Regime-Based Asset Allocation The next step in the evolution of asset allocation Benefits and Pension Summit April 23-24

Similar documents
Correlation and Asset Management

Can We Lower Portfolio Volatility and Still Meet Equity Return Expectations?

Schwab Indexed Retirement Trust Fund 2040

The Myth of Diversification: Risk Factors vs. Asset Classes

The Realities of Diversification

Fund Information. Partnering for Success. SSgA Real-Life Insight

BROAD COMMODITY INDEX

MANAGED FUTURES INDEX

MANAGED FUTURES INDEX

BROAD COMMODITY INDEX

MANAGED FUTURES INDEX

MANAGED FUTURES INDEX

BROAD COMMODITY INDEX

BROAD COMMODITY INDEX

DESIGNED FOR TODAY S AND TOMORROW S INVESTMENT CHALLENGES

Conexus Financial Events Alternatives 6th Annual Conference

Portfolio Strategist Update from The Dreyfus Corporation

How to Think About Correlation Numbers: Long-Term Trends versus Short-Term Noise

PART TWO: PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT HOW EXPOSURE TO REAL ESTATE MAY ENHANCE RETURNS.

MANAGED FUTURES INDEX

MANAGED FUTURES INDEX

Investment Perspectives. From the Global Investment Committee

BROAD COMMODITY INDEX

Risk-Efficient Investment Portfolios from AlphaSimplex Group. Strategies that put risk management first

The Risk in Asset Allocation

10-Year Capital Market Return Assumptions

The Black Widow Returns

Advisor Briefing Why Alternatives?

Is buy-and-hold dead?

A Summary of the Rogers International Commodity Index 3 rd Quarter 2017

Schwab Diversified Growth Allocation Trust Fund (Closed to new investors) Institutional Unit Class As of June 30, 2017

ASSET ALLOCATION REPORT

Please refer to For more information regarding the index. July 2017

Diversified Growth Funds IIES 2017

Graduate Seminar: ETF Advisor Roundtable: Building a Resilient ETF Portfolio

Myths & misconceptions

RBC Strategic Asset Allocation Models

Insights. Pactive Investing

Wealth Management Perspectives

Community Foundation of Northern Virginia - Pooled Investment Fund

Tax-Managed SMAs: Better Than ETFs?

Investing in real assets

University of North Florida Foundation, Inc. Statement of Investment Objectives and Policies

Global Allocation Fund

Target Retirement Performance Update

DWS Enhanced Commodity Strategy Fund

INVEST IN SOMETHING REAL NOT FOR USE IN OHIO.

Designing Outcome-Focused Defined Contribution Plans: Building Sustainable Income for Retirees

Master Limited Partnerships (MLPs)

Investment Perspectives. From the Global Investment Committee

Alternatives in action: A guide to strategies for portfolio diversification

Introducing BlackRock's Target Allocation ETF Models

2014 CAPITAL MARKET ASSUMPTIONS. January SEATTLE LOS ANGELES

Thinking. Alternative. Third Quarter The Role of Alternative Beta Premia

July J.P. Morgan Structured Investments. The J.P. Morgan Efficiente Plus 5 Index (Net ER) Strategy Guide

Reasons to Consider Dividend-Paying Stocks

PROSPECTUS. Initial Public Offering and Continuous Offering February 2, 2018

Building stronger fixed income portfolios

Building Hedge Fund Portfolios Capable of Generating Absolute Return within Stressful Market Environments

80% Equity / 2% Fixed Income / 16% Alternative / 2% Allocation Strategy

Morgan Stanley ETF-MAP 2 Index Information

Schwab Intelligent Portfolios. Investing has changed forever.

White Paper Commodities as a Asset Class

PIMCO Global Optima Index

J.P. Morgan Structured Investments

Income Solutions Beyond Investment Grade Bonds

Premium (Institutional Share Class) Simple. Performance.TM. Wellesley Hills Naples

Global Investment Strategy Report

JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association $6,970,000 Certificates of Deposit Linked to the J.P. Morgan ETF Efficiente DS 5 Index due January 29, 2021

Guide to Managed Futures

Insights. The Opportunity Cost Keeps Growing and Growing. November The opportunity cost keeps growing and growing

Smart Beta Dashboard. Thoughts at a Glance. June By the SPDR Americas Research Team

Smart Beta Dashboard. Thoughts at a Glance. January By the SPDR Americas Research Team

The Impact of Falling Energy Prices

Wealth Management Perspectives

Implications of a Rising Rate Environment

The Case for Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities

Economic Outlook. Presented: April 22, Keith B. Hembre, CFA Chief Economist & Chief Investment Strategist, FAF Advisors.

