presentation, which occurred on May 19, 2014 as part of the Council' s regular Budget Hearing.

Similar documents
10 cos saio COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT POLICE COST COMPARISON BETWEEN LOS GATOS AND MONTE SERENO,

$15 Minimum Wage. November 15, 2016 Item 3.4. City of San José

SANTA CLARA COUNTY CIVIL GRAND JURY REVIEW OF AUDITS AND FINANCIAL REPORTS

ANALYSIS OF POLICE SERVICES IN-HOUSE AND CONTRACT SERVICE MODELS

Yeah, the new tax bill will not be friendly to homeowners in the Bay Area, and we haven t even added in sales tax paid.

Santa Clara County Finance Agency City Meeting May 17, 2017 AGENDA

ACTIONS RELATED TO THE RECYCLE PLUS RATES FOR SINGLE-FAMILY AND MULTI-FAMILY SERVICES

SAN JOSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY

MONEY MATTERS & MORE. The Town' s Budget: Past, Present and Prospective

SANTA CLARA VALLEY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM. June 30, 2008

MEDIA RELEASE. Worse than anticipated, says Assessor Larry Stone Assessment Roll Goes Negative: First time since Great Depression

LAW ENFORCEMENT CONTRACT

Santa Clara County Hazardous Waste Recycling & Disposal Program. Participation Report - Fiscal Year Los Gatos Milpitas

COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Finance Agency Basic Aid School Districts Meeting November 7, 2018 AGENDA

FINANCE DEPARTMENT FOLLOW UP QUESTIONS FROM5, SPECIAL MEETING THE TOWN' S BUDGET: PAST, PRESENT AND PROSPECTIVE

LOS GATOS-SARATOGA JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2016

FY12/13 Budget Outlook. Riverside County Sheriff s Department

CITY OF HUGHSON SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7018 Pine Street, Hughson, CA

COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Finance Agency Basic Aid School Districts Meeting November 1, 2013 AGENDA

Special Study: Saratoga Fire Protection District

Neelima Palacherla, Executive Officer SUBJECT: PROPOSED LAFCO BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2018

MONTE SERENO BETTER STREETS COMMISSION AGENDA 7:00 P.M. Thursday March 8, 2018 Regular Meeting

RECOGNIZED OBLIGATION PAYMENT SCHEDULE - CONSOLIDATED FILED FOR THE Jan 1, 2012 to June 30, 2012 PERIOD

Minimum Wage Regional Recommendation June 9, 2016

Budget Initial Public Forum FY Town of Chapel Hill 405 Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd.

MONTE SERENO CITY COUNCIL GOALS FOR 2017 Adopted 2/7/2017

LAW ENFORCEMENT CONTRACT

Budget Action Yes: No: X Finance Review: ITEM TYPE: CONSENT PUBLIC HEARING EXISTING BUSINESS NEW BUSINESS_ X

COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT LONG RANGE CAPITAL FUNDING OPTIONS:

MEETING DATE: 3/06/2018 ITEM NO: 07 TOWN OF LOS GATOS COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT DATE: FEBRUARY 21, 2017 MAYOR AND TOWN COUNCIL

Energy Risk Management Policy

1898-W Rule No. 15 Main Extensions (Continued) 993-W 1899-W Table of Contents (Continued) 1780-W 1900-W Table of Contents 1897-W

SUBJECT: SEE BELOW DATE: April 13, 2017 ANNUAL PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE STATUS REPORT & FUNDING STRATEGY UPDATE.

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

CITIES MUST REIN IN UNSUSTAINABLE EMPLOYEE COSTS

SANTA CLARA COUNTY CIVIL GRAND JURY EXAMINATION OF AUDITS AND FINANCIAL REPORTS

San Jose Water Company

MEETING SUMMARY JUNE 14, 2018 LEGISLATIVE ACTION COMMITTEE SUMMARY

MEMORANDUM. Honorable Jamie Jacobs-May, Presiding Judge, Santa Clara County Superior Court

CAMPBELL UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2016

CITY OF DANA POINT AGENDA REPORT

CITY OF ALBANY CITY COUNCIL AGENDA STAFF REPORT

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL FOR. Full Cost Allocation Plan and Citywide User Fee Study

BUDGET PRESENTATION FY Budget Presentation. Galen L. Carroll Chief of Police. May 16, 2016

PRINCE GEORGE S COUNTY FINANCIAL OVERVIEW

Status of City Council Goals for 2017 As of 3/29/2018

1989LITTLE ORCHARD. Industrial Facility. ±158,200 s.f. state-of-the-art FOR SALE OR LEASE OVERVIEW. ±158,200 square feet

WEST VALLEY SANITATION DISTRICT

Franchisors of Marin Sanitary Service

Santa Clara County Cal ID Program Annual Report

Buffalo Fiscal Stability Authority Summary of the City of Buffalo s 2018 First Quarter Report

Budget Initial Public Forum FY16-17 February 22, Town of Chapel Hill 405 Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd.

