The FCA s approach to advancing its objectives

Similar documents
CP3/14 Solvency II: recognition of deferred tax. Institute and Faculty of Actuaries consultation response to the Prudential Regulation Authority

The draft Occupational Pension Schemes (Employer Debt) (Amendment) Regulations IFoA response to Department for Work and Pensions

Comment Letter No Consultation response IFRS Exposure Draft ED/2010/9 : Leases

Consultation Paper: Key Attributes of Effective Resolution Regimes in the Insurance Sector IFoA response to Financial Stability Board

Quality Assurance Scheme for Organisations

The Personal Injury Discount Rate - How it should be set in future. IFoA response to the Ministry of Justice

Pension freedoms inquiry IFoA response to Work and Pensions Committee

Financial Reporting Council Update

Second PPF Levy Triennium: 2015/16 to 2017/18. Consultation response

Reporting UK Progress on Sustainable Development Goals

Financial Regulation Strategy HM Treasury 1 Horse Guards Road London SW1A 2HQ. 14 April 2011.

NEW ZEALAND SOCIETY OF ACTUARIES PROFESSIONAL STANDARD NO. 10 CONTINUING PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT MANDATORY STATUS EFFECTIVE DATE: 1 JANUARY 2008

Quality Assurance Scheme: Handbook

Supervisory Statement SS1/16 Written reports by external auditors to the PRA. January 2016

The distinct nature of insurance business and the introduction of a specific insurance objective;

Proposed amendments to IAS 19 and IFRIC 14. IFoA response to IASB

We refer to the discussion document on options for extending the Accredited Employers Programme and introducing choice in the Work Account.

Martin Wheatley Financial Services Authority 25 The North Colonnade Canary Wharf London E14 5HS. 21st February 2013.

Review Draft: Technical Actuarial Standard 100 Principles for Technical Actuarial Work

Consultation Paper - Draft technical standards under the Benchmarks Regulation

Introduction. Why is the IFoA launching a new curriculum? How will the new curriculum look?

New regulatory framework for insurance:

Peter Cardinali Finance and Operations Fees Policy Financial Conduct Authority 25 The North Colonnade Canary Wharf London E14 5HS.

Feedback Statement. Guidance on the Going Concern Basis of Accounting and Reporting on Solvency and Liquidity Risks

Consultation Paper Handbook changes to reflect the application of the EU Benchmarks Regulation

International Actuarial Association (IAA) Kurt Wolfsdorf, Immediate Past President Presentation to CONAC October 15, 2014 Mexico City

Response from Council of the Society of Actuaries in Ireland to Institute and Faculty of Actuaries consultation on Qualification Framework

Mortgage Market Review: Responsible Lending

Consultation: Revised Specifi c TASs Annex 2: TAS 300 Pensions

DEVELOPMENT of an ACTUARIAL PROFESSIONAL BODY in SINGAPORE. Yangon, Myanmar. 14 July 2014

Consultation: Revised Specifi c TASs Annex 1: TAS 200 Insurance

From cradle to grave - EIOPA s dynamic approach to restoring consumer confidence in the sale of general insurance products.

PREPARING AN AUDIT REPORT FOR A GROUP COMBINED AUDIT REPORT FOR THE GROUP AND PARENT COMPANY September 2018

Scenario of Actuarial profession in Bangladesh. Presented by A.K.M. Elias Hussain.

Request for Information Comprehensive Review of the IFRS for SMEs. response to request. 3 December 2012

Response to the consultation on the Wates Corporate Governance Principles for Large Private Companies

Post Implementation Review Providing Assurance on Client Assets to the Financial Conduct Authority Call for Feedback

Research and Thought Leadership at the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries

Proposed Revision to the UK Stewardship Code Annex A - Revised UK Stewardship Code

CERTIFIED ACTUARIAL ANALYST QUALIFICATION. Invest in your company s greatest assets

Framework for FRC technical actuarial standards

ICAEW is pleased to respond to your request for comments on Debt management (and credit repair services) guidance.

