The Agricultural Credit Market

Similar documents
FAST Tools Planning Beyond Paul Ellinger and Travis Farley Department of Agricultural and Consumer Economics University of Illinois

INSIGHTS FROM AGRICULTURAL LENDERS. January 11 th, 2019 Top Farmer Conference Beck Agricultural Center Dr. Brady Brewer

WHY WE AREN T LIKELY TO SEE A REPLAY OF THE 1980s FARM CRISIS

Financial Planning and Cash Flow Budgeting for 2006

Brady Brewer, Allen Featherstone, Christine Wilson, and Brian Briggeman Department of Agricultural Economics Kansas State University

Wages and Benefits for Farm. Employees - Results of an Iowa Survey File C1-60 More than 20,000 people make their.

FALL 2018 AGRICULTURAL LENDER SURVEY RESULTS

A Financial Analysis Program That Will PASS the Farm Manager Interest Test

APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS

Leverage of U.S. Farmers: A Deeper Perspective

AGRICULTURAL LENDER SURVEY. Spring 2018 Report

informational Bulletin PA Legislative Changes to Farmland Valuation FY June 2014 Illinois Department of Revenue

Monday, June 19, 2017 Ag Law Rooms: Ag Lien Update: Loan Workout Concerns and Lender Liability Issues in Today s Ag Economy 3:15 p.m.

Farm Business Analysis Ch.18

Trends Report Alternative Financial Services Lending Trends Insights into the Industry and Its Consumers

CREDIT IN A CHANGING ENVIRONMENT. Rick Nelson Vice President, Agribusiness

Financial Resources Available to Beginning Farmers. Peyton Fair Farm Credit Mid-America Les Humpal UT Extension Danny Morris UT Extension

Nebraska 2016 Farm Financial Health Survey

Farm and Family Living Income and Expenditures, 1998 through 2001

AgriBank, FCB and Affiliated Associations

Brady Brewer, Allen Featherstone, Christine Wilson, and Brian Briggeman Department of Agricultural Economics Kansas State University

Chapter URL:

2000 Sole Proprietor Financial Summary

Whole-Farm Reports. Farm Income Statement

AGRICULTURAL LENDER SURVEY RESULTS

There are multiple avenues of credit available to agricultural producers. Let s begin by identifying who can provide financing for your agricultural

Farmers have significantly increased their debt levels

University of Illinois

Agriculture & Business Management Notes...

Finance Implications of Intergenerational Transfer of US Farms. Freddie Barnard and Elizabeth Yeager. Introduction

AGRIBUSINESS SERVICES

1998 Income Management for Crop Farmers

Endowment Farms. Report for Year Ended December 31, 2012

ACCESS TO CREDIT OF FARM HOUSEHOLDS IN HAI DUONG PROVINCE, VIETNAM. Abstract

By: Freddie Barnard. Introduction. America. Approximately forty percent of low-population, completely rural counties in the

CROP BUDGETS, ILLINOIS, 2017

CROP BUDGETS, ILLINOIS, 2019

CROP BUDGETS, ILLINOIS, 2018

Testimony of. Matthew H. Williams AMERICAN BANKERS ASSOCIATION. Subcommittee on Department Operations, Oversight, and Credit.

Jason Henderson Vice President and Branch Executive Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City Omaha Branch April 10, 2012

A Sublette County Profile: Socioeconomics

Evaluating the Financial Viability of the Business

2018 ICBA Regulator Panel Agricultural Lending

Jason Henderson Vice President and Branch Executive Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City Omaha Branch January 27, 2010

MANAGING THE RISK CAPTURING THE OPPORTUNITY IN CROP FARMING. Michael Boehlje and Brent Gloy Center for Commercial Agriculture Purdue University

Course Materials THE FARM ECONOMY AND THE FUTURE OF AG LENDING

US. Farm Succession Plans and the Process of Transferring Land Ownership

AgriBank, FCB. Quarterly Report September 30, 2007 MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Case Study #1: Mixed Farm Operation - The Kattel Farm

Lenders require additional and more accurate information. Lenders are more thorough in analyzing and verifying information provided.

