Total state and local business taxes State-by-state estimates for

Similar documents
Total state and local business taxes

Total state and local business taxes

Total state and local business taxes

Total state and local business taxes

Total state and local business taxes. State-by-state estimates for fiscal year 2011 July 2012

Total State and Local Business Taxes

Supporting innovation and economic growth. The broad impact of the R&D credit in Prepared by Ernst & Young LLP for the R&D Credit Coalition

State Individual Income Taxes: Personal Exemptions/Credits, 2011

Undocumented Immigrants are:

The Effect of the Federal Cigarette Tax Increase on State Revenue

State Corporate Income Tax Collections Decline Sharply

Annual Costs Cost of Care. Home Health Care

Union Members in New York and New Jersey 2018

Checkpoint Payroll Sources All Payroll Sources

Income from U.S. Government Obligations

Kentucky , ,349 55,446 95,337 91,006 2,427 1, ,349, ,306,236 5,176,360 2,867,000 1,462

State Income Tax Tables

Competitiveness of state and local business taxes on new investment. Ranking states by tax burden on new investment

Task Force on State and Local Taxation

Taxes and Economic Competitiveness. Dale Craymer President, Texas Taxpayers and Research Association (512)

AIG Benefit Solutions Producer Licensing and Appointment Requirements by State

Understanding Oregon s Throwback Rule for Apportioning Corporate Income

Pay Frequency and Final Pay Provisions

Sales Tax Return Filing Thresholds by State

MINIMUM WAGE WORKERS IN HAWAII 2013

Impacts of Prepayment Penalties and Balloon Loans on Foreclosure Starts, in Selected States: Supplemental Tables

Recourse for Employees Misclassified as Independent Contractors Department for Professional Employees, AFL-CIO

MEDICAID BUY-IN PROGRAMS

Motor Vehicle Sales/Use, Tax Reciprocity and Rate Chart-2005

Termination Final Pay Requirements

Chapter D State and Local Governments

USING INCOME TAXES TO ADDRESS STATE BUDGET SHORTFALLS. By Elizabeth C. McNichol

The Costs and Benefits of Half a Loaf: The Economic Effects of Recent Regulation of Debit Card Interchange Fees. Robert J. Shapiro

How Much Would a State Earned Income Tax Credit Cost in Fiscal Year 2018?

EBRI Databook on Employee Benefits Chapter 6: Employment-Based Retirement Plan Participation

Ability-to-Repay Statutes

STATE AND LOCAL TAXES A Comparison Across States

The table below reflects state minimum wages in effect for 2014, as well as future increases. State Wage Tied to Federal Minimum Wage *

WHAT A 25-CENT FEDERAL GAS TAX INCREASE WOULD LOOK LIKE IN EACH STATE

PAY STATEMENT REQUIREMENTS

Residual Income Requirements

Federal Rates and Limits

Federal Registry. NMLS Federal Registry Quarterly Report Quarter I

The 2017 CHP Salary Survey

Forecasting State and Local Government Spending: Model Re-estimation. January Equation

CRS Report for Congress

Media Alert. First American CoreLogic Releases Q3 Negative Equity Data

State Unemployment Insurance Tax Survey

State Tax Treatment of Social Security, Pension Income

Q Homeowner Confidence Survey Results. May 20, 2010

Nation s Uninsured Rate for Children Drops to Another Historic Low in 2016

TA X FACTS NORTHERN FUNDS 2O17

Fingerprint, Biographical Affidavit and Third-Party Verification Reports Requirements

DFA INVESTMENT DIMENSIONS GROUP INC. DIMENSIONAL INVESTMENT GROUP INC. Institutional Class Shares January 2018

NOTICE TO MEMBERS CANADIAN DERIVATIVES CORPORATION CANADIENNE DE. Trading by U.S. Residents

American Economics Group Clear and Effective Economic Analysis. American Economics Group

CLMS BRIEF 2 - Estimate of SUI Revenue, State-by-State

Fiscal Fact. By Kail Padgitt and Alicia Hansen

Child Care Assistance Spending and Participation in 2016

State Tax Rates and 1996 Collections

Notice on Reallotment of Workforce Investment Act (WIA) Title I Formula Allotted Funds

State Social Security Income Pension Income State computation not based on federal. Social Security benefits excluded from taxable income.

