Jong-goo Park. Divisi'on Working Paper No October 1980

Similar documents
Mexico Sources: Surveys: Censo de la Población 1950 Encuesta de los ingresos y egresos de la población 1956, 1957

Public Disclosure Authorized DRAFT EPD INCOME DISTRIBUTION PROJECT DATA ON INCOME DISTRIBUTION IN PANAMA. Public Disclosure Authorized.

EPD INCOME DISTRIBUTION PROJECT. Jong-goo Park. Division Working Paper No August 1980

For Staff Use Only EPD INCOME DISTRIBUTION PROJECT DATA ON INCOME DISTRIBUTION IN SIERRA LEONE. Satish Kansal. Division Working Paper No.

s- s SS 4 / o%f Satish Kansal Division Working Paper No July 1981

INCOME DISTRIBUTION DATA REVIEW SPAIN 1. Available data sources used for reporting on income inequality and poverty

Age Distribution of Taxes and Social Benefits by Income Deciles: Evidence from Mexico

INCOME DISTRIBUTION AND INEQUALITY MEASURES IN SINGAPORE

EPD INCONE DISTRIBUTION PROJECT DATA ON INCOME DISTRIBUTION IN NEPAL. Satish Kansal. Division Working Paper No March 1981

Amount and Sources of Income of Older Households in Mexico

THE 1990s IN LATIN AMERICA: ANOTHER DECADE OF PERSISTENT INEQUALITY, BUT WITH SOMEWHAT LOWER POVERTY MIGUEL SZÉKELY *

THE AGING OF THE CUBAN POPULATION

STUDY ON SOME PROBLEMS IN ESTIMATING CHINA S GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT

A QUICK GUIDE TO RESEARCHING TAX EXPENDITURES IN LATIN AMERICA. By Jean Ross, Consultant

Table 1 sets out national accounts information from 1994 to 2001 and includes the consumer price index and the population for these years.

Social Gains Show Signs of Stagnation in Latin America

- Appendix A. Allocation rules. Income, taxes and expenditures - Appendix B. Argentina: summary of public budget statistics

Socioeconomic Differences in the Distribution by Age of Public Transfers in Mexico

How Good is Growth? James Foster and Miguel Székely

ANNEX I. Schedule of El Salvador. Obligations Concerned: National Treatment (Article 10.3) Most-Favored-Nation Treatment (Article 10.

WHY TIME DEFICITS MATTER: APPENDICES

Volume Title: Studies in Income and Wealth. Volume URL: Chapter Author: Neal Potter, David Rosenblatt

ECON 256: Poverty, Growth & Inequality. Jack Rossbach

SWP395. ncome ld'istribution and Poverty in MezD(c( Wovid. Bank Staff Working Paper No June 1980

The Argentine Economy in the year 2006

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND INCOME DISTRIBUTION IN ARGENTINA

Héctor R. Gertel Roberto Giuliodori Paula F. Auerbach Alejandro F. Rodríguez. July 2001

A GUIDE TO SEDLAC SOCIO-ECONOMIC DATABASE FOR LATIN AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN. CEDLAS * and The World Bank **

Indiana Lags United States in Per Capita Income

Costa Rica. Migrant domestic workers

THE EVOLUTION OF POVERTY IN RWANDA FROM 2000 T0 2011: RESULTS FROM THE HOUSEHOLD SURVEYS (EICV)

THE IMPACT OF TAXES AND SOCIAL SPENDING ON INEQUALITY AND POVERTY IN ARGENTINA, BOLIVIA, BRAZIL, MEXICO AND PERU: A SYNTHESIS OF RESULTS

PART 4 - ARMENIA: SUBJECTIVE POVERTY IN 2006

SOCIAL SPENDING AND INCOME REDISTRIBUTION IN ARGENTINA DURING THE 2000S: THE RISING ROLE OF NONCONTRIBUTORY PENSIONS

Minimum wage violations in a dual labor market with multiple floors

Online Appendix of. This appendix complements the evidence shown in the text. 1. Simulations

Global Tax Alert. Costa Rica proposes farreaching. Income Tax Law

Work as it should be!

