Conversion Into Pure Port Play Comes at

Similar documents
Video March 1, StratTV at the TMT Conference. Watch the video: Related Research

Interview with CFO Stephen Nolan

2017 Results Largely In Line

Can P-VOD Save Hollywood?

Field Trip Takeaways: Sustained Focus on Network Efficiency

Research Tactical Idea

2018 Hong Kong Summit Feedback

Tobacco Pricing Power Far From Extinguished

January TIC Data Update: Overseas Investors Decreased Agency MBS by $3.6bn

First Take: Building on the core

Who s Using XBRL Data & Why: Case Studies

Steel March 15, Mid-Quarter Guidance Preview: Looking

Deep Discount Cigarette Share Gains Elevate Pricing Concerns

1st Take: FDA wants to educate US physicians about the basics of biosimilars

ASEAN4 Most Productive Companies

Paradise. 4Q13: In line with consensus

1st Take: November Sales On Track Despite YoY Decline

Slower near-term momentum but we expect long-term targets to be reached in OW

COSCO SHIPPING Ports Limited. 3QFY17 Results

1Q16 EPS Above Lowered Expectations

Our Thoughts On the Preannouncement

CAR Inc. May 18, 2016

Research Tactical Idea

XL Group PLC February 3, 2016

USD Sensitivity. Source: Getty Images

SHARED AUTONOMY. Adam Jonas, CFA Apple is covered by Katy Huberty; Google is covered by Brian Nowak

Acquisition of Lafarge/Holcim assets

Proposed China Tariff on US Pork Negative for HRL/TSN

No Substitute for Execution; Remain OW

Weaker NPAT, driven by higher. formation; LDR over 100%

Visa Inc. February 29, 2016

1st Take: Stronger than Expected December Shipments Thanks to Upturn

BorsodChem MDI Suspension Likely to Further Boost Market Sentiment; Positive for Wanhua

Making the Right Moves in Sports Betting

1st Take: OJK suspends new account opening

Canadian Pacific Railway Ltd. (CP.N) Closed Research Tactical Idea

Lowering Outlook Following 3Q, Merger Filing Forecast

In the Penalty Box But Valuation Remains Compelling

ACCC, A4ANZ, BARA & BARNZ vs Airports, MQA in the ASX100

The Worst Behind Them; Raising PT, Upgrade to EW

Indra May 12, Problem contracts & elections drive significant 1Q15 shortfall. Problem contracts and elections falling away drove a topline miss

New Pipeline Investment Supportive, But We Still See Downside to Consensus

More Visibility on FY After Q1 Upside, But Valuation Now Appropriate

Earnings Observations: EPS Beats Driving Outsized Moves, Where to Go from Here

Healthcare Premium Priced In

Should We Be Concerned About Industrial Exposure?

Kohl's May 14, Not So Great 1Q; Bull Thesis Fading

2018 Guidance Reduction Sets an Achievable Bar

Portfolio Strategy. The Endowment Model: Theory and More Experience

NagaCorp March 19, 2015

Sinisi's Shop Food Retail Pricing Study (Vol. 45, August '18)

Ctrip.com December 11, 2015

Strong Underlying Metrics Point To Upside Potential

4Q15 Miss: Yet Refiners Hit Seasonal Inflection

CTSH: Is The Bar Low Enough?

Making Both Sides Count; Reiterate OW

Raiffeisen International

March 22, Is An Ultra-Bear Scenario in Play?

Closed-End Equity Funds

COSCO Pacific Limited

Corporate Travel Survey 2018 Stronger Trends: Intra-EU & Asia Are Key Drivers

Q Conference October 18 th, 2006 Santa Barbara, CA

Nike Inc. October 15, 2015

The Robotic Dilemma. Do surgical robots equate to an existential dilemma for SN's orthopedics business? Overweight. Attractive.

Balanced Portfolio and Gross Margin Upside Drive 1Q Results

Industry Analysis. BRICs and Motors

Price/Earnings Ratios, Risk Premiums and the g* Adjustment

4Q17 Net Profit Slightly Below Consensus Due to Non-Op

7 Key Takes from Meetings with SFM Management

Green Dot Corp February 25, 2016

Coffee Talk: A Look at February US Scanner Data

Asia Pacific Summit Feedback

Emergency Liquidity Assistance in the Euro Area

Model Updates. March 15, Healthcare Services & Distribution MORGAN STANLEY RESEARCH. Ashley E Ponce

Prudent Bet On Low Oil Prices

2Q16: External Pressures Return

Global Strategy Forum: Renaissance Meets Reality

Our Thoughts on Biosimilar hype

4Q15 Earnings Preview

RenaissanceRe February 4, 2016

Baby Steps. Equal-weight. Attractive

PASPA Overturned: US Sports Betting To Open Up

Huiyin Household Ap 1280 HK

Mixed Bag in 2Q, Array Growth Accelerates

IHS Inc. March 9, 2016

March 22, Facing Headwinds

Strong 4Q15 Results. Stock Rating Equal-weight. Price target $7.50. Industry View In-Line

1Q Report Doesn't Answer Main Question; Stay EW

Structural Headwinds Likely Continue Beyond 2017

Expect a Slight EPS Miss, But Revenue Miss Could be the Bigger Story

Huiyin Household App 1280 HK

3Q15: The Inevitable "Bump in the Road" Quarter

Letter from New York. In-Line. Equal-weight $ What's new: we hosted a day of investor meetings in NY with Dunkin Brand CFO Paul Carbone.

Highly Levered In A Rising Market

Some Puts and Takes in Q2; Thesis Unchanged, Stay EW

DRAGON CROWN GROUP HOLDINGS (935.HK) 1H 2013 Review: Bucked the Trend. Company Profile. 1-Yr Price Performance vs. HSI. Basic Share Information

GoPro Inc January 13, 2016

Upbeat Tone in Barcelona - Questions

Transcription:

