EY Tax Alert. Executive summary. Delhi Tribunal rules on advertisement and promotion expenses involving use of trademarks as not royalty.

Similar documents
Supreme Court rules accumulated losses of amalgamating company to be set off after reducing interest waiver benefit

EY Tax Alert. Executive summary

MoF issues Notifications and Circular for services relating to transportation of goods by vessel

EY PAS Alert. Finance bill proposes tax on long-term gains arising on sale of listed equity shares Impact on employee stock option plans

EY Tax Alert. J&K HC rules that contract receipts of a JV result in diversion of income to JV members; receipt not an income of the JV

EY Tax Alert Bangalore Tribunal rules on constitution of service PE for services rendered virtually as well as physically

EY Tax Alert. Executive summary. Chennai Tribunal upholds salary taxation of SARs benefits received from foreign parent of employer.

EY Tax Alert. Delhi Tribunal rules guarantee fee income received by foreign parent from Indian subsidiary is taxable in India.

EY Tax Alert Delhi High Court upholds weighted R&D deduction for recognized inhouse R&D facility from the date prior to recognition and approval

Delhi Tribunal rules income of non-resident that is not attributable to PE in India shall still be taxable in India as FTS

HC denies refund of SAD paid on import of coil sheets sold after corrugation as proflex roof

EY Alert. Kerala High Court quashes 2014 notification amending the Employees Pension Scheme, 1995

EY Tax Alert. Central Government modifies conditions for availing exemption from angel tax provision. Executive summary

EY Tax Alert. Mumbai Tribunal rules conversion of compulsory convertible preference shares into equity shares is not transfer.

AAR rules that provision of business support services to US affiliate are naturally bundled and are not intermediary services

EY PAS Alert. Executive summary. Press release dated 27 February

EY Tax Alert. Supreme Court reaffirms constitutional validity of Aadhaar PAN linking requirement. Executive summary

Amendments at enactment stage of Finance Bill, 2017

This Tax Alert provides highlights of the Taxation Laws (Amendment) Bill, 2017 ( Bill ) introduced in the Lok Sabha on 31 March 2017.

EY Tax Alert. Supreme Court upholds lease equalization adjustment in finance lease as per the ICAI Guidance Note for tax purposes.

Indian Equalization Levy on digital services to be effective from 1 June 2016, administrative rules notified

Pune Tribunal upholds tax deductibility of MTM exchange fluctuation loss on forex loan borrowed to reduce interest cost and hedge export receivables

EY Tax Alert. Executive summary. Supreme Court rules on characterization of property rental income as income from house property.

EY Tax Alert. Executive summary

EY Tax Alert. Executive summary. Delhi HC rules payment towards live telecast is not royalty. 1 December 2014

Bombay HC upholds non-taxability of deferred consideration on transfer of shares in the absence of accrual

EY Tax Alert. Full Bench of Karnataka HC rules incidental interest income earned by Taxpayer is eligible for export incentive scheme deduction

EY Tax Alert. Supreme Court negates claim for 100% deduction for fresh five years of new units undertaking substantial expansion.

EY Tax Alert. CBEC releases four Rules approved by GST Council and issues Notifications under Central and Integrated GST.

Clarifications on Indirect transfer provisions under the Incometax Act, 1961

and Master File implementation

CBDT introduces form for employee investment declarations and extends due date for quarterly withholding statements

EY Tax Alert. Executive summary

EY Tax Alert Central Board of Direct Taxes issues final rules prescribing methodology for determining fair market value of unquoted shares

EY Tax Alert. Conversion of company into LLP under LLP Act results in transfer subject to capital gains tax. Executive summary

EY Tax Alert. Executive summary

Mumbai Tribunal rules reimbursement of expenses on secondment of employees not FTS

EY Tax Alert. Executive summary. Supreme Court rules on year of deductibility of debenture interest paid upfront. 26 March 2015

