Subprime Lending in Tennessee

Similar documents
DATA AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2010

Q309 NATIONAL DELINQUENCY SURVEY FROM THE MORTGAGE BANKERS ASSOCIATION. Data as of September 30, 2009

Q209 NATIONAL DELINQUENCY SURVEY FROM THE MORTGAGE BANKERS ASSOCIATION. Data as of June 30, 2009

Providing Subprime Consumers with Access to Credit: Helpful or Harmful? James R. Barth Auburn University

Impacts of Prepayment Penalties and Balloon Loans on Foreclosure Starts, in Selected States: Supplemental Tables

Media Alert. First American CoreLogic Releases Q3 Negative Equity Data

Ability-to-Repay Statutes

February 2018 QUARTERLY CONSUMER CREDIT TRENDS. Public Records

Q Homeowner Confidence Survey Results. May 20, 2010

Kentucky , ,349 55,446 95,337 91,006 2,427 1, ,349, ,306,236 5,176,360 2,867,000 1,462

Union Members in New York and New Jersey 2018

Income from U.S. Government Obligations

FHA Streamline Offering 8/15/14

State Individual Income Taxes: Personal Exemptions/Credits, 2011

J.P. Morgan Funds 2018 Distribution Notice

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE August 26, 2010

AUGUST MORTGAGE INSURANCE DATA AT A GLANCE

Annual Costs Cost of Care. Home Health Care

# of Credit Unions As of March 31, 2011

The Costs and Benefits of Half a Loaf: The Economic Effects of Recent Regulation of Debit Card Interchange Fees. Robert J. Shapiro

Community Development Block Grants: Legislative Proposals to Assist Communities Affected by Home Foreclosures

State Corporate Income Tax Collections Decline Sharply

Undocumented Immigrants are:

Federal Registry. NMLS Federal Registry Quarterly Report Quarter I

April 20, and More After That, Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, March 27, First Street NE, Suite 510 Washington, DC 20002

# of Credit Unions As of September 30, 2011

Sales Tax Return Filing Thresholds by State

American Economics Group Clear and Effective Economic Analysis. American Economics Group

H E C M F O R P U R C H A S E HOME BUYER S GUIDE

504 Loan Program Rural Initiative - Waiver of Limitation on Lending Authority

The Effect of the Federal Cigarette Tax Increase on State Revenue

Mapping the geography of retirement savings

Federal Rates and Limits

Checkpoint Payroll Sources All Payroll Sources

The Impact of Third-Party Debt Collection on the US National and State Economies in 2016

HAC USDA RURAL DEVELOPMENT HOUSING ACTIVITY. Rural Research Report. Housing Assistance Council FISCAL YEAR 2017 YEAR-END REPORT

Pay Frequency and Final Pay Provisions

Motor Vehicle Sales/Use, Tax Reciprocity and Rate Chart-2005

AIG Benefit Solutions Producer Licensing and Appointment Requirements by State


Producer ( Distributor ) Commission Schedule

Residual Income Requirements

FHA Manual Underwriting Exceeding 31% / 43% DTI Eligibility Quick Reference

SECTION 109 HOST STATE LOAN-TO-DEPOSIT RATIOS. The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the Federal Deposit Insurance

MEDICAID BUY-IN PROGRAMS

Chapter D State and Local Governments

PAY STATEMENT REQUIREMENTS

ATHENE Performance Elite Series of Fixed Index Annuities

State Income Tax Tables

STATE MINIMUM WAGES 2017 MINIMUM WAGE BY STATE

Health care economics. Ellen Andrews, PhD SCSU Spring 2018

Best Practices for Borrower Ability to Repay Rules

One-Time Close Loan. Your guide to your new home construction loan

Nation s Uninsured Rate for Children Drops to Another Historic Low in 2016

Termination Final Pay Requirements

Fingerprint, Biographical Affidavit and Third-Party Verification Reports Requirements

State Minimum Wage Chart (See below for Local/City Minimum Wage Chart)

Economic Impacts of Wait Times for Commercial Driver s Licenses Skills Tests

How Much Would a State Earned Income Tax Credit Cost in Fiscal Year 2018?

