EXTENDING COVERAGE IN THE GERMAN PENSION SYSTEM

Similar documents
International Seminar on Priority Challenges in Pension Administration. Tokyo, Japan, January Berlin and Tokyo

Pension projections Denmark (AWG)

Pensions: Basic Concepts and international debate. Bogor, Indonesia 6 March 2017

The Japanese Journal of Social Security Policy, Vol.6, No.1

1. Overview of the pension system

Documentation of Indicators

REPUBLIC OF CROATIA MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND PENSION SYSTEM Croatian Pension Insurance Institute. Croatia Country fiche on pension projections

Pension schemes in EU member states, For more information on this topic please click here

Sustainability and Adequacy of Social Security in the Next Quarter Century:

International social security standards and challenges to social security

3 The Pension System and Public Assistance

SELECTED MAJOR SOCIAL SECURITY PENSION REFORMS IN EUROPE, Source: ISSA Databases

Croatia Country fiche on pension projections

Professional integrated welfare and sectorial welfare, pension systems.

46th General Report. on the Implementation of the European Code of Social Security as amended by its Protocol (Article 74)

I. Identifying information. Contribution ID: 061f8185-8f02-4c02-b a7d06d30f Date: 15/01/ :05:48. * Name:

POLAND 1 MAIN CHARACTERISTICS OF THE PENSIONS SYSTEM

Social security financing

Latvian Country Fiche on Pension Projections

The Canadian Pension System

Pensions, Economic Growth and Welfare in Advanced Economies

Reforming Public Service Pensions

Sri Lanka s Experience with Informal Sector Contributory Pension Schemes

AUSTRIA 1 MAIN CHARACTERISTICS OF THE PENSIONS SYSTEM

Backgrounder: Strategy for income security

Canada Pension Plan: Journey from 1997 to 2016

The Canadian Pension System. Edward Tamagno Policy Associate Caledon Institute of Social Policy Ottawa, Canada

Pension policy and financial assessment of a new defined benefit pension scheme

The pension system derailed: Proposals how to get back on the reform track

HUNGARY 1 MAIN CHARACTERISTICS OF THE PENSIONS SYSTEM

Legislation Sozialgesetzbuch (SGB). December Jugendarbeitsschutzgesetz. Youth Labour Protection Laws

Economic Policy Committee s Ageing Working Group

Sri Lanka s Schemes for Informal Sector Workers

MALTA 1 MAIN CHARACTERISTICS OF THE PENSIONS SYSTEM

THE PUBLIC PENSION SYSTEM COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN ROMANIA AND GERMANY

SUBMISSION TO THE DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL AND FAMILY AFFAIRS

The demographic impact on the German pension system and reform options

Pension reform in Germany and key supervisory challenges

AGE Platform Europe contribution to the Draft Report on an Adequate, Safe and Sustainable pensions (2012/2234(INI)) Rapporteur: Ria OOMEN-RUIJTEN

Social security and retirement reform a progress report

IOPS COUNTRY PROFILE: ROMANIA

year thus receiving public pension benefits for the first time. See Verband Deutscher Rentenversicherungsträger

IOPS Member country or territory pension system profile: ARMENIA. Report issued on April 2012, validated by the Central Bank of Armenia

IOPS Member country or territory pension system profile: ALBANIA

Level (10 6 euros) rate of change. rate of change

Staying the Course? Inter-generational Implications of Budget Repair

Recent development of the Bulgarian pension system

EXCLUSION. Reduce the number of long-term unemployed by 320,000 by 2020, measured against the annual average in 2008.

Winfried Schmähl. A new chapter in German Pension Policy: The 2001 Pension Reform based on a Paradigm Shift 1

Using registers in BE- SILC to construct income variables. Eurostat Grant: Action plan for EU-SILC improvements

PORTUGAL 1 MAIN CHARACTERISTICS OF THE PENSIONS SYSTEM

COMPARED REGULATIONS SERIES. Membership of Self-Employed Workers in Individually Funded Programs

[11] Pension Security

Pension Diagnostic Assessment Pensions Core Course April 27, Mark C. Dorfman Pensions Team SPL Global Practice The World Bank

European Interim Agreement on Social Security Schemes relating to Old Age, Invalidity and Survivors

Lithuanian country fiche on pension projections 2015

Information Sheet for Performing the Federal Volunteer Service

EXCLUSION. Reduce the number of long-term unemployed by 320,000 by 2020, measured against the annual average in 2008.