Tax Recommendations and Actions in Other States. Joel Michael House Research Department June 9, 2011

MINIMUM WAGE WORKERS IN TEXAS 2016

Q309 NATIONAL DELINQUENCY SURVEY FROM THE MORTGAGE BANKERS ASSOCIATION. Data as of September 30, 2009

SUMMARY ANALYSIS OF THE SENATE AGRICULTURE COMMITTEE NUTRITION TITLE By Dorothy Rosenbaum and Stacy Dean

MainStay Funds Income Tax Information Notice

Mapping the geography of retirement savings

State Estate Taxes BECAUSE YOU ASKED ADVANCED MARKETS

2012 RUN Powered by ADP Tax Changes

Daniel Morris, MS, PhD

American Economics Group Clear and Effective Economic Analysis. American Economics Group

Q209 NATIONAL DELINQUENCY SURVEY FROM THE MORTGAGE BANKERS ASSOCIATION. Data as of June 30, 2009

Required Training Completion Date. Asset Protection Reciprocity

Fingerprint and Biographical Affidavit Requirements

2014 STATE AND FEDERAL MINIMUM WAGES HR COMPLIANCE CENTER

DATA AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2010

STATE MINIMUM WAGES 2017 MINIMUM WAGE BY STATE

NCSL FISCAL BRIEF: PROJECTED STATE TAX GROWTH IN FY 2012 AND BEYOND

Economic Impacts of Wait Times for Commercial Driver s Licenses Skills Tests

Overview of Sales Tax Exemptions for Agricultural Producers in the United States

# of Credit Unions As of March 31, 2011

ATHENE Performance Elite Series of Fixed Index Annuities

CHAPTER 6. The Economic Contribution of Hospitals

IMPORTANT TAX INFORMATION

FAPRI Analysis of Dairy Policy Options for the 2002 Farm Bill Conference

Minimum Wage Laws in the States - April 3, 2006

The Economic Impact of Spending for Operations and Construction in 2013 by AZA-Accredited Zoos and Aquariums

State Minimum Wage Chart (See below for Local/City Minimum Wage Chart)

STATE AND FEDERAL MINIMUM WAGES

FISCAL FACT Top Marginal Effective Tax Rates By State under Rival Tax Plans from Congressional Democrats and Republicans

Fiscal Policy Project

Mutual Fund Tax Information

Number of Pass-Through Businesses Tripled While Number of Corporations Declined

Aiming. Higher. Results from a Scorecard on State Health System Performance 2015 Edition. Douglas McCarthy, David C. Radley, and Susan L.

Mutual Fund Tax Information

Metrics and Measurements for State Pension Plans. November 17, 2016 Greg Mennis

THE STATE OF THE STATES IN DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES

Virginia Has Improved The Tax Treatment of Low-Income Families, And an EITC Modeled on The Federal EITC Would Go Further.

White Paper 2018 STATE AND FEDERAL MINIMUM WAGES

Transcription:

Total state and local business taxes State-by-state estimates for

The authors Andrew Phillips is a principal in the Quantitative Economics and Statistics group of Ernst & Young LLP and directs EY s Regional Economics practice. He has an MA in Economics from Johns Hopkins University and a BA in Economics from Emory University. Robert Cline is the National Director of State and Local Tax Policy Economics of Ernst & Young LLP. Robert is the former director of tax research for the States of Michigan and Minnesota. He has a PhD in Economics from the University of Michigan. Caroline Sallee is a manager in the Quantitative Economics and Statistics group. She has a Master s degree in Public Policy from the University of Michigan. Michelle Klassen is an analyst in the Quantitative Economics and Statistics group. She has a BS in Economics from Virginia Tech. Daniel Sufranski is an analyst in the Quantitative Economics and Statistics group. He has a BA in Economics and Political Science from Washington University. This study was prepared by the Quantitative Economics and Statistics (QUEST) practice of Ernst & Young LLP in conjunction with the Council On State Taxation (COST). QUEST is a group of economists, statisticians, survey professionals and tax policy researchers within EY s National Tax Practice, located in Washington, DC. QUEST provides quantitative advisory services and products to private and public sector clients that enhance business processes, support regulatory compliance, analyze proposed policy issues and provide litigation support. committee to the Council of State Chambers of Commerce and today has an independent membership preserve and promote the equitable and nondiscriminatory state and local taxation of multijurisdictional business entities.

Executive summary This study presents detailed state-by-state estimates of the state and local taxes paid by businesses for conjunction with the Council On State Taxation (COST). impact of recovery from the recession on business productivity and property values, economic growth related to the natural resource boom and lingering effects of depleted unemployment insurance resources. The state and local business tax estimates presented These include business property taxes; sales and excise taxes paid by businesses on their input purchases; gross receipts taxes; corporate income and franchise taxes; business and corporate license taxes; unemployment insurance taxes; individual income taxes paid by owners of non-corporate (pass-through) businesses; and other state and local taxes that are the statutory liability of business taxpayers.

Property tax collections on business Property taxes paid by business totaled taxes. Sales tax on business inputs and capital and local taxes paid by businesses in of total state and local business taxes. Corporate income tax collections grew corporate income tax rate and Michigan s switch from a combination income and gross receipts tax on business to a new corporate income tax. total state and local business taxes, On average, business taxes make up product (GSP) in a state. Private-sector GSP measures the total value of a state s annual production of goods and services by the private sector. The ratio of business taxes to private-sector GSP When comparing the taxes businesses pay to the estimated value of the for each dollar of estimated government services they receive, if educational spending is assumed to not directly of educational spending is assumed to received by business. When half of

Total state and local business 2 This section describes the business taxes in more detail and highlights the key results. on real, personal and utility property owned by businesses account for the largest share of total state Sales and use taxes paid by businesses on purchases consumers are excluded; only the taxes paid on businesses operating inputs and capital equipment purchases are included in the total business tax estimates. State and local corporate income tax collections temporary corporate income surcharge and doubled Employer contributions to unemployment insurance increase in total state and local business taxes in States have increased unemployment insurance taxes to restore unemployment trust fund balances depleted during the recession and repay federal Federal Unemployment Account totaled more than These large debts are due to the combination of underfunding during the last economic expansion and the severity of unemployment during the latest recession. Business tax % total taxes One-year change Property taxes on business property General sales taxes on business inputs Corporate income tax Unemployment insurance Business and corporate license Excise taxes Public utility taxes Severance taxes Other business taxes Total state and local business taxes may not sum due to rounding. estimates are revised from the COST newly released data from the U.S. Census Bureau. See Appendix for more information. based on data from the U.S. Census Bureau, State and Local Government Finances. Total state and local business taxes 3

Excise taxes paid by business were an estimated business include a portion of motor fuel taxes and other excise taxes, such as taxes on hotel and rental car expenditures by business, as well as health care provider taxes on the revenue of hospitals and other providers of health services. Taxes on insurance premiums paid by business totaled gross receipts, and because they are often levied in lieu of property or corporate income taxes, they are allocated solely to business. vehicle license taxes. business taxes. Four states (Alaska, Texas, North in severance taxes. pass-through entities (e.g., partnerships, sole proprietorships, limited liability companies and collections of individual income taxes on pass-through 11.0% 5.3% 7.5% 7.6% 12.3% 35.3% Taxes on business property Sales tax on business inputs Excise, utility and insurance taxes Corporate income tax Unemployment insurance tax Individual income tax on business income Business license, severance and other business taxes 21.2% 4

