CHAPTER 5 Growth and Pattern of Revenue of the Central Government

Similar documents
Chapter 3 Trends and Composition of Central Government Finances in India

Union Finances: Assessment of Revenue and Expenditure

Fiscal Deficit and Goods and Services Tax (GST) in India: Issues and Challenges

CHAPTER III CONCEPTUAL FRAME WORK

State Finances. Chapter Introduction

TAMILNADU STATE FINANCES

Fiscal Landscape of Odisha: An analysis of Deficits and Expenditures ABSTRACT

Significant changes in the proposed Direct Taxes Code, 2013

CHAPTER 6 DIRECT AND INDIRECT TAXES

Accounts at a Glance CONTENTS. Introduction 3

An analysis on prospects of implementation of Goods and Services Tax in India

Indian Taxation System for Banking & SSC - GK Notes in PDF

Assets and Liabilities Management in Indian Central Government

The Impact of Indian Taxation system on its Economic Growth

AN APPRAISAL OF CORPORATE TAX IN INDIA: A SELF ASSESSMENT

State Finances of Odisha:

DOMESTIC SAVING. National Accounts Statistics Sources & Methods, 2007 CHAPTER 24. quasi government bodies and nondepartmental

PUBLIC FINANCE. Samir K Mahajan, M.Sc. Ph.D

Social Security Provisioning in Bihar: A Case for Universal Old Age Pension

Union Budget 2014 Analysis of Major Direct tax proposals

A monthly publication from South Indian Bank. To kindle interest in economic affairs... To empower the student community...

Trends in Central and State Finances

REVENUE FROM VAT IN PUNJAB AND HARYANA

Dependence of States on Central Transfers: State-wise Analysis

Prepared by Basanta K Pradhan & Sangeeta Chakravarty January and February 2013

A Study on Fiscal Implications of 5 th & 6 th CPC On the Union & States Report by - IIM Calcuta Appointed by 7 th CPC

Fiscal Developments in India since ; A Special look at SEZ Act. Arvind Kumar, Dept of Revenue, Govt. of India

Goods and Services Tax A Roadmap for India

MEDIUM TERM FISCAL POLICY STATEMENT

Legislative Brief The Direct Taxes Code Bill, 2010

SUGGESTIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Notes and Definitions Numbers in the text, tables, and figures may not add up to totals because of rounding. Dollar amounts are generally rounded to t

GOODS AND SERVICE TAX (G.S.T.) OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS, CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTIONS

Raising Funds from the Capital Market: Challenges for the Private Sector

Budget Analysis Rajasthan Budget

CHAPTER IV INTER STATE COMPARISON OF TOTAL REVENUE. and its components namely, tax revenue and non-tax revenue. We also

The Problem of Widening Current Account Deficit of India

CERTIFICATE COURSE ON INDIRECT TAXES

FIDC. Finance Industry Development Council

IMPACT OF GOODS AND SERVICE TAX (GST)

CARE Ratings Survey on the Indian Economy: FY16

Sai Om Journal of Commerce & Management A Peer Reviewed International Journal

PUBLIC FINANCE MODULE 1 BUDGET

Public expenditure is the expenditure incurred by public authorities-central,

Kerala Budget Analysis

Legislative Brief. The Draft Direct Taxes Code Bill, Highlights of the Bill. Key Issues and Analysis

CHAPTER 03. A Modern and. Pensions System

SALIENT FEATURES OF PROPOSED GST

ICI RESEARCH PERSPECTIVE

Budget Analysis Haryana Budget

Subsidies in the fiscal system would be considerably understated if one

AN INTRODUCTION TO TAX STRUCTURE

Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement between Taiwan and Singapore

SIPOY SATISH CA IPCC MAY-2013/ NOV-2013 F.Y F. A MARKS. VALUE ADDED TAX `100

5 Fiscal Policy. Figure 5.1: Fiscal Deficit - Target and Actual (percent of GDP) Target Actual 10. FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 Source: Ministryof Finance

Rates, Redistribution and the GST

Salient features of Direct Tax Proposals of Union Budget 2011

As proposed in The Finance Bill, 2017 introduced by Finance Minister of India on 1 st February, 2017.

STATE FINANCES for the year ended 31 March 2015

FISCAL CONSOLIDATION STRATEGY OF THE UNION GOVERNMENT

Chapter 5. Conclusions, Findings and Suggestions

FOR January, 2018

Prepared by Basanta K Pradhan & Sangeeta Chakravarty December 2012

The fiscal adjustment after the crisis in Argentina

NON PERFORMING ASSETS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON STATE BANK OF INDIA AND PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK

E- ISSN X ISSN THE TREND AND PATTERN OF INCOME TAXATION IN INDIA

INDIA S EXTERNAL DEBT

FINANCE ACT, EXPLANATORY NOTES TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE FINANCE ACT, Explanatory notes to the provisions of the Finance Act, 2011

How budgetary policy has shaped the Irish income tax system

For personal use only

PUBLIC SECTOR PLAN : RESOURCES AND ALLOCATIONS

VII. Finance Commissions in India: An Assessment

Growth of Manufacturing Sector in Post-Reforms India Some Disquieting Features

26 th Year of Publication. A monthly publication from South Indian Bank. To kindle interest in economic affairs... To empower the student community...

CHAPTER 2 FINANCIAL RESOURCES

GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR ACCOUNTS AT A GLANCE

November 21, Economic Intelligence Unit Baroda Corporate Center Bank of Baroda Mumbai Indian Economic Briefs

GENERAL AGREEMENT ON TARIFFS AND TRADE

GST and the States: Sharing Tax Administration

Budget Connect Pre-Budget Survey

Goods and services tax (The renaissance in Indian taxation)

International Taxation

Survey of Private Pension Plans in The Bahamas (2004)

Investment assets totalled EUR billion at the end of 2016 return for the past 20 years 4.3 per cent in real terms

Class-12 NATIONAL INCOME What is National Income? 1. Concept and Meaning of National Income

As proposed in The Finance Bill, 2016 introduced by Finance Minister of India on 29th February, 2016.

SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS

The Finance Act, the finer aspects

Decoding GST. For illustrative purpose only

Growth of Unorganized Manufacturing Sector in India Analysis of National Sample Survey Studies

Income Tax Changes made in Income Tax Provisions in the Union Budget which would affect Salaried Class

Notes and Definitions Numbers in the text, tables, and figures may not add up to totals because of rounding. Dollar amounts are generally rounded to t

Guatemala. 1. General trends. 2. Economic policy. In 2009, the Guatemalan economy faced serious challenges as attempts were made to mitigate

1

INDIA S DIRECT TAX SYSTEM

2. The taxation structure as described by the Implicit Tax Rate (ITR) as % of taxable income on labor, capital and consumption;

CHAPTER 3 RESOURCE MOBILIZATION BY PUBLIC AND PRIVATE SECTOR MUTUAL FUNDS

EXPLANATORY NOTES ON DATA SOURCE AND METHODOLOGY

IFRS Update. June PRECISE. PROVEN. PERFORMANCE.

Transcription:

CHAPTER 5 Growth and Pattern of Revenue of the Central Government In order to perform it s functions-social, economic and general-government needs funds which have to be garnered from a variety of sources (Sharma, 2001). These can be collected from the public in the form of taxes and non-taxes. In addition to these, the government can collect commercial revenue. It also collects certain charges for special services to the individuals, such as for grant of patents or for recording titles and documents. The other sources of public revenue are receipts from public enterprises run on competitive lines, receipts from special assessments, receipts from voluntary public loans. Before discussing about the classification of revenue of the central government, it is important to note that many fiscal experts think of taxation as the sole source of public revenue. The Cameralists writing in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries regarded, taxation as the last and least of the sources of public revenue (Lutz, 36). Likewise, Taylor (48) regarded taxation as the primary source of revenue in all economies. But Groves (64) believes that there are several other government sources of revenue which have been, at certain times and places, very important. According to him, Taxes are by no means the only source of public revenue. Others include income from 112

the public domain and public enterprises, fees, fines and special assessments. Classification of Receipts of the Central Government The first attempt, in India, to classify the transactions was made in 57-58 and the budget presented for the year 57-58 was wholly based on this classification. This proposal classified the income and expenditure of the government into the revenue account and capital account. In this chapter, the revenue part is explored, and the receipts on revenue account include revenue received in the form of tax and non-tax revenue. On the other hand, receipts on capital account is composed of loans from the market, aid received from external sources, small savings, state and public provident funds, special deposits of nongovernment provident funds, and special securities. Thus, the revenue receipts of the governments - centre and states are part of revenue account and capital receipts are part of capital account. All those receipts which are non-redeemable may be termed as revenue receipts. These include revenue from taxes and from non-tax sources of revenue such as income from public undertakings like post and telegraph, railways, etc. While those receipts of the government which create liability or reduce financial assets may be called capital receipts. These include market borrowings, external assistance, recoveries of loans, small savings, provident 113

funds, special deposits of non-government provident funds, special securities and others. Table 5.1 shows the amount of total receipts, revenue receipts and capital receipts of the central government. Graph 5.1 exhibits that total receipts, revenue receipts and capital receipts of the central government of India are showing an increasing trend. Table 5.2 shows that during 75-76 to 2005-06, the total receipts as well as revenue and capital receipts of the central government increased at the rate of 14 per cent per annum. Total receipts of the central government have been continuously increasing since 75-76 except for the years 79-80, 97-98, 2001-02 and 2005-06. The deterioration in 79-80 was due to the decline in interest receipts, shortfall in recoveries of loans and advances and lower receipts under external assistance than originally anticipated (Economic Survey, 79-80). Significant measures were taken by the government to augment revenue such as reduction of maximum marginal rate of personal income tax on the recommendation of the Direct Taxes Enquiry Committee, 71 (Economic Survey, 80-81), reduction of highest wealth tax rate (Economic Survey, 85-86). In view of the guidelines of Long Term Fiscal Policy (LTFP), significant reforms were also carried out in the area of corporate taxation which aimed at increasing the generation of internal resources such as introduction of New Investment Deposit Account Scheme, discontinuance of surcharge on corporate tax (Economic 114