Cont, Walter, Porto, Alberto, and Juarros, Pedro (2016). Regional Income Redistribution and Risk-sharing: Lessons from Argentina

American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

TAUSSIG DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE JUSTIFICATION STUDY CITY OF ESCALON. Public Finance Public Private Partnerships Urban Economics Clean Energy Bonds

FISCAL POLICY, INEQUALITY AND THE ETHNIC DIVIDE IN GUATEMALA Maynor Cabrera, Nora Lustig and Hilicías Morán COMMITMENT TO EQUITY

Components of the Income Aggregate:

Poverty and Inequality in the Countries of the Commonwealth of Independent States

Ensayos Revista de Economía, 37(1), 1-42, Mayo 2018 DOI:

Poverty and Inequality Reduction Strategy in Colombia. How is it measured? La noche de los pobres. Diego Rivera

Economics 448: Lecture 14 Measures of Inequality

n np SWP460 Incidence of Poverty and the Characteristics of the Poor in Peninsular Malaysia, 1973 World Bank Staff Working Paper No.

ESTIMATES OF PRIVATE SECTOR WEALTH. Tim Callen. Research Discussion Paper October Economic Analysis Department. Reserve Bank of Australia

Inequality in China: Recent Trends. Terry Sicular (University of Western Ontario)

WIDER Working Paper 2017/177. Tax-benefit microsimulation and income redistribution in Ecuador. H. Xavier Jara 1 and Marcelo Varela 2

Percentiles One way to look at quartile points is to say that, for a sorted list of values, Q 1 is the value that has 25% of the rest of the values

Supplemental Information. Peru: Living Standards Measurement Survey 1994

60% of household expenditures on housing, food and transport

Effects of the Australian New Tax System on Government Expenditure; With and without Accounting for Behavioural Changes

Measuring and Monitoring Health Equity

research brief The Expansion of Non-Contributory Transfers in Uruguay in Recent Years 1

CONSUMPTION POVERTY IN THE REPUBLIC OF KOSOVO April 2017

Gross Domestic Product of Georgia in 2015

The Economic Situation and Income Inequality among the Older People in Japan: Measurement by Quasi Public Assistance Standard 1

Over the five year period spanning 2007 and

2006 Family Income and Expenditure Survey (Final Results)

MEASUREMENT AND CHARACTERIZATION OF THE MIDDLE CLASS IN LATIN AMERICA 1

PSIA in Practice. An insight into the distributional impacts of policy making

SCHEDULE OF THE REPUBLIC OF EL SALVADOR ANNEX I: NON-CONFORMING MEASURES. Most-Favored-Nation Treatment (Article 10.04)

PUBLIC DISCLOSURE. June 4, 2012 COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT ACT PERFORMANCE EVALUATION. Utah Independent Bank RSSD #

THE CHANGING SIZE DISTRIBUTION OF U.S. TRADE UNIONS AND ITS DESCRIPTION BY PARETO S DISTRIBUTION. John Pencavel. Mainz, June 2012

Madhya Pradesh. Poverty, Growth & Inequality

Reduction of informal employment in Uruguay: policies and outcomes

Wealth Inequality in the Netherlands: Observed vs Capitalized Wealth

A price model to assess the effects of European Regional Development. Fund in Andalusia

Income inequality and the growth of redistributive spending in the U.S. states: Is there a link?

The World Bank Income Support and Employability Project (P117440)

Determinants of Vulnerability to Climate Change: Analysis of Municipalities in Mexico

Stata as a tool for transparency and statistics dissemination: measuring multidimensional poverty in México

METHODOLOGICAL ISSUES IN POVERTY RESEARCH

Components of the Income Aggregate: Encuesta de Condiciones de Vida, Guatemala 2000

Background Paper No. 2 THE DISTRIBUTIONAL IMPACT OF SOCIAL EXPENDITURE:CHILE

Trends in income and consumption inequality in Bolivia: A fairy tale of growing dwarfs and shrinking giants Draft - Public disclosure unauthorized

THE DEVELOPMENT AND STRUCTURE OF POVERTY IN MONTEVIDEO, URUGUAY, 1983 TO 1992

Recursos de Vivienda en el Condado de Pasquotank

ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COUNCIL

Income Distribution, Household Debt and Aggregate Demand: A Critical Appraisal

Population. Life expectancy at birth (women)

OPEN BUDGET QUESTIONNAIRE GUATEMALA

Part One. Economic Developments of Iran in 1394

Mexico is among the most unequal countries in the world. 1 However, it is

Documentos de trabajo. The distribution of income in Uruguay: the effects of economic and institutional reforms. C. Gradín & M.

