Faculty Retirement Survey Executive Summary Faculty Retirement Work Group 1 - April 13, 2016

Similar documents
D E P A R T M E N T O F H U M A N R E S O U R C E S EMERITUS FACULTY RETIREE BENEFITS

RESOLUTION TO AMEND VIRGINIA TECH S VOLUNTARY TRANSITIONAL RETIREMENT PROGRAM FOR TENURED FACULTY (UNIVERSITY POLICY NO. 4410)

Planning Your Transition from Full-time Work

SUMMARY OF KEY BUDGET MODEL ISSUES WITH RECOMMENDATIONS

Working Longer, Working Smarter: Planning and Supporting Faculty Retirements

AAUP Survey of Changes in Faculty Retirement Policies

New Mexico Highlands University Annual Operating Budget Process. approved Fall 2016

American University of Armenia 2016 FRESHMAN STUDENT EXIT SURVEY

OUTDATED. Policy 2-10 Rev 6. Date June 26, Subject: RETIREMENT I. PURPOSE. To outline the university's policy toward retirement of personnel.

American University of Armenia 2018 Freshman Student Exit Survey. Prepared by Office of Institutional Research and Assessment

GENERAL CAMPUS COMPENSATION PLAN TRIAL (GCCP) FAQ Last updated 03/16/18

2018 Curricular & Co-Curricular Assessment Needs Survey & Interview Report

UH-Clear Lake Budget

Budget Reform Update. Paul Ellinger, Associate Chancellor & Vice Provost Budget and Resource Planning

UW-STOUT Annual Operating Budget Process

The Florida International University Budget Town Hall Discussion. March 9, 2009

Kutztown University Policy ACA-047. Grade Appeal

WILLIAM MARSH RICE UNIVERSITY FACULTY PHASED RETIREMENT PLAN FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

For Yale Faculty, Staff, and Students only

Washington State University General Guidelines for Establishing and Allocating Services and Activities Fees

2009 Spring Check-In Survey Report

Voluntary Phased Retirement Plan for Full-Time Faculty

INFORMATION FOR UNIVERSITY RETIREES AND PHASED/PROSPECTIVE RETIREES

Pace University 2013 Retirement Option

Carry Forward of Year End Funds

BERKELEY EXCELLENCE ACCOUNTS FOR RESEARCH (BEAR) INFORMATION FOR FACULTY AND ADMINISTRATORS September 2014

University of Houston-Clear Lake Appendix A - Allocation of New FY 2014 Resources

Using Discretionary Funds

AY2018 Senior Survey: College of Business Administration Report Introduction

Jamie Fernandes, Associate Controller Budget Overview

Joseph Trubacz Senior Vice President for Finance and Administration

Operating Budget FY 2009 Budget (in $M)

Mid-career through retirement faculty development. NEW FRONTIERS for Faculty Development

Functions at West Virginia University

Office of the Academic Senate One Washington Square San Jose, California Fax:

A Absences... 5, 45, 46, 48, 49, 54, 55, 56 Academic Calendar ACADEMIC FACULTY ACADEMIC FREEDOM, Article Academic Rank for Provosts

Summary of Revisions. The scope of and permissible timeframe for academic IFR programs have been expanded.

Financial Operating. & Capital Plan Reviews FY Budget Forum. February 14, FY 2014 Budget Forum - February

Budget Model Refinement Discussion. October 2018

Washington State University General Guidelines for Establishing and Allocating Services and Activities Fees

2014 Student Experience at the Research University (SERU) Item Frequencies and Means - Ethnicity by College - Asian Amer. N % Hispanic Amer.