Table 5.1: Total Receipts of the Central Government of India Year (per cent) Revenue Receipts* (Rs. crore) (per cent) Capital Receipts** (Rs. crore) (per cent) Total Receipts (Rs. crore) 75-76 74.66 7848.64 25.34 2663.36 100 10512.00 76-77 70.07 8548.67 29.93 3651.18 100 129.85 77-78 77.60 9509.18 22.40 2746.48 100 12255.66 78-79 72.34 10991.35 27.66 4203. 100 154.54 79-80 73.60 11042.67 26.40 3965.60 100 15008.27 80-81 66.42 12481.39 33.58 6310.44 100 18791.83 81-82 67.54 15137.02 32.46 7275.43 100 22412.45 82-83 65.77 17504.29 34.23 9110.56 100 26614.85 83-84 61.94 715.02 38.06 12116.04 100 31831.06 84-85 62.64 23546.64 37.36 14041.06 100 37587.70 85-86 61.65 28039.42 38.35 17439.05 100 45478.47 86-87 63.16 32941.78 36.84 214.55 100 52156.33 87-88 62.25 37024.96 37.75 22457.66 100 59482.62 88-89 62.31 43582.41 37.69 26365.36 100 69947.77 89-90 66.17 52091.50 33.83 26629.88 100 78721.38 90-91 61.42 54989.97 38.58 34541.68 100 89531.65 91-92 65.35 66029.87 34.65 35017.78 100 101047.65 92-93 67.25 74115.67 32.75 36087.97 100 110203.64 93-94 57.97 75783.90 42.03 54946.07 100 130729.97 94-95 59.42 91316.93 40.58 62362.49 100 153679.42 95-96 66.90 109983.37 33.10 54428.05 100 164411.42 96-97 70.03 126186.70 29.97 54004.03 100 1800.73 97-98 94.46 133547.71 5.54 7828.33 100 141376.04 98-99 59.54 149441.16 40.46 101536.03 100 250977. 99-00 59.78 181272.75 40.22 1244.14 100 303216.89 2000-01 62.97 2741.63 37.03 113358.63 100 306100.26 2001-02 71.06 201612.37 28.94 82078.05 100 283690.42 2002-03 65.02 232213.26 34.98 124918.45 100 357131.71 2003-04 72.61 264783.00 27.39 99851.77 100 364634.77 2004-05 65.33 304692.41 34.67 161676.46 100 466368.87 2005-06 80.60 348002.98.40 83760. 100 431763.17 2006-07 80.53 434091.61.47 104913.08 100 539004.69 2007-08 (R.E.) 75.27 524889.68 23.42 160585.80 100 685475.48 * Excludes self-balancing item and states share in central taxes. ** Excludes states share against small savings collections from 97-98 onwards. Source: Computed on the basis of the data compiled from various issues of Indian Public Finance Statistics. 115

Survey, 86-87). Consequently, there was a rapid increase in the total receipts of the central government i.e., from Rs. 18791.83 crore in 80-81 to Rs. 78721.38 crore in 89-90 recorded the growth of 16 per cent per annum during the period of fifteen years up to 90. Total receipts of the central government increased from Rs. 101047.65 crore in 91-92 and to Rs. 1800.73 crore in 96-97. It was due to the reforms undertaken by the central government in the tax system which included introduction of presumptive tax (lump-sum) for small traders, retailers and small road transport, strengthening of the incentive structure for savings in the form of financial asset, raising of the initial exemption limit for levy of income tax, reduction of import duties, switchover from specific to uniform ad valorem rates, introduction of service tax (Economic Survey, 95-96). Further, there was reduction in the total receipts of the central government in 97-98 to Rs. 141376.04 crore. Most important factor of this deterioration was major shortfalls in tax collections and disinvestment receipts (Economic Survey, 97-98). Total receipts further showed an increasing trend and reached to the line of Rs. 431763.17 crore in 2005-06 registering the growth of 12 per cent per annum in the post-reform period. It was Rs. 685475.48 crore in 2007-08 (R.E.). Along with the increase in total receipts of the central government, the revenue receipts of the central government have also witnessed a sharp rise. Such receipts stepped up 116

800000 Graph 5.1: Trends in Revenue, Capital and Total Receipts of the Central Government of India 700000 600000 Rs. crore 500000 400000 300000 200000 100000 0 75-76 77-78 79-80 81-82 83-84 85-86 Pre-reform period 87-88 89-90 91-92 93-94 95-96 97-98 99-00 2001-02 2003-04 2005-06 Post-reform period 2007-08 Revenue Receipts Capital Receipts Total Receipts Source: Computed on the basis of data compiled from various issues of Indian Public Finance Statistics. from Rs. 7848.64 crore in 75-76 to Rs. 52091.5 crore in 89-90 showing the growth of 15 per cent per annum during pre-reform period. It constituted 74.66 per cent in 75-76 of the total receipts of the central government (as shown in Graph 5.2). This percentage rose to 77.6 per cent in 77-78. This was mainly due to increase in taxes on income, interest receipts and receipts from general services (Report on Currency and Finance, 77-78). The government undertook various policy initiatives to raise revenue which included an overhaul of the excise tax structure through the introduction of Modified Value Added Tax (MODVAT), the launching of a simpler and more growth-oriented scheme of excise duty concessions for small 117

scale units, simplification and rationalizations of taxation provisions relating to gifts and capital gains, and systematic steps to curb tax evasion (Economic Survey, 86-87). Despite these fiscal policy initiatives taken by the Table 5.2: Compound Growth Rates of Receipts of the Central Government of India and its Components (per cent) Year 75-76 to 89-90 90-91 to 2005-06 91-92 to 2005-06 75-76 to 2005-06 Total Receipts 16 11 12 14 (i) Revenue 15 11 13 14 Receipts (ii) Capital Receipts 20 9 10 14 Note: As in Table 4.2. Source: Computed on the basis of data compiled from various issues of Indian Public Finance Statistics. government, the share of revenue receipts declined and reached to the level of 62.31 per cent in 88-89. The fiscal situation had assumed a crisis by the beginning of the fiscal year 91-92. To cope with the situation the government aimed at augmenting revenue and a number of measures targeting tax revenue were announced in 91-92. These included the announcement of the Voluntary Deposits Scheme, reduction of rate of tax on dividend income received from such investment, extension of the scheme of tax deduction at source, limiting the ad-valorem rates of custom duty, rationalization of 118

