Update: EU VAT on E-Commerce

Similar documents
Changes to Hedge Fund Disclosure and Reporting Obligations

Up We Go Again Financial Threshold Increases Effective 1 July 2016

Investment Advisers and Funds New Treasury Report Form for Foreign Claims and Liabilities

IRS Moves Forward with Plan to Change the Determination Letter Process

Introducing the New Multi-Level Marketing Governing Act

SEC Issues Risk Alert on Custody Rule, Reinforcing Its Message to Registered Investment Advisers in Its Examination Priorities for 2013

Cross-Border European Insolvency in the Brexit Era

CAMAC's Report on Equity Crowdfunding: Does it Pave the Way to Bridge the Capital Gap for Start- Ups and Small Scale Enterprises in Australia?

Treasury Consultation Paper Another Step Towards Crowd-Sourced Equity Funding

HIPAA s New Rules: Expanding Scope, Clarifying Uncertainties, and Reinforcing Fundamentals

SEC Delays Municipal Advisor Registration and Record-Keeping Obligations

Joining the Crowd: SEC Adopts Final Crowdfunding Regulations - Part I

Pennsylvania Treasury Issues Guidance Document Interpreting 2016 Amendments to the Pennsylvania Unclaimed Property Law

Importance of the amendment to the Public Procurement Law for the expenditure of EU funds

Better Late Than Never? The CFTC and the NFA Publish FAQs on CPO and CTA Reporting Forms

ISDA 2013 EMIR NFC Representation Protocol: Factors to consider in deciding whether to adhere

Appeals Court Strikes Down Labor Department s Interpretation Regarding Exempt Status of Mortgage Loan Officers

ERISA Fiduciary Issues for Plan Sponsors: What Do 401(k) Plan Fiduciaries Need to Know About Revenue Sharing?

Amendment to Taiwan s Company Act Establishes 'Closely-Held Company Limited by Shares' to Provide Flexibility on Fund-Raising for Start-ups

SEC Issues Preliminary Denial Notices for Two Nontransparent Actively Managed ETF Applications

SEC Adopts Payment Disclosure Rules for Resource Extraction Issuers

Australian Insolvency Reforms Is the Harbour Safe Yet?

Sapin II - France s War on Corruption

SEC Proposes New Limits on Funds Use of Derivatives

Take Notice of This Change: Supreme Court Adopts Recommended Amendments to Bankruptcy Notice of Payment Change Rule

CFTC Expands Interest Rate Swap Clearing Requirements

Iranian Nuclear Accord Reached, But Specific Implementation of Meaningful Sanctions Relief Will Not Be Immediate

Investment Management Alert. New Interactive Data XBRL Filing Requirements for Mutual Funds

Introduction to the Commercial End-User Exception to Mandatory Clearing of Swaps and Security-Based Swaps Under Title VII of the Dodd-Frank Act

The Extra-territorial Impact of EMIR on Non-EU Swap Counterparties

Special Resolution Regimes and the ISDA Resolution Stay Jurisdictional Modular Protocol

The Sun is Setting On Myanmar s Sanctions Regime

How Secure Is Your Pennsylvania Real Property Tax Exemption?

FINRA s Most Significant 2016 Enforcement Actions

Fiscal Cliff II: What s Next For Tax Reform? Out of the Frying Pan, Into the Fire

Tax Alert. China Issues New Tax Rules on Corporate Restructurings. I. Overview

Introduction to the U.S. Regulation of Cross-Border Transactions Involving Swaps and Security-Based Swaps

Investment Management Alert

K&L Gates A Guide to Establishing a Business Presence in Dubai

Mobile Check Deposits: With Soaring Use, Increasing Risks

Section 363 Sale Order Enjoining Successor Liability Claims Not Subject to Subsequent Attack by State Agencies

Corporate Alert. New Amendment to NYSE Rule 452 Limits Discretionary Broker Voting in Director Elections. What is NYSE Rule 452?

Swap Clearing and the Commercial End- User Exception: Corporate Governance and Risk Management Issues for Commercial Companies

Back to the Drawing Board: Regulatory Agencies Re-Propose Risk-Retention Rules for Securitizations

Will the Safe Harbour Ipso Facto Assist with Restructuring in Australia? Proposed Reform to Australian Insolvency Laws

An Excerpt From: K&L Gates Global Government Solutions 2012: Annual Outlook

Congress Turns Tax World Upside Down with New Focus on Corporate Inversions

Securities Law Considerations in Online and

Investment Management and Public Policy Alert

Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) Alert

Law Amendment and the FCPA Best Practices for Responding to a Chinese Government Commercial Bribery Investigation

Earthquakes: Are You Covered, and If Not, Should You Be?