UNIVERSITY OF SCRANTON FACULTY CONTRACT

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Statement of Net Positon 1. Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Net Position 2. Total Expenditures by Fund 3

McGill University Budget: FY2010 (and beyond) Prof. Anthony C. Masi

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Statement of Net Positon 1. Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Net Position 2. Total Expenditures by Fund 3

Washington State University General Guidelines for Establishing and Allocating Services and Activities Fees

Phased Retirement Policy

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Statement of Net Positon 1. Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Net Position 2. Total Expenditures by Fund 3

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Statement of Net Positon 1. Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Net Position 2. Total Expenditures by Fund 3

Austin Community College. Internal Customer Satisfaction Survey. Spring 2003 Analysis of College-wide Services

The Stanford University Budget Plan

Using Discretionary Funds

IDAHO STATE UNIVERSITY POLICIES AND PROCEDURES (ISUPP) Compensation in Excess of Base Salary Policy #7020

Budget Flint Campus

B-CU Graduate Exit Survey Spring Spring 2015 Report

STUDENT EXPERIENCE SURVEY - HE 2016

RCM Review. Responsibility Centered Management Review September Budget Planning & Resource Analysis

2/22/2019. Understanding the University Budget Kelley Westhoff Executive Director for Budget, Planning, & Analysis. Agenda

Biennium Open Budget Forum April 2009

Financial Report 2000

OAA Forum III: FY16 OAA Budget. May 27, 2015

Informational Session for Fiscal Year Budget

In fiscal year (FY) , the general fund base budgets by department were as follows:

DEANS, VICE CHANCELLORS, UNIVERSITY LIBRARIAN, ATHLETIC DIRECTOR AND CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER

Contract Review Policy Purchasing Goods and Services

Food Services Advisory Committee. UH Planning and Budgeting

Post-Retirement Service Program Notice of Intent to Participate

USC Faculty Benefits Comparison Chart FEEC 2016

Annual Budget Report. Charlie Faas VP Administration & Finance/CFO

UNIVERSITY OF SCRANTON FACULTY CONTRACT. Effective September 1, 2009 through August 31, 2012

This budget is the first to incorporate our university community s shared goals as expressed in our new strategic plan, Building on Excellence.

Wednesday, November 8, 2006

Budget Restructuring, Base Budgets and the Academic Plan

Compensation Plan. McGovern Medical School. The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston

WESTMONT COLLEGE CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

Operating Budget for Fiscal Year (FY) For Consideration by the Board of Trustees March 27, 2015

UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING BUDGETS

Gov s Proposed Budget

I. Background. Budget Advisory Council

DRAFT August 2, Overview of OSU New Education and General (or Shared Responsibility) Budget Model Academic Colleges Focus

WRIGHT STATE UNIVERSITY

COLLEGE OF DUPAGE FY2015 Budget Summary

UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA AT KEARNEY BUDGET OVERVIEW

Presentation to the UH Faculty Senate. University of Houston FY 2016 Budget For current information see

FY 2016 BUDGET RUTGERS NEWARK

Texas Christian University Handbook for Retirees Contents

Fourth Report of the Budget Model Development Committee

University of Houston Student Leadership Forum Budget and Legislative Processes

Cumulative Count and Percent CampusClimate

SOUTHWEST TENNESSEE COMMUNITY COLLEGE

Saddleback College Strategic Planning Process. Recommended by the Consultation Council, 6/16/09 Approved by the President, 6/23/09 Revised, 8/6/09

Sequoias Community College District RESOURCE

3260 HOSPITALITY AND PUBLIC RELATIONS

Highlights financial report. June 30 June (in thousands)

Executive Summary University of New Mexico Consolidated Financial Report FY 2013, 4 months ending 10/31/2012

University of Houston System

11 May Report.xls Office of Budget & Fiscal Planning

General Campus Compensation Plan Trial UC San Diego Implementation Guidelines

An Overview of University at Buffalo Governance, Funding Sources and Financial Reporting

EASTERN WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY BUDGET PRIMER

Transcription:

Faculty Retirement Survey Faculty Retirement Survey Executive Summary Faculty Retirement Work Group 1 - April 13, 2016 A faculty retirement survey (Appendix A) was administered to 495 tenured or tenure track faculty members at Marquette University through learning bridge, a third-party vendor, from January 25 through February 5, 2016. Overall, 55% of those who received the survey responded, including 43% of eligible assistant professors, 55% of eligible associate professors, and 62% of eligible professors. Retirement Planning To get a better sense of how faculty think about retirement planning and to better and more proactively address their needs, faculty were asked to identify the level of importance of five planning items (on a scale from 1 (not at all important) to 7 (extremely important). Across all respondents, mean scores for four of the five items hovered around 5, while one, legacy project was rated below 4. It is likely many individuals did not know the meaning of a legacy project 2 leading to the lower mean score. Faculty between the ages of 60-69 were particularly interested in both financial planning seminars and counseling sessions while faculty 20-39 years old were most interested in financial planning tools and the assurance of including a partner in retirement planning. 1 The Faculty Retirement Work Group included the following Marquette University faculty and staff: Laura Bautista (Associate General Counsel), Cas Castro (Vice President of Human Resources), Sally Doyle (Assistant Provost for Budget & Division Operations), Judith McMullen (Law School Professor), Gary Meyer, Chair (Senior Vice Provost for Faculty Affairs), Anne Pasero (Klingler College of Arts & Sciences Professor and University Academic Senate Representative), James South (Klingler College of Arts & Sciences Associate Dean for Faculty). 2 A legacy project is a special project that a faculty member would complete before retirement. Examples include finishing a book or other manuscript, implementing a campus-wide policy change, creating a center or institute, writing a grant, and teaching a special course. 1

Phased Retirement The survey queried faculty about eight things that would be most important to them (on a scale from 1 (not at all important) to 7 (extremely important) if they were to consider a phased retirement option. Mean scores across all respondents revealed four aspects of phased retirement were clearly most important, all with scores above six, including (1) health benefits, (2) the ability to negotiate the type and amount of work, (3) retaining tenure, and (4) receiving a buy-out after the phased timeframe. Scores for the ability to complete work in a single semester, participate in departmental activities, and participate in transition counseling all were around five and the ability to participate in shared governance was rated lowest at about four and a half. Retaining health benefits was most important to those faculty 50-59 years old as well as those 60-69 years old whereas the ability to negotiate the type and amount of work was most important to those faculty between the ages of 70-79. 2

Post Retirement Benefits and Opportunities Faculty were also asked to consider what they perceived to be most important to them after retiring from Marquette University. In all, 19 benefits and opportunities were presented and rated on a scale from 1 (not at all important) to 7 (extremely important). Overall, respondents identified (1) accessing library materials, (2) retaining an e-mail account, and (3) establishing emeritus status before retiring as the three things most important to them. The ability to continue researching, parking on campus, and obtaining office space were identified as the next three most important benefits or opportunities. Obtaining tuition remission for oneself, partner, and dependents was especially important to respondents between the ages of 40-49 years of age (mean 5.48) and respondents between the ages of 20-39 (mean 5.13) versus an overall mean of 4.68. 3

Retirement Concerns Finally, faculty were queried about concerns they have as they think about retirement. Faculty rated six potential concerns on a scale 1 (not at all concerned) to 7 (extremely concerned). The top three concerns were (1) securing adequate health insurance for self, partner, and dependents, (2) having sufficient financial resources, and (3) continuing to engage in intellectually stimulating work. Faculty between the ages of 70-79, were more concerned with the ability to continue engaging in stimulating work (mean 6.42) vis a vis ensuring adequate health insurance (5.74) or the adequacy of financial resources (5.21). 4

Utilizing Survey Results Most immediately, survey results aided the Faculty Retirement Work Group in their consideration of various options related to revisions of the Tenure Buyout Policy. For example, both phased options proposed by this group include the top three aspects identified as most important: (1) a stipend for health benefits, (2) the ability to negotiate the amount and type of work, and (3) retaining tenure during the phased term, either one or two years. Further, one of the two options includes a buyout after the phased term, which was identified as the next most important characteristic to faculty. Faculty identified accessing library materials, maintaining an e-mail account, and establishing emeritus status before retiring as the three most important benefits or opportunities after retiring. Faculty currently retain access to library materials after retiring, however do not maintain an e-mail account unless granted emeritus status. As a result of this survey, the Office of the Provost along with the Department of Human Resources is reviewing the current policy on e-mail accounts to determine if changes are warranted. Emeritus status is determined in accordance with Section 301.03 of the Faculty Handbook and through a process whereby a dossier is prepared that moves through the traditional promotion and tenure process with evaluations at the department, college, and dean levels before moving on to the University Committee on Faculty Promotions and Tenure, the provost and finally the president. Again as a result of this survey, the University Committee on Faculty Promotions and Tenure is reviewing the current policy and procedure for granting emeritus status to determine if changes are warranted. Finally, the Human Resources division on campus is reviewing its current retirement offerings to determine their sufficiency and at the same time considering which financial planning tools might be incorporated online (or via other means) to best assist faculty as they plan for eventual retirement. 5