Japan s Public Pension: The Great Vulnerability to Deflation

TOWARDS SUSTAINABLE AND FAIR PENSIONS

Case Studies: Managing Your Benefits Globally. Edward Cha, VP Global Benefits Practice Leader

Submission to House of Commons Standing Committee on Finance Pre-Budget Consultation Giving Priority to Low-Income, Unattached, Women Seniors

Pension Reform in Germany

Re : UN Questionnaire on income security for older persons from a human rights perspective

Pension Projections Exercise 2014

REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA. Country fiche on pension projections

Unemployment and Pensions Protection in Europe: the Changing Role of Social Partners

REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA. Country fiche on pension projections

Online Appendix from Bönke, Corneo and Lüthen Lifetime Earnings Inequality in Germany

Global Legislative Developments

Country Panel Presentation: Germany

TOWARDS SUSTAINABLE AND FAIR PENSIONS

The Danish labour market System 1. European Commissions report 2002 on Denmark

EUROPEAN PILLAR OF SOCIAL RIGHTS. #SocialRights THE FUTURE OF WORK AND THE EUROPEAN PILLAR OF SOCIAL RIGHTS. #SocialRights.

PUBLIC PENSION SYSTEMS AND THE ELDERLY POVERTY IN KOREA

The role of public pensions and reform options

Executive Summary Overall framework description

Submission on Automatic Enrolment Retirement Savings System. Strawman Consultation November 2018

The German Fiscal Sustainability Report - Rationale, Methodology, Long-term Policy

In cooperation with Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development

Economic Policy Committee s Ageing Working Group. Belgium: Country Fiche 2014 REP_COUNTRYFICH2014_ Federal Planning Bureau

ACTUARIAL REPORT 25 th. on the

Pension Reform in Japan at the Turn of the Century. Noriyuki Takayama 1. Changes in the social security pension system have thus far been made

pension rights in Germany church sector

The Effect of Pension Subsidies on Retirement Timing of Older Women: Evidence from a Regression Kink Design

TRAINING COURSE ON SOCIAL PROTECTION & FORMALIZATION TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO MARCH 15, 2017 INTRODUCTION

IOPS Member country or territory pension system profile: PANAMA

Expanding Coverage of the National Pension in Korea:

Report of the German Social Advisory Council on the. Federal Government s 2006 Pension Insurance Report

International Pension Systems. Germany. Australia. Sweden

ESPN Synthesis Report Access to social protection for people working on non-standard contracts and as self-employed in Europe.

TERMS OF REFERENCE. Technical Working Group on the extension of social security to the informal economy

Status of Social Protection of Elderly in Sri Lanka

Pension Reform Options in Korea

STRUCTURAL REFORM REFORMING THE PENSION SYSTEM IN KOREA. Table 1: Speed of Aging in Selected OECD Countries. by Randall S. Jones

IOPS COUNTRY PROFILE: BRAZIL

GERMANY. Expenditure refers to Western Germany up to and through 1990, and to the unified Germany from 1991 onwards.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS OF THE SPECIAL COMMISSION TO STUDY THE MASSACHUSETTS CONTRIBUTORY RETIREMENT SYSTEMS SUBMITTED OCTOBER 7, 2009

2005 National Strategy Report on Adequate and Sustainable Pensions; Estonia

Social Participation. Employment, Voluntary Work and Education. Introduction

Transcription:

EXTENDING COVERAGE IN THE GERMAN PENSION SYSTEM Social Security Development Unit Research, Development, Statistics Department German Pension Insurance Federal Institute Berlin, Germany