auxiliary duties, and raising of special excise duty (Economic Survey, 91-92). As a result of which there was substantial increase in revenue receipts of the central government. These receipts stepped up to Rs. 201612.37 crore in 2001-02 from Rs. 66029.87 crore in 91-92. But the proposals in the budget 91-92 relating to reforms of excise and customs duties were revenue-negative as the share of revenue receipts declined in total receipts of the central government. The share of revenue receipts was 61.42 per cent in 90-91 which improved to 65.35 per cent and 67.25 per cent in the next two years as an immediate result of tax reforms but declined to 59.42 per cent in 94-95. Again as a result of large number of reforms in this front, it rose to 70.03 per cent in 96-97. Thereafter, reduction in personal and corporate tax rates have brought Graph 5.2: Share of Revenue and Capital Receipts in Total Receipts of the Central Government of India As per cent of Total 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 22.40 25.34 26.40 38.06 37.75 34.65 32.46 77.60 67.54 73.60 74.66 38.35 33.83 62.25 66.17 61.65 61.94 65.35 5.54.40 40.22 27.39 23.42 33.10 42.03 94.46 66.9 57.97 28.94 75.27 71.06 80.6 59.78 72.61 0 75-76 77-78 79-80 81-82 83-84 85-86 87-88 89-90 91-92 93-94 95-96 97-98 99-00 20 01-02 20 03-04 20 05-06 20 07-08 Pre-reform period Post-reform period Revenue Receipts Capital Receipts Source: Computed on the basis of data compiled from various issues of Indian Public Finance Statistics. 1

a substantial increase in the share of revenue receipts in 97-98 which reached to the highest level of 94.46 per cent of total receipts of the centre during the study period. A number of remedial measures were further undertaken in the regime of taxation which included reduction in the peak rates of custom duties, rectifying anomalies like inverted duty structure, rationalizing excise duties with a movement towards a median CENVAT rate and relying on voluntary tax compliance through tax payer. All these steps or we can say these tax reforms taken by the central government could not help to maintain such a higher share of revenue receipts of the central government. Since 98-99, it has been fluctuating between 60 to 80 per cent. Further, capital receipts of the central government increased from Rs. 3965.60 crore in 79-80 to Rs. 7275.43 crore in 81-82 mainly on account of larger market borrowings, state and public provident funds and receipts under the Special Bearer Bonds Scheme (Economic Survey, 81-82). It further moved up to Rs. 26629.88 crore in 89-90 which consisted of 25.34 per cent of the total receipts of the central government in the year 75-76. This percentage rose to 38.06 per cent in 83-84 and further declined to 33.83 per cent in 89-90. During post-reform period, it increased from Rs. 35017.78 crore in 91-92 to Rs. 161676.46 crore in 2004-05. The sharp decline in capital receipts to Rs. 83760. crore in 2005-06 was mainly on account of the discontinuance of the debt swap 120

scheme (Economic Survey, 2005-06). It shows the growth of 10 per cent per annum. Looking at capital receipts as a proportion of total receipts of the central government, the share of capital receipts showed a fluctuating trend. It was 38.58 per cent in 90-91 and declined during next two years but again was as much as 42.03 per cent in 93-94. A sharp decline in the share of capital receipts to 5.54 per cent in 97-98 was due to decline in state provident funds, special securities and miscellaneous capital receipts. It rose to the level of 34.98 per cent in 2002-03 but declined to.47 per cent in 2006-07 of total receipts. Conclusively, the revenue receipts as well as capital receipts of the central government have registered a similar trend of increase (14 per cent per annum) throughout the study period. Revenue receipts recorded lower growth (15 per cent per annum) as compared to the capital receipts during the fifteen years up to 89-90 (20 per cent per annum). But the rate of growth of revenue receipts (13 per cent per annum) was higher than the rate of growth of capital receipts in the post-reform period (10 per cent per annum). So lot needs to be done to reduce the burden of borrowings and improve the quality of capital receipts. After analyzing the relative shares of revenue and capital receipts in total receipts of the central government, it is important to analyze total receipts and receipts on both accounts of the central government as per cent of GDP. 121

Table 5.3 exhibits total receipts of the central government as per cent of GDP. As a proportion of GDP, total receipts of the central government, comprising of revenue and capital receipts, had risen from 11.9 per cent in 77-78 to 16.14 per cent in 89-90 due to large number of reforms to raise revenues. Despite numerous measures initiated by the government, there was a disquieting picture of shortfalls in revenue. Even during the post-reform period, it has shown a declining trend and reached to 12.06 per cent of GDP in 2005-06 from 15.43 per cent of GDP in 91-92. Revenue receipts as per cent of GDP were 9.31 per cent in 75-76, which could be increased to 10.68 per cent only (by 1.37 percentage points) in 89-90 (as shown in Graph 5.3). Reduction in the number of slabs of personal income tax (Economic Survey, 85-86), introduction of MODVAT (Economic Survey, 86-87), rationalization of customs and excise duties (Economic Survey, 87-88) and enactment of Direct Tax Laws Bill (Economic Survey, 89-90) were the major measures undertaken by the government. No doubt, the main objective of the measures was to simplify the tax structure, establish a regime of reasonable tax rates combined with better administration to raise revenue. Revenue receipts as per cent of GDP had not grown significantly. During the post-reform period too, no improvement has been seen as revenue receipts as per cent of GDP has gone down from 10.09 per cent in 91-92 to 122