April 13, 2016 COSCO Pacific Conversion Into Pure Port Play Comes at a Cost; Maintain EW Industry View In-Line Stock Rating Equal-weight Price Target HK$9.07 While we welcome the outcome of the restructuring that has converted Cosco Pacific into a pure global port operator by trading out of its container leasing (Florens) business, we cut our earnings and PT in view of sustained weakness in global trade demand. What's Changed? From: To: COSCO Pacific Price Target HK$10.94 HK$9.07 A pure play port operator: With the sale of Florens Container Holdings Ltd, port earnings now contribute 100% of CPL s bottomline, which should support a potential re-rating given the perceived valuation discount led by market concerns about its exposure to the low-return container leasing business. However, we think any immediate market optimism is likely to be constrained by a potential earnings shortfall led by the acquisition of China Shipping Ports Development (CSPD) at high valuation multiples (47.2x 2014 P/E) as well as overall demand weakness for the port industry. In our view, it will take time for CPL to demonstrate its real competency as a pure port operator by delivering solid earnings growth for the next 2-3 years. Net profit cut 9-18%: Our earnings cuts factor in the discontinuation of Florens as well as contributions from the newly acquired CSPD and Kumport terminals. However, for 2016-18e, we now project lower traffic growth at 7.2%, 5.8% and 1.6% p.a., in view of sluggish external demand for China s exports. Our earnings are 6-12% below consensus, as we expect 22% YoY and 2% YoY earnings declines in 2016 and 2017, followed by 7% growth in 2018. PT cut to HK$9.07: This reflects our lower earnings estimates, and we also allocate a higher probability to our bear case scenario (to 30% from 10%) to reflect more downside volume risks due to sustained macro headwinds. Our new PT implies 1% upside potential to current share price, so we maintain an EW. Valuation: The share price is down 20% in the past 12 months [vs 26% for HSI], and now trades at 11.5x 2016e P/E, in line with its historical mean of 12.4x, which we believe is fair. In the nearer-term, the special DPS of HK$0.8 for the business restructuring plan's approval, implies a total dividend yield of 12% for 2016, which provides some share price support. Risks: Upside risks to our price target include: 1) higher valuation multiples by the market; 2) higher-than-expected volume growth. Downside risks include: 1) currency depreciation risks; 2) overpaying for M&As. MORGAN STANLEY ASIA LIMITED+ Edward H Xu, CFA Edward.Xu@morganstanley.com Qianlei Fan, CFA Qianlei.Fan@morganstanley.com Watson Lau Watson.Lau@morganstanley.com Yufei Wu Yufei.Wu@morganstanley.com COSCO Pacific ( 1199.HK, 1199 HK ) +852 2239-1521 +852 2239-1875 +852 2239-1523 +852 2239-7505 Hong Kong/China Transportation & Infrastructure / China Stock Rating Equal-weight Industry View In-Line Price target HK$9.07 Up/downside to price target (%) 1 Shr price, close (Apr 12, 2016) HK$9.02 52-Week Range HK$11.74-7.11 Sh out, dil, curr (mn) 2,712 Mkt cap, curr (mn) US$3,154 EV, curr (mn) US$4,628 Avg daily trading value (mn) HK$57 Fiscal Year Ending 12/15 12/16e 12/17e 12/18e ModelWare EPS (US$) 0.13 0.10 0.10 0.11 Prior ModelWare EPS 0.11 0.12 0.13 - (US$) Consensus EPS (US$) 0.10 0.11 0.11 0.11 Revenue, net (US$ mn) 798 1,173 1,144 1,205 EBITDA (US$ mn) 618 653 683 749 ModelWare net inc 382 299 292 314 (US$ mn) P/E 7.8 11.5 11.8 11.0 P/BV 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.7 RNOA (%) 5.7 5.4 4.8 5.1 ROE (%) 8.0 6.2 6.0 6.4 EV/EBITDA 7.2 8.6 8.7 8.1 Div yld (%) 5.1 3.5 3.4 3.6 FCF yld ratio (%) (5.4) (20.4) (0.9) 1.1 Leverage (EOP) (%) 23.9 44.2 50.3 50.0 Unless otherwise noted, all metrics are based on Morgan Stanley ModelWare framework = Consensus data is provided by Thomson Reuters Estimates e = Morgan Stanley Research estimates Morgan Stanley does and seeks to do business with companies covered in Morgan Stanley Research. As a result, investors should be aware that the firm may have a conflict of interest that could affect the objectivity of Morgan Stanley Research. Investors should consider Morgan Stanley Research as only a single factor in making their investment decision. For analyst certification and other important disclosures, refer to the Disclosure Section, located at the end of this report. += Analysts employed by non -U.S. affiliates are not registered w ith FINRA, may n ot be associated person s of th e member an d may n ot be su bject to NASD/NYSE restrictions on communications w ith a subject company, public appearances and trading securities held by a research analyst account. 1

CPL: Financial Summary Exhibit 1: CPL: Financial Summary, 2014-18E Profit and Loss Statement (US$ mn) 2014 2015 2016E 2017E 2018E Ratio Analysis 2014 2015 2016E 2017E 2018E Turnover 870 798 1,173 1,144 1,205 Growth (%) Operating expenses (654) (598) (962) (942) (978) Turnover 8.9 (8.3) 47.0 (2.5) 5.3 Other operating income 23 27 2 3 3 Operating profit 14.8 (8.6) 60.7 (2.1) 3.9 Operating profit 239 227 213 205 230 Shar of profit from associates (25.2) 2.9 10.7 8.0 11.5 Finance costs (58) (43) (70) (88) (107) Share of profit from JCEs 22.5 7.9 11.8 11.8 9.9 Share of profit from associates 71 74 81 88 98 Pretax profit (53.1) 26.1 (22.3) (1.6) 8.4 Share of profit from JCEs 100 108 120 134 148 Net profit (58.3) 30.4 (21.5) (2.4) 7.4 Profit before taxation 352 444 345 340 368 Recurrent net profit 2.3 30.4 (21.5) (2.4) 7.4 Taxation (39) (41) (32) (32) (36) Port EBITDA 10.2 4.6 3.8 6.5 6.5 Minority interest (20) (21) (13) (16) (18) EBITDA (50.7) (0.5) 1.7 2.9 11.3 Net profit 293 382 299 292 314 EPS (58.5) 24.7 (21.9) (2.4) 7.4 Recurrent net profit 293 382 299 292 314 Recurrent EPS (5.7) 29.2 (21.5) (2.4) 7.4 DPS (58.4) 24.6 176.8 (72.6) 7.4 Port EBTIDA 275 288 299 319 339 EBITDA 410 408 415 427 475 Margins (%) Reported EPS, (US$ Cents) 10.4 12.9 10.1 9.8 10.6 Operating margin 27.4 28.4 18.2 17.9 19.1 Recurrent EPS (US$ Cents) 10.0 12.9 10.1 9.8 10.6 EBITDA margin 47.1 51.1 35.4 37.3 39.5 DPS (US$ Cents) 4.2 5.2 14.4 3.9 4.2 Net profit margin 33.6 47.8 25.5 25.5 26.1 Return (%) Balance Sheet (US$ mn) 2014 2015 2016E 2017E 2018E MW ROE 6.5 8.1 6.3 6.3 6.5 Net fixed assets 4,069 4,008 4,911 5,155 5,382 ROA 3.8 5.0 3.9 3.7 3.8 Jointly controlled entities 914 1,233 1,262 1,289 1,319 Associated companies 857 881 913 948 987 Gearing Investment securities 0 0 0 0 0 Net debt/equity (%) 18.8 23.9 44.2 50.3 50.0 Finance lease receivables 25 33 33 33 33 Net interest coverage (x) 7.1 9.5 5.9 4.9 4.4 Restricted bank deposits 0 0 0 0 0 Dividend Coverage 3.77 (3.52) (0.63) 0.62 1.29 Other assets 422 355 355 355 355 Non-current assets 6,287 6,511 7,475 7,782 8,077 Operational Analysis 2014 2015 2016E 2017E 2018E Bank balances and cash 1,116 909 166 112 278 CT8 throughput ('000 TEU) 1,640 1,576 1,576 1,576 1,576 Other current assets 214 252 70 1 1 PRC port throughput ('000 TEU) 54,927 56,039 59,780 63,131 63,900 Total current assets 1,330 1,161 236 112 279 Overseas port throughput ('000 TEU) 10,759 11,056 12,282 13,192 13,677 Current borrowings 430 261 261 261 261 Total throughput ('000 TEU) 67,326 68,671 73,638 77,899 79,152 Other current liabilities 474 352 116 14 14 Recurrent throughput ('000 TEU) 67,326 68,671 73,638 77,899 79,152 Total Current Liabilities 903 613 377 275 275 COSCON leasing rate (US$/TEU/day) 0.74 0.71 0.71 0.70 0.69 Net Assets 6,713 7,059 7,334 7,619 8,081 LT leasing rates (US$/TEU/day) 0.62 0.57 0.54 0.52 0.50 Long-term debt 1,578 1,811 2,061 2,311 2,561 ST leasing rates (US$/TEU/day) 0.51 0.40 0.45 0.46 0.46 Other long-term liabilities 76 75 75 75 75 Florens - utilisation rate (%) 97.7 98.1 98.3 98.4 98.4 Minority interests 316 310 323 339 357 Florens container purchase price (US$/T 1,898 1,694 1,900 1,950 1,950 Shareholders equity 4,742 4,863 4,875 4,894 5,088 Capital Employed 6,713 7,059 7,334 7,619 8,081 Growth% CT8 throughput 0.0 (3.9) 0.0 0.0 0.0 PRC port throughput 9.0 2.0 6.7 5.6 1.2 Cash Flow Statement (US$ mn) 2014 2015E 2016E 2017E 2018E Overseas port throughput 16.5 2.8 11.1 7.4 3.7 Pretax operating profit 410 408 415 427 475 Total throughput 9.9 2.0 7.2 5.8 1.6 Depreciation and amortisation 212 210 238 255 273 Recurrent throughput 9.9 2.0 7.2 5.8 1.6 Other non-cash items (209) 311 (787) (282) (320) COSCON leasing rate (3.0) (4.0) (1.0) (1.0) (1.0) Gross Cash Flow 413 929 (135) 401 428 LT leasing rates (5.9) (8.1) (5.5) (4.2) (3.5) Capex (198) (1,100) (600) (500) (500) ST leasing rates (18.5) (20.7) 12.1 2.6 0.0 Change in working capital 32 (85) (54) (33) - Florens container purchase price (0.9) 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 Profit tax paid (34) (41) (32) (32) (36) Dividend income from associates/jces 172 132 142 163 180 MW Valuation 2014 2015 2016E 2017E 2018E Minority interest in net income (20) (21) (13) (16) (18) P/E 12.6 7.8 11.5 11.8 11.0 Free Cash Flow 365 (186) (692) (16) 54 P/BV 0.8 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.7 Share issues 0 0 0 0 0 EV/EBITDA 8.1 7.2 8.6 8.7 8.1 Dividend paid (77) (125) (288) (273) (120) Dividend yield 3.2 5.1 3.5 3.4 3.6 Net borrowings/repayment (258) 0 250 250 250 FCF Yield 5.7-5.4-20.4-0.9 1.1 Net Cash Flow (121) (207) (743) (54) 166 Beginning Cash 1,237 1,116 909 166 112 Ending Cash 1,116 909 166 112 278 E = Morgan Stanley Estimates; NM = Not Meaningful Source: Company Data, Morgan Stanley Research ; Note: Dividend Yield does not include special dividend. 2

Risk-Reward Snapshot: COSCO Pacific (1199.HK, HK$9.02, EW, PT HK$9.07) COSCO Pacific April 13, 2016 Risk-Reward View: Fully Valued on Current Price Levels HK$ 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 Price Target HK$9.07 Bull HK$12.43 15.8x 2016e bull case P/E HK$9.02 HK$12.43 (+38%) HK$9.07 (+1%) HK$5.93 (-34%) 0 Apr-14 Oct-14 Apr-15 Oct-15 Apr-16 Oct-16 Apr-17 Price Target (Apr-17) Historical Stock Performance Current Stock Price WARNINGDONOTEDIT_RRS4RL~1199.HK~ Derived from DCF-based sum-of-the-parts, probability-weighted: bull (10%), base (60%), and bear (30%). Strong volume rebound: 10-15% port traffic growth in 2016-17e, led by improving demand outlook; tariff hikes of 5% in 2016-17e; long-term CAGR at 2% for 2014-35e. Recovery in container leasing segment. Investment Thesis Maintain EW rating given limited upside potential to our price target. Given CPL's conversion into a pure play port operator, we think a re-rating could be driven if it is able to deliver solid earnings growth in the next 2-3 years. We cut our net profit estimates by 9-18% for 2016-17 after 2015 results announcement and the disposal of container leasing with acquisition of CSPD. The stock is trading at a 2016e P/E of 11.5x look fair vs. its long-term historical average (2012-now) at 12.4x. The special DPS of HK$0.8 should provide near-term support to the share price. Key Value Drivers Volume growth Valuation of new investment projects Port tariffs Allocation of the disposal proceeds Base HK$10.09 12.8x 2016e base case P/E Bear HK$5.93 7.5x 2016e bear case P/E Moderate growth outlook: 7.2%, 5.8%, 1.6% traffic growth in 2016e, 2017e and 2018e with stable tariffs. Container leasing segment slowly recovering. Double dip: Zero volume growth in 2016-17e; no tariff hikes from 2015e onward. Container leasing segment remains sluggish. Key Upside Risks to our price target Recovery in China export and trade demand Recovery in European market Potential increase in tariffs Higher valuation multiples by the market Higher-than-expected volume growth Key Downside Risks to our price target Operating risk at specific terminals (e.g., Guangzhou Nansha, Hong Kong HIT) due to cost pressures or market competition. Double-dip in China s export growth, led by weakness in global trade demand. Exogenous risks from wars or natural disasters. Currency depreciation Overpaying for M&As 3

Investment Thesis Earnings Pressures Exist; Maintain EW We cut our PT by 17% to HK$9.07, which provides only limited upside from the current share price so we maintain our EW rating on the stock. We also cut our 2016-17e net profit by 9%-18%, to reflect the removal of Florens, and additions of CSPD and Kumport terminals, as well as a weaker traffic growth outlook. Although the business restructuring has converted CPL into a pure global port operator, we think the market is still concerned with potential earnings shortfalls due to the trading-in of CSPD assets at high valuation multiples (47.2x 2014 P/E) and overall demand weakness due to sustained global macro headwinds. In our view, it will take time for CPL to demonstrate its real competency as a pure port operator by delivering solid earnings growth for the next 2-3 years. In the nearer term, however, we view the special DPS at HK$0.8 offered by CPL as attractive. The stock is trading at 11.5x 2016e P/E and 0.7x P/BV, compared with historical means at 12.4x and 1.4x, respectively. FY2015 Review FY2015 net profit jumped 30.4% YoY to US$382m, beating MSe of US$291m and consensus of US$304m by 31%/26%, mainly led by a provision write-back of US$79m on the disposal of a 21.8% equity interest in CIMC in 2013. Excluding one-off items, recurring net profit was US$299m, up by 1.0% YoY and 3% above MSe of Rmb291m. Due to macro challenges, revenues from terminals / container leasing fell by 5.8% / 11.6% YoY, respectively, driving overall revenues down by 8.3% YoY. Gross profit decreased by 7.3% YoY, mainly led by weak performance in container leasing. Port earnings increased 6% YoY to US$224m, led by a profit turnaround of Xiamen Ocean Gate and stable performance of Piraeus. In particular, the terminals of Yantian, Qingdao Qianwan and Antwerp showed strength that drove up JCEs/associates profit by 7.9% / 2.9% YoY, respectively. COSCO Pacific also announced a final DPS of HK$0.229, bringing the total DPS to HK$0.402. This implies a 40% dividend payout ratio, in-line with FY2014 but slightly lower than MSe of 43%. 4

Exhibit 2: CPL: Summary of FY2015 Results COSCO Pacific April 13, 2016 Source: Company Data, E=Morgan Stanley Estimates Exhibit 3: CPL: FY2015 Terminals Results Exhibit 4: CPL: FY2015 Container Leasing Results Source: Company Data, Morgan Stanley Research Source: Company Data, Morgan Stanley Research 5

Exhibit 5: CPL: Terminal Throughput Volume and YoY Growth COSCO Pacific April 13, 2016 Source: Company data, Morgan Stanley Research 6