taxes as those that are the legal liability of businesses. Certain taxes collected by business, such as excise taxes on tobacco and alcohol and sales taxes on household individual income tax on pass through business income is included as a legal tax liability of business owners. The business Property taxes paid by business on real and personal property. Taxes on incomegenerating, residential rental property are treated as business taxes. General sales taxes paid by businesses on purchases of goods and services used paid by consumers are not included. While corporate income taxes remain the most common business entity tax levied by states, within the last decade two states, Ohio and Texas, have adopted non-income business entity taxes based on a pure or states, Washington and New Hampshire, have levied a gross receipts and valueadded tax, respectively, for many years, and an increasing number of states levy minimum taxes based on gross receipts. Michigan s short-lived Michigan Business Tax had a gross receipts component, but this tax was eliminated in favor of a corporate income tax that went into lowered business taxes on non-c-corporate businesses with business tax collections As shown in Table 2, taxes levied on a corporate income, corporate license or sales tax in this study consistent with the of these taxes were combined into a single gross-receipts-based business tax category, table are minimum taxes based on gross receipts levied as part of state corporate income tax systems. For example, Oregon gross receipts. For taxpayers subject to these taxes, the minimum taxes function as gross receipts taxes but are generally included in the corporate income tax statistics. A portion of excise taxes, such as business share of motor fuel taxes. Corporate income taxes. Taxes on insurance premiums and utility gross receipts, which are in some cases levied in lieu of other business entity taxes. business income. Taxes withheld on employee earnings are not considered business taxes. Unemployment insurance tax paid by employers. Business licenses, including general occupational licenses and commercial motor vehicle licenses. Severance taxes on mining, natural gas, oil and other natural resources. Business tax Business Tax Business Enterprise Tax Activity Tax Tax and Operation Tax taxes Corporate income tax/ general sales and gross receipts tax* One-year change Corporate income tax Corporate license tax Corporate license tax Sales tax Total state and local business taxes 5

State versus local business tax revenues grew with state revenue outpacing local dollar amounts, percentage distributions and growth local levels of government. moderate growth in corporate income, general sales taxes on business inputs and business license taxes coupled with strong growth in other taxes such as severance, unemployment insurance and pass-through business income taxes generated strong revenue gains at the state level. Local business tax collections grew revenue category, property taxes on business property. The modest gain in local taxes was due to strong growth the overall growth of local business taxes. At the state level, all types of business taxes increased and business property taxes, resulting in overall state business taxes was driven by strong growth in three tax To put this increase in revenue in perspective, state business taxes grew by an average annual compounded in the composition of state and local business taxes. for local business taxes. While sales taxes on business inputs account for a large share of total business taxes 6

Business tax State business State business % total state business taxes state business taxes General sales and use tax on inputs Unemployment insurance Corporate net income Excise taxes on business inputs Business license tax Severance taxes Public utility tax Property tax on business property Other business taxes Total state business taxes Business tax % total local business taxes local business taxes Property taxes on business property General sales taxes on business inputs Public utility taxes Excise taxes on business inputs 5.2 Other business taxes Total local business taxes

State-by-state business tax collections Figure 2 shows the state-by-state change in total state and local business taxes between changes. Several states reported severance taxes as the main source of growth in business tax revenue. North Dakota s revenue from Corporate income tax collections and Connecticut increased tax rates and its individual income tax rate from extended a temporary corporate income tax surcharge on larger businesses Connecticut also increased marginal individual income tax rates and the number of brackets. The top marginal corporate tax rate in Connecticut states reduced taxes on business income Michigan Business Tax and replaced it reducing business tax collections by on gross receipts across all industries Jersey adopted single sales factor apportionment, which reduced its corporate income tax collections in the overall growth in state and local Unemployment insurance tax collections Unemployment taxes in Hawaii grew by doubled. Growth in business sales tax collections was tempered by the expiration of temporary tax increases enacted during the recession. California allowed its temporary sales tax rate increase to point increase in the sales tax rate and a temporary income tax surcharge expired. by tax type and state. The results show that states vary widely in the composition of their business tax structures, producing implications for revenue growth and presents the percentage composition by District of Columbia.