Alternatives in action: A guide to strategies for portfolio diversification

STATEMENT OF INVESTMENT POLICY. I. Introduction 2. II. Investment Philosophy 2. III. Investment Objectives 2. IV. Investment Policy 3

Trends in Liability Driven Investing CFA Society of Pittsburgh. January 12, Jim Moore

BNP PARIBAS MULTI ASSET DIVERSIFIED 5 INDEX

Wells Fargo Target Date Funds

HSBC Vantage5 Index Methodology Guide

Why and How to Pick Tactical for Your Portfolio

Commentary by Victor Sperandeo April 15, 2013

Constructing Investor Benchmarks for Responsible Investors

Volatility-Managed Strategies

Income Investing basics

85.3% 0.3% 3.3% 6.5% 0.5% 3.4% U.S. PENSION FUNDING UPDATE. U.S. corporate pension funding decreased by 0.3% in December 2017

INVESTMENT PLAN. Sample Client. For. May 04, Prepared by : Sample Advisor Financial Consultant.

Economic and Capital Market Update November 2017

Exchange Traded Fund Strategies

MANAGED FUTURES INDEX

Eaton Vance Commodity Strategy Fund

Brexit and Market Implications Special Commentary & Webinar

COMPARING TIMBERLAND WITH OTHER INFLATION HEDGES. Chung-Hong Fu, Ph.D., Managing Director

Economic and Capital Market Update April 2018

PROSPECTUS. Continuous Offering January 29, 2016

Changing interest rates THE IMPACT ON YOUR PORTFOLIO

Transcription:

Regime-Based Asset Allocation The next step in the evolution of asset allocation Benefits and Pension Summit April 23-24 Rumi Masih Managing Director and Senior Investment Strategist Investment Strategy and Solutions Group BNY Mellon Asset Management Presented by and through BNY Mellon Asset Management Canada, Ltd., a registered portfolio manager and exempt market dealer. Important Information The views in this presentation are provided by the Investment Strategy & Solutions Group ( ISSG ). Investment Strategy and Solutions Group ( ISSG ) is part of The Bank of New York Mellon ( Bank ). ISSG offers products and services through the Bank, including investment strategies that are developed by affiliated BNY Mellon Asset Management investment advisory firms and managed by officers of such affiliated firms acting in their capacities as dual officers of the Bank. BNY Mellon Asset Management is one of the world s leading investment management organizations, encompassing BNY Mellon s affiliated investment management firms and global distribution companies. BNY Mellon is the corporate brand of The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation. Unless noted otherwise, the Bank and the affiliated investment advisory firms are wholly-owned subsidiaries of The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation. Use of BNY Mellon and BNY Mellon Asset Management may refer to the Bank and/or its affiliated investment advisory firms. HYPOTHETICAL OR SIMULATED PERFORMANCE RESULTS HAVE CERTAIN INHERENT LIMITATIONS. UNLIKE AN ACTUAL PERFORMANCE RECORD, SIMULATED RESULTS DO NOT REPRESENT ACTUAL TRADING. SIMULATED TRADING PROGRAMS IN GENERAL ARE ALSO SUBJECT TO THE FACT THAT THEY ARE DESIGNED WITH THE BENEFIT OF HINDSIGHT. ALSO, SINCE THE TRADES HAVE NOT ACTUALLY BEEN EXECUTED, THE RESULTS MAY HAVE UNDER OR OVER COMPENSATED FOR THE IMPACT OF CERTAIN MARKET FACTORS. IN ADDITION, HYPOTHETICAL TRADING DOES NOT INVOLVE FINANCIAL RISK. NO HYPOTHETICAL TRADING RECORD CAN COMPLETELY ACCOUNT FOR THE IMPACT OF FINANCIAL RISK IN ACTUAL TRADING. FOR EXAMPLE, THE ABILITY TO WITHSTAND LOSSES OR TO ADHERE TO A PARTICULAR TRADING PROGRAM IN SPITE OF THE TRADING LOSSES ARE MATERIAL FACTORS WHICH CAN ADVERSELY AFFECT THE ACTUAL TRADING RESULTS. THERE ARE NUMEROUS OTHER FACTORS RELATED TO THE ECONOMY OR MARKETS IN GENERAL OR TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ANY SPECIFIC TRADING PROGRAM WHICH CANNOT BE FULLY ACCOUNTED FOR IN THE PREPARATION OF HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS, ALL OF WHICH CAN ADVERSELY AFFECT TRADING RESULTS. 2

