Focus on Severance Pay Arrangements Under the New Deferred Compensation Proposed Regulations

Similar documents
Employee Benefits Client Alert: October 2008

IRS proposes clarifying regulations for nonqualified deferred compensation plans

New IRS Guidance On Deferred Compensation

Getting Up to Speed on the Final Regulations for Deferred Compensation

IRS Finalizes Regulations Under Section 409A, Finally

409A PROPOSED REGULATIONS: MORE GUIDANCE AND LIMITED TRANSITION RELIEF

Advanced Markets Because You Asked

Navigating the Proposed 409A Regulations-General Rules By Mary K. Samsa, Joyce L. Meyer, and Barbara A. Cronin

IRS Issues Long-Awaited Proposed Regulations under Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code

Beware the Ides of March: Voluntary Deferral Elections for 2005 Must Be Made by March 15

SECTION 409A: A NIGHTMARE OF COMPLEXITY

Section 409A and Severance Arrangements

Public companies will need to identify specified employees in advance in order to comply with document requirements.

IRS ISSUES PROPOSED REGULATIONS UNDER CODE SECTION 409A COVERING NEW DEFERRED COMPENSATION RULES

Newly Issued Code Section 457(f) Proposed Regulations Offer Clarity and New Opportunities in Designing Executive Compensation

IRS Transition Guidance on Deferred Compensation Legislation

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plans: Building on the Foundation

In October 2004, the American Jobs Creation Act

THE NONQUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION ADVISOR 2007 SUPPLEMENT

THE BRAVE NEW. New Rules on Deferred Compensation and Severance

Compensation of Founders and Key Employees of Emerging Companies After The Enactment of Section 409A * Kenneth R. Hoffman Venable LLP Washington, D.C.

INITIAL GUIDANCE ON NEW DEFERRED COMPENSATION RULES

Deferred Compensation Legislation Urgent Need for Guidance

Proposed Modifications/Clarifications to the 409A Regulations

NONQUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION: THE EFFECT OF THE NEW RULES NOW AND IN THE FUTURE

Global Employer Rewards. Nonqualified Deferred Compensation: The Effect of Section 409A Now and in the Future

Part III. Administrative, Procedural, and Miscellaneous

LEGAL ALERT. April 13, 2007

Anatomy of a Deferred Compensation Plan

Recent Developments Affecting Qualified and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation, Part I: New Proposed Regulations

Advanced Designs. Pocket Guide. Questions & Answers Regarding IRC Section 409A and the Final IRC Section 409A Regulations

Code Section 409A: Revisiting the Basics

The tax code provides two general tax regimes for the taxation of deferred compensation. The regime that applies depends on the tax status of the

Newly Issued 457(f) Proposed Regulations Clarify Rules for Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Provided by Non-Profit and Governmental Entities

Legal Updates & News. IRS Issues Final Section 409A Regulations May 2007 by Timothy G. Verrall, Paul Borden, Patrick McCabe.

409A FOR THE HOLIDAYS: Deferred Compensation Year-End Matters. December 8, 2009

Deferred Compensation for Dummies: The Section 409A Compliance Clock is Ticking

ALI-ABA Course of Study Executive Compensation: Strategy, Design, and Implementation June 19-20, 2008 New York, New York

Compensation Planning for Tax-Exempt Entities: Navigating IRC Section 457(f) Presented by Mary E. Powell, Marc Fosse and Eric Schillinger

THE NEW DEFERRED COMPENSATION RULES

U.S. Tax Advisory. Final section 409A regulations What you need to know and do now

Friday, 15 July 2016 #WRN Compensation Plans (REG ), Proposed Rule, June 22, 2016.

Worth the Wait? The Final Section 409A Regulations

SEPARATION AGREEMENTS CENTRAL NEW YORK SALES & MARKETING EXECUTIVES

Executive Compensation and Benefits Practice Team October 14, 2004

Foley & Lardner LLP. May 13, :00 p.m. 2:00 p.m. EST

Compensation & Benefits

Employee Benefits Update

Tax Reform: Comparison of House, Senate and Conference Report Versions of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (H.R. 1)

New Deferred Compensation Legislation Summary and Action Steps

May 3, McDermott Health Care HR Center

Tax Reform: Comparison of House and Senate Versions of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (H.R. 1)

SPRINGS WINDOW FASHIONS 401(K) RETIREMENT PLAN SUMMARY PLAN DESCRIPTION

Compensating the Executive of a Charitable Organization

Part I. Rulings and Decisions Under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986

H. Compensation. Present Law

Mastering New IRC 457(f) Plan Guidance for ERISA Counsel: Structuring Deferred Comp Plans for Nonprofit Entities

Nuts & Bolts of Section 409A: Practical Issues to Consider in Every Practice

ADDRESSING DEFERRED COMPENSATION TAX RISKS

ROCKY MOUNTAIN TAX SEMINAR FOR PRIVATE FOUNDATIONS CURRENT AND DEFERRED COMPENSATION FOR DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS: THE RED FLAGS. September 11, 2013

Further Guidance on the Application of Section 409A to Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plans

Executive Compensation, Employee Benefits and ERISA Alert

IMPORTANT INFORMATION FOR THE LIVE PROGRAM

COMMENTARY JONES DAY. Section 409A operates in three steps. First, it identifies compensation it considers nonqualified deferred

Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plans Best Practices

INVESTMENT FUNDS ALERT

A Revolution in the World of Deferred Compensation

U.S. Chamber of Commerce

Recent Developments for Sections 409A and 457: Proposed Regulations and Chief Counsel Memorandum

Frederic W. Cook & Co., Inc.

COMMENTARY JONES DAY. Importantly, the Notice provides generous transitional relief for correcting certain document failures in 2010.

Workshop Overview. Deferred Compensation for Closely Held and Family Businesses

Highlights of Final Rules For Nonqualified Defined Contribution Plans

New IRS Notice Provides Employers with Ability to Correct Defects in Nonqualified Plan Documents

Executive Compensation & Employee Benefits July 30, 2004

NONQUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION & CODE 409A

American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 Changes the Rules for Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plans

The Impact of Code Section 409A on Global Compensation Plans

FILICE INSURANCE 401(K) EMPLOYEE SAVINGS PLAN SUMMARY PLAN DESCRIPTION

Impact of New IRS Rules on Severance Arrangements and Other Deferred Compensation

EAT'N PARK HOSPITALITY GROUP 401(K) PROFIT SHARING PLAN SUMMARY PLAN DESCRIPTION

Compensation Packages: What s in Your Wallet? 1 By John D. Walch Of Counsel, Labor and Employment Group April 20, 2006

IRS Provides Updated Proposed Regulations Relating to Deferred Compensation and Stock Appreciation Rights

12 Separation Pay Arrangements

Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features: Marshall Mort, Esq., Fenwick & West, Mountain View, Calif.

communicator IRS Releases Final Regulations Regarding Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plans contents T h e C o r p o r a t e

The harmonization of sections 457(f) and 409A, as previewed in

Statement of Mark D. Wincek Kilpatrick Stockton LLP at the Hearing on the Section 409A Proposed Regulations January 25, 2006

Analysis Of Section 409(a) of the Internal Revenue Code. Reaching Fair Market Value for Deferred Equity Compensation

Proposed Code Section 409A Income Inclusion Regulations

Coping with the Interaction of 409A, 457 and Form 990 Reporting Obligations

CLEARY GOTFTLIEB NEW SENATE FINANCE COMMITTEE PROPOSALS SIGNIFICANTLY CURTAIL DEFERRED COMPENSATION. New York January 17, 2007

Compensating Owners and Key Employees of Partnerships and LLC's

Chapter VI. Specialized Types of Retirement Income Plans Midwinter Report

Table II: Other Key Provisions in HR 1776 of Interest to Governmental Plans

TAX & TRANSACTIONS BULLETIN

Application of Section 409A to Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plans; Correction

T HE HCSC E M P L O Y E E S P E N S I O N P L A N

Severance Plans and ERISA Compliance: Limiting Liability in Design and Implementation of Severance Arrangements

EMPLOYEE BENEFITS UPDATE: 409A CORRECTIONS: IT S THE LAST SIGNIFICANT BITE OF THE APPLE

Transcription:

11/11/2005 Focus on Severance Pay Arrangements Under the New Deferred Compensation Proposed Regulations The Internal Revenue Service and U.S. Treasury Department recently issued proposed regulations under Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code dealing with nonqualified deferred compensation plans. It is now very clear that: Severance pay arrangements are covered by Section 409A unless specifically excluded. The proposed regulations would clarify the effect of Section 409A on severance pay arrangements and the exclusions. If a severance pay arrangement covered by Section 409A does not comply with Section 409A s detailed rules governing deferral elections and payment events, employees could face significant IRS penalties. When are these rules effective? For severance pay, Section 409A is generally effective for any rights to severance that arise after December 31, 2004, as well as to any severance pay arrangements that are materially modified after October 3, 2004. The earliest that these proposed regulations could become effective is January 1, 2007. In the meantime, however, compliance with the proposed regulations will be considered good-faith compliance with Section 409A. While Notice 2005-1, issued in late December 2004, generally remains in effect until the proposed regulations become effective, the special transition relief for severance pay plans in Notice 2005-1 ends on December 31, 2005. Therefore, following the proposed regulations will be the only certain good-faith compliance in 2006. Is there any transition relief? The proposed regulations extend certain transition relief that was made available in Notice 2005-1 and some of this relief may be helpful for severance pay arrangements. Most importantly, employers now have until the end of calendar year 2006 to adopt any amendments to their nonqualified deferred compensation plan documents in order to comply with Section 409A, so long as the plans are operated in the meantime in good-faith compliance with Section 409A. Similarly, employers now have until the end of 2006 to amend their nonqualified deferred compensation plans to permit employees to change their deferral elections without violating Section 409A, provided that the deferral elections do not relate to payments that would otherwise have been received during 2006, or cause a payment to be made in 2006 that otherwise would not have been. However, transition relief was not extended in certain other areas. For example, if employers want to amend their nonqualified deferred compensation plans to permit participants to cancel participation or to cancel deferral elections in respect to amounts subject to Section 409A, or to terminate the plans altogether, the deadline for doing so is December 31, 2005. Similarly, grandfathered plans not subject to Section 409A must be terminated no later than December 31, 2005 if an employer wishes to do so.

How do I know whether a severance pay arrangement is affected? Under the proposed regulations, a severance pay arrangement must comply with Section 409A unless an exemption applies. Severance pay arrangements are divided between arrangements that are triggered by involuntary separations and voluntary separations, with very different rules for each type of separation. Involuntary Separations The primary exemption is for severance pay arrangements that provide payments upon the employee s involuntary termination of employment if: all payments are made by the end of the second year following the year in which the involuntary termination occurs, and the total amount of payments does not exceed two times the lesser of: o the employee s annual compensation for the calendar year preceding the calendar year in which termination occurs; or o the limit on compensation under Code Section 401(a)(17) for the calendar year preceding the calendar year in which termination occurs (the limit is $205,000 for 2004, $210,000 for 2005 and $220,000 for 2006). Example: Mary is involuntarily terminated on November 1, 2005. Her compensation for all of 2004 was $220,000. She receives salary continuation payments totaling $300,000 for 24 months. These payments are exempt from Section 409A, as they do not exceed $410,000 (two times the 2004 Section 401(a)(17) limit of $205,000). If Mary were also to receive an additional payment for a release of claims and other consideration, also within the 24-month period, the additional payment could not exceed $110,000. Under the second exemption, if all payments under an involuntary severance pay arrangement are completed by March 15 of the year following the year in which the termination occurs, the arrangement will also be exempt from Section 409A, regardless of the amount of the payments. As a general matter, payments to an employee within 2 ½ months of the end of the year in which the employee earns the payments or the payments are no longer subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture are exempt from Section 409A as short-term deferrals. Terminations during a window program will be treated as involuntary terminations for purposes of Section 409A. A window program is generally defined as an employer-established program that provides severance pay in connection with a termination of employment, for a limited period of time (no greater than one year), for employees who terminate employment during that period or who terminate employment during that period under specified circumstances. The IRS and Treasury Department declined to create a categorical rule governing terminations for good cause or constructive terminations as being involuntary terminations. It is anticipated that a constructive termination will be treated as an involuntary termination only if the individual facts and circumstances clearly warrant. The third exemption is for a collectively bargained separation pay arrangement. The payments may only be made for an actual involuntary separation or under a window program. Voluntary Separation The exemption for severance pay arrangements that provide for payments upon an employee s voluntary termination of employment is much narrower. These arrangements are exempt from Section 409A only if (i) the employer has unfettered discretion to reduce or eliminate the amounts payable under the arrangement at any time, for any reason, or (ii) the employee terminates and

all payments under the arrangement are completed within 2½ months after the end of the year in which the employee first acquired a legally binding right to the amounts (i.e., generally, the year in which the arrangement was entered into). Example: In 2005, John and his employer sign an employment agreement under which John can receive severance pay if John voluntarily terminates under specified circumstances. In 2007, John resigns and asks for severance under the agreement. Because John first had a legally binding right in 2005, the payments in 2007 will be treated as deferred compensation. What about reimbursement arrangements? Severance pay arrangements frequently provide for the reimbursement of certain expenses to an employee following a termination. The proposed regulations clarify that reimbursement arrangements are generally exempt from Section 409A provided that all reimbursement payments are made by the end of the second year following the year in which the termination occurs. The exemption only applies to certain types of reimbursable expenses: outplacement expenses, moving expenses, medical expenses, or expenses that would be deductible by the employee as business expenses. In addition, other reimbursements and payments may be made that do not exceed $5,000 in the aggregate. What are the other requirements for severance pay arrangements? Section 409A generally forbids severance benefits to be distributed except upon the occurrence of certain specified events, including a separation from service. Most severance arrangements should already meet this requirement. The proposed regulations also define what qualifies as a separation from service. This definition applies to severance pay and for any other purpose under a deferred compensation plan where a payment is triggered by a separation from service. A separation from service is a death, retirement or termination of employment. A bona fide leave (sick, military or other) is not a termination if the leave is less than six months or, if longer, less than the person s guaranteed rehire period. If a leave with no guaranteed rehire exceeds six months, the separation from service occurs at the end of the six-month period. A termination of employment is generally a facts and circumstances determination. However, the IRS is concerned about situations in which a payment could be either accelerated or deferred based on a termination of employment occurring or not. If a former employee continues to provide services as an independent contractor or otherwise, there is not a termination if the individual provides services at a rate that is 50% or more of the average services provided during the prior 3 calendar years (or total employment term if less), and the annual pay is 50% or more of the individual s average annual pay for the prior 3 calendar years (or total employment term if less). On the deferral side, if an employee purported continues to be an employee but only provides insignificant services, the employee is treated as having a termination of employment. The services are not insignificant if: The individual provides services as an employee at a rate at least 20% of the average rate for the prior 3 calendar years (or total employment term if less); and the annual pay is at least 20% of the average annual pay for the prior 3 calendar years (or total employment term if less). Under Section 409A, if an employee is permitted to make a deferral election in respect to severance payments, generally, this deferral election must be made by the end of the year prior

to the year in which the employee acquires a legally binding right to such payments. The proposed regulations, however, clarify that where severance pay due to an involuntary termination is the subject of bona-fide, arms-length negotiations, the deferral election may be made at any time prior to the date on which the employee acquires the legally binding right to the severance payments. Also, like all Section 409A arrangements, a severance pay arrangement must be in writing to comply with Section 409A. What other problems can the new rules cause? One problem applies only to public companies. Section 409A generally forbids deferred compensation to be paid to specified individuals generally the employer s top 50 employees who make $130,000 or more in a year until at least six months after the individual becomes entitled to the payment due to separation from service. Therefore, severance pay arrangements that are not exempt from Section 409A and that cover employees who fall within this definition will have to be amended to postpone commencement of severance payments to these individuals for at least six months after termination of employment. Second, Section 409A also generally forbids any acceleration of severance payments. Any severance pay arrangement that is not exempt from Section 409A and that allows the employer the discretion to accelerate the time or schedule of severance payments would need to be amended to remove this discretion. Third, for Section 409A purposes, similar types of plans are aggregated, such as all account balance plans, and a problem with one aggregated plan affects all of that type of plan. The proposed regulations provide that involuntary severance pay arrangements are a separate type of plan. Therefore, a noncompliant involuntary severance plan would not disqualify any other type of deferred compensation plan. However, a voluntary severance pay plan is lumped with any other plans of the same type, usually other account balance plans. What other types of arrangements are affected by Section 409A? Remember that Section 409A applies to all nonqualified deferred compensation arrangements. This means not only severance pay arrangements, but also any type of nonqualified arrangement that provides for the deferral of compensation, including incentive compensation plans, changeof-control agreements and plans, equity awards (nonstatutory stock options and stock appreciation rights), split-dollar life insurance, and supplementary pension or wrap-401(k) plans. Section 409A generally does not apply to qualified retirement plans (such as 401(k) plans) or to most types of welfare plans (other than severance pay arrangements). What if the rules are violated? Under Section 409A, if a severance pay arrangement that is not exempt from Section 409A does not comply with Section 409A (including noncompliance during 2005), the severance payments for the covered employee become taxable as of the year in which they are no longer subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture. Also, Section 409A imposes an additional 20% penalty tax on these amounts. Finally, the employee will owe interest on these amounts at the current IRS underpayment rate plus 1%. All of the penalties fall on the employee currently. If the employee has nonqualified deferred compensation in other arrangements of a similar type, these amounts would be aggregated and subjected to the penalty tax as well.

If you have any questions about Section 409A, or about its impact on severance pay arrangements, please contact a member of the McGuireWoods Employee Benefits Group, including any of the following individuals: Steven D. Kittrell Washington Square 1050 Connecticut Avenue N.W. Suite 1200 Washington, District of Columbia 20036-5317 T: 202.857.1701 F: 202.828.2975 skittrell@mcguirewoods.com Jeffrey R. Capwell Bank of America Corporate Center 100 North Tryon Street Suite 2900 Charlotte, North Carolina 28202-4011 T: 704.353.6256 F: 704.373.8823 jcapwell@mcguirewoods.com James C. Williams Of Counsel 77 West Wacker Drive Suite 4100 Chicago, Illinois 60601-1815 T: 312.641.3025 F: 312.641.3024 jwilliams@mcguirewoods.com G. William Tysse Associate Washington Square 1050 Connecticut Avenue N.W. Suite 1200 Washington, District of Columbia 20036-5317 T: 202.857.1730 F: 202.828.2982 gtysse@mcguirewoods.com Larry R. Goldstein 77 West Wacker Drive Suite 4100 Chicago, Illinois 60601-1815 T: 312.849.8216 F: 312.920.3692 lrgoldstein@mcguirewoods.com