MONTENEGRO. Name the source when using the data

Mexico in the 1990s: the Main Cross-Sectional Facts

Guatemala Poverty in Guatemala

Components of the Income Aggregate: Encuesta de Niveles de Vida, Nicaragua

IPCevaluationnote. Debating Targeting Methods for Cash Transfers: A Multidimensional Index vs. an Income Proxy for Paraguay s Tekoporã Programme

The distributional impact of reforms to direct and indirect tax in El Salvador Analytical Report and Results*

Spain:'Estimates'of'Top'Income'Shares' ,' and'revision'for' ' ' ' Facundo(Alvaredo( and(luis(estévez(bauluz( ( ( September(2014' (

How to use ADePT for Social Protection Analysis

Monitoring Socio-Economic Conditions in Argentina, Chile, Paraguay and Uruguay CHILE. Paula Giovagnoli, Georgina Pizzolitto and Julieta Trías *

Instructions for Reproducing Productivity Differences Between and Within Countries

Sources: Surveys: Sri Lanka Consumer Finance and Socio-Economic Surveys (CFSES) 1953, 1963, 1973, 1979 and 1982

POVERTY ANALYSIS IN MONTENEGRO IN 2013

Transcription:

Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized EPD INCOME DISTRIBUTION PROJECT DATA ON THEl Jong-goo Park DISTRIBUTION OF INCOME IN EL SALVADOR Divisi'on Working Paper No.1980-7 October 1980 Economic and Social Data Division Economic Analysis and Projections Department Development Policy Staff The World Bank Division Working Papers report on work in progress and are circulated for Bank staff use to stimulate discussion and comment. The views and interpretations in a Working Paper are those of the author and may not be attributed to the World Bank or its affiliated organizations. DRAFT

DATA ON THE DISTRIBUTION OF INCOME IN EL SALVADOR This paper contains an evaluation of the data on the distribution of income in El Salvador from a 1976/77 survey of household budgets. The paper then adjusts data from the survey, and derives a more representative distribution of income for the country by household. ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL DATA DIVISION ECONOMIC ANALYSIS AND PROJECTIONS DEPARTMENT OCTOBER 1980

TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. Introduction...... 1 II. The 1976/77 Survey of Household Budgets (ENPF). 2 III. Evaluation of the 1976/77 ENPF........... 2 IV. Data Adjustment and Estimation of Household Income Distribution..... 4 Appendix Tables............... 8

DATA ON THE DISTRIBUTION OF INCOME IN EL SALVADOR I. Introduction 1. This paper briefly reviews the data on the distribution of income in El Salvador and evaluates the country's 1976/77 survey of household budgets. It then derives an estimate of income distribution in El Salvador by household for 1976/77. 2. There are two national surveys which provide information on income distribution in El Salvador. One is the 1975 Encuesta Nacional de Mano de Obra y Aspectos Demograficos (ENMOAD). It was a national survey on the labor force and on demographics, and provides data on distribution of income for individual income earners for the period April-June 1975 (Appendix Table A-1). The second survey is the 1976/77 Encuesta Nacional de Presupuestos Familiars (ENPF), a national surve' of household budgets which provides data on income distribution by household for the whole country. 3. The final report on the ENPF survey has not yet been published. Preliminary reports / include data on distribution of income by individual income earner, by household, and by household member (per capita household income). A summary of the data on per capita distribution of income (with households classified into percentile groups and ranked according to per capita income) /1 Ministerio de Planificacion y Coordinacion, Banco Central de Reserva and Direccion General de Estadistica y Census, Caracteristicas de los Hogares y delas Viviendas, San Salvador, May 1979; " t Distribucion del Ingreso por Deciles de Perceptores," (mimeo), November 1978; "'Algunos Resultados de la Encuesta Nacional de Presupuestos Familiares (1976-77) y Calculo de Coefficientes de Elasticidad-Ingreso del Gasto, de los Principales Subgrupos de Articulos Consumidos por las Familias Salvadorenas," (mimeo), undated; ttmuestra de Hogares," (mimeo), April 1978.