Earnings Estimates and Valuation Earnings Estimate Adjustments for 2016-17; Introducing 2018e Net Profit We cut our 2016-17e net profit forecasts by 9% and 18% to US$299m and US$292m respectively, after updating our model for the 2015 results announcement and taking into account the disposal of the container leasing business and acquisition of CSPD. We have also added in the contribution from Kumport SPA. We introduce 2018 net profit at US$314m. Detailed changes are highlighted in Exhibit 8. For container terminals, we assume 7.2%, 5.8% and 1.6% throughput growth in 2016, 2017, and 2018. We have also added contribution from Kumport SPA to the share results of associates. Our revised net profit estimates are 6%, 12% and 7% below consensus estimates for 2016-2018e respectively. Cutting PT to HK$9.07 Exhibit 6: CPL: Morgan Stanley Estimates vs. Consensus Year to Dec 31 2016E 2017E 2018E CPL (1199.HK) MS estimates USD mn 299 e 292 e 314 e Consensus estimates USD mn 320 332 336 % variance -6% -12% -7% Source: Thomson Reuters Consensus, Morgan Stanley Research estimates We continue to value CPL using a probability-weighted methodology derived from a DCF-based sum-of-theparts valuation. However, we are changing the weightings for our base-, bear- and bull-case scenarios from 70%, 10% and 20% to 60%, 10% and 30%, respectively. We lower the probability for our bull case to 10% from 20% because we see increasing pressure on macroeconomics with weak trade demand. Similarly, we raise our bear case scenario to 30% from 10% as we believe the company will be significantly affected by a slower global economic recovery as well as stagnant trade activity. Base Case: 60% weighting (previously 70%) Scenario Value: to HK$10.09 from HK$10.89 Our base-case valuation drops in part because we lower our net profit estimates by 9-18% for 2015-17, with a weaker outlook for container terminals. Moreover, we adjust our SOTP valuation to reflect the disposal of the container leasing business and added the value of CSPD. We also add the value of Kumport SPA in Turkey. In our WACC assumption for CPL s terminal valuation, we have left the variables unchanged at 14.4% cost of equity, 4.9% cost of debt and a consistent target capital structure at 67% equity and 33% debt. As a result, we apply 11.2% as a discount factor. Bull Case: 10% weighting (previously 20%) Scenario Value: to HK$12.43 from HK$13.41 previously Exhibit 7: CPL: Probability-weighted Price Target HK$ SOP valuations Prob. Prob-wt values Bull case 12.43 10% 1.24 Base case 10.09 60% 6.05 Bear case 5.93 30% 1.78 Price target 100% 9.07 Source: Morgan Stanley Research In our bull case scenario, we assume a stronger volume rebound; 10-15% port traffic growth in 2016-17e led by an improving demand outlook; tariff hikes of 5% in 16-17e, and long-term CAGR at 2% for 2014-35e. The change in our scenario value is mainly driven by our earnings cut after the disposal of container leasing business and the acquisition of CSPD. 7

Bear Case: 30% weighting (previously 10%) Scenario Value: to HK$5.93 from HK$6.40 Our bear-case scenario is based on the risk of a double dip in the global economy; nil volume growth in 2016-17e, and failure of any tariff hikes from 2016 onward. In our bear case, the magnitude of the decrease in our scenario value is the same, reflecting the same factors. The change in our scenario value is mainly driven by The change in our scenario value is mainly driven by our earnings cut after the disposal of container leasing business and the acquisition of CSPD. Exhibit 8: CPL: DCF Assumption Ports - DCF Valuation Summary Weighted average cost of capital (WACC) Equity beta 1.10 30-year risk free rate (%) 5.0 Equity risk prem ium (%) 8.5 Cost of equity (%) 14.4 Marginal cost of long-term debt (%) 6.0 Marginal tax rate (%) 19.0 Post-tax cost of debt (%) 4.9 MVE/(MVD+MVE) (%) 67.0 MVD(MVD+MVE) (%) 33.0 Weighted average cost of capital (%) 11.2 Terminal growth rate (%) 0 COSCO Pacific April 13, 2016 Source: Morgan Stanley Research estimates Exhibit 9: CPL: Forward P/E, Sep-02 to Current Exhibit 10: CPL: Forward P/B, Sep-02 to Current 25.00 3.50 25% 20.00 Mean=12.4x 3.00 2.50 Mean=1.4x 20% Forward P/E 15.00 10.00 Forward P/B 2.00 1.50 15% 10% 1.00 5.00 0.50 5% - - 0% 9/12/02 9/12/03 9/12/04 9/12/05 9/12/06 9/12/07 9/12/08 9/12/09 9/12/10 9/12/11 9/12/12 9/12/13 9/12/14 9/12/15 9/12/02 9/12/03 9/12/04 9/12/05 9/12/06 9/12/07 9/12/08 9/12/09 9/12/10 9/12/11 9/12/12 9/12/13 9/12/14 9/12/15 Forward P/E Mean +1std -1std Forward P/B Mean +1std -1std Recurring ROE Source: Bloomberg, Morgan Stanley Research Source: Bloomberg, Morgan Stanley Research 8

