being bold A radical approach to raising revenue and defeating the deficit

Similar documents
HMRC fast facts. Record revenues for the UK. May 2014 Bulletin

Tackling offshore tax evasion: Strengthening civil deterrents for offshore evaders

119.4bn. The tax gap. Public and Commercial Services Union pcs.org.uk. Tax evasion in 2014 and what can be done about it

AAT RESPONSE TO HMRC CONSULTATION DOCUMENT ON TACKLING OFFSHORE TAX EVASION: STRENGTHENING CIVIL DETERRENTS (RELEASED 19 AUGUST 2014)

IAP Conference Bangkok Asset Recovery in Major Fraud and Corruption Cases: The SFO s Recent Experience

Behavioural challenge

Lucy Sutcliffe Fiscal Crime Liaison Officer Pretoria, South Africa

HMRC Memorandum to the Main Estimate

Gift Aid and reliefs on donations

Our ref COMM LIT/OPEN/-1/TIHA OH ZO'I5 Your ref

8 TH EUROPEAN HEALTHCARE FRAUD AND CORRUPTION NETWORK ANNUAL CONFERENCE 6 TH -7 TH OCTOBER KRAKOW

1 Introduction. 2 Executive summary

REPORT BY THE COMPTROLLER AND AUDITOR GENERAL HC 226 SESSION JUNE HM Revenue & Customs. Progress in tackling tobacco smuggling

Reducing Fraud and Error in the UK. David Barr Head of Fraud and Error Strategy

Confiscation orders: progress review

New UK Corporate Offences of Failure to Prevent the Facilitation of Tax Evasion

Tax avoidance: tackling marketed avoidance schemes. HM Revenue & Customs

James Sale Project Officer, Pharmaceuticals & Healthcare Programme (PHP) Transparency International UK

APPENDIX 2 CORPORATE ANTI-FRAUD AND CORRUPTION STRATEGY

Association of Accounting Technicians response to Tackling offshore tax evasion: Civil sanctions for enablers of offshore evasion

Tackling Benefit Fraud

Measuring tax gaps 2017 edition Tax gap estimates for

Countering Fraud in Student Funding Catherine Haggerty Team Manager

Member States capabilities in fighting tax crimes

Report by the Comptroller and. SesSIon July Reducing Costs in HM Revenue & Customs

An Inspector Calls A Practical Guide to Surviving an HMRC Investigation

Impact Assessment (IA) Summary: Intervention and Options. Title:

NFA response to government consultation on social housing fraud

~~L-~ ~at. Impact Assessment (la) Summary: Intervention and Options. RPC Opinion: RPC Opinion Status. < 20 No

REPORT BY THE COMPTROLLER AND AUDITOR GENERAL HC 597 SESSION OCTOBER Cross government. Managing budgeting in government

JOSEPH GALLAGHER LTD CRIMINAL FINANCES ACT (ANTI-TAX EVASION) POLICY. Introduction

Fraud and Error in the Social Security System

Tax and the Rule of Law

The UK s Corporate Offence of Failure to Prevent the Facilitation of Tax Evasion TTN Conference New York

Topical Tax Investigations 2016

Failure to prevent the facilitation of tax evasion

STEP response to the consultation: Tackling offshore tax evasion: a requirement to notify HMRC of offshore structures, published 5 December 2016

ANTI-FACILITATION OF TAX EVASION POLICY

New Corporate Offences of Failing to Prevent the Facilitation of Tax Evasion:

LRS Anti-Tax Evasion Policy

Tackling fraud and error in the benefit and tax credits systems

Challenges arising from the UK Criminal Finances Act 2017 GEZ OWEN MANAGING DIRECTOR & GENERAL COUNSEL HUBBIS

Report by the Comptroller and Auditor General

Scrutiny Timetable The Scottish Government s Draft Budget is subject to scrutiny by the Scottish Parliament Finance Committee, before being

