GEEREF IMPACT METHODOLOGY

Similar documents
IBERDROLA FRAMEWORK FOR GREEN FINANCING (the Framework )

Annual Report on Bank of China s Green Bonds. Outstanding BOC Green Bonds

IBERDROLA FRAMEWORK FOR GREEN FINANCING

GEEREF NEXT. Environmental and Social Management System

The role of private sector in GHG mitigation

Second-Party Opinion Korea East-West Power Co. Ltd Sustainability Bond

ENEL Green Bond Framework

GREEN BOND FRAMEWORK

Targeting real world impact aligned with the Sustainable Development Goals

Cement Sustainability Initiative. Climate Finance. European Investment Bank

DANISH CLIMATE INVESTMENT FUND

Response to UNFCCC Secretariat request for proposals on: Information on strategies and approaches for mobilizing scaled-up climate finance (COP)

Green Climate Fund s Private Sector Clean Energy Initiatives. Jiwoo Choi Head of Financial Institutions and Structured Finance 14 March 2018

THE CARBON YIELD METHODOLOGY

Green Climate Fund: Private Sector Renewable Energy

Green Impact Report. Formosa 1. Introduction. Green Impact: Forecast GIG CARBON RATING: AAA

3. The paper draws on existing work and analysis. 4. To ensure that this analysis is beneficial to the

01 Pearson Sustainability report Performance data. Pearson Sustainability report 2017

Introduction to economics of climate change. Ankara, 5 September 2016

Green Impact Report Galloper Offshore Wind Farm. Executive summary

ENEL Green Bond Framework

+ 50% by In the short term: 50% increase in low carbon investments. + investment

Green Bond Principles, 2014 Voluntary Process Guidelines for Issuing Green Bonds

Fact sheet: Financing climate change action Investment and financial flows for a strengthened response to climate change

Bank of China Limited Sustainability Series Bonds Management Statement

UNCTAD World Investment Forum, Ministerial Round Table, 16/10/2014, 3 to 6 pm, Room XX, Palais des Nations

Environmental impact methodology

PGGM Responsible Investment in Real Estate

Bucharest, 21 May 2016 FINANCING PRODUCTS FOR EU FUNDS PROJECTS

Using Metrics and Targets in Climate Risk Disclosure

How to finance the transition to a low carbon economy: Private finance s role Ny-Ålesund Symposium May 2014

ANNEX. to the. Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council. establishing the InvestEU Programme

Key Messages. Climate negotiations can transform global and national financial landscapes. Climate, finance and development are closely linked

1. THE CEFC S ROLE IN FACILITATING THE FLOW OF FINANCE INTO THE CLEAN ENERGY SECTOR

Lending for impact An M&G Investments institutional perspective November 2016

Indian Railway Finance Corporation Ltd. Green Bond Framework

Solar Gr G e r en n Bond n s s Webinar July 2016

Bank of China Limited Green Bond Management Statement

Energy Efficiency in Buildings at the crossroad of European energy, cohesion and industrial policies

Position statement Danske Bank March 2018

Financial Instruments NCFF and PF4EE

SUBMISSION BY DENMARK AND THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION ON BEHALF OF THE EUROPEAN UNION AND ITS MEMBER STATES

ASEAN GREEN BOND STANDARDS

IS BRITISH COLUMBIA S CARBON TAX GOOD FOR HOUSEHOLD INCOME? WORKING PAPER

1,5 c or 2 C? Mind the Enabling Conditions

Company announcement from Vestas Wind Systems A/S

No An act relating to the Vermont energy act of (S.214) It is hereby enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Vermont:

Investment criteria indicators

Responsible investment in green bonds

Reporting criteria for Corporate Responsibility key performance indicators for the year 2015

Asset Financing Australia Report May 2014

PUBLIC VERSION GEEREF IMPACT REPORT 2017 CATALYSING BILLIONS FOR CLEAN POWER

How does going green affect firms financial performance? Evidence from a global firm level dataset.

Green Bond Framework

Czech Republic s Third National Communication under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, 2001.