Saving Iowa s Ag Land Tax Dollars for Conservation

Financial Crisis Impact on Long Term Ag Forecast

Endowment Farms. Report for Year Ended December 31, 2013

Managing Farm and Farm Household Financial Risk

Gov's Planning Estimates Project Title Rank Fund Project Requests for State Funds

Succession Decisions and Retirement Income of Farm Households. Ashok Mishra Hisham El-Osta James Johnson

Revenue and Costs for Illinois Grain Crops, Actual for 2012 through 2017, Projected 2018 and 2019

Revenue and Costs for Corn, Soybeans, Wheat, and Double-Crop Soybeans, Actual for 2011 through 2016, Projected 2017 and 2018

Nurturing Agricultural Businesses ESLC Conference, November 2014 Stephen McHenry, Executive Director

Relative Importance of Price vs. Yield variability in Crop Revenue Risk

University of Illinois

2017 Farm Bank Performance Report

A Checkup On Your Financial Health. Paul Ellinger Bruce Sherrick

AGRICULTURAL Finance Monitor

Olericulture Hort 320 Lesson 10, Enterprise Budgets

FRUIT FARM BUSINESS SUMMARY LAKE ONTARIO REGION NEW YORK October 2007 E.B Gerald B. White Alison M. DeMarree James Neyhard

AgriBank, FCB and Affiliated Associations

This school will be limited to 60 students. Visit

Call Report Preparation: Advanced Lending Schedules and Issues: OREO, Participations, TDRs, Commitments, Insiders

esults of Agricultural and Horticultural Use-Value Taxation Program Survey

Land values and interest rates: will Iowa farms sink or swim?

ILO, Marquet. PAPER No. 47 BUNDLING TO MAKE AGRICULTURE INSURANCE WORK

Impact of Crop Insurance on Land Values. Michael Duffy

2018 National Survey of Community Banks

What s Ahead for Farmland Trends? How do Young Farmers Fit In?

Interest Rates on Farm Loans

An Introduction to FSA Farm Loans

Food Security Policy Project Research Highlights Myanmar

Dairy Business Analysis Project: 2005 Summary for Florida and Georgia Dairies

The Differences In Profitability Among Higher Debt AgFA Dairy Farms 2003

Financial Management Practices of New York Dairy Farms

The Agricultural Corporation Exemption Regulations

Standing Rock Indian Reservation Agricultural Statistics 2002 Census of Agriculture

AEC 851 BUDGETING ACTIVITY ANALYSIS INTRODUCTION TO BUDGETING AND

Rosebud Indian Reservation Agricultural Statistics 2002 Census of Agriculture

Evaluating the New Century Go-Go Farmer

Farm funding models and business structures in Australia

A SUMMARY OF ECONOMIC CONDITIONS IN SEMINOLE, WEWOKA AND SEMINOLE COUNTY, OKLAHOMA 2011

Southern Punjab Poverty Alleviation Project (SPPAP)

Midwest Perspectives. Bill Testa Vice President Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago

A SUMMARY OF ECONOMIC CONDITIONS IN HENRYETTA AND OKMULGEE COUNTY, OKLAHOMA 2009

AGRICULTURAL Finance Monitor

Marvin J. Hoekema Manager, Dairy Business Analysis Project Department of Dairy and Poultry Sciences University of Florida

Six Year Trend Analysis New York State Dairy Farms Selected Financial and Production Factors

Statement for the Record. American Bankers Association. Agriculture Committee. United States House of Representatives

Introduction January 10, 2019

Farm Loans to Finance

Mail: Section 5 Division P.O. Box Boston, MA (Phone) (Fax)

Agribusiness Lending Internal Control Questionnaire

Linking Programs IN THE BEGINNING

Transcription:

The Agricultural Credit Market Producer Preferences for Lender Attributes Summary of Survey Results Paul N. Ellinger 4545 Travis A. Farley The Center for Farm and Rural Business Finance University of Illinois 326 Mumford Hall 1301 W. Gregory Drive Urbana, IL 61801 The University of Illinois provides equal opportunities in programs and employment.