Exhibit 11: CPL: New vs. Old Estimates, 2016-18E COSCO Pacific April 13, 2016 New Estimation Original Estimation New Estimation Original Estimation New Estimation Original Estimation 2016E 2016E 2017E 2017E 2018E 2018E TEU TEU % Chng TEU TEU % Chng TEU TEU % Chng Pearl River Delta 21,826,082 22,230,825-2% 22,721,173 23,129,039-2% 23,379,270 23,379,270 0% COSCO-HIT 1,575,858 1,557,995 1% 1,575,858 1,557,995 1% 1,575,858 1,575,858 0% Yantian Int'l Terminals (Phase 1& II & III) 12,773,971 13,114,389-3% 13,412,670 13,770,108-3% 13,815,050 13,815,050 0% Guangzhou Nansha Phase II 4,621,226 4,834,551-4% 4,621,226 4,834,551-4% 4,621,226 4,621,226 0% Quanzhou Pacific Container Terminal - Fujian 1,307,210 1,266,548 3% 1,385,643 1,342,541 3% 1,468,782 1,468,782 0% Xiamen Yuanhai Container Terminal 1,158,923 1,038,364 12% 1,297,994 1,162,967 12% 1,427,794 1,427,794 0% Jinjiang Pacific Terminal 388,893 418,979-7% 427,782 460,876-7% 470,561 470,561 0% Yantze River Delta 10,037,753 10,527,457-5% 10,722,933 11,260,850-5% 10,722,933 10,722,933 0% Shanghai Pudong Int'l Container Terminals 2,558,283 2,493,725 3% 2,609,449 2,543,600 3% 2,609,449 2,609,449 0% Zhangjiagang Win Hanversk Container Terminals 705,910 629,034 12% 727,087 647,905 12% 727,087 727,087 0% Yangzhou Yuanyang Int'l Port 530,317 540,472-2% 578,045 589,114-2% 578,045 578,045 0% Nanjing Port Longtan Container Terminals 2,897,128 2,937,331-1% 3,157,870 3,201,690-1% 3,157,870 3,157,870 0% Yanshan Phase II na na na na na na na na na Ningbo Beilun Port Phase 4 (Berth 7) 1,274,115 1,606,255-21% 1,350,562 1,702,631-21% 1,350,562 1,350,562 0% Ningbo Beilun Port Phase 5 2,072,000 2,320,640-11% 2,299,920 2,575,910-11% 2,299,920 2,299,920 0% Bohai Rim 27,555,631 28,010,370-2% 29,242,031 29,744,273-2% 29,311,173 29,311,173 0% Qingdao Qianwan Terminal 18,015,690 17,928,365 0% 18,916,475 18,824,784 0% 18,916,475 18,916,475 0% Dalian Port Terminal (Dagaowan Phase II) 2,894,261 3,264,356-11% 3,241,573 3,656,079-11% 3,241,573 3,241,573 0% Yingkou Container Terminal 1,700,550 1,571,287 8% 1,836,594 1,696,990 8% 1,836,594 1,836,594 0% Tianjin Five Continents Int'l Terminal 2,750,149 2,887,052-5% 2,942,660 3,089,146-5% 2,942,660 2,942,660 0% Tianjin Port Euroasia Int'l Terminal 2,194,980 2,359,309-7% 2,304,729 2,477,274-7% 2,373,871 2,373,871 0% Overseas 10,604,351 10,971,132-3% 11,363,548 11,763,883-3% 11,738,286 11,738,286 0% COSCO-PSA Terminal 1,648,434 1,671,690-1% 1,730,856 1,755,275-1% 1,730,856 1,730,856 0% Antwerp Gateway 2,216,837 2,279,793-3% 2,394,184 2,462,177-3% 2,585,718 2,585,718 0% Suez Canal Container Terminal - Port Said, Egypt 3,249,488 3,516,010-8% 3,574,437 3,867,612-8% 3,574,437 3,574,437 0% Piraeus Container Terminal S.A. 3,489,592 3,503,638 0% 3,664,072 3,678,820 0% 3,847,275 3,847,275 0% Total 70,023,818 71,739,784-2% 74,049,686 75,898,045-2% 75,151,662 75,151,662 0% New Estimation Old Estimation New Estimation Old Estimation New Estimation Old Estimation Year to Dec (US$ Mn) 2016E 2016E % Chng 2017E 2017E % Chng 2018E 2018E % Chng Turnover Container leasing 79 311-75% 0 320-100% 0 0 na Income from finance lease and container mgt. 5 50-91% 0 50-100% 0 0 na Container handling, transportation and storage 13 13 0% 14 14 0% 16 16 0% Container terminal operations 1077 558 93% 1129 585 93% 1189 1189 0% Total 1173 933 26% 1144 970 18% 1205 1205 0% Operating expenses -962-726 33% -942-756 25% -978-978 0% Other income 2 2-21% 3 3-11% 3 3 0% Operating profit before finance costs 213 209 2% 205 217-6% 230 230 0% Operating profit margin (%) 18.2% 22.4% -4% 17.9% 22.4% -4% 19.1% 19.1% 0% Less: Finance costs -70-47 50% -88-47 87% -107-107 0% Segment results Container leasing 18 102-83% 0 105-100% 0 0 na Disposal gain 0 0 na 0 0 na 0 0 na Container leasing, net 18 102-83% 0 105-100% 0 0 na Dividend income from unlisted container terminals 2 2-21% 3 3-17% 3 3 0% Container terminal and related facilities 194 105 84% 202 109 86% 227 227 0% Loss from River Tade Terminal 0 0 na 0 0 na 0 0 na Disposal gain 0 0 na 0 0 na 0 0 na Container terminal and related facilities, net 196 108 82% 205 112 83% 230 230 0% Others 0 0 na 0 0 na 0 0 na Operating profit after finance cost 143 162-12% 117 170-31% 122 122 0% Depreciation and amortisation 238 252-6% 255 270-5% 273 273 0% EBITDA (include share of profits from asso. and JCEs) 415 415 0% 427 444-4% 475 475 0% Share of profit from associated companies 81 89-9% 88 97-9% 98 98 0% Shanghai Container Terminal (10%) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Shanghai Pudong Int'l Container Terminal (30%) 26 25 4% 27 26 4% 28 28 0% Chong Hing Bank (20%) 0 0 na 0 0 na 0 0 na CIMC (16.23% to 21.8% by end-07, disposed at May 2013) 0 0 na 0 0 na 0 0 na Belgium Antwerp Gateway (20%) 7 8-9% 8 9-9% 9 9 0% Dalian Port Container Terminal (20%) -3 0 nm -3 0 na -2-2 na New terminal projects 0 0 na 0 0 na 0 0 na Suez Canal Terminal (20%) 7 9-23% 8 11-22% 8 8 0% Yantian terminal (15%) 68 70-3% 73 75-3% 80 80 0% Shanghai Yixian Road & Bridge 0 0 na 0 0 na 0 0 na Share of profit from jointly controlled entities 120 117 3% 134 131 3% 148 148 0% COSCO-HIT (50%) 17 17 3% 17 17 3% 17 17 0% Qingdao Qianwan Terminal (20%) 44 43 1% 50 49 1% 61 61 0% COSCO-PSA Terminal (49%) 8 8-6% 9 10-6% 9 9 0% COSCO Logistics (49%) 0 0 na 0 0 na 0 0 na Yangzhou Yuanyang Int'l Ports (55.59%) 0 0 na 0 0 na 0 0 na Yingkou Container Terminals (50%) 1 0 nm 2 1 nm 3 3 nm Qingdao Cosport Terminal (50%) 0 0 na 0 0 na 0 0 na Nanjing Longtan (20%) 3 3-5% 4 4-4% 4 4 0% Guangzhou Nansha Port Phase II (39%) 0 0 na 0 0 na 0 0 na Ningbo Phase 4 (berth 7) (20%) 10 10 0% 9 9 0% 9 9 0% Ningbo Phase 5 (20%) 3 5-46% 6 8-32% 5 5 0% Dalian Automobile Teriminals (30%) 2 2 na 2 2 na 2 2 na Tianjin Euroasia Terminal (30%) -1 2-151% 0 2-99% 0 0 0% Profit before taxation 345 368-6% 340 397-15% 368 368 0% Profit after taxation 313 345-9% 308 373-18% 332 332 0% Net profit 299 330-9% 292 356-18% 314 314 0% Recurrent Net Profit 299 330-9% 292 356-18% 314 314 0% Source: Morgan Stanley Research (E) estimates 9

Exhibit 12: CPL: Base-case Scenario Sum-of-the-parts Valuation COSCO Pacific April 13, 2016 2016E 2016E 2016E Net Profit Valuation Valuation Methodology US$m US$m PE (x) Container terminals - HK 17.3 466.5 27.0 HK CT8 East - 50% DCF 17.3 252.3 14.6 ACT - 40% Cost of investment 214.2 Container terminals - China and overseas 189.2 3474.3 18.4 Pearl River Delta Guangzhou Nansha Phase II - 39% DCF 3.3 22.0 6.7 Yantian Phase I, II, III and West Port - 14% DCF 68.3 716.0 10.5 Quanzhou Pacific Container Terminal - 71.4% DCF 9.1 123.6 13.6 Xiamen Haicang - 70% DCF -6.2 0.0 0.0 Jinjiang Pacific Terminal - 80% DCF 1.1 5.0 4.7 Taicang Terminal Cost of investment 2.0 27.7 14.0 Yangtze River Delta WCT Phase 1-30% DCF 26.1 270.3 10.4 Zhangjiagang Terminals - 51% DCF 1.8 32.1 18.3 Yangzhou Yuanyang Int'l Port - 55.59% DCF 2.2 18.3 8.4 Nanjing Port Longtan Container Terminals - 20% DCF 3.1 38.1 12.2 Ningbo Phase 4 (berth 7) - 20% DCF 10.3 79.0 7.7 Ningbo Phase 5-20% DCF 2.8 37.4 13.3 Bohai Bay (Dayaowan Phase II) - 20% Dalian Automobile Terminal - 30% Cost of invetment na 15.0 na QQCT - 20% Dalian Port Terminal DCF DCF 45.7-2.9 1033.6-21.9 22.6 7.5 Yingkou Container Terminals - 50% DCF 1.2 10.7 9.1 Tianjin Five Continents -14% (Dividend accounting) DCF 0.7 12.4 18.3 Tianjin Port Euroasia Int'l Terminal - 30% DCF -0.8 6.5-8.4 Overseas COSCO-PSA - 49% DCF 7.5 76.8 10.2 Antwerp Gateway - 20% DCF 7.4 86.9 11.8 Suez Canal - 20% DCF 6.8 21.0 3.1 Piraeus terminal DCF 30.3 479.9 15.9 Kao Ming Terminal - 10% effective Cost of investment 0.9 8.0 9.4 Kumport SPA (25.8% effective; 40% of 64.5%) Cost of investment 376.0 Container terminals - total 206.5 3940.8 19.1 CSPD - 100% P/E 39.6 396.5 10.0 Unallocated interest income/(expense) -70.0-175.1 Unallocated corporate expenses 0.0 0.0 Sub-total 299.4 4162.1 Less: Unpaid capex on existing projects after end-2016-300.0 Total 299.4 3862.1 12.9 Total number of shares as of Dec 2016 2966.6 2966.6 Per share (HK$) 10.09 Source: Morgan Stanley Research (E) Estimates 10