The Financial CHOICE Act; Dodd-Frank Reform (Not Repeal)

EU and UK Sanctions Update: July 2016

What Are Your Company's New Disclosure Obligations in China? Potential Anti-Corruption Compliance Implications

Investment Management Alert. Dubai: Growing Pains for Islamic Investments?

FINRA Targets AML Programs and Culture of Compliance as 2016 Enforcement Priority, Particularly for High-Risk Broker/Dealers

K&L Gates Global Government Solutions

Joining the Crowd: SEC Adopts Final Crowdfunding Regulations - Part III - Intermediaries

Evolution of FATCA: How We Got Here and Where Are We Going?

The Affordable Care Act After King v. Burwell: With Chaos Avoided in the Near Term, What Does the Future Hold For Health Reform?

Summary of Government Response to Franchising Code Changes. 1 Disclosure on notice of intention to renew Accepted in principle

THE TRANSFORMATION OF INVESTMENT ADVICE: DIGITAL ADVISERS AS FIDUCIARIES

MiFID II 18 January MiFID II

Global. Real Estate Outlook. Jeremy Kelly Global Research. David Green-Morgan Global Capital Markets Research

Insurance Coverage Alert

May Global Growth Strategy

IMPORTANT INFORMATION

MiFID II 31 December MiFID II. Third country access

Payment Services Directive II: Unravelling the Mystery 7 March 2017

Global Real Estate Outlook

What Chinese Businesses Need to Know About Establishing an R&D Center in the United States

A Guaranty Is Only As Good As The Person Who Signs It: 1 Enforcing Commercial Lending Guaranties In Massachusetts

Derivatives and Structured Products Alert

MiFID II 31 December MiFID II

Supplemental Information Fourth Quarter 2011 Earnings Call

(Non-legislative acts) REGULATIONS

Patterns of Global Capital Flow

Economic and Political Environment in Ukraine and Russia

MiFID II 31 December MiFID II

Is Money Being Laundered Through Your Financial Institution Using Daily Fantasy Sports Sites?

ACA Repeal and Replace Effort Advances with House GOP s Passage of the American Health Care Act

Foreign Corrupt Practices Act/Anti-Corruption FCPA Charges Relating to Gift-Giving in China

HKMA reboots virtual banking. February 2018

IP ISSUES IN MERGERS & ACQUISITIONS

NAVIGATING US TAX REFORM:

MiFID II 31 December MiFID II. Information to clients on costs and charges

Latham & Watkins Corporate Department

EMPLOYMENT & COMPLIANCE ISSUES & PITFALLS IN CROSS- BORDER M&A TRANSACTIONS

Supplemental Information Second-Quarter 2013 Earnings Call

SEC PROPOSED STANDARDS OF CONDUCT. FOR RETAIL ADVICE Chris Cox Jennifer Klass Steven Stone Brian Baltz May 9, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP

Contents. Introduction 4. Directors conflicts duties 4. What is a conflict? 5. Who can authorise? 6. Authorising conflicts 7

Every cent counts: China slashes certain IP application fees. April 2017

M&A ACADEMY: TAX ISSUES IN M&A TRANSACTIONS

Good Oil Conference 2015 Shareholder activism. Clare Pope and Simon Rear

Payment Services Academy

Directors duties under the Companies Act An introduction

TAX ISSUES IN M&A TRANSACTIONS

UNDERSTANDING CLOSED- END INTERVAL FUNDS Sean Graber, Partner Thomas S. Harman, Partner David W. Freese, Associate. June 7, 2017

Client Alert. IRS Releases Final FATCA Regulations. Summary. Background

Transcription:

March 3, 2014 Practice Group(s): Tax Update: EU VAT on E-Commerce By Valentina Farle, LL.M. and Rainer Schmitt Changes to EU VAT on E-Services as of 1 January 2015 What are E-Services? There are a great variety of electronically provided services ( e-services ) and the respective market is rapidly growing. The general definition is that e-services are services which are delivered over the Internet or an electronic network and which, due to the specific nature and features of the supply, are highly dependent on information technology ( IT ); the supply of e-services is essentially automated, involves only minimal human involvement and is impossible to be rendered without IT. Examples for e-services include inter alia website hosting; automated, online and distance maintenance of programs; online data warehousing; access to data bases; access or download of software, updates, images, digitized content of books and electronic publications; music; online market services functioning in accordance with automated procedures; workbooks completed online and marked automatically and other comparable network-based automated distance teaching; access to automated online games with network connected players; etc. 2008 Changes Effective 2015 As of 1 January 2015, European Union ( EU ) value added tax ( VAT ) rules regarding e-services will change for supplies made by EU suppliers to EU consumers ( B2C ). The respective changes to the EU VAT law were already enacted in 2008, but will only take effect as from 1 January 2015 onwards. Current Regime for EU Suppliers Under currently applicable EU VAT law, the place of such B2C supplies of e-services by EU suppliers is at the VAT-relevant location of the respective EU supplier. In effect, each EU supplier has to file only one VAT return with one single applicable VAT rate in the supplier s EU member state for all his B2C e-services rendered into the EU. Taking advantage of the considerable differences in VAT rates throughout the EU, B2C e- service providers are now headquartered in EU member states with (relatively) low VAT rates, typically in Luxembourg. Current Regime for non-eu Suppliers In contrast, non-eu suppliers rendering B2C e-services to EU customers so far have to subject their respective supplies to VAT applicable in the respective customer s EU member state. As a consequence, these non-eu suppliers of e-services B2C are currently confronted with up to 28 member states with differing VAT rates and differing VAT laws. The so-called VAT mini one-stop shop ( MOSS ) procedure provides for a limited relief from the respective administrative burden. The MOSS procedure was

established for non-eu suppliers of B2C e-services to EU customers, allowing them to file a single VAT declaration and make respective VAT payments in only one EU member state which EU member state then forwards the respective declarations and VAT payments to the other relevant EU member states concerned. The MOSS procedure therefore provides a single portal for the filing of the VAT declarations and the making of VAT payments, but it does not relieve the burden for the supplier of the accounting for VAT, who has to take into account up to 28 EU member states VAT rates and VAT laws. Due to these disadvantages, many non-eu suppliers of e-services established themselves within a suitable EU member state in order to benefit from the regime governing EU suppliers. New Single Regime from 2015 onwards As of 1 January 2015, the rules currently governing B2C e-services by non-eu suppliers to EU customers will practically extend to EU suppliers. The changes coming into effect on 1 January 2015 will result in the place of supply of all e-services always being the VAT-relevant location of the respective customer irrespective of the VAT classification and location of the supplier and the customer; this already applies to e-services rendered to VATable customers, namely businesses, ( B2B ). If the customer is VATable (B2B) and located in the EU, the reverse charge procedure will apply and the customer will have to account for the VAT, not the supplier. If the customer is not VATable (B2C), the supplier has to account for the VAT in the customer s VAT-relevant EU member state, but may potentially benefit from the MOSS procedure. Further EU Change Preparation Measures The EU is currently preparing the new regime applicable as of 1 January 2015 with several implementing and accompanying measures. The EU Council enacted Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1042/2013 on 7 October 2013, which is directly applicable in the EU member states and is intended to deal with some of the mostpressing practical issues regarding the EU VAT treatment of e-services. The European Commission also published (nonbinding) comments on the MOSS procedure (Guide to the VAT Mini One Stop Shop, dated 23 October 2013), explaining some of the procedural aspects of the changes as of 1 January 2015. For March/April 2014, further explanatory notes on the determination of the place of supply for e-services are expected to be issued by the European Commission. Suppliers should carefully monitor and prepare for the new regime in view of such preparation measures of the EU, as well as taking into account further measures expected to be taken by EU member states. Challenges for E-Services Suppliers One of the main challenges for e-services suppliers from 2015 onwards is that in order to properly account for their EU VAT charges and comply with the EU VAT obligations relating to their e-services, they actually have to determine the relevant VAT features of each of their customers. This means that they have to determine (1) whether the recipient is a VATable customer (B2B) or not (B2C), and (2) where the customer as supply recipient is located for EU VAT purposes in order to determine the place of the supply, and therefore, the place where the supply is VATable. It will be necessary for the supplier to document the respective findings as to the recipient s VAT status and VATrelevant location in order to reproduce them in subsequent VAT audits. 2