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 11 May /10 ECOFIN 249 ENV 265 POLGEN 69

European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI):

QBE INSURANCE GROUP GREEN BOND

Westpac Climate Bond Impact Report. May 2017

Electric Price Outlook for Indiana High Load Factor (HLF) customers September 2015

Agribusiness & Forestry

H I G H L I G H T S. Financial Strength: Strong Asset Base Strong Capital Structure. High Credit Quality

Deep Dive into Policy Instruments Emissions Trading Schemes. Pablo Benitez, PhD World Bank Hanoi, Vietnam March 14, 2014

New York State Initiatives and Futures

Actual neighborhood of Sunrun customer homes

Responsibilities of the Management of Swedbank and DNV GL

Green Bond Guidelines for the Real Estate Sector

The climate impact of quantitative easing by Sini Matikainen, Emanuele Campiglio, and Dimitri Zenghelis

Scaling Up Financing for Sustainable Energy Investments Presented by:

Carbon Markets and Mexico Key Issues for Market Design

EU Funding for Sustainable Energy

Renewing Ireland's Energy European Investment Bank

The Pitfalls of Innovative Private Sector Financing

SECOND PARTY OPINION 1 ON THE SUSTAINABILITY OF ENEL S GREEN BOND 2

Eesti Energia Audited Financial Results for February 2019 Transcription

IMPACT INVESTING MARKET MAP

15889/10 PSJ/is 1 DG G

Carbon Tax a Good Idea for Developing Countries?

Austrian Climate Change Workshop Summary Report The Way forward on Climate and Sustainable Finance

EPA s Proposed Federal Plan and Model Trading Rules. Stakeholder Meeting Iowa DNR Air Quality Bureau November 16, 2015

TRANSFORMATIONAL NAMAS, CLIMATE FINANCE & TRANSITIONING TO A 2015 AGREEMENT

Perspectives on Fossil Fuel Divestment and Shareholder Action. March 19, 2014 Coal Finance 2014

Q4/17 Analyst Conference Call

(Text with EEA relevance) Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 192(1) thereof,

ACCELERATING SDG 7 ACHIEVEMENT POLICY BRIEF 05 FINANCING SDG 7

CGN INAUGURAL GREEN BOND ISSUANCE

CLIMATE-FRIENDLY ECONOMY: REDUCING EMISSIONS AND LIMITING CLIMATE CHANGE

Norwegian Submission on Strategies and Approaches for Scaling up Climate Finance

Tracking climate expenditure

4.5/ Almada s Climate Fund

Connecticut Green Bank Organization Fact Sheet

SECOND PARTY OPINION 1 ON THE SUSTAINABILITY OF ENGIE S GREEN BOND 2

Mongolian experience on household-level CDM PoA and other carbon finance

UK Working Paper: A project level approach to forecast and monitor private climate finance mobilised

regulation approach incentive approach

IAG Data Summary and Glossary of Terms 2012 AUSTRALIAN BUSINESS PERFORMANCE

CLIMATE RISK NORWEGIAN CLIMATE RISK COMMISSION PATRICK DU PLESSIS

Introduction to the UK Carbon Reduction Commitment

G20 Emerging Economies St. Petersburg Structural Reform Commitments: An Assessment

TAXATION AND ENERGY EFFICIENCY

Transcription:

S I T I, U G A N D A ( F RO N T I E R ) GEEREF IMPACT METHODOLOGY L a s t u p d a t e : M a y 2 0 1 5 Frontier Investment Management

INTRODUCTION The GEEREF team focuses on backing emerging investment teams active in the Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency sectors who share its values and who implement the highest international standards for responsible investment through their businesses and projects. These standards are described fully in the EIB s Environmental and Social Practices Handbook. By catalysing nascent managers, GEEREF is able to have a profound bearing upon its funds strategies and, particularly, their approaches to impact investing. This document sets out the key impact metrics that GEEREF and its funds track across the portfolio of investments. These metrics fall within four categories in line with GEEREF s policy objectives: 1. ENERGY 2. ENVIRONMENT 3. SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT 4. FINANCIAL LEVERAGE The metrics are calculated both on the actual results of portfolio projects in the reporting year and for their projected economic lifetimes of the projects. The metrics are reported annually in the GEEREF s impact report with additional quantitative information on the impacts of the projects financed. GEEREF is committed to the continued pursuit of best practice in impact reporting and welcomes all feedback. Sincerely, The GEEREF team

METHODOLOGY All Impact data are collected annually from GEEREF s fund managers and are analysed by the GEEREF team. The team collects data for the entire projects, rather than a pro rata share of them, with the underlying assumption that the projects would not have been financed without GEEREF support. The analysis comprises three layers of data: Actual reported values from the relevant financial year from each of the investments in each portfolio in that time period. This may include assets that have been fully operational in the financial year, partially operational or still in development or construction. Run-rate metrics for the existing portfolio and extrapolates for the assumption that all existing investments in the portfolio are fully Modelled metrics for the fully deployed portfolio, whereby each fund has fully invested all that capital committed to projects and these are fully This third approach makes a number of assumptions including total capital commitments, project sizes and technologies, capex and capacity factors in order to derive a set of metrics for what the whole GEEREF portfolio will deliver over its lifetime. The data collection exercise is divided into four Pillars: Energy, Environment, Sustainable Development and Financial Leverage. For the first three Pillars there are certain metrics that can be considered eligibility criteria for GEEREF (these are highlighted in black text below). Other impact criteria (in blue) require quantitative inputs from the fund managers. For the fourth Pillar, Financial Leverage, GEEREF reports on the mobilisation of funding at three layers: project level, fund level and GEEREF level. The project level multiplier assesses the total project capex (including fund equity, co-investment and debt) relative to the equity invested by the fund manager. The fund level multiplier assesses the total commitments that a fund has raised from all of its limited partners relative to the initial commitment made by GEEREF. The GEEREF level multiplier is essentially the project level multiplier times the fund level multiplier. A final calculation can be made for the impact achieved by the ODA investors in GEEREF who catalysed the private sector limited partners. This calculates the ratio of public to total commitments and derives a final multiplier for all capital invested through GEEREF s portfolio projects relative to the initial ODA commitments to GEEREF.

Eligibility Criteria GEEREF energy impact GEEREF innovation impact PILLAR 1: ENERGY > The percentage of renewable energy or energy efficiency infrastructure projects (excluding cleantech companies - see next indicator) in the portfolio of GEEREF funds that generate renewable energy or improve energy efficiency in the target regions. (typically 100%) > The percentage of renewable energy or energy efficiency technology R&D and equipment manufacturing companies (e.g. cleantech companies in the renewable energy or energy efficiency sector) in the portfolio of GEEREF funds (therefore excluding those cleantech companies in non-renewable energy or energy efficiency sectors, e.g. clean water, air or soil related). (typically 0%) Impact Criteria Installed capacity Total electricity produced Total energy efficiency improvement > The actual amount of renewable energy generating capacity operational by financial year end and an estimate for the total amount of generating capacity expected to be operational on completion of the project (in MWs). An estimate based for the expected fully built portfolio is also calculated. > The actual amount of renewable energy generated in the financial year reported as well as an estimate for the total amount of renewable energy generated over the lifetime of the asset (in MWhs). > For the purposes of standardisation and transparency, it is assumed that all clean energy generating assets have a 20-year lifetime (i.e. across all technologies) and that all energy efficiency assets have a 10-year lifetime. > The figure is calculated by multiplying installed capacity by project s capacity factor and the number of hours in a year (8760 hours). > The actual amount of energy consumption reduced in the financial year reported as well as an estimate for the total amount of energy consumption reduced over the lifetime of the asset (in MWhs). > For the purposes of standardisation and transparency, it is assumed that all clean energy generating assets have a 20-year lifetime (i.e. across all technologies) and that all energy efficiency assets have a 10-year lifetime. Eligibility Criteria GEEREF climate impact PILLAR 2: ENVIRONMENT > The percentage of investments made in GHG reduction projects (including renewable energy or energy efficiency but also others such as forestry and GHG avoidance/destruction projects) (typically 100%).

Other environment related investments Impact Criteria Total GHG emissions reduced > Additional environmental related (other than climate) investments, i.e.: the percentage of investment in cleantech companies or projects (e.g. waste treatment, clean water/air/soil, material efficiency, sustainable agriculture and recycling but not related to renewable energy or energy efficiency) (typically 0%). > The actual amount of GHG emissions reduced in the financial year reported as well as an estimate for the total GHG emissions reduced over the lifetime of the asset (in tonnes). > For the purposes of standardisation and transparency, it is assumed that all clean energy generating assets have a 20-year lifetime (ie across all technologies) and that all energy efficiency assets have a 10-year lifetime. > GEEREF uses the EIB carbon footprint methodology based upon submitted renewable energy generation figures and a standard grid emission factor per country of operation. > The figure is calculated by multiplying total energy generated by the project by country fossil fuel grid emissions factor. Total pollution reduced > The amount of pollution reduced as the result of the beneficiary projects (e.g. tonnes of water, air and waste treated, acres of recovered land, etc.). Eligibility Criteria Off-grid access Under-electrified region Least developed country Impact Criteria Beneficiary households PILLAR 3: SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT > The increase of electrification and of energy supply in communities with previously poor energy access, specifically the percentage of investments in energy generation in off-grid regions where the plant is not connected to a transmission grid. > The increase of electrification and of energy supply in communities with previously poor energy access, specifically the percentage of investments in energy generation in an under-electrified region, defined as those where less than 75 percent of the population is connected to electricity (source: IEA, World Energy Outlook 2015). > The increase of electrification and of energy supply in communities with previously poor energy access, specifically the percentage of investments in energy generation in a least developed country (LDC, as defined by OECD). > The estimated total number of beneficiary households who could potentially gain new and/or improved access to modern, renewable energy supply as the result of the project. This figure is calculated by dividing total annual electricity generation by the average annual household electricity consumption in that country (source: World Bank).

Beneficiary SMEs Permanent jobs created Temporary jobs created Permanent female jobs created Temporary female jobs created > The estimated total number of small and medium-sized businesses with fewer than 250 employees that were involved in the project (including the investee companies of the funds) through a commercial agreement with the investee project company. > Actual 2015 refers to known figures for the calendar year 2015 while Annualised refers to the expected yearly figure once the project is fully > The number of personnel hired on a full-time basis by the investee project company (this would typically include asset management services such as O&M, accounting and the like). > The number of personnel hired on a temporary basis by the investee project company (this would typically include technical services ahead of construction, construction work and the like). > The number of female personnel hired on a full-time basis by the investee project company (this would typically include asset management services such as O&M, accounting and the like). > The number of female personnel hired on a temporary basis by the investee project company (this would typically include technical services ahead of construction, construction work and the like). > Actual 2015 refers to known figures for the financial year 2015. Training provided > The number of person-hours of work-related training provided by the investee project company. Taxes paid > The total amount of local corporate tax paid at the level of the investee project company. > Actual 2015 refers to known figures for the calendar year 2015 while Annualised refers to the expected yearly figure once the project is fully

Impact Criteria Portfolio fund level Project level Eligibility Criteria GEEREF level multiplier Overall Impact PILLAR 4: FINANCIAL LEVERAGE The equity co-finance from public/private investors attracted by the investment of GEEREF after GEEREF made its commitment (excluding the previous closings where GEEREF did not participate, if applicable). GEEREF s role being to anchor teams and to play a catalytic role for other investors, the leverage at the fund level is often the ratio of the total fund size out of GEEREF commitment. Actual 2015 refers to known figures for the financial year 2015 while Lifetime refers to the expected figure once the fund has reached final close. The GEEREF Fund Multiplier is calculated by dividing the amount of total fund commitments by the amount committed to the fund by GEEREF. The equity and debt co-finance from public/private investors attracted to the project by the investment of GEEREF s portfolio funds after GEEREF s portfolio funds made its commitment. Actual 2015 refers to known figures for the financial year 2015 while Lifetime refers to the expected figure once the project has reached financial close. The GEEREF Project Multiplier is calculated by dividing the amount of total equity and debt commitments to the project by the amount committed to the fund by GEEREF. The amount of private capital attracted by the initial public sector investment into GEEREF. The GEEREF Multiplier is calculated by dividing the total commitments made to GEEREF by public/private investors by the amount committed by private sector investors. This multiplier is 2x. The total amount of funds mobilized by GEEREF funding, or total financing made available for the final beneficiaries/projects from GEEREF s investment. The GEEREF Overall Impact is calculated by multiplying the portfolio fund level leverage by project level multiplier. The figure shows the amount of funds that reach the final beneficiaries for each euro committed to GEEREF. GEEREF also calculates the GEEREF ODA Overall Impact by multiplying the GEEREF level multiplier by the portfolio fund level leverage by project level multiplier. This figure shows the amount of funds that reach the final beneficiaries for each euro of ODA funding invested in GEEREF.