmitt-Grohe Martin Uribe

Money in an RBC framework

Transcription:

International Trade: Lecture 3 Alexander Tarasov Higher School of Economics Fall 2016 Alexander Tarasov (Higher School of Economics) International Trade (Lecture 3) Fall 2016 1 / 36

The Krugman model (Krugman 1980) Krugman 1980: "Scale Economies, Product Differentiation, and the Pattern of Trade" The H-O model explains trade patterns between countries with different factor endowments The Ricardian model: trade patterns between countries with different technologies However! None of these models explains trade between the industrial (developed) countries with similar technologies and factor endowments. Moreover, trade between developed countries is basically two-way exchange of differentiated products (intra-industry trade). A new framework is needed! = New Trade Theory Alexander Tarasov (Higher School of Economics) International Trade (Lecture 3) Fall 2016 2 / 36

The Krugman model The main elements: Economies of scale (increasing return to scale) The possibility of product differentiation: firms can costlessly differentiate their products (each product is a new one) = monopoly power Imperfect competition (monopolistic competition): each firm is small enough to affect aggregate variables Free entry = Trade between economies with similar factor endowments, the role of a home market in determining trade patterns. Alexander Tarasov (Higher School of Economics) International Trade (Lecture 3) Fall 2016 3 / 36

The Krugman model: Assumptions A large number of potential goods (in fact, a continuum of potential goods) The utility function is given by U = n ci θ i=1 where 0 < θ < 1 and c i is consumption of good (variety) i. The number of goods actually produced is n. Alexander Tarasov (Higher School of Economics) International Trade (Lecture 3) Fall 2016 4 / 36

The Krugman model: Assumptions The only factor of production is labor. The cost function (labor requirements): l i = α + βx i where x i output of good i. That is, there are a fixed costs of production and constant marginal costs. Increasing returns to scale: l i x i = α x i + β is decreasing in x i. Therefore, it is profitable for firms to produce a new variety than to compete with other firms (higher share of the market). Alexander Tarasov (Higher School of Economics) International Trade (Lecture 3) Fall 2016 5 / 36

The Krugman model: Assumptions We identify consumers with workers: x i = Lc i where L is the number of workers in the economy. Full employment (labor market clearing condition): Firms maximize their profits. L = n i=1 (α + βx i ). Free entry: equilibrium profits are always zero. Alexander Tarasov (Higher School of Economics) International Trade (Lecture 3) Fall 2016 6 / 36

The Krugman model: Equilibrium in Closed Economy Consumer Behavior: Consumers maximize subject to where w is the wage level. U = n ci θ i=1 n p i c i = w i=1 Alexander Tarasov (Higher School of Economics) International Trade (Lecture 3) Fall 2016 7 / 36

The Krugman model: Equilibrium in Closed Economy Consumer Behavior: This implies that individual demand for good i is given by c i = ( ) 1 λ θ θ 1 p 1 θ 1 i where λ is the Lagrangian multiplier (the marginal utility of income) and given by θ λ = θ i p θ 1 i w 1 θ. Alexander Tarasov (Higher School of Economics) International Trade (Lecture 3) Fall 2016 8 / 36

The Krugman model: Indirect Utility Let us calculate the indirect utility function when the prices are identical. Specifically, U = ci θ i ) θ U = n 1 θ ( w p Hence, there is a variety effect (represented by n ) the traditional income effect, w p. Alexander Tarasov (Higher School of Economics) International Trade (Lecture 3) Fall 2016 9 / 36

The Krugman model: Equilibrium in Closed Economy Firms: Firms profits are given by π i = (p i w β) x i wα, Recall that x i = Lc i = L ( ) 1 λ θ 1 1 p θ 1 θ i. Therefore, firms maximize (each firm ignores the effect of its actions on other firms, λ is taken as given) with respect to price. π i = (p i w β) L ( ) 1 λ θ θ 1 p 1 θ 1 i wα Alexander Tarasov (Higher School of Economics) International Trade (Lecture 3) Fall 2016 10 / 36

The Krugman model: Equilibrium in Closed Economy Firms: The optimal price level is given by p i = p = βw θ Prices are the same for all goods (symmetry). The price does not depend on output (the property of the utility function) Given the price: π i = 1 θ w βx i wα θ Alexander Tarasov (Higher School of Economics) International Trade (Lecture 3) Fall 2016 11 / 36

The Krugman model: Equilibrium in Closed Economy Free entry condition: Because of free entry, firms profits are equal to zero in the equilibrium. Therefore, π i = 0 x i = αθ β(1 θ). Production of each firm is constant and does not depend on the characteristics of the economy: the size, the number of firms, etc. Alexander Tarasov (Higher School of Economics) International Trade (Lecture 3) Fall 2016 12 / 36

The Krugman model: Equilibrium in Closed Economy The number of firms: Labor market clearing condition implies that Therefore, L = nl i = n(α + βx i ) = n α 1 θ n = The model is closed! We know n, p, x. (1 θ)l. α Alexander Tarasov (Higher School of Economics) International Trade (Lecture 3) Fall 2016 13 / 36

The Krugman model: Effects of Free Trade Suppose now there are two countries. Countries have same technologies and preferences One factor of production = no differences in relative factor endowments No conventional reasons for trade: the Ricardian and H-O models predict no trade! Trade occurs because, in the presence of increasing returns, each good will be produced in only one country and only by one firm! Alexander Tarasov (Higher School of Economics) International Trade (Lecture 3) Fall 2016 14 / 36

The Krugman model: Effects of Free Trade The trade equilibrium: The symmetry and the absence of transport costs imply that the countries have the same wages (FPE). Demand for a certain variety does not change = p = βw θ. Therefore, the output of each firm does not change compare to the autarky equilibrium. The only thing that changes is the number of varieties: U = i ci θ ( ) + c θ j. j Individuals distribute their expenditure over both the n goods produced at home and the n goods produced in the foreign country. Alexander Tarasov (Higher School of Economics) International Trade (Lecture 3) Fall 2016 15 / 36

The Krugman model: Effects of Free Trade The trade equilibrium: n and n can be found from the labor markets clearing conditions: n = n = (1 θ)l α (1 θ)l α Gains from trade: w p does not change. The variety effect only works. Consumers gains because of higher number of available varieties: U = (n + n ) 1 θ ( w p ) θ. Gains from trade come solely through increased product diversity. Alexander Tarasov (Higher School of Economics) International Trade (Lecture 3) Fall 2016 16 / 36

The Krugman model: Effects of Free Trade Trade volumes: Consider the value of exports from the home country to the foreign: Exports = npc L where c is the demand for a certain variety of an individual in the foreign country. It can be shown (see the class presentation) that c = w (n + n )p Therefore, EX = w nl n + n. Alexander Tarasov (Higher School of Economics) International Trade (Lecture 3) Fall 2016 17 / 36

The Krugman model: Effects of Free Trade Trade balanced condition: The trade balanced condition states that imports should be equal to exports. In our case, it holds. It confirms our assumption about same wage rate in the countries. In general, we want to have w nl n + n = wn L n + n w = w. Alexander Tarasov (Higher School of Economics) International Trade (Lecture 3) Fall 2016 18 / 36

The Krugman model: Transport Costs Now suppose there are trade costs represented by the "iceberg" transport cost, τ An individual has a choice over n domestic products and n products produced abroad. Because of trade costs, foreign products will cost more than the producer price. That is, if p is the producer price of a foreign variety, than the price of this product in the home country is τp. In other words, domestic consumers pay τp, while foreign consumers pay only p. Alexander Tarasov (Higher School of Economics) International Trade (Lecture 3) Fall 2016 19 / 36

The Krugman model: Transport Costs Equilibrium: "Bad news!" Because of trade costs, wage rates are different in the countries. But! Demand for a certain variety still has the same elasticity p = w β/θ p = w β/θ. In the same manner, Finally, x = x = n = n = αθ β(1 θ) (1 θ)l α (1 θ)l α Alexander Tarasov (Higher School of Economics) International Trade (Lecture 3) Fall 2016 20 / 36

The Krugman model: Transport Costs Equilibrium: Hence, we need to find only wages or, in fact, the relative wage given by ω = w w. We will use the trade balanced condition: the total value of exports should be equal to the total value of imports. Exports of the home country are given by EX = npτc L, where c is the foreign demand for domestic variety. It can be shown that c = w pτ n ( p pτ 1 ) θ θ 1 + n Alexander Tarasov (Higher School of Economics) International Trade (Lecture 3) Fall 2016 21 / 36

The Krugman model: Transport Costs Equilibrium: Therefore, total exports are given by EX = w nl ( ) θ n p θ 1 pτ + n By analogy, total imports (total exports of the foreign country) are given by IM = wn L ( ) θ n p θ 1 p τ + n Alexander Tarasov (Higher School of Economics) International Trade (Lecture 3) Fall 2016 22 / 36

The Krugman model: Transport Costs Equilibrium: In equilibrium: EX = IM ( w w = L + w ) θ w θ 1 Lτ 1 θ θ L + ( ). θ w w 1 θ L τ 1 θ θ From this equation, we can find w w (see the picture in the class note). Alexander Tarasov (Higher School of Economics) International Trade (Lecture 3) Fall 2016 23 / 36

The Krugman model: Transport Costs Analysis of the equilibrium: First, if τ = 1, then w w = 1 Second, assume that L > L, then w w < 1, That is, the larger country has the higher wage. Intuition: if production costs were the same in both countries (this is the case when wages are the same), it would be always profitable to produce near the larger market (to save on transport cost). Therefore, to keep labor employed in both countries, this advantage must be offset by a wage differential. Alexander Tarasov (Higher School of Economics) International Trade (Lecture 3) Fall 2016 24 / 36

The Krugman model: The Home Market Effect Main idea: countries will tend to export those kinds of products for which they have relatively large domestic demand. Two industries with many differentiated products within each of them. We want to show: Countries will be a net exporter in the industry for whose products it has the relatively larger demand. Alexander Tarasov (Higher School of Economics) International Trade (Lecture 3) Fall 2016 25 / 36

The Krugman model: The Home Market Effect Setup: Two classes of products: alpha and beta Consumption in one class is c i and in the other class is c i Two population groups: one group of size L likes only alpha products, while the other group of size L likes only beta products. That is, U = ci θ and Ũ = c i θ i i The technology of production is the same for both industries l i = α + βx i lj = α + β x j Alexander Tarasov (Higher School of Economics) International Trade (Lecture 3) Fall 2016 26 / 36

The Krugman model: The Home Market Effect There are two countries and transport cost of the "iceberg form". We assume that L + L = L + L = L, meaning that w = w. However, L = f L L = (1 f ) L where f (0, 1). That is, in terms of demand, the foreign country is a mirror image of the home country. If f > 0.5, then the home country has the large domestic market for the alpha products and vice versa. Alexander Tarasov (Higher School of Economics) International Trade (Lecture 3) Fall 2016 27 / 36

The Krugman model: The Home Market Effect Theorem The home country will be a net exporter of the first industry s products (alpha products) if f > 0.5. Alexander Tarasov (Higher School of Economics) International Trade (Lecture 3) Fall 2016 28 / 36

The Krugman model: Testing The Home Market Effect Davis and Weinstein (2003) "Market access, economic geography and comparative advantage: an empirical test," Journal of International Economics The traditional H-O model: Consider a positive shock to the home demand structure for a good. If the production set is strictly convex, the demand shock causes the relative price of the good to rise. This in turn increases the production of good in both countries. Therefore, the idiosyncratic demand will be partly met additional local supply and partly by higher imports. Local supply moves less than one-for-one with the idiosyncratic demand. Alexander Tarasov (Higher School of Economics) International Trade (Lecture 3) Fall 2016 29 / 36