Agenda 1. The path toward regime-based asset allocation 2. Regime dynamics and asset class behavior 3. Constructing portfolios in response to changes in macroeconomic expectations 3 The march towards Regime-Based Asset Allocation Old School Rise of Alts Transition to Macro Stocks Bonds Cash Stocks Bonds Alternatives Growth assets Inflation hedge? Deflation hedge 4

Asset classes and portfolio roles should be used in tandem Growth Inflation Deflation es Traditional Asset Class U.S. Int'l Energy Utilities EM Treasuries Fixed Income Alternatives High Yield TIPS Sovereign Debt High Quality Corp. Private Real Estate Specialty HF Commodities Long biased HF Real Assets Interest trt Rate Products 5 A further refinement of the bucketing system Goldilocks economics is too simplistic Just Right Too Cold Too Hot A richer framework Rising Growth Perfection Warming Falling Inflation Cooling Too Cold Too Hot Rising Inflation Falling Growth 6

Revisions in inflation expectations explain bond returns better than levels of inflation n in Forecast flation Revision In -6% -4% -2% 2% 4% 6% Revision in Inflation Forecast versus Bond Market Performance 45% 3 15% -15% -3 Real Retu urn of 10-Year Trea aury Bond 12M Revision in Forecast Inflation Rolling 12 Month Real Return 10-Year Treasury Forecast Inf flation 1 8% 6% 4% 2% Forecast Inflation versus Bond Market Performance 4 3 2 1-1 Treasury Return 10-Year Bond Forecast Inflation 2 Mth Return 10-Year Treasury Bond 7 Revisions in growth expectations explain stock returns better than forecast GDP growth orecast GDP wth Revision in Fo Grow 8% 4% -4% -8% Revision in Growth Forecast versus Stock Market Performance 12M GDP Revisions Rolling 12 Month S&P Return 6 3-3 -6 S&P 500 Return Forecast Re eal GDP 8% 6% 4% 2% -2% -4% Forecast Growth versus Stock Market Performance 6 4 2-2 -4-6 Return S& &P 500 Forecast Real GDP Rolling 12 M S&P Return 8

Revisions in Inflation and growth expectations combine to create regimes 8% Revisions to Inflation and Growth Expectations 6% sions Rolling 12 Month Revis 4% 2% -2% -4% -6% -8% -1 Revisions to Inflation Expectations Revisions to Growth Expectations. Source: Philadelphia Federal Reserve as of 2/29/2012. 9 Regimes do not occur in cycles The conventional image 40 years of regime transitions Too Hot Too Hot Warming Perfection Warming Cooling Cooling Too Cold Too Cold 10

Regime lengths have varied 40 Regime Lengths ths Number of Mont 30 20 10 The Too Cold regimes have been shorter than others likely due to Fed action. 0 Perfection Warming Cooling Too Hot Too Cold Shaded area represents the average regime length 11 U.S. Stock market performance varied by regime Regime Inflation Growth Frequency Real Return Contribution to Return Too Hot Rising Falling 11% 5.9% 0.7% Too Cold Falling Negative 7% 21.6% 1.5% Cooling Falling Falling 2 12. 2.4% Warming Steady/Rising Steady/Rising 46% 7.5% 3.4% Perfection Falling Rising 16% 14.6% 2.3% Total 10 6. 6. Source: Ibbotson, Bloomberg. As of 8/31/2011. Returns calculated using the regimes outlined on slide 19 Please see appendix for index descriptions. 12