Why you need Essential Business Legal Solutions

Progress on reducing costs

Fighting Fraud Locally

Automatic enrolment to workplace pensions

Tackling offshore tax evasion: Strengthening civil deterrents

STEP Response - Tax Avoidance and Evasion Inquiry

1 Introduction. 2 Executive summary

Report by the Comptroller and. SesSIon July Reducing Costs in HM Revenue & Customs

tax notes Volume 150, Number 11 March 14, 2016

ANTI-TAX EVASION POLICY

Report. by the Comptroller and Auditor General. Criminal Justice System. Confiscation orders

The Misuse and Smuggling of Hydrocarbon Oils

Most of our clients are individuals or small and medium-sized businesses (or both). The headlines affecting them are as follows:

EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM TO THE SERIOUS CRIME ACT 2007 (SPECIFIED ANTI-FRAUD ORGANISATIONS) ORDER No. 2353

BY February TO: All NHS provider CEOs. Dear Colleague LOCUM AND AGENCY SPEND

Offshore Compliance Advisory Committee

Association of Accounting Technicians response to HM Revenue and Customs consultation Tackling tax evasion: legislation and guidance for a corporate

Important document please read. Stakeholder Pension

PUBLIC REGISTERS OF BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP JERSEY FINANCE LIMITED 31 MARCH 2017

SUBMISSION FROM UNISON SCOTLAND

Bar Council response to the consultation paper on Tackling offshore tax evasion: A new criminal offence

Overview of the 2015 Spending Review

Closing the tax gap: HMRC s record at ensuring tax compliance: Government Response to the Committee's Twenty-ninth Report of Session

Policies, Procedures, Guidelines and Protocols. Document Details. Anti-Fraud, Bribery and Corruption Strategy

Anti-facilitation of Tax Evasion Policy

The cost of running government departments

Transfer Pricing Risk Assessment The UK approach. 8 March 2012

Briefing: Financial Guidance and Claims Bill

LONDON BOROUGH OF BEXLEY BEXLEY S PERSONAL BUDGET POLICY. 1. Background

Election 2017: Labour Manifesto

NEW UK CRIMINAL OFFENCES OF FAILURE TO PREVENT FACILITATION OF TAX EVASION

Main Estimate Explanatory Memorandum: Response to the Committee s Questions

2016 AUTUMN STATEMENT

Reimagine local authority funding Using our best disruptive thinking to achieve public policy goals

By Stephen Wright. PUBLISHED: 21:36 GMT, 6 June 2013 UPDATED: 21:39 GMT, 6 June 2013

Protection of Vulnerable Groups (Scotland) Act 2007

Summary: Analysis & Evidence Policy Option 1

1 Introduction. 2 Executive summary

THE TAX GAP FOR CORPORATION TAX

Ignorance is bliss, but taxes are nothing to ignore, even when owed to a foreign government

HFMU INVESTIGATOR TRAINING INDABA OPENING AND WELCOME

FORUM ON TAX ADMINISTRATION

Tackling offshore tax evasion A requirement to notify HMRC of offshore structures: CIOT Comments 27 February 2017

Principal Civil Service Pension Scheme. Consultation on proposed increases to employee contribution rates effective from April 2013

Stemming the Flood? Assessing the UK Government s policy on tax avoidance since Budget 2008

IMG case reveals elephant traps when closing to future accrual?

Taxes and benefits: the parties plans

Impact Assessment (IA)

Continuing Professional Development (CPD)

Draft Registration of Overseas Entities Bill

TAXJUSTICE.UK TAXTAKES. Perspectives on building a better tax system to benefit everyone in the UK

Tim Humphreys ABI. The Insurance Industry s role in Tackling Fire and Arson

The Financial Intelligence Service

Foreword by the Board

SPRING STATEMENT 2018

Tax update. News items. Case reports. December 2017

Transcription:

being bold A radical approach to raising revenue and defeating the deficit

being boldiintroduction The Government aims to reduce the massive budget deficit by cutting public expenditure and raising taxes. We believe there is a bolder and more radical option to defeat the deficit: raising revenue by using skilled tax professionals to close the tax gap and ensure that everyone pays their fair share. This report explains why we believe this innovative approach is one the Government should adopt.

