Subject: City of St. Louis Park Beltline Boulevard Station Redevelopment Area Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Review File No.

Similar documents
Community Development Committee

Community Development Committee

Proposed Action/Motion

Community Development Committee

Management Committee Meeting date: March 8, 2017 For the Metropolitan Council meeting of March 22, 2017

LEE COUNTY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ZONING DIVISION STAFF REPORT

REGIONAL EVALUATION FRAMEWORK 1.0 INTRODUCTION 2.0 PURPOSE 3.0 DEFINITIONS. Edmonton Metropolitan Region Planning Toolkit

CHAPTER 2 BACKGROUND. Update of Previous Planning Work. Plan Development Process. Public Involvement and Review Process

Metropolitan Council 2013 Operating Budget and Capital Program

Joint Report of the Transportation and Management Committees For the Special Metropolitan Council meeting of May 30, 2018

Chapter 10 Equity and Environmental Justice

Transportation Committee Meeting date: July 24, 2017 For the Metropolitan Council meeting of July 26, 2017

Transportation Planning

Population, Housing, and Employment Methodology

CITY OF VAUGHAN EXTRACT FROM COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 26, 2017

3 YORK REGION 2031 POPULATION AND EMPLOYMENT FORECASTS

ECONOMIC ISSUES AND OPPORTUNITIES PAPER

CITY OF RAMSEY PRELIMINARY WORK PLAN FOR: 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE (DETAILED WORK PLANS TO BE DEVELOPED IN FUTURE STEPS)

CHAPTER I DRAFT 9_26_13 INTRODUCTION TO THE 2030 PLAN

Transportation Committee

Summary of Committee Discussion/Questions Pat Jones, Tom McGannon and Mark Leemon presented and responded to questions.

SOUTHWEST LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT PROJECT (METRO GREEN LINE EXTENSION) Section 106 Memorandum of Agreement

Business Item No

78th OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Regular Session. Enrolled. House Bill 2643

Hemson Growth Forecast / Planning Assumptions for Growth Scenarios Tested

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT

Amend the 2010 Authorized Capital Program (multi-year authorization) by adding spending authority as follows:

Minimum Elements of a Local Comprehensive Plan

Report to: Development Services Committee Date: June 26, 2017

Proposed Franchise Fee Pavement Management Program (PMP)

7:00 p.m th Avenue North COUNCIL WORK SESSION AGENDA #37

SUBJECT: SEE BELOW DATE: November 22, 2016

Statute Requires Development Guide

Transportation Committee Meeting date: January 23, 2017 For the Metropolitan Council meeting of February 8, 2017

5.0 ALTERNATIVES 5.1 OVERVIEW OF ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS

7 ITEM 8 10:20 A.M. January 12, 2006 STAFF REPORT

COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO.

Public Policy Issues and Sustainability in Southern California. Financing Infrastructure Development

FROM: CITY MANAGER DEPARTMENT: PLANNING AND COMMUNITY ENVIRONMENT DATE: SEPTEMBER 11, 2006 CMR: 346:06

Columbia River Crossing Project Vancouver, Washington Engineering (Rating Assigned November 2012)

glenmont sector plan S C O P E O F W O R K J AN U A R Y MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT M-NCPPC MontgomeryPlanning.

Westwood Country Club Redevelopment

The DRAFT Bus and Rail Investment Plan in Orange County

4.3 Economic and Fiscal Impacts

(4) facilities for the furnishing of water, (6) solid waste disposal facilities, (7) qualified residential rental projects,

Township of Georgian Bay Water & Sewer Capacity Allocation Strategy. MacTier. November, Jointly prepared by the

2040 Plan Update. Land Use Advisory Committee March 16, 2017

Management Committee Meeting date: October 25, 2017 For the Metropolitan Council meeting of November 8, 2017

Mid - City Industrial

METRO BLUE LINE EXTENSION LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT PROJECT Section 106 Memorandum of Agreement. Quarterly Report No. 1 (August 24 November 30, 2016)

SOUTHWEST LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT PROJECT (METRO GREEN LINE EXTENSION) Section 106 Memorandum of Agreement. Quarterly Report No. 4 (March 1 May 31, 2017)