The Krugman model: Testing The Home Market Effect Davis and Weinstein (2003) The Krugman model: A rise in the home demand for alpha products (a rise in L): more home firms enter the industry. These firms sell in both home and foreign markets (exports). As a result, production in the alpha industry increases by more than unity! Alexander Tarasov (Higher School of Economics) International Trade (Lecture 3) Fall 2016 30 / 36

The Krugman model: Testing The Home Market Effect Davis and Weinstein (2003) Hence, there is a key difference between two types of models: the elasticity of production subject to idiosyncratic demand. An equivalent formulation (Davis and Weinstein (2003)): idiosyncratic demand patterns have a magnified impact on production patterns. The elasticity is greater then one in the Krugman model, but less than one in the classical theory. In the data (OECD countries in 1985): elasticity appeared to be greater than one! Alexander Tarasov (Higher School of Economics) International Trade (Lecture 3) Fall 2016 31 / 36

The Krugman model: Testing The Home Market Effect Costinot et al. (2016) "THE MORE WE DIE, THE MORE WE SELL? A SIMPLE TEST OF THE HOME-MARKET EFFECT," NBER Working paper 22538. They used variation in disease burdens across countries as a way to address the empirical challenge of testing the home market effect. countries whose populations are more likely to die from particular diseases, because of exogenous demographic characteristics, are also more likely to demand pharmaceutical treatments that target those diseases one can test for the existence of the home-market effect by estimating whether higher disease burdens at home tend to increase the sales of domestic drugs (treating those diseases) abroad (the weak home-market effect) and if so, whether they tend to increase them by more than the sales of foreign drugs at home (the strong ("theoretical") home-market effect) Alexander Tarasov (Higher School of Economics) International Trade (Lecture 3) Fall 2016 32 / 36

The Krugman model: Testing The Home Market Effect Costinot et al. (2016) The drug famotidine used to treat peptic ulcers and gastro-esophageal reflex was discovered in Japan (Hara, 2003), a country known for particularly high incidence rates of peptic ulcers. In the data, individuals in Japan are nearly twice as likely to die from digestive disorders than are individuals in the rest of the world 0.243 deaths per 1,000 population annually in Japan, relative to 0.130 on average in other countries. Alexander Tarasov (Higher School of Economics) International Trade (Lecture 3) Fall 2016 33 / 36

The Krugman model: Testing The Home Market Effect Costinot et al. (2016) The data: sales of Japanese drugs targeting peptic ulcers and gastro-esophageal reflux diseases outside Japan account for 10.35% of world sales, compared to an average of 4.54% for all other disease categories. This paper uses this type of variation extended to exploit demographic-driven components in order to test for the home-market effect in a dataset with near-global coverage of drug sales and disease burdens. Alexander Tarasov (Higher School of Economics) International Trade (Lecture 3) Fall 2016 34 / 36

The Krugman model: Testing The Home Market Effect Costinot et al. (2016) The paper documents sales in 56 countries of more than 20,000 molecules by roughly 2,650 firms, which we convert to a dataset of bilateral sales at the disease level, by matching each firm to the country in which it is headquartered and each molecule to the disease that it targets. It also documents the demographic composition and disease burdens in the same 56 countries. Alexander Tarasov (Higher School of Economics) International Trade (Lecture 3) Fall 2016 35 / 36

The Krugman model: Testing The Home Market Effect Costinot et al. (2016) The authors document: countries tend to sell relatively more of the drugs for which they have higher disease burdens in line with the existence of a weak home-market effect the elasticity of sales towards foreign countries tends to be higher than the elasticity of purchases from foreign countries which is consistent with the existence of a strong home-market effect Alexander Tarasov (Higher School of Economics) International Trade (Lecture 3) Fall 2016 36 / 36