APPENDIX A Faculty Retirement Survey 6

Section A: Retirement Planning Extremely Not at all How important is each of the following to you as you think about retirement planning? Important Neutral Important 1. Retirement transition counseling 2. Executing a culminating (legacy) project 3. Financial planning seminars / workshops 4. Financial planning tools (e.g., checklist, calculator, etc.) 5. Ability to have partner included in retirement planning 6. Other (specify) Please feel free to elaborate on any of the above items or share other thoughts about retirement planning here (open-ended item): Section B: Phased Retirement Phased retirement typically consists of reduced work and reduced pay for a designated period of time (e.g., half-time load with half salary for three years). How important do you think each of the following would be to you Extremely Not at all if you were to consider phased retirement? Important Neutral Important 1. Ability to negotiate the type and amount of work 2. Ability to complete work in a single semester 3. Health benefits or an equivalent amount to buy into plan 4. Receiving some type of buy-out after the phased timeframe 5. Retaining tenure throughout the phased timeframe 6. Ability to fully participate in departmental activities 7. Ability to fully participate in university shared governance 8. Participating in retirement transition counseling 9. Other (specify) 7

Please feel free to elaborate on any of the above items or share other thoughts about phased retirement planning here (open-ended item): Section C: Post Retirement Benefits and Opportunities How important do you believe each of the following benefits or opportunities Extremely Not at all will be to you after you retire? Important Neutral Important 1. Establishing emeritus status (before retiring) 2. Serving on university committees 3. Obtaining ongoing financial services advice 4. Mentoring new/junior faculty 5. Parking on campus 6. Obtaining tuition remission for self, partner, dependents 7. Retaining an e-mail account 8. Accessing library materials 9. Receiving discounts at MU stores (e.g., Spirit Shop) 10. Obtaining office space 11. Receiving discounts at MU clinics 12. Obtaining lab space 13. Conducting research 14. Teaching a course 15. Advising students 16. Attending wellness, recreational, social, fitness activities 17. Attending spiritual activities (e.g., retreats, formation programs) 18. Obtaining discounted basketball tickets 19. Socializing at a faculty club 20. Other (specify) 8

Please feel free to elaborate on any of the above items or share other thoughts about post retirement here (open-ended item): Section D: Retirement Concerns Extremely Not at all How concerned are you about each of the following as you think about retirement? Concerned Neutral Concerned 1. Having sufficient financial resources 2. Maintaining friendships with Marquette University colleagues 3. Continuing to engage in intellectually stimulating work 4. Ensuring you made a difference while at Marquette University 5. Securing adequate health insurance for self, partner, dependents 6. Maintaining a connection to Marquette University 7. Other Please feel free to elaborate on any of the above items or share other thoughts about retirement concerns here (open-ended item): Section E: Demographics 1. Academic rank: Assistant Professor Associate Professor Professor 2. Tenure status: On tenure track Tenured 3. Years at Marquette University (as a faculty member or administrator): Less than 5 years 16-20 years 31-35 years 6-10 years 21-25 years 36-40 years 11-15 years 26-30 years Over 40 years 4. Years at another institution (as a faculty member or administrator): I have never worked at another institution 16-20 years 36-40 years Less than 5 years 21-25 years Over 40 years 6-10 years 26-30 years 11-15 years 31-35 years 9

5. Age: 20-29 years old 40-49 years old 60-69 years old Over 79 years old 30-39 years old 50-59 years old 70-79 years old 6. Gender: 10