The table below reflects state minimum wages in effect for 2014, as well as future increases. State Wage Tied to Federal Minimum Wage *

Aetna Individual Direct Pay Commissions Schedule

Child Care Assistance Spending and Participation in 2016

Compendium of Financial Literacy Resources & Identity Theft Data

Total State and Local Business Taxes

TA X FACTS NORTHERN FUNDS 2O17

EBRI Databook on Employee Benefits Chapter 6: Employment-Based Retirement Plan Participation

Taxes and Economic Competitiveness. Dale Craymer President, Texas Taxpayers and Research Association (512)

Insurer Participation on ACA Marketplaces,

Interest Table 01/04/2010

MINIMUM WAGE WORKERS IN HAWAII 2013

Exhibit 57A. Approved Attorney Fees and Title Expenses

Recourse for Employees Misclassified as Independent Contractors Department for Professional Employees, AFL-CIO

Fingerprint and Biographical Affidavit Requirements

Minimum Wage Laws in the States - April 3, 2006

All Approved Insurance Providers All Risk Management Agency Field Offices All Other Interested Parties

The Economic Impact of Spending for Operations and Construction in 2013 by AZA-Accredited Zoos and Aquariums

Supporting innovation and economic growth. The broad impact of the R&D credit in Prepared by Ernst & Young LLP for the R&D Credit Coalition

Mutual Fund Tax Information

STATE BOND COMMISSION DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY. March 15, 2018

Mutual Fund Tax Information

STATE AND FEDERAL MINIMUM WAGES

For 2013 as a whole, aggregate tax revenues rose by 6.8% from year-ago levels, bringing them 11% above their pre-recession peak.

MainStay Funds Income Tax Information Notice

Spring 2011 State Forecast

The Impact of Third-Party Debt Collection on the U.S. National and State Economies in 2013

Dental Vision Life Disability

Eligible Mortgage Loans. Client Guide Chapter 2

State Unemployment Insurance Tax Survey

Understanding Oregon s Throwback Rule for Apportioning Corporate Income

White Paper 2018 STATE AND FEDERAL MINIMUM WAGES

NOTICE TO MEMBERS CANADIAN DERIVATIVES CORPORATION CANADIENNE DE. Trading by U.S. Residents

Papers presented at the ICES-III, June 18-21, 2007, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

(In effect as of January 1, 2006*) TABLE 17. OFFSET PROVISIONS IN STATE WORKERS' COMPENSATION LAWS

Mergers and Acquisitions and Top Income Shares

DFA INVESTMENT DIMENSIONS GROUP INC. DIMENSIONAL INVESTMENT GROUP INC. Institutional Class Shares January 2018

STATE REVENUE AND SPENDING IN GOOD TIMES AND BAD 5

ECONOMY AT A GLANCE. Figure 1. Leading indices. 1/18 2/18 3/18 4/18 5/18 6/18 7/18 8/18 9/18 10/1811/1812/18 1/19 Mississippi

CRS Report for Congress

Estimating the Number of People in Poverty for the Program Access Index: The American Community Survey vs. the Current Population Survey.

Total state and local business taxes

Transcription:

Subprime Lending in Tennessee July 19, 2007 Hulya Arik, Ph.D. Research Coordinator Graphic Design by Paul Henkel, A.B.D. Asst. Director for Research, Planning & Technical Services

Presentation Overview I. Housing Market Conditions in Tennessee II. III. IV. Subprime Mortgage Lending Some Trends in Subprime Lending Perspectives on Subprime Lending in Tennessee

Presentation Overview V. Extent of Subprime Lending in Tennessee VI. VII. Subprime Lending and Economic Fundamentals What Can We Do?

I. Housing Market Conditions in Tennessee Housing market in Tennessee is robust as both number of units sold and average price increased between 2005 and 2006. HOUSING MARKET CONDITIONS, 2005-2006 +8.6% $196,596 $181,050 +2.2% 77,299 79,017 Units Avg Price Note: These numbers are average prices annually and represent only the sales by real estate agents.

I. Housing Market Conditions in Tennessee However, the change in the number of units sold and the average price from the first quarter of 2006 to the same quarter in 2007 is not as favorable. HOUSING MARKET CONDITIONS, Q1:2006-Q1:2007 $180,888 $186,412-5.4% +3.1% 18,309 17,320 Units Sold Average Price Note: These numbers are average quarterly price and represent only the sales by real estate agents.