Furthermore, they have to determine the VAT rules and obligations potentially applicable to their e-services in the respective EU member state of that supply, being the customer s VAT-relevant location, including, for example, provisions on proper invoicing. The MOSS procedure may cover the filing of VAT declarations and the making of VAT payments in the single EU member state of the supplier s MOSS identification, if the supplier elects the application of the MOSS procedure and is eligible to do so. In the case of different potential MOSS identification EU member states, the supplier should evaluate these options in view of procedural details, language and other relevant features. With respect to aspects not covered by the MOSS procedure, there is no single gateway for all EU member states involved. In order to gain and retain respective information and documentation on the VAT features of the supply and to collect and organize the information necessary for compliance with VAT obligations as well as implementing the VAT requirements regarding the supply itself, the ordering and billing procedures have to be amended and the respective IT environment needs to be adjusted. In preparing for the 2015 changes, suppliers have to address inter alia consumer and data protection requirements and restrictions. Suppliers should check and potentially reshape and restructure supply chains and respective contractual arrangements as well as billing, payment and other aspects of the provision of such supplies. Further consequences of the changes effective 1 January 2015 may, amongst others, also include the rethinking of the broader business set-up, which was established in view of certain applicable VAT rules. Business operations established in low-vat-rate countries may be considered to be relocated to lower-cost countries. It could be advantageous for suppliers to seek the services of third-parties acting as intermediaries for e-services in order to avoid the additional burden arising from B2C supplies as of 1 January 2015. Moreover, in view of the upcoming changes, it should be checked whether these may affect e-services agreed on, paid for or rendered before the end of 2014, if these also relate to the period beginning 2015 onwards. Details of Determination of Recipient s VAT Status For the classification and documentation of the supply recipient s VAT status, it will be essential to request the customer to declare whether the order of e-services is made acting as a VATable person (B2B) or not (B2C). As long as the customer of the supply has not provided to the e-services supplier such customer s individual VAT identification number with respect to the order, the supplier should assume that the supply is B2C, resulting in the supplier being liable for any respective EU VAT. It appears that if the customer subsequently provides the VAT identification number to the supplier or withdraws a communicated VAT identification number, the supplier has to change the respective VAT declarations resulting in a correction of the VAT charges, but details of such adjustment remain unclear at this stage. Furthermore, suppliers should check any communicated VAT identification number as valid and applicable as well as document their measures taken in order to identify and verify the VAT status of the customer with respect to the supply. 3

Details of Determination of Recipient s VAT Location Regarding the customer s VAT-relevant location that is decisive for the place of the supply, further determinations are necessary and respective information must be gathered and stored: Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1042/2013 of 7 October 2013 contains inter alia several presumptions for the VAT-relevant place of supply which shall assist the supplier of e-services in making the respective determinations for the VAT treatment of the supply. In the case of B2C supplies, the general rule is that the supply is VATable where the customer is established, has his permanent address or usually resides. According to Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1042/2013 of 7 October 2013, in the case of e-services supplied at a certain location, such as a wi-fi hot spot, telephone box or kiosk, an Internet café, a restaurant or hotel lobby where the physical presence of the recipient of the supply at that location is needed for the service to be provided, it shall be presumed that the customer is established, has his permanent address or usually resides at the place of that location and that the service is effectively used and enjoyed there. Furthermore, regarding B2C supplies, if received through a fixed line, these shall be presumed to be rendered at the place of installation of such fixed line, if received through a mobile network, the VAT place of supply shall be presumed to be the country identified by the mobile country code of the respective SIM card, and if received through a decoder or similar device at the location thereof. The presumptions are under certain conditions rebuttable, both by the supplier as well as by the tax authorities. For rebutting the presumptions and determining the place of supply if no presumption is applicable, rules are provided regarding the collection of a certain number of so-called non-contradictory items of evidence, such as the billing address of the consumer, the IP address of the device used, the bank details of the bank account used for payment, the consumer s mobile country code of the respective SIM card used, the location of the consumer s fixed land line or other commercially relevant information. Details of Determination of Supplier Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1042/2013 of 7 October 2013 also contains provisions as to the determination of the relevant supplier of e-services in certain circumstances, namely where e-services are supplied through a telecommunications network, interface or portal such as a marketplace for applications, which should be carefully analyzed by respective suppliers in each individual case. In certain cases, it will be decisive whether there is a clear indication of the relevant supplier, which is furthermore appropriately reflected in the respective contractual arrangements between all parties involved and in all respective invoices. Existing arrangements including respective order, billing and payment features should be reviewed in order to assess whether these and the respective VAT treatment applied so far are in line with the new provisions and determine whether changes are required. 4