being bold EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Association of Revenue and Customs (ARC) ARC is part of the FDA, representing senior tax professionals and managers who work in HMRC. These are the senior tax inspectors, accountants, lawyers, policy makers and managers who implement the Government s policies, draft tax laws and administer the tax system fairly. ARC members are highly skilled and trained, bringing in the money to fund public services for the benefit of everyone living in the UK. The Deficit: the Government s approach, and ARC s bolder option Faced with a massive budget deficit the approach of the Government has been to ask: how and where can we find ways to cut expenditure? As part of the Spending Review HMRC, like all other Civil Service departments, has had to submit plans based on a 25% and 40% budget reduction. While HMRC can be made more efficient, identifying and implementing efficiencies alone will not provide the solution to reducing the deficit. The question should not be simply one of how do we save money?, but also one of how can we generate more income? And that s where HMRC and ARC members in particular, can play a crucial role in raising revenue and defeating the deficit.

THE CHALLENGE THE DEFICIT The UK faces a massive budget deficit of 175 billion. The Government aims to reduce this deficit by cutting public expenditure and raising taxes in the ratio of four to one every 1 of additional taxes will be matched by 4 of public expenditure cuts. These cuts are set to hit all government departments including HM Revenue and Customs. It is through HMRC that the government raised 435 billion last year to fund schools, hospitals and other vital public services. But cutting staff numbers in HMRC threatens to reduce the amount of taxes and duties collected putting further pressure on public finances. Any private organisation facing the need to repay debts would protect and enhance its main profit centre. We believe the government should be increasing the resources of its main revenue raising department. The work undertaken by ARC members is highly cost effective. The amounts recovered range from 30 times salary cost to over 180 times salary cost. An ARC member earning 50,000 a year would expect to bring in over 1.5m to the exchequer. Each ARC member can generate enough money to pay the salaries of 50 nurses working in the NHS, or pay all the teachers in a mediumsized school.

THE SOLUTION Raising Revenue to Generate Income 50bn+ tax gap Every developed country has a tax gap. This is the difference between the amount of taxes and duties due under the laws made by Parliament and the amount that is paid voluntarily by taxpayers. HMRC estimates the size of the UK tax gap at over 50bn. At a time when everyone in the UK is being asked to take drastic action to reduce the deficit it cannot be right that almost one third of that deficit is caused by individuals and companies who cheat the system. This cheating can take a number of forms; including avoidance, evasion and attacks by criminal gangs. But, whatever form the cheating takes, the result is the same; there is less money to pay for vital services such as schools and hospitals and honest taxpayers end up paying more. The gap is equivalent to an extra 1,000 of tax for every adult in the country. David Gauke, Exchequer Secretary, said in Parliament recently: The issue of the tax gap is important for the Government. [the gap] has been brought into even sharper relief by the dreadful state of the public finances there is a public mood for people to do the right thing and to play by the rules, and that includes paying the taxes that are due under the law. Yet the government s proposals to impose further cuts on HMRC threaten to increase the size of the tax gap, not reduce it. We believe that government action is needed now to address this unfair drag on public finances. Closing the tax gap ARC members are at the forefront of HMRC s work to tackle the cheats who deprive the public purse of over 50bn every year. And they are incredibly successful in this work, bringing in an additional 12bn last year and helping to close the tax gap.

40 Tax Due Tax paid voluntarily Tax obtained via actions to close tax gap Outstanding tax gap 12 475 423 being bold Tax collected 2008/9 The 12bn recovered through HMRC s actions to tackle the tax cheats last year is over three times the total cost of running the department, including the cost of administering the tax processes and systems that collected 423bn from honest taxpayers. HMRC is amongst the most efficient tax agencies in the world. Tackling the tax cheats HMRC has developed a model which recognises that different groups have different behaviours, including; Those who want to pay the right tax at the right time. Those who break the rules when they think they can get away with it. Those who deliberately and consistently cheat on their taxes. Criminal gangs who mount organised attacks on the tax system. HMRC has developed a range of responses to tackle the different groups of tax cheats. Examples of these responses include: Requiring disclosure of avoidance schemes. Providing education and guidance for those who find it difficult to pay the right amount of tax. Making time to pay arrangements with those facing temporary cash-flow problems. An offshore disclosure scheme that encourages people to voluntarily pay tax on income hidden in overseas bank accounts. Prosecution of criminals who deliberately cheat the system.