was published in the 1980 Social Indicators Data Sheets of the World Bank.. II. The 1976/77 Survey of Household Budgets (ENPF) 4. The 1976/77 ENPF was conducted by the Planning Ministry (Ministerio de Planificacion y Coordinacion del Desarrollo Economico y Social) in collaboration with the Central Bank and National Statistics and Census Office, between August 1976 and July 1977. Its purpose was to obtain information on household income and expenditures, consumption patterns, employment, levels of education and characteristics of dwellings. 5. The survey sample contained 3,227 private house-holds, about 0.4% of the total private households in the country. A household was defined as including one or more persons, not necessarily related, sharing the same dwelling and contributing to a common budget. Household income was defined as the after-tax income of all members of the household, including income both in cash and in kind, transfers, imputed rents from owner-occupied dwellings and production consumed by the producer. III. Evaluation of the 1976/77 ENPF Under-Reporting of Income 6. The 1976/77 ENPF data on distribution of per capita household income shows that El Salvador's total household income amounted to 3,658.4 million colones for an estimated population of 4.29 million in 1976/77./2 The population estimates derived from the survey is comparable to that of 4.11 million derived from other official sources. /3 As a rough check on the total household /1 Shail Jain's Size Distribution of Income (World Bank, 1975) includes a few estimates of El Salvador's income distribution for earlier years. Data used for these estimates were not available Lor evaluation of the estimates. /2 See the Appendix, Tables A-2, A-3 and A-4 for the original ENPF data. /3 Ministerio de Planificacion y Coordinacion and Latin American Demographic Center.

-3- income yielded by the survey, that figure was compared with private consumption expenditures derived from the country's national accounts. The former was 83 percent of the latter. This implies that income was under-reported in the survey, since private consumption expenditures are expected to be less than aggregate personal income in El Salvador (see Table 1, below). 7. Because of the lack of data on average household income by income class, it was not possible to assess directly the under-reporting of income by different income classes. Preliminary data obtained for only a part (August- October 1976) of the whole survey period provide average household income and expenditures by broad income classes. These data show that as average household income increases, the expenditure-income ratio decreases until there is a sudden rise in the 'top" income class (average monthly income of over 1,000 colones) (Table 1). There is no evidence of under-reporting of expenditures by the "top" income class. This suggests relatively greater under-reporting of income by this class, since its average savings ratio is normally expected to be the highest (or the expenditure-income ratio the lowest) of the classes in the country. /1 A more proper comparison would have been between total household income derived from survey data and personal income from the national accounts. There were not enough data to derive the latter in El Salvador. Since in the national acconts, private consumption expenditures are normally less than personal income, certainly household income, which is less than private consumption expenditures, will also be less than the national accounts personal income.

-4 Table 1: AVERAGE HOUSEHOLD MONTHLY INCOME AND EXPENDITURES, 1976/77 Income Class Percentage of Average Average (colones) Households Income (Y) Expenditure (C) C/Y 0-99 12;6 67.5 101.1 1r50 100-199 28.7 146.8 155.0 1.06 200-299 18.6 244.8 238.2 0.97 300-599 24.5 406.7 341.8 0.84 600-999 9.6 746.3 594.2 0.80 1,000 + 6.0 1,621.8 1,453.3 0.90 TOTAL 100.0 358.0 325.5 0.91 Source: Encesta Nacional de Presupuestos Familiares, first trimester (August-October 1976), preliminary results. 8. Zero income was reported by 1,736 urban households (0.5% of total urban households)./- However, the data show that 590 out of the 1,738 households owned an automobile, refrigerator and telephone, indicating quite comfortable living. This, together with the fact that household income in the survey included transfers and income in kind, implies non-reporting of income. IV. Data Adjustment and Estimation of Household Income Distribution 9. The 19.76/77 ENPF data on income distribution by household include only distribution of households by income classes (Appendix, Table A-5). For all income classes except the lowest and the highest, average household income was assumed to be equal to the median of the corresponding income range (Appendix, Table A-6). /1 Caracteristicas de los Hogares y de las Viviendas, op. cit., Tables N4, N5 and N6.