Organized by: MINISTRY OF HEALTH, LABOUR AND WELFARE OF JAPAN, THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIAL SECURITY ORGANISATION (ISSA), THE PROJECT ON INTERGENERATIONAL EQUITY OF THE HITOTSUBASHI UNIVERSITY, TOKYO, JAPAN International Seminar on Priority Challenges in Pension Administration January 20-22, 2010 Mita-Kaigisho Tokyo, Japan

The German Pension System Multi Pillar System Focus on gainful occupation Coverage: Stratification along occupations and professions, at least in the first pillar Employees: Workers, salaried employees, miners: Civil servants: special scheme Self employed: different schemes Farmers: Special scheme Chambered professions: special schemes Craftspeople Funding: Pay-as-you go: first pillar (mostly); Full funding: second and third pillar (mostly) 3

The German Pension System: Coverage Third Pillar Secon d Pillar Private Pension Insurance Occupational Pensions First Pillar Statutory Pension Insurance Farmers Pension Provision Insurance of Craftspeople Insurance of Artists and Publicists Insurance of Vulnerable Groups of Self Employed Voluntary Insurance Miners Employees Chambered Professions Civil Servants Zero Pillar Means tested Income Maintenance atsubsistence Level 4

The German Pension System: Funding Full funding: green, PAYG: yellow Third Pillar Secon d Pillar Private Pension Insurance Occupational Pensions First Pillar Statutory Pension Insurance Farmers Pension Provision Insurance of Craftspeople Insurance of Artists and Publicists Insurance of Vulnerable Groups of Self Employed Voluntary Insurance Miners Employees Chambered Professions Civil Servants Zero Pillar Means tested Income Maintenance atsubsistence Level 5

Coverage of Self Employed Chambered Professions Farmers Craftspeople Artists and publicists Vulnerable Occupations: in need of social protection Other self employed 6

Mandatory Coverage of Self Employed Group of Self- Employed Mandate Schemes Distribution % Chambered Professions Mandatory Professional Pension Schemes of the Liberal Professions 8.0 Farmers Mandatory Farmers Pension Scheme 7.2 Craftspeople Artists and Publicists Mandatory for 18 years Mandatory Statutory Pension Insurance 6.3 Vulnerable Occupations Other self employed Mandatory No Mandatory Pension Insurance NONE 78 7

Vulnerable Occupations In need of social protections No assets emerging from occupation No permanent customers 8

Changes in the Labour Market / Work life 1. More self-employed 2. More precarious employment 3. More fluctuations, frictions and breaks 9

Changes in the Labour Market / Work life TYPE OF EMPLOYMENT 1993 2008 In percent of total employment Self employed 9.66 11.09 Employees 90.34 88.91 Employees liable for social insurance 76.17 68.20 Employees liable for social insurance and in full time employment Employees liable for social insurance and in part time employment 67.80 55.74 8.37 12.43 Employees in atypical employment 9.93 20.92 Total employment 100.0 100.0 10

Changes in the Labour Market / Work life TYPE OF EMPLOYMENT 1993 2008 Thousand persons Self employed 3 625 4 465 Employees 33 916 35 798 Employees liable for social insurance 28 596 27 458 Employees liable for social insurance and in full time employment Employees liable for social insurance and in part time employment 25 454 22 443 3 142 5 003 Employees in atypical employment 3 034 8 425 Total employment 37 541 40 263 11

Changes in the Labour Market / Work life Uncovered Self Employment Number of periods of self employment Average Duration of Self-Employment Spell (years) Accumulated Duration of Self- Employment Spell (years) Chambered 3.2 11.3 27.2 Other 2.3 10.5 17.8 Without mandatory coverage 1.8 7.2 11.2 12

Changes in the Labour Market / Work life: Younger age cohorts are more often self employed Age Cohort 1942-1946 1947-1951 1952-1956 1957-1961 Total No periods of self employment 89.1 87.2 85.0 83.5 85.9 Some periods of self employment Chambered professions 1.1 0.8 0.9 1.4 1.0 Other 3.2 3.6 4.2 3.6 3.7 Without mandatory coverage 6.7 8.4 10.0 11.6 9.4 Total 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 13