THE AGRICULTURAL CREDIT MARKET: PRODUCER PREFERENCES FOR LENDER ATTRIBUTES SURVEY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Evolutionary changes in the agricultural and financial sectors continue to impact the delivery of financial services to customers. As credit suppliers to a highly capital intensive industry, agricultural lenders must adapt to these changes and identify the opportunities that exist in this rapidly changing environment. The ongoing mergers and acquisitions of institutions lending to agriculture changes the competitive landscape and services to borrowers. Successful institutions may need to become more customer-driven by identifying segments and niches that result in increased customer and lender value. Advances in technology and the overall competitiveness in agricultural credit markets have motivated lenders to develop cost-effective strategies for delivering services to various customer segments. Some customer segments are likely to be interest rate sensitive while other segments place considerable value on lender relationships. Identifying and responding to customer expectations and offering the proper product mix are critical to success. The attributes farmers value in agricultural lenders are investigated in this survey. In a future report the results will be analyzed across borrower characteristics such as farm size, age, and leverage. The survey was mailed to 3,000 producers across Illinois, Indiana, and Iowa in August 2004. Receiving 538 usable questionnaires yields a response rate of approximately 18%. Demographic and Business Information A significant proportion of respondents are 46 years of age or older (78%). The majority of respondents intend to expand their farm operation (47%) or remain the same size (42%). Approximately 55% of respondents farm between 500 and 1,500 acres with 20% farming between 1,501 and 2,500 acres. Average total farm sales per year varies among respondents. Approximately 50% earn between $100,000 to $500,000 in farm sales per year. The largest percentage of farmers operate at a debt-to-asset ratio between.11 and.40 (42%). 1

Financing Characteristics The majority of responding producers prefer to meet with their lender at the lending institution (56%). Approximately 53% of farmers desire on-farm lender visits at least once per year, while 34% report such visits are not needed. Over the past three years, approximately 73% of survey participants sourced operating credit from banks while 33% sought financing from Farm Credit Services. Traditional vs. Nontraditional Lenders Fifty-five percent of respondents source financing from nontraditional lenders. The strongest reasons for using nontraditional credit suppliers are interest rate and dealer financing incentives. The strongest reasons for using traditional lenders over nontraditional lenders are lender relationship and the desire to remain with the same institution for credit needs. Borrower Loyalty When asked to rate the importance of selected reasons for changing primary lending institutions, interest rate differences of 1%, 1.5%, and 2% represent the strongest influences to switch lenders. The lender s inability to meet borrower needs follows in importance. Less influential motives for seeking a different lender include the lack of on-line banking services, lender has limited office hours, and limited community involvement by the institution. Importance of Selected Lender Attributes Participants rated the importance of selected lender characteristics. Based on average rating, interest rate, stability of the institution, and dependable credit source rank as the three highest rated attributes. The least important attributes are crop insurance, Internet services, and customer appreciation events. 2

Summary and Overview of Survey Questions Demographic and Business Information The majority of respondents are 46 years of age or older (78%). Age Number Percentage 35 and younger 19 3.5% 36 45 97 18.1% 46 55 186 34.7% 56 65 130 24.3% Over 65 104 19.4% Total 536 100.0% Education level of respondents: Education Level Number Percentage Less than high school 3 0.6% High school 178 33.1% Some college 120 22.3% 2-year degree 66 12.3% 4-year degree 142 26.4% Graduate degree 28 5.2% Total 537 100.0% The major enterprise for 96% of respondents is field crops. Forty-six percent of participants consider field crops their only business enterprise. Major Enterprise Number Percentage Minor Enterprises Number Percentage 1 Field crops 515 95.9% Swine 83 16.4% Livestock 22 4.1% Cattle 138 27.2% Specialty crops 0 0% Poultry 5 1.0% Other 0 0% Dairy 10 2.0% Other 136 26.8% None 231 45.6% Total 537 100.0% Total 507 1 Does not equal 100.0% because respondents were asked to select all minor enterprises that apply. 3