(Percentage change in total state and local business taxes) North Dakota, 48.7% Alaska, 25.8% Oklahoma, 14.0% Hawaii, 11.5% Connecticut, 10.3% Texas, 9.2% Colorado, 9.0% Minnesota, 8.8% Iowa, 8.2% Oregon, 8.1% Dist. Columbia, 7.9% South Dakota, 7.6% Maryland, 7.5% Utah, 7.5% Illinois, 7.1% Mississippi, 6.9% Indiana, 6.7% Tennessee, 6.4% Montana, 6.2% Nevada, 6.1% South Carolina, 5.9% Alabama, 4.9% Ohio, 4.9% New Mexico, 4.9% Kansas, 4.8% Arkansas, 4.8% Idaho, 4.3% Arizona, 3.8% Kentucky, 3.7% Nebraska, 3.4% Wyoming, 3.4% Louisiana, 3.2% Vermont, 3.2% Pennsylvania, 3.2% Massachusetts, 3.0% Missouri, 2.9% Georgia, 2.7% New York, 2.5% Virginia, 2.4% Florida, 2.2% Maine, 2.2% Michigan, 2.1% Washington, 2.0% West Virginia, 1.8% Wisconsin, 0.9% North Carolina, 0.8% Delaware, 0.3% New Jersey, 0.2% Rhode Island, 0.1% New Hampshire, -1.7% California, -4.3% US state and local business tax growth: 3.9% -10% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Total state and local business taxes 9

Excise tax including utilities and insurance Individual income tax on business insurance tax income and other Total business taxes Sales tax income Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado 2.8 Connecticut Delaware 2.2 Florida 2.5 Georgia Hawaii 2.8 Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota 2.2 Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey 8.5 2.8 New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio 5.8 Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania 2.2 South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee 2.8 Texas Utah Vermont Virginia 5.5 Washington 2.5 West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming District of Columbia United States *License taxes include gross receipts taxes levied in Ohio and Texas plus general business licenses. Other taxes include death and gift taxes, documentary and stock transfer taxes, severance taxes and local gross receipts taxes.

A state s business tax burden can be measured in many ways, including the level of business taxes compared to the level of economic activity that is being taxed have been shifted to consumers or owners of factors of production, including workers. Because state and local business tax bases include a diverse mixture of receipts economic activity should be used to determine the measure of aggregate business tax burden that can be compared across states. The last column in Table 5 presents state-by-state estimates of the total effective business tax rate (TEBTR) imposed on business activity by state and local is measured as the ratio of state and local business taxes to private-sector gross state product (GSP), the total value of a state s annual production of goods and services by the private sector. The average TEBTR While the business TEBTRs provide a starting point for comparing burdens across states, they do not of its business tax revenue from sales and property taxes, which are origin-based taxes on business capital that may negatively impact competitiveness. States with the highest TEBTRs tend to be the states with is included in the other taxes category in this analysis. To the extent that severance taxes are shifted forward in higher prices to consumers, they would not be a burden on domestic production and in-state residents but would instead fall on consumers of the natural resource who are typically located outside the state. 5 More generally, a state with an average overall TEBTR may impose relatively high taxes on capital-intensive manufacturers, while imposing relatively low taxes on labor-intensive service industries. As a result, a state with such a tax structure and composition may create disincentives for locating new plant and equipment in the state. of the average tax burden on existing businesses in a state rather than a measure of the marginal tax that would be borne by a company investing in a new facility. For this reason, the TEBTR provides one metric that can be used to evaluate a state s business tax structure, but is not a clear indicator of the competitiveness of a state s business tax system in terms of attracting new investment. For an analysis of the competitiveness of state and local Ernst & Young LLP/COST study, Competitiveness of State and Local Business Taxes on New Investment. That study presents a measure of business tax competitiveness in each state by examining the incremental state and local tax burden on a representative investment in selected industries. North Carolina, for example, has the lowest TEBTR but in a recent analysis of marginal effective tax rates on new mobile capital investments by selected industries, the state s ETR on new investment is higher than the US average.