Table 5.3: Total Receipts of the Central Government of India as per cent of GDP Year Revenue Receipts Capital Receipts Total Receipts 75-76 9.31 3.16 12.47 76-77 9.40 4.02 13.42 77-78 9.23 2.67 11.90 78-79 9.87 3.77 13.64 79-80 9.05 3.24 12.29 80-81 8.58 4.34 12.92 81-82 8.87 4.26 13.13 82-83 9.16 4.76 13.92 83-84 8.87 5.44 14.31 84-85 9.47 5.63 15.10 85-86 9.97 6.20 16.17 86-87 10.44 6.10 16.54 87-88 10.36 6.27 16.63 88-89 10.25 6.21 16.46 89-90 10.68 5.46 16.14 90-91 9.65 6.06 15.71 91-92 10.09 5.34 15.43 92-93 9.84 4.79 14.63 93-94 8.74 6.34 15.08 94-95 8.98 6.14 15.12 95-96 9.23 4.57 13.80 96-97 9.15 3.92 13.07 97-98 8.75 0.46 9.21 98-99 9.53 5.80 15.33 99-00 9.29 6.25 15.54 2000-01 9.17 5.39 14.56 2001-02 8.85 3.60 12.45 2002-03 9.46 5.09 14.55 2003-04 9.61 3.63 13.24 2004-05 9.67 5.13 14.8 2005-06 9.72 2.34 12.06 2006-07 10.50 2.53 13.03 2007-08 (R.E.) 11.10 3.39 14.49 Source: Computed on the basis of the data compiled from various issues of Indian Public Finance Statistics. 123

8.85 per cent in 2001-02. It may be noted here that the result of the introduction of and additional refinements to MODVAT has resulted in reduction in the revenue receipts of the central government. Further, this ratio stepped up and reached at 9.72 per cent in 2005-06. This growth was due to the revenue led strategy of the government for achieving the targets set under the FRBM Act, 2003 and the rules made there under (Economic Survey, 2005-06). Thereafter, a slight improvement in the revenue receipts GDP ratio owes to the macro-economic policy frame in 2007-08 which facilitated the implementation of some of the Graph 5.3: Revenue, Capital and Total Receipts of the Central Government of India as per cent of GDP 18 16 14 As per cent of GDP 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 75-76 77-78 79-80 81-82 83-84 85-86 87-88 89-90 Pre-reform period 91-92 93-94 95-96 97-98 99-00 Post-reform period 2001-02 2003-04 2005-06 2007-08 Revenue Receipts Capital Receipts Total Receipts Source: Computed on the basis of data compiled from various issues of Indian Public Finance Statistics. key points in the fiscal reform agenda included those articulated in the Kelkar Task Force Reports on direct and indirect taxes (Economic Survey, 2008-09). 124

Capital receipts of the central government have shown fluctuations during 75-76 to 2007-08 (R.E.). It was 3.16 per cent of GDP in 75-76, to 5.44 per cent of GDP in 83-84 and reached to 6.21 per cent of GDP in 88-89. During 90s, it dipped to 0.46 per cent of GDP in 97-98 from 6.06 per cent of GDP in 90-91 due to decline in state provident funds, special securities and miscellaneous capital receipts. Further, it went up to the level of 5.13 per cent of GDP in 2004-05. It may thus be concluded that the position regarding the share of revenue receipts as per cent of GDP has remained almost same in the pre as well as post-reform period. Composition of Revenue Receipts Revenue receipts are classified under two heads: tax revenue and non-tax revenue. Tax revenue has always occupied a dominant place in the revenue receipts of the government. It accrues to the government through a variety of taxes imposed by it like corporation tax, income tax, custom duties and excise duties. The total collection of some of these taxes is shared with the states by the central government. The principal components of non-tax revenue are net contributions of public sector undertakings, interest receipts, fiscal services, general services, social and community services, economic services and external grants. 125

Looking at the share of tax revenue and non-tax revenue of the centre, it is found that the main source of revenue of the central government is tax revenue which remained 70 to 80 per cent of the total revenue receipts throughout the study period (Graph 5.4). This is mainly due to indirect taxes which occupy a dominant place in central finances. The table clearly shows that there has been a rapid increase in the tax revenue of the central government from Rs. 6009.77 crore in 75-76 to Rs. 38403.99 crore in 89-90 which recorded the growth of 15 per cent during pre-reform period (Table 5.4 and Table 5.5). Firstly, it was due to higher collections from union excise duties, custom duty and corporation tax (Economic Survey, 83-84; Report on Currency and Finance, 84-85). Secondly, it was due to improvement in the share of direct taxes in total tax receipts of the centre (Report on Currency and Finance, 88-89). Tax revenue was 76.57 per cent in 75-76 and stood at 74.59 per cent and 77.57 per cent in 82-83 and 88-89, respectively. Tax measures initiated since 91 targeted in the substantial growth in tax revenue and also to help in improving structural imbalances and anomalies. These measures included drastic cut in the number of end use notifications in regard to excise and customs, a significant switchover from specific to ad valorem duties to strengthen built-in-revenue elasticity, extension of MODVAT, removal of distinction between closely and widely held domestic 126

Table 5.4: Share of Tax and Non-Tax Revenue in Total Revenue Receipts of the Central Government of India (As per cent of Total) Year Tax Revenue* Non-Tax Revenue Total Revenue Receipts 75-76 76.57 23.43 100 76-77 76.98 23.02 100 77-78 74.24 25.76 100 78-79 77.95 22.05 100 79-80 77.59 22.41 100 80-81 75.21 24.79 100 81-82 76.46 23.54 100 82-83 74.59 25.41 100 83-84 78.50 21.50 100 84-85 75.14 24.86 100 85-86 75.53 24.47 100 86-87 73.96 26.04 100 87-88 75.81 24. 100 88-89 77.57 22.43 100 89-90 73.72 26.28 100 90-91 78.27 21.73 100 91-92 75.97 24.03 100 92-93 73.01 26.99 100 93-94 70.60 29.40 100 94-95 73.87 26.13 100 95-96 74.50 25.50 100 96-97 74.28 25.72 100 97-98 71.64 28.36 100 98-99 70.03 29.97 100 99-00 70.76 29.24 100 2000-01 70.90 29.10 100 2001-02 66.29 33.71 100 2002-03 68.65 31.35 100 2003-04 70.62 29.38 100 2004-05 73.77 26.23 100 2005-06 77.66 22.34 100 2006-07 80.90.10 100 2007-08 (R.E.) 82.26 17.74 100 * Includes UT Taxes assigned to local bodies. Note: Article 270 of the Constitution, has been retrospectively amended with effect from 1 st April, 96. Under the provisions of the Constitution (80 th Amendment) Act, 2000, prescribed share of States in the net proceeds of specified central taxes and duties is not form part of the Consolidated Fund of India. Source: Computed on the basis of the data compiled from various issues of Indian Public Finance Statistics. 127