Technical Actuarial Standard 200: Insurance

ICAEW REPRESENTATION 191/16

Consultation: Revised Specifi c TASs Exposure draft: TAS 300 Pensions

Code of Professional Conduct Review 2017

October 2012 JOURNEY TO THE FCA. What should we expect?

SUBMISSION TO THE PARLIAMENTARY JOINT COMMITTEE ON ON CORPORATIONS AND FINANCIAL SERVICES

The High-Level Group on Financial Supervision in the EU - Larosière Report -

Guidelines on Continuing Professional Development (CPD)

Solvency and Financial Condition Report 20I6

Local Government Pension Scheme: Revoking and replacing the Local Government Pension Scheme (Management and Investment of Funds) Regulations 2009

Regulating financial services

The Morris Review. Peter Clark Institute of Actuaries

Solvency and Financial Condition Report 20I7

Certified Actuarial Analyst (CAA) a truly global qualification. Trevor Watkins

Topical Professional Issues for Actuaries

Tyne & Wear Archives & Museums Joint Committee. Annual audit letter to the Members of the Joint Committee for the year ended 31 March 2015

This proposal is called Strengthening Accountability in banking: a new regulatory framework for individuals.

Supervisory Statement SS35/15 Strengthening individual accountability in insurance. July 2018 (Updating February 2018)

ICAEW REPRESENTATION 07/18

Annual Conference of The Hong Kong Confederation of Insurance Brokers 26 October Opening Address by Mr John Leung CEO of the Insurance Authority

Why is the IFoA launching a new curriculum? Personal and Professional Development (PPD) Transferring from Core Technical to Core Principles

Financial Conduct Authority 25 The North Colonnade Canary Wharf London E14 5HS. 26 January 2018

Primary Markets Policy team Financial Conduct Authority 25 The North Colonnade Canary Wharf London E14 5HS 21 July 2017

AFM Response to FCA Fees Review

Supervisory Statement SS5/16 Corporate governance: Board responsibilities. July 2018 (Updating March 2016)

Government response to Parliamentary Commission on Banking Standards

Policy Statement PS16/16 Implementing audit committee requirements under the revised Statutory Audit Directive. May 2016

Policy Statement PS9/19 Solvency II: Group own fund availability. March 2019

Form E Internal transfer of an approved person (for Solvency II firms only 1 )

The ICAEW is pleased to respond to your request for comments on Tracing employers liability insurers.

Scenario of Actuarial study program in Bangladesh.

Respond to the consultation proposals; and Highlight the need for a proportionate approach that avoids a onesize-fits-all

Regulatory reform. Operating twin peaks and the move towards legal cutover (LCO)

CP 13/17 Consultation on the use of dealing commission rules

Engagement between external auditors and supervisors and commencing the PRA s disciplinary powers over external auditors and actuaries

INSTITUTE AND FACULTY OF ACTUARIES. Accreditation agreement between the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries and The University of Hong Kong

Sent electronically through at

We expect firms' ECL-related priorities for 2018 and beyond to include, in addition to the work already mentioned on consistency and disclosure:

PREPARING AN AUDIT REPORT FOR MICRO-ENTITIES February 2018

Society of Actuaries in Ireland Requirements for Reserving and Pricing for Non Life Insurers and Reinsurers

PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICES OF FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

Subject ST2 Life Insurance Specialist Technical Syllabus

Hermes Investment Management/Hermes EOS Response to the FRC Proposed Revisions to the UK Stewardship Code

We have carefully considered the Trustees Strategy Review and offer the following general comments:

PRA RULEBOOK: SOLVENCY II FIRMS, NON-SOLVENCY II FIRMS: SENIOR INSURANCE MANAGERS REGIME AMENDMENT INSTRUMENT 2016

European Association of Co-operative Banks Groupement Européen des Banques Coopératives Europäische Vereinigung der Genossenschaftsbanken

