TECH M&A. Leaders Survey October 2017

Similar documents
2016 S E M I - A N N U A L L E A D E R S S U R V E Y

L E A D E R S S U R V E Y

TECH M&A. Leaders Survey April 2018

MoneyTree TM China TMT Report

CIF Sector Recommendation Report (Fall 2012)

The Business Environment Facing Emerging Companies Today

Q The Biannual Outlook of the Tech Deal Community

featured article Default Cycle Kept at Bay. for Now By: Phil Van Winkle and Jon Morrison The Case for an Increase in Corporate Defaults

FALL 2018 AGRICULTURAL LENDER SURVEY RESULTS

Executive summary 1. Volume, size, and type of deals to come 4. Headwinds, obstacles, and M&A drivers 8. Strategic drivers 10.

What Should the Fed Do?

BANK EXECUTIVE BUSINESS OUTLOOK SURVEY 2015, Q2

Venture Capital 4% Strategy. Mega/Large Buyout 29% Highlights from the 2016 GP Dashboard include:

The Business Environment Facing Emerging Companies Today

CORRECTION PERSPECTIVES

WHITE PAPER VENUE MARKET SPOTLIGHT. M&A Financing Edition. DFINsolutions.com

Business Products and Services: McGladrey Quarterly Private Equity Deal

Zacks Earning Trends

Weekly Economic Commentary

Knee Deep In An Earnings Recession

Navigating U.S. Investment Markets

Quarterly General Fund Revenue Report JANUARY 2017 BARRY BOARDMAN, PH.D.

CIF Sector Recommendation Report (Fall 2012)

Manufacturing Barometer

Ashdon Investment Management Q ECONOMIC COMMENTARY

2013 M&A Outlook Survey

Fourth Quarter Market Outlook. Jason Bulinski, CFA Donald A. Powell, CFA Joseph Styrna, CFA

Executive summary WORLD EMPLOYMENT SOCIAL OUTLOOK

BVCA Private Equity and Venture Capital Performance Measurement Survey 2010

Hedge Fund. Compensation Report SAMPLE REPORT

CORPORATE BEIGE BOOK:

UPDATE ON GROWTH AND VALUE STOCKS

All data published in this report is available on FactSet. Please contact or FACTSET for more information.

NFIB SMALL BUSINESS. William C. Dunkelberg Holly Wad SMALL BUSINESS OPTIMISM INDEX COMPONENTS. Seasonally Adjusted Level

Yukitoshi Funo: Economic activity and prices in Japan, and monetary policy

SURVEY OF GOVERNMENT CONTRACTOR SALES EXPECTATIONS

Private Enterprise. Behind the curtain: What mid-sized private companies need to know about what drives Private-Equity investments

Robinson Digital Marketing & Data Analytics. United States 2018 Economic Forecast Report

2Q Middle Market Indicator

PwC M&A 2012 Review and 2013 Outlook 30 January 2013

Market Report for Republic of Korea

Monthly Market Insights March 1, 2019

THE GREAT DECLINE OF PUBLICLY TRADED STOCKS

Weekly Economic Commentary

NAM MANUFACTURERS OUTLOOK SURVEY SECOND QUARTER 2018 JUNE 20, 2018

61.0% (June: 61.7%) 41.8 (June: 42.3) 1.9% 2.1% 0.4% 0.8% 0.4% 0.8% 0.7% 1.7% 8.5% Manufacturing Outlook. Expected Growth Rate Over the Next 12 Months

Goldman Sachs Presentation to Sanford C. Bernstein Strategic Decisions Conference Comments by Gary Cohn, President & COO May 28, 2014.

Venture Capital Insights 2Q14

ASEAN Insights: Regional trends

The Economic Outlook of Taiwan

THE 1987 CRASH: A NOT SO HAPPY ANNIVERSARY

SPIAs. Single Premium Immediate Annuities. Annuity Product Guides. Convert your retirement savings into a guaranteed lifetime income stream

Investment. Insights. Emerging Markets. Invesco Global Equity. A 2012 outlook

Global Private Equity Barometer

BANK OF FINLAND ARTICLES ON THE ECONOMY

A TALE OF TWO CHINESE CONSUMERS

How Precious Are Precious Metals?

Explore the themes and thinking behind our decisions.

JOB SITUATION INCOME. 3 rd Quarter 2015 PITTSBURGH

2012 Automotive Industry Outlook Survey:

Market Month: August 2018 The Markets (as of market close July 31, 2018)

Has the China Collapse Finally Arrived?

Northern Trust Investments is proud to sponsor this podcast Investing in a World of

Q Economic Outlook Survey Results

Private Equity & VC Compensation Report SAMPLE REPORT

Global PMI. Global economic growth kicks higher at start of fourth quarter but outlook darkens. November 14 th 2016

ANOTHER TOUGH WEEK COMMENTARY REASSURANCE KEY TAKEAWAYS LPL RESEARCH WEEKLY MARKET. October

Manufacturing Barometer

Quarterly Market Review: July-September 2018 The Markets (as of market close September 28, 2018)

Koji Ishida: Japan s economy, price developments and monetary policy

U.S. Economic Outlook: recent developments

REFLECTING ON NASDAQ 6,000

Two-Way Street: 2018 Update

Publicly-traded REITs have

China Research. Type of firm

AGRICULTURAL LENDER SURVEY RESULTS

Global Financial Crises and the U.S. Economy: A Monetary Policymaker's Perspective

Investment Perspective

Is Your Portfolio Prepared

Growth in Personal Income for Maryland Falls Slightly in Last Quarter of 2015 But state catches up to U.S. rates

William C. Dunkelberg Holly Wade SMALL BUSINESS OPTIMISM INDEX COMPONENTS

Metro Milwaukee Business Outlook Survey Fourth-Quarter, 2016

Increasing Shareholder Value Through Transaction Preparation

Overall M&A Market Commentary

Accessing capital to start or grow your business.

EQUITY STRATEGY FOCUS January, 2018

THE NEW ECONOMY RECESSION: ECONOMIC SCORECARD 2001

THE U.S. MIDDLE MARKET

MoneyTree TM China TMT Report

The Transformation of Wealth Management

Global PMI. Global economy suffers loss of momentum in March. April 10 th IHS Markit. All Rights Reserved.

U.S. Property Markets Shake Off Slowdown and Power On

HAS THE CHINA COLLAPSE FINALLY ARRIVED?

Banks at a Glance: Economic and Banking Highlights by State 4Q 2017

Hong Kong/China Market

Manufacturing Barometer

Empire State Manufacturing Survey

Jeremy Siegel s 2016 Forecast for Stocks

Value Equity Q Commentary. Market Review: Performance Analysis:

Mergers and Acquisitions

Transcription:

TECH M&A Leaders Survey October 2017

Scan the above QR code with your mobile device to download a copy of this report.

Tech M&A Leaders Survey Morrison & Foerster / 451 Research Undeterred by the recent slowdown in M&A activity, tech acquirers have largely left their bullish forecast for dealmaking unchanged. For the third consecutive time, essentially half of the respondents to the semi-annual Tech M&A Leaders Survey from 451 Research and Morrison & Foerster indicated they expected an acceleration in acquisition activity. The 51% that forecast a pick up over the next year in M&A in our most recent edition is more than twice the 19% that projected a slow-down. The results lined up very closely with the sentiments from both the year-ago survey and our previous survey in. Tech M&A Activity Outlook Forecast Change in Acquisition Activity Source: Tech M&A Leaders Survey from 451 Research / Morrison & Foerster More broadly, the outlook from the three recent surveys reflects an unusual bit of stability in what is an inherently lumpy business. A bit of history: Over the previous half-dozen years of the Tech M&A Leaders Survey from 451 Research and Morrison & Foerster, swings of 10 or even 20 percentage points from one edition to the next haven t been uncommon. The only other similar plateau registered over three consecutive survey periods came a half-decade ago. It s worth noting, too, that the October 2012 - October 2013 block was followed by the 2014 survey that marked the single highest outlook for activity that we ve ever recorded. That effervescent forecast, in which 72% of respondents forecast they would increase acquisition activity, actually came through in deal flow, with spring 2014 marking the start of a roughly 30-month boom for tech M&A. Quarterly M&A spending topped $100 billion on more than 1,000 transactions in six of the 10 quarters from mid-2014 to the end of 2016, according to 451 Research s M&A KnowledgeBase. That unprecedented streak included two of the highest quarterly spending totals we ve ever recorded. 2017 Tech M+A Leaders Survey Morrison & Foerster / 451 Research 3

Mainstays are missing Still, even as the upbeat view from many of the major acquirers in the tech market holds steady, deal volume is declining. So far this year, the number of tech and telco transactions announced across the globe is down 15% compared to the same time in the two previous years, according to 451 Research s M&A KnowledgeBase. The slump is almost entirely attributable to less shopping by corporate acquirers, including many of the mainstays of the market. For instance, our M&A KnowledgeBase doesn t have a single deal for IBM, Oracle or Salesforce.com since the end of May. U.S. Public Company M&A Top Reasons for Decline in Tech Deals by NASDAQ/NYSE Companies Source: Tech M&A Leaders Survey from 451 Research / Morrison & Foerster 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 81% 15% 53% 17% 30% 48% 25% 27% Strong factor Neutral Weak factor High valuations of targets Few suitable targets Outbidding by PE firms Corporate acquirers including both C-level executives and corporate development officers represent the largest single group of respondents to our survey. Asked why U.S. publicly traded companies are on pace in 2017 for a third straight year of declining deal volume, our respondents overwhelmingly responded with the familiar reason that the companies they wanted to buy are too expensive. Some eight of 10 (81%) said high valuations of target companies are crimping deal flow, compared to just one in 20 (4%) who said pricing wasn t affecting deal. 2017 Tech M+A Leaders Survey Morrison & Foerster / 451 Research 4

Tech M&A Valuation Outlook Forecast Change in Private Company M&A Valuations Source: Tech M&A Leaders Survey from 451 Research / Morrison & Foerster 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 10% 43% 2012 28% 25% October 2012 14% 53% 2013 21% 36% October 2013 11% 48% 2014 34% 26% October 2014 18% 50% 2015 52% 18% October 2015 64% 19% 2016 40% 26% October 2016 31% 33% 2017 31% 24% Sept. 2017 Increase Decrease Looking ahead, that pricing pressure isn t expected to ease, at least when it comes to the prototypical tech deal involving a private company target. A plurality of respondents (45%) to the Tech M&A Leaders Survey from 451 Research and Morrison & Foerster indicated startup M&A valuations would remain unchanged over the next 12 months. Those who did forecast a change were slightly more likely to see startup pricing coming down (31%) than ticking higher (24%). Buyers have now voiced a bearish outlook for private company M&A valuations in four of the past five surveys. Financials vs. strategics Returning to the specific question of why companies traded on the NYSE and NASDAQ aren t picking up more tech companies, valuation also figured into the third-highest ranked reason for the decline. However, it is a new trend that is shifting billions of dollars in acquisition spending. While the main reason (a large bid/ask gap) is the perennial complaint from dealmakers in any market, the third-ranked reason indicates a dramatic shift in the tech M&A market: corporate acquirers being outbid by financial acquirers. Nearly half (48%) of the respondents to the Tech M&A Leaders Survey from 451 Research and Morrison & Foerster said outbidding by private equity (PE) acquirers is a primary cause of the declining number of tech deals announced by US-listed acquirers. 2017 Tech M+A Leaders Survey Morrison & Foerster / 451 Research 5

Tech M&A Outlook Forecast Change in PE Competition vs. Strategic Acquirers Source: Tech M&A Leaders Survey from 451 Research / Morrison & Foerster Decrease 5% Increase 53% No Change 42% What s more, our survey respondents overwhelmingly forecast PE firms over the next year will put even more distance between themselves and the long-time tech M&A market leaders, corporate acquirers. Ten times more dealmakers we surveyed said PE firms will be more competitive over the next twelve months than said the buyout shops would be less competitive. (Just 5% forecast corporate acquirers would face less competition from their financial rivals, while 53% forecast an increase.) According to 451 Research s M&A KnowledgeBase, 2017 marks the first year in history that PE firms have announced more tech acquisitions than companies listed on US exchanges. As recently as 2014, public companies announced twice as many deals as their financial rivals. PE pays up The main reason PE shops have been so busy, according to Tech M&A Leaders Survey from 451 Research and Morrison & Foerster, is that they have done away with their traditional bargain-hunting. Fully nine of 10 (92%) of respondents said the surge of PE activity, which has seen deal volume double over the past half-decade, is largely due to buyout shops willingness to pay higher valuations. Of course, the firms can only pay these higher prices because of the unprecedented amount of money they have to spend. (The exact amount of uninvested capital specifically dedicated to tech M&A isn t known, but most observers size it in the low hundreds of billions of dollars.) Nearly 90% of our survey respondents said the record cash holdings at PE firms are a strong contributor to their increased activity. 2017 Tech M+A Leaders Survey Morrison & Foerster / 451 Research 6

Tech M&A Valuatons Characterizations of Prices Paid by PE Firms Source: M&A Leaders Survey from 451 Research / Morrison & Foerster Too Low 3% Too High 66% About Right 31% In paying the prices they are paying, PE firms may be suffering a little irrational exuberance, according to our survey. Two-thirds of respondents (66%) said buyout firms are overpaying in their deals, including 12% who said valuations in sponsor-backed deals are much too high. On the other hand, just 3% of respondents said valuations in PE deals are too low with the remaining 31% saying pricing is about right. A broad analysis of PE deals so far in 2017 in 451 Research s M&A KnowledgeBase indicates valuations have varied according to market segment. In transactions valued at more than $1billion, financial acquirers have actually paid lower multiples than strategics. On the other hand, PE firms paid above-market multiples in mid-market transactions, roughly defined as deals valued at $200 million - $800 million. Exits not clearly marked Beyond simply having more money to spend, PE firms have accelerated their activity by broadening the range of companies they spend their ever-increasing amounts of money on. Think of small software startups that are burning cash and are likely several years away from producing any significant EBITDA. (Historically, cash flow has been the key to PE deals, as a way to service the debt that almost invariably gets ladled onto the acquired company.) In the Tech M&A Leaders Survey from 451 Research and Morrison & Foerster, nearly three-quarters (72%) of respondents said the huge increase in deals in recent years has been strongly influenced by PE firms going after non-traditional targets. For instance, in a separate question, 74% forecast an increase over the next two years in the number of PE acquisitions of growth companies, as opposed to mature businesses that buyout firms have targeted more often in past transactions. 2017 Tech M+A Leaders Survey Morrison & Foerster / 451 Research 7

Tech M&A Outlook Forecast Exit Environment for PE Companies Through 2020 Source: M&A Leaders Survey from 451 Research / Morrison & Foerster Favorable 38% Unfavorable 45% No Change 17% With buyout firms holding record levels of cash and enjoying an expanding pool of targets, the overwhelming sentiment from the Tech M&A Leaders Survey from 451 Research and Morrison & Foerster is that PE shops won t have difficulties adding to their portfolios. However, our respondents weren t anywhere near as bullish on the ability of PE firms to reduce their holdings. More people said the exit environment for buyout shops over the next three years will be unfavorable than favorable (45% vs. 38%). In a separate question, respondents indicated sales of portfolio companies to corporate acquirers as the most likely exit path through 2020, followed by sales to fellow PE shops. Those so-called secondary transactions, which can be unpopular among the investors in the PE funds, have increased roughly tenfold since the recession, according to 451 Research s M&A KnowledgeBase. 2017 Tech M+A Leaders Survey Morrison & Foerster / 451 Research 8

U.S.-China M&A Forecast for Chinese Acquisitions of North American Tech Companies Source: M&A Leaders Survey from 451 Research / Morrison & Foerster Increase 7% No Change 14% Decrease 79% A Great Wall for U.S.-Sino M&A Finally, on a very timely topic, survey respondents overwhelmingly forecast that already-strained M&A ties between the world s two largest economies will likely deteriorate even more under the Trump administration. Nearly eight in ten (79%) respondents to our survey said Chinese acquisitions of North American tech companies will decline under the current presidency, more than ten times the 7% that expect an acceleration in deal making. The most-recent outlook for U.S.-China M&A activity is even more bearish than the results of our survey, when 65% forecast a decrease in outbound activity by Chinese buyers and 14% forecast an increase. One reason for the notable erosion in the outlook from spring to fall could have to do with the fact that, while we were surveying in our current edition, there was a direct example of why Chinese acquirers may hold off on U.S. acquisitions: In mid-september, President Trump officially killed the planned $1.3 billion purchase of US firm Lattice Semiconductor by a Beijing-based fund on national security grounds. About the survey: Now in its 12th edition, the Tech M&A Leaders Survey from 451 Research and Morrison & Foerster drew 142 responses, primarily from corporate or M&A executives (40% of respondents) and investment bankers (29%), with the remaining responses coming from lawyers, VCs, PE professionals and others in the M&A community. Roughly three-quarters of responses came from dealmakers and advisers based in the US; Silicon Valley represented the largest single location, accounting for 35% of the total, followed by China, which accounted for 10% of respondents. 2017 Tech M+A Leaders Survey Morrison & Foerster / 451 Research 9

2017 Morrison & Foerster LLP