Distribution of Net Income in Germany of Groups of Employed Civil Servants Workers and Employees Selfemployed Net income classes from to below Euro of Self-Employed Self-employed without employees Self-employed with employees 14 Source: Sachverständigenrat Net income classes from to below Euro

Conclusions so far There is a significant coverage gap in the German pension insurance Gross income replacement rate after 45 years (constant gross earnings in relation to average gross income): 45.9 percent Gross income replacement rate per contributory year: 1.02 Longer spells of uncovered self-employment increase the risk of old age poverty for the INDIVIDUAL Longer spells of uncovered self-employment increase the risk of granting transfer payments from the general budget for the COMMUNITY Impose mandate for pension coverage on selfemployed 15

Proposal: Mandatory Insurance for Self-Employed Mandatory insurance for ALL self-employed in the Statutory Pension Insurance if not mandatory members in any other scheme (e.g. farmers, chambered professions) 16

Principles Mandatory insurance for ALL self-employed in the Statutory Pension Insurance if not a mandatory members in any other scheme (e.g. farmers, chambered professions Opting out for older self employed and those who already made pension provisions at least similar those of the statutory pension insurance: disability, old age, survivors Equal treatment of dependent and self employed insured Provisions for the specifics of self employed occupation Option: Crafts privilege after 18 contributory years opting out could be possible, eventually restricted to particular groups of selfemployed. 17

Technical Issues for Implementation of Employee Insurance Transitional provisions Design to account for special features of self-employment Contributory income, insured income Rate of contribution Burden of contribution Payment of contribution 18

Transitional Features Phasing in Transitional features Protection for reliance on existing law and protection of confidence Opting out rules for those uninsured who have already arranged adequate protection of disability, old-age and surviving dependents Opting out rules for older self employed close to retirement 19

Contributory Income, Insured Income Standard: earned income Option: Average income No other income: income replacement function of pensions Special options for start-up phase: reduced statutory contribution 20

Rate of Contribution, Payment of Contributions, Burden of Contribution Rate of Contribution: Principle: Strong relation between size of pension and contributions made No deviations or differentiation of contribution rates Payment: Income of self-employed is more volatile than income of dependent employees. Falling due of contribution payments should be more flexible in order to allow flexible liquidity management. Burden: No special subsidies should be foreseen to support pension contribution payment of self employed. 21

Financial and Distributional Implications 1. Short-term perspectives More contributors; with expenditure path unchanged equilibrium rate of contribution could be lower. After the end of the transitional period: more pension rights must be honoured and the equilibrium rate would edge up again 2. Long-term perspective depends on the differences between incumbent and additional groups of insured regarding age structure, average income, number of children, life expectancy and early retirement risk. 3. Inter- and intra-generational effects impact on implicit tax 22

Alternative Policy Options (1) 1. Mandatory coverage in statutory pension insurance (proposal) Among others: flexibility of the labour market, less distortions 2. Mandate to enrol in private scheme Advantage: Incentive compatibility: no implicit tax, risk-return ratio according to individual s preferences Problems: Failures of private insurance markets, affordability 23

Alternative Policy Options (2) 3. Mandate to enrol in statutory or private scheme according to the individual s choosing Problems : as under 2 Plus: equity considerations, adverse selection bias 4. Complete integration of first pillar schemes Many legal obstacles Many political obstacles Uncertain distributional implications Implementation too time consuming 24

Conclusions Complete inclusion of self-employed in mandatory pension coverage is a MUST in view of the structural changes of labour markets and occupations. Several policy options are on the table; given the lead time needed to build up significant pension rights, time for debate is running out. 25

どうもありがとう Thank you very much Vielen Dank Contact Deutsche Rentenversicherung Bund German Pension Insurance Federal Institute D-10704 Berlin +49 30 8 65 8 93 66 +49 1 72 3 92 35 83 markus.sailer@drv-bund.de sailer.markus@web.de