The distribution of respondents by farm business structure: Business Structure Number Percentage Sole Proprietor 335 62.7% Partnership 96 18.0% Corporation 103 19.3% Total 534 100.0% Future business plans: Business Direction Number Percentage Expand 250 47.1% Downsize 31 5.8% Remain the same 222 41.8% Sell out 28 5.3% Total 531 100.0% Nearly half of responding farmers intend to expand their operation. Farm size in acres for respondents: Farm size (tillable acres) Number Percentage Less than 500 91 17.0% 500 1,500 292 54.6% 1,501 2,500 106 19.8% 2,501 5,000 37 6.9% More than 5,000 9 1.7% Total 535 100.0% Over half of participants farm between 500 and 1,500 acres. Tenure position of responding producers: % of Farmland Leased Number Percentage 0% - 10% 101 19.0% 11% - 20% 45 8.5% 21% - 50% 115 21.7% 51% - 75% 120 22.6% More than 75% 150 28.2% Total 531 100.0% Approximately 50% of respondents lease half or more of their operated acres. 4

The below graphic shows that producers vary in their reported average total farm sales per year with 516 farmers responding. Average Farm Sales per Year $100,000 - $250,000 20.0% 14.0% Less than $100,000 28.9% 37.2% $250,001 - $500,000 Greater than $500,000 Average off-farm income for responding farmers: Off-Farm Income Number Percentage None 114 21.9% Less than $25,000 193 37.1% $25,000 - $50,000 123 23.7% $50,001 - $75,000 55 10.6% Greater than $75,000 35 6.7% Total 520 100.0% Approximately 60% of respondents earn less than $25,000 in non-farm income. Financial leverage of survey producers: Debt-to-Asset Ratio Number Percentage 0 97 18.8%.01 -.10 124 24.1%.11 -.40 217 42.1%.41 -.70 66 12.8% Greater than.70 11 2.1% Total 515 100.0% 5

Financing Characteristics Characteristics associated with the procurement of financing are addressed in this section of the survey. Thus, respondents who currently do not use debt financing were asked to skip this section of the questionnaire. As a result, 441 (82.0%) of the responding producers were instructed to answer this portion of the survey. Over half of respondents (52.2%) indicate they have been doing business with their primary lender for more than 15 years. Years with Lender Number Percentage Less than 1 8 1.9% 1 5 58 13.5% 6 10 79 18.4% 11 15 60 14.0% More than 15 224 52.2% Total 429 100.0% Survey respondents prefer to meet their lender at the following locations: Location Number Percentage Institution 240 55.7% Farm 35 8.1% Both farm and institution 156 36.2% Total 431 100.0% Fifty-three percent of farmers want their lender to visit their farm operation at least once a year. On-Farm Visit Frequency Number Percentage Once per month 2 0.5% Once every 6 months 52 12.2% Once per year 168 39.4% Once every 2 years 59 13.8% On-farm visits not desired 145 34.0% Total 426 100.0% 6

Within the past three years, approximately 73% of 430 survey participants sourced operating credit from community/commercial banks, while 33% acquired financing from Farm Credit Services. Note that this question asks for credit providers over the past three years. Thus, respondents were allowed to select more than one provider. 100% Sources of Operating Credit over Past 3 Years Responding Farmers 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% 6.3% 73.3% 32.8% 5.8% Individuals Bank Farm Credit No operating credit Approximately 50% of 426 respondents utilized bank institutions to finance real estate purchases over the past five years. Farm Credit Services was used by 32% of farmers for real estate financing. Note that this question asks for credit suppliers over the past five years. Thus, respondents were allowed to select more than one provider. 100% Sources of Real Estate Credit over Past 5 Years Responding Farmers 80% 60% 40% 20% 8.2% 49.5% 32.4% 23.9% 0% Individuals Bank Farm Credit No real estate credit 7