-5-10. For thre highest and open-ended class of urban households, average household income was derived by the use of an estimated Pareto coefficient. Multiplying this average income by the ratio between average incomes of rural and urban high income classes, the average income of the highest rural income class was derived. This average income ratio was derived from survey data for the three months, August - October 1976.'! 11. For the lowest rural income class (monthly income less than 50 colones), the. estimate of average household income was based on the median income of the next lowest income class (between 50 and 99 colones) and the reported average income (68.4 colones) for a class combining the two. For the urban area, the 590 households reporting zero income but owning automobiles were reclassified into the 300 - automobile ownership became apparent. 599 colon income class where private The average income of the remaining 1,146 households reporting zero income was assumed to be equal to that of the lowest income urban class, in turn assumed to be equal to the average earnings of a worker in the lowest paid urban job (the latter was estimated using data from the 1975 national employment survey CENMOAD), taking into account increases in domestic food prices between 19.75 and 1977). 12. Using the average household incomes as derived in paragraphs 9 to 11 above, income distribution was estimated for 1976/77 (Appendix, Table A-8). " Income distribution by decile household groups was then derived in addition, as follows: /1 See the Appendix,Table A-7 for survey data on average household income by urban and rural areas for the period August-October 1976. /2 Total household income derived from these adjusted data was 88 percent of the private consumption expenditures in the national accounts for 1976/77,

Table 2: HOUSEHOLD INCOME DISTRIBUTION,1976/77 ADJUSTED Cumulative % Cumulative % of Household Income/a ol Households Urbani Rural National 10 1.7 2.3 1.7 20 4.4 5.8 5.0 30 7.9 11.2 8.7 40 12.4 16.6 12.4 50 19.8 22.0 18.3 60 27.8 29.4 24.6 70 35.8 38.4 35.7 80 48.7 51.5 46.8 90 65.0 67.7 63.1 (95) (78.4) (77.1) (75.2) 100 100.0 100.0 100.0 Gini Coefficient 0.58 0.42 0.48 /a Derived from the Appendix Table A-8,by linear interpolation between two adjacent income classes. 13. The adjusted data on which the estimates of income distribution are based may be open to some criticisms. Notwithstanding these critic'sms, the following conclusions about income distribution can be safely made: - Household income is distributed more equally in rural than in urban areas (Table 2); and - The inequality in the distribution of income appears to be greater when households are ranked by income for the entire household, as opposed to per capita household income (Table 3). The latter approximates income distribution by household when adjusted for differences in household size,

-7- Table 3: INCOME INEQUALITY MEASURES FOR 1976/77 - Income Share (%) Income Share (M) Gini of Lowest 20% of of Highest 20% of Data Source Coefficient Income Group Income Group Adjusted ENPF (distribution of households ranked according to household income) 0.48 5.0 53.2 Original ENPF (Social Indicators Sheets) (distribution of households ranked according to per capita household income) 0.40 5.8 47.7

