BBI2353 Commercial Bank Management Prepared by Dr Khairul Anuar L6: The Management of Capital www.lecturenotes638.wordpress.com
15-2 Key Topics The Many Tasks of Capital Capital and Risk Exposures Types of Capital In Use Capital as the Centerpiece of Regulation Basel I and Basel II Capital Regulation in the Wake of the Great Recession/Basel III Planning to Meet Capital Needs
15-3 Introduction What is capital? Funds contributed by the owners of a financial institution Raising and retaining sufficient capital to protect the interests of customers, employees, owners, and the general public is tough Why is capital so important in financial-services management? It provides a cushion of protection against risk and promotes public confidence Capital has become the centerpiece of supervision and regulation today
15-4 The Many Tasks Capital Performs 1. Provides a cushion against the risk of failure 2. Provides funds to help institutions get started 3. Promotes public confidence 4. Provides funds for growth 5. Regulator of growth 6. Regulatory tool to limit risk exposure
15-5 Capital and Risks Key Risks in Banking and Financial Institutions Management Credit Risk Liquidity Risk Interest Rate Risk Operational Risk Exchange Risk Crime Risk
15-6 Capital and Risks (continued) Defenses against Risks Quality Management Diversification Geographic Portfolio Deposit Insurance Owners Capital
15-7 Types of Capital in Use 1. Common stock 2. Preferred stock 3. Surplus 4. Undivided profits 5. Equity reserves 6. Subordinated debentures 7. Minority interest in consolidated subsidiaries 8. Equity commitment notes
15-8 TABLE 15 1 Capital Accounts of FDIC-Insured U.S. Commercial Banks, December 31, 2010
15-9 One of the Great Issues in the History of Banking: How Much Capital Is Really Needed? Regulatory Approach to Evaluating Capital Needs Reasons for Capital Regulation 1. To limit risk of failures 2. To preserve public confidence 3. To limit losses to the government and other institutions arising from deposit insurance claims
Leading Nations The Basel Agreement An international agreement on new capital standards Designed to keep their capital positions strong Reduce inequalities in capital requirements among different countries Promote fair competition Catch up with recent changes in financial services and financial innovation In particular, the expansion of off-balance-sheet commitments Formally approved in July 1988 Included countries such as: The United States, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the Netherlands, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and Luxembourg 15-10
Leading Nations (continued) Basel I The original Basel capital standards are known today as Basel I Various sources of capital were divided into two tiers: Tier 1 (core) capital Common stock and surplus, undivided profits (retained earnings), qualifying noncumulative perpetual preferred stock, minority interest in the equity accounts of consolidated subsidiaries, and selected identifiable intangible assets less goodwill and other intangible assets Tier 2 (supplemental) capital Allowance (reserves) for loan and lease losses, subordinated debt capital instruments, mandatory convertible debt, intermediate-term preferred stock, cumulative perpetual preferred stock with unpaid dividends, and equity notes and other long-term capital instruments that combine both debt and equity features 15-11
Leading Nations (continued) Basel I In order for a bank to qualify as adequately capitalized, it must have: 1. A ratio of core capital (Tier 1) to total risk-weighted assets of at least 4 percent 2. A ratio of total capital (the sum of Tier 1 and Tier 2 capital) to total risk-weighted assets of at least 8 percent, with the amount of Tier 2 capital limited to 100 percent of Tier 1 capital 15-12
Leading Nations (continued) Calculating Risk-Weighted Assets Each asset item on a bank s balance sheet and each offbalance-sheet commitment it has made are multiplied by a risk-weighting factor Designed to reflect its credit risk exposure The most closely watched off-balance-sheet items are standby letters of credit and long-term, legally binding credit commitments 15-13
Leading Nations (continued) Calculating Risk-Weighted Assets To compute this bank s risk-weighted assets: 1. Compute the credit-equivalent amount of each off-balancesheet (OBS) item 15-14
Leading Nations (continued) Calculating Risk-Weighted Assets To compute this bank s risk-weighted assets: 2. Multiply each balance sheet item and the credit-equivalent amount of each OBS item by its risk weight 15-15
Leading Nations (continued) Calculating the Capital-to-Risk-Weighted Assets Ratio Under Basel I, once we know a bank s total risk-weighted assets and its Tier 1 and Tier 2 capital amounts, we can determine its required capital adequacy ratios 15-16
Leading Nations (continued) Capital Requirements Attached to Derivatives The Basel I capital standards were adjusted to take account of the risk exposure banks may face from derivatives Futures, options, swaps, interest rate cap and floor contracts, and other instruments Sometimes expose a bank to counterparty risk The danger that a customer will fail to pay or to perform, forcing the bank to find a replacement contract with another party that may be less satisfactory 15-17
Leading Nations (continued) Bank Capital Standards and Market Risk Basel I failed to account for market risk The losses a bank may suffer due to adverse changes in interest rates, security prices, and currency and commodity prices The risk weights on bank assets were designed primarily to take account of credit risk (not market risk) In an effort to deal with these and other forms of market risk, in 1996 the Basel Committee approved a modification to the rules Permitted the largest banks to conduct risk measurement and estimate the amount of capital necessary to cover market risk Led to a third capital ratio (Tier 3) 15-18