companies and introduction of service tax on the basis of recommendations of Tax Reforms Committee, 91 (Economic Survey, 94-95). Consequently, tax revenue rose to Rs. 136658.56 crore in 2000-01 from Rs. 43041.7 crore in 90-91. In 2001-02, it fell to Rs. 133661.72 crore. This unsatisfactory performance of tax revenue have to be viewed in the backdrop of fiscal measures which aimed at reducing the tax incidence through abolition of surcharges on direct taxes and customs in particular and also raise rationalization and reduction in excise as well to stimulate growth (Economic Survey, 2001-02). Further, some important fiscal measures were taken which included: reducing the peak rates of customs duties, rectifying anomalies like inverted duty structure, rationalizing excise duties with a movement towards a median CENVAT rate Table 5.5: Compound Growth Rates of Tax and Non-Tax Revenue of the Central Government of India (per cent) Year 75-76 to 90-91 to 91-92 to 75-76 to 89-90 2005-06 2005-06 2005-06 Tax 15 11 12 14 Revenue Non-Tax Revenue 15 12 13 15 Note: As in Table 4.2. Source: Computed on the basis of data compiled from various issues of Indian Public Finance Statistics. and revisiting the tax exemptions (Economic Survey, 2006-07). As a result, tax revenue increased to Rs. 431773 crore in 2007-08 (R.E.) recorded the growth of 11 per cent per 128

annum from 90-91 to 2005-06 and 12 per cent per annum from 91-92 to 2005-06. As a proportion of total revenue receipts, tax revenue declined from 78.27 per cent in 90-91 to 70.9 per cent in 2000-01. Such decrease was mainly imputable to the reduction of customs duty provided by the tax reforms to improve both resource allocation and efficiency and to make Indian manufacturing competitive As per cent of Total 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 Graph 5.4: Share of Tax and Non-Tax Revenue in Total Revenue Receipts of the Central Government of India 21.50 23.43 24.03 17.74 29.24 25.76 23.54 24.47 26.28 29.4 28.36 22.34 33.71 22.41 24. 25.50 29.38 82.26 74.24 76.46 73.72 77.66 71.64 76.57 77.59 78.5 75.81 75.97 74.50 70.76 70.62 75.53 70.60 66.29 10 0 75-76 77-78 79-80 81-82 83-84 85-86 87-88 89-90 91-92 93-94 95-96 97-98 99-00 20 01-02 20 03-04 20 05-06 20 07-08 Pre-reform period Post-reform period Tax Revenue Non-Tax Revenue Source: Computed on the basis of the data compiled from various issues of Indian Public Finance Statistics. (Bernardi and Fraschini, 2005). However, the share of tax revenue declined by about 4.61 per cent in 2001-02, because of the general slow down in the economy and particularly in the industrial sectors (Economic Survey, 2001-02). The enactment of the FRBM Act, 2003 and its revenue led strategy has resulted in rise in the share of tax revenue to 82.26 per cent in 2007-08 (R.E.). 129

Further, non-tax revenue was gone up from Rs. 1838.87 crore in 75-76 to Rs. 4447.94 crore in 82-83 largely on account of a considerable increase in the internal resources of the centre s public undertakings for the plan (Economic Survey, 82-83). Non-tax revenue also recorded a rise from Rs. 5852.97 crore in 84-85 to Rs. 13687.51 crore in 89-90 registered the growth of 15 per cent per annum during the pre-reform period of fifteen years. The major contributory factors were interest receipts, fiscal services, general services, economic services (Report on Currency and Finance, 88-89). The relative share of nontax revenue remained between 21 per cent to 26 per cent in the pre-reform period. During the post-reform period 91-92 to 2005-06, it registered the growth of 13 per cent per annum (from Rs. 15865.50 crore to Rs. 77738.75 crore) as compared to 15 per cent per annum in the pre-reform period. As a proportion of total revenue receipts, it hovered between 25 to 30 per cent and even reached at 33.7 per cent in 2001-02. Thereafter, it started declining and reached to 17.74 per cent in 2007-08 (R.E.). This decline in relative share of non-tax revenue was mainly due to reduction in interest receipts, debt swap scheme and a softening interest rate regime (Report of Twelfth Finance Commission, 2005-10). Another reason for such decline was that the central government did not pay proper attention to non-tax reforms for revenue generation. This issue was raised in the Ninth Five Year Plan when it observed, Sufficient attention has 130

not been paid to realization of non-tax revenues. Areas from where non-tax revenues can be augmented are irrigation charges, royalties on minerals and revision of user charges on services rendered by the government. The findings of the study reveal that tax revenue as well as non-tax revenue has grown at the same rate of 15 per cent per annum in the pre-reform period and was higher than that of the post-reform period (12 per cent per annum and 13 per cent per annum, respectively). So more efforts need to be made to increase tax as well as non-tax revenue. Table 5.6 reveals the trend in revenue receipts of the centre as percentage of GDP since 75-76. A large proportion of the increase in revenue receipts, which hovered around 8 to 10 per cent of GDP during the study period, is accounted by tax revenue (as shown in Graph 5.5). The tax-gdp ratio indicates the percentage of national income that is compulsorily transferred from private pockets to public exchequer, and it contributes a major share of government in the disposition of national income. This ratio, thus, signifies the economic role of a government in the national economy. The tax-gdp ratio has hovered around 6 to 7 per cent during pre-reform period. During post-reform period, the tax-gdp ratio of the centre declined from 7.67 per cent in 91-92 to 5.87 per cent in 2001-02. The major factor to this decline was reduction in customs duty which was due to a phased reduction in import duty rates in the wake of commitments to the World Trade Organization (Srivastava, 2005). Secondly, a lower improvement in the tax-gdp ratio 131