Table A-1:-EL SALVADOR--TOTAL EMPLOYMENT BY SECTORS AND INCOME LEVELS, 1975 (in percentages) Electrici- Transp,ort Income level ty, Gas Construc- and Commu- Financial Serxvices Unspe- (colones) Agriculture Mining Industry and Water tion Commerce nications Services cified w/o renumneration 147.4 23.1 9.4 1.9 4.2 8.h 1.2 0.0 3.2 50.1 I - 39 3.7 0.0 12.8 0.0 3.0 14.0 1.9 0.0 i6.o 3.2 40-99 29.7 23'.l 21.5 8.7 18.8 27.3 14.14 2.8 26.9 27.4 1 100-100 15.2 23.1 36.6 28.3 48.6 24.5 34.3 17.8 19.0 11.0 200-299 1.5 15.4 10.7 23.1 i8.6 10.4 18.5 18.3 12.5 4.1 300-399 0.7 15.3 3.8 11.1 4.0.7.0 17.2 18.4 10.5 0.0 40O - 599 o.6 o.o. 2.7 15.8 1.2 3.8 8.3 17.2 6.2 4.1 6oC - 999 0.3 0.0 1.1 8.3 0.9 2.4 1.7 11.9 2.9 0.0 1000-1999 o.6 0.0 0.9. 2.8 0.5 1.4 2. 8.5 1.5 0.0 2000 and Over 0.3 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.2 0.8 0.4 5.1 0.5 0.0 TOTAL 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 Total Prequency 586,016 1,742 120,650 4,307 48,,853-212,155 29,663 6,998 207,011 2,888 (No. of wor-kers) ~t Note: Columns may not total because of rounding. Source: Encuesta Nacional de Manio de Obra y Aspectos Demograficos, April-July, 1975.

Appendix -9- Table A-2 DISTRIBUTION OF URBAN HOUSEHOLD INCOME, BY PERCENTILE HOUSEHOLD GROUPS, RANKED ACCORDING TO PER CAPITA HOUSEHOLD-INCOME, 1976/77 Per Capita Total Household Income Household Income Households (1,OO. - - (coloties/month) No. % colones/month) % 0.0-27.7 36,104 10 4,116.7 2.1 27.7-42.1 36,120 10 6,473.6 3.4 42.1-55.0 36,118 10 9,876.9 5.1 55.0-70.0 35,972 10 11,100.9 5.8 70. 0 86.6 36,138 10 14,034.0 7.3 86.6-109.3 36,219 10 17,401.3 9.1 109.3-140.0 35,856 10 20,424.5 10.6 140.1-182.3 36,207 10 24,389.6 12.7 182.3-262.5 36,053 10 26,396.0 13.7 262.5-1,885.5 36,364 10 57,890.2 30.1 TOTAL 361,151 100 192,103.3 100 Source: "Muestra de Hogares," op. cit. p.11.

Appendix - 10 - Table A-3 DISTRIBUTION OF RURAL HOUSEHOLD INCOME, BY PERCENTILE HOUSEHOLD GROUPS, RANKED ACCORDING TO PER CAPITA HOUSEHOLD INCOME, 1976/77 Per Capita Total Household Income Household Income Households (1,000- (colones/month) No. % colones/month) % 0.0-14.0 43,554 10 3,092.1 2.7 14.0-19.6 43,762 10 5,156.*6 4.6 19.6 24.4 43,629 10 6,306.5 5.6 24.4-29.1 43,699 10 7,520.0 6.7 29.1-36.0 43,695 10 8,923.7 7.9 36.0-42.4 43,695 10 10,064.0 8.9 42.4 51.2 43,813 10 11,570.7 10.3 51.2-66.3 43,660 10 13,240.3 11.7 66.3-96.5 43,658 10 16,170.3 14.3 96.5-3,458.2 43,890 10 30,721.7 27.2 TOTAL 437,055 100 112,765.9 100 Source: "Muestra de Hogares," op. cit.

Appendix 11 - Table A-4 DISTRIBUTION OF NATIONAL HOUSEHOLD INCOME, BY PERCENTILE HOUSEHOLD GROUPS, RANKED ACCORDING TO PER CAPITA HOUSEHOLD INCOME, 1976/77 Per Capita Total Household Income Household Income Households (1,000 (colones/month) No. Colones/mor.th) % 0.0-17.1 79,795 10 6,401.0 2.1 17.1-24.6 79,810 10 11,182.7 3.7 24.6-32.4 79,677 10 14,075.2 4.6 32.4 40.5 79,865 10 16,453.7 5.4 40.5-50.6 79,910 10 20,526.7 6.7 50.6-64.3 79,701 10 24,323.6 8.0 64.3-85.0 79,784 10 27,712.5 9.1 85.0-120.0 79,763 10 38,669.4 12.7 120.0-187.5 79,909 10 50,074.3 16.4 187.5-3,458.2 79,992 10 95,450.2 31.3 TOTAL 798,206 100 304,869.3 100 Source: "Muestra de Hogares," op. cit. p.6.