Exhibit 13: Global Port Operators Valuation Comps Sheet COSCO Pacific April 13, 2016 Last px Target MS Mkt Cap Mkt Cap Share Price Perf. 52-wk CURR 4/12/16 Price Rating (LC Mn) (USD Mn) 1-mo 3-mo 12-mo High Low Ports China Merchants Holdings (International) Co. Ltd.* HKD 23.60 24.58 E 71,616 9,236 7% 10% -29% 36.80 19.80 Cosco Pacific Ltd.* HKD 9.02 10.94 E 24,458 3,154 8% 21% -12% 11.74 7.11 Xiamen International Port Co Ltd CNY 1.71 NC NC 4,580 591 10% 5% -56% 5.78 1.29 Tianjin Port Development Holdings Ltd HKD 1.20 NC NC 7,143 921 7% 4% -43% 2.77 0.99 Dalian Port PDA Co Ltd CNY 6.13 NC NC 26,906 4,159 60% 29% -12% 10.64 3.47 Shanghai International Port Group Co Ltd CNY 5.23 NC NC 121,198 18,733 3% -6% -30% 11.09 4.48 Shenzhen Chiwan Wharf Holdings Ltd CNY 16.76 NC NC 9,803 1,515 3% 14% -33% 28.00 12.10 Tianjin Port Holdings Co Ltd CNY 9.64 NC NC 16,145 2,495 10% 3% -51% 22.90 8.11 Ningbo Port Co Ltd CNY 6.50 NC NC 83,200 12,860 10% -20% 10% 13.45 5.45 Shenzhen Yan Tian Port Holdings Co Ltd N/A 6.99 NC NC 13,576 2,098 4% -7% -41% 14.98 5.74 Hutchison Port Holdings Trust* USD 0.49 0.47 E 33,097 4,268 1% -2% -28% 0.70 0.41 DP World* USD 19.01 27.00 O 15,778 15,778 5% 3% -19% 23.90 16.50 Hamburger Hafen und Logistik AG* EUR 13.29 13.00 E 931 1,062-1% 2% -34% 20.97 11.86 Santos Brasil Participacoes SA BRL 13.02 NC NC 1,734 497-9% 17% 20% 15.29 10.35 Global Ports Investments PLC* USD 3.15 5.35 E 602 602 21% -3% -44% 11.00 2.45 P/E (x) P/B (x) ROE(%) EV/EBITDA (x) Dividend Yield (%) 15 16E 17E 15 16E 17E 15 16E 17E 15 16E 17E 15 16E 17E China Merchants Holdings (International) Co. Ltd.* 15.9 13.4 12.9 1.1 1.0 1.0 7.1 7.8 7.8 10.7 9.1 8.9 3.4 4.4 4.5 Cosco Pacific Ltd.* 7.8 11.5 11.8 0.6 0.7 0.7 8.0 6.2 6.0 7.2 8.6 8.7 5.1 3.5 3.4 Xiamen International Port Co Ltd 12.3 11.3 10.6 0.8 0.7 NA 6.3 6.5 NA 3.7 3.5 NA 3.1 3.3 3.6 Tianjin Port Development Holdings Ltd 8.2 7.9 7.6 NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.9 5.2 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.2 Shanghai International Port Group Co Ltd 17.6 17.3 16.1 2.1 1.9 1.7 11.7 10.9 10.8 11.0 10.5 10.2 2.9 3.0 3.3 Shenzhen Chiwan Wharf Holdings Ltd 21.9 20.0 18.7 2.5 2.3 2.2 11.3 11.7 11.7 8.7 8.2 7.6 2.4 2.5 2.7 Tianjin Port Holdings Co Ltd 12.5 12.4 11.5 1.1 1.0 1.0 8.9 8.5 8.6 NA NA NA 2.4 2.5 2.6 Ningbo Port Co Ltd 27.7 30.2 29.1 2.5 2.4 2.3 9.2 7.9 7.7 NA NA NA 1.2 1.1 1.4 Shenzhen Yan Tian Port Holdings Co Ltd 31.5 NA NA 2.4 NA NA 7.5 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Chinese Median 15.9 12.9 12.4 1.6 1.0 1.4 8.5 7.9 8.2 8.0 8.4 8.7 3.0 3.2 3.4 Hutchison Port Holdings Trust* 20.5 20.4 19.7 0.8 0.8 0.8 3.9 3.8 4.1 10.6 10.6 10.2 8.4 8.3 8.5 DP World* 19.1 16.5 14.4 1.9 1.7 1.5 10.4 10.9 11.6 12.2 10.3 9.5 1.5 1.7 2.0 Hamburger Hafen und Logistik AG* 17.3 16.7 14.3 1.9 1.8 1.7 11.7 10.9 12.4 6.4 5.8 5.3 3.7 3.9 3.9 Santos Brasil Participacoes SA 36.5 28.8 17.7 1.2 1.2 1.1 3.2 4.1 6.6 7.3 7.7 7.9 3.9 2.1 3.5 Global Ports Investments PLC* 4.5 5.6 3.5 1.3 1.1 0.8 37.7 23.3 30.6 5.6 5.6 4.0 0.0 0.0 5.8 Foreign Median 19.1 16.7 14.4 1.3 1.2 1.1 10.4 10.9 11.6 7.3 7.7 7.9 3.7 2.1 3.9 Mixed Median 17.6 16.6 14.3 1.6 1.2 1.3 9.0 8.5 9.7 8.0 8.4 8.7 3.0 2.7 3.4 * indicates covered companies Source: E = Morgan Stanley Research estimates. NA = Not available. Source: Thomson Reuters, Morgan Stanley Research. 11