State State and local Business State Business taxes Total taxes Business taxes Total taxes Business taxes Total taxes taxes as a % Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut 5.5 2.2 Delaware 2.2 Florida Georgia Hawaii 5.8 5.2 8.5 Kansas Kentucky 2.5 Louisiana 5.8 Maine Maryland Massachusetts 8.5 Michigan 25.8 Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada 2.5 New Hampshire 2.8 New Jersey 8.8 New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania 2.2 5.2 South Carolina 2.8 South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia 5.2 Washington 5.8 West Virginia 2.2 Wisconsin Wyoming District of Columbia United States

(State and local business taxes divided by private sector gross state product in each state) Hawaii Alaska Lower TEBTR Higher TEBTR based on data from the U.S. Census Bureau, State and Local Government Finances. Table 5 summarizes the share of taxes paid by business by business is higher than the state share because the governments rely heavily on the individual income tax, which is allocated primarily to households. The business share of total state and local taxes has remained relatively stable over the past decade, as A high share of total state and local taxes paid by business does not necessarily translate into a high effective business tax rate on economic activity. States without individual income taxes generally derive a larger share of their total tax revenue from business taxes, even though business taxes in these states may while Texas collects a larger-than-average share of its taxes from business, its overall level of taxes may be taxes per employee than the US average. case of Delaware, the high business share is due to incorporated in Delaware.

State Business share of state taxes Business share of local taxes Business share of total state and local taxes Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware Florida Georgia Hawaii Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming District of Columbia United States

This study provides estimates of business taxes in each state and expresses business taxes as an effective tax rate on private sector economic activity (TEBTR). Another way to evaluate the level of business businesses receive from government services to the true, businesses are getting what they pay for from government services funded by business taxes. This section presents a comparison of business taxes to the local government services. by category net of user charges and other non-tax by economists at the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, expenditures in the major categories shown in Figure Certain expenditures, such as health and human services, were assigned entirely to households while infrastructure costs, were split evenly between calculated by dividing business taxes in each state business. businesses is the allocation of educational expenditures between households and businesses since educational accrue principally to individuals since improved productivity of an educated workforce results in higher wages paid to workers. However, business owners can receive as owners of capital increase with additional education. This could occur because workers do not completely capture productivity gains in higher wages or an educated workforce improves the productivity of capital (e.g., an educated or trained worker may know resulting in fewer breakdowns or work stoppages). the share of workers with a college education in a city additional productivity from increased education, they spending. 4% 4% 8% 11% 7% 49% Education Public safety Social and veterans services Transportation Health Natural resources Administrative and insurance 18%

education may reduce property crime, which in turn lowers business costs and increases the return to capital. One estimate of the social returns of an of lower government spending for police services, incarceration costs and welfare payments, are equal to wages) that accrues to individuals. 8 sensitive to this assumption, this analysis presents a range of estimates for the share of educational which is calculated as the taxes paid by businesses Assuming that education spending does not directly dollar of government services they receive. The ratio of when one-quarter of education spending is assumed these three educational assumptions, the business share of total state and local government expenditures Wyoming, Alaska and North Dakota have the highest these states, the ratio of business taxes to expenditures are fairly similar across states, with all states except states, educational expenditures make up one-third to one-half of total expenditures, but state educational in Wyoming.

