Ciner Resources LP Investor Presentation August 2017

Similar documents
A LEADING PRODUCER OF NATURAL SODA ASH

NATURAL RESOURCE PARTNERS L.P MLP AND ENERGY INFRASTRUCTURE CONFERENCE FIRESIDE CHAT

SunCoke Energy Partners, L.P. Q Earnings & 2015 Guidance Conference Call. January 29, 2015

September 2018 MINERALS TECHNOLOGIES INC. MTI OVERVIEW INNOVATION LEADERSHIP EXCELLENCE

SunCoke Energy Partners, L.P. Q Earnings Conference Call. January 28, 2016

NAPTP 2013 MLP Investor Conference. May 23, 2013

September 2018 MINERALS TECHNOLOGIES INC. MTI OVERVIEW INNOVATION LEADERSHIP EXCELLENCE

NAPTP 2014 MLP Investor Conference. May 22, 2014

Investor Presentation. Third Quarter 2015

Investor Meetings. November 2014

Simplification and Financial Repositioning February 8, 2018

NAPTP MLP Conference. Carlin Conner, CEO Bob Fitzgerald, CFO. May 22, 2014

INVESTOR PRESENTATION MAY 2016

Full year 2018 performance driven by continued strength in the Gulf of Mexico, capturing organic growth opportunities.

PBF Logistics LP (NYSE: PBFX)

SHELL MIDSTREAM PARTNERS, L.P. (SHLX) Q RESULTS ANNOUNCEMENT

UBS MLP One-on-One Conference. January 2014

PBF Logistics LP (NYSE: PBFX)

Intrepid Reports Results for Second Quarter 2008

Shell Midstream Partners, L.P. (SHLX) Q Results

Dahlman Rose & Co. Global Metals, Mining & Materials Conference. November 17, 2011

Morgan Stanley Midstream MLP and Diversified Natural Gas Corporate Access Event. March 2014

SunCoke Energy Partners, L.P. Q Earnings Conference Call. April 26, 2018

SHELL MIDSTREAM PARTNERS, L.P.

Investor Relations Presentation

NEWS RELEASE. Westmoreland Reports 2014 Year End Results - Record Revenue and Adjusted EBITDA

PBF Energy Inc. (NYSE: PBF) January 2017 Investor Presentation

Smart Sand, Inc. Announces Third Quarter 2017 Results

Investor Relations Presentation

Shell Midstream Partners, L.P. (SHLX) Q Results

Citigroup 14 th Annual High Yield / Leveraged Finance Conference

ABOUT SHELL MIDSTREAM PARTNERS, L.P.

Shell Midstream Partners, L.P. (SHLX) Q Results

Genesis Energy, L.P. Reports First Quarter 2018 Results

INVESTOR PRESENTATION NOVEMBER 2015

2018 Second Quarter Results Conference Call August 8, Welcome to the 2018 Second Quarter Conference Call for Genesis Energy.

FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS ASSET HIGHLIGHTS. Significant Offshore Pipeline Transportation:

Longbow Research Minneapolis, MN October 12, 2005 W. Kim Foster Senior Vice President and CFO

February 2019 MINERALS TECHNOLOGIES INC. MTI OVERVIEW INNOVATION LEADERSHIP EXCELLENCE

Carbon Solutions Acquisition and Refined Coal Update

Sprague Resources LP. MLP and Energy Infrastructure May 23, 2018

Safe Harbor WESTMORELAND COAL COMPANY

Sprague Resources LP Reports First Quarter 2018 Results. Partnership confirms 2018 Adjusted EBITDA Guidance of $120 to $140 Million

CC Media Holdings, Inc. Reports Second Quarter 2009 Results

PTXP Update: Operations and Events

Momentive Performance Materials Inc. 22 Corporate Woods Blvd. Albany, NY 12211

Copano Energy. Memphis, TN

SHELL MIDSTREAM PARTNERS, L.P. (SHLX) Q RESULTS ANNOUNCEMENT

Tata Chemicals (Soda Ash) Partners Holdings and Subsidiaries

Non-GAAP Reconciliations Third Quarter 2016 Published November 9, 2016

Q Earnings. Supplemental Financials. September 25, 2018

Westmoreland Reports Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2017 Results; Capital Structure Optimization Underway

Fiscal Year nd Quarter Earnings Conference Call Presentation April 27, 2011

Investor Presentation August 2015

Wells Fargo Pipeline, MLP and Utility Symposium

Intrepid Reports Results for Third Quarter 2008

CINER RESOURCES LP (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Tesoro Logistics LP NYSE: TLLP Citi MLP/Midstream Infrastructure Conference August 2012

EQM & EQGP Investor Presentation

Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P. Proposed Investment in Asciano Limited Conference Call Presentation August 2015

1Q 2018 Highlights and Operating Results

Cowen and Company 5 th Annual Ultimate Energy Conference

November 8, Third Quarter 2018 Results Earnings Conference Call

EQM & EQGP Investor Presentation

Dynagas LNG Partners ( DLNG ) 2nd Quarter and Six Months ended June 30, July 2016

Enable Midstream Partners, LP

Investor Presentation. May 2010

Buckeye GP Holdings L.P. (NYSE: BGH) Buckeye Partners, L.P. (NYSE: BPL) Kelso & Company Annual LP Conference April 21, 2010

EQM & EQGP Investor Presentation

SunCoke Energy Partners, L.P. Announces Strongest Ever Quarterly Operating Performance With Third Quarter 2017 Results

May 24, 2018 MLP & Energy Conference

2013 Citi One-on-One MLP / Midstream Infrastructure Conference. August 21-22, 2013

Investor Relations Presentation

4Q 2018 Highlights and Operating Results. Products. Technology. Services. Delivered Globally.

Smart Sand, Inc. Announces First Quarter 2018 Results

May 24, 2018 MLP & Energy Conference

Sanford C. Bernstein Industrials and Basic Materials Summit. May 8, 2015

Antero Midstream Announces Acquisition of Water Business, Private Placement of Common Units & Increased Guidance

INVESTOR PRESENTATION MAY 2018

2Q 2017 Highlights and Operating Results

UBS MLP One-on-One Conference

SunCoke Energy, Inc. Q Earnings Conference Call January 30, 2014

EQT REPORTS SECOND QUARTER 2016 EARNINGS Increases 2016 drilling plan

FORM 8-K. CC Media Holdings Inc - CCMO. Filed: August 11, 2009 (period: August 10, 2009) Report of unscheduled material events or corporate changes.

SunCoke Energy, Inc. Q Earnings Conference Call. October 20, 2016

August 9, Second Quarter 2018 Results Earnings Conference Call

Q and FY 2015 Investor Presentation

SunCoke Energy, Inc. Post-Dropdown Business Update Call

UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION REPORTS THIRD QUARTER 2018 RESULTS

NEWS RELEASE. Westmoreland Enters MLP Space. Agrees to Acquire the General Partner of Oxford Resource Partners

MARTIN MIDSTREAM PARTNERS L.P. Deutsche Bank Leveraged Finance Conference September 29, 2015

BP Midstream Partners LP 3Q 2018 Results

INVESTOR PRESENTATION DECEMBER 2018

BB&T Capital Markets Commercial & Industrial Investor Conference. March 2015

INVESTOR PRESENTATION JANUARY 2018

May 9, First Quarter 2018 Results Earnings Conference Call

Fourth Quarter 2017 Earnings Presentation. February 14, 2018

EQT Announces Plan to Separate Midstream Business. February 21, 2018

Non-GAAP Reconciliations Second Quarter 2017 Published August 2, 2017

Polyolefin Catalysts Acquisition

Transcription:

Ciner Resources LP Investor Presentation August 2017

Safe Harbor Statement This presentation may contain forward-looking statements. All statements that address operating performance, events or developments that we expect or anticipate will occur in the future are forward-looking statements. Caution should be taken not to place undue reliance on any such forward-looking statements because actual results may differ materially from the results suggested by these statements. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. In addition, forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from our historical experience and present expectations or projections. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, those described in the Risk Factors section of CINR s 10-K dated March 6, 2017, and those described from time-to-time in our periodic and other reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. 2

Ciner Resources LP - At A Glance Fixed-distribution Master Limited Partnership IPO in September 2013 One of the largest and lowest cost producers of natural soda ash in the world Soda ash, an essential raw material used in the production of glass, chemicals and detergents, is a well structured global industry with steadily growing demand of ~3% annually, or ~ 1.8M tons per year Over 2.65 million short tons annual soda ash production ~475 employees 66+ years of mining reserves 2016 Revenue: $475.2 million 2016 Adjusted EBITDA: $116.5 million 3

Ciner Resources - Competitive Advantages Most efficient soda ash producer in North America Amongst lowest cost producers in the world Uniquely configured asset footprint Strong safety and environmental records Excellent workforce relationship; non-union Stable end markets and customer relationships Experienced management and operational team 4

Delivering Value to Unitholders 40% total unit holder return in 2016 Long-term stable cash flows support MLP model 66+ year reserve life, significant cost inputs hedged, long-term customers Organic growth projects identified that would allow production volume growth at 1%-4% per year through 2019 Strong financial position at approximately 1X leverage ratio 1.07X trailing 12 month distribution coverage ratio Compelling investment proposition through yield plus potential distribution growth ~8.5% current yield Quarterly Distribution Per Unit Quarterly Coverage Ratio 6

Growing Global Demand Diverse End-Market Uses (Global Soda Ash Consumption by End Market, By volume, 2016) Alumina & Others Metals/Mining 16% 6% Chemicals 9% Other Glass 5% Significant Consumption Growth Expected (Global Soda Ash Consumption, millions of tons) 57.9 58.7 58.9 60.2 61.0 61.9 2016 2026 CAGR: 2.1% 74.4 STPP & Soaps/Deterge nts 15% Container Glass 21% Hou 22% Pulp & Paper 1% Major Producer of Low-Cost Natural Soda Ash (2016 Soda Ash Production Capacity) Other Sythetic 8% Other Global Natural 2% US Natural 20% Demand = 62 million short tons Tata 20% Flat Glass 27% Searles 10% Solvay 23% Ciner 19% Tronox 28% 2011A 2012A 2013A 2014A 2015A 2016E 2026E Ample Room for per Capita Consumption to Grow (2016, kg / person) Region Consumption per Capita (kg / person) U.S.A. 16 Middle East 7 Latin America 5 Asia Ex-China 3 Solvay 48% Source: IHS and USGS Soda Ash. Global Production Capacity = 72 million short tons US Production Capacity = 14 million short tons Africa 1 7

Amongst the Lowest Cost Producers in the World Trona Based Production is Significantly Cost Advantaged As a producer of natural soda ash from trona, Ciner Resources has a significant cost advantage compared to synthetic producers around the world Trona-based production consumes less energy and produces fewer undesirable by-products than synthetic production Synthetic producers incur additional costs associated with the storage, disposal, or attempted resale of byproducts Even accounting for higher freight and logistics costs, Ciner Resources is cost competitive with synthetic soda ash producers to most export markets around the world Ciner Resources consistently operates at high utilization rates and routinely sells 100% of its production Lowest-Cost Production Process Process Raw Materials Energy Usage By- Products Relative Soda Ash Production Costs U.S. Trona Solvay Hou Mining and refining trona Trona 4 6 MMBtu / ton Deca (able to process into soda ash) 1/2~3/4 cost of competing processes 1 1.0x U.S. Trona (Natural Gas) Synthetic production Salt (brine), Limestone, Ammonia 10 14 MMBtu / ton Calcium Chloride (waste product) 1.4x European Solvay 1.3x China Solvay Synthetic production Salt (brine), Ammonia, Carbon Dioxide 10 14 MMBtu / ton Ammonium Chloride (co-product) 2.0x China Hou Source: IHS and Ciner estimates 8

Most Efficient Soda Ash Producer in Green River Basin Ciner has the highest soda ash production per employee and the best energy efficiency in the Green River Basin. Production Per Employee (x10 ST, 2016) Green River s Most Energy Efficient Producer (MMBtu/ton, 2016) 640 Peer 1 568 Peer 2 482 Peer 3 414 Source: State of Wyoming Mining Report, Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality. Annual Report State Inspector of Mines of Wyoming. Bessemer Wyoming estimates. 8

Trona Beds Closest to the Surface Beds 24 & 25 (closest to surface) are the key for lower manufacturing costs as lower halite impurities and shallow beds are conducive to efficient mining Schematic Section Green River Basin 10

Unique Pond Network Lowers Ore to Ash Ratio Wider pond surface area and a unique pond network facilitate the minimization of soda ash lost in processing Trona Advantageous Facility Layout Ponds enable Ciner to recover soda ash via deca rehydration otherwise lost in processing Trona Technological innovation enables Ciner to be more cost efficient Ore to Ash Ratio (1) 1.80 1.74 1.61 1.60 1.56 1.59 1.52 1.52 1.50 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 (1) Amount of short tons of Trona ore required to produce one short ton of soda ash/liquor 11

Ability to Execute on Growth Opportunities Ciner has the balance sheet flexibility to capitalize on organic expansion & acquisition opportunities to drive growth Balance Sheet Flexibility to Support Growth New $235M revolver with ~ $100 million in current available revolver capacity closed August 1st Ciner Resources Leverage and Liquidity Conservative leverage profile with ~ 1.0x Net Debt / EBITDA Well-capitalized sponsor to support growth with deep operational and industry expertise Capitalize on Organic Expansion Opportunities Emerging Market Growth Debottlenecking, deca and efficiency enhancements driving approximately 1-4% annual production volume growth Pursue Accretive Acquisitions Natural Resources / Industrial Minerals Logistics Assets Assets currently existing or to be developed at Ciner Enterprises Note: Adjusted EBITDA is a non-gaap measure. For a description of Adjusted EBITDA and a reconciliation to the most comparable measures calculated in accordance to GAAP, see the Appendix to this presentation. 12

Stable Operating and Financial Results Soda Ash Volume Sold (millions of ST) 2.5 2.55 2.66 2.74 1.30 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Ciner Resources EBITDA ($ in millions) 104.4 120.5 133.9 116.5 56.0 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 13

Market Trends China prices still strong China export prices expected to be up slightly in Q3. Government environmental inspections ongoing, which are expected to result in temporary shutdowns, leading to a reduction in soda ash supply China exports YTD through May at lowest level since 2004 Other international markets South America and Middle East pricing under pressure Expansion in Turkey pushed European synthetic producers to offer tons into other markets at lower prices Domestic prices flat so far in 2017 Ciner Turkey expansion caused a drop in prices as global market adjusts to new capacity coming online Confidential 13

Ciner Resources - Investment Highlights Compelling investment proposition provided through yield plus distribution growth Stable cash generation Organic and acquisition growth opportunities supporting annual distribution growth Conservative coverage ratio Lowest cost soda ash production Significant mining reserve life Operational advantages Strong safety record and environmental responsibility Stable customer relationships Proven management and operational team 15

APPENDIX Confidential 16

Refining Process Flow Mining Process Flow Process Overview Continuous Mining Haulage Crushing Surge Storage Hoisting Ciner s Unique Process Screening & Crushing Calcining Dissolving Filtering Deca Rehydration Shipping Storage Drying Evaporation 17

Ciner Organizational Structure Ciner Enterprises (100.0% Ownership) Ciner Resources Corporation (100.0% Ownership) Public ~25% LP Interest Ciner Wyoming Holding Co. 73% LP Interest 14.551 million common units Natural Resource Partners L.P. (100% Ownership) 5.10 million common units Ciner Resource Partners LLC 2% GP Interest & IDRs 0.399 million units NRP Trona LLC (49% Member Interest) Ciner Resources LP (51% Member Interest) Ciner Wyoming LLC 18

About Ciner Group Established in 1978, Ciner Group is primarily active in energy, mining, shipping and media and is one of the largest conglomerates in Turkey Energy, Mining and Glass Coal & Copper Mining Soda Ash and Sodium Bicarbonate Production (Eti Soda) Glass manufacturing Electricity Generation Media Newspapers & Printing Movie & TV Production TV & Radio Broadcasting Online media Shipping Owns a fleet of 26 Bulkers, Containers, and Tankers which are managed by time charters 19

Non-GAAP Reconciliation Ciner Resources LP Quarter Ended 6/30/17 Quarter Ended 6/30/16 Net Income $17.5 $21.8 Add: Depreciation, depletion and amortization 6.5 6.4 Interest expense (net) 0.8 0.9 Equity Based Compensation 0.5 0.3 Restructuring Charges 0.3 - Adjusted EBITDA 25.6 29.4 Less: Adjusted EBITDA attributable to non-controlling interest 13.1 15.1 Adjusted EBITDA Attributable to Ciner Resources LP $12.5 $14.3 Non-GAAP Financial Measures We define Adjusted EBITDA as net income (loss) plus net interest expense, income tax, depreciation and amortization and certain other expenses that are non-cash charges or that we consider not to be indicative of ongoing operations. Adjusted EBITDA is a non-gaap supplemental financial measures that management and external users of our consolidated financial statements, such as industry analysts, investors, lenders and rating agencies, may use to assess: our operating performance as compared to other publicly traded partnerships in our industry, without regard to historical cost basis in the case of Adjusted EBITDA, or financing methods; the ability of our assets to generate sufficient cash flow to make distributions to our unitholders; our ability to incur and service debt and fund capital expenditures; and the viability of capital expenditure projects and the returns on investment of various investment opportunities. We believe that the presentation of Adjusted EBITDA in this investor presentation provides useful information to investors in assessing our financial condition and results of operations. The GAAP measures most directly comparable to Adjusted EBITDA are net income and cash flow from operations. Our non-gaap financial measure of Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered as an alternative to net income or cash flow from operations. Adjusted EBITDA has important limitations as an analytical tool because it excludes some but not all items that affect net income and cash flows from operations. You should not consider Adjusted EBITDA in isolation or as a substitute for analysis of our results as reported under GAAP. Because Adjusted EBITDA may be defined differently by other companies, including those in our industry, our definition of Adjusted EBITDA may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of other companies, thereby diminishing its utility. 20

Non-GAAP Reconciliation Ciner Resources LP Year Ended 12/31/16 Year Ended 12/31/15 Net Income $86.3 $106.2 Add: Depreciation, depletion and amortization 26.1 23.7 Interest expense (net) 3.6 4.0 Loss on disposal of assets (net) - - Restructuring Charges 0.5 - Adjusted EBITDA 116.5 133.9 Less: Adjusted EBITDA attributable to non-controlling interest 59.3 67.7 Adjusted EBITDA Attributable to Ciner Resources LP $57.2 $66.2 Non-GAAP Financial Measures We define Adjusted EBITDA as net income (loss) plus net interest expense, income tax, depreciation and amortization and certain other expenses that are non-cash charges or that we consider not to be indicative of ongoing operations. Adjusted EBITDA is a non-gaap supplemental financial measures that management and external users of our consolidated financial statements, such as industry analysts, investors, lenders and rating agencies, may use to assess: our operating performance as compared to other publicly traded partnerships in our industry, without regard to historical cost basis in the case of Adjusted EBITDA, or financing methods; the ability of our assets to generate sufficient cash flow to make distributions to our unitholders; our ability to incur and service debt and fund capital expenditures; and the viability of capital expenditure projects and the returns on investment of various investment opportunities. We believe that the presentation of Adjusted EBITDA in this investor presentation provides useful information to investors in assessing our financial condition and results of operations. The GAAP measures most directly comparable to Adjusted EBITDA are net income and cash flow from operations. Our non-gaap financial measure of Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered as an alternative to net income or cash flow from operations. Adjusted EBITDA has important limitations as an analytical tool because it excludes some but not all items that affect net income and cash flows from operations. You should not consider Adjusted EBITDA in isolation or as a substitute for analysis of our results as reported under GAAP. Because Adjusted EBITDA may be defined differently by other companies, including those in our industry, our definition of Adjusted EBITDA may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of other companies, thereby diminishing its utility. 21

Non-GAAP Reconciliation Coverage Ratio The following table presents a reconciliation of the non-gaap financial measures of Adjusted EBITDA to GAAP financial measure of net income for the periods presented: 22

Capital Structure Capitalization Ciner Resources Available Liquidity ($ in millions) As of June 30, 2017 ($ in millions) Facility Size Available Liquidity Cash and Cash Equivalents $15.8 Long Term Debt Ciner Wyoming Credit Facility $109.0 Revenue Bonds due 2017 8.6 Revenue Bonds due 2018 11.4 CINR Revolving Credit Facility 0.0 Total Long Term Debt $129.0 Total Equity $249.8 Total Capitalization $378.8 Revolving Credit Facility $10.0 $10.0 Ciner Wyoming Credit Facility 190.0 61.0 (1) Total $200.0 $71.0 (1) Includes outstanding borrowing of $78.0 mn and $20 mn of revenue bonds. 23

IDR Structure CINR IDR Structure Marginal Percentage Interest in Distributions Distribution per Unit Range (expressed as % of MQD) LP Share GP Share From To Initial Split 98% 2% 0% -- 115% 2nd Split 85% 15% 115% -- 125% 3rd Split 75% 25% 125% -- 150% 4th Split 50% 50% 150% -- above 24