Policy Statement PS16/17 Dealing with a market turning event in the general insurance sector. July 2017

October 12, Technical Director International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board 545 Fifth Avenue, 14 th Floor New York, NY USA

Evolution of the Society of Actuaries in Ireland

The FRC and its Regulatory Approach

Strengthening individual accountability in insurance: SIMR, conduct rules and approved persons

Proposed Implementation of the Enforcement Review and the Green Report

International Valuation Standards Council (IVSC) Exposure Draft. Illustrative Examples: Chapter 1 - Bases of Value

Enhanced Auditor Reporting Implementation of New and Revised Standards

TREVOR LLANWARNE GOVERNMENT ACTUARY UNITED KINGDOM

Supervising retail investment advice: inducements and conflicts of interest

Seminario Internacional IAMCH Santiago, Chile. Thursday, March 13, David G. Hartman, FCAS, MAAA, FCIA President of the IAA (2008)

Cosmo Gibson Redress Policy, Strategy & Competition Financial Conduct Authority 25 The North Colonnade Canary Wharf London E14 5HS. About Which?

Transcription:

The FCA s approach to advancing its objectives Consultation Response 27 September 2013

About the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries The Institute and Faculty of Actuaries is the chartered professional body for actuaries in the United Kingdom. A rigorous examination system is supported by a programme of continuous professional development and a professional code of conduct supports high standards, reflecting the significant role of the Profession in society. Actuaries training is founded on mathematical and statistical techniques used in insurance, pension fund management and investment and then builds the management skills associated with the application of these techniques. The training includes the derivation and application of mortality tables used to assess probabilities of death or survival. It also includes the financial mathematics of interest and risk associated with different investment vehicles from simple deposits through to complex stock market derivatives. Actuaries provide commercial, financial and prudential advice on the management of a business assets and liabilities, especially where long term management and planning are critical to the success of any business venture. A majority of actuaries work for insurance companies or pension funds either as their direct employees or in firms which undertake work on a consultancy basis but they also advise individuals and offer comment on social and public interest issues. Members of the profession have a statutory role in the supervision of pension funds and life insurance companies as well as a statutory role to provide actuarial opinions for managing agents at Lloyd s.

Early Intervention Team 27 September 2013 Cross Cutting, Prudential and Early Intervention Department PRR Division Financial Conduct Authority 25 The North Colonnade London E14 5HS Dear Sirs, The FCA s approach to advancing its objectives The Institute and Faculty of Actuaries (IFoA) welcomes the opportunity to provide feedback on the FCA s guidance document, The FCA s approach to advancing its objectives. The IFoA is the chartered professional body for actuaries, responsible for regulating its members worldwide, in the public interest. That responsibility extends to setting qualification and competence standards, which are assessed through a rigorous examination framework, and are reinforced by: a practising certificates regime; a well-established ethical Code; practice standards; CPD and disciplinary enforcement. The IFoA is overseen in relation to the exercise of its regulatory function in the UK by the Financial Reporting Council. Many of the IFoA s members work for organisations in which the FCA also has a regulatory interest; either as a result of its direct regulatory responsibility for those organisations, or through its regulation of the markets in which they operate. The IFoA is a Designated Professional Body for the purposes of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 and is therefore overseen by the FCA in relation to its regulation of actuarial firms licensed under that regime. The FCA s commitment to openness and accessibility The IFoA welcomes the importance that the FCA places on transparency. Transparency is critical in allowing stakeholders to understand the FCA s approach and the expectations it places on those it regulates; it therefore promotes quality and the attainment of standards, to the benefit of consumers. The IFoA is supportive of the FCA in its mission to be a transparent and open regulator, including in the sharing of knowledge and insight on issues relevant to and which inform the regulatory agenda. We believe we can help with this. The IFoA is in a position to contribute impartial comment, data and evidence relating to actuarial issues from the IFoA s own specialist research and horizonscanning activities. The IFoA would appreciate the opportunity to discuss with the FCA what more we might do to support you in the pursuit of our shared public interest agendas.