Details of Applicability of New Rules In some cases, it may be difficult to determine whether the old or the new rules are applicable to a certain e-service. This may particularly be the case if the e-service is rendered for a period of time starting before 1 January 2015 and ending thereafter, if the customer makes prepayments, if billing in stages or in periods is agreed on, if the e- services are contracted before 2015, but rendered only in 2015 or thereafter. The respective rules of the Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1042/2013 of 7 October 2013 need to be carefully analyzed in order to determine the applicability of the old or the new rules to a particular e-service. Further clarification may be provided by the announced further explanatory notes by the European Commission expected for March/April 2014, even though these are not binding on the EU member states. Reduced VAT Rates for E-Books in the EU? The provision of e-books is classified for VAT purposes within the EU as an e-service. Under EU VAT law, e-services shall be subject to the unreduced, standard VAT rates of the EU member states. Under their national VAT laws, some EU member states apply reduced VAT rates to e-books. Under currently applicable EU VAT law, the place of supply for e-books by an EU supplier to a consumer (B2C) is the EU member state where the supplier is based for VAT purposes. In combination, the reduced VAT rates on e-books in some EU member states and the rule for the place of supply of e-books by EU suppliers have both led to a concentration of e-book suppliers within the EU in such EU member states. The European Commission initiated respective infringement procedures against France and Luxembourg for their reduced VAT rates on e-books. While the European Commission is currently taking France and Luxembourg to the European Court of Justice over their reduced VAT rates for e-books, the German coalition government has put the introduction of reduced VAT rates for e-books in the EU on the agenda: in a press release dated 27 January 2014, Ms. Monika Grütters, German state minister for Culture and Media, argues that the reduced VAT rates applicable to printed books should also become applicable to e-books and informs that the German coalition government has agreed to advocate the mandatory introduction of reduced VAT rates for e-books on the EU level. With this position, the German government is by no means isolated; thus, it can be expected that this issue will be taken up in the further course of this year. Further Development of the Taxation Rules for the Digital Economy The European Commission intends to further amend the rules governing the taxation of the digital economy. For this purpose, in 2013, it established an expert group on taxation of the digital economy which had its second meeting in January 2014. Respective information can be found under http://ec.europa.eu/taxation_customs/taxation/gen_info/good_governance_matters/digital_economy/index_en.htm, which also includes information on respective VAT issues on the agenda. In accordance with a respective working paper on VAT issues, an extension of the new rules for e- services to the supply of goods ordered online is considered. Suppliers should carefully monitor respective upcoming changes and further developments. 5

Authors: Valentina Farle, LL.M. (Sheffield) valentina.farle@klgates.com T +49.69.945.196.295 Rainer Schmitt rainer.schmitt@klgates.com T +49.69.945.196.290 For information about data protection, please turn to Dr. Tobias Bosch, J.S.M. (Stanford) tobias.bosch@klgates.com T +49.30.220.029.410 Anchorage Austin Beijing Berlin Boston Brisbane Brussels Charleston Charlotte Chicago Dallas Doha Dubai Fort Worth Frankfurt Harrisburg Hong Kong Houston London Los Angeles Melbourne Miami Milan Moscow Newark New York Orange County Palo Alto Paris Perth Pittsburgh Portland Raleigh Research Triangle Park San Diego San Francisco São Paulo Seattle Seoul Shanghai Singapore Spokane Sydney Taipei Tokyo Warsaw Washington, D.C. Wilmington K&L Gates practices out of 48 fully integrated offices located in the United States, Asia, Australia, Europe, the Middle East and South America and represents leading global corporations, growth and middle-market companies, capital markets participants and entrepreneurs in every major industry group as well as public sector entities, educational institutions, philanthropic organizations and individuals. For more information about K&L Gates or its locations, practices and registrations, visit www.klgates.com. This publication is for informational purposes and does not contain or convey legal advice. The information herein should not be used or relied upon in regard to any particular facts or circumstances without first consulting a lawyer. 2014 K&L Gates LLP. All Rights Reserved. 6