Disclosure Section The information and opinions in Morgan Stanley Research were prepared or are disseminated by Morgan Stanley Asia Limited (which accepts the responsibility for its contents) and/or Morgan Stanley Asia (Singapore) Pte. (Registration number 199206298Z) and/or Morgan Stanley Asia (Singapore) Securities Pte Ltd (Registration number 200008434H), regulated by the Monetary Authority of Singapore (which accepts legal responsibility for its contents and should be contacted with respect to any matters arising from, or in connection with, Morgan Stanley Research), and/or Morgan Stanley Taiwan Limited and/or Morgan Stanley & Co International plc, Seoul Branch, and/or Morgan Stanley Australia Limited (A.B.N. 67 003 734 576, holder of Australian financial services license No. 233742, which accepts responsibility for its contents), and/or Morgan Stanley Wealth Management Australia Pty Ltd (A.B.N. 19 009 145 555, holder of Australian financial services license No. 240813, which accepts responsibility for its contents), and/or Morgan Stanley India Company Private Limited, regulated by the Securities and Exchange Board of India ( SEBI ) and holder of licenses as a Research Analyst (SEBI Registration No. INH000001105); Stock Broker (BSE Registration No. INB011054237 and NSE Registration No. INB/INF231054231), Merchant Banker (SEBI Registration No. INM000011203), and depository participant with National Securities Depository Limited (SEBI Registration No. IN-DP-NSDL-372-2014) which accepts the responsibility for its contents and should be contacted with respect to any matters arising from, or in connection with, Morgan Stanley Research, and/or PT Morgan Stanley Asia Indonesia and their affiliates (collectively, "Morgan Stanley"). For important disclosures, stock price charts and equity rating histories regarding companies that are the subject of this report, please see the Morgan Stanley Research Disclosure Website at www.morganstanley.com/researchdisclosures, or contact your investment representative or Morgan Stanley Research at 1585 Broadway, (Attention: Research Management), New York, NY, 10036 USA. For valuation methodology and risks associated with any price targets referenced in this research report, please contact the Client Support Team as follows: US/Canada +1 800 303-2495; Hong Kong +852 2848-5999; Latin America +1 718 754-5444 (U.S.); London +44 (0)20-7425-8169; Singapore +65 6834-6860; Sydney +61 (0)2-9770-1505; Tokyo +81 (0)3-6836-9000. Alternatively you may contact your investment representative or Morgan Stanley Research at 1585 Broadway, (Attention: Research Management), New York, NY 10036 USA. Analyst Certification The following analysts hereby certify that their views about the companies and their securities discussed in this report are accurately expressed and that they have not received and will not receive direct or indirect compensation in exchange for expressing specific recommendations or views in this report: Qianlei Fan, CFA; Watson Lau; Edward H Xu, CFA. Unless otherwise stated, the individuals listed on the cover page of this report are research analysts. Global Research Conflict Management Policy Morgan Stanley Research has been published in accordance with our conflict management policy, which is available at www.morganstanley.com/institutional/research/conflictpolicies. Important US Regulatory Disclosures on Subject Companies As of March 31, 2016, Morgan Stanley beneficially owned 1% or more of a class of common equity securities of the following companies covered in Morgan Stanley Research: Hopewell Highway Infrastructure, Jiangsu Expressway Company Limited, Shanghai International Airport, Shenzhen International Holdings. Within the last 12 months, Morgan Stanley managed or co-managed a public offering (or 144A offering) of securities of Sinotrans Limited. Within the last 12 months, Morgan Stanley has received compensation for investment banking services from Sinotrans Limited. In the next 3 months, Morgan Stanley expects to receive or intends to seek compensation for investment banking services from Air China Limited, Beijing Capital Int'l Airport, Cathay Pacific Airways, China Eastern Airlines, China Merchants Hldg Intl, China Southern Airlines, CIMC, COSCO Pacific, Hutchison Port Holdings Trust, Kerry Logistics Network, Orient Overseas Int'l Limited, Pacific Basin Shipping, Shenzhen International Holdings, Sinotrans Limited, SITC International Holdings Company, TravelSky Technology. Within the last 12 months, Morgan Stanley has received compensation for products and services other than investment banking services from Orient Overseas Int'l Limited. Within the last 12 months, Morgan Stanley has provided or is providing investment banking services to, or has an investment banking client relationship with, the following company: Air China Limited, Beijing Capital Int'l Airport, Cathay Pacific Airways, China Eastern Airlines, China Merchants Hldg Intl, China Southern Airlines, CIMC, COSCO Pacific, Hutchison Port Holdings Trust, Kerry Logistics Network, Orient Overseas Int'l Limited, Pacific Basin Shipping, Shenzhen International Holdings, Sinotrans Limited, SITC International Holdings Company, TravelSky Technology. Within the last 12 months, Morgan Stanley has either provided or is providing non-investment banking, securities-related services to and/or in the past has entered into an agreement to provide services or has a client relationship with the following company: Air China Limited, Cathay Pacific Airways, Orient Overseas Int'l Limited, Pacific Basin Shipping. Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC makes a market in the securities of China Eastern Airlines, China Southern Airlines. The equity research analysts or strategists principally responsible for the preparation of Morgan Stanley Research have received compensation based upon various factors, including quality of research, investor client feedback, stock picking, competitive factors, firm revenues and overall investment banking revenues. Morgan Stanley and its affiliates do business that relates to companies/instruments covered in Morgan Stanley Research, including market making, providing liquidity, fund management, commercial banking, extension of credit, investment services and investment banking. Morgan Stanley sells to and buys from customers the securities/instruments of companies covered in Morgan Stanley Research on a principal basis. Morgan Stanley may have a position in the debt of the Company or instruments discussed in this report. Certain disclosures listed above are also for compliance with applicable regulations in non-us jurisdictions. STOCK RATINGS Morgan Stanley uses a relative rating system using terms such as Overweight, Equal-weight, Not-Rated or Underweight (see definitions below). Morgan Stanley does not assign ratings of Buy, Hold or Sell to the stocks we cover. Overweight, Equal-weight, Not-Rated and Underweight are not the equivalent of buy, hold and sell. Investors should carefully read the definitions of all ratings used in Morgan Stanley Research. In addition, since Morgan Stanley Research contains more complete information concerning the analyst's views, investors should carefully read Morgan Stanley Research, in its entirety, and not infer the contents from the rating alone. In any case, ratings (or research) should not be used or relied upon as investment advice. An investor's decision to buy or sell a stock should depend on individual circumstances (such as the investor's existing holdings) and other considerations. Global Stock Ratings Distribution (as of March 31, 2016) For disclosure purposes only (in accordance with NASD and NYSE requirements), we include the category headings of Buy, Hold, and Sell alongside our ratings of Overweight, Equal-weight, Not-Rated and Underweight. Morgan Stanley does not assign ratings of Buy, Hold or Sell to the stocks we cover. Overweight, Equal-weight, Not-Rated and Underweight are not the equivalent of buy, hold, and sell but represent recommended relative weightings (see definitions below). To satisfy regulatory requirements, we correspond Overweight, our most positive stock rating, with a buy recommendation; we correspond Equal-weight and Not-Rated to hold and Underweight to sell recommendations, respectively. 12

COVERAGE UNIVERSE INVESTMENT BANKING CLIENTS (IBC) STOCK RATING CATEGORY COUNT % OF TOTAL COUNT % OF TOTAL IBC % OF RATING CATEGORY Overweight/Buy 1219 36% 305 41% 25% Equal-weight/Hold 1405 41% 333 45% 24% Not-Rated/Hold 81 2% 5 1% 6% Underweight/Sell 691 20% 95 13% 14% TOTAL 3,396 738 Data include common stock and ADRs currently assigned ratings. Investment Banking Clients are companies from whom Morgan Stanley received investment banking compensation in the last 12 months. Analyst Stock Ratings Overweight (O). The stock's total return is expected to exceed the average total return of the analyst's industry (or industry team's) coverage universe, on a risk-adjusted basis, over the next 12-18 months. Equal-weight (E). The stock's total return is expected to be in line with the average total return of the analyst's industry (or industry team's) coverage universe, on a risk-adjusted basis, over the next 12-18 months. Not-Rated (NR). Currently the analyst does not have adequate conviction about the stock's total return relative to the average total return of the analyst's industry (or industry team's) coverage universe, on a risk-adjusted basis, over the next 12-18 months. Underweight (U). The stock's total return is expected to be below the average total return of the analyst's industry (or industry team's) coverage universe, on a risk-adjusted basis, over the next 12-18 months. Unless otherwise specified, the time frame for price targets included in Morgan Stanley Research is 12 to 18 months. Analyst Industry Views Attractive (A): The analyst expects the performance of his or her industry coverage universe over the next 12-18 months to be attractive vs. the relevant broad market benchmark, as indicated below. In-Line (I): The analyst expects the performance of his or her industry coverage universe over the next 12-18 months to be in line with the relevant broad market benchmark, as indicated below. Cautious (C): The analyst views the performance of his or her industry coverage universe over the next 12-18 months with caution vs. the relevant broad market benchmark, as indicated below. Benchmarks for each region are as follows: North America - S&P 500; Latin America - relevant MSCI country index or MSCI Latin America Index; Europe - MSCI Europe; Japan - TOPIX; Asia - relevant MSCI country index or MSCI sub-regional index or MSCI AC Asia Pacific ex Japan Index. Stock Price, Price Target and Rating History (See Rating Definitions) Important Disclosures for Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC Customers 13