State State and local business taxes Total state and business Business taxes government business Total state and business Business taxes government business Total state and business Business taxes government business Alabama Alaska 8.2 Arizona Arkansas California Colorado 8.5 Connecticut 2.8 2.8 5.8 Delaware 2.2 Florida Georgia Hawaii 2.5 5.8 8.8 Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi 2.2 Missouri 8.5 Montana 2.2 Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma 5.2 Oregon Pennsylvania 2.2 South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah 2.5 Vermont Virginia 2.8 Washington 8.2 West Virginia 2.2 Wisconsin Wyoming District of Columbia 2.2 United States

United States Wyoming Alaska North Dakota Mississippi Delaware West Virginia Rhode Island Oklahoma Texas New Hampshire Arkansas Vermont Maine South Dakota Montana Massachusetts Indiana Kansas Hawaii Alabama South Carolina Kentucky Tennessee New Jersey New Mexico Washington Nevada Georgia Iowa Minnesota Michigan Nebraska New York Illinois Pennsylvania Louisiana Ohio Arizona Colorado Virginia Connecticut Wisconsin Oregon Idaho Missouri North Carolina Utah Florida California District of Columbia Maryland Tax-benefit ratio with 50% of educational expenses allocated to business Tax-benefit ratio with 0% of educational expenses allocated to business 1.3 1.7 1.4 1.4 1.6 1.5 1.4 1.0 1.4 1.4 1.6 1.5 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.1 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.5 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.1 1.2 1.0 1.4 1.4 1.0 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.0 0.9 0.9 1.2 1.0 0.7 1.2 1.5 2.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.5 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.2 5.0 5.0 4.7 4.4 4.3 4.0 3.9 3.8 3.7 3.7 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.5 3.5 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.3 3.3 3.2 3.2 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.0 3.0 2.9 2.8 2.8 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.6 2.6 2.5 2.4 2.3 2.2 6.7 8.2 8.0 10.5 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 11.0 Business taxes per dollar of government expenditures benefiting business

Informing the state tax The state and local business tax estimates in this report provide information that should be of direct interest to state legislators as they consider major changes in business tax policy. For example, one of the most unexpected state tax policy developments introduced primarily by governors, to extend state sales and use taxes to a broad range of services and other items purchased primarily by businesses. These sales tax base-broadening proposals are key components of tax reform proposals that income taxes on individuals and businesses. Legislative bills to expand the sales tax base to include services or reduce exemptions have been debated in Louisiana, Minnesota, Nebraska and Ohio. These bills would fundamentally alter the structure of the retail sales tax. Analyses of these proposals show that expanding the sales tax base to services is fundamentally a proposal to extend the sales tax to businessto-business sales. Revenue estimates for of the additional tax collections from sales additional sales taxes on business input a year in each of the four states. This study estimates that business paid businesses would pay a large percentage of the sales tax increase, the business share of increase in the business share of the retail sales tax that has generated strong opposition to the reform proposals from the business community. The result so far proposals to extend the sales tax to services have not advanced in Nebraska, Louisiana and Minnesota, states where the governors have withdrawn support for the proposals. proposal in their current tax bills. provide information relevant for evaluating recent or proposed state tax changes related to the taxation of pass-through business income on individual income tax returns. Kansas completely eliminated the state s individual income tax on business deduction for business income reported on individual income tax returns, but the bill was vetoed by the governor. A similar proposal is in the tax bill passed by the Ohio Senate. This study s estimates of individual income taxes on business income and corporate income taxes in Kansas indicate that the reduction in taxes from eliminating the tax on pass-through income exceeds total corporate income taxes collected. These changes will lower total business taxes and increase the share collected from C-corporations relative to pass-through entities.

As described in this analysis, state and local business taxes include a wide range of taxes that extend beyond the corporate income tax. State and local business taxes unemployment insurance taxes, severance taxes and individual income taxes on passthrough business income, and now account state and local business taxes. Continued demands on state unemployment insurance increases in unemployment insurance taxes debts to the federal government. State legislative changes that occurred in were a mixed bag of tax increases and decreases, with some legislated tax increases and extensions of surcharges but a number of rate decreases and expiring analysis, there were a number of state tax the level of state and local business taxes through increased sales taxes on businessto-business services. Understanding the level of total business taxes, including sales taxes on business inputs, will help inform continuing discussions of extending the sales tax to business services and other state and local business tax policies.