HOW ARC members can generate income and contribute to defeating the deficit Skilled & cost-effective ARC members are highly skilled and trained and they deal with the largest and most complex cases. ARC members made a significant contribution towards closing the tax gap, bringing in the lion s share of the 12bn recovered last year. And the work is highly cost effective. The amount of additional tax recovered ranges from 30 to over 180 times the salary paid. Even at the lower end of this scale, an ARC member earning 50,000 could bring in an additional 1.5m each year. Put another way, each ARC member can generate enough money to pay the salaries of 50 nurses working in the NHS or pay for all the teachers at a medium sized school. There is a lasting impact from the work done by ARC members. The individual or company that is the subject of an intervention will pay the right amount of tax in future. And this work deters others who might be tempted to cheat, encouraging them

100000 500 99,179 94,225 475 90000 91,373 462 85,769 450 441 80000 436 77,162 425 73,695 70000 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 400 TOTAL STAFF HMRC Tax COLLECTED bn to pay the right tax at the right time. ARC members working to counter marketed avoidance schemes generate a further 8 of tax revenue for every 1 they collect from those who have taken part in the schemes. We know the ongoing impact of our checks is at least 50% of the amount collected. Taken together, the additional amount collected through deterring others is at least equal to the amount collected from the particular investigation; effectively doubling the benefit to the Exchequer. Some recent examples of the work done by ARC members include: a multinational corporation paid 1.25bn to settle a complex enquiry that had lasted over ten years. the offshore disclosure scheme has brought in over 500m in additional tax. the successful prosecution of a cheat who hid 140,000 in his aunt s grave in a bid to fool HMRC. a prison sentence for a fraudster who stole 559,000. successfully prosecuting the ringleader of a gang that laundered 30m of crime proceeds leading to a jail sentence of 10 years. A threat to what we do HMRC has already made substantial efficiency savings. In the last two years alone it has reduced costs by over 500m a year and reduced its staff by 15,000, or 18%. These cuts have continued, and today there are fewer than 69,000 in the Department. These cuts have been felt disproportionately in compliance work where the total spent has almost halved since 2006/7 ( 1.9bn compared with 3.6bn). It can be no coincidence that the money collected by HMRC has fallen by 25bn and the tax gap grew by 2.3bn in 2008/9. The reduction in expenditure means HMRC does not have the resources to do the job effectively. Because of staff cutbacks, tax investigators must focus on the highest yielding cases but are giving up a large number of smaller cases that could yield, in total, hundreds of millions of pounds. We are not able to follow up information on possible tax dodgers like those identified when HMRC obtained information about private fees paid to medical professionals. We are not able to pursue appropriate cases through the courts because of the lack of resources. Last year ARC members

being bold INVEST IN SUCCESS Far from reducing the amount spent on tackling tax cheats we believe the Government should be increasing resources to ensure everyone pays their fair share. The Canadian Government is often held up as a model of how to cut a fiscal deficit. But it recognised the importance of the principle of fairness in its administration of tax. When it was reducing public expenditure to cut the deficit between 1995 and 1998 it actually increased the amount spent on its tax audit programme. For every 1 spent on increasing front-line work to tackle tax cheats we know we can generate 30 of additional revenue and stop others taking 30 from revenue coffers. The Government should invest in key personnel in HMRC, its main revenue raising department: ARC members generate Income and can help Defeat the Deficit.

being bold Contacts and further information: ARC Prospect House 8 Leake Street London SE1 7NN 020 7401 5555 ARCCampaign2010@fda.org.uk www.arc-union.org.uk/deficit/ www.twitter.com/arc_union Graham Black (ARC President) 020 7401 5559 graham.black@fda.org.uk