Table 5.6: Total Revenue Receipts of the Central Government of India as per cent of GDP Year Tax Revenue Non-Tax Revenue 75-76 7.13 2.18 9.31 76-77 7.23 2.17 9.40 77-78 6.85 2.38 9.23 78-79 7.70 2.17 9.87 79-80 7.01 2.04 9.05 80-81 6.46 2.12 8.58 81-82 6.78 2.09 8.87 82-83 6.83 2.33 9.16 83-84 6.96 1.91 8.87 84-85 7.13 2.34 9.47 85-86 7.53 2.44 9.97 86-87 7.72 2.72 10.44 87-88 7.84 2.52 10.36 88-89 7.96 2.29 10.25 89-90 7.87 2.81 10.68 90-91 7.55 2.10 9.65 91-92 7.67 2.42 10.09 92-93 7.18 2.66 9.84 93-94 6.18 2.56 8.74 94-95 6.63 2.35 8.98 95-96 6.86 2.37 9.23 96-97 6.80 2.35 9.15 97-98 6.26 2.49 8.75 98-99 5.97 2.56 8.53 99-00 6.57 2.72 9.29 2000-01 6.50 2.66 9.16 2001-02 5.87 2.98 8.85 2002-03 6.50 2.97 9.47 2003-04 6.79 2.82 9.61 2004-05 7.14 2.53 9.67 2005-06 7.54 2.17 9.71 2006-07 8.47 2.00 10.47 Total Revenue Receipts 2007-08 (R.E.) 9.14 1.97 11.11 Source: Computed on the basis of the data compiled from various issues of Indian Public Finance Statistics. 132

of the central government was also on account of service sector mostly remaining outside the tax net and its growing importance in the composition of GDP (Economic Survey, 2002-03). Efforts were made to take corrective measures with the introduction of service tax on three services in 94-95 and its extension to 100 services in 2007-08. Consequently, the tax-gdp ratio increased to 9.14 per cent in 2007-08 (R.E.). On the other hand, non-tax revenue as per cent of GDP remained very low i.e., less than 3 per cent in the pre as well as post-reform period. This is because the central government did not pay adequate attention to non-tax sources for revenue generation. The non tax receipts as a Graph 5.5: Tax and Non-Tax Revenue of the Central Government of India as per cent of GDP 12 10 As per cent of GDP 8 6 4 2 0 75-76 78-79 81-82 84-85 87-88 90-91 93-94 96-97 99-00 2002-03 2005-06 2007-08 Pre-reform period Post-reform period Tax Revenue Non-Tax Revenue Total Revenue Receipts Source: Computed on the basis of data compiled from various issues of Indian Public Finance Statistics. 133

percentage of GDP have varied from 2.72 per cent in 99-00 to 2.98 per cent in 2001-02, after which a declining trend is observed, mainly on account of a fall in interest receipts, as a result of the debt-swap scheme and a softening interest rate regime (Report of Twelfth Finance Commission, 2005-10). Non-tax revenue as a percentage of GDP has declined from 2.82 per cent in 2003-04 to 1.97 per cent in 2007-08 (R.E.). This decline is mainly on account of lower interest receipts from the states due to termination of the practice of on-lending to states, and interest relief as a result of the Debt Consolidation and Relief Facility (DCRF) following the recommendations of Twelfth FC (Report of Thirteenth Finance Commission, 2010-15). Composition of Capital Receipts The receipts of the government which create liabilities or reduce financial assets are called capital receipts. The components of capital receipts are market loans, external debt, small savings, state and public provident funds, special deposits of non-government provident funds, special securities and miscellaneous capital receipts. The data contained in Table 5.7 shows the distinctive features of the capital receipts i.e., its changing pattern over a period of time. It exhibits that there has been a wide variation in the market loans as a percentage of total capital receipts. The share of market loans was 17.14 per cent in 75-76, which increased to 40.04 per cent in 81-82 and 134

further came down to 23.1 per cent in 90-91 (as shown in Graph 5.6). In the post-reform period, it was 52.65 per cent in 93-94 and rose to 78.12 per cent in 2002-03 and stood at 64. per cent in 2007-08 (R.E.). Year Table 5.7: Share of Different Components of Capital Receipts in Total Capital Receipts of the Central Government of India (As per cent of Total) Market Loans (net) External Debt (net) Small Savings (net) Provident Funds # Special Securities (net) Misc. Capital Receipts* Total Capital Receipts 75-76 17.14 55.34 14.75 12.67 8.53-8.43 100 78-79 39.31 10.60 20.20 16.37 5.15 8.37 100 81-82 40.04 12.61.23 14.67-0.05 13.50 100 84-85 29.16 9.84 26.00 10.05 2.64 22.30 100 87-88 26.11 14.57 16.20 23.70 4.62 14.80 100 90-91 23.10 10.64 24.10 25.28 0.93 15.95 100 93-94 52.65 8.99 13.00.46 10.40-4.50 100 96-97 35.35 5.53 22.48 16.58-5.94 26.00 100 99-00 57.63 0.97 8.16.20 0.56 13.48 100 2002-03 78.12-9.55 5.38 17.28 0.86 7.91 100 2004-05 31.56 9.12 27.74 6.32-0.30 25.56 100 2007-08 (R.E.) 64. 5.78 11.99 15.09-0.91 3.85 100 #Include state provident funds (net), public provident funds (net) and special deposits of non-government provident funds. *Include net receipts from deposits and advances, bonds issued under voluntary disclosure scheme, special bearer bonds, capital investment bonds, remittances, reserve funds, sales of securities from cash balance investment accounts, contingency fund, deposits from LIC, GIC, special borrowings from RBI against compulsory deposits, etc. Source: Computed on the basis of data compiled from various issues of Indian Public Finance Statistics. The share of external debt in the total capital receipts came down to 10.64 per cent in 90-91 from 55.34 per cent in 75-76. However, it is no longer an important 135

source of finance for the government. The relative share of external loans was 8.99 per cent in 93-94, which came down to 5.78 per cent in 2007-08 (R.E.). The contribution of small savings was 14.75 per cent in 75-76. It went up to 20.2 per cent in 78-79 and rose further to 24.1 per cent in 90-91. During post-reform period, the share of small savings was 13 per cent in 93-94 and rose to the level of 27.74 per cent in 2004-05. Graph 5.6 : Share of Different Components of Capital Receipts in Total Capital Receipts of the Central Government of India 120 As per cent of Total 100 80 60 40 20 0 8.53 12.67 14.75 55.34 17.14-8.43 8.37 5.15 16.37 20.2 10.6 39.31 13.5 14.67.23 12.61 40.04-0.05 22.3 2.64 10.05 26 9.84 29.16 14.8 4.62 23.7 16.2 14.57 10.64 52.65 26.11 15.95 0.93 25.28 24.1 23.1 10.4.46 13 8.99-4.5 26 16.58 22.48 5.53 35.35-5.94 13.48 0.56.2 8.16 0.97 57.63 7.91 0.86 17.28 5.38 78.12-9.55 3.85 25.56 15.09 6.32 27.74 9.12 31.56-0.3 11.99 5.78 64. -0.91-20 75-76 78-79 81-82 84-85 87-88 90-91 93-94 96-97 99-00 2002-03 2004-05 2007-08 Pre-reform period Market Loans Small Savings Special Securities Post-reform period External Debt Provident funds Miscellaneous Capital Receipts Source: Computed on the basis of data compiled from various issues of Indian Public Finance Statistics. Provident funds, as proportion of capital receipts, were 12.67 per cent in 75-76 and increased to 25.28 per cent in 90-91. Its share was.46 per cent in 93-94 which declined to 6.32 per cent in 2004-05 and further increased to 15.09 per cent in 2007-08 (R.E.). 136

The share of special securities in the total capital receipts was 8.53 per cent in 75-76 and declined to 0.93 per cent in 90-91. During 93-94, it was 10.40 per cent in 93-94 and declined to -0.91 per cent in 2007-08 (R.E.). The miscellaneous capital receipts showed a fluctuating trend during the study period. It was -8.43 per cent in 75-76 and reached to 15.95 per cent in 90-91. During post-reform period, it was -4.5 per cent in 93-94 and reached to 3.85 per cent in 2007-08 (R.E.). It may thus be concluded that the share of market loans in total capital receipts is the highest throughout the study period. During 75-76, external debt constituted half of the capital receipts of the central government but thereafter, in the post-reform period, this share has continuously declined and has reached to 5 per cent only. This changing profile of capital receipts also had adverse impact on the government finances, as both market borrowing and small savings are more expensive sources of capital receipts and invariably lead to higher interest burden in future (Sinha and Pant, 2004). In the end, it may thus be concluded that total receipts, revenue receipts as well as capital receipts of the central government have grown at the rate of 14 per cent per annum throughout the study period. But the reform measures undertaken by the central government have not resulted into significant improvement in the revenue receipts as the growth of revenue receipts in the post-reform 137

period remained less than the pre-reform period. Whereas capital receipts recorded a lower growth in the post-reform period as compared to the pre-reform period. While studying the share of revenue and capital receipts in total receipts of the central government, it has been observed that for most of time, the share of revenue receipts has remained more than 60 per cent per annum. The share of revenue receipts as per cent of GDP has remained same in the pre and postreform period indicating quite clearly that no significant improvement could be achieved despite a long list of tax reforms undertaken by the central government to augment revenue. On the other hand, capital receipts have hovered between 2 to 6 per cent of GDP during the study period. Further, tax measures initiated by the central government since 91 have not resulted in substantial growth in tax revenue as compared to the pre-reform period. Similarly, non-tax revenue has registered high rate of growth in the pre-reform period than the post-reform period. This was due to the less attention paid by the central government to non-tax reforms for revenue generation. Looking at the share of tax and non-tax revenue, it is found that the main source of revenue of the central government is tax revenue which remained between 70 to 80 per cent of the total revenue receipts throughout the study period. Tax- GDP ratio has hovered around 6 to 7 per cent during pre as well as post-reform period. During the post-reform period, the tax-gdp ratio increased to 9 per cent in 2007-08. On 138

the other hand, non-tax revenue as per cent of GDP remained between less than 3 per cent in the pre as well as post-reform period. The analysis of capital receipts shows that the share of market loans is the highest throughout the study period. On the other hand, external debt has no longer an important source of financing for the government. The share of small savings has declined. This changing profile of capital receipts had adverse impact on the finances of the government, as market loans are an expensive source of capital receipts and individually led to higher interest burden. 139