EY Tax Alert. Executive summary

EY Tax Alert. Executive summary

CBDT releases fifth round of FAQs on Income Declaration Scheme, 2016

EY Tax Alert. Executive summary

EY Tax Alert Indian tax administration issues final rules on certain aspects for determining buy-back tax in India Executive summary

Guidance Note on FATCA and CRS dated 30 November Key clarifications

EY Tax Alert. Executive summary. CBDT provides clarifications on Direct Tax Dispute Resolution Scheme, September 2016

EY Regulatory Alert. Executive summary. SEBI releases Discussion Paper on review of framework for Institutional Trading

GST: How it will impact advertising budgets? June 2017

EY Tax Alert. Executive summary

Control premium in India. Ernst & Young LLP July 2017

EY Tax Alert. Executive summary. SC settles certain controversies on profit-linked deduction for export units. 21 December 2016

EY Tax Alert Central Government notifies the transactions of listed equity shares not eligible for Long Term capital gains exemption

EY Tax Alert. Executive summary. Mumbai Tribunal rules on legality and taxability of certain gift transactions by corporates.

EY India Defence EY s point of view on amended Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) Policy on Defence Sector

CBEC releases draft rules on Assessment and Audit under GST and E-Way Bill. The key highlights of the rules are as under:

Mumbai Tribunal rules charterer includes slot charter arrangement for availing treaty benefit under Article 8 of India Malaysia DTAA

CBDT amends rules relating to furnishing information in respect of payments to nonresidents

EY India Real Estate EY s point of view on Amended Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) Policy on Construction Development Sector

Mumbai Tribunal rules on DAPE in case of marketing and distribution activities carried out by an Indian branch for group companies

Amendments to the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Alternative Investment Funds) Regulations, Executive summary

EY Tax Alert. Executive summary. Bangalore Tribunal rules on deductibility of employee share reward discount cross-charged by foreign parent company

EY Tax Alert. Executive summary

Tax Alert Key amendments at enactment stage of Finance Bill, 2018

Karnataka High Court rules that implementation of customized software is a service and cannot be subject to VAT

Delhi Tribunal rules on indirect transfer of shares on transaction undertaken in 2006

CBDT revises rules relating to furnishing information in respect of payments to nonresidents

Bombay HC rules that appropriate State for levy and collection of CST is the State from where movement of goods commences

CBDT releases second round of FAQs on Income Declaration Scheme, 2016

EY Tax Alert. Executive summary

EY Tax Alert. Executive summary

Reserve Bank of India releases draft guidelines for on tap licensing of Universal Banks in the private sector

EY Tax Alert. Mumbai Tribunal rules intercompany

EY Tax Alert. Executive summary

Operational, prudential and reporting norms for Alternative Investment Funds. Executive summary

Government of India amends Income Computation and Disclosure Standards and also defers them by one year to tax year

Reserve Bank of India releases final guidelines for on tap licensing of Universal Banks in the private sector

EY Tax Alert. Executive summary. CBDT notifies guidelines for onshore management of offshore funds. 17 March 2016

Kerala HC upholds the constitutional validity of levy of Service tax on admission and access to entertainment event & amusement facilities

EY Regulatory Alert. Executive summary

EY Tax Alert. Executive summary

EY Tax Alert. Executive summary

EY Tax Alert. Executive summary

Applying Ind AS 115 Automotive: The new revenue recognition standard

EY Tax Alert. Executive summary. Kolkata Tribunal rules on taxability of online advertisement revenues. 18 April mber 2012

EY Tax Alert. CBEC issues clarifications on exports-related refund issues. Executive summary

EY Tax Alert. Executive summary. CBDT sets up a Committee to deal with retroactive indirect transfer taxation. 1 September 2014

EY Tax Alert. Executive summary. Mumbai Tribunal rules write-down of investment loss allowable if a direct and proximate nexus exists with a business