I. Housing Market Conditions in Tennessee HOME EQUITY CONCERNS - If the mortgage interest rate adjusts or any unexpected event happens such as job loss, medical bills, death or divorce: Selling the house instead of going through foreclosure might protect the borrower s credit. However, having low equity makes the borrower unable to refinance or sell without a significant loss. * Cagan, C.L. (2006), Mortgage Payment Reset: the Rumor and the Reality, First American Real Estate Solutions

I. Housing Market Conditions in Tennessee HOME EQUITY CONCERNS - Nationwide estimate: 1.1 million borrowers, out of 8.4 million with ARMs originated in 2004, 2005 and 2006, will lose their homes in the next six to seven years. - In Tennessee, almost 48 percent of mortgage holders have 15 percent or less equity in their homes.* * Cagan, C.L. (2006), Mortgage Payment Reset: the Rumor and the Reality, First American Real Estate Solutions

II. Subprime Mortgage Lending What is subprime mortgage? Mortgages to borrowers with (FICO) credit score below 620

II. Subprime Mortgage Lending Some Facts about Subprime Loans Used for refinancing and home purchase* Higher rates Mostly ARM Higher loan-to-value ratios Higher loan-to-income ratios *According to a recent study by Center for Responsible Lending, nationwide 56% of all subprime loans originated in 2006 were for refinancing. In Tennessee, in 2005, approximately 49% of subprime loans were for refinance.

II. Subprime Mortgage Lending Why is subprime mortgage important? Creates homeownership opportunities

II. Subprime Mortgage Lending Why is subprime mortgage important? Lets people use equity in their home This spending leads to additional rounds of spending, income and jobs in the economy through multiplier effect

II. Subprime Mortgage Lending However Leads to higher levels of delinquency and foreclosure Prone to abusive/predatory lending practices

II. Subprime Mortgage Lending Adverse effects may increase dramatically when overlapped with -Economic slowdown -Increasing unemployment rates -Decreasing home prices

III. Some Trends in Subprime Lending Nationally, subprime loans increased dramatically Up from $35 billion in 1994 to more than $530 billion in 2004*. According to Fed Chairman, based on data from Mortgage Banker Association, about 7.5 million firstlien subprime mortgages are now (2007) outstanding, accounting for about 14% of all first-lien mortgages. *Source: New Information Reported Under HMDA and its Application in Fair Lending Enforcement, Federal Reserve Board Bulletin, 2004

IV. Perspectives on Subprime Lending in Tennessee This is particularly important for Tennessee given that: Subprime lending in Tennessee is historically higher than in the U.S. In Q1 of 2007, subprime loans accounted for a larger share of the conventional market. And between Q1 of 2004 and Q1 of 2007, the share of subprime loans in Tennessee grew faster than the share nationwide.

Conventional Mortgage Market Share US & Tennessee Q1:2004 - Q1:2007 Source: MBA Delinquency Surveys and author s own calculations 80.0% 70.0% 60.0% 50.0% 40.0% 30.0% 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% 50.0% 40.0% 30.0% 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% 75% United States Prime FRM Subprime FRM Prime ARM Subprime ARM 80.0% Tennessee 70.0% 77% 60.0% Prime FRM Subprime FRM Prime ARM Subprime ARM 68% 73% 72% 11

Foreclosure Rates by Mortgage Type US & Tennessee 3.5% United States Prime FRM 3.0% 2.5% 2.0% 1.5% 1.0% 0.5% 0.0% 3.5% Tennessee Prime FRM Q1:2004 - Q1:2007 3.1% 3.0% 2.5% 2.0% 1.5% 1.0% 0.5% 0.0% 1.8% Subprime FRM Prime ARM Subprime ARM Subprime FRM Prime ARM Subprime ARM Source: MBA Delinquency Surveys and author s own calculations 14 2.7%

IV. Perspectives on Subprime Lending in Tennessee FORECLOSURES MARKET SHARE, 2007 (Q1) In Tennessee, subprime fixed rate loans represented 9.3 percent of conventional loans but 21.7 percent of all foreclosures More notably, Tennessee s subprime adjustable mortgage loans accounted for 8.5 percent of loans but accounted for 45 percent of foreclosures

IV. Perspectives on Subprime Lending in Tennessee Conventional Mortgage Products Share of Market and Foreclosures in Tennessee, 2007 (Q1) Market Share by Type Foreclosure Share by Type 9.5% 9.3% 8.5% 24.1% 72.7% Subprime Subprime Fixed Fixed Subprime Subprime Adjustable Adjustable Prime Prime Fixed Fixed Prime Prime Adjustable Adjustable 45.0% 21.7% 9.2% Source: MBA Delinquency Surveys and author s own calculations