Important disclosures regarding the relationship between the companies that are the subject of Morgan Stanley Research and Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC or Morgan Stanley or any of their affiliates, are available on the Morgan Stanley Wealth Management disclosure website at www.morganstanley.com/online/researchdisclosures. For Morgan Stanley specific disclosures, you may refer to www.morganstanley.com/researchdisclosures. Each Morgan Stanley Equity Research report is reviewed and approved on behalf of Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC. This review and approval is conducted by the same person who reviews the Equity Research report on behalf of Morgan Stanley. This could create a conflict of interest. Other Important Disclosures Morgan Stanley & Co. International PLC and its affiliates have a significant financial interest in the debt securities of Pacific Basin Shipping. Morgan Stanley is not acting as a municipal advisor and the opinions or views contained herein are not intended to be, and do not constitute, advice within the meaning of Section 975 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. Morgan Stanley produces an equity research product called a "Tactical Idea." Views contained in a "Tactical Idea" on a particular stock may be contrary to the recommendations or views expressed in research on the same stock. This may be the result of differing time horizons, methodologies, market events, or other factors. For all research available on a particular stock, please contact your sales representative or go to Matrix at http://www.morganstanley.com/matrix. Morgan Stanley Research is provided to our clients through our proprietary research portal on Matrix and also distributed electronically by Morgan Stanley to clients. Certain, but not all, Morgan Stanley Research products are also made available to clients through third-party vendors or redistributed to clients through alternate electronic means as a convenience. For access to all available Morgan Stanley Research, please contact your sales representative or go to Matrix at http://www.morganstanley.com/matrix. Any access and/or use of Morgan Stanley Research is subject to Morgan Stanley's Terms of Use (http://www.morganstanley.com/terms.html). By accessing and/or using Morgan Stanley Research, you are indicating that you have read and agree to be bound by our Terms of Use (http://www.morganstanley.com/terms.html). In addition you consent to Morgan Stanley processing your personal data and using cookies in accordance with our Privacy Policy and our Global Cookies Policy (http://www.morganstanley.com/privacy_pledge.html), including for the purposes of setting your preferences and to collect readership data so that we can deliver better and more personalized service and products to you. To find out more information about how Morgan Stanley processes personal data, how we use cookies and how to reject cookies see our Privacy Policy and our Global Cookies Policy (http://www.morganstanley.com/privacy_pledge.html). If you do not agree to our Terms of Use and/or if you do not wish to provide your consent to Morgan Stanley processing your personal data or using cookies please do not access our research. Morgan Stanley Research does not provide individually tailored investment advice. Morgan Stanley Research has been prepared without regard to the circumstances and objectives of those who receive it. Morgan Stanley recommends that investors independently evaluate particular investments and strategies, and encourages investors to seek the advice of a financial adviser. The appropriateness of an investment or strategy will depend on an investor's circumstances and objectives. The securities, instruments, or strategies discussed in Morgan Stanley Research may not be suitable for all investors, and certain investors may not be eligible to purchase or participate in some or all of them. Morgan Stanley Research is not an offer to buy or sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy or sell any security/instrument or to participate in any particular trading strategy. The value of and income from your investments may vary because of changes in interest rates, foreign exchange rates, default rates, prepayment rates, securities/instruments prices, market indexes, operational or financial conditions of companies or other factors. There may be time limitations on the exercise of options or other rights in securities/instruments transactions. Past performance is not necessarily a guide to future performance. Estimates of future performance are based on assumptions that may not be realized. If provided, and unless otherwise stated, the closing price on the cover page is that of the primary exchange for the subject company's securities/instruments. The fixed income research analysts, strategists or economists principally responsible for the preparation of Morgan Stanley Research have received compensation based upon various factors, including quality, accuracy and value of research, firm profitability or revenues (which include fixed income trading and capital markets profitability or revenues), client feedback and competitive factors. Fixed Income Research analysts', strategists' or economists' compensation is not linked to investment banking or capital markets transactions performed by Morgan Stanley or the profitability or revenues of particular trading desks. The "Important US Regulatory Disclosures on Subject Companies" section in Morgan Stanley Research lists all companies mentioned where Morgan Stanley owns 1% or more of a class of common equity securities of the companies. For all other companies mentioned in Morgan Stanley Research, Morgan Stanley may have an investment of less than 1% in securities/instruments or derivatives of securities/instruments of companies and may trade them in ways different from those discussed in Morgan Stanley Research. Employees of Morgan Stanley not involved in the preparation of Morgan Stanley Research may have investments in securities/instruments or derivatives of securities/instruments of companies mentioned and may trade them in ways different from those discussed in Morgan Stanley Research. Derivatives may be issued by Morgan Stanley or associated persons. With the exception of information regarding Morgan Stanley, Morgan Stanley Research is based on public information. Morgan Stanley makes every effort to use reliable, comprehensive information, but we make no representation that it is accurate or complete. We have no obligation to tell you when opinions or information in Morgan Stanley Research change apart from when we intend to discontinue equity research coverage of a subject company. Facts and views presented in Morgan Stanley Research have not been reviewed by, and may not reflect information known to, professionals in other Morgan Stanley business areas, including investment banking personnel. Morgan Stanley Research personnel may participate in company events such as site visits and are generally prohibited from accepting payment by the company of associated expenses unless pre-approved by authorized members of Research management. Morgan Stanley may make investment decisions that are inconsistent with the recommendations or views in this report. To our readers in Taiwan: Information on securities/instruments that trade in Taiwan is distributed by Morgan Stanley Taiwan Limited ("MSTL"). Such information is for your reference only. The reader should independently evaluate the investment risks and is solely responsible for their investment decisions. Morgan Stanley Research may not be distributed to the public media or quoted or used by the public media without the express written consent of Morgan Stanley. Information on securities/instruments that do not trade in Taiwan is for informational purposes only and is not to be construed as a recommendation or a solicitation to trade in such securities/instruments. MSTL may not execute transactions for clients in these securities/instruments. To our readers in Hong Kong: Information is distributed in Hong Kong by and on behalf of, and is attributable to, Morgan Stanley Asia Limited as part of its regulated activities in Hong Kong. If you have any queries concerning Morgan Stanley Research, please contact our Hong Kong sales representatives. Certain information in Morgan Stanley Research was sourced by employees of the Shanghai Representative Office of Morgan Stanley Asia Limited for the use of Morgan Stanley Asia Limited. Morgan Stanley is not incorporated under PRC law and the research in relation to this report is conducted outside the PRC. Morgan Stanley Research does not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy any securities in the PRC. PRC investors shall have the relevant qualifications to invest in such securities and shall be responsible for obtaining all relevant approvals, licenses, verifications and/or registrations from the relevant governmental authorities themselves. Morgan Stanley Research is disseminated in Brazil by Morgan Stanley C.T.V.M. S.A.; in Mexico by Morgan Stanley México, Casa de Bolsa, S.A. de C.V which is regulated by Comision Nacional Bancaria y de Valores. Paseo de los Tamarindos 90, Torre 1, Col. Bosques de las Lomas Floor 29, 05120 Mexico City; in Japan by Morgan Stanley MUFG Securities Co., Ltd. and, for Commodities related research reports only, Morgan Stanley Capital Group Japan Co., Ltd; in Hong Kong by Morgan Stanley Asia Limited (which accepts responsibility for its contents) and by Bank Morgan Stanley AG, Hong Kong Branch; in Singapore by Morgan Stanley Asia (Singapore) Pte. (Registration number 199206298Z) and/or Morgan Stanley Asia (Singapore) Securities Pte Ltd (Registration number 200008434H), regulated by the Monetary Authority of Singapore (which accepts legal responsibility for its contents and should be contacted with respect to any matters arising from, or in connection with, Morgan Stanley Research) and by Bank Morgan Stanley AG, Singapore Branch (Registration number T11FC0207F); in Australia to "wholesale clients" within the meaning of the Australian Corporations Act by Morgan Stanley Australia Limited A.B.N. 67 003 734 576, holder of Australian financial services license No. 233742, which accepts responsibility for its contents; in Australia to 14