The City of Santa Clara received the Santa Clara County Civil Grand Jury Report, Cities Must Rein In Unsustainable Employee Costs.

CITY OF DANA POINT AGENDA REPORT SUBJECT: ORANGE COUNTY SHERIFF S DEPARTMENT CONTRACT FOR FY19

San Francisco Police Department. FY Budget

Budget Stabilization Plan Summary of Observations and Recommendations

Agreement April 24, 2012

Consideration of the Controller s Report on the Proposed Fiscal Year Budget.

Fiscal Year. Controller Treasurer Department. Property Tax Highlights

FY 2018/19 BUDGET WORKSHOP

Successor Agency Contact Information. 110 E. Main Street, Los Gatos Contact Phone Number: Contact Address:

SANTA CLARA COUNTY CIVIL GRAND JURY INQUIRY INTO THE MISUSE OF DISTRICT-ISSUED CREDIT CARDS IN THE EAST SIDE UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT

Presentation on the JPA Feasibility Study RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA APRIL 2017

CITY OF SARATOGA FRUITV ALE A VENUE SARATOGA, CALIFORNIA (408)

AGENDA REPORT SUMMARY. Fiscal Year Operating Budget and Fiscal Year Capital Improvement Plan

STRAPPED CITIES THAT HIRED THE SHERIFF IS IT WORKING? Summary Background Methodology Discussion Findings Recommendations Responses

City Manager's Office

Oakland County Budget Symposium II. David Hieber ~ Oakland County

CITY OF SAN MATEO. Administrative Report

LEVEL OF SERVICE / COST & REVENUE ASSUMPTIONS

Review of Marin Sanitary Service s 2018 Rate Application

First Public Budget Hearing September 12, 2012

The 2016 General Election and Transportation Investment Ballot Measures

AGENDA ITEM K-2 Human Resources

Orange County Ground Emergency Ambulance Services

San Francisco's Experience With Business Tax Reform. Ted Egan, Ph.D. Chief Economist City and County of San Francisco

MINUTES OF THE TOWN COUNCIL/PARKING AUTHORITY STUDY SESSION JUNE 4, 2012

Franklin County FY 2016 Recommended Budget

City of Palo Alto Unfunded Pension Liability and General Fund Finances

Proposed Public Safety Levy. City of Billings

Project Progress Audit Report

Municipalities are facing a decline in revenues and increases in expenditures

Financial Statements For Ten Months Ended April 2014 (Unaudited)

J. Perry Harris, District 2 Paul Embler, Planning Director

Town of Hanover Review of 5-Year Projections and FY2019 (July 1, 2018-June 30, 2019) Budget Prelim Discussion

Before analysing the problem of public debt of State Governments in

SAN JOSH CAPITAL OP SILICON VALLEY F/ZZ/IL. Memorandum. FROM: Kim Walesh Julia H. Cooper TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL

Commissioner Tony Ortiz and Commissioner Patty Sheehan arrived at the meeting.

201 N. Civic Drive, Suite 230 City of Monte Sereno MEETING AGENDA

LONG-TERM DEBT SUMMARY

FY Budget Overview. June 6, 2017

IMarch City Council Meetin~

SANTA CLARA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT TRANSPARENCY COMPLIANCE AUDIT AND BENCHMARKING REVIEW FINAL REPORT. November 2014

The U.S. and California A Bifurcated Recovery

NAPOLEON TOWNSHIP CITIZENS POLICE ADVISORY COMMITTEE

Professional Firefighters of Greensboro Compensation Study Findings and Recommendations

Financial Statements For Seven Months Ended January 2014 (Unaudited)

MINIMUM WAGE INCREASE GUIDE

Review of Membership Developments

FY Property Taxes: An Introduction and Overview. Town Council Meeting. April 4, 2018

Transcription:

Attachment 4 with Exhibit A & B Los Gatos Monte Sereno POLICE DEPARTMENT 5 ke DATE. 211012015 TO: Town Manager Greg Larson FROM. ChiefMatt Frisby SUBJECT. Police Outsourcing Cost Comparisons Background: Town Council and staff have received numerous inquiries in recent weeks regarding the potential outsourcing oflos Gatos police services to the Santa Clara County Sheriff. This issue was previously raised at the Town Council' s Strategic Goals Retreat a year ago on February 10, 2014. At that time, the Council did not direct any consideration of outsourcing of Police services and staff ceased work on the issue. Instead, the Council directed the Police Department to be the first department to provide an in -depth budget presentation, which occurred on May 19, 2014 as part of the Council' s regular Budget Hearing. In October 2014 Council directed staffto prepare a report comparing law enforcement costs between Los Gatos and Monte Sereno and the potential impacts of terminating the Monte Sereno police services agreement. As part of that research and analysis, staffobtained and reviewed the law enforcement services agreements for Cupertino and Saratoga with the Santa Clara County Sheriff. On ednesday, the Mayor asked that the potential outsourcing of police services be added to the Council' s agenda item regarding the Monte Sereno Police Services agreement. Consequently, staff is providing the readily available information from existing contracts with the County Sheriff. Given ongoing Police operations and other Council priorities, fiuther staffwork regarding outsourcing ofpolice services will require Council direction to reverse the Council' s action a year ago. Discussion: The County Sheriff charges the exact same hourly rates for various types of law enforcement services to the cities of Saratoga and Cupertino, as summarized in Attachment 1 ( Town -Sheriff Law Enforcement Cost Comparisons) and detailed in Attachment 2 ( comparative hourly rates on pages A39 and A40 of the Los Altos Contract). Applying the Sheriff' s same hourly rates for the current hours of police services in Los Gatos results in sworn staffing costs that are nearly $ 1 million greater for the Sheriff ($10.8M vs. $9.9M, see the middle shaded line on Attachment 1 under Los Gatos). Attachment 1 is a comparison of the Saratoga and Cupertino law ATTACHMENT

enforcement budgets and hours of service with the Town of Los Gatos under the Town' s Police Department or if hypothetically outsourced to the County Sheriff. Adding in other Town Police expenses ( dispatch, records, parking, administration, etc.) and deducting the revenue received by the Police department (Monte Sereno agreement, Federal and State grants, citation revenues, etc.) results in a net cost savings of only $350,000 by outsourcing to the County Sheriff ($10. 8M vs. 11. 2M, see the lower shaded line on Attachment 1 under Los Gatos). Not included in this analysis are any transition or labor costs that may be incurred by outsourcing Town police services. The far lower law enforcement costs for Cupertino and Saratoga are achieved because those cities receive far fewer hours of law enforcement services, as per their contracts with the County Sheriff. Saratoga receives 27, 000 hours of service per year from the County Sheriff and pays 4. 6 million, both 40% of the comparable numbers for Los Gatos. Cupertino receives 59, 000 hours of service and pays $ 9. 5 million, both 12% lower than Los Gatos ( see the lower shaded lines on Attachment 1 under Saratoga and Cupertino) Consequently, it appears that there are no inherent savings achieved through outsourcing to the County Sheriff. Rather, any savings are solely due to the reduced hours of law enforcement services provided in those communities. This makes logical sense given that law enforcement cost factors ( labor, benefits, vehicles, equipment, etc) are typically uniform across a geographic region. Further, if fewer hours of police patrol and other services are desired, then the same savings can likely be achieved whether the law enforcement services are provided by the Town itself or by the County Sheriff. Conclusion: Staff would not recommend any further consideration of outsourcing given the minimal cost savings that could likely be achieved and the negative impacts that repeated consideration of outsourcing has had on Police morale, recruitment and management workloads. But if the Town Council does want to further consider outsourcing some or all Police services, then it would be appropriate to identify and budget available funds at the Mid -Year or the annual Budget to engage a professional consultant who has done Police consolidation studies. If the Council simply wants to reduce Police hours of service and corresponding Police costs, then direction can be provided for inclusion in the upcoming proposed budget. However, staff does not recommend a reduction in current Police staffing given current activity levels and desired Police response and associated services. Exhibits: A. Town -Sheriff Law Enforcement Cost Comparisons B. Comparative hourly rates on pages A39 and A40 of the Los Altos Contract