The FCA s regulatory approach and objectives The IFoA notes the FCA s three overarching objectives concerning consumer protection, market integrity and competition. As indicated at a number of points in the guidance, the application of these principles will require the exercise of careful judgement, according to the individual circumstances. The IFoA would find it helpful to understand how, more specifically, the FCA envisages exercising this judgement, particularly where, conceivably, one or more of the principles might be seen to conflict - for example, the consumer protection and competition objectives. The IFoA assumes that the overriding consideration will be the public interest and we would welcome further clarification as to how the FCA envisages that this concept will be applied in determining the relative weight to be attributed to its respective objectives in practice. The IFoA commends the FCA s ongoing commitment to being a risk and evidence-based regulator. While noting the FCA s commitment to be tougher and bolder, following a strategy of credible deterrence, and using new powers of intervention and enforcement ( Our aims section of Chapter 1 of the FCA s guidance document), the IFoA would observe that increased powers and enforcement do not necessarily generate better regulatory outcomes, such powers need to be appropriately targeted. The challenge for any regulator is to act not only decisively and effectively but also proportionately, appropriately and only where there is a demonstrable basis for regulatory intervention. It strikes the IFoA as being critical that regulators have all of the necessary relevant information to act from a position of informed awareness in seeking to make well-founded regulatory decisions, not least in order to undertake an accurate assessment of risk. This has been a key focus of an initiative in which the IFoA has recently collaborated with the FRC. The IFoA seeks the opportunity to discuss further with the FCA how it intends to ensure it remains appropriately informed, and what the IFoA might do to support the FCA in that objective. Ongoing feedback from across the market will no doubt be important, not least in helping the FCA to continue, as the IFoA assumes it envisages, to review and evaluate the effectiveness of its proposed regulatory approach. The IFoA would be pleased to play a part in this through regular interaction with you going forward. The importance of effective integration and cohesion in relation to regulatory policy The guidance refers in a number of respects to the importance of joined up regulation. It mentions specifically the FCA s critical relationship with the PRA, and with other UK and international regulators. The IFoA would find it helpful to understand more fully how the division of responsibilities between the FCA and PRA, in particular, will work in practice. By way of specific example, it is not entirely clear to us where, as between the FCA and PRA, responsibility for assessing Approved persons will now lie. The IFoA appreciates that such issues are likely to become clearer as the new regime becomes embedded.

More generally, the IFoA welcomes the FCA s commitment to integrated and cohesive regulation. We recognise that the financial services sector as a whole is a complex regulatory environment and this complexity brings with it the obvious risk of regulatory gaps and duplication, as well as potential misunderstanding and confusion. This cannot be to the detriment of consumers, for whom the rapidly changing arrangements constitute something of a maze. The IFoA will continue to value opportunities to engage with the FCA in relation to policy and regulatory matters and, in particular, for the appropriate sharing of information in relation to issues relevant to the fulfilment of our own public interest responsibilities. As a specific example, we would be keen to have an early discussion with the FCA on the IFoA s developing thinking around the appropriate regulation of those IFoA members who undertake the Actuarial Function role under Solvency II. This is an issue on which the IFoA has had some discussion with the PRA, recognising the shared priority to ensure that those undertaking this role have, and are able to demonstrate, the necessary skills and competence to perform what the IFoA see as a key public interest function. However, we believe that the role also impacts upon aspects of the FCA s operational objectives and would be keen to explore the implications of this further with you. The IFoA hopes that these comments are helpful, and we look forward to working with the FCA on a number of issues of mutual interest over the coming months. If you have any immediate questions arising from our comments, please do not hesitate to contact Paul Shelley (paul.shelley@actuaries.org.uk or 07917604985). Yours faithfully, David Hare President, Institute and Faculty of Actuaries