The calculation of the risk-weighted securitised exposure amount under the Standardised Approach

Similar documents
Guideline. Capital Adequacy Requirements (CAR) Structured Credit Products. Effective Date: November 2017 / January

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. Consultative Document. Asset Securitisation. Supporting Document to the New Basel Capital Accord

3 Decree of Národná banka Slovenska of 26 April 2011

Methods and conditions for reflecting the effects of credit risk mitigation techniques

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. Basel III Document. Revisions to the securitisation framework

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. Second Working Paper on Securitisation. Issued for comment by 20 December 2002

COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) No /.. of

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision

Fédération Bancaire Française Responses to CP 18

DECREE. No. 123/2007 Coll., stipulating the prudential rules for banks, credit unions and investment firms

RS Official Gazette No 103/2016

Instructions. for the. Completion of the Capital Adequacy Return. for Institutions licensed under the. Financial Institutions Act, 2008

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. Basel III Document. Revisions to the securitisation framework

Prudential sourcebook for Banks, Building Societies and Investment Firms. Chapter 11. Disclosure (Pillar 3)

Ordinance No. 7. Chapter One General Provisions. Chapter Two Requirements and Criteria for Organisaiton and Risk Management

PROPOSAL FOR A REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL. on prudential requirements for credit institutions and investment firms

Prudential sourcebook for Banks, Building Societies and Investment Firms. Chapter 5. Credit risk mitigation

Interim financial statements (unaudited)

RS Official Gazette, No 103/2016

RS Official Gazette, No 82/2017

Consultative document

Leverage Ratio Rules and Guidelines

PART FOUR CAPITAL ADEQUACY HEADING I THE CALCULATION OF CAPITAL ADEQUACY. Capital adequacy on an individual basis. Article 37. Article 38.

CRR IV - Article 194 CRR IV Principles governing the eligibility of credit risk mitigation techniques legal opinion

Allen & Overy Briefing Paper No.7 The Securitisation Framework

Proposed Rules for US Implementation of the Basel II Standardized Approach. A Summary of the Rules Applicable to Securitization Exposures

TREATMENT OF SECURITIZATIONS UNDER PROPOSED RISK-BASED CAPITAL RULES

Leverage Ratio Rules and Guidelines

ANNEX II REPORTING ON LEVERAGE RATIO

Draft Large Exposures Framework

Annex IV (b) - INSTRUCTIONS LEVERAGE RATIO REPORTING (Revised Annex II of EBA/CP/2012/06)

(Non-legislative acts) REGULATIONS

SECTION I.1 - CREDIT RISK: STANDARDISED APPROACH General Principles

EBA Consultation Paper on the Guidelines on Interpretation of STS Criteria. Public hearing, 11 June 2018

Superseded document. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. Consultative Document. The New Basel Capital Accord. Issued for comment by 31 July 2003

BASEL COMMITTEE ON BANKING SUPERVISION. To Participants in Quantitative Impact Study 2.5

With our compliments. Tweaks to a sound system. By Mark Nicolaides of Latham & Watkins

1.1. Funded credit protection

Consultation Paper. Draft Guidelines On Significant Credit Risk Transfer relating to Article 243 and Article 244 of Regulation 575/2013

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision

Interim financial statements (unaudited) as at 30 September 2009

RBI/ /167 DBR.No.BP.BC.43/ / December 01, 2016

GUIDELINES ON SIGNIFICANT RISK TRANSFER FOR SECURITISATION EBA/GL/2014/05. 7 July Guidelines

Basel II Pillar 3 Disclosures Year ended 31 December 2009

ANNEX XI REPORTING ON LEVERAGE

Resolution No. 76/2010 of the Polish Financial Supervision Authority of 10 March 2010

The new Deadline for the submission of Expressions of Interest is 11 October 2010 (postponed from 6 October 2010)

Guideline. Capital Adequacy Requirements (CAR) Definition of Capital. Effective Date: November 2016 / January

Basel Committee Proposes Simple, Transparent and Comparable Securitisation Framework for Short-Term Securitisations

Current on: 28 December 2012

Securitisation Framework

ANNEXES. to the. COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) No.../...

COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) No /.. of

ANNEX E CONTENTS LIST E-1 Eligibility 1.1. Funded credit protection On-balance sheet netting Master netting agreements repurchase

Consultation Paper Draft technical standards on content and format of the STS notification under the Securitisation Regulation

Pillar 3 report. Table of Contents. Introduction 1. Scope of Application 2. Capital 3. Credit Risk Exposures 4. Credit Provision and Losses 6

Final Draft Regulatory Technical Standards

EN ANNEX V 'ANNEX XI REPORTING ON LEVERAGE

ANNEX 2 to the Call for Expression of Interest No JER-011/1. Part I: Description of the Financial Instrument (Guarantee)

Liquidity Policy. Prudential Supervision Department Document BS13. Issued: January Ref #

PROGRAMME MEMORANDUM TRANSSEC PROPRIETARY LIMITED (TO BE RENAMED TRANSSEC (RF) LIMITED)

Basel I-A: A Capital Framework for the Rest of the Industry

Incorporating the requirements of APS 330 Third Quarter Update as at 30 June 2018

Information page Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive Operating conditions Investment in securitisation positions

Content. International and legal framework Mandate Structure of the draft RTS References Annex

Annex 8. I. Definition of terms

Liquidity Coverage Ratio Information (Consolidated) Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. Quantitative Impact Study 3 Technical Guidance

PILLAR 3 DISCLOSURE APS 330: PUBLIC DISCLOSURE

OWN FUNDS ORIGINAL OWN FUNDS PAID UP CAPITAL

General comments. 1 See

Insurance Solvency Standards: guarantees and off-balance sheet exposures

Other terms and conditions. : The tenure for each issuance of the Capital Securities shall be perpetual. (a) Tenure of the Capital Securities

Guidance Note Capital Requirements Directive Credit Risk Standardised Approach

Basel II Pillar 3 Disclosures

Structured Finance. Blue Titanium Conduit Limited. ABCP/South Africa Final Report

PUBLISHING OF THE DATA AND INFORMATION OF THE BANK ON JUNE 30 th 2018

2016 Pillar 3 Report. Incorporating the requirements of APS 330 First Quarter Update as at 31 December 2015

HSBC BANK MIDDLE EAST LIMITED QATAR BRANCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS AT AND FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2008

Risk review and disclosures under Basel II Framework for the period ended 30 September 2009 (Amounts in Rs. 000s)

EBA/RTS/2013/07 05 December EBA FINAL draft Regulatory Technical Standards

Introduction... 1 Basel II... 1 Pillar 3 disclosures Consolidation basis... 3 Scope of Basel II permissions... 3

PRA RULEBOOK CRR FIRMS INSTRUMENT 2013

2016 PILLAR 3 REPORT. Incorporating the requirements of APS 330 Third Quarter Update as at 30 June 2016

Applying IFRS. IFRS 12 Example disclosures for interests in unconsolidated structured entities

MODULE 1. Guidance to completing the Standardised Approach to Credit Risk module of BSL/2

ENSI: EIF and NPIs Securitisation Initiative

Guideline. Capital Adequacy Requirements (CAR) Definition of Capital. Effective Date: November 2018

PROGRAMME MEMORANDUM SUPERDRIVE INVESTMENTS (PROPRIETARY) LIMITED (RF)

1. INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE

Federal Reserve Adopts Single Counterparty Credit Limits

C L E A R I N G R U L E S O F N A S D A Q D E R I V A T I V E S M A R K E T S. Loss Sharing Rules

BOM/BSD 18/March 2008 BANK OF MAURITIUS. Guideline on. Standardised Approach to Credit Risk

PRIME COLLATERALISED SECURITIES

Pillar 3 report. Table of Contents. Introduction 1. Scope of Application 2. Capital 3. Credit Risk Exposures 4. Credit Provision and Losses 6

Brussels, XXX [ ](2016) XXX draft. ANNEXES 1 to 4 ANNEXES

RHB Bank Berhad. Basel II Pillar 3 Quantitative Disclosures 30 th June 2011 Consolidated basis

Rating Methodology. Structured Finance and Securitisation. Global Master Structured Finance Rating Criteria Updated June 2018

Securitisation - ten years on from the financial crisis. Chris Dalton, Chief Executive Officer

Structured Finance.. Rating Methodology..

Transcription:

The calculation of the risk-weighted securitised exposure amount under the Standardised Approach Annex 17 I. Definition of terms The following definitions shall apply for the purposes of this Annex: a) Liquidity facility means a securitised exposure implied by a contractual arrangement to provide cash to overcome mismatch in cash flows to the investors, b) Excess spread means servicing and management fees as well as other fees and income associated with securitised exposures, net of expenses and charges, c) An asset-backed commercial paper programme means a securitisation programme that predominantly issues securities with an original maturity of one year or less, II. Standardised Approach for the calculation of the risk-weighted securitised exposure When calculating the risk-weighted securitised or re-securitised exposure, the liable entity that uses the Standardised Approach shall proceed as follows: 1. The securitised exposure amount is multiplied by a risk weight determined in accordance with Table 1. Table 1 Credit quality step 1 2 3 4 (only for external rating other all other credit quality steps than shortterm) Risk weight for 20 % 50 % 100 % 350 % 1250 % securitised exposure not constituting resecuritisation Risk weight for resecuritised exposure 40 % 100 % 225 % 650 % 1250 % 2. Unrated securitised positions are assigned a risk weight of 1250%, unless they are positions pursuant to paragraphs 4 to 8. The Originator and the sponsor 3. The aggregate value of the risk-weighted securitised exposures resulting from the securitised positions of the originator or the sponsor is limited by the risk-weighted exposure amounts that would be determined by the originator or the sponsor had the exposures not been securitised.

Unrated positions 4. If the liable entity at all times knows the composition of the pool of underlying exposures, it determines the values of risk-weighted securitised exposures for unrated positions by multiplying each securitised exposure by the risk weight and the concentration coefficient, taking into account that a) the risk weight equals to the weighted average of risk weights in the pool of underlying exposures arrived at according to the Standardised Approach, as if such exposures had not been securitised, b) the concentration coefficient equals to a fraction with its numerator being equal to the sum of all nominal amounts for all tranches and its denominator being equal to the sum of the nominal amounts of the tranche in which the liable entity holds a position and all pari passu or junior tranches. c) The product of the risk weight and the concentration coefficient shall not exceed 1250% and fall below the risk weight of the closest senior rated position. Asset-backed commercial paper programme 5. For an asset-backed commercial paper programme (hereinafter the ABCP programme ), the liable entity assigns the higher of the following risk weights to the position: 100% or the highest risk weight that would be assigned to any underlying exposure in the securitised position, if the following conditions are met: a) the securitised position is economically in the second loss or a better position within the given securitisation and the first loss position provides sufficient credit enhancement, b) the associated credit risk is the equivalent of investment grade, c) the liable entity holding this position does not retain or provide the first loss position within the given securitisation. Unrated liquidity facilities 6. For unrated liquidity facilities meeting the criteria for eligible liquidity facilities, the exposure amount is determined by multiplying the nominal amount of the liquidity facility by a conversion factor. The liable entity assigns the highest risk weight belonging to any underlying exposure covered by the relevant facility to such an adjusted amount. The eligible liquidity facility criteria are as follows: a) the facility documentation must clearly identify and limit circumstances under which the relevant facility may be drawn, b) the facility shall not be used as a credit support to cover losses that are known prior to a draw, in particular to provide liquidity for exposures that are in default at the time of the draw or to purchase assets for a price higher than the market value. c) the facility shall not be used as a permanent or regular source of financing for the relevant securitisation,

d) repayments of the relevant facility shall not be subordinated to the receivables of investors, except that these are receivables from interest rate and foreign exchange derivatives and are paid duly and in time. e) the liquidity facility cannot be drawn after all applicable credit enhancements have been exhausted, f) the facility documentation contains a provision that 1. automatically reduces the amount that can be drawn by the amount of exposures in default, 2. terminates the facility if the underlying pool of exposures consists of externally rated exposures and the average quality of the underlying exposures falls below investment grade. 7. For the purpose of the application of paragraph 6, a 50% conversion factor shall be used. 8. A cash advance facility is assigned a 0% conversion factor, if a) the eligible liquidity facility criteria are met, b) the liable entity is entitled to cancel this facility without prior notice c) the reimbursement of such a facility is senior to all other claims resulting from securitised exposures. Revolving exposures with an early amortisation provision 9. When revolving exposures with an early amortisation provision are securitised, the originator determines the risk-weighted exposure amount in respect of both the originator s interest and the investor s interest. 10. For securitisation structures wherein the underlying pool comprises also other than revolving exposures, the early amortisation outlined below is applied only to that portion of the underlying pool containing revolving exposures. 11. The notional amount of the underlying exposures sold for securitisation is separated into two parts in a ratio, in which the cash flows generated by the principal, interest and other payments resulting from the underlying exposures are divided between the originator and the investors. The originator s interest is the exposure amount attached to the notional part of the underlying exposures determined by the ratio between the cash flows that are not designed for the holders of the securitised positions and the total cash flows. The originator s interest may only be recognised if it is subordinated to the investor s interest. The investor s interest is the exposure amount attached to the remaining notional part of the underlying exposures. 12. The originator s interest is not deemed to be a securitised position and is treated as if the exposures had not been securitised for the purpose of calculating risk-weighted exposure amounts. 13. Securitisation types that are not deemed to be the securitisation of revolving exposures with an early amortisation provision and, consequently, the originator is not required to calculate the additional amount of risk-weighted securitised exposures, are as follows:

a) Securitisation of revolving exposures where the investor remains fully exposed to future draws by obligors and is not entitled to return the underlying facilities to the originator even after an early amortisation event has occurred, or b) securitisation where any early amortisation provision is solely triggered by events not related to the repayment of the underlying exposures or the deteriorating performance of the originator, such as material changes in tax laws or regulations. 14. The total amount of the risk-weighted securitised revolving exposures with an early amortisation provision is limited by the greater of: a) the amount of risk-weighted securitised exposures retained by the originator, or b) the risk-weighted exposure amount that would apply had the exposures not been securitised. 15. Net gains from the capitalisation of future income from a securitisation transaction by which the original capital is reduced (Tier 1) are not included in the maximum amount of securitised revolving exposures pursuant to the above paragraph. 16. When calculating the risk-weighted revolving exposures with an early amortisation provision, the originator will multiply its interest by the relevant conversion factor pursuant to Table 3 herein and the risk weight equal to the weighted average of the risk weights for the underlying exposures had the exposures not been securitised. 17. An early amortisation provision is considered controlled, when all of the following criteria are fulfilled: a) the originator has an appropriate plan in place to ensure that it has sufficient capital and liquidity available in the event of an early amortisation, b) throughout the duration of the transaction there is the same pro rata sharing based on the originators and the investors relative shares of all the payments, profits or losses and recoveries resulting from the underlying exposures determined at a single date or a number of dates each month, c) the amortisation period is set to be sufficient for at least 90% of the total underlying exposures representing both the investor s and the originator s interest at the beginning of the early amortisation period to have been repaid or recognised as in default, d) the speed of repayment is not more rapid than would be allowed by straight-line amortisation over the period set out in criterion c). 18. For securitisation with an early amortisation provision, where a) retail exposures are securitised, b) such exposures are uncommitted and unconditionally cancellable without prior notice, and c) early amortisation is triggered by the excess spread falling below a preset level, the originator must compare the three-month average excess spread level with the level at which excess spread is required to be trapped. 19. In cases where such a transaction does not require excess spread to be trapped, the trapping is deemed to be 4.5% above the early amortisation triggering level. 20. For securitisation with an early amortisation provision, where

a) retail exposures are securitised, b) such exposures are uncommitted and unconditionally cancellable without prior notice, and c) early amortisation is triggered by a quantitative indicator other than the threemonth average excess spread, the Czech National Bank may permit the liable entity to apply a treatment in respect of a particular securitisation similar to the procedure pursuant to paragraphs 18 and 19. If the Czech National Bank intends to permit such a treatment, it will notify all the competent authorities of the Member States and will take into account their opinion. The Czech National Bank shall disclose the result of such consultations and conclusions made. Securitisation subject to a controlled early amortisation provision conversion factor Table 3 subject to a noncontrolled early amortisation provision conversion factor of revolving exposures pursuant to paragraph 18 3-month average excess spread is 133.33% of the trapping or more 0 % 0 % is less than 133.33%% to 100% of the 1 % 5 % trapping is less than 100% to 75% of the trapping 2 % 15 % is less than 75% to 50% of the trapping 10 % 50 % is less than 50% to 25% of the trapping 20 % 100 % is less than 25% of the trapping 40 % 100 % other revolving exposures 90 % 100 % Credit risk mitigation techniques 21. If funded or unfunded credit protection is provided directly for a given securitised position, this protection may be reflected in the calculation of risk-weighted securitised exposures according to credit risk mitigation techniques pursuant to Article 102 to 107 and Annexes 15 and 16 of the Decree. Reduction in risk-weighted exposure amounts 22. The liable entity may, as an alternative, deduct the securitised exposure amount in respect of which a risk weight of 1250% is assigned from its capital, rather than assign this risk weight and calculate the risk-weighted securitised exposure amount. The eligible funded credit protection may be reflected in the exposure amount. 23. If the liable entity makes use of the alternative procedure pursuant to paragraph 22, it will reduce the limit set in paragraph 3 accordingly.