IV. Perspectives on Subprime Lending in Tennessee FORECLOSURES MARKET SHARE, 2007 (Q1) Similarly, nationwide, subprime fixed rate loans represented 6.1 percent of conventional loans but 14.2 percent of all foreclosures And, nationwide, subprime adjustable mortgage loans accounted for 8.3 percent of loans but 48.2 percent of foreclosures

IV. Perspectives on Subprime Lending in Tennessee Conventional Mortgage Products Share of Market and Foreclosures in the U.S., 2007 (Q1) Market Share by Type Foreclosure Share by Type 68.3% 17.3% 6.1% 8.3% Subprime Fixed Subprime Fixed Subprime Adjustable Subprime Adjustable Prime Fixed Prime Fixed Prime Adjustable Prime Adjustable 48.2% 14.2% 21.0% 16.6% Source: MBA Delinquency Surveys and author s own calculations

Percent Seriously Delinquent, Q1:2007 (90 Days or more Delinquent Loans plus Foreclosure Inventory at the End of the Quarter) 1. Ohio 2. Mississippi 3. Indiana 4. Louisiana 5. Michigan 6. Kentucky 7. Georgia 9. Oklahoma 8. Pennsylvania 10. Tennessee 11. Texas 12. Illinois 13. S. Carolina 14. Colorado 15. Alabama 16. Iowa 17. Maine National Avg 20. Missouri 23. N. Carolina 25. Arkansas 26. W. Virginia 31. Florida 43. Virginia 50. Hawaii 0.7% 2.2% 2.7% +0.5% -2.4% 5.1% Source: MBA Delinquency Surveys and author s own calculations

IV. Perspectives on Subprime Lending in Tennessee FORECLOSURE FILINGS Number of foreclosure filings were 10,878 in the first quarter of 2007 in Tennessee. The latest monthly data (May 2007) indicates 3,823 foreclosure filings in Tennessee, one foreclosure for every 638 households.

IV. Perspectives on Subprime Lending in Tennessee Number of Foreclosures in Tennessee Q1:2005 Q1:2007 14,000 12,000 10,000 8,000 6,000 4,000 2,000 0 11,718 10,878-36% +45% 7,502 Q1:05 Q2:05 Q3:05 Q4:05 Q1:06 Q2:06 Q3:06 Q4:06 Q1:07 Source: RealtyTrac

V. Extent of Subprime Lending in Tennessee FACTS ABOUT TENNESSEE, 2005 Rates -About 75 percent of subprime mortgages are considered higher priced loans* * Higher priced loans are loans with prices above the threshold (rate spread between the interest rate on the loan and the rate on a Treasury security with comparable terms and maturity: 3% or above for first lien loans and 5% and above for junior lien loans)

V. Extent of Subprime Lending in Tennessee FACTS ABOUT TENNESSEE, 2005 Purpose -49 percent of subprime loans were for refinancing* *Nationwide, in 2006, 56% of all subprime loans were for home purchase

V. Extent of Subprime Lending in Tennessee FACTS ABOUT TENNESSEE, 2005 Geography -Nashville-Murfreesboro accounted for 34% of subprime loans. -Memphis accounted for another 31% of subprime loans.

VI. Subprime Lending and Economic Fundamentals Subprime lending is a major problem, but there is hope. - Fewer houses built means fewer houses waiting to be sold, presenting more opportunities for sale rather than foreclosure.* - In Tennessee, building permits declined by 2.4 percent from 2005 to 2006. *David Sieders, Chief Economist at National Association of Home Builders

VI. Subprime Lending and Economic Fundamentals Subprime lending is a major problem, but there is hope. -Economic conditions are favorable for a recovery in Tennessee. -Unemployment rate declined from 5.3% in May 2006 to 4.7% in May 2007. -Per capita income, increased from $30,969 in 2005 to $32,304 in 2006 (a 4.3 percent change)

VII. What can we do? Keep doing what we do best. Continue helping Tennessee families achieve dream of homeownership.

VII. What can we do? Keep doing what we do best. In 2006 Tennessee Housing Development Agency (THDA) helped 3,270 families to become first time homeowners the first time homeowners (30 percent higher than number of loans originated in 2005).

VII. What can we do? Keep doing what we do best. With the help of outreach programs and partnership with our originating agents, THDA was able to reach almost all counties in Tennessee, missing10 out of 95 counties.

VII. What can we do? Keep doing what we do best. June 2007 set an all-time record, in terms of $ value of loan applications received. Applications for 610 mortgages totaled $68.45 million.