STORMWATER MANAGEMENT FUND Department of Environmental Services

2015 Update of Water and Wastewater Impact Fees

Urban Growth Area Review City of Bellingham Preliminary UGA Growth Allocation Proposal

ASSEMBLY, No. 369 STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 218th LEGISLATURE PRE-FILED FOR INTRODUCTION IN THE 2018 SESSION

CITY OF MODESTO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO (HETCH HETCHY) CFD REPORT

GROWTH MANAGEMENT STRATEGY

H U R D D E V E L O P M E N T GRAND AVENUE DEVELOPMENT SITE & G R A N D A V E. D E S M O I N E S, I O W A

PRELIMINARY 2017 Unified Budget & Levies

SUBJECT: Amendment to the Zoning Code to Allow Emergency Shelters as a Permitted Land Use in a Portion of the M-1 Zone (AZ )

City of Excelsior 2018 Budget Presentation. December 4, 2017 City Council Meeting

Business Item

Section II: Overview of the Annual Growth Policy 1. Background

CITY OF PALM DESERT COMPREHENSIVE GENERAL PLAN

ACTION TRANSMITTAL No

2015 Inflationary Adjustment to Development Cost Levy Rates

NORTH WIND CROSSING SHOP SPACE. Odessa, TX 18,000 SF $ SF/yr. Presented By

HEMSON GROWTH FORECAST

SOUTHWEST LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT PROJECT (METRO GREEN LINE EXTENSION) Section 106 Memorandum of Agreement

8.0 FINANCIAL ANALYSIS

Project Plan for the Creation of Tax Incremental District No. 10

Chapter VIII. General Plan Implementation A. INTRODUCTION B. SUBMITTAL AND APPROVAL OF SUBSEQUENT PROJECTS C. SPHERE OF INFLUENCE

Executive Change Control Board. January 15, 2016

Study of the Metropolitan Area Fiscal Disparities Program

City of La Verne. Enhanced Infrastructure Financing District #1. Infrastructure Financing Plan

Business item

Public Works and Development Services

The ROI of increased investment in regional transit. William Schroeer

GRADING CALIFORNIA S RAIL STATION NEIGHBORHOODS

IMPACT OF A SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT

Edward R. Sajecki Commissioner of Planning and Building

Presented By: L. Carson Bise II, AICP President

Policy CIE The following are the minimum acceptable LOS standards to be utilized in planning for capital improvement needs:

PROCEDURE FOR REQUESTING A RIGHT-OF-WAY LICENSE AGREEMENT WITH CAPITAL METRO

Hamilton County, Ohio The Metropolitan Sewer District of Greater Cincinnati Rate Structure and Comparisons. October 21, 2015

City of Lewiston, Maine Advertisement for Request for Proposals Comprehensive Plan Update RFP #: Due Date: October 9, 2012

Market and Financial Inputs to Neighbourhood Centres Policy

County-wide Planning Policies

COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO.

CHAPTER 11: Economic Development and Sustainability

LELAND CONSULTING GROUP

DEVELOPMENT CHARGES BACKGROUND STUDY

Meeting of the Southwest Corridor Management Committee September 11, 2013

2017 WATER AND WASTEWATER IMPACT FEE STUDY CITY OF AZLE, TEXAS

Reasonable Modification from the Planning Code

Big Chino Water Ranch Project Impact Analysis Prescott & Prescott Valley, Arizona

WRONG-WAY STREET: REVERSING THE SUBSIDY FLOWING FROM LOW-INCOME CUSTOMERS IN A COMPETITIVE ELECTRIC INDUSTRY. By:

DEVELOPMENT CHARGES BACKGROUND STUDY

DRAFT MEMORANDUM -- For Discussion Purposes Only. James R. Musbach and Garrett K. Gray. Subject: Nevada State College Financing Program; EPS #18067

4.12 POPULATION, HOUSING, AND EMPLOYMENT

Transcription:

Committee Report Business Item No. 2017-54 Community Development Committee For the Metropolitan Council meeting of March 8, 2017 Subject: City of St. Louis Park Beltline Boulevard Station Redevelopment Area Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Review File No. 20619-12 Proposed Action That the Metropolitan Council: 1. Adopt the attached Review Record and allow the City of St. Louis Park to place the Beltline Boulevard Station Redevelopment Area Comprehensive Plan Amendment into effect. 2. Revise the City s forecasts for population and households 2030 and 2040, as shown in Table 2 of the Review Record. 3. Revise the City s allocation of the regional affordable housing need for 2021-2030 as shown in Table 3 of the Review Record. 4. Advise the City to implement the advisory comments in the Review Record for Wastewater, Land Use, and Forecasts. Summary of Committee Discussion/Questions This business item was approved as part of the committee meeting s consent agenda with no questions or discussion. Page - 1

Business Item No. 2017-54 Community Development Committee Meeting date: February 21, 2017 For the Metropolitan Council meeting of March 8, 2017 Subject: City of St. Louis Park Beltline Boulevard Station Redevelopment Area Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Review File No. 20619-12 District(s), Member(s): District 6, Gail Dorfman Policy/Legal Reference: Metropolitan Land Planning Act (Minn. Stat. 473.175) Staff Prepared/Presented: Michael Larson, AICP, Senior Planner, Local Planning Assistance (651-602-1407) Division/Department: Community Development / Regional Planning Proposed Action That the Metropolitan Council: 1. Adopt the attached Review Record and allow the City of St. Louis Park to place the Beltline Boulevard Station Redevelopment Area Comprehensive Plan Amendment into effect. 2. Revise the City s forecasts for population and households 2030 and 2040, as shown in Table 2 of the Review Record. 3. Revise the City s allocation of the regional affordable housing need for 2021-2030 as shown in Table 3 of the Review Record. 4. Advise the City to implement the advisory comments in the Review Record for Wastewater, Land Use, and Forecasts. Background The amendment re-guides approximately 5.21 acres adjacent to the future METRO Green Line Beltline Station from Business Park to Mixed Use. The purpose of the amendment is to accommodate future mixed-use development adjacent to the station. The amendment area includes land controlled by the City s Economic Development Authority and private property that will be acquired by the Metropolitan Council for a park-and-ride. Rationale The proposed amendment conforms to regional system plans, is consistent with Council policies, and is compatible with the plans of other local communities and school districts. Thrive Lens Analysis The proposed amendment is reviewed against the land use policies in Thrive MSP 2040. To achieve the outcomes identified in Thrive, the metropolitan development guide defines the Land Use Policy for the region and includes strategies for local governments and the Council to implement. These policies and strategies are interrelated and, taken together, serve to achieve the outcomes identified in Thrive. Funding None. Known Support / Opposition There is no known local resident or local government opposition to this proposal. Page - 1

Review Record City of St. Louis Park Beltline Boulevard Station Redevelopment Area Comprehensive Plan Amendment Review File No. 20619-12, Council Business Item No. 2017-54 BACKGROUND The City of St. Louis Park is approximately 10.8 square miles, located in Hennepin County. The City is bordered by the City of Minneapolis to the east, Hopkins and Minnetonka to the west, Golden Valley to the north, and Edina to the south. Consistent with the policies adopted by the Council in June 2014 (Business Item 2014-143) regarding review of local comprehensive plans, this amendment is being reviewed under Thrive MSP 2040 and its policy plans. Thrive MSP 2040 (Thrive) designates St. Louis Park as an Urban Center community. Figure 1 shows the general location of St. Louis Park and nearby communities, and the Thrive Community Designation. The Council reviewed the City s Update (Business Item 2009-441, Review File No. 20619-1) on December 9, 2009. This amendment is the City s eleventh since the review of the Update. REQUEST SUMMARY The amendment re-guides approximately 5.21 acres adjacent to the future METRO Green Line Beltline Station from Business Park to Mixed Use. The purpose of the amendment is to accommodate future mixed-use development adjacent to the station. The amendment area includes land controlled by the City s Economic Development Authority and private property that will be acquired by the Metropolitan Council for a park-and-ride. OVERVIEW Conformance with Regional Systems Consistency with Council Policies The amendment conforms to the Regional System Plans for Parks, Transportation (including Aviation), and Wastewater, with no substantial impact on, or departure from, these plans. The amendment is consistent with the Thrive MSP 2040, with the Housing Policy Plan, with water resources management, and is consistent with Council forecasts. Compatibility with Plans of Adjacent Jurisdictions The amendment will not have an impact on adjacent communities, school districts, or watershed districts, and is compatible with the plans of those districts. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTIONS The Council acted on the City s Update on December 9, 2009 (Review File No. 20619-1). The Council administratively approved the City s Galaxy Drive-In Parking Lot Expansion amendment on March 8, 2010 (Review File No. 20619-2). The Council administratively approved the City s Three Sites amendment on April 6, 2010 (Review File No. 20619-3). Page - 1

The Council administratively approved the City s City of St. Louis Park Plan by Neighborhood amendment on June 27, 2012 (Review File No. 20619-4). The Council approved the City s Eliot Park Apartments amendment on April 10, 2013 (Business Item No. 2013-106, Review File No. 20619-5). The Council administratively approved the City s Wooddale Flats amendment on August 27, 2013 (Review File No. 20619-6). The Council approved the City s Highway 7 & Glenhurst amendment on March 25, 2015 (Business Item No. 2015-57, Review File No. 20619-7). The Council administratively approved the City s City of St. Louis Park Flexible Planned Densities amendment on June 5, 2015 (Review File No. 20619-8). The Council approved the City s Bridgewater amendment on August 12, 2015 (Business Item 2015-174, Review File No. 20619-9). The Council administratively approved the City s Arlington Row Apartments West amendment on November 18, 2015 (Review File No. 20619-10). The Council administratively approved the City s Municipal Boundary Adjustment amendment on March 31, 2016 (Review File No. 20619-11). ISSUES I. Does the amendment conform to the regional system plans? II. III. IV. Is the amendment consistent with Thrive MSP 2040 and other Council policies? Does the amendment change the City s forecasts? Is the amendment compatible with the plans of adjacent local governmental units and affected jurisdictions? ISSUES ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS Conformance with Regional Systems The amendment conforms to the regional system plan for Regional Parks, Transportation, and Wastewater, with no substantial impact on, or departure from, these system plans. Additional review comments are included below. Wastewater Reviewer: Roger Janzig (651-602-1119) The proposed amendment conforms to the 2040 Water Resources Policy Plan. The existing Metropolitan Disposal System has adequate capacity for the proposed change in guiding land use. Advisory Comments Metropolitan Council Forcemain Interceptor (7026) runs inside the northern border of this project area. Any future projects may impact the Interceptor. The interceptor was built in 1971 and is a 24-inch Prestressed Concrete Cylinder Pipe (PCCP) at a depth of approximately 7 to 10 feet. To assess the potential impacts to our interceptor system, prior to initiating any future projects, preliminary plans should be sent to Scott Dentz, Interceptor Engineering Manager (651-602-4503) at the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services for review and comment. Page - 2 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL

Consistency with Council Policy The amendment is consistent with Council policies for land use, forecasts, housing, sub-surface sewage treatment systems, and water supply. Additional review comments regarding policy consistency are detailed below. Land Use Reviewer: Michael Larson (651-602-1407) Thrive designates the City as an Urban Center community. Thrive expectations for the overall density of new development and redevelopment in Urban Center communities is a minimum average residential density of 20 dwelling units per acre (du/acre) for new development and redevelopment. The proposed amendment reguides approximately 5.21 acres from Business Park to Mixed Use, which supports residential development at densities from 20 to 50 du/acre. As a result of the amendment, the City s overall planned density increases slightly from 18.5 to 18.6 du/acre, as shown in Table 1 with changes underlined. Table 1. City of St. Louis Park Planned Residential Density 2010-2030 Change Density Range Net Min Max Category Min Max Acres Units Units Medium Density Residential 6 30 4.7 28 140 High Density Residential 20 50+ 9.2 184 459+ Mixed Use 20 50+ 33.9 678 1695+ TOTALS 47.74 890 2294+ Overall Density 18.6 48.1+ While the amendment is consistent, the City s full comprehensive plan does not currently meet the Thrive policy expectation for an average minimum planned density of 20 du/acre in Urban Center communities. However, the community will have an opportunity to adjust guiding densities in its 2040 comprehensive plan update. Recent development, other planning work done by the City, and likely future market conditions all support a higher minimum density in St. Louis Park. Advisory Comments The 2040 Transportation Policy Plan (TPP) establishes policy for the density of residential development near transit stations. The areas addressed by the TPP encompass an area within a ½-mile radius of the station platform. This amendment reguides property within this radius. For light rail transit (LRT) station areas in Urban Center communities, the average minimum planned residential density is 50 du/acre. The City should consider this policy requirement during the update of its comprehensive plan so that overall guiding land use conforms with regional system plans and policy. Making adjustments to planned residential densities within station areas will increase the City s overall planned residential density. The City s comprehensive plan includes policy language allowing development to exceed the maximum density when it meets the City s Livable Communities Principles and other goals of the comprehensive plan. The plan does not establish upper density limits for High Density Residential and Mixed Use categories, and this is represented in Table 2 with plus symbols. This approach was established with the Flexible Planned Densities amendment (Review File 20619-8), which was administratively approved by the Council on June 5, 2015. At that time, the Metropolitan Council advised that a Page - 3 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL

boundless density range does not enable the Council to fully assess the amount of growth that communities may accommodate nor the potential impact on various regional systems. In the City s update, the Council expects the City to guide land uses with density ranges that have upper bounds, even if the upper end of that range is conditioned by local policy performance standards. The Council uses a number of factors to fully consider scenarios that would result in the greatest impact to regional systems. They include maximum residential density, allocation of growth forecasts to Transportation Analysis Zones (TAZs), and identification of redevelopment areas. Forecasts Reviewer: Todd Graham (651-602-1322) The amendment adds housing capacity in the area addressed by the amendment. City staff and Metropolitan Council agree to adjust St. Louis Park s forecasts upward by 200 households and by 500 population for the year 2030 and thereafter, as shown in Table 2 with changes underlined. Table 2. Metropolitan Council Forecasts for the City of St. Louis Park Census Previous Council Forecasts Revised Council Forecasts 2010 2020 2030 2040 2020 2030 2040 Population 45,250 45,250 48,200 49,100 48,200 49,600 51,800 Households 21,743 21,743 23,600 24,600 23,600 24,800 25,700 Employment 40,485 40,485 43,400 45,200 43,400 45,200 46,700 (Note: All of the households and population in St. Louis Park are sewer-serviced.) Advisory Comments The City s allocation of the regional affordable housing need for the decade 2021 to 2030 is based on a formula that includes forecasted growth. Table 3 indicates the change in the City s allocation of affordable housing need as a result of the forecast increase. These new numbers should be addressed in the City s forthcoming comprehensive plan update. Table 3. Allocation of Affordable Housing Need (2021-2030) for the City of St. Louis Park Previous Allocation New Allocation At or Below 30% of Area Median Income (AMI) 191 229 Between 31% and 50% of AMI 110 132 Between 51% and 80% of AMI 65 78 TOTAL 2021-2030 Allocation 366 439 Housing Reviewer: Jonathan Stanley (651-602-1555) The amendment is consistent with the Council s Housing Policy Plan. The City s share of the region s affordable housing need from 2011-2020 is 501 units; and its lifecycle housing goal is 500 to 1000 units. The City already has the capacity in its guided land uses for 2011-2020 to support the housing need and the lifecycle housing goal. By reguiding approximately 5.21 acres from Business Park to Mixed Use, the amendment further increases the amount of land that supports the development of affordable and lifecycle housing. The timing of development in the amendment location is reflected in a forecast change for 2030. Nevertheless, the City now has a total of 43.1 acres guided at densities of at Page - 4 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL

least 20 units per acre. This results in the capacity to support at least 862 new housing units at minimum guided densities. Compatibility with Plans of Adjacent Governmental Units and Plans of Affected Special Districts and School Districts No compatibility issues with plans of adjacent governmental units and plans of affected special districts and school districts were identified. ATTACHMENTS Figure 1: Figure 2: Figure 3: Location Map Showing Community Designations Location Map Showing Regional Systems Guiding Land Use, Existing and Proposed Change Page - 5 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL

Figure 1: Location Map Showing Community Designations Page - 6 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL

Figure 2: Location Map Showing Regional Systems. Page - 7 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL

Figure 3: Guiding Land Use, Existing and Proposed Change Page - 8 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL