USACE Policy Guidance on Contributed Funds and Section 408

Similar documents
US Army Corps of Engineers South Pacific Division. CMANC Eureka, CA October 2008

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY U. S. Army Corps of Engineers CECW-CP Washington, DC APPENDIX F CONTINUING AUTHORITIES PROGRAM TABLE OF CONTENTS

US Army Corps of Engineers PAYING FOR PROJECTS. Kim Smith Office of Water Project Review Planning and Policy Division HQUSACE

Dredged Material Management Plans (DMMPs)

USACE Navigation FY 2014 Workplan and FY 2015 Budget

Frequently Asked Questions: Civil Works Budget Development Transformation (Watershed / System-Based Budget Development)

Future Directions for Civil Works Project Delivery and Partnership

FOR - ARRA Financial and Operational Review Report Investigations

USACE Navigation Program

APPENDIX F CONTINUING AUTHORITIES PROGRAM TABLE OF CONTENTS

Implementing Asset Management for the USACE Navigation Business Line

Federal Discount Rate for Fiscal Year 2018

AAPA HMT Proposal H&N Committee Briefing

Sustaining the Civil Works Program

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS 441 G STREET NW WASHINGTON, D.C

USACE Civil Works Headquarters Perspective

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY EC U.S. Army Corps of Engineers CECW-I Washington, D.C Circular No May 2011

USACE Infrastructure Strategy: UIS Overview and P3 Review

CONTINUING AUTHORITIES PROGRAM REGIONAL PROGRAMMATIC REVIEW PLAN FOR DECISION DOCUMENTS

Western Dredging Association Eastern Chapter Annual Meeting Infrastructure Strategy Overview and P3/P4 Review

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY EC U.S. Army Corps of Engineers CECW-I Washington, D.C

The Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY. u.s. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS WASHINGTON, D.C

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY EC US Army Corps of Engineers CECW-CP Washington, DC Circular No July 2014

Building the Future D A.. DAVIDSON DA CONFERENCE SEPTEMBER 11, 2012

Building the Planning Portfolio

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY EC U.S. Army Corps of Engineers CECW-I Washington, D.C Circular No March 2014

USACE Planning 101 Planning Basics for Partners

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Navigation Program Update

SUMMARY OF RECENT USACE PLANNING POLICY UPDATES: SEPTEMBER MARCH 2019

Water Supply Workshop Savannah, Georgia 31 May 2 June 2011 Funding of Water Supply Reallocation Studies

The FY 2012 Budget. California Marine and Navigation Conference. Gary A. Loew Chief, Programs Integration Division Civil Works Directorate, HQUSACE

REVIEW PLAN. Panama City Harbor Improvements to Bay Harbor Channel. Limited Reevaluation Report (LRR) with Integrated

North Carolina Department of Transportation Wetland and Stream Mitigation

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY EC U.S. Army Corps of Engineers CECW-I Washington, D. C Circular No June 2017

REVIEW PLAN USING THE NWD MODEL REVIEW PLAN

[Letter to be printed on official Levee Sponsor letterhead]

Project Planning with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

CHAPTER 3. Corps Civil Works Missions

The Breadth of the Planning Portfolio

Distribution Restriction Statement Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

FINAL INTEGRATED GENERAL REEVALUATION REPORT AND SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT ADDENDUM

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY EC U.S. Army Corps of Engineers CECW-IP Washington, D. C

REAL ESTATE A GUIDE FOR PROJECT PARTNERS

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS WASHINGTON, D.C

EC Civil Works Review Policy

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS 441 G STREET NW WASHINGTON, D.C AUG 2339

REVIEW PLAN. Cedar Bayou, Texas Dredged Material Management Plan

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY EC U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 441 G Street, NW CECW-I Washington, D.C

Proposed Report 1 DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY CHIEF OF ENGINEERS 2600 ARMY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY EC U.S. Army Corps of Engineers CECW-IP Washington, D. C

Dear Speaker Ryan, Leader McConnell, Leader Pelosi, and Leader Schumer:

Norfolk Flood Risk Management Study

U.S. Updates: Climate Change, Maintenance and Investigations

ASBPA PARTNERING COMMITTEE S GUIDANCE ON INCORPORATING SURFING CONCERNS INTO PLANNING AND DESIGN OF FEDERAL SHORE PROTECTION AND NAVIGATION PROJECTS

SUBJECT: Amite River and Tributaries, Louisiana, East Baton Rouge Parish Watershed

Texoma/Missouri River SAME Regional Implementation of ARRA

NAFSMA Annual Meeting July 10, 2018

SECTION Watershed Informed Approach to FY 2016 Budget Development

Levee Safety The Middle Age Of Levee Safety Development

ASCE Federal Project BCR and Scoring Information Paper 27 April 2018

PROJECT REVIEW PLAN MOORING BASIN MODIFICATIONS GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, TEXAS OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE DISCRETIONARY AUTHORITY DECISION DOCUMENT

PROJECT REVIEW PLAN INDEPENDENT TECHNICAL REVIEW AND EXTERNAL PEER REVIEW

Inland Marine Transportation System Capital Investment Strategy USACE Overview

The Increasing Challenge of Keeping the Nation's Waterways Reliable

Public Notice. Activity: Fort Worth District Mitigation Banks. Date: January 24, 2019

REVIEW PLAN LOCKS AND DAMS 52 AND 53 REPLACEMENT PROJECT (OLMSTED LOCK AND DAM), IL & KY POST-AUTHORIZATION CHANGE REPORT LOUISVILLE DISTRICT

CHAPTER 16- RECREATION DEVELOPMENT POLICY FOR OUTGRANTED CORPS LANDS

AGC-US Army Corps of Engineers MILCON/Civil Works Policy Meeting 2018 Federal Contractors Conference Pentagon City, VA May 3, 2018 MEETING AGENDA

Meeting the Nation s Levee Challenges

2018 BUDGET LETTER. 111 East Loop North Houston, Texas PortHouston.com

MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE AND THE U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS

Final Draft Feasibility Study And Environmental Assessment APPENDIX F MODEL PROJECT COOPERATION AGREEMENT. November 2008

CONTINUING AUTHORITIES PROJECT (CAP) Federal Interest Determination

Great Lakes Navigation System Five-Year Development Plan. Great Lakes System

Inland Waterways: Recent Proposals and Issues for Congress

Distribution Restriction Statement Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

SUBJECT: EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT FOR JANUARY 19, 2017 WATER INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE NATION (WIIN) ACT

Position Statement on a 2018 Water Resources Development Act (WRDA)

Summary of the Senate-passed S. 601 Water Resources Development Act of 2013

REVIEW PLAN. Waukegan Outer Harbor, Waukegan, IL Interim Dredged Material Management Plan. Chicago District

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers FY 2017 Workplan and FY 2018 Budget for Inland Waterways

NEWPORT BEACH HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL. City Manager's Office Dave Kitt, City Manager ,

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS WASHINGTON, D.C

Highlights from the Congressional Research Service Report Inland Waterways: Recent Proposals and Issues For Congress (October 18, 2013)

Inland Waterways: Recent Proposals and Issues For Congress

PRESQUE ISLE ERIE, PENNSYLVANIA CG CAP SECTION 204 REGIONAL SEDIMENT MANAGEMENT BENEFICIAL USE OF DREDGED MATERIAL. Project No.

S. ll IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES A BILL

CHAPTER 17 NON-RECREATION OUTGRANT POLICY

Community Facilities District No. 4 (Seabridge at Mandalay Bay) 2017/18 Annual Report

GOAL 1: Protect coastal resources and human life and limit public expenditures in areas that are subject to destruction by natural disasters..

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS SOUTH ATLANTIC DIVISION 60 FORSYTH ST, SW, ROOM 10M15 ATLANTA, GEORGIA

Upper Mississippi River Basin Association

Olmsted Locks & Dam. Inland Waterways Users Board MR. DAVID DALE, PE, PMP, SES. DIRECTOR, Programs Great Lakes & Ohio River Division 25 February 2015

CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT: IN 03

US Army Corps of Engineers Dam Safety

LETTER REPORT BAYOU SORREL LOCK REPLACEMENT, LOUISIANA POST AUTHORIZATION CHANGE STUDY

SPECIAL EVENT APPLICATION U.S. Army, Corps of Engineers (USACE) Lake Lanier (Effective 01 January 2016)

REVIEW PLAN. Bayport Ship Channel and Barbours Cut Channel

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY. u.s. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS 441 G STREET NW WASHINGTON DC DIRECTOR OF CIVIL WORKS' POLICY MEMORANDUM CWPM

Transcription:

USACE Policy Guidance on Contributed Funds and Section 408 Jessica Burton Evans Navigation Program Manager Presentation to California Marine Affairs & Navigation Conference (CMANC) 16 January 2014 Redondo Beach, CA US Army Corps of Engineers As BUILDING of 13 Jan 14 STRONG BUILDING STRONG 1 BUILDING STRONG FROM NEW MEXICO ALL THE WAY TO THE PACIFIC!

Navigation Mission To provide safe, reliable, and efficient waterborne transportation systems (channels, harbors, and waterways) for the movement of commerce, national security needs and recreation. BUILDING STRONG 2

Navigation Mission 13,000 miles of Coastal Navigation Channels 12,000 miles of Inland Navigation Channels 926 Harbors BUILDING STRONG 3

BUILDING STRONG 4

The Color of Your Money Accelerated Funds Non-Federal Sponsor provides funds early, within total cost-share amount. Credit given only if additional federal funds are provided. Advanced Funds Non-Federal funds provided as an advance of the federal share or in the absence of federal funding Potential for repayment or credit BUILDING STRONG 5

The Color of Your Money Contributed Funds Non-federal funds provided in excess of required cost-share amount No repayment or credit BUILDING STRONG 6

Contributed Funds Section 111 of the FY 2012 Energy & Water Appropriation Acts amended, 33 USC 701(h). Guidance issued in April 12, 2012 memo. Funds are voluntarily provided above statutory requirements No repayment, but will refund unobligated contributed funds Congressional Notification required Can be accepted for planning, design, construction and O&M 7 BUILDING STRONG 7

Contributed Funds Flowchart (1) Sponsor and District info exchange; initiate process (2) MSC Notice (6) Notice to ASA/HQ, MSC/District/Sponsor (7) Use Model Agreement? Y/N (3) HQ RIT & Programs Review /Coordination (4) ASA(CW)/OMB Yes (8) MSC Commander Approve No (8) MSC, HQ RIT to Director Civil Works Approval (5) Congressional Committee House and Senate Notification/ Acknowledgement (9) District accepts funds and begins work BUILDING STRONG 8

Model Agreements Model MOAs that are currently available: 1. No federal funds available 2. Federal funds are available http://www.usace.army.mil/missions/civilwor ks/projectpartneshipagreements.aspx 9 BUILDING STRONG 9

Contributed Funds Flowchart (1) Sponsor and District info exchange; initiate process (2) MSC Notice (6) Notice to ASA/HQ, MSC/District/Sponsor (7) Use Model Agreement? Y/N (3) HQ RIT & Programs Review /Coordination (4) ASA(CW)/OMB Yes (8) MSC Commander Approve No (8) MSC, HQ RIT to Director Civil Works Approval (5) Congressional Committee House and Senate Notification/ Acknowledgement (9) District accepts funds and begins work BUILDING STRONG 10

Contributed Funds Flowchart (1) Sponsor and District info exchange; initiate process (6) Notice to ASA/HQ, MSC/District/Sponsor (2) MSC Notice (3) HQ RIT & Programs Review /Coordination (4) ASA(CW)/OMB (7) Use Model Agreement? Y/N 6 to 12+ Months Yes (8) MSC Commander Approve No (8) MSC, HQ RIT to Director Civil Works Approval (5) Congressional Committee House and Senate Notification/ Acknowledgement (9) District accepts funds and begins work BUILDING STRONG 11

BUILDING STRONG 12

MODIFICATION OF US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS PROJECTS PURSUANT TO 33 USC 408 BUILDING STRONG 13

SECTION 408 PERMITS BUILDING STRONG 14

Section 408 Permits Modifications that go beyond the normal O&M Includes modifications to channels, structures, or placement sites Can be associated with Section 404/10 permit actions. Examples: utility crossing, dock/wharf that would otherwise encroach on the federal project, sediment traps, advanced maintenance BUILDING STRONG 15

Requesting a 408 Permit 1. A written request by the non-federal interests for approval of the project modification/alteration. 2. A physical &functional description of the existing project. 3. A detailed description of the proposed modification. 4. The purpose/need for the modification. 5. A description of any related, ongoing Corps studies/efforts in the watershed. 6. A Public Interest Determination. 7. Appropriate NEPA documentation. 8. Any Administrative Record. 9. A discussion of indirect effects. 10. A discussion of E.O. 11988 Considerations. 11. Technical Analysis. Step 1 Talk to your local USACE District BUILDING STRONG 16

Questions? Jessica Burton Evans Navigation Program Manager (415) 503-6862 Jessica.L.BurtonEvans@usace.army.mil BUILDING STRONG 17