State and local taxes Total business taxes Other taxes Total state and local taxes Total business taxes Other taxes Total state and local taxes Business tax Property tax on business property General sales and use tax on inputs Corporate net income 28.2 58.8 Unemployment insurance Business license tax Excise taxes 28.5 Public utility tax 28.2 28.5 Severance taxes 8.2 Other business taxes Total business taxes

State Sales tax Excise tax income tax insurance tax Individual income tax through income Total business taxes Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware Florida Georgia Hawaii Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming District of Columbia United States *Taxes categorized under other include death and gift taxes, documentary and stock transfer taxes, severance taxes and local gross receipts taxes.

is due to two reasons. First, recently released U.S. Census Bureau data was used to update income taxes paid on pass-through business income and to estimate local tax collections for the most recent years since annual U.S. Census Bureau data on local taxes lags state data by two years. due to new and revised releases of state and local U.S. Census Bureau data for those years. the state and local personal income paid by businesses was calculated based on the total income taxes paid multiplied by the proportion of proprietorship, partnership, sole-proprietorship and S-corporation income to total gross partnership, sole-proprietorship and S-corporation income was calculated for business proprietorships and partnerships and S-corporations less the net loss for the two categories. This the sum of the net income for business proprietorships and partnerships and S-corporations without subtracting the losses. This results in a lower percentage of personal income paid by businesses. available from U.S. Census Bureau). For were estimated using each state s private gross state product growth rate between state growth rates for sales and public utility taxes. Tax collections by category (e.g., property, corporate income) were constrained to a national total derived using the U.S. Census Bureau quarterly tax growth rate estimates by category rates by category from the U.S. Census Bureau quarterly data were applied to U.S. Census Bureau data) to calculate estimates).

Endnotes 2. The general methodology used to estimate state and local business taxes is described in detail in the Appendix to the Ernst & Young/COST FY2005 50-State Business Tax business tax estimates for prior years have been revised from those published in earlier editions of this study due to the use of included in this study, rather than the previously published estimates. State Tax Notes, State Tax Notes State Tax Notes services), interest and regulatory activities. The methodology used is described in detail in William H. Oakland and William A. Economic Perspectives also note that selective excise taxes, such as the severance tax, impact a small portion of businesses and could be removed Functions, The American Economic Review NBER Working Paper 8605 by Richard H. Mattoon and William A. Testa that allocates expenditures net of user charges and federal transfers to businesses non-tax revenue were assigned to each category. These items were used to calculate the net expenditures for each category. The net expenditures were then allocated to businesses and households in an identical manner to the Mattoon and Testa allocation for all categories included in their analysis. For new categories, EY followed Mattoon and Testa s general principles in allocating State Expenditure Report Section of the District of Columbia s 2012 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report to grow state and local net expenditures. detail in the EY study prepared for COST, What s Wrong with Taxing Business Services? Adverse Effects from Existing and Proposed Sales Taxation of Business Investment and Services

EY Assurance Tax Transactions Advisory About EY EY is a global leader in assurance, tax, transaction and advisory services. The insights and quality services we deliver help build trust and confidence in the capital markets and in economies the world over. We develop outstanding leaders who team to deliver on our promises to all of our stakeholders. better working world for our people, for our clients and for our communities. EY refers to the global organization, and may refer to one or more, of the member firms of Ernst & Young Global Limited, each of which is a separate legal entity. Ernst & Young Global Limited, a UK company limited by guarantee, does not provide services to clients. For more information about our organization, please visit ey.com. Ernst & Young LLP is a client-serving member firm of Ernst & Young Global Limited operating in the US.. All Rights Reserved. ED None