Leading Nations (continued) Basel II Bankers found ways around many of Basel I s restrictions Capital arbitrage Instead of making banks less risky, parts of Basel I seemed to encourage banks to become more risky Basel I represented a one size fits all approach to capital regulation It failed to recognize that no two banks are alike in terms of their risk profiles Basel II set up a system in which capital requirements would be more sensitive to risk and protect against more types of risk than Basel I Basel II would be gradually phased in for the largest international banks 15-19
Leading Nations (continued) Pillars of Basel II 1. Minimum capital requirements for each bank based on its own estimated risk exposure from credit, market, and operational risks 2. Supervisory review of each bank s risk-assessment procedures and the adequacy of its capital to ensure they are reasonable 3. Greater public disclosure of each bank s true financial condition so that market discipline could become a more powerful force compelling excessively risky banks to lower their risk exposure 15-20
Leading Nations (continued) Basel II and Credit Risk Models Credit risk models Computer algorithms that attempt to measure a lender s exposure to default by its borrowing customers or to credit downgradings Most credit risk models develop estimates based upon: Borrower credit ratings The probability those credit ratings will change The probable amount of recovery should some loans default The possibility of changing interest-rate spreads between riskier and less risky loans 15-21
Leading Nations (continued) Basel II and Credit Risk Models Under Basel I, minimum capital requirements remained the same for most types of loans regardless of credit rating Under Basel II, minimum capital requirements were designed to vary significantly with credit quality 15-22
Leading Nations (continued) A Dual (Large-Bank, Small-Bank) Set of Rules Basel II was designed to operate under one set of capital rules for the handful of largest multinational banks and another set for more numerous smaller banking firms Regulators were concerned that smaller banks could be overwhelmed by: The heavy burdens of gathering risk-exposure information Performing complicated risk calculations Basel II anticipated that smaller institutions would be able to continue to use simpler approaches in determining their capital requirements and risk exposures, paralleling Basel I rules 15-23
Leading Nations (continued) Problems Accompanying the Implementation of Basel II Basel II was not perfect Some forms of risk had no generally accepted measurement scale Operational Risk How do we add up the different forms of risk exposure in order to get an accurate picture of a bank s total risk exposure? What should we do about the business cycle? Most banks are more likely to face risk exposure in the middle of an economic recession than they will in a period of economic expansion For example, the Global credit crisis of 2007-2009 Some have expressed concern about improving regulator competence 15-24
Leading Nations (continued) Basel III: Another Major Regulatory Step Underway, Born in Global Crisis Basel II was never fully implemented Had to move toward Basel III in order to prevent future crises Key issue in Basel III Determining the volume and mix of capital the world s leading banks should maintain if their troubled assets generate massive losses Capital requirements laid down in Basel I and II apparently were inadequate in the face of the latest credit crash Bankers found ways to hold both less capital in total and a weaker mix of kinds of capital 15-25
Leading Nations (continued) Basel III: Another Major Regulatory Step Underway, Born in Global Crisis Proponents of Basel III called for greater total capitalization, stronger definition of what belongs in banks capital accounts Volcker Rule was proposed in the U.S. Implementation of Basel III could take many years Implementation would be phased in slowly, beginning in 2012 and possibly be completed close to 2019 Basel III covers the capital, liquidity, and debt positions of individual international banks and also broader issues associated with global business cycles and systemic risks 15-26
15-27 Changing Capital Standards Inside the United States Several new capital rules created recently by U.S. regulatory agencies were mandated by the FDIC Improvement Act of 1991 Requires federal regulators to take Prompt Corrective Action (PCA) when an insured depository institution s capital falls below acceptable levels U.S. bank regulators created capital-adequacy categories for implementing PCA: 1. Well capitalized 2. Adequately capitalized 3. Undercapitalized 4. Significantly undercapitalized 5. Critically undercapitalized
15-28 Planning to Meet Capital Needs Raising Capital Internally Dividend Policy The board of directors and management must agree on the appropriate retention ratio and dividend payout ratio Key factor - How fast the financial firm can allow its assets to grow so that its current ratio of capital to assets is protected from erosion
15-29 Planning to Meet Capital Needs (continued) Raising Capital Internally Dividend Policy
15-30 Planning to Meet Capital Needs (continued) Raising Capital Externally If a financial firm does need to raise capital from outside sources, it has several options: 1. Selling common stock 2. Selling preferred stock 3. Issuing debt capital 4. Selling assets 5. Leasing facilities 6. Swapping stock for debt securities The choice of which method to use is based on their effects on a financial firm s earnings per share
15-31 TABLE 15 2 Methods of Raising External Capital for a Financial Firm
15-32 Quick Quiz What crucial roles does capital play in the management and viability of a financial firm? What are the most important and least important forms of capital held by U.S.-insured banks? What is the rationale for having the government set capital standards for financial institutions as opposed to letting the private marketplace set those standards? How is the Basel Agreement likely to affect a bank s choices among assets it would like to acquire? What are the differences among Basel I, II, and III? What are the principal sources of external capital for a financial institution?