Asset performance varied by regime 3 Average Asset Class Performance by Regime 2 Average Real Return 1-1 -2-3 Ordered by yperformance in Perfection Regime -4 Perfection Warming Cooling Too Hot Too Cold Refer to addendum for additional information and sources. See appendix for index descriptions and time periods. 13 Canadian equities suffered during Too Hot regimes 2 Average Asset Class Performance by Regime 1 Average Real Return -1-2 -3 Ordered d by performance in Perfection Regime. -4 Warming Perfection Cooling Too Hot Too Cold Refer to addendum for additional information and sources. See appendix for index descriptions and time periods. 14

Our view of likely out performing asset classes by regime Growth Inflation Deflation Perfection Warming Cooling Too Hot Too Cold Equities (led by consumer &tech sectors) U.S., Int l and EM Nat. Resource EM Energy & Industrial Sectors EM Energy Stocks Utilities Stocks Nat. Resource Energy Stocks Utilities & Health Care Sectors Fixed Income High Yield Investment Grade Inflation-Linked High Yield Treasuries Global Bonds Corporate Bonds US TIPS Global Linkers Treasuries Global Bonds Ultra High Quality Corp. Cash Alternatives Private Long-biased HF Real Estate Real Estate Commodities Infrastructure Real Assets Private Real Estate Private Commodities Oil Gold Specialty HFs Interest Rate Products Gold 15 Regime specific portfolios have very different allocations Precious Metals Oil Natural Resource Energy Stocks U.S. TIPS Private Corporate Bonds Real Estate U.S. Commodities Global Linkers Utility Equities Cash High Quality Corporate Bonds Healthcare Equities High Yield Bonds EM Int'l Global Sovereigns U.S. Treasuries Int'l U.S. Treasuries EM U.S. U.S. TIPS High Yield Bonds U.S. Private Real Estate EM Precious Metals Private Real Assets Too Hot Too Cold Warming Cooling Perfection Commodities Real Estate Int'l 16

Awareness of regimes can lead to better performance We believe: 1. Insight into regime probabilities should lead to better performance. 2. A regime based asset allocation framework requires a systematic approach to estimating regime probabilities. 3. The estimated probabilities can be used to dynamically adjust portfolio exposures.. For more information please see ISSG s paper entitled Great Expectations. 17 Estimating probabilities of regimes. * Multinomial logistic regression models are typically used to predict the probabilities of different possible outcomes of a predefined, dependent variable, given a set of independent variables. 18

Constructing a dynamic RBAA strategy Strategy Over/Under Weights Through Time Over/Unde er Weights Perfection Warming Cooling Too Hot Too Cold 19 RBAA vs Institutional Portfolio Performance (Net of fees) RBAA Portfolio Inst. Portfolio Annualized Return 9.5% 7.9% Annualized Risk 8.3% 11.5% Risk Free Rate 4. 4. Sharpe Ratio 0.67 0.34 *Based on data from Greenwich Associates. Please see appendix for further information and index descriptions. Current RBAA forecasts reflect a relatively benign environment Regime Inflation Growth Current Forecast Probability Historical Average Difference Too Hot Rising Falling 28% 11% 17% Too Cold Falling Negative 7% 7% Cooling Falling Falling 35% 2 15% Warming Steady/Rising Steady/Rising 2 46% 26% Perfection Falling Rising 17% 16% 1% Total 10 10 20

Current RBAA model position: Underweight nominal bonds and overweight inflation hedges Current Weight Neutral Mix Active Weight US Stocks 32% 3 2% International Stocks 25% 2 5% Emerging Market 4% 5% -1% REITs 2% 5% -3% Aggregate Bonds 18% 2-2% US Treasuries 1% 1-9% High Yield 5% -5% 15+ Year STRIPS 3% 3% TIPS 6% 6% Commodities 9% 5% 4% Total 10 10 3% -13% 1 21 Conclusion We believe: 1. Regimes are important drivers of relative asset class performance. They evolve due to changes in investors expectations. ti The transitions are not a simple cycle of heating and cooling. 2. A regime-based asset allocation framework can add value. Systematically combines regime probabilities with regime contingent asset class performance. 3. Regime based asset allocation can be implemented across the entire portfolio or within asset classes. 22