L X C C o d V C G Ol o' Q - r Ol Y N C t m L m vy1 O. ou p p v M030 C_ N O E a' O N ' O y J V V a U i U to U 3 77 7 a\ M T V O In Cr, Q` 00 N OO OO M V C C ) v1 IT C V7 7 0 00 00 M N V) N O N N C M C\ r- NN kn M C, c 7O ti C) O c C IT c O o O O NC, N O00 c o0 Mr- Vi o 00 N CN 01 c c M h C OC 1-0 DD N O kn N kn Q O O O E D1 r 0 z Z C:) O M M m Z Z rz Z Z Z m M 00 h O O O O D I.m O z z Z Z O Z Z Z Z Z Z r- O N n r CD Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q 00 00 Z z Z z Ol V' 1 O t Z Z Z M Z H O c 7 C, 00 C m 7 7 00 N O O M V C Z Z Z Z Z Z Z 00 Z Rn 7 00 ON 4: IV IV o R R kn CA L Q Q Q Q CT IT N oo R O Vl N Q Q Q Q Q 00 kn z yz Z Z O O Z Z z z z N Q 00 00 00 M 7 7 kn I L O O 7 O O\ kn N e C Z Z z Z O 7 N p xi N N N N 7 M r Z z Z z z Q Q Q Q C) 7 0 N Q Q Q Q Q Q N zzz z D D Ln sa M 7 zzzzzz LJO rcc ar V] R y bl L U y pp k p L xi aa; O wah az aza.1 z n

EXHIBIT A PROPOSED COSTS FISCAL YEAR 2014-2015 LOS ALTOS UNINCORP. RATES CUPERTINO HILLS SARATOGA CITIES GENERAL LA ENFORCEMENT Proposed Hours - Activity Proposed Hours - Patrol Total Hours 38, 248. 0 5, 421. 0 20, 060.0 14, 696. 0 Proj Costs FY 2014-2015 @ $ 164. 90 $ 6, 307, 095 $ 893, 923 $ 3, 307, 894 $ 2, 423, 370 TRAFFIC ENFORCEMENT- DAYS: Proposed Hours 7, 200.0 43. 0 4, 195. 4 0. 0 Proj Costs FY 2014-2015 @ $ 162.43 $ 6, 984 $ 681,451 $ 0 Cupertino @ $ 162. 45 $ 1, 169, 640 TRAFFIC ENFORCEMENT- NIGHTS: Proposed Hours 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 11 Proj Costs FY 2014-2015 @ $ 166.04 $ 0 $ 0 0 Cupertino @ $ 166. 06 $ 0 INVESTIGATIVE HOURS: Proposed Hours 7, 200.0 600. 0 2, 400. 0 0. 0 Proj Costs FY 2014-2015 @ $ 159.02 $ 1, 144, 944 $ 95, 412 $ 381, 648 $ 0 FY15 Contract Cities Proposed Costs 05-15 -2014 A - 39 DSA =O%

EXHIBIT A PROPOSED COSTS FISCAL YEAR 2014-2015 LOS ALTOS UNINCORP. RATES CUPERTINO HILLS SARATOGA CITIES RESERVES ACTIVITY HOURS: Proposed Hours 1, 650. 0 22. 0 340.0 11r Proj Costs FY 2014-2015 @ $ 48. 70 80, 355 $ 1, 071 $ 16,558 $ 0 OPERATING COSTS OF EST VALLEY SUBSTATION: Proj Hours FY 2014-2015 45, 448 5, 464 24, 255 14, 696 89, 863 Percentage 50.5748% 6. 0804% 26. 9911% 16.3538% Proj Costs July 2014 - Oct 2014 @ $ 418, 614 yr 70,571 8, 484 37, 663 22, 820 Proj Costs Nov 2014 - Jun 2015 @ $ 418, 614 yr 141, 142 16, 969 75, 326 45, 639 Total Proj Costs of Substation = $ 418, 614 211, 713 25, 453 112, 989 68,459 SUBTOTAL COSTS: Proj Costs FY 2014-2015 8, 913, 747 $ 1, 022, 843 $ 4, 500,540 $ 2, 491, 829 PROJECTED SPECIAL SERVICES Projected Hours FY 2014-2015 1, 815. 5 0 0 0 Cupertino Traffic Sergeant 189, 351 0 0 0 Saratoga School Resource Officer 0 0 100, 000 0 SCHOOLS RESOURCE OFFICER Proj Costs FY 2014-2015 @ $ 136.23 395, 721 0 0 0 1 SRO @ 85% and 1 SRO @ 75 %) TOTAL SHERIFF LA ENFORCEMENT COSTS Projected Costs FY 2014-2015 9, 498, 819 $ 1, 022, 843 $ 4, 600, 540 $ 2, 491, 829 CAPPED COSTS 2014-2015 Proj Costs Capped @ 4. 6% ( CPI +2 %) Increase AMOUNTS BELO CAP OF 4. 6% 9, 840, 602 $ 1, 060, 170 $ 4, 753, 605 $ 0 341, 783) ($ 37, 327) ($ 153, 065) $ 0 FY15 Contract Cities_ Proposed Costs 05-15 -2014 A - 40 DSA =O%