Farmers were asked to describe the impact a bank or Farm Credit merger had on their business. This question was open to all respondents regardless of debt use. Merger Impact Number Percentage Positive, operation benefited from merger 44 8.7% Negative, merger detriment to operation 79 15.7% Merger had no impact on operation 171 34.0% Have not experienced a merger 209 41.6% Total 503 100.0% Traditional vs. Nontraditional Lenders Nontraditional lenders are defined as dealers who offer financing for the purchase of a product, whereas traditional lenders are defined as lenders from a bank or Farm Credit Services. Farmers were asked if they have used nontraditional lenders to finance the purchase of machinery/equipment, seed, and/or chemical/fertilizer over the past three years. Fifty-five percent of 433 respondents report using nontraditional lenders and 45% indicate they used only traditional lenders to support purchases. Farmers who use nontraditional lenders rate the importance of the following reasons for sourcing credit from these providers on a scale of 1 (not important) to 5 (very important): Strength of Importance Reasons 0 1 2 3 4 5 Required paperwork Timeliness in loan decision Dealer relationship Other terms Convenience in obtaining loan Dealer financing incentives Interest rate 3.51 3.57 3.63 3.74 3.91 4.24 4.63 The strongest reason for using nontraditional lenders is interest rate followed by dealer financing incentives while the least important reason is paperwork required to obtain loan. 8

Producers who use traditional lenders rate the importance of the following reasons for using these credit providers on a scale of 1 (not important) to 5 (very important): Strength of Importance Reasons 0 1 2 3 4 5 Dealer's terms unattractive 3.34 Prefer same institution 3.90 Lender relationship 4.09 The strongest reason for using traditional lenders is lender relationship followed by the desire to remain at the same institution for all credit needs. Borrower Loyalty Respondents rated the importance of selected incentives to change primary lending institutions. Ratings are based on a five-point Lickert Scale (1 = not important; 5 = very important). Reasons to Change Lenders Average Importance Rating Rank 2% interest rate difference 4.76 1 1.5% interest rate difference 4.55 2 1% interest rate difference 4.22 3 Current lender cannot meet needs 4.13 4 Lender s fees too high 4.13 5 Fixed interest rates not offered 4.02 6.50% interest rate difference 3.61 7 Institution merged 3.47 8 Institution changed loan officers 3.41 9.25% interest rate difference 3.00 10 Limited community involvement 2.88 11 Lender has limited office hours 2.68 12 No on-line banking 2.47 13 Respondents indicate that an interest rate difference of 1% or greater between current lender and lenders at other institutions is the strongest influence in deciding 9

to switch lenders. Following in importance is a lender s inability to meet borrower needs. Weaker reasons to leave current lender include no on-line banking services, lender has limited office hours, and limited community involvement by the institution. Importance of Selected Lender Attributes Producers rate the importance of selected lender characteristics using at five-point Lickert Scale (1 = not important; 5 = very important): Lender Attribute Average Importance Rating Rank Interest rate 4.47 1 Stability of the institution 4.43 2 Dependable credit source 4.39 3 Ability to meet needs 4.34 4 Lender s knowledge of agriculture 4.25 5 Timeliness in decisions 4.21 6 Lender relationship 4.18 7 Lender s industry experience 4.14 8 Interest in business 4.07 9 Paperwork required 3.77 10 Risk management services 3.55 11 Low staff turnover 3.41 12 Convenient location 3.31 13 Full-service lending 3.22 14 Lender s ability to advise 3.05 15 Community involvement 2.96 16 Financial analysis services 2.84 17 Offers financial counseling 2.62 18 Offers education seminars 2.46 19 On-farm lender visits 2.43 20 Extended office hours 2.37 21 Market advisory services 2.33 22 Customer appreciation events 2.14 23 Provides Internet services 2.12 24 Provides crop insurance 1.74 25 Based on the average rating, interest rate, stability of the institution, and dependable credit source rank the highest in importance. Crop insurance, Internet services, and customer appreciation events rank as least preferred by responding farmers. 10

Respondents ranked the three most important and the three least important lender characteristics when selecting a lender for operating needs and when choosing a lender for real estate acquisitions. Lender Attribute Rankings for Operating Needs Ranking Most Important Attributes Least Important Attributes 1 st Interest rate Customer appreciation events 2 nd Lender s knowledge of agriculture Extended office hours 3 rd Dependable credit source Internet services Lender Attribute Rankings for Real Estate Needs Ranking Most Important Attributes Least Important Attributes 1 st Interest rate Customer appreciation events 2 nd Dependable credit source Extended office hours 3 rd Lender s knowledge of agriculture Internet services 11