Appendix - 12 - -able A-S: DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLDS BY INCOME CLASSES, 1976/77 Monthly Urban Rural National Income Class -Nor of % of No. of % of No. of % of (colones) Households Households Households Households Households Households 0 1,736 0.5 - - 1,736 0.2 1-49 5,390 1.5 18,532 4.2 23,922 3.0 50-99 18,925 5.2 55,908 12.8 74,833 9.4 100 199 64,840 17.9 163,521 37.4 228,361 28.6 200-299 60,560 16.8 87,252 20.0 147,812 18.5 300-599 109,202 30.2 85,740 19.6 194,942 24.4 600-999 58,049 16.1 18,679 4.3 76,728 9.6 1,000-1,999 32,400 9.0 5,309 1.2 37,709 4.7 2,000-3,999 8,574 2.4 1,451 0.3 10,025 1.3 4,000 + 1,475 o.4 663 0.2 2,138 0.3 LOTAL 361,151 100 437,055 100 798,206 100 Source: Caracteristicas de los Hogares y de las Viviendas, op. cit., Tables N.1 - V.1.

Appendix - 13 - Table A-6: DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLDS BY LEVEL OF AVERAGE HOUSEHOLD MONTHLY INCOME, 1976/77 (ADJUSTED) Urban Rural National Ave. Income No. of Ave. Income No. of Ave. Income No. of (colones) Households (colones) Households (colones) Households 62 6,536 49 18,532 52 25,068 75 18,925 75 55,908 75 74,883 150 64,840 150 163,521 150 228,361 250 60,560 250 87,252 250 147,812 450 109,792 450 85,740 450 195,532 800 58,049 800 18,679 800 76,728 1,500 32,400 1,500 5,309 1,500 37,709 2,500 8,574 2,500 1,451 2,500 10,025 6,692 1,475 6,933 663 6,767 2,138 Note: The average household income was derived from Table A-5, except for the lowest and highest classes. For those, see paragraphs 11 and 12 in the text.

Appendix - 14 - Table A-7: AVERAGE HOUSEHOLD INCOME BY URBAN AND RURAL AREAS, AUGUST - OCTOBER 1976 Monthly Urban Rural Income Class Percentage of Ave. Income Percentage of Ave. Income (colones) Households (c;olones/month) Households (colones/month) 0 -~ 99 6.3 64.6 17. 2 68.4 100-129 17.8 148.3 388.4 146.3 200-299 19.8 243.6 22.1 245.7 300 599 29.1 425.5 17.6 382.4 600-999 15.2 751.2 2.8 725.66 1,000 + 11.8 1,574.8 1.9 1,846.6 TOTAL 100 502.0-100- 245.4 Source: "Algunos Resultados de la Encuesta Nacional de Presupuestos Familiares (1976-1977)...," op. cit., Tables 1-A and 1-B.

Table A-8: DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLD INCOME, 1976/77'- (ADJUSTED) URBAN RURAL NATIONAL % of % of % of Average % of Household Average % of Household Average % of Household Income Households Income Income Households Income Income Households Income 62 1.8 0.2 49 4.2 0.7 52 3.1 0.4 75 5.2 0.7 75 12.8 3.5 75 9.4 1.8 150 18.0 4.8 150 37.4 20.2 150 28.6 10.6 250 16.8 7.5 250 20.0 18.0 250 18.5 11.4 450 30.4 24.4 450 19.6 31.8 450 24.5 27.2 800 16.1 22.9 800. 4.3 12.3 800 9.6 19.0 1,500 9.0 24.0 1,500 1.2 6.6 1,500 4.7 17.5 2,500 2.4 10.6 2,500 0.3 3.0 2,500 1.3 7.7 6,692 0.4 4.9 6,933 0.2 3.8 6,767 0.3 4.5 TOTAL 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 /a Derived from Table A-7. Note: Columns may not total because of rounding