Appendix - Sources Asset Class Name Index Start End US /US Real Stock Return S&P 500 12/31/1969 08/31/2011 International MSCI EAFE 12/31/1970 08/31/2011 Emerging Market MSCI EM 12/31/1987 08/31/2011 10-Year Treasury St. Louis Fed 12/31/1969 08/31/2011 High Yield Bonds CSFB High Yield Index 12/31/1985 08/31/2011 Corporate Bonds Barclays Capital US IG Corporate Bond 01/31/1973 08/31/2011 TIPS Barclays US Government Inflation Linked Bond 03/31/1997 08/31/2011 TIPS 2 ISSG TIPS Simulation 01/31/1972 03/31/1997 Private Cambridge Associates Private returns 01/31/1996 03/31/2011 Hedge Funds HFRI fund weighted composite 01/31/1990 08/31/2011 GSCI S&P GSCI 01/31/1973 08/31/2011 CPI CPI Urban Consumers (seasonally adjusted) 12/31/1969 07/31/2011 Oil NYMEX Crude Futures/Spot Oil 12/31/1969 08/31/2011 Gold COMEX Gold/Spot Gold 12/31/1969 08/31/2011 GDP US GDP (seasonally adjusted) 12/31/1969 06/30/2011 Real Estate (Listed) FTSE EPRA/NAREIT U.S. Real Estate Index Series 12/31/1989 08/31/2011 GDP Revisions Survey of Professional Forecasters/Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia 12/31/1969 08/31/2011 CPI Revisions Survey of Professional Forecasters/Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia 12/31/1969 08/31/2011 - The Survey of Professional Forecasters is the oldest quarterly survey of macroeconomic forecasts in the United States. The survey began in 1968 and was conducted by the American Statistical Association and the National Bureau of Economic Research. The Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia took over the survey in 1990. The forecasted annual CPI inflation and GDP growth are an aggregation of the forecasted values for each of the next four quarters. - The MSCI EAFE index is widely accepted as a benchmark for international stock performance (excluding the United States and Canada), and measures the performance of the developed stock markets of Europe, Australia, and the Far East (EAFE). The index is an aggregate of 22 individual country indices that collectively represent many of the major markets of the world. The index series includes only markets, companies, and share classes available to foreign investors. It is designed to maximize float and liquidity, minimize cross-ownership, ownership, and accurately reflect the market s total size, industry composition, and size of stock. The index is calculated on a total return with the percentage change in price plus actual coupon income making up the total return. The index is rebalanced monthly - S&P 500 Index is considered to be generally representative of the U.S. large capitalization stock market as a whole. It is an unmanaged capitalization-weighted index of 500 commonly traded stocks designed to measure performance of the broad domestic economy through changes in the aggregate market value of those stocks. The index assumes reinvestment of dividends. - The CSFB High Yield Index, compiled by Credit Suisse First Boston, measures high-yield debt securities, which are often referred to as junk bonds. - MSCI Emerging Markets Index (EM) is a capitalization-weighted benchmark designed to measure global emerging equity market performance and is calculated on a total return basis with dividends reinvested. - Typical institutional portfolio data is based on a survey compiled by Greenwich Associates on average asset allocations for Corporate, Public, and Endowment & Foundation plans covering the period from 1990-2009. The ISSG applied the 1990 weights to 1988 and 1989 as well, and used the 2010 weights for 2011. - RBAA portfolio is a dynamically adjusted portfolio based on the Typical Institutional Portfolio. The allocation swings are shown on page 17. 23 Appendix - CPI Urban Consumers (seasonally adjusted) All Urban program produces monthly data on changes in the prices paid by urban consumers for a representative basket of goods and services. - HFRI Fund of Funds Composite Index is an equally weighted performance index of fund of hedge funds selected by HFR. The index includes both onshore and offshore fund of funds, which invest across the spectrum of hedge fund strategies. There are no minimum asset sizes or operating history constraints. All underlying funds report returns net of fees and in US dollars. HFR, as a business practice, does not reveal of the names of participant funds. - The FTSE EPRA/NAREIT U.S. Real Estate Index Series is designed to provide the most comprehensive assessment of overall industry performance, and includes all tax-qualified real estate investment trusts (REITs) that are listed on the New York Stock Exchange, the American Stock Exchange and the NASDAQ National Market List. The index constituents span the commercial real estate space across the US economy and provide investors with exposure to all investment and property sectors. - Cambridge Associates Private Returns- Please refer to the Proprietary Benchmarks page of the Cambridge Associates website at www.cambridgeassociates.com for additional information. - The Barclays US Government Inflation-Linked Bond Index measures the performance of the US Treasury Inflation Protected Securities ("TIPS") market. The index includes TIPS with one or more years remaining maturity with total outstanding issue size of $500m or more. - TIPS returns prior to 1997 were simulated by the ISSG using breakeven inflation rates from the United Kingdom, Ten-Year Treasury Yields, and Survey of Professional Forecasters data from the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia. - The Barclays Capital U.S. IG Corporate Bond Index is a broad-based benchmark that measures the investment grade, fixed-rate, taxable, corporate bond market. It includes USDdenominated securities publicly issued by U.S. and non-u.s. industrial, utility, and financial issuers that meet specified maturity, liquidity, and quality requirements. Securities in the index roll up to the U.S. Credit and U.S. Aggregate Indices. The index was launched on January 1, 1973. - NYMEX Oil is an index blend of several U.S. domestic streams of light sweet crude oil with physical delivery. - COMEX Gold is an index of 100 troy ounces of gold with physical delivery. - The Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis is one of the 12 regional reserve banks in the Fed System. - S&P GSCI index is a composite index of commodity sector returns representing an unleveraged, long-only investment in commodity futures that is broadly diversified across the spectrum of commodities. The returns are calculated on a fully collateralized basis with full reinvestment. - These benchmarks are broad-based indices which are used for comparative purposes only and have been selected as they are well known and are easily recognizable by investors. Comparisons to benchmarks have limitations because benchmarks have volatility and other material characteristics that may differ from the portfolio. For example, investments made for the portfolio may differ significantly in terms of security holdings, industry weightings and asset allocation from those of the benchmark. Accordingly, investment results and volatility of the portfolio may differ from those of the benchmark. Also, the indices noted in this presentation are unmanaged, are not available for direct investment, and are not subject to management fees, transaction costs or other types of expenses that the portfolio may incur. In addition, the performance of the indices reflects reinvestment of dividends and, where applicable, capital gain distributions. Therefore, investors should carefully consider these limitations and differences when evaluating the comparative benchmark data performance. The indices are trademarks and have been licensed for use by The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation (together with its affiliates and subsidiaries) and are used solely herein for comparative purposes. The foregoing index licensers are not affiliated with The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation, do not endorse, sponsor, sell or promote the investment strategies or products mentioned in this presentation and they make no representation regarding advisability of investing in the products and strategies described herein. 24

Disclosures BNY Mellon Asset Management is one of the world s leading investment management organizations, encompassing BNY Mellon s affiliated investment management firms and global distribution companies. BNY Mellon is the corporate brand of The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation. BNY Products or services described herein are provided by BNY Mellon, its subsidiaries, affiliates or related companies and may be provided in various countries by one or more of these companies where authorized and regulated as required within each jurisdiction. However, this material is not intended, nor should be construed, as an offer or solicitation of services or products or an endorsement thereof in any jurisdiction or in any circumstance that is otherwise unlawful or unauthorized. The investment products and services mentioned here are not insured by the FDIC (or any other state or federal agency), are not deposits of or guaranteed by any bank, and may lose value. Products or services described herein are provided by BNY Mellon, its subsidiaries, affiliates or related companies and may be provided in various countries by one or more of these companies where authorized and regulated as required within each jurisdiction. However, this material is not intended, nor should be construed, as an offer or solicitation of services or products or an endorsement thereof in any jurisdiction or in any circumstance that is otherwise unlawful or unauthorized. The investment products and services mentioned here are not insured by the FDIC (or any other state or federal agency), are not deposits of or guaranteed by any bank, and may lose value. Interests in any investment vehicles may be offered and sold in Canada through BNY Mellon Asset Management Canada, Ltd., a Portfolio Manager and Exempt Market Dealer. markets are subject generally to market, market sector, market liquidity, issuer and investment style risks, and fixed income markets are subject generally to interest rate, credit, liquidity, pre-payment and extension, and market risks among other factors, all to varying degrees. Investing in international markets involves special risks, including changes in currency exchange rates, political, economic, and social instability, a lack of comprehensive company information, differing auditing and legal standards, and less market liquidity. References to future expected returns and performance are not promises or even estimates of actual returns or performance that may be realized, and should not be relied upon. The forecasts contained herein are for illustrative purposes only and are not to be relied upon as advice, interpreted as a recommendation, or be guarantees of performance. In addition, the forecasts are based upon subjective estimates and assumptions about circumstances and events that may not have taken place and may never do so. The ISSG TIPS Simulation returns used within this analysis is based on simulations using various components that include composite returns, fund returns and index returns. Investors cannot invest in an index or a composite. Indices are unmanaged, and are not subject to management fees, transaction costs or other types of expenses that a composite or portfolio may incur. Because of these differences investors should carefully consider these limitations when evaluating performance comparisons. The results shown are provided for illustration purposes only. They have inherent limitations because they are not based on actual transactions, but are based on the historical returns of the selected investments and various assumptions of past and future events. The results do not represent, and are not necessarily indicative of, the results that may be achieved in the future; actual returns may vary significantly. In addition, the historical returns used as a basis for this chart are based on information gathered by The Bank of New York Mellon or from third party sources, and have not been independently verified. No investment process is risk free and there is no guarantee of profitability; investors may lose all of their investments. No investment strategy or risk management technique can guarantee returns or eliminate risk in any market environment. The enclosed material is not to be reproduced or redistributed in whole or in part without prior written consent of ISSG. The information in this material is only as current as the date indicated, and may be superseded by subsequent market events or for other reasons. The RBAA portfolio and typical institutional portfolio returns are based on simulations using various index returns. Investors cannot invest in an index. Indices are unmanaged, and are not subject to management fees, transaction costs or other types of expenses that a portfolio may incur. As an illustration of these fees, returns are shown net of 50 basis points (bps) on all assets. The following provides a simplified example of the cumulative effect of management fees on investment performance. An annual management fee of 50 bps applied over a five-year period to a $100 million portfolio with an annualized gross return of 1 would produce a 9.5% annual return and reduce the value of the portfolio from $161 million to $157 million. 25 Disclosures HYPOTHETICAL OR SIMULATED PERFORMANCE RESULTS HAVE CERTAIN INHERENT LIMITATIONS. UNLIKE AN ACTUAL PERFORMANCE RECORD, SIMULATED RESULTS DO NOT REPRESENT ACTUAL TRADING. SIMULATED TRADING PROGRAMS IN GENERAL ARE ALSO SUBJECT TO THE FACT THAT THEY ARE DESIGNED WITH THE BENEFIT OF HINDSIGHT. ALSO, SINCE THE TRADES HAVE NOT ACTUALLY BEEN EXECUTED, THE RESULTS MAY HAVE UNDER OR OVER COMPENSATED FOR THE IMPACT OF CERTAIN MARKET FACTORS. IN ADDITION, HYPOTHETICAL TRADING DOES NOT INVOLVE FINANCIAL RISK. NO HYPOTHETICAL TRADING RECORD CAN COMPLETELY ACCOUNT FOR THE IMPACT OF FINANCIAL RISK IN ACTUAL TRADING. FOR EXAMPLE, THE ABILITY TO WITHSTAND LOSSES OR TO ADHERE TO A PARTICULAR TRADING PROGRAM IN SPITE OF THE TRADING LOSSES ARE MATERIAL FACTORS WHICH CAN ADVERSELY AFFECT THE ACTUAL TRADING RESULTS. THERE ARE NUMEROUS OTHER FACTORS RELATED TO THE ECONOMY OR MARKETS IN GENERAL OR TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ANY SPECIFIC TRADING PROGRAM WHICH CANNOT BE FULLY ACCOUNTED FOR IN THE PREPARATION OF HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS, ALL OF WHICH CAN ADVERSELY AFFECT TRADING RESULTS. 26