EY Tax Alert. Executive summary

EY Tax Alert. Executive summary. Third Protocol amending the India-Singapore tax treaty signed. 31 December 2016

Transfer pricing for Specified Domestic Transactions

This Tax Alert summarizes the key indirect tax proposals in the Maharashtra State Budget for the financial year

EY Tax Alert. Executive summary. Supreme Court upholds initiation of prosecution for failure to file return. 3 February 2014

EY Tax Alert. Executive summary

High Court rules that in-transit sale in turnkey contracts not eligible for exemption under Section 6(2) of the Central Sales Tax Act

EY Regulatory Alert. Executive summary

EY Tax Alert. Executive summary

EY Tax Alert. Executive summary. Hyderabad Tribunal reaffirms the distinction between use of copyright right and copyrighted article.

Securities and Exchange Board of India and the Reserve Bank of India issue guidelines for international financial services centres

EY Tax Alert. Executive summary. Government of India notifies the entities eligible to issue tax free bonds for financial year

EY Tax Alert. Executive summary. CBDT notifies ITR Forms for Company/ Firms/ LLP/ Trusts and others. 05 August 2015 October 2014

EY Tax Alert. Executive summary

Transcription:

4 April 2017 EY Tax Alert Delhi Tribunal rules on advertisement and promotion expenses involving use of trademarks as not royalty Executive summary Tax Alerts cover significant tax news, developments and changes in legislation that affect Indian businesses. They act as technical summaries to keep you on top of the latest tax issues. For more information, please contact your EY advisor. This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Delhi Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (Tribunal), in the case of Reebok India Company (Taxpayer) [1]. The Tribunal was concerned with the issue of taxability of payments made by the Taxpayer to the International Cricket Council (ICC) for acquiring advertisement, promotion and other commercial rights in relation to ICC events, under the Indian Tax Laws (ITL). The Tribunal held that payments made for acquiring advertisement and promotion rights, even if it involves incidental use of logos, trademarks/brand names of ICC (ICC marks), will not qualify as royalty under the ITL. However, payments made solely for the use of ICC marks in the manufacture and sale of licensed products qualify as royalty under the ITL. [1] [TS-112-ITAT-2017(DEL)]

Background and facts The Taxpayer, an Indian company, was part of a global brand that carried on the business of creating and marketing sports and lifestyle products. The Taxpayer entered into an agreement with ICC [2], the official international governing body for cricket, for granting promotional, advertising, marketing and other commercial rights on a worldwide basis in connection with ICC events. Under the agreement, the Taxpayer was required to make two categories of payments to ICC: The first category of payment was referred to as rights fee. This payment was made for a bundle of 21 rights which, inter-alia, included payment for obtaining the following rights: To display boards and signage on match grounds. To use past videos and footage from matches for internal and promotional/advertising purposes. To use designations such as official partner of ICC, ICC official cricket equipment supplier etc. To promote itself on the ICC website and other related websites as the official sponsor of ICC events. To receive complimentary tickets for ICC events and also to purchase tickets on a preferential basis. To display and sell licensed products at ICC events through the existing concessionaires. To identify backdrops for ICC events and other official press conferences concerning major ICC events, commensurate with the level of the Taxpayer s sponsorship rights. To access specified zones at ICC events for brand promotion. To use ICC marks in connection with the manufacture, distribution, advertising, promotion and sale of the Taxpayer s products. The second category in the agreement included payment of royalty for sale of licensed products manufactured by the Taxpayer using ICC marks. Thus, both the first and second categories included payments for the right to use ICC marks in the manufacture and sale of the Taxpayer s products. The Taxpayer contended that the payment of rights fee under the first category was not in the nature of royalty or fees for technical services (FTS). However, the Tax Authority held it to be royalty and/or FTS and disallowed the entire payment made towards rights fee by the Taxpayer for failure to withhold taxes. The Dispute Resolution Panel reversed the decision of the Tax Authority and held that rights fee was not in the nature of royalty or FTS and, hence, not taxable under the ITL. Aggrieved, the Tax Authority appealed before the Tribunal. Taxability of the payment under the second category as royalty was not under dispute as no payment in the nature of royalty was paid during the relevant tax year. [2] ICC is a tax resident of the British Virgin Islands and India does not have a Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement with the British Virgin Islands.

Tribunal s ruling Taxability of rights other than rights in relation to use of ICC marks in the manufacture and sale of the Taxpayer s products While the second category of payment was exclusively for the use of ICC marks in the manufacture and sale of products, the first category of payment, also referred to as rights fee, was for granting rights to a bundle of 21 rights which, inter alia, included the right to use ICC marks in advertisement, promotion, marketing and sale of products. Out of the 21 rights in respect of which the rights fee was paid under the first category of payment, only part of the rights involved use of ICC marks for the purpose of advertisement and promotion. In cases where the advertisement/ promotion rights did not involve the use of designation/icc marks, there would be no question of treating it as royalty and it would qualify as a pure advertisement expense. Furthermore, even the rights, exercise of which involved use of ICC marks, such use being for the limited purpose of advertisement and promotion and used alongside the Taxpayer s trademark/logo etc., and not for sale of licensed products, do not constitute royalty under the ITL. Reliance in this regard was placed on the Delhi High Court decision in the case of Sheraton International Inc., wherein it was held that the use of trademark, trade name etc., in rendering of advertisement, publicity and sales promotion services is neither in the nature of royalty nor FTS. In the absence of any separate consideration for the right to manufacture under the rights fee, and there being no mechanism for apportioning rights fee towards the use of ICC marks for the manufacture and sale of licensed products, no part of the rights fee is attributable to the use of ICC marks for the manufacture and sale of licensed products, consideration of which is exclusively covered under the royalty clause of the agreement. Accordingly, only the payment made by the Taxpayer under the second category, which is not for advertisement and promotion but for the use of ICC marks in the manufacture and sale of products, qualifies as royalty under the ITL. Taxability of rights in relation to use of ICC marks in the manufacture and sale of the Taxpayer s products In general, payments made for use of trademark, patents etc., on goods manufactured and sold qualify as royalty under the ITL. In the present case, there is an overlap in the two categories of payments specified in the agreement ( rights fee and royalty ). The right to use ICC marks in the manufacture and sale of products is covered both by the first category ( rights fee ) as well as the second category of payment ( royalty ).

Comments This is a welcome ruling for the Taxpayer. The issue involved taxability of a composite payment, pursuant to an agreement for advertisement and promotion of the Taxpayer, as royalty. The Tribunal s ruling confirms that an agreement, as a whole, needs to be seen to understand the objective and nature of payment. The Tribunal reiterates the view of the Delhi High Court in Sheraton International Inc. (supra), which supports the proposition that payment for acquiring advertisement and promotion rights, although involving incidental use of trademarks and brand names, does not qualify as royalty. However, where the payment is not for advertisement, but predominantly for the use of the trademarks and brand names, it qualifies as royalty under the ITL.

Our offices Ahmedabad 2nd floor, Shivalik Ishaan Near C.N. Vidhyalaya Ambawadi Ahmedabad - 380 015 Tel: + 91 79 6608 3800 Fax: + 91 79 6608 3900 Bengaluru 6th, 12th & 13th floor UB City, Canberra Block No.24 Vittal Mallya Road Bengaluru - 560 001 Tel: + 91 80 4027 5000 + 91 80 6727 5000 + 91 80 2224 0696 Fax: + 91 80 2210 6000 Ground Floor, A wing Divyasree Chambers # 11, O Shaughnessy Road Langford Gardens Bengaluru - 560 025 Tel: +91 80 6727 5000 Fax: +91 80 2222 9914 Chandigarh 1st Floor, SCO: 166-167 Sector 9-C, Madhya Marg Chandigarh - 160 009 Tel: +91 172 331 7800 Fax: +91 172 331 7888 Chennai Tidel Park, 6th & 7th Floor A Block (Module 601,701-702) No.4, Rajiv Gandhi Salai Taramani, Chennai - 600 113 Tel: + 91 44 6654 8100 Fax: + 91 44 2254 0120 Delhi NCR Golf View Corporate Tower B Sector 42, Sector Road Gurgaon - 122 002 Tel: + 91 124 464 4000 Fax: + 91 124 464 4050 3rd & 6th Floor, Worldmark-1 IGI Airport Hospitality District Aerocity, New Delhi - 110 037 Tel: + 91 11 6671 8000 Fax + 91 11 6671 9999 Hyderabad Oval Office, 18, ilabs Centre Hitech City, Madhapur Hyderabad - 500 081 Tel: + 91 40 6736 2000 Fax: + 91 40 6736 2200 Jamshedpur 1st Floor, Shantiniketan Building Holding No. 1, SB Shop Area Bistupur, Jamshedpur 831 001 Tel: +91 657 663 1000 BSNL: +91 657 223 0441 Kochi 9th Floor, ABAD Nucleus NH-49, Maradu PO Kochi - 682 304 Tel: + 91 484 304 4000 Fax: + 91 484 270 5393 Kolkata 22 Camac Street 3rd Floor, Block C Kolkata - 700 016 Tel: + 91 33 6615 3400 Fax: + 91 33 2281 7750 Mumbai 14th Floor, The Ruby 29 Senapati Bapat Marg Dadar (W), Mumbai - 400 028 Tel: + 91 22 6192 0000 Fax: + 91 22 6192 1000 5th Floor, Block B-2 Nirlon Knowledge Park Off. Western Express Highway Goregaon (E) Mumbai - 400 063 Tel: + 91 22 6192 0000 Fax: + 91 22 6192 3000 Pune C-401, 4th floor Panchshil Tech Park Yerwada (Near Don Bosco School) Pune - 411 006 Tel: + 91 20 6603 6000 Fax: + 91 20 6601 5900 Ernst & Young LLP EY Assurance Tax Transactions Advisory About EY EY is a global leader in assurance, tax, transaction and advisory services. The insights and quality services we deliver help build trust and confidence in the capital markets and in economies the world over. We develop outstanding leaders who team to deliver on our promises to all of our stakeholders. In so doing, we play a critical role in building a better working world for our people, for our clients and for our communities. EY refers to the global organization and may refer to one or more of the member firms of Ernst & Young Global Limited, each of which is a separate legal entity. Ernst & Young Global Limited, a UK company limited by guarantee, does not provide services to clients. For more information about our organization, please visit ey.com. Ernst & Young LLP is one of the Indian client serving member firms of EYGM Limited. For more information about our organization, please visit www.ey.com/in. Ernst & Young LLP is a Limited Liability Partnership, registered under the Limited Liability Partnership Act, 2008 in India, having its registered office at 22 Camac Street, 3rd Floor, Block C, Kolkata 700016. 2017 Ernst & Young LLP. Published in India. All Rights Reserved. ED None This publication contains information in summary form and is therefore intended for general guidance only. It is not intended to be a substitute for detailed research or the exercise of professional judgment. Neither Ernst & Young LLP nor any other member of the global Ernst & Young organization can accept any responsibility for loss occasioned to any person acting or refraining from action as a result of any material in this publication. On any specific matter, reference should be made to the appropriate advisor. 4th & 5th Floor, Plot No 2B Tower 2, Sector 126 NOIDA - 201 304 Gautam Budh Nagar, U.P. Tel: + 91 120 671 7000 Fax: + 91 120 671 7171 EY refers to global organization, and/or one or more of the independent member firms of Ernst & Young Global Limited Join India Tax Insights from EY on