Evaluating CCRC Solvency

Similar documents
Key Financial Statistics for CCRCs and Projecting Apartment Turnover

What do Resident Stakeholders Need to Know About Actuarial Reports?

Best Practices for Managing Entry Fee Contract Risks Repositioning Your Community for Success in a Changing World April 2, 2014

National Overview of CCRC Actuarial Issues and Trends

Advanced Actuarial Issues for CCRCs

Outstanding Financial and Operating Results: The Defining Characteristics

Benevolence Assistance Liabilities: A Hidden Risk for CCRC Operators. Session 46-F Tuesday, 430P to 540P October 28, 2003

Risk Analysis and Reserving Policies for Entry Fee CCRCs

122 Tax Court Ruling Number 8 Demystifying Prepaid Medical Deductions

Actuarial Standard of Practice No. 3. Continuing Care Retirement Communities. Revised Edition

CONTINUING CARE AT HOME (CCaH): THE FINANCIAL AND ACTUARIAL DETAILS

PROSPECT/RESIDENT FINANCIAL DATA FORMS AND INSTRUCTIONS FOR YOUR RETIREMENT COMMUNITY

CONTINUING CARE AT HOME (CCaH): THE FINANCIAL AND ACTUARIAL DETAILS

Proposed Revision of Actuarial Standard of Practice No. 3. Continuing Care Retirement Communities. Comment Deadline April 30, 2007

Actuarial review as at 1 July 2013 Hannover Life Re of Australasia Ltd Superannuation Plan

Total Compensation Systems, Inc.

Total Compensation Systems, Inc.

Institute of Actuaries of India

Total Compensation Systems, Inc.

Xerox Final Salary Pension Scheme. 1. Introduction. 2. Statutory funding objective. Statement of funding principles March 2008

General Considerations

Imperial Valley Community College District Actuarial Study of Retiree Health Liabilities As of September 1, 2011

Unaudited Interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of NAV CANADA. Three and six months ended February 28, 2018 and 2017

NORTH STAR CHARTER SCHOOL, INC. Report on Audited Basic Financial Statements and Additional Information. For the Year Ended June 30, 2018

TESTING FINANCIAL STABILITY OF CONTINUING CARE RETIREMENT COMMUNITIES ERNEST J. MOORHEAD AND NIELS H. FISCHER

Total Compensation Systems, Inc.

Increase (Decrease) Total Pension Plan Net Net Pension Liability Fiduciary Position Liability

Total Compensation Systems, Inc.

Re: Actuarial Valuation Report as of January 1, 2012 Bloomington Fire Department Relief Association Pension Fund

ST. CLAIR COUNTY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM

Total Compensation Systems, Inc.

City of Albany Police and Fire Relief or Pension Fund

Issue Brief. Amer ican Academy of Actuar ies. An Actuarial Perspective on the 2006 Social Security Trustees Report

ONEIDA SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 351 AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

IAG & NRMA SUPERANNUATION PLAN REPORT TO THE TRUSTEE ON THE ACTUARIAL INVESTIGATION AS AT 30 JUNE 2018

VISION CHARTER SCHOOL, INC. AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio

National Guard Pension Fund Principal Results of Actuarial Valuation as of December 31, 2014

Post-Retirement Medical Plan GASB 74/75 Financial Accounting Disclosure For the Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2018 November 2018

CITY OF FORT COLLINS GENERAL EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT PLAN ACTUARIAL VALUATION AS OF JANUARY 1, Prepared by:

Total Compensation Systems, Inc.

ICI Specialty Chemicals Pension Fund

NEW YORK CODES, RULES AND REGULATIONS

August 29, Dear Mr. Bean:

How Retirement Readiness Varies by Gender and Family Status: A Retirement Savings Shortfall Assessment of Gen Xers

The Water and Power Employees Retirement Plan of the City of Los Angeles ACTUARIAL EXPERIENCE STUDY

Total Compensation Systems, Inc.

Stochastic Analysis Of Long Term Multiple-Decrement Contracts

San Francisco Community College District Actuarial Study of Retiree Health Liabilities As of October 1, 2009

Municipal Fire & Police Retirement System of Iowa

FRUITLAND SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 373 AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The Town of Middletown Pension Plan

FUNDING DEFINED BENEFITS ACTUARIAL REPORTS

Devon County Council Pension Fund Funding Strategy Statement

The City of Omaha Police & Fire Retirement System

State Board of Administration

SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS WOMEN FACE IN RETIREMENT SECURITY

Devon Pension Fund Funding Strategy Statement

Continuing Care Retirement Community Operations Benchmark Survey

Original SSAP and Current Authoritative Guidance: SSAP No. 52

The New Airways Pension Scheme Actuarial Valuation as at 31 March 2006

Registers of Deeds Supplemental Pension Fund. Report on the Annual Valuation Prepared as of December 31, 2014

BOARD OF TRUSTEES Agenda Item Description

Simon Fraser University Pension Plan for Administrative/Union Staff

TriMet Defined Benefit Retirement Plan for Management and Staff Employees

February 3, Experience Study Judges Retirement Fund

As you are aware, a copy of the Report should be filed with the State at the following address upon approval by the Pension Board.

Prepared by: Questar III - BOCES

ABC School District Notes to the Financial Statements For the Year Ended June 30, 2017 (Dollar amounts in thousands)

Total Compensation Systems, Inc.

THE CHANGING CONSUMER: SPENDING PATTERNS & FINANCIAL ASSETS

A full actuarial valuation of the SFM Plan was carried out as at 31 December 2017 by a qualified independent actuary.

ABC School District Notes to the Financial Statements For the Year Ended June 30, 2018 (Dollar amounts in thousands)

***ADDENDUM TWO*** REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) Post Employment Benefits Other than Pensions Actuarial Valuation June 15, 2018

TOWN OF COHASSET, MASSACHUSETTS OTHER POSTEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS PROGRAM

TEACHERS RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF GEORGIA REPORT OF THE ACTUARY ON THE VALUATION PREPARED AS OF JUNE 30, 2016

UP-ISLAND REGIONAL SCHOOL DISTRICT OTHER POSTEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS PROGRAM

TOWN OF TISBURY OTHER POSTEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS PROGRAM

MARTHA'S VINEYARD LAND BANK OTHER POSTEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS PROGRAM

TEACHERS' RETIREMENT BOARD REGULAR MEETING. SUBJECT: SCR 105 Report on System Funding ITEM NUMBER: 6 CONSENT: ATTACHMENT(S): 1

March 24, Board of Trustees Houston Municipal Employees Pension System 1201 Louisiana Suite 900 Houston, TX 77002

RETIREMENT PLAN FOR POLICE OFFICERS AND FIREFIGHTERS

August 31, 2017 PRIVATE

ESTIMATED ACCRUAL COSTS EGD PENSION PLANS JUNE 30, 2015

PAROCHIAL EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM ACTUARIAL VALUATION AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2014

Unaudited Interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of NAV CANADA. Three and nine months ended May 31, 2018 and 2017

GEM COUNTY MOSQUITO ABATEMENT DISTRICT. Report on Audited Basic Financial Statements and Supplemental Information

Employees' Retirement Fund of the City of Fort Worth Revised Actuarial Valuation and Review as of January 1, 2014

Total Compensation Systems, Inc.

Note 23: Employee Compensation Pension and Other Employee Future Benefits

San Diego City Employees Retirement System. GASB 67/68 Report As of June 30, 2014 for the City of San Diego. Produced by Cheiron

8,094 62,686 70,780 70, ,261 55,715 39,619 95,334 1,030,533 1,030,533 1,125,867 23,744 6,178 (865,748) (859,570)

MISCELLANEOUS PLAN OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM (CalPERS ID: ) Annual Valuation Report as of June 30, 2012

MISCELLANEOUS PLAN OF THE CITY OF ESCONDIDO (CalPERS ID: ) Annual Valuation Report as of June 30, 2012

ASC 715 (US GAAP) ACTUARIAL VALUATION REPORT AS AT DECEMBER 31, 2012 CONSOLIDATED TOTAL FOR PENSION PLANS ENBRIDGE GAS DISTRIBUTION INC.

Teachers Pension and Annuity Fund of New Jersey. Experience Study July 1, 2006 June 30, 2009

GEM COUNTY MOSQUITO ABATEMENT DISTRICT. Report on Audited Basic Financial Statements and Supplemental Information

ANNUAL ACTUARIAL VALUATION OF THE PREPAID TUITION TRUST FUND FOR KENTUCKY S AFFORDABLE PREPAID TUITION JUNE 30, 2017

EBRI Retirement Security Projection Model (RSPM) Analyzing Policy and Design Proposals

Marcus L. Ward Home (d/b/a Winchester Gardens at Ward Homestead)

Transcription:

Evaluating CCRC Solvency AV Powell & Associates LLC Atlanta, GA 404.845.0360 fax 404.845.0366 AV@avpowell.com Chesterfield, MO 636.530.1072 fax 636.530.1073 Kathie.Harris@avpowell.com Helping you solve your management challenges

Overview Defining solvency Methods of measuring solvency Case examples How do we use this information? CCRC Solvency 2

How Do You Determine Solvency? What is the definition of solvency? Stakeholders opinions Board and management Residents Regulators Financing institutions CCRC Solvency 3

General Definition of Solvency Do the assets of your organization equal or exceed your liabilities? CCRC Solvency 4

Hierarchy of Solvency Criteria Level One (Residents) Cash inflows projected to exceed cash outflows No technical defaults of loan covenants Level Two (Regulators and Financing Institutions) Projected accumulation of significant reserves DSR and Cash-to-debt ratios exceed targets Level Three (Board and Management) Meets criteria for satisfactory actuarial balance CCRC Solvency 5

Potential Measures of Solvency State CCRC statutes (regulation) Bond covenants A pre-defined set of ratio criteria (targets) Feasibility studies prepared in accordance with GAAP CCRC Solvency 6

Solvency Measures in Regulation No federal or national standards Four regulatory categories Primarily disclosure or filing (19 states) Minimum assets accruals (9 states) Alternative reserve valuation (2 states) Actuarial reserve valuation (5 states) CCRC Solvency 7

Distribution of Regulatory Categories CCRC Solvency 8

Solvency Measures in Bond Covenants Minimum debt service coverage requirements Possible cash-to-debt thresholds Concerned only with ability to repay bonds, not obligations to residents CCRC Solvency 9

Solvency Measures using Ratio Analysis Is there a magic set (high statistical correlation) of ratio that would indicate that a CCRC is solvent? If so, how does it vary and what are criteria for: Mix of contract types Age of facility Unit configuration CCRC Solvency 10

Solvency Measures from Feasibility Study Five-year financial projection is too short to uncover long-term pricing problems Expectation that $0 GAAP future service obligation means that all liabilities are fully funded Which measure indicates net worth? FSO or Net Assets CCRC Solvency 11

ASOP No. 3 Conditions for Satisfactory Actuarial Balance Developed by American Academy of Actuaries Committee on CCRCs Adopted by Actuarial Standard Board, July 1994 Defines three criteria to be tested by: Condition 1 Actuarial balance sheet Condition 2 Cohort pricing analysis Condition 3 Cash flow projection CCRC Solvency 12

Condition 1: Funded Status @ 100% Are the resources available for current residents greater than or equal to the actuarial present value of the expected costs of meeting all remaining obligations to such residents under their contracts, with appropriate provision for surplus? Laymen s terms do the reserves held by the organization, which include liquid assets and PP&E, cover the shortfall between future costs and fees CCRC Solvency 13

Condition 2: New Entrant Pricing Surplus @ 0% Does the sum of entry fees paid plus the actuarial present value of monthly fees equal or exceed the actuarial present value at occupancy of the costs for meeting all obligations for a typical cohort of new entrants, with appropriate provision for surplus? Laymen s terms will the combination of future monthly fees and entry fees cover the expected future costs of care and entry fee refunds for a group a new residents CCRC Solvency 14

Condition 3: Projected Cash Balances @ $0 Are positive cash balances projected with respect to current and future residents for a period of at least twenty years? Laymen s terms is the facility projected to generate sufficient cash to pay its expenses? CCRC Solvency 15

Why Use the Actuarial Conditions? Consistent Comprehensive Robust in handling facility uniqueness (variations) Procedural and applicable in real life 20 year history of meaningful use CCRC Solvency 16

How Do You Determine Your Actuarial Position? Collect and analyze data Resident demographics Resident movements Operating and capital budgets and history Project future population flows Generate financial projections Population flows Financial assumptions CCRC Solvency 17

How Do You Determine Your Actuarial Position? (continued) Evaluate financial projections Test sensitivity to alternative assumptions Changes in economic assumptions New entrant contract selection Changes in health care utilization Discuss results and develop pricing policies CCRC Solvency 18

Empirical Data on Condition 1 Funded Status Median is fully funded Recommended surplus depends on age of facility, mix of continuing care contracts and their risks AVP standards are: 5 to 10% surplus 102.0% 100.0% 98.0% 96.0% 1999 2000 Prelim CCRC Solvency 19

Do Reserves and Fees for Current Residents Cover their Costs? Monthly Fees Actuarial Reserves Ind. Living Costs Assisted Living Costs Nursing Costs Refund Liabilities Actuarial Deficit $ 77.1 million 30.8 million 60.5 million 21.0 million 26.6 million 0.6 million ($ 0.8 million) CCRC Solvency 20

Calculation of Funded Status? 100% + Actuarial Deficit Divided by Total Actuarial Liabilities + Refund Liability = Funded Status ($ 0.8 million) 108.1 million 0.7 million 99.3% CCRC Solvency 21

Empirical Data on Condition 2 New Entrant Pricing Surplus Median is nearly 9% 35.0% 30.0% Recommended surplus 25.0% depends on size of facility, 20.0% type of continuing care 15.0% contract and its risk 10.0% AVP standards are: 5.0% 10 to 15% surplus 0.0% 1999 2000 Prelim GPR INV OHK CCRC Solvency 22

Do Entry and Monthly Fees for New Entrants Cover their Costs? Entry Fee - Expected Refunds Future Monthly Fees - Cohort Liabilities Actuarial Surplus $ 133,602 ( 3,699) 382,943 505,590 $ 7,256 CCRC Solvency 23

Calculation of New Entrant Surplus(Deficit)? Actuarial Surplus Divided by Total Cohort Liabilities + Refund Liability = Actuarial Surplus $ 7,256 505,590 3,699 1.4% CCRC Solvency 24

Empirical Data on Condition 3 Projected Cash Balances Median is increasing cash balances Recommended position is for reserves to at least match increases in expenses since liabilities will approximately increase the same AVP standards are: 1.48 to 1.79 (10 year growth) 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 1999 2000 Prelim GPR INV OHK CCRC Solvency 25

Calculation of 10-Year Projected Reserves Projected Liquid Reserve Balance Divided by Initial Liquid Reserve Balance = 10-Year Reserve Change Factor $ 31,472,000 $ 14,050,000 2.24x CCRC Solvency 26

Issues that Relate to Actuarial Opinion Consultant must apply experience and judgment in reviewing results to formulate an opinion A CCRC can be considered in satisfactory actuarial balance even if one criteria isn t met initially using baseline assumptions Many solutions may exist if a CCRC doesn t meet one or more of the criteria CCRC Solvency 27

Sample Financial Assumptions ILU Occupancy ILU Per Capita Costs (2000$s) Median GPR INV OHK 1999 95.6 2000* 94.9 95.2 95.6 94.7 Median GRP INV OHK 1999 $40.80 2000* $43.95 $34.01 $33.62 $36.94 CCRC Solvency 28

Case Example A Funded status: 99.3% New entrant surplus: 1.4% Projected cash balances: 2.24x $32 million in debt with expansion financing Are they in satisfactory actuarial balance? YES, barely CCRC Solvency 29

Actuarial Study Trends 105% 5% 103% 4% 101% 3% 99% 2% 97% 1% 95% 1997 1998 1999 2000 0% 1997 1998 1999 2000 Funded Status New Entrant Pricing CCRC Solvency 30

Actuarial Study Trends 50% 2.5 45% 2.3 40% 35% 2.1 1.9 1.7 30% 1997 1998 1999 2000 1.5 1997 1998 1999 2000 Liquid Reserve Ratio 10-Year Cash Growth CCRC Solvency 31

Actuarial Report Card Result Quartile Grade Actuarial Funded Status 99.3% Second B+ New Entrant Pricing 1.4% First B Projected Cash Accumulation Health Care Capacity 2.44x Third Sufficient for Expected Utilization A A- Remember: Future fee increases must cover internal expense inflation or funded status may decline CCRC Solvency 32

Other Case Examples 150.0% 140.0% 130.0% 120.0% 110.0% 100.0% 90.0% 80.0% 70.0% 60.0% 50.0% Site A Site B Site C Site D Funded Status NE Surplus Cash Growth 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 CCRC Solvency 33

Case Example B Funded status: 103.6% New entrant surplus: 20.1% Projected cash balances: 2.83 $26 million in debt Are they in satisfactory actuarial balance? YES Have capability for lower rates of future fee increases or expansion in non-revenue generating areas CCRC Solvency 34

Case Example C Funded status: 95.9% New entrant surplus: (0.6%) Projected cash balances: 2.36x $20 million in debt Are they in satisfactory actuarial balance? NO Increase monthly fees by 6.5% immediately, or by 1.3% over internal inflation for remaining lifetimes CCRC Solvency 35

Case Example D Funded status: 71.9% New entrant surplus: 30.6% ($84,000 per 28 annual turnover) Projected cash balances: 1.97x Are they in satisfactory actuarial balance? MAYBE New entrants generate $2.4 million surplus annually; project that they will show fully funded in 12 years CCRC Solvency 36

How Does Management Implement a Plan for Maintaining Actuarial Balance? Board should adopt policies on ranges in acceptable actuarial results from year-to-year For a 100% lifecare facility, set target: Funded status of 103 to 105 percent New entrant cohort surplus of 8 to 12 percent 10-year cash projection increase of 1.70 Targets will vary according to many factors Adjust fees at budget time to maintain these targets CCRC Solvency 37

Summary Estimating the GAAP FSO is of minimal use Trending GAAP FSO has marginal value There is no known set of ratio criteria that ensures and validates solvency Methods to achieve satisfactory actuarial balance have become the de facto standard for prudent stewardship CCRC Solvency 38

APPENDIX: AVP 2000 COMPARATIVE STATISTICS

OVERVIEW Description and purpose of database Definition of actuarial report card 1999 and preliminary 2000 statistics CCRC Solvency 40

Description and Purpose of Database Objective was to share the distribution of results from clients that we review regularly It s our opinion that these clients represent the best of CCRCs, in terms of financial condition Annual updates for limited number of statistics 76 sites in 1999 results 61 sites (# of responses vary) in preliminary 2000* results CCRC Solvency 41

Development of Actuarial Report Card The actuarial report card has been used in to summarize the results of the actuarial study Actuarial valuation New entrant pricing analysis Projected cash flows Adequacy of health care beds Use of comparative results database allows us to more objectively assign grades CCRC Solvency 42

Comparative Database Grading System: Satisfactory Actuarial Balance Based on where a client s results falls in data, a consistent grade would be assigned First quartile (0 to 25 th percentile) up to B Second quartile (25 th to 50 th percentile) B to A- Third quartile (50 th to 75 th percentile) A- to A Fourth quartile(75 th to 100 th percentile) A to A+ CCRCs should target grades of A or higher in all three conditions for satisfactory actuarial balance CCRC Solvency 43

Comparative Database Grading System: Evaluating Health Care Adequacy Appropriate to consider total combined health care needs as opposed to assisted living or nursing or dementia separately due to modeling credibility Compare capacity to expected utilization and potential variation in annual needs; grading criteria Capacity<Expected up to B Expected<Capacity<90 th percentile B to A- Expected<90 th percentile<capacity A- to A+ CCRC Solvency 44

Comparative Statistics from the AVP Database Actuarial Demographic Financial CCRC Solvency 45

Actuarial Statistics Funded Status New Entrant Pricing 10-Year Reserve Increase Factor Liquid Reserve Ratio Actuarial Ratio Actuarial Return on Fixed Assets CCRC Solvency 46

Funded Status (Table 4.1) Measures extent to which future costs associated with current residents are met by current reserves and future revenues. 25th 50th Average 75th 1999 94.5 100.3 102.2 109.0 2000* 96.8 101.5 104.7 109.0 Percentages CCRC Solvency 47

Single New Entrant Pricing (Table 5.1) Measures the degree to which fees charged to new entrants are expected to cover the cost of contractual obligations. 25th 50th Average 75th 1999 1.5 8.4 9.7 17.8 2000* 1.6 8.0 9.2 16.7 Percentages CCRC Solvency 48

Couple New Entrant Pricing (Table 5.1) Measures the degree to which fees charged to new entrants are expected to cover the cost of contractual obligations. 25th 50th Average 75th 1999 3.4 10.2 10.3 16.4 2000* 3.0 11.4 10.9 16.7 Percentages CCRC Solvency 49

Typical New Entrant Pricing (Table 5.1) Measures the degree to which fees charged to new entrants are expected to cover the cost of contractual obligations. 25th 50th Average 75th 1999 2.4 8.2 9.6 15.4 2000* 3.8 8.8 9.5 14.3 Percentages CCRC Solvency 50

10-Year Reserve Increase Factor Represents the expected growth in liquid reserves. 25th 50th Average 75th 1999 1.14 1.72 2.24 2.55 2000* 1.52 2.09 N/A 2.85 CCRC Solvency 51

Liquid Reserve Ratio Measures the degree to which actuarial liabilities are met by liquid assets. 25th 50th Average 75th 1999 27.1 52.4 51.5 68.9 2000* 27.4 53.0 62.6 76.8 Percentages CCRC Solvency 52

Actuarial Ratio Represents the portion of future expenses covered by revenues that can be adjusted in the future. 25th 50th Average 75th 1999 62.7 69.9 70.0 75.7 2000* 63.9 69.8 70.3 76.3 Percentages CCRC Solvency 53

Actuarial Return on Fixed Assets A measure of the internal rate of return on investment in fixed assets. 25th 50th Average 75th 1999 7.20 8.90 9.64 11.95 2000* 7.70 9.38 10.01 12.53 Percentages CCRC Solvency 54

Demographic Statistics Average Age at Entry Average Attained Age Life Expectancy Health Care Ratio CCRC Solvency 55

Average Entry Age Female Male 25th 50th Average 75th 1999 78.6 80.0 79.7 81.3 2000* 78.6 80.0 79.9 81.5 25th 50th Average 75th 1999 79.3 80.3 80.5 81.7 2000* 79.1 80.8 80.6 82.2 CCRC Solvency 56

Average Attained Age Female Male 25th 50th Average 75th 1999 82.4 84.5 84.0 86.0 2000* 82.8 84.9 84.5 86.1 25th 50th Average 75th 1999 82.3 83.6 83.5 85.0 2000* 82.2 83.9 83.8 85.3 CCRC Solvency 57

Age-80 Life Expectancy Total remaining life expectancy for an 80-year-old resident. Female Male 25th 50th Average 75th 1999 10.6 11.2 10.9 11.5 2000* 10.1 11.1 10.8 11.5 25th 50th Average 75th 1999 7.8 8.3 8.2 8.6 2000* 7.7 8.3 8.1 8.6 CCRC Solvency 58

Number of ALU Residents per 100 ILU Residents Measures assisted living utilization by contractholders. 25th 50th 75th 2000* 6.20 10.32 17.15 CCRC Solvency 59

Number of NUR Residents per 100 ILU Residents Measures nursing care utilization by contractholders. 25th 50th 75th 2000* 9.31 13.98 20.46 CCRC Solvency 60

Number of Health Care Residents per 100 ILU Residents Measures health care utilization by contractholders. 25th 50th 75th 2000* 14.49 26.14 35.72 CCRC Solvency 61

Financial Statistics Average Occupancy Per Capita Expense Per Day CCRC Solvency 62

Average ILU Occupancy 25th 50th Average 75th 1999 NA 95.6 92.2 NA 2000* 89.5 94.9 92.4 97.8 Percentages CCRC Solvency 63

Average ALU Occupancy 25th 50th Average 75th 1999 NA 91.7 87.7 NA 2000* 88.5 93.0 90.3 96.2 Percentages CCRC Solvency 64

Average NUR Occupancy 25th 50th Average 75th 1999 NA 93.9 92.1 NA 2000* 85.3 91.4 87.9 95.0 Percentages CCRC Solvency 65

Per Capita ILU Expense Per Day Reflects gross operating expenses per day by level of care. 25th 50th Average 75th 1999 $32.98 $40.80 $44.95 $55.93 2000* $37.37 $43.17 $48.09 $58.88 CCRC Solvency 66

Per Capita ALU Expense Per Day Reflects gross operating expenses per day by level of care. 25th 50th Average 75th 1999 $73.50 $87.55 $87.70 $102.58 2000* $73.42 $92.67 $91.34 $106.43 CCRC Solvency 67

Per Capita NUR Expense Per Day Reflects gross operating expenses per day by level of care. 25th 50th Average 75th 1999 $122.64 $142.85 $146.02 $168.36 2000* $125.65 $147.16 $